npm - @cregis-dev/cckit - Versions diffs - 0.4.1 → 0.6.1 - Mend

@cregis-dev/cckit 0.4.1 → 0.6.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Files changed (795) hide show

package/templates/bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/test-design/steps-c/step-01-detect-mode.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,134 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-01-detect-mode'
-description: 'Determine system-level vs epic-level mode and validate prerequisites'
-nextStepFile: './step-02-load-context.md'
-outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/test-design-progress.md'
----
-# Step 1: Detect Mode & Prerequisites
-## STEP GOAL
-Determine whether to run **System-Level** or **Epic-Level** test design, and confirm required inputs are available.
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
-### Universal Rules
-- 📖 Read this entire step file before taking any action
-- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
-- 🚫 Do not load the next step until this step is complete
-### Role Reinforcement
-- ✅ You are the **Master Test Architect**
-- ✅ You prioritize risk-based, evidence-backed decisions
----
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
-- 💾 Record outputs before proceeding
-- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Available context: config, loaded artifacts, and knowledge fragments
-- Focus: this step's goal only
-- Limits: do not execute future steps
-- Dependencies: prior steps' outputs (if any)
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
-## 1. Mode Detection (Priority Order)
-### A) User Intent (Highest Priority)
-Use explicit intent if the user already indicates scope:
-- **PRD + ADR (no epic/stories)** → **System-Level Mode**
-- **Epic + Stories (no PRD/ADR)** → **Epic-Level Mode**
-- **Both PRD/ADR + Epic/Stories** → Prefer **System-Level Mode** first
-If intent is unclear, ask:
-> "Should I create (A) **System-level** test design (PRD + ADR → Architecture + QA docs), or (B) **Epic-level** test design (Epic → single test plan)?"
-### B) File-Based Detection (BMad-Integrated)
-If user intent is unclear:
-- If `{implementation_artifacts}/sprint-status.yaml` exists → **Epic-Level Mode**
-- Otherwise → **System-Level Mode**
-### C) Ambiguous → Ask
-If mode still unclear, ask the user to choose (A) or (B) and **halt** until they respond.
----
-## 2. Prerequisite Check (Mode-Specific)
-### System-Level Mode Requires:
-- PRD (functional + non-functional requirements)
-- ADR or architecture decision records
-- Architecture or tech-spec document
-### Epic-Level Mode Requires:
-- Epic and/or story requirements with acceptance criteria
-- Architecture context (if available)
-### HALT CONDITIONS
-If required inputs are missing **and** the user cannot provide them:
-- **System-Level**: "Please provide PRD + ADR/architecture docs to proceed."
-- **Epic-Level**: "Please provide epic/story requirements or acceptance criteria to proceed."
----
-## 3. Confirm Mode
-State which mode you will use and why. Then proceed.
----
-### 4. Save Progress
-**Save this step's accumulated work to `{outputFile}`.**
-- **If `{outputFile}` does not exist** (first save), create it with YAML frontmatter:
-  ```yaml
-  ---
-  stepsCompleted: ['step-01-detect-mode']
-  lastStep: 'step-01-detect-mode'
-  lastSaved: '{date}'
-  ---
-  ```
-  Then write this step's output below the frontmatter.
-- **If `{outputFile}` already exists**, update:
-  - Add `'step-01-detect-mode'` to `stepsCompleted` array (only if not already present)
-  - Set `lastStep: 'step-01-detect-mode'`
-  - Set `lastSaved: '{date}'`
-  - Append this step's output to the appropriate section of the document.
-Load next step: `{nextStepFile}`
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-- Step completed in full with required outputs
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-- Skipped sequence steps or missing outputs
-  **Master Rule:** Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.

package/templates/bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/test-design/steps-c/step-01b-resume.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,102 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-01b-resume'
-description: 'Resume interrupted workflow from last completed step'
-outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/test-design-progress.md'
----
-# Step 1b: Resume Workflow
-## STEP GOAL
-Resume an interrupted workflow by loading the existing output document, displaying progress, and routing to the next incomplete step.
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
-- 📖 Read the entire step file before acting
-- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
----
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
-- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Available context: Output document with progress frontmatter
-- Focus: Load progress and route to next step
-- Limits: Do not re-execute completed steps
-- Dependencies: Output document must exist from a previous run
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
-### 1. Load Output Document
-Read `{outputFile}` and parse YAML frontmatter for:
-- `stepsCompleted` — array of completed step names
-- `lastStep` — last completed step name
-- `lastSaved` — timestamp of last save
-**If `{outputFile}` does not exist**, display:
-"⚠️ **No previous progress found.** There is no output document to resume from. Please use **[C] Create** to start a fresh workflow run."
-**THEN:** Halt. Do not proceed.
----
-### 2. Display Progress Dashboard
-Display:
-"📋 **Workflow Resume — Test Design and Risk Assessment**
-**Last saved:** {lastSaved}
-**Steps completed:** {stepsCompleted.length} of 5
-1. ✅/⬜ Detect Mode (step-01-detect-mode)
-2. ✅/⬜ Load Context (step-02-load-context)
-3. ✅/⬜ Risk & Testability (step-03-risk-and-testability)
-4. ✅/⬜ Coverage Plan (step-04-coverage-plan)
-5. ✅/⬜ Generate Output (step-05-generate-output)"
----
-### 3. Route to Next Step
-Based on `lastStep`, load the next incomplete step:
-- `'step-01-detect-mode'` → `./step-02-load-context.md`
-- `'step-02-load-context'` → `./step-03-risk-and-testability.md`
-- `'step-03-risk-and-testability'` → `./step-04-coverage-plan.md`
-- `'step-04-coverage-plan'` → `./step-05-generate-output.md`
-- `'step-05-generate-output'` → **Workflow already complete.** Display: "✅ **All steps completed.** Use **[V] Validate** to review outputs or **[E] Edit** to make revisions." Then halt.
-**If `lastStep` does not match any value above**, display: "⚠️ **Unknown progress state** (`lastStep`: {lastStep}). Please use **[C] Create** to start fresh." Then halt.
-**Otherwise**, load the identified step file, read completely, and execute.
-The existing content in `{outputFile}` provides context from previously completed steps.
----
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-- Output document loaded and parsed correctly
-- Progress dashboard displayed accurately
-- Routed to correct next step
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-- Not loading output document
-- Incorrect progress display
-- Routing to wrong step
-- Re-executing completed steps
-**Master Rule:** Resume MUST route to the exact next incomplete step. Never re-execute completed steps.

package/templates/bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/test-design/steps-c/step-02-load-context.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,242 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-02-load-context'
-description: 'Load documents, configuration, and knowledge fragments for the chosen mode'
-nextStepFile: './step-03-risk-and-testability.md'
-knowledgeIndex: '{project-root}/_bmad/tea/testarch/tea-index.csv'
-outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/test-design-progress.md'
----
-# Step 2: Load Context & Knowledge Base
-## STEP GOAL
-Load the required documents, config flags, and knowledge fragments needed to produce accurate test design outputs.
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
-- 📖 Read the entire step file before acting
-- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
-- 🎯 Only load artifacts required for the selected mode
----
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
-- 💾 Record outputs before proceeding
-- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Available context: config, loaded artifacts, and knowledge fragments
-- Focus: this step's goal only
-- Limits: do not execute future steps
-- Dependencies: prior steps' outputs (if any)
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
-## 1. Load Configuration
-From `{config_source}`:
-- Read `tea_use_playwright_utils`
-- Read `tea_use_pactjs_utils`
-- Read `tea_pact_mcp`
-- Read `tea_browser_automation`
-- Read `test_stack_type` (if not set, default to `"auto"`)
-- Note `test_artifacts`
-**Stack Detection** (for context-aware loading):
-If `test_stack_type` is `"auto"` or not configured, infer `{detected_stack}` by scanning `{project-root}`:
-- **Frontend indicators**: `playwright.config.*`, `cypress.config.*`, `package.json` with react/vue/angular
-- **Backend indicators**: `pyproject.toml`, `pom.xml`/`build.gradle`, `go.mod`, `*.csproj`, `Gemfile`, `Cargo.toml`
-- **Both present** → `fullstack`; only frontend → `frontend`; only backend → `backend`
-- Explicit `test_stack_type` overrides auto-detection
----
-## 2. Load Project Artifacts (Mode-Specific)
-### System-Level Mode (Phase 3)
-Load:
-- PRD (FRs + NFRs)
-- ADRs or architecture decisions
-- Architecture / tech-spec document
-- Epics (for scope)
-Extract:
-- Tech stack & dependencies
-- Integration points
-- NFRs (performance, security, reliability, compliance)
-### Epic-Level Mode (Phase 4)
-Load:
-- Epic and story docs with acceptance criteria
-- PRD (if available)
-- Architecture / tech-spec (if available)
-- Prior system-level test-design outputs (if available)
-Extract:
-- Testable requirements
-- Integration points
-- Known coverage gaps
----
-## 3. Analyze Existing Test Coverage (Epic-Level)
-If epic-level:
-- Scan the repository for existing tests (search for `tests/`, `spec`, `e2e`, `api` folders)
-- Identify coverage gaps and flaky areas
-- Note existing fixture and test patterns
-### Browser Exploration (if `tea_browser_automation` is `cli` or `auto`)
-> **Fallback:** If CLI is not installed, fall back to MCP (if available) or skip browser exploration and rely on code/doc analysis.
-**CLI Exploration Steps:**
-All commands use the same named session to target the correct browser:
-1. `playwright-cli -s=tea-explore open <target_url>`
-2. `playwright-cli -s=tea-explore snapshot` → capture page structure and element refs
-3. `playwright-cli -s=tea-explore screenshot --filename={test_artifacts}/exploration/explore-<page>.png`
-4. Analyze snapshot output to identify testable elements and flows
-5. `playwright-cli -s=tea-explore close`
-Store artifacts under `{test_artifacts}/exploration/`
-> **Session Hygiene:** Always close sessions using `playwright-cli -s=tea-explore close`. Do NOT use `close-all` — it kills every session on the machine and breaks parallel execution.
----
-### Tiered Knowledge Loading
-Load fragments based on their `tier` classification in `tea-index.csv`:
-1. **Core tier** (always load): Foundational fragments required for this workflow
-2. **Extended tier** (load on-demand): Load when deeper analysis is needed or when the user's context requires it
-3. **Specialized tier** (load only when relevant): Load only when the specific use case matches (e.g., contract-testing only for microservices, email-auth only for email flows)
-> **Context Efficiency**: Loading only core fragments reduces context usage by 40-50% compared to loading all fragments.
-### Playwright Utils Loading Profiles
-**If `tea_use_playwright_utils` is enabled**, select the appropriate loading profile:
-- **API-only profile** (when `{detected_stack}` is `backend` or no `page.goto`/`page.locator` found in test files):
-  Load: `overview`, `api-request`, `auth-session`, `recurse` (~1,800 lines)
-- **Full UI+API profile** (when `{detected_stack}` is `frontend`/`fullstack` or browser tests detected):
-  Load: all Playwright Utils core fragments (~4,500 lines)
-**Detection**: Scan `{test_dir}` for files containing `page.goto` or `page.locator`. If none found, use API-only profile.
-### Pact.js Utils Loading
-**If `tea_use_pactjs_utils` is enabled** (and `{detected_stack}` is `backend` or `fullstack`, or microservices indicators detected):
-Load: `pactjs-utils-overview.md`, `pactjs-utils-consumer-helpers.md`, `pactjs-utils-provider-verifier.md`, `pactjs-utils-request-filter.md`
-**If `tea_use_pactjs_utils` is disabled** but contract testing is relevant:
-Load: `contract-testing.md`
-### Pact MCP Loading
-**If `tea_pact_mcp` is `"mcp"`:**
-Load: `pact-mcp.md` — enables agent to use SmartBear MCP "Fetch Provider States" and "Matrix" tools to understand existing contract landscape during test design.
-## 4. Load Knowledge Base Fragments
-Use `{knowledgeIndex}` to select and load only relevant fragments.
-### System-Level Mode (Required)
-- `adr-quality-readiness-checklist.md`
-- `test-levels-framework.md`
-- `risk-governance.md`
-- `test-quality.md`
-### Epic-Level Mode (Required)
-- `risk-governance.md`
-- `probability-impact.md`
-- `test-levels-framework.md`
-- `test-priorities-matrix.md`
-**Playwright CLI (if `tea_browser_automation` is "cli" or "auto"):**
-- `playwright-cli.md`
-**MCP Patterns (if `tea_browser_automation` is "mcp" or "auto"):**
-- (existing MCP-related fragments, if any are added in future)
-**Pact.js Utils (if enabled — both System-Level and Epic-Level):**
-- `pactjs-utils-overview.md`, `pactjs-utils-consumer-helpers.md`, `pactjs-utils-provider-verifier.md`, `pactjs-utils-request-filter.md`
-**Contract Testing (if pactjs-utils disabled but relevant):**
-- `contract-testing.md`
-**Pact MCP (if tea_pact_mcp is "mcp"):**
-- `pact-mcp.md`
----
-## 5. Confirm Loaded Inputs
-Summarize what was loaded and confirm with the user if anything is missing.
----
-### 6. Save Progress
-**Save this step's accumulated work to `{outputFile}`.**
-- **If `{outputFile}` does not exist** (first save), create it with YAML frontmatter:
-  ```yaml
-  ---
-  stepsCompleted: ['step-02-load-context']
-  lastStep: 'step-02-load-context'
-  lastSaved: '{date}'
-  ---
-  ```
-  Then write this step's output below the frontmatter.
-- **If `{outputFile}` already exists**, update:
-  - Add `'step-02-load-context'` to `stepsCompleted` array (only if not already present)
-  - Set `lastStep: 'step-02-load-context'`
-  - Set `lastSaved: '{date}'`
-  - Append this step's output to the appropriate section of the document.
-**Update `inputDocuments`**: Set `inputDocuments` in the output template frontmatter to the list of artifact paths loaded in this step (e.g., knowledge fragments, test design documents, configuration files).
-Load next step: `{nextStepFile}`
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-- Step completed in full with required outputs
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-- Skipped sequence steps or missing outputs
-  **Master Rule:** Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.

package/templates/bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/test-design/steps-c/step-03-risk-and-testability.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,110 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-03-risk-and-testability'
-description: 'Perform testability review (system-level) and risk assessment'
-nextStepFile: './step-04-coverage-plan.md'
-outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/test-design-progress.md'
----
-# Step 3: Testability & Risk Assessment
-## STEP GOAL
-Produce a defensible testability review (system-level) and a risk assessment matrix (all modes).
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
-- 📖 Read the entire step file before acting
-- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
-- 🎯 Base conclusions on evidence from loaded artifacts
----
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
-- 💾 Record outputs before proceeding
-- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Available context: config, loaded artifacts, and knowledge fragments
-- Focus: this step's goal only
-- Limits: do not execute future steps
-- Dependencies: prior steps' outputs (if any)
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
-## 1. System-Level Mode: Testability Review
-If **system-level**, evaluate architecture for:
-- **Controllability** (state seeding, mockability, fault injection)
-- **Observability** (logs, metrics, traces, deterministic assertions)
-- **Reliability** (isolation, reproducibility, parallel safety)
-**Structure output as:**
-1. **🚨 Testability Concerns** (actionable issues first)
-2. **✅ Testability Assessment Summary** (what is already strong)
-Also identify **ASRs** (Architecturally Significant Requirements):
-- Mark each as **ACTIONABLE** or **FYI**
----
-## 2. All Modes: Risk Assessment
-Using `risk-governance.md` and `probability-impact.md` (if loaded):
-- Identify real risks (not just features)
-- Classify by category: TECH / SEC / PERF / DATA / BUS / OPS
-- Score Probability (1–3) and Impact (1–3)
-- Calculate Risk Score (P × I)
-- Flag high risks (score ≥ 6)
-- Define mitigation, owner, and timeline
----
-## 3. Summarize Risk Findings
-Summarize the highest risks and their mitigation priorities.
----
-### 4. Save Progress
-**Save this step's accumulated work to `{outputFile}`.**
-- **If `{outputFile}` does not exist** (first save), create it with YAML frontmatter:
-  ```yaml
-  ---
-  stepsCompleted: ['step-03-risk-and-testability']
-  lastStep: 'step-03-risk-and-testability'
-  lastSaved: '{date}'
-  ---
-  ```
-  Then write this step's output below the frontmatter.
-- **If `{outputFile}` already exists**, update:
-  - Add `'step-03-risk-and-testability'` to `stepsCompleted` array (only if not already present)
-  - Set `lastStep: 'step-03-risk-and-testability'`
-  - Set `lastSaved: '{date}'`
-  - Append this step's output to the appropriate section of the document.
-Load next step: `{nextStepFile}`
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-- Step completed in full with required outputs
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-- Skipped sequence steps or missing outputs
-  **Master Rule:** Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.

package/templates/bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/test-design/steps-c/step-04-coverage-plan.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,123 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-04-coverage-plan'
-description: 'Design test coverage, priorities, execution strategy, and estimates'
-nextStepFile: './step-05-generate-output.md'
-outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/test-design-progress.md'
----
-# Step 4: Coverage Plan & Execution Strategy
-## STEP GOAL
-Create the test coverage matrix, prioritize scenarios, and define execution strategy, resource estimates, and quality gates.
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
-- 📖 Read the entire step file before acting
-- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
-- 🚫 Avoid redundant coverage across test levels
----
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
-- 💾 Record outputs before proceeding
-- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-- Available context: config, loaded artifacts, and knowledge fragments
-- Focus: this step's goal only
-- Limits: do not execute future steps
-- Dependencies: prior steps' outputs (if any)
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
-## 1. Coverage Matrix
-For each requirement or risk-driven scenario:
-- Decompose into atomic test scenarios
-- Select **test level** (E2E / API / Component / Unit) using `test-levels-framework.md`
-- Ensure no duplicate coverage across levels
-- Assign priorities (P0–P3) using `test-priorities-matrix.md`
-**Priority rules:**
-- P0: Blocks core functionality + high risk + no workaround
-- P1: Critical paths + medium/high risk
-- P2: Secondary flows + low/medium risk
-- P3: Nice-to-have, exploratory, benchmarks
----
-## 2. Execution Strategy (Keep Simple)
-Use a **PR / Nightly / Weekly** model:
-- **PR**: All functional tests if <15 minutes
-- **Nightly/Weekly**: Long-running or expensive suites (perf, chaos, large datasets)
-- Avoid re-listing all tests (refer to coverage plan)
----
-## 3. Resource Estimates (Ranges Only)
-Provide intervals (no false precision):
-- P0: e.g., "~25–40 hours"
-- P1: e.g., "~20–35 hours"
-- P2: e.g., "~10–30 hours"
-- P3: e.g., "~2–5 hours"
-- Total and timeline as ranges
----
-## 4. Quality Gates
-Define thresholds:
-- P0 pass rate = 100%
-- P1 pass rate ≥ 95%
-- High-risk mitigations complete before release
-- Coverage target ≥ 80% (adjust if justified)
----
-### 5. Save Progress
-**Save this step's accumulated work to `{outputFile}`.**
-- **If `{outputFile}` does not exist** (first save), create it with YAML frontmatter:
-  ```yaml
-  ---
-  stepsCompleted: ['step-04-coverage-plan']
-  lastStep: 'step-04-coverage-plan'
-  lastSaved: '{date}'
-  ---
-  ```
-  Then write this step's output below the frontmatter.
-- **If `{outputFile}` already exists**, update:
-  - Add `'step-04-coverage-plan'` to `stepsCompleted` array (only if not already present)
-  - Set `lastStep: 'step-04-coverage-plan'`
-  - Set `lastSaved: '{date}'`
-  - Append this step's output to the appropriate section of the document.
-Load next step: `{nextStepFile}`
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-- Step completed in full with required outputs
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-- Skipped sequence steps or missing outputs
-  **Master Rule:** Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.