@3fn/core 14.1.0 → 15.0.0

package/dist/consumer-canonical/skills/impeccable/reference/extract-dp.md

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# Extract (DesignerPunk-adapted)
+
+Pull reusable tokens and components from implementation into the design system. This command respects DesignerPunk's token governance.
+
+## Token Governance Rules
+
+**No autonomous token creation.** Extracted tokens are proposals, not decisions. All token creation requires human review.
+
+**Autonomy levels apply:**
+- Semantic tokens: can be proposed freely (verify semantic correctness)
+- Primitive tokens: requires prior context (spec docs) or human acknowledgment
+- Component tokens: requires explicit human approval before creation
+
+**The Formula Rule applies:** Every proposed token must be derivable from a mathematical relationship. If the extracted value doesn't align with the 8px grid or an existing formula pattern, flag it for human review rather than creating an arbitrary token.
+
+## What to extract
+
+- Repeated spacing values that map to existing primitives (validate against 8px grid)
+- Color values that match existing palette primitives (validate against the 45-color system)
+- Typography patterns that align with the three-family system (Rajdhani/Figtree/Commit Mono)
+- Component patterns that could become Stemma components (flag for Lina)
+
+## What NOT to extract
+
+- One-off values that don't align with mathematical relationships
+- Colors outside the existing 9-hue palette (flag as potential palette extension, don't create)
+- Spacing values that break cumulative 8px alignment
+- Component patterns that duplicate existing Stemma components (use the existing one instead)
+
+## Output format
+
+Present extracted proposals as:
+```
+PROPOSED TOKEN:
+  Name: [suggested semantic name]
+  Value: [extracted value]
+  Formula: [mathematical derivation, or "NONE - requires review"]
+  Tier: [primitive | semantic | component]
+  Governance: [free | needs-acknowledgment | needs-approval]
+  Existing match: [closest existing token, if any]
+```
+
+Do not write tokens to source files. Present proposals for human review.

package/dist/consumer-canonical/skills/impeccable/reference/harden.md

@@ -0,0 +1,347 @@
+Designs that only work with perfect data aren't production-ready. Harden the interface against the inputs, errors, languages, and network conditions that real users will throw at it.
+
+## Assess Hardening Needs
+
+Identify weaknesses and edge cases:
+
+1. **Test with extreme inputs**:
+   - Very long text (names, descriptions, titles)
+   - Very short text (empty, single character)
+   - Special characters (emoji, RTL text, accents)
+   - Large numbers (millions, billions)
+   - Many items (1000+ list items, 50+ options)
+   - No data (empty states)
+
+2. **Test error scenarios**:
+   - Network failures (offline, slow, timeout)
+   - API errors (400, 401, 403, 404, 500)
+   - Validation errors
+   - Permission errors
+   - Rate limiting
+   - Concurrent operations
+
+3. **Test internationalization**:
+   - Long translations (German is often 30% longer than English)
+   - RTL languages (Arabic, Hebrew)
+   - Character sets (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, emoji)
+   - Date/time formats
+   - Number formats (1,000 vs 1.000)
+   - Currency symbols
+
+**CRITICAL**: Designs that only work with perfect data aren't production-ready. Harden against reality.
+
+## Hardening Dimensions
+
+Systematically improve resilience:
+
+### Text Overflow & Wrapping
+
+**Long text handling**:
+```css
+/* Single line with ellipsis */
+.truncate {
+  overflow: hidden;
+  text-overflow: ellipsis;
+  white-space: nowrap;
+}
+
+/* Multi-line with clamp */
+.line-clamp {
+  display: -webkit-box;
+  -webkit-line-clamp: 3;
+  -webkit-box-orient: vertical;
+  overflow: hidden;
+}
+
+/* Allow wrapping */
+.wrap {
+  word-wrap: break-word;
+  overflow-wrap: break-word;
+  hyphens: auto;
+}
+```
+
+**Flex/Grid overflow**:
+```css
+/* Prevent flex items from overflowing */
+.flex-item {
+  min-width: 0; /* Allow shrinking below content size */
+  overflow: hidden;
+}
+
+/* Prevent grid items from overflowing */
+.grid-item {
+  min-width: 0;
+  min-height: 0;
+}
+```
+
+**Responsive text sizing**:
+- Use `clamp()` for fluid typography
+- Set minimum readable sizes (14px on mobile)
+- Test text scaling (zoom to 200%)
+- Ensure containers expand with text
+
+### Internationalization (i18n)
+
+**Text expansion**:
+- Add 30-40% space budget for translations
+- Use flexbox/grid that adapts to content
+- Test with longest language (usually German)
+- Avoid fixed widths on text containers
+
+```jsx
+// ❌ Bad: Assumes short English text
+<button className="w-24">Submit</button>
+
+// ✅ Good: Adapts to content
+<button className="px-4 py-2">Submit</button>
+```
+
+**RTL (Right-to-Left) support**:
+```css
+/* Use logical properties */
+margin-inline-start: 1rem; /* Not margin-left */
+padding-inline: 1rem; /* Not padding-left/right */
+border-inline-end: 1px solid; /* Not border-right */
+
+/* Or use dir attribute */
+[dir="rtl"] .arrow { transform: scaleX(-1); }
+```
+
+**Character set support**:
+- Use UTF-8 encoding everywhere
+- Test with Chinese/Japanese/Korean (CJK) characters
+- Test with emoji (they can be 2-4 bytes)
+- Handle different scripts (Latin, Cyrillic, Arabic, etc.)
+
+**Date/Time formatting**:
+```javascript
+// ✅ Use Intl API for proper formatting
+new Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-US').format(date); // 1/15/2024
+new Intl.DateTimeFormat('de-DE').format(date); // 15.1.2024
+
+new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US', { 
+  style: 'currency', 
+  currency: 'USD' 
+}).format(1234.56); // $1,234.56
+```
+
+**Pluralization**:
+```javascript
+// ❌ Bad: Assumes English pluralization
+`${count} item${count !== 1 ? 's' : ''}`
+
+// ✅ Good: Use proper i18n library
+t('items', { count }) // Handles complex plural rules
+```
+
+### Error Handling
+
+**Network errors**:
+- Show clear error messages
+- Provide retry button
+- Explain what happened
+- Offer offline mode (if applicable)
+- Handle timeout scenarios
+
+```jsx
+// Error states with recovery
+{error && (
+  <ErrorMessage>
+    <p>Failed to load data. {error.message}</p>
+    <button onClick={retry}>Try again</button>
+  </ErrorMessage>
+)}
+```
+
+**Form validation errors**:
+- Inline errors near fields
+- Clear, specific messages
+- Suggest corrections
+- Don't block submission unnecessarily
+- Preserve user input on error
+
+**API errors**:
+- Handle each status code appropriately
+  - 400: Show validation errors
+  - 401: Redirect to login
+  - 403: Show permission error
+  - 404: Show not found state
+  - 429: Show rate limit message
+  - 500: Show generic error, offer support
+
+**Graceful degradation**:
+- Core functionality works without JavaScript
+- Images have alt text
+- Progressive enhancement
+- Fallbacks for unsupported features
+
+### Edge Cases & Boundary Conditions
+
+**Empty states**:
+- No items in list
+- No search results
+- No notifications
+- No data to display
+- Provide clear next action
+
+**Loading states**:
+- Initial load
+- Pagination load
+- Refresh
+- Show what's loading ("Loading your projects...")
+- Time estimates for long operations
+
+**Large datasets**:
+- Pagination or virtual scrolling
+- Search/filter capabilities
+- Performance optimization
+- Don't load all 10,000 items at once
+
+**Concurrent operations**:
+- Prevent double-submission (disable button while loading)
+- Handle race conditions
+- Optimistic updates with rollback
+- Conflict resolution
+
+**Permission states**:
+- No permission to view
+- No permission to edit
+- Read-only mode
+- Clear explanation of why
+
+**Browser compatibility**:
+- Polyfills for modern features
+- Fallbacks for unsupported CSS
+- Feature detection (not browser detection)
+- Test in target browsers
+
+### Input Validation & Sanitization
+
+**Client-side validation**:
+- Required fields
+- Format validation (email, phone, URL)
+- Length limits
+- Pattern matching
+- Custom validation rules
+
+**Server-side validation** (always):
+- Never trust client-side only
+- Validate and sanitize all inputs
+- Protect against injection attacks
+- Rate limiting
+
+**Constraint handling**:
+```html
+<!-- Set clear constraints -->
+<input 
+  type="text"
+  maxlength="100"
+  pattern="[A-Za-z0-9]+"
+  required
+  aria-describedby="username-hint"
+/>
+<small id="username-hint">
+  Letters and numbers only, up to 100 characters
+</small>
+```
+
+### Accessibility Resilience
+
+**Keyboard navigation**:
+- All functionality accessible via keyboard
+- Logical tab order
+- Focus management in modals
+- Skip links for long content
+
+**Screen reader support**:
+- Proper ARIA labels
+- Announce dynamic changes (live regions)
+- Descriptive alt text
+- Semantic HTML
+
+**Motion sensitivity**:
+```css
+@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
+  * {
+    animation-duration: 0.01ms !important;
+    animation-iteration-count: 1 !important;
+    transition-duration: 0.01ms !important;
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**High contrast mode**:
+- Test in Windows high contrast mode
+- Don't rely only on color
+- Provide alternative visual cues
+
+### Performance Resilience
+
+**Slow connections**:
+- Progressive image loading
+- Skeleton screens
+- Optimistic UI updates
+- Offline support (service workers)
+
+**Memory leaks**:
+- Clean up event listeners
+- Cancel subscriptions
+- Clear timers/intervals
+- Abort pending requests on unmount
+
+**Throttling & Debouncing**:
+```javascript
+// Debounce search input
+const debouncedSearch = debounce(handleSearch, 300);
+
+// Throttle scroll handler
+const throttledScroll = throttle(handleScroll, 100);
+```
+
+## Testing Strategies
+
+**Manual testing**:
+- Test with extreme data (very long, very short, empty)
+- Test in different languages
+- Test offline
+- Test slow connection (throttle to 3G)
+- Test with screen reader
+- Test keyboard-only navigation
+- Test on old browsers
+
+**Automated testing**:
+- Unit tests for edge cases
+- Integration tests for error scenarios
+- E2E tests for critical paths
+- Visual regression tests
+- Accessibility tests (axe, WAVE)
+
+**IMPORTANT**: Hardening is about expecting the unexpected. Real users will do things you never imagined.
+
+**NEVER**:
+- Assume perfect input (validate everything)
+- Ignore internationalization (design for global)
+- Leave error messages generic ("Error occurred")
+- Forget offline scenarios
+- Trust client-side validation alone
+- Use fixed widths for text
+- Assume English-length text
+- Block entire interface when one component errors
+
+## Verify Hardening
+
+Test thoroughly with edge cases:
+
+- **Long text**: Try names with 100+ characters
+- **Emoji**: Use emoji in all text fields
+- **RTL**: Test with Arabic or Hebrew
+- **CJK**: Test with Chinese/Japanese/Korean
+- **Network issues**: Disable internet, throttle connection
+- **Large datasets**: Test with 1000+ items
+- **Concurrent actions**: Click submit 10 times rapidly
+- **Errors**: Force API errors, test all error states
+- **Empty**: Remove all data, test empty states
+
+When edge cases are covered, hand off to `/impeccable polish` for the final pass.

package/dist/consumer-canonical/skills/impeccable/reference/heuristics-scoring.md

@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+# Heuristics Scoring Guide
+
+Score each of Nielsen's 10 Usability Heuristics on a 0–4 scale. Be honest: a 4 means genuinely excellent, not "good enough."
+
+## Nielsen's 10 Heuristics
+
+### 1. Visibility of System Status
+
+Keep users informed about what's happening through timely, appropriate feedback.
+
+**Check for**:
+- Loading indicators during async operations
+- Confirmation of user actions (save, submit, delete)
+- Progress indicators for multi-step processes
+- Current location in navigation (breadcrumbs, active states)
+- Form validation feedback (inline, not just on submit)
+
+**Scoring**:
+| Score | Criteria |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | No feedback; user is guessing what happened |
+| 1 | Rare feedback; most actions produce no visible response |
+| 2 | Partial; some states communicated, major gaps remain |
+| 3 | Good; most operations give clear feedback, minor gaps |
+| 4 | Excellent; every action confirms, progress is always visible |
+
+### 2. Match Between System and Real World
+
+Speak the user's language. Follow real-world conventions. Information appears in natural, logical order.
+
+**Check for**:
+- Familiar terminology (no unexplained jargon)
+- Logical information order matching user expectations
+- Recognizable icons and metaphors
+- Domain-appropriate language for the target audience
+- Natural reading flow (left-to-right, top-to-bottom priority)
+
+**Scoring**:
+| Score | Criteria |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | Pure tech jargon, alien to users |
+| 1 | Mostly confusing; requires domain expertise to navigate |
+| 2 | Mixed; some plain language, some jargon leaks through |
+| 3 | Mostly natural; occasional term needs context |
+| 4 | Speaks the user's language fluently throughout |
+
+### 3. User Control and Freedom
+
+Users need a clear "emergency exit" from unwanted states without extended dialogue.
+
+**Check for**:
+- Undo/redo functionality
+- Cancel buttons on forms and modals
+- Clear navigation back to safety (home, previous)
+- Easy way to clear filters, search, selections
+- Escape from long or multi-step processes
+
+**Scoring**:
+| Score | Criteria |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | Users get trapped; no way out without refreshing |
+| 1 | Difficult exits; must find obscure paths to escape |
+| 2 | Some exits; main flows have escape, edge cases don't |
+| 3 | Good control; users can exit and undo most actions |
+| 4 | Full control; undo, cancel, back, and escape everywhere |
+
+### 4. Consistency and Standards
+
+Users shouldn't wonder whether different words, situations, or actions mean the same thing.
+
+**Check for**:
+- Consistent terminology throughout the interface
+- Same actions produce same results everywhere
+- Platform conventions followed (standard UI patterns)
+- Visual consistency (colors, typography, spacing, components)
+- Consistent interaction patterns (same gesture = same behavior)
+
+**Scoring**:
+| Score | Criteria |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | Inconsistent everywhere; feels like different products stitched together |
+| 1 | Many inconsistencies; similar things look/behave differently |
+| 2 | Partially consistent; main flows match, details diverge |
+| 3 | Mostly consistent; occasional deviation, nothing confusing |
+| 4 | Fully consistent; cohesive system, predictable behavior |
+
+### 5. Error Prevention
+
+Better than good error messages is a design that prevents problems in the first place.
+
+**Check for**:
+- Confirmation before destructive actions (delete, overwrite)
+- Constraints preventing invalid input (date pickers, dropdowns)
+- Smart defaults that reduce errors
+- Clear labels that prevent misunderstanding
+- Autosave and draft recovery
+
+**Scoring**:
+| Score | Criteria |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | Errors easy to make; no guardrails anywhere |
+| 1 | Few safeguards; some inputs validated, most aren't |
+| 2 | Partial prevention; common errors caught, edge cases slip |
+| 3 | Good prevention; most error paths blocked proactively |
+| 4 | Excellent; errors nearly impossible through smart constraints |
+
+### 6. Recognition Rather Than Recall
+
+Minimize memory load. Make objects, actions, and options visible or easily retrievable.
+
+**Check for**:
+- Visible options (not buried in hidden menus)
+- Contextual help when needed (tooltips, inline hints)
+- Recent items and history
+- Autocomplete and suggestions
+- Labels on icons (not icon-only navigation)
+
+**Scoring**:
+| Score | Criteria |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | Heavy memorization; users must remember paths and commands |
+| 1 | Mostly recall; many hidden features, few visible cues |
+| 2 | Some aids; main actions visible, secondary features hidden |
+| 3 | Good recognition; most things discoverable, few memory demands |
+| 4 | Everything discoverable; users never need to memorize |
+
+### 7. Flexibility and Efficiency of Use
+
+Accelerators, invisible to novices, speed up expert interaction.
+
+**Check for**:
+- Keyboard shortcuts for common actions
+- Customizable interface elements
+- Recent items and favorites
+- Bulk/batch actions
+- Power user features that don't complicate the basics
+
+**Scoring**:
+| Score | Criteria |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | One rigid path; no shortcuts or alternatives |
+| 1 | Limited flexibility; few alternatives to the main path |
+| 2 | Some shortcuts; basic keyboard support, limited bulk actions |
+| 3 | Good accelerators; keyboard nav, some customization |
+| 4 | Highly flexible; multiple paths, power features, customizable |
+
+### 8. Aesthetic and Minimalist Design
+
+Interfaces should not contain irrelevant or rarely needed information. Every element should serve a purpose.
+
+**Check for**:
+- Only necessary information visible at each step
+- Clear visual hierarchy directing attention
+- Purposeful use of color and emphasis
+- No decorative clutter competing for attention
+- Focused, uncluttered layouts
+
+**Scoring**:
+| Score | Criteria |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | Overwhelming; everything competes for attention equally |
+| 1 | Cluttered; too much noise, hard to find what matters |
+| 2 | Some clutter; main content clear, periphery noisy |
+| 3 | Mostly clean; focused design, minor visual noise |
+| 4 | Perfectly minimal; every element earns its pixel |
+
+### 9. Help Users Recognize, Diagnose, and Recover from Errors
+
+Error messages should use plain language, precisely indicate the problem, and constructively suggest a solution.
+
+**Check for**:
+- Plain language error messages (no error codes for users)
+- Specific problem identification ("Email is missing @" not "Invalid input")
+- Actionable recovery suggestions
+- Errors displayed near the source of the problem
+- Non-blocking error handling (don't wipe the form)
+
+**Scoring**:
+| Score | Criteria |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | Cryptic errors; codes, jargon, or no message at all |
+| 1 | Vague errors; "Something went wrong" with no guidance |
+| 2 | Clear but unhelpful; names the problem but not the fix |
+| 3 | Clear with suggestions; identifies problem and offers next steps |
+| 4 | Perfect recovery; pinpoints issue, suggests fix, preserves user work |
+
+### 10. Help and Documentation
+
+Even if the system is usable without docs, help should be easy to find, task-focused, and concise.
+
+**Check for**:
+- Searchable help or documentation
+- Contextual help (tooltips, inline hints, guided tours)
+- Task-focused organization (not feature-organized)
+- Concise, scannable content
+- Easy access without leaving current context
+
+**Scoring**:
+| Score | Criteria |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | No help available anywhere |
+| 1 | Help exists but hard to find or irrelevant |
+| 2 | Basic help; FAQ or docs exist, not contextual |
+| 3 | Good documentation; searchable, mostly task-focused |
+| 4 | Excellent contextual help; right info at the right moment |
+
+---
+
+## Score Summary
+
+**Total possible**: 40 points (10 heuristics × 4 max)
+
+| Score Range | Rating | What It Means |
+|-------------|--------|---------------|
+| 36–40 | Excellent | Minor polish only; ship it |
+| 28–35 | Good | Address weak areas, solid foundation |
+| 20–27 | Acceptable | Significant improvements needed before users are happy |
+| 12–19 | Poor | Major UX overhaul required; core experience broken |
+| 0–11 | Critical | Redesign needed; unusable in current state |
+
+---
+
+## Issue Severity (P0–P3)
+
+Tag each individual issue found during scoring with a priority level:
+
+| Priority | Name | Description | Action |
+|----------|------|-------------|--------|
+| **P0** | Blocking | Prevents task completion entirely | Fix immediately; this is a showstopper |
+| **P1** | Major | Causes significant difficulty or confusion | Fix before release |
+| **P2** | Minor | Annoyance, but workaround exists | Fix in next pass |
+| **P3** | Polish | Nice-to-fix, no real user impact | Fix if time permits |
+
+**Tip**: If you're unsure between two levels, ask: "Would a user contact support about this?" If yes, it's at least P1.