@3fn/core 14.1.0 → 15.0.0

package/src/figma/VariantAnalyzer.ts

@@ -1,712 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * VariantAnalyzer — Analyzes Figma variants with context-aware recommendations.
- *
- * Queries Component-Family docs and Component-Readiness-Status via
- * DesignerPunk MCP, analyzes behavioral vs styling differences, and
- * generates mapping recommendations with conflict detection.
- *
- * @see Design: .kiro/specs/054b-figma-design-extract/design.md
- * @requirements Req 4 (Variant Analysis)
- */
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Types
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-/** Minimal Figma variant representation for analysis. */
-export interface FigmaVariant {
-  name: string;
-  properties: Record<string, string>;
-  /** Whether this variant has interactive behavior (onClick, onHover, etc.). */
-  hasInteraction?: boolean;
-  /** Visual-only property keys (colors, sizes, spacing). */
-  visualProperties?: string[];
-}
-
-/** Minimal Figma component representation used by the analyzer. */
-export interface FigmaComponent {
-  name: string;
-  description?: string;
-  variants: FigmaVariant[];
-  states?: string[];
-}
-
-/** Pattern extracted from a Component-Family steering doc. */
-export interface FamilyPattern {
-  familyName: string;
-  inheritancePattern: string;
-  behavioralContracts: string[];
-  tokenUsagePatterns: string[];
-  /** Raw doc content for additional context. */
-  rawContent?: string;
-}
-
-/** Status of an existing component in the design system. */
-export interface ComponentStatus {
-  name: string;
-  status: 'implemented' | 'planned' | 'deprecated' | 'unknown';
-  platform?: string;
-  path?: string;
-}
-
-/** Context gathered from DesignerPunk MCP for extraction. */
-export interface ExtractionContext {
-  familyPattern: FamilyPattern | null;
-  existingComponents: ComponentStatus[];
-}
-
-/** A single mapping recommendation (Option A or Option B). */
-export interface MappingRecommendation {
-  option: string;
-  description: string;
-  rationale: string;
-  recommended: boolean;
-  alignsWith: string[];
-  tradeoffs: string[];
-}
-
-/** A conflict between family-pattern and behavioral-analysis recommendations. */
-export interface MappingConflict {
-  familyRecommendation: string;
-  behavioralRecommendation: string;
-  explanation: string;
-}
-
-/** Complete variant analysis result. */
-export interface VariantMapping {
-  componentName: string;
-  behavioralClassification: 'behavioral' | 'styling';
-  recommendations: MappingRecommendation[];
-  conflicts: MappingConflict[];
-  familyPattern: FamilyPattern | null;
-  existingComponents: ComponentStatus[];
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// MCP client interface (minimal contract for doc queries)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-/**
- * Minimal MCP client interface for querying DesignerPunk documentation.
- *
- * Concrete implementations will call the DesignerPunk MCP server's
- * `get_document_full` and `get_section` tools.
- */
-export interface MCPDocClient {
-  getDocumentFull(path: string): Promise<string | null>;
-  getSection(path: string, heading: string): Promise<string | null>;
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// VariantAnalyzer
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-export class VariantAnalyzer {
-  constructor(private readonly mcp: MCPDocClient) {}
-
-  /**
-   * Query a Component-Family doc via DesignerPunk MCP and extract the
-   * inheritance pattern, behavioral contracts, and token usage patterns.
-   *
-   * Returns `null` when the doc does not exist (caller should flag for
-   * recommendation to create the doc).
-   */
-  async queryFamilyPattern(familyName: string): Promise<FamilyPattern | null> {
-    const docPath = `governance/Component-Family-${familyName}.md`;
-    const content = await this.mcp.getDocumentFull(docPath);
-
-    if (content === null) {
-      return null;
-    }
-
-    const inheritancePattern = this.extractSection(content, 'Inheritance Structure');
-    const behavioralContracts = this.extractBehavioralContracts(content);
-    const tokenUsagePatterns = this.extractTokenUsagePatterns(content);
-
-    return {
-      familyName,
-      inheritancePattern,
-      behavioralContracts,
-      tokenUsagePatterns,
-      rawContent: content,
-    };
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Query Component-Readiness-Status via DesignerPunk MCP and return the
-   * status of components belonging to the given family.
-   *
-   * Parses the markdown table under "Individual Component Status" and
-   * filters rows whose Family column matches `familyName` (case-insensitive).
-   *
-   * Returns an empty array when the section is unavailable or contains no
-   * matching components.
-   */
-  async queryExistingComponents(familyName: string): Promise<ComponentStatus[]> {
-    const docPath = 'governance/Component-Readiness-Status.md';
-    const section = await this.mcp.getSection(docPath, 'Individual Component Status');
-
-    if (section === null) {
-      return [];
-    }
-
-    return this.parseComponentStatusTable(section, familyName);
-  }
-
-  // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-  // Table parsing helpers
-  // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-  /**
-   * Parse the Component-Readiness-Status markdown table and return entries
-   * whose Family column matches `familyName` (case-insensitive).
-   *
-   * Expected table format:
-   * | Component | Family | Status | Implementation Path |
-   * |-----------|--------|--------|---------------------|
-   * | ButtonCTA | Buttons | 🟢 Production Ready | `src/components/...` |
-   */
-  private parseComponentStatusTable(
-    content: string,
-    familyName: string,
-  ): ComponentStatus[] {
-    const results: ComponentStatus[] = [];
-    const lowerFamily = familyName.toLowerCase();
-
-    // Match table rows: | col1 | col2 | col3 | col4 |
-    const rowPattern = /^\|([^|]+)\|([^|]+)\|([^|]+)\|([^|]+)\|/gm;
-    let match: RegExpExecArray | null;
-
-    while ((match = rowPattern.exec(content)) !== null) {
-      const componentName = match[1].trim();
-      const family = match[2].trim();
-      const statusCell = match[3].trim();
-      const pathCell = match[4].trim();
-
-      // Skip header row and separator row
-      if (
-        componentName === 'Component' ||
-        componentName.startsWith('-')
-      ) {
-        continue;
-      }
-
-      // Filter by family (case-insensitive)
-      if (family.toLowerCase() !== lowerFamily) {
-        continue;
-      }
-
-      // Extract implementation path from backtick-wrapped value
-      const pathMatch = pathCell.match(/`([^`]+)`/);
-      const implPath = pathMatch ? pathMatch[1] : undefined;
-
-      results.push({
-        name: componentName,
-        status: this.parseStatusEmoji(statusCell),
-        path: implPath,
-      });
-    }
-
-    return results;
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Map status emoji indicators to ComponentStatus status values.
-   *
-   * 🟢 Production Ready → 'implemented'
-   * 🟡 Beta             → 'implemented'
-   * ⚠️ Deprecated        → 'deprecated'
-   * 🔴 Planned          → 'planned'
-   * Anything else       → 'unknown'
-   */
-  private parseStatusEmoji(statusCell: string): ComponentStatus['status'] {
-    if (statusCell.includes('Production Ready')) return 'implemented';
-    if (statusCell.includes('Beta')) return 'implemented';
-    if (statusCell.includes('Deprecated')) return 'deprecated';
-    if (statusCell.includes('Planned')) return 'planned';
-    return 'unknown';
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Classify whether a set of variants differ in behavior or only in styling.
-   *
-   * A variant set is classified as 'behavioral' when at least one variant
-   * has interactive behavior (`hasInteraction`) while another does not, or
-   * when variants expose structurally different property sets (indicating
-   * different component contracts). Otherwise the differences are purely
-   * visual ('styling').
-   *
-   * @param variants - The Figma variants to analyze.
-   * @returns 'behavioral' when interaction patterns differ, 'styling' when
-   *          only visual properties change across variants.
-   */
-  analyzeBehavioralDifferences(variants: FigmaVariant[]): 'behavioral' | 'styling' {
-    if (variants.length <= 1) return 'styling';
-
-    // --- Check 1: Interaction pattern divergence ---
-    // If some variants are interactive and others are not, the difference
-    // is behavioral (e.g., a disabled variant that removes onClick).
-    const interactionFlags = variants.map((v) => Boolean(v.hasInteraction));
-    const hasInteractive = interactionFlags.some((f) => f);
-    const hasNonInteractive = interactionFlags.some((f) => !f);
-
-    if (hasInteractive && hasNonInteractive) {
-      return 'behavioral';
-    }
-
-    // --- Check 2: Structural property divergence ---
-    // If variants expose different property *keys* (not just different
-    // values), they likely represent different behavioral contracts.
-    // Visual-only differences share the same property keys with different
-    // values (e.g., color: red vs color: blue).
-    const propertySets = variants.map((v) => {
-      const keys = Object.keys(v.properties).sort();
-      return keys.join(',');
-    });
-
-    const uniquePropertySets = new Set(propertySets);
-    if (uniquePropertySets.size > 1) {
-      return 'behavioral';
-    }
-
-    // All variants share the same property keys and interaction pattern —
-    // differences are purely visual (colors, sizes, spacing).
-    return 'styling';
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Generate mapping recommendations for how Figma variants should map to
-   * DesignerPunk component structure.
-   *
-   * Always produces two options:
-   *   - Option A: Single component with a variant prop (simpler API surface).
-   *   - Option B: Primitive + semantic component structure (Stemma pattern).
-   *
-   * The recommended option is chosen based on:
-   *   1. Family pattern alignment (if a Component-Family doc exists).
-   *   2. Behavioral analysis classification ('behavioral' favours split,
-   *      'styling' favours single component).
-   *   3. Existing component landscape (avoid duplication).
-   *
-   * @param familyPattern - Pattern from Component-Family doc, or null if none exists.
-   * @param behavioralAnalysis - 'behavioral' or 'styling' classification.
-   * @param existingComponents - Already-implemented components in the family.
-   * @returns Two MappingRecommendation entries (Option A and Option B).
-   *
-   * @requirements Req 4
-   */
-  generateRecommendations(
-    familyPattern: FamilyPattern | null,
-    behavioralAnalysis: 'behavioral' | 'styling',
-    existingComponents: ComponentStatus[],
-  ): MappingRecommendation[] {
-    const hasExistingPrimitive = existingComponents.some(
-      (c) => c.status === 'implemented' && /base|primitive/i.test(c.name),
-    );
-
-    // --- Determine which option to recommend ---
-    // Family pattern takes priority when available.
-    let recommendA: boolean;
-
-    if (familyPattern) {
-      const patternLower = familyPattern.inheritancePattern.toLowerCase();
-      // Family docs that describe "primitive + semantic" or "base + variant"
-      // patterns align with Option B (split structure).
-      const familyFavoursSplit =
-        patternLower.includes('primitive') ||
-        patternLower.includes('base') ||
-        patternLower.includes('semantic');
-
-      recommendA = !familyFavoursSplit;
-    } else {
-      // No family doc — lean on behavioral analysis.
-      recommendA = behavioralAnalysis === 'styling';
-    }
-
-    // If behavioral analysis says 'behavioral' and there's already a
-    // primitive/base component, strongly favour the split structure
-    // regardless of family pattern to avoid duplicating the base.
-    if (behavioralAnalysis === 'behavioral' && hasExistingPrimitive) {
-      recommendA = false;
-    }
-
-    // --- Build Option A: Single component with variant prop ---
-    const optionA: MappingRecommendation = {
-      option: 'A',
-      description: 'Single component with a variant prop',
-      rationale:
-        behavioralAnalysis === 'styling'
-          ? 'Variants differ only in visual styling, making a single component with a variant prop the simplest API surface.'
-          : 'A single component keeps the API surface small, though behavioral differences may complicate the internal implementation.',
-      recommended: recommendA,
-      alignsWith: this.buildAlignsWith('A', familyPattern, behavioralAnalysis, existingComponents),
-      tradeoffs: [
-        'Simpler consumer API — one import, one tag.',
-        'Internal complexity grows if behavioral differences emerge later.',
-        'Harder to tree-shake unused variants.',
-      ],
-    };
-
-    // --- Build Option B: Primitive + semantic structure ---
-    const optionB: MappingRecommendation = {
-      option: 'B',
-      description: 'Primitive + semantic component structure (Stemma pattern)',
-      rationale:
-        behavioralAnalysis === 'behavioral'
-          ? 'Variants exhibit behavioral differences that map naturally to separate components sharing a primitive base.'
-          : 'A split structure future-proofs the component for behavioral divergence, though current variants are styling-only.',
-      recommended: !recommendA,
-      alignsWith: this.buildAlignsWith('B', familyPattern, behavioralAnalysis, existingComponents),
-      tradeoffs: [
-        'Clean separation of behavioral contracts per component.',
-        'Aligns with Stemma inheritance pattern used across DesignerPunk.',
-        'More components to maintain and document.',
-      ],
-    };
-
-    return [optionA, optionB];
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Build the `alignsWith` list for a given option, describing which
-   * evidence supports the recommendation.
-   */
-  private buildAlignsWith(
-    option: 'A' | 'B',
-    familyPattern: FamilyPattern | null,
-    behavioralAnalysis: 'behavioral' | 'styling',
-    existingComponents: ComponentStatus[],
-  ): string[] {
-    const alignments: string[] = [];
-
-    // Behavioral analysis alignment
-    if (option === 'A' && behavioralAnalysis === 'styling') {
-      alignments.push('Behavioral analysis: variants are styling-only');
-    } else if (option === 'B' && behavioralAnalysis === 'behavioral') {
-      alignments.push('Behavioral analysis: variants have behavioral differences');
-    }
-
-    // Family pattern alignment
-    if (familyPattern) {
-      const patternLower = familyPattern.inheritancePattern.toLowerCase();
-      const familyFavoursSplit =
-        patternLower.includes('primitive') ||
-        patternLower.includes('base') ||
-        patternLower.includes('semantic');
-
-      if (option === 'B' && familyFavoursSplit) {
-        alignments.push(`Family pattern (${familyPattern.familyName}): uses primitive/semantic inheritance`);
-      } else if (option === 'A' && !familyFavoursSplit) {
-        alignments.push(`Family pattern (${familyPattern.familyName}): single-component pattern`);
-      }
-    }
-
-    // Existing component alignment
-    const hasExistingPrimitive = existingComponents.some(
-      (c) => c.status === 'implemented' && /base|primitive/i.test(c.name),
-    );
-    if (option === 'B' && hasExistingPrimitive) {
-      const baseName = existingComponents.find(
-        (c) => c.status === 'implemented' && /base|primitive/i.test(c.name),
-      )?.name;
-      alignments.push(`Existing primitive component: ${baseName} already implemented`);
-    }
-
-    return alignments;
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Detect conflicts between family-pattern and behavioral-analysis
-   * recommendations.
-   *
-   * A conflict exists when the family pattern suggests one architectural
-   * approach (e.g. single component) but the behavioral analysis suggests
-   * the opposite (e.g. split structure), or vice-versa.
-   *
-   * @param familyRecommendation - The option favoured by the family pattern
-   *   (e.g. "single component" or "primitive + semantic"). Pass an empty
-   *   string when no family doc exists (no conflict possible without a
-   *   family opinion).
-   * @param behavioralRecommendation - The option favoured by behavioral
-   *   analysis (e.g. "single component" or "primitive + semantic").
-   * @returns An array of conflicts (empty when recommendations agree or
-   *   when no family pattern exists).
-   */
-  detectConflicts(
-    familyRecommendation: string,
-    behavioralRecommendation: string,
-  ): MappingConflict[] {
-    // No family doc → nothing to conflict with.
-    if (!familyRecommendation) return [];
-
-    const normFamily = familyRecommendation.trim().toLowerCase();
-    const normBehavioral = behavioralRecommendation.trim().toLowerCase();
-
-    // If both sides agree (or either is empty), no conflict.
-    if (!normFamily || !normBehavioral) return [];
-    if (normFamily === normBehavioral) return [];
-
-    // Classify each recommendation into a canonical bucket so we can
-    // detect semantic equivalence even when wording differs.
-    const familyBucket = this.classifyRecommendation(normFamily);
-    const behavioralBucket = this.classifyRecommendation(normBehavioral);
-
-    // Same bucket → no meaningful conflict.
-    if (familyBucket === behavioralBucket) return [];
-
-    // Build a human-readable explanation of the disagreement.
-    const explanation = this.buildConflictExplanation(
-      familyRecommendation,
-      behavioralRecommendation,
-      familyBucket,
-      behavioralBucket,
-    );
-
-    return [
-      {
-        familyRecommendation,
-        behavioralRecommendation,
-        explanation,
-      },
-    ];
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Classify a recommendation string into a canonical bucket.
-   *
-   * Returns `'single'` for single-component approaches, `'split'` for
-   * primitive + semantic / base + variant approaches, or `'unknown'` when
-   * the wording doesn't match either pattern.
-   */
-  private classifyRecommendation(rec: string): 'single' | 'split' | 'unknown' {
-    const singleIndicators = ['single component', 'variant prop', 'option a', 'one component'];
-    const splitIndicators = [
-      'primitive',
-      'semantic',
-      'base',
-      'split',
-      'option b',
-      'separate component',
-      'stemma',
-    ];
-
-    const matchesSingle = singleIndicators.some((ind) => rec.includes(ind));
-    const matchesSplit = splitIndicators.some((ind) => rec.includes(ind));
-
-    if (matchesSingle && !matchesSplit) return 'single';
-    if (matchesSplit && !matchesSingle) return 'split';
-    // Ambiguous or unrecognised — treat as unknown so we still flag the
-    // textual difference as a conflict.
-    return 'unknown';
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Build a human-readable conflict explanation.
-   */
-  private buildConflictExplanation(
-    familyRec: string,
-    behavioralRec: string,
-    familyBucket: 'single' | 'split' | 'unknown',
-    behavioralBucket: 'single' | 'split' | 'unknown',
-  ): string {
-    const familyLabel =
-      familyBucket === 'single'
-        ? 'a single component with variant prop'
-        : familyBucket === 'split'
-          ? 'a primitive + semantic split structure'
-          : `"${familyRec}"`;
-
-    const behavioralLabel =
-      behavioralBucket === 'single'
-        ? 'a single component (variants are styling-only)'
-        : behavioralBucket === 'split'
-          ? 'separate components (variants have behavioral differences)'
-          : `"${behavioralRec}"`;
-
-    return (
-      `Component-Family pattern recommends ${familyLabel}, ` +
-      `but behavioral analysis recommends ${behavioralLabel}. ` +
-      'Human review is required to resolve this architectural disagreement.'
-    );
-  }
-
-
-
-
-
-  /**
-   * Analyze a Figma component's variants and produce mapping recommendations.
-   *
-   * Orchestrates family-pattern lookup, existing-component lookup,
-   * behavioral analysis, recommendation generation, and conflict detection.
-   */
-  /**
-     * Analyze a Figma component's variants and produce mapping recommendations.
-     *
-     * Orchestrates family-pattern lookup, existing-component lookup,
-     * behavioral analysis, recommendation generation, and conflict detection.
-     */
-    async analyzeVariants(
-      component: FigmaComponent,
-      context: ExtractionContext,
-    ): Promise<VariantMapping> {
-      // 1. Derive family name from component name (e.g. "ButtonCTA" → "Button")
-      const familyName = component.name.replace(
-        /(?:Base|CTA|Primary|Secondary|Tertiary|Default|Large|Small|Medium)$/i,
-        '',
-      ) || component.name;
-
-      // 2. Use context if available, otherwise query MCP directly
-      const familyPattern =
-        context.familyPattern !== undefined
-          ? context.familyPattern
-          : await this.queryFamilyPattern(familyName);
-
-      const existingComponents =
-        context.existingComponents.length > 0
-          ? context.existingComponents
-          : await this.queryExistingComponents(familyName);
-
-      // 3. Classify behavioral vs styling differences
-      const behavioralClassification = this.analyzeBehavioralDifferences(
-        component.variants,
-      );
-
-      // 4. Generate recommendations from all analysis results
-      const recommendations = this.generateRecommendations(
-        familyPattern,
-        behavioralClassification,
-        existingComponents,
-      );
-
-      // 5. Derive recommendation strings for conflict detection
-      const familyRecommendation = familyPattern
-        ? ((): string => {
-            const p = familyPattern.inheritancePattern.toLowerCase();
-            if (p.includes('primitive') || p.includes('base') || p.includes('semantic')) {
-              return 'primitive + semantic';
-            }
-            return 'single component';
-          })()
-        : '';
-
-      const behavioralRecommendation =
-        behavioralClassification === 'behavioral'
-          ? 'primitive + semantic'
-          : 'single component';
-
-      // 6. Detect conflicts between family pattern and behavioral analysis
-      const conflicts = this.detectConflicts(
-        familyRecommendation,
-        behavioralRecommendation,
-      );
-
-      return {
-        componentName: component.name,
-        behavioralClassification,
-        recommendations,
-        conflicts,
-        familyPattern,
-        existingComponents,
-      };
-    }
-
-
-  // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-  // Internal helpers
-  // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-  /**
-   * Extract a markdown section by heading name.
-   *
-   * Returns the text between the heading and the next heading of equal or
-   * higher level, trimmed. Returns an empty string when the heading is not
-   * found.
-   */
-  private extractSection(content: string, heading: string): string {
-    // Match ## Heading (level 2) — Component-Family docs use level-2 headings
-    const escapedHeading = heading.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&');
-    const pattern = new RegExp(
-      `^(#{1,6})\\s+${escapedHeading}\\s*$`,
-      'm',
-    );
-    const match = pattern.exec(content);
-    if (!match) return '';
-
-    const level = match[1].length;
-    const startIdx = match.index + match[0].length;
-
-    // Find the next heading of equal or higher level
-    const rest = content.slice(startIdx);
-    const nextHeadingPattern = new RegExp(`^#{1,${level}}\\s+`, 'm');
-    const nextMatch = nextHeadingPattern.exec(rest);
-
-    const sectionText = nextMatch
-      ? rest.slice(0, nextMatch.index)
-      : rest;
-
-    return sectionText.trim();
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Extract behavioral contract names from the "Behavioral Contracts" section.
-   *
-   * Parses the markdown table under "Base Contracts" and extracts the
-   * contract names from the first column (backtick-wrapped identifiers).
-   * Falls back to extracting any backtick-wrapped identifiers if no table
-   * is found.
-   */
-  private extractBehavioralContracts(content: string): string[] {
-    const section = this.extractSection(content, 'Behavioral Contracts');
-    if (!section) return [];
-
-    const contracts: string[] = [];
-
-    // Strategy 1: Parse table rows — look for `contract_name` in first column
-    const tableRowPattern = /^\|[^|]*`([^`]+)`/gm;
-    let rowMatch: RegExpExecArray | null;
-    while ((rowMatch = tableRowPattern.exec(section)) !== null) {
-      const name = rowMatch[1].trim();
-      // Skip table header separators and generic words
-      if (name && !name.startsWith('-')) {
-        contracts.push(name);
-      }
-    }
-
-    if (contracts.length > 0) return contracts;
-
-    // Strategy 2: Fallback — extract #### headings (contract detail headings)
-    const headingPattern = /^####\s+(\w[\w_]*)/gm;
-    let headingMatch: RegExpExecArray | null;
-    while ((headingMatch = headingPattern.exec(section)) !== null) {
-      contracts.push(headingMatch[1]);
-    }
-
-    return contracts;
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Extract token usage patterns from the "Token Dependencies" section.
-   *
-   * Parses the markdown tables to extract token patterns (e.g.
-   * `color.action.primary`, `space.inset.*`).
-   */
-  private extractTokenUsagePatterns(content: string): string[] {
-    const section = this.extractSection(content, 'Token Dependencies');
-    if (!section) return [];
-
-    const patterns: string[] = [];
-
-    // Extract backtick-wrapped token references from table cells
-    const tokenPattern = /`([a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9.*]+(?:\.[a-zA-Z0-9.*]+)+)`/g;
-    let tokenMatch: RegExpExecArray | null;
-    while ((tokenMatch = tokenPattern.exec(section)) !== null) {
-      const token = tokenMatch[1];
-      if (!patterns.includes(token)) {
-        patterns.push(token);
-      }
-    }
-
-    return patterns;
-  }
-}