npm - @cregis-dev/cckit - Versions diffs - 0.4.1 → 0.6.1 - Mend

@cregis-dev/cckit 0.4.1 → 0.6.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Files changed (795) hide show

package/templates/bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/test-review/steps-c/step-01-load-context.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,197 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-01-load-context'
-description: 'Load knowledge base, determine scope, and gather context'
-nextStepFile: './step-02-discover-tests.md'
-knowledgeIndex: '{project-root}/_bmad/tea/testarch/tea-index.csv'
-outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/test-review.md'
----
-# Step 1: Load Context & Knowledge Base
-## STEP GOAL
-Determine review scope, load required knowledge fragments, and gather related artifacts.
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
-- 📖 Read the entire step file before acting
-- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
----
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
-- 💾 Record outputs before proceeding
-- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Available context: config, loaded artifacts, and knowledge fragments
-- Focus: this step's goal only
-- Limits: do not execute future steps
-- Dependencies: prior steps' outputs (if any)
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
-## 1. Determine Scope and Stack
-Use `review_scope`:
-- **single**: one file
-- **directory**: all tests in folder
-- **suite**: all tests in repo
-If unclear, ask the user.
-**Stack Detection** (for context-aware loading):
-Read `test_stack_type` from `{config_source}`. If `"auto"` or not configured, infer `{detected_stack}` by scanning `{project-root}`:
-- **Frontend indicators**: `playwright.config.*`, `cypress.config.*`, `package.json` with react/vue/angular
-- **Backend indicators**: `pyproject.toml`, `pom.xml`/`build.gradle`, `go.mod`, `*.csproj`, `Gemfile`, `Cargo.toml`
-- **Both present** → `fullstack`; only frontend → `frontend`; only backend → `backend`
-- Explicit `test_stack_type` overrides auto-detection
----
-### Tiered Knowledge Loading
-Load fragments based on their `tier` classification in `tea-index.csv`:
-1. **Core tier** (always load): Foundational fragments required for this workflow
-2. **Extended tier** (load on-demand): Load when deeper analysis is needed or when the user's context requires it
-3. **Specialized tier** (load only when relevant): Load only when the specific use case matches (e.g., contract-testing only for microservices, email-auth only for email flows)
-> **Context Efficiency**: Loading only core fragments reduces context usage by 40-50% compared to loading all fragments.
-### Playwright Utils Loading Profiles
-**If `tea_use_playwright_utils` is enabled**, select the appropriate loading profile:
-- **API-only profile** (when `{detected_stack}` is `backend` or no `page.goto`/`page.locator` found in test files):
-  Load: `overview`, `api-request`, `auth-session`, `recurse` (~1,800 lines)
-- **Full UI+API profile** (when `{detected_stack}` is `frontend`/`fullstack` or browser tests detected):
-  Load: all Playwright Utils core fragments (~4,500 lines)
-**Detection**: Scan `{test_dir}` for files containing `page.goto` or `page.locator`. If none found, use API-only profile.
-### Pact.js Utils Loading
-**If `tea_use_pactjs_utils` is enabled** (and contract tests detected in review scope):
-Load: `pactjs-utils-overview.md`, `pactjs-utils-provider-verifier.md`, `pactjs-utils-request-filter.md` (the 3 most relevant for reviewing provider verification tests)
-**If `tea_use_pactjs_utils` is disabled** but contract tests are in review scope:
-Load: `contract-testing.md`
-### Pact MCP Loading
-**If `tea_pact_mcp` is `"mcp"`:**
-Load: `pact-mcp.md` — enables agent to use SmartBear MCP "Review Pact Tests" tool for automated best-practice feedback during test review.
-## 2. Load Knowledge Base
-From `{knowledgeIndex}` load:
-Read `{config_source}` and check `tea_use_playwright_utils`, `tea_use_pactjs_utils`, `tea_pact_mcp`, and `tea_browser_automation` to select the correct fragment set.
-**Core:**
-- `test-quality.md`
-- `data-factories.md`
-- `test-levels-framework.md`
-- `selective-testing.md`
-- `test-healing-patterns.md`
-- `selector-resilience.md`
-- `timing-debugging.md`
-**If Playwright Utils enabled:**
-- `overview.md`, `api-request.md`, `network-recorder.md`, `auth-session.md`, `intercept-network-call.md`, `recurse.md`, `log.md`, `file-utils.md`, `burn-in.md`, `network-error-monitor.md`, `fixtures-composition.md`
-**If disabled:**
-- `fixture-architecture.md`
-- `network-first.md`
-- `playwright-config.md`
-- `component-tdd.md`
-- `ci-burn-in.md`
-**Playwright CLI (if `tea_browser_automation` is "cli" or "auto"):**
-- `playwright-cli.md`
-**MCP Patterns (if `tea_browser_automation` is "mcp" or "auto"):**
-- (existing MCP-related fragments, if any are added in future)
-**Pact.js Utils (if enabled and contract tests in review scope):**
-- `pactjs-utils-overview.md`, `pactjs-utils-provider-verifier.md`, `pactjs-utils-request-filter.md`
-**Contract Testing (if pactjs-utils disabled but contract tests in review scope):**
-- `contract-testing.md`
-**Pact MCP (if tea_pact_mcp is "mcp"):**
-- `pact-mcp.md`
----
-## 3. Gather Context Artifacts
-If available:
-- Story file (acceptance criteria)
-- Test design doc (priorities)
-- Framework config
-Summarize what was found.
-Coverage mapping and coverage gates are out of scope in `test-review`. Route those concerns to `trace`.
----
-## 4. Save Progress
-**Save this step's accumulated work to `{outputFile}`.**
-- **If `{outputFile}` does not exist** (first save), create it using the workflow template (if available) with YAML frontmatter:
-  ```yaml
-  ---
-  stepsCompleted: ['step-01-load-context']
-  lastStep: 'step-01-load-context'
-  lastSaved: '{date}'
-  ---
-  ```
-  Then write this step's output below the frontmatter.
-- **If `{outputFile}` already exists**, update:
-  - Add `'step-01-load-context'` to `stepsCompleted` array (only if not already present)
-  - Set `lastStep: 'step-01-load-context'`
-  - Set `lastSaved: '{date}'`
-  - Append this step's output to the appropriate section of the document.
-**Update `inputDocuments`**: Set `inputDocuments` in the output template frontmatter to the list of artifact paths loaded in this step (e.g., knowledge fragments, test design documents, configuration files).
-Load next step: `{nextStepFile}`
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-- Step completed in full with required outputs
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-- Skipped sequence steps or missing outputs
-  **Master Rule:** Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.

package/templates/bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/test-review/steps-c/step-01b-resume.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,104 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-01b-resume'
-description: 'Resume interrupted workflow from last completed step'
-outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/test-review.md'
----
-# Step 1b: Resume Workflow
-## STEP GOAL
-Resume an interrupted workflow by loading the existing output document, displaying progress, and routing to the next incomplete step.
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
-- Read the entire step file before acting
-- Speak in `{communication_language}`
----
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
-- Load the next step only when instructed
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Available context: Output document with progress frontmatter
-- Focus: Load progress and route to next step
-- Limits: Do not re-execute completed steps
-- Dependencies: Output document must exist from a previous run
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly.
-### 1. Load Output Document
-Read `{outputFile}` and parse YAML frontmatter for:
-- `stepsCompleted` -- array of completed step names
-- `lastStep` -- last completed step name
-- `lastSaved` -- timestamp of last save
-**If `{outputFile}` does not exist**, display:
-"No previous progress found. There is no output document to resume from. Please use **[C] Create** to start a fresh workflow run."
-**THEN:** Halt. Do not proceed.
----
-### 2. Display Progress Dashboard
-Display progress with checkmark/empty indicators:
-```
-Test Quality Review - Resume Progress:
-1. Load Context (step-01-load-context)              [completed/pending]
-2. Discover Tests (step-02-discover-tests)           [completed/pending]
-3. Quality Evaluation + Aggregate (step-03f-aggregate-scores) [completed/pending]
-4. Generate Report (step-04-generate-report)         [completed/pending]
-Last saved: {lastSaved}
-```
----
-### 3. Route to Next Step
-Based on `lastStep`, load the next incomplete step:
-| lastStep                    | Next Step File                    |
-| --------------------------- | --------------------------------- |
-| `step-01-load-context`      | `./step-02-discover-tests.md`     |
-| `step-02-discover-tests`    | `./step-03-quality-evaluation.md` |
-| `step-03f-aggregate-scores` | `./step-04-generate-report.md`    |
-| `step-04-generate-report`   | **Workflow already complete.**    |
-**If `lastStep` is the final step** (`step-04-generate-report`), display: "All steps completed. Use **[C] Create** to start fresh, **[V] Validate** to review outputs, or **[E] Edit** to make revisions." Then halt.
-**If `lastStep` does not match any value above**, display: "Unknown progress state (`lastStep`: {lastStep}). Please use **[C] Create** to start fresh." Then halt.
-**Otherwise**, load the identified step file, read completely, and execute.
-The existing content in `{outputFile}` provides context from previously completed steps.
----
-## SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-### SUCCESS:
-- Output document loaded and parsed correctly
-- Progress dashboard displayed accurately
-- Routed to correct next step
-### FAILURE:
-- Not loading output document
-- Incorrect progress display
-- Routing to wrong step
-**Master Rule:** Resume MUST route to the exact next incomplete step. Never re-execute completed steps.

package/templates/bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/test-review/steps-c/step-02-discover-tests.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,113 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-02-discover-tests'
-description: 'Find and parse test files'
-nextStepFile: './step-03-quality-evaluation.md'
-outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/test-review.md'
----
-# Step 2: Discover & Parse Tests
-## STEP GOAL
-Collect test files in scope and parse structure/metadata.
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
-- 📖 Read the entire step file before acting
-- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
----
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
-- 💾 Record outputs before proceeding
-- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Available context: config, loaded artifacts, and knowledge fragments
-- Focus: this step's goal only
-- Limits: do not execute future steps
-- Dependencies: prior steps' outputs (if any)
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
-## 1. Discover Test Files
-- **single**: use provided file path
-- **directory**: glob under `{test_dir}` or selected folder
-- **suite**: glob all tests in repo
-Halt if no tests are found.
----
-## 2. Parse Metadata (per file)
-Collect:
-- File size and line count
-- Test framework detected
-- Describe/test block counts
-- Test IDs and priority markers
-- Imports, fixtures, factories, network interception
-- Waits/timeouts and control flow (if/try/catch)
----
-## 3. Evidence Collection (if `tea_browser_automation` is `cli` or `auto`)
-> **Fallback:** If CLI is not installed, fall back to MCP (if available) or skip evidence collection.
-**CLI Evidence Collection:**
-All commands use the same named session to target the correct browser:
-1. `playwright-cli -s=tea-review open <target_url>`
-2. `playwright-cli -s=tea-review tracing-start`
-3. Execute the flow under review (using `-s=tea-review` on each command)
-4. `playwright-cli -s=tea-review tracing-stop` → saves trace.zip
-5. `playwright-cli -s=tea-review screenshot --filename={test_artifacts}/review-evidence.png`
-6. `playwright-cli -s=tea-review network` → capture network request log
-7. `playwright-cli -s=tea-review close`
-> **Session Hygiene:** Always close sessions using `playwright-cli -s=tea-review close`. Do NOT use `close-all` — it kills every session on the machine and breaks parallel execution.
----
-## 4. Save Progress
-**Save this step's accumulated work to `{outputFile}`.**
-- **If `{outputFile}` does not exist** (first save), create it using the workflow template (if available) with YAML frontmatter:
-  ```yaml
-  ---
-  stepsCompleted: ['step-02-discover-tests']
-  lastStep: 'step-02-discover-tests'
-  lastSaved: '{date}'
-  ---
-  ```
-  Then write this step's output below the frontmatter.
-- **If `{outputFile}` already exists**, update:
-  - Add `'step-02-discover-tests'` to `stepsCompleted` array (only if not already present)
-  - Set `lastStep: 'step-02-discover-tests'`
-  - Set `lastSaved: '{date}'`
-  - Append this step's output to the appropriate section of the document.
-Load next step: `{nextStepFile}`
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-- Step completed in full with required outputs
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-- Skipped sequence steps or missing outputs
-  **Master Rule:** Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.

package/templates/bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/test-review/steps-c/step-03-quality-evaluation.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,274 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-03-quality-evaluation'
-description: 'Orchestrate adaptive quality dimension checks (agent-team, subagent, or sequential)'
-nextStepFile: './step-03f-aggregate-scores.md'
----
-# Step 3: Orchestrate Adaptive Quality Evaluation
-## STEP GOAL
-Select execution mode deterministically, then evaluate quality dimensions using agent-team, subagent, or sequential execution while preserving output contracts:
-- Determinism
-- Isolation
-- Maintainability
-- Performance
-Coverage is intentionally excluded from this workflow and handled by `trace`.
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
-- 📖 Read the entire step file before acting
-- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
-- ✅ Resolve execution mode from config (`tea_execution_mode`, `tea_capability_probe`)
-- ✅ Apply fallback rules deterministically when requested mode is unsupported
-- ✅ Wait for required worker steps to complete
-- ❌ Do NOT skip capability checks when probing is enabled
-- ❌ Do NOT proceed until required worker steps finish
----
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
-- 💾 Wait for subagent outputs
-- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Available context: test files from Step 2, knowledge fragments
-- Focus: orchestration only (mode selection + worker dispatch)
-- Limits: do not evaluate quality directly (delegate to worker steps)
----
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-### 1. Prepare Execution Context
-**Generate unique timestamp:**
-```javascript
-const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g, '-');
-```
-**Prepare context for all subagents:**
-```javascript
-const parseBooleanFlag = (value, defaultValue = true) => {
-  if (typeof value === 'string') {
-    const normalized = value.trim().toLowerCase();
-    if (['false', '0', 'off', 'no'].includes(normalized)) return false;
-    if (['true', '1', 'on', 'yes'].includes(normalized)) return true;
-  }
-  if (value === undefined || value === null) return defaultValue;
-  return Boolean(value);
-};
-const subagentContext = {
-  test_files: /* from Step 2 */,
-  knowledge_fragments_loaded: ['test-quality'],
-  config: {
-    execution_mode: config.tea_execution_mode || 'auto',  // "auto" | "subagent" | "agent-team" | "sequential"
-    capability_probe: parseBooleanFlag(config.tea_capability_probe, true),  // supports booleans and "false"/"true" strings
-  },
-  timestamp: timestamp
-};
-```
----
-### 2. Resolve Execution Mode with Capability Probe
-```javascript
-const normalizeUserExecutionMode = (mode) => {
-  if (typeof mode !== 'string') return null;
-  const normalized = mode.trim().toLowerCase().replace(/[-_]/g, ' ').replace(/\s+/g, ' ');
-  if (normalized === 'auto') return 'auto';
-  if (normalized === 'sequential') return 'sequential';
-  if (normalized === 'subagent' || normalized === 'sub agent' || normalized === 'subagents' || normalized === 'sub agents') {
-    return 'subagent';
-  }
-  if (normalized === 'agent team' || normalized === 'agent teams' || normalized === 'agentteam') {
-    return 'agent-team';
-  }
-  return null;
-};
-const normalizeConfigExecutionMode = (mode) => {
-  if (mode === 'subagent') return 'subagent';
-  if (mode === 'auto' || mode === 'sequential' || mode === 'subagent' || mode === 'agent-team') {
-    return mode;
-  }
-  return null;
-};
-// Explicit user instruction in the active run takes priority over config.
-const explicitModeFromUser = normalizeUserExecutionMode(runtime.getExplicitExecutionModeHint?.() || null);
-const requestedMode = explicitModeFromUser || normalizeConfigExecutionMode(subagentContext.config.execution_mode) || 'auto';
-const probeEnabled = subagentContext.config.capability_probe;
-const supports = {
-  subagent: false,
-  agentTeam: false,
-};
-if (probeEnabled) {
-  supports.subagent = runtime.canLaunchSubagents?.() === true;
-  supports.agentTeam = runtime.canLaunchAgentTeams?.() === true;
-}
-let resolvedMode = requestedMode;
-if (requestedMode === 'auto') {
-  if (supports.agentTeam) resolvedMode = 'agent-team';
-  else if (supports.subagent) resolvedMode = 'subagent';
-  else resolvedMode = 'sequential';
-} else if (probeEnabled && requestedMode === 'agent-team' && !supports.agentTeam) {
-  resolvedMode = supports.subagent ? 'subagent' : 'sequential';
-} else if (probeEnabled && requestedMode === 'subagent' && !supports.subagent) {
-  resolvedMode = 'sequential';
-}
-subagentContext.execution = {
-  requestedMode,
-  resolvedMode,
-  probeEnabled,
-  supports,
-};
-```
-Resolution precedence:
-1. Explicit user request in this run (`agent team` => `agent-team`; `subagent` => `subagent`; `sequential`; `auto`)
-2. `tea_execution_mode` from config
-3. Runtime capability fallback (when probing enabled)
-If probing is disabled, honor the requested mode strictly. If that mode cannot be executed at runtime, fail with explicit error instead of silent fallback.
----
-### 3. Dispatch 4 Quality Workers
-**Subagent A: Determinism**
-- File: `./step-03a-subagent-determinism.md`
-- Output: `/tmp/tea-test-review-determinism-${timestamp}.json`
-- Execution:
-  - `agent-team` or `subagent`: launch non-blocking
-  - `sequential`: run blocking and wait
-- Status: Running... ⟳
-**Subagent B: Isolation**
-- File: `./step-03b-subagent-isolation.md`
-- Output: `/tmp/tea-test-review-isolation-${timestamp}.json`
-- Status: Running... ⟳
-**Subagent C: Maintainability**
-- File: `./step-03c-subagent-maintainability.md`
-- Output: `/tmp/tea-test-review-maintainability-${timestamp}.json`
-- Status: Running... ⟳
-**Subagent D: Performance**
-- File: `./step-03e-subagent-performance.md`
-- Output: `/tmp/tea-test-review-performance-${timestamp}.json`
-- Status: Running... ⟳
-In `agent-team` and `subagent` modes, runtime decides worker scheduling and concurrency.
----
-### 4. Wait for Expected Worker Completion
-**If `resolvedMode` is `agent-team` or `subagent`:**
-```
-⏳ Waiting for 4 quality subagents to complete...
-✅ All 4 quality subagents completed successfully!
-```
-**If `resolvedMode` is `sequential`:**
-```
-✅ Sequential mode: each worker already completed during dispatch.
-```
----
-### 5. Verify All Outputs Exist
-```javascript
-const outputs = ['determinism', 'isolation', 'maintainability', 'performance'].map(
-  (dim) => `/tmp/tea-test-review-${dim}-${timestamp}.json`,
-);
-outputs.forEach((output) => {
-  if (!fs.existsSync(output)) {
-    throw new Error(`Subagent output missing: ${output}`);
-  }
-});
-```
----
-### 6. Execution Report
-```
-🚀 Performance Report:
-- Execution Mode: {resolvedMode}
-- Total Elapsed: ~mode-dependent
-- Parallel Gain: ~60-70% faster when mode is subagent/agent-team
-```
----
-### 7. Proceed to Aggregation
-Pass the same `timestamp` value to Step 3F (do not regenerate it). Step 3F must read the exact temp files written in this step.
-Load next step: `{nextStepFile}`
-The aggregation step (3F) will:
-- Read all 4 subagent outputs
-- Calculate weighted overall score (0-100)
-- Aggregate violations by severity
-- Generate review report with top suggestions
----
-## EXIT CONDITION
-Proceed to Step 3F when:
-- ✅ All 4 subagents completed successfully
-- ✅ All output files exist and are valid JSON
-- ✅ Execution metrics displayed
-**Do NOT proceed if any subagent failed.**
----
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS METRICS
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-- All 4 subagents launched and completed
-- All required worker steps completed
-- Output files generated and valid
-- Fallback behavior respected configuration and capability probe rules
-### ❌ FAILURE:
-- One or more subagents failed
-- Output files missing or invalid
-- Unsupported requested mode with probing disabled
-**Master Rule:** Deterministic mode selection + stable output contract. Use the best supported mode, then aggregate normally.