@cregis-dev/cckit 0.4.1 → 0.6.1

package/templates/ecc/commands/multi-plan.md

@@ -1,261 +0,0 @@
-# Plan - Multi-Model Collaborative Planning
-
-Multi-model collaborative planning - Context retrieval + Dual-model analysis → Generate step-by-step implementation plan.
-
-$ARGUMENTS
-
----
-
-## Core Protocols
-
-- **Language Protocol**: Use **English** when interacting with tools/models, communicate with user in their language
-- **Mandatory Parallel**: Codex/Gemini calls MUST use `run_in_background: true` (including single model calls, to avoid blocking main thread)
-- **Code Sovereignty**: External models have **zero filesystem write access**, all modifications by Claude
-- **Stop-Loss Mechanism**: Do not proceed to next phase until current phase output is validated
-- **Planning Only**: This command allows reading context and writing to `.claude/plan/*` plan files, but **NEVER modify production code**
-
----
-
-## Multi-Model Call Specification
-
-**Call Syntax** (parallel: use `run_in_background: true`):
-
-```
-Bash({
-  command: "~/.claude/bin/codeagent-wrapper {{LITE_MODE_FLAG}}--backend <codex|gemini> {{GEMINI_MODEL_FLAG}}- \"$PWD\" <<'EOF'
-ROLE_FILE: <role prompt path>
-<TASK>
-Requirement: <enhanced requirement>
-Context: <retrieved project context>
-</TASK>
-OUTPUT: Step-by-step implementation plan with pseudo-code. DO NOT modify any files.
-EOF",
-  run_in_background: true,
-  timeout: 3600000,
-  description: "Brief description"
-})
-```
-
-**Model Parameter Notes**:
-- `{{GEMINI_MODEL_FLAG}}`: When using `--backend gemini`, replace with `--gemini-model gemini-3-pro-preview` (note trailing space); use empty string for codex
-
-**Role Prompts**:
-
-| Phase | Codex | Gemini |
-|-------|-------|--------|
-| Analysis | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/codex/analyzer.md` | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/gemini/analyzer.md` |
-| Planning | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/codex/architect.md` | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/gemini/architect.md` |
-
-**Session Reuse**: Each call returns `SESSION_ID: xxx` (typically output by wrapper), **MUST save** for subsequent `/ccg:execute` use.
-
-**Wait for Background Tasks** (max timeout 600000ms = 10 minutes):
-
-```
-TaskOutput({ task_id: "<task_id>", block: true, timeout: 600000 })
-```
-
-**IMPORTANT**:
-- Must specify `timeout: 600000`, otherwise default 30 seconds will cause premature timeout
-- If still incomplete after 10 minutes, continue polling with `TaskOutput`, **NEVER kill the process**
-- If waiting is skipped due to timeout, **MUST call `AskUserQuestion` to ask user whether to continue waiting or kill task**
-
----
-
-## Execution Workflow
-
-**Planning Task**: $ARGUMENTS
-
-### Phase 1: Full Context Retrieval
-
-`[Mode: Research]`
-
-#### 1.1 Prompt Enhancement (MUST execute first)
-
-**MUST call `mcp__ace-tool__enhance_prompt` tool**:
-
-```
-mcp__ace-tool__enhance_prompt({
-  prompt: "$ARGUMENTS",
-  conversation_history: "<last 5-10 conversation turns>",
-  project_root_path: "$PWD"
-})
-```
-
-Wait for enhanced prompt, **replace original $ARGUMENTS with enhanced result** for all subsequent phases.
-
-#### 1.2 Context Retrieval
-
-**Call `mcp__ace-tool__search_context` tool**:
-
-```
-mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
-  query: "<semantic query based on enhanced requirement>",
-  project_root_path: "$PWD"
-})
-```
-
-- Build semantic query using natural language (Where/What/How)
-- **NEVER answer based on assumptions**
-- If MCP unavailable: fallback to Glob + Grep for file discovery and key symbol location
-
-#### 1.3 Completeness Check
-
-- Must obtain **complete definitions and signatures** for relevant classes, functions, variables
-- If context insufficient, trigger **recursive retrieval**
-- Prioritize output: entry file + line number + key symbol name; add minimal code snippets only when necessary to resolve ambiguity
-
-#### 1.4 Requirement Alignment
-
-- If requirements still have ambiguity, **MUST** output guiding questions for user
-- Until requirement boundaries are clear (no omissions, no redundancy)
-
-### Phase 2: Multi-Model Collaborative Analysis
-
-`[Mode: Analysis]`
-
-#### 2.1 Distribute Inputs
-
-**Parallel call** Codex and Gemini (`run_in_background: true`):
-
-Distribute **original requirement** (without preset opinions) to both models:
-
-1. **Codex Backend Analysis**:
-   - ROLE_FILE: `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/codex/analyzer.md`
-   - Focus: Technical feasibility, architecture impact, performance considerations, potential risks
-   - OUTPUT: Multi-perspective solutions + pros/cons analysis
-
-2. **Gemini Frontend Analysis**:
-   - ROLE_FILE: `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/gemini/analyzer.md`
-   - Focus: UI/UX impact, user experience, visual design
-   - OUTPUT: Multi-perspective solutions + pros/cons analysis
-
-Wait for both models' complete results with `TaskOutput`. **Save SESSION_ID** (`CODEX_SESSION` and `GEMINI_SESSION`).
-
-#### 2.2 Cross-Validation
-
-Integrate perspectives and iterate for optimization:
-
-1. **Identify consensus** (strong signal)
-2. **Identify divergence** (needs weighing)
-3. **Complementary strengths**: Backend logic follows Codex, Frontend design follows Gemini
-4. **Logical reasoning**: Eliminate logical gaps in solutions
-
-#### 2.3 (Optional but Recommended) Dual-Model Plan Draft
-
-To reduce risk of omissions in Claude's synthesized plan, can parallel have both models output "plan drafts" (still **NOT allowed** to modify files):
-
-1. **Codex Plan Draft** (Backend authority):
-   - ROLE_FILE: `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/codex/architect.md`
-   - OUTPUT: Step-by-step plan + pseudo-code (focus: data flow/edge cases/error handling/test strategy)
-
-2. **Gemini Plan Draft** (Frontend authority):
-   - ROLE_FILE: `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/gemini/architect.md`
-   - OUTPUT: Step-by-step plan + pseudo-code (focus: information architecture/interaction/accessibility/visual consistency)
-
-Wait for both models' complete results with `TaskOutput`, record key differences in their suggestions.
-
-#### 2.4 Generate Implementation Plan (Claude Final Version)
-
-Synthesize both analyses, generate **Step-by-step Implementation Plan**:
-
-```markdown
-## Implementation Plan: <Task Name>
-
-### Task Type
-- [ ] Frontend (→ Gemini)
-- [ ] Backend (→ Codex)
-- [ ] Fullstack (→ Parallel)
-
-### Technical Solution
-<Optimal solution synthesized from Codex + Gemini analysis>
-
-### Implementation Steps
-1. <Step 1> - Expected deliverable
-2. <Step 2> - Expected deliverable
-...
-
-### Key Files
-| File | Operation | Description |
-|------|-----------|-------------|
-| path/to/file.ts:L10-L50 | Modify | Description |
-
-### Risks and Mitigation
-| Risk | Mitigation |
-|------|------------|
-
-### SESSION_ID (for /ccg:execute use)
-- CODEX_SESSION: <session_id>
-- GEMINI_SESSION: <session_id>
-```
-
-### Phase 2 End: Plan Delivery (Not Execution)
-
-**`/ccg:plan` responsibilities end here, MUST execute the following actions**:
-
-1. Present complete implementation plan to user (including pseudo-code)
-2. Save plan to `.claude/plan/<feature-name>.md` (extract feature name from requirement, e.g., `user-auth`, `payment-module`)
-3. Output prompt in **bold text** (MUST use actual saved file path):
-
-   ---
-   **Plan generated and saved to `.claude/plan/actual-feature-name.md`**
-
-   **Please review the plan above. You can:**
-   - **Modify plan**: Tell me what needs adjustment, I'll update the plan
-   - **Execute plan**: Copy the following command to a new session
-
-   ```
-   /ccg:execute .claude/plan/actual-feature-name.md
-   ```
-   ---
-
-   **NOTE**: The `actual-feature-name.md` above MUST be replaced with the actual saved filename!
-
-4. **Immediately terminate current response** (Stop here. No more tool calls.)
-
-**ABSOLUTELY FORBIDDEN**:
-- Ask user "Y/N" then auto-execute (execution is `/ccg:execute`'s responsibility)
-- Any write operations to production code
-- Automatically call `/ccg:execute` or any implementation actions
-- Continue triggering model calls when user hasn't explicitly requested modifications
-
----
-
-## Plan Saving
-
-After planning completes, save plan to:
-
-- **First planning**: `.claude/plan/<feature-name>.md`
-- **Iteration versions**: `.claude/plan/<feature-name>-v2.md`, `.claude/plan/<feature-name>-v3.md`...
-
-Plan file write should complete before presenting plan to user.
-
----
-
-## Plan Modification Flow
-
-If user requests plan modifications:
-
-1. Adjust plan content based on user feedback
-2. Update `.claude/plan/<feature-name>.md` file
-3. Re-present modified plan
-4. Prompt user to review or execute again
-
----
-
-## Next Steps
-
-After user approves, **manually** execute:
-
-```bash
-/ccg:execute .claude/plan/<feature-name>.md
-```
-
----
-
-## Key Rules
-
-1. **Plan only, no implementation** – This command does not execute any code changes
-2. **No Y/N prompts** – Only present plan, let user decide next steps
-3. **Trust Rules** – Backend follows Codex, Frontend follows Gemini
-4. External models have **zero filesystem write access**
-5. **SESSION_ID Handoff** – Plan must include `CODEX_SESSION` / `GEMINI_SESSION` at end (for `/ccg:execute resume <SESSION_ID>` use)

package/templates/ecc/commands/multi-workflow.md

@@ -1,183 +0,0 @@
-# Workflow - Multi-Model Collaborative Development
-
-Multi-model collaborative development workflow (Research → Ideation → Plan → Execute → Optimize → Review), with intelligent routing: Frontend → Gemini, Backend → Codex.
-
-Structured development workflow with quality gates, MCP services, and multi-model collaboration.
-
-## Usage
-
-```bash
-/workflow <task description>
-```
-
-## Context
-
-- Task to develop: $ARGUMENTS
-- Structured 6-phase workflow with quality gates
-- Multi-model collaboration: Codex (backend) + Gemini (frontend) + Claude (orchestration)
-- MCP service integration (ace-tool) for enhanced capabilities
-
-## Your Role
-
-You are the **Orchestrator**, coordinating a multi-model collaborative system (Research → Ideation → Plan → Execute → Optimize → Review). Communicate concisely and professionally for experienced developers.
-
-**Collaborative Models**:
-- **ace-tool MCP** – Code retrieval + Prompt enhancement
-- **Codex** – Backend logic, algorithms, debugging (**Backend authority, trustworthy**)
-- **Gemini** – Frontend UI/UX, visual design (**Frontend expert, backend opinions for reference only**)
-- **Claude (self)** – Orchestration, planning, execution, delivery
-
----
-
-## Multi-Model Call Specification
-
-**Call syntax** (parallel: `run_in_background: true`, sequential: `false`):
-
-```
-# New session call
-Bash({
-  command: "~/.claude/bin/codeagent-wrapper {{LITE_MODE_FLAG}}--backend <codex|gemini> {{GEMINI_MODEL_FLAG}}- \"$PWD\" <<'EOF'
-ROLE_FILE: <role prompt path>
-<TASK>
-Requirement: <enhanced requirement (or $ARGUMENTS if not enhanced)>
-Context: <project context and analysis from previous phases>
-</TASK>
-OUTPUT: Expected output format
-EOF",
-  run_in_background: true,
-  timeout: 3600000,
-  description: "Brief description"
-})
-
-# Resume session call
-Bash({
-  command: "~/.claude/bin/codeagent-wrapper {{LITE_MODE_FLAG}}--backend <codex|gemini> {{GEMINI_MODEL_FLAG}}resume <SESSION_ID> - \"$PWD\" <<'EOF'
-ROLE_FILE: <role prompt path>
-<TASK>
-Requirement: <enhanced requirement (or $ARGUMENTS if not enhanced)>
-Context: <project context and analysis from previous phases>
-</TASK>
-OUTPUT: Expected output format
-EOF",
-  run_in_background: true,
-  timeout: 3600000,
-  description: "Brief description"
-})
-```
-
-**Model Parameter Notes**:
-- `{{GEMINI_MODEL_FLAG}}`: When using `--backend gemini`, replace with `--gemini-model gemini-3-pro-preview` (note trailing space); use empty string for codex
-
-**Role Prompts**:
-
-| Phase | Codex | Gemini |
-|-------|-------|--------|
-| Analysis | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/codex/analyzer.md` | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/gemini/analyzer.md` |
-| Planning | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/codex/architect.md` | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/gemini/architect.md` |
-| Review | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/codex/reviewer.md` | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/gemini/reviewer.md` |
-
-**Session Reuse**: Each call returns `SESSION_ID: xxx`, use `resume xxx` subcommand for subsequent phases (note: `resume`, not `--resume`).
-
-**Parallel Calls**: Use `run_in_background: true` to start, wait for results with `TaskOutput`. **Must wait for all models to return before proceeding to next phase**.
-
-**Wait for Background Tasks** (use max timeout 600000ms = 10 minutes):
-
-```
-TaskOutput({ task_id: "<task_id>", block: true, timeout: 600000 })
-```
-
-**IMPORTANT**:
-- Must specify `timeout: 600000`, otherwise default 30 seconds will cause premature timeout.
-- If still incomplete after 10 minutes, continue polling with `TaskOutput`, **NEVER kill the process**.
-- If waiting is skipped due to timeout, **MUST call `AskUserQuestion` to ask user whether to continue waiting or kill task. Never kill directly.**
-
----
-
-## Communication Guidelines
-
-1. Start responses with mode label `[Mode: X]`, initial is `[Mode: Research]`.
-2. Follow strict sequence: `Research → Ideation → Plan → Execute → Optimize → Review`.
-3. Request user confirmation after each phase completion.
-4. Force stop when score < 7 or user does not approve.
-5. Use `AskUserQuestion` tool for user interaction when needed (e.g., confirmation/selection/approval).
-
----
-
-## Execution Workflow
-
-**Task Description**: $ARGUMENTS
-
-### Phase 1: Research & Analysis
-
-`[Mode: Research]` - Understand requirements and gather context:
-
-1. **Prompt Enhancement**: Call `mcp__ace-tool__enhance_prompt`, **replace original $ARGUMENTS with enhanced result for all subsequent Codex/Gemini calls**
-2. **Context Retrieval**: Call `mcp__ace-tool__search_context`
-3. **Requirement Completeness Score** (0-10):
-   - Goal clarity (0-3), Expected outcome (0-3), Scope boundaries (0-2), Constraints (0-2)
-   - ≥7: Continue | <7: Stop, ask clarifying questions
-
-### Phase 2: Solution Ideation
-
-`[Mode: Ideation]` - Multi-model parallel analysis:
-
-**Parallel Calls** (`run_in_background: true`):
-- Codex: Use analyzer prompt, output technical feasibility, solutions, risks
-- Gemini: Use analyzer prompt, output UI feasibility, solutions, UX evaluation
-
-Wait for results with `TaskOutput`. **Save SESSION_ID** (`CODEX_SESSION` and `GEMINI_SESSION`).
-
-**Follow the `IMPORTANT` instructions in `Multi-Model Call Specification` above**
-
-Synthesize both analyses, output solution comparison (at least 2 options), wait for user selection.
-
-### Phase 3: Detailed Planning
-
-`[Mode: Plan]` - Multi-model collaborative planning:
-
-**Parallel Calls** (resume session with `resume <SESSION_ID>`):
-- Codex: Use architect prompt + `resume $CODEX_SESSION`, output backend architecture
-- Gemini: Use architect prompt + `resume $GEMINI_SESSION`, output frontend architecture
-
-Wait for results with `TaskOutput`.
-
-**Follow the `IMPORTANT` instructions in `Multi-Model Call Specification` above**
-
-**Claude Synthesis**: Adopt Codex backend plan + Gemini frontend plan, save to `.claude/plan/task-name.md` after user approval.
-
-### Phase 4: Implementation
-
-`[Mode: Execute]` - Code development:
-
-- Strictly follow approved plan
-- Follow existing project code standards
-- Request feedback at key milestones
-
-### Phase 5: Code Optimization
-
-`[Mode: Optimize]` - Multi-model parallel review:
-
-**Parallel Calls**:
-- Codex: Use reviewer prompt, focus on security, performance, error handling
-- Gemini: Use reviewer prompt, focus on accessibility, design consistency
-
-Wait for results with `TaskOutput`. Integrate review feedback, execute optimization after user confirmation.
-
-**Follow the `IMPORTANT` instructions in `Multi-Model Call Specification` above**
-
-### Phase 6: Quality Review
-
-`[Mode: Review]` - Final evaluation:
-
-- Check completion against plan
-- Run tests to verify functionality
-- Report issues and recommendations
-- Request final user confirmation
-
----
-
-## Key Rules
-
-1. Phase sequence cannot be skipped (unless user explicitly instructs)
-2. External models have **zero filesystem write access**, all modifications by Claude
-3. **Force stop** when score < 7 or user does not approve

package/templates/ecc/commands/orchestrate.md

@@ -1,172 +0,0 @@
-# Orchestrate Command
-
-Sequential agent workflow for complex tasks.
-
-## Usage
-
-`/orchestrate [workflow-type] [task-description]`
-
-## Workflow Types
-
-### feature
-Full feature implementation workflow:
-```
-planner -> tdd-guide -> code-reviewer -> security-reviewer
-```
-
-### bugfix
-Bug investigation and fix workflow:
-```
-planner -> tdd-guide -> code-reviewer
-```
-
-### refactor
-Safe refactoring workflow:
-```
-architect -> code-reviewer -> tdd-guide
-```
-
-### security
-Security-focused review:
-```
-security-reviewer -> code-reviewer -> architect
-```
-
-## Execution Pattern
-
-For each agent in the workflow:
-
-1. **Invoke agent** with context from previous agent
-2. **Collect output** as structured handoff document
-3. **Pass to next agent** in chain
-4. **Aggregate results** into final report
-
-## Handoff Document Format
-
-Between agents, create handoff document:
-
-```markdown
-## HANDOFF: [previous-agent] -> [next-agent]
-
-### Context
-[Summary of what was done]
-
-### Findings
-[Key discoveries or decisions]
-
-### Files Modified
-[List of files touched]
-
-### Open Questions
-[Unresolved items for next agent]
-
-### Recommendations
-[Suggested next steps]
-```
-
-## Example: Feature Workflow
-
-```
-/orchestrate feature "Add user authentication"
-```
-
-Executes:
-
-1. **Planner Agent**
-   - Analyzes requirements
-   - Creates implementation plan
-   - Identifies dependencies
-   - Output: `HANDOFF: planner -> tdd-guide`
-
-2. **TDD Guide Agent**
-   - Reads planner handoff
-   - Writes tests first
-   - Implements to pass tests
-   - Output: `HANDOFF: tdd-guide -> code-reviewer`
-
-3. **Code Reviewer Agent**
-   - Reviews implementation
-   - Checks for issues
-   - Suggests improvements
-   - Output: `HANDOFF: code-reviewer -> security-reviewer`
-
-4. **Security Reviewer Agent**
-   - Security audit
-   - Vulnerability check
-   - Final approval
-   - Output: Final Report
-
-## Final Report Format
-
-```
-ORCHESTRATION REPORT
-====================
-Workflow: feature
-Task: Add user authentication
-Agents: planner -> tdd-guide -> code-reviewer -> security-reviewer
-
-SUMMARY
--------
-[One paragraph summary]
-
-AGENT OUTPUTS
--------------
-Planner: [summary]
-TDD Guide: [summary]
-Code Reviewer: [summary]
-Security Reviewer: [summary]
-
-FILES CHANGED
--------------
-[List all files modified]
-
-TEST RESULTS
-------------
-[Test pass/fail summary]
-
-SECURITY STATUS
----------------
-[Security findings]
-
-RECOMMENDATION
---------------
-[SHIP / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED]
-```
-
-## Parallel Execution
-
-For independent checks, run agents in parallel:
-
-```markdown
-### Parallel Phase
-Run simultaneously:
-- code-reviewer (quality)
-- security-reviewer (security)
-- architect (design)
-
-### Merge Results
-Combine outputs into single report
-```
-
-## Arguments
-
-$ARGUMENTS:
-- `feature <description>` - Full feature workflow
-- `bugfix <description>` - Bug fix workflow
-- `refactor <description>` - Refactoring workflow
-- `security <description>` - Security review workflow
-- `custom <agents> <description>` - Custom agent sequence
-
-## Custom Workflow Example
-
-```
-/orchestrate custom "architect,tdd-guide,code-reviewer" "Redesign caching layer"
-```
-
-## Tips
-
-1. **Start with planner** for complex features
-2. **Always include code-reviewer** before merge
-3. **Use security-reviewer** for auth/payment/PII
-4. **Keep handoffs concise** - focus on what next agent needs
-5. **Run verification** between agents if needed