datacite-mapping 0.1.15 → 0.1.16

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1b886-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI"/>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>The Nature Conservancy San Diego Field Office</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Rare plant surveys</title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2015</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>TNC</subject>
+    <subject>The Nature Conservancy</subject>
+    <subject>plants</subject>
+    <subject>Calochortus weedii</subject>
+    <subject>weeds</subject>
+    <subject>Mariposa lily</subject>
+    <subject>rare plant surveys</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>McKinley;McKinley, Matthew J.</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+    <contributor contributorType="Funder">
+      <contributorName>The Nature Conservancy</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers>
+    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsSupplementedBy">http://www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/northamerica/unitedstates/california/contact/index.htm</relatedIdentifier>
+  </relatedIdentifiers>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">Dataset</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>615</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">For more detailed metadata, including data access and usage instructions, please download and consult README.txt file.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Methods">Document the distribution and abundance of rare plants; document reproduction of species in response to fire</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Other"/>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationBox>33.784409 -117.727003 33.792398 -117.682199</geoLocationBox>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1bc7v-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI"/>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>Baldassare, Mark</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Annual Survey of Orange County 1991</title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2014</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>Consumer Confidence</subject>
+    <subject>Social Issues</subject>
+    <subject>Transportation</subject>
+    <subject>Emissions</subject>
+    <subject>Recycling</subject>
+    <subject>Pollution</subject>
+    <subject>Politics</subject>
+    <subject>Growth</subject>
+    <subject>Traffic</subject>
+    <subject>Quality of Life</subject>
+    <subject>Senate Race</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>McKinley, Matthew J.</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+    <contributor contributorType="Funder">
+      <contributorName>University of California, Irvine</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers>
+    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsSupplementedBy">http://data.lib.uci.edu/ocs/</relatedIdentifier>
+  </relatedIdentifiers>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">Dataset</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>4026611</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">This 1991 survey examines ten years of trends in the Orange County Annual Survey. In asking questions from the 1982 benchmark survey, the focus is on the county's quality of life ratings and local public service ratings. The survey also examines changes over time in attitudes towards traffic congestion and growth, which have been the county's top two policy issues in the past decade. The sample size is 1,002 Orange County adult residents.
+
+Online data analysis &amp; additional documentation in Link below.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Methods">The Orange County Annual Survey was co-directed by Mark Baldassare, a UC Irvine professor of social ecology, and Cheryl Katz, research associate. For the survey, 1,002 adult Orange County residents were interviewed by telephone Sept. 3 to 20. 
+
+Interviewing was conducted on weekend days and weekday nights, using a computer-generated random sample of telephone numbers. 
+The field work was conducted at the Center for Survey Research at UCI. Of the telephone numbers called, 21 percent resulted in completed interviews and 14 percent were refusals. The completion rate for the survey was 60 percent, consistent with earlier Orange County Annual Surveys. 
+
+Within a household, respondents were chosen for interview using the Troldahl-Carter method. This method randomly selects a household member from a grid that includes information on the number of adult household members and the number of adult men in the household. Each interview included 93 questions and took an average of 20 minutes to complete.
+ 
+The interview began with questions about housing, consumer confidence, and general perceptions about Orange County. These were followed by questions on transportation, the quality of life, public service ratings, the environment, and air quality proposals. Later in the interview, we turned to the issues of health care and charity. The conclusion of the survey was devoted to questions about work, commuting, demographics, and politics. 
+
+For analysis, we statistically weighted the sample to represent the actual regional distribution of Orange County residents, as in previous surveys. The 1990 U.S. Census population figures by city were reviewed for this purpose. 
+
+The sampling error for this survey is +/-3 percent at the 95 percent confidence level. This means that 95 times out of 100, the results will be within 3 percentage points of what they would be if all adults in Orange County were interviewed. The sampling error for any subgroup would be larger. Sampling error is just one type of error to which surveys are subject. 
+Results may also be affected by question wording, survey timing and survey design.</description>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1c88h-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI"/>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>Laguna Canyon Foundation</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Wildlife Camera Project</title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2015</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>Laguna Coast Wilderness Park</subject>
+    <subject>wildlife corridor</subject>
+    <subject>animals</subject>
+    <subject>highway</subject>
+    <subject>toll road</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>McKinley;McKinley, Matthew J.</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+    <contributor contributorType="Funder">
+      <contributorName>OC Parks</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers>
+    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsSupplementedBy">http://www.ocparks.com/lagunacoast/</relatedIdentifier>
+  </relatedIdentifiers>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Collection">Collection</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>476</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">Monitor wildlife use of park corridors. For more detailed metadata, including data access and usage instructions, please download and consult README.txt file.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Other"/>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPoint>33.607999 -117.761071</geoLocationPoint>
+    </geoLocation>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPoint>33.613945 -117.760736</geoLocationPoint>
+    </geoLocation>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPoint>33.620763 -117.756304</geoLocationPoint>
+    </geoLocation>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPoint>33.595435 -117.760625</geoLocationPoint>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1cc75-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI"/>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>Baldassare, Mark</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Annual Survey of Orange County 1983</title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2014</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>Growth</subject>
+    <subject>Environmental Waste</subject>
+    <subject>Public School</subject>
+    <subject>Police</subject>
+    <subject>Health</subject>
+    <subject>Transportation</subject>
+    <subject>Schools</subject>
+    <subject>Parenting</subject>
+    <subject>Depression</subject>
+    <subject>Politics</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>McKinley, Matthew J.</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+    <contributor contributorType="Funder">
+      <contributorName>University of California, Irvine</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers>
+    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsSupplementedBy">http://data.lib.uci.edu/ocs/</relatedIdentifier>
+  </relatedIdentifiers>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">Dataset</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>3266843</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">The Orange County Annual Survey begins in 1982 to monitor the demographic, economic, and political character of Orange County and the changes in this character over time. Areas of primary concentration are housing, mobility, growth, transportation, public services, politics and government, and demographics. The survey of 1983 builds on its predecessor in each of these areas with a view toward the implications of current trends for the future of Orange County. The sample size is 1,003 Orange County adult residents.
+
+Online data analysis &amp; additional documentation in Link below.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Methods">The sample for the 1983 Orange County Survey consists of 1,003 randomly selected residents who were interviewed by telephone.  The sample is stratified geographically, with half of the sample selected from the north of the Santa Ana River and half from the south.  For data analyses, the sample is statistically weighted to represent the actual distribution of the Orange County population. 
+The sample in each area was chosen using a computer program, which randomly generates telephone numbers from among working blocks of telephone exchanges.  A working block is one that contains numbers in use.  The total of telephone numbers generated within an exchange was in proportion to the number of residential phones represented by that exchange in the northern part of the county or the southern part of the county.  Using this procedure, approximately 1,800 telephone numbers from the south and approximately 1,800 telephone numbers from the north were drawn.  This procedure of random digit dialing ensures that unlisted as well as listed numbers are included in the sample.  Also, since 95% of the households in Orange County have telephones, random dialing yields a sample representative of the population of Orange County.
+	The Troldahl-Carter Method was used in randomly selecting which adult member of the household was to be interviewed. This method consists of enumerating the total number of adults in the household and the total number of men in the household.  Then, using a prearranged grid, the interviewer selects the individual in the household for interviewing.
+	As further evidence of the representativeness of the sample chosen by the above methods, characteristics of the sample were compared to characteristics of the total Orange County population using the 1980 census.  On the basis of age, income, sex, marital status, household size, and home ownership, the sample is representative of the population of Orange County.  Characteristics of the 1982 Orange County Survey sample were also contrasted with the characteristics of the 1983 Orange County 
+Survey sample.  Marital status, ethnicity, age, sex, and education were closely comparable in the two surveys. 
+	The sampling error for this survey is plus or minus three percentage points.  This means that if this survey were to be repeated on hundred times, in 95 out of the 100 times the answers obtained for a particular question would match those we obtained in this survey within three points.  The sampling error for any particular sub-group would be greater.  These calculations assume that the data were collected under ideal circumstances.  Since there are a large number of practical problems in conducting social surveys, the actual sampling error for any particular result might be slightly larger.
+	As noted above, the interviewing for the Orange County Survey was done by telephone.  Cost considerations and methodological improvements have led to telephone surveys' increased adoption in the social sciences.  In addition, several studies show similar quality in telephone and face-to-face interviews. 
+	Interviewers were closely supervised during the data collection.  Interviewers participated in a two-hour training session on the Orange County Survey instrument.  Supervisors were available during the telephone interviewing to answer questions of interviewers or respondents.  The telephone system used also allowed supervisors to monitor interviews to correct for errors in administering the questionnaire.
+</description>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1d595-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI"/>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>OC Public Works</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Newport Bay Water Quality TMDL Annual Data Reports 2001 - 2013</title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2015</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>bacteria</subject>
+    <subject>feces</subject>
+    <subject>rod</subject>
+    <subject>lactic acid</subject>
+    <subject>phylum firmicutes</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>McKinley;McKinley, Matthew J.</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+    <contributor contributorType="Funder">
+      <contributorName>The County of Orange</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers>
+    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsSupplementedBy">http://ocwatersheds.com/rainrecords/waterqualitydata/water_quality_monitoring_data</relatedIdentifier>
+  </relatedIdentifiers>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Text</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>80428046</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">Summary of bacteriological data collected in Newport Bay from April 1 through March 31 of each year. For more detailed metadata, including data access and usage instructions, please download and consult README.txt file.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Other"/>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPoint>33.616667 -117.8975</geoLocationPoint>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1f30c-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI"/>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>AECOM</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>Aerial Information System, Inc.</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>California Native Plant Society</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Vegetation Classification for the Nature Reserve of Orange County </title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2016</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>plant community</subject>
+    <subject>vegetation classification</subject>
+    <subject>vegetation monitoring</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>McKinley;McKinley, Matthew J.</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+    <contributor contributorType="Funder">
+      <contributorName>California Department of Fish and Wildlife</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers/>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">Dataset</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>21073226</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">The ultimate goal of this project is to create an updated fine‐scale vegetation map for about 58,000 acres of
+Orange County, consisting of the 37,000‐acre Orange County Central and Coastal Subregions Natural Community
+Conservation Plan (NCCP)/Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) Habitat Reserve System; approximately 9,500 acres of
+associated NCCP/HCP Special Linkages, Existing Use Areas, and Non‐Reserve Open Space; and approximately
+11,000 acres of adjoining conserved open space (study area). The project consisted of three phases.
+
+Phase 1:
+To update vegetation mapping, the Natural Reserve
+of Orange County (NROC) proposes to use Manual of California Vegetation (MCV) methods (2009), which will be
+implemented in two stages:
+Stage 1 – Development of a vegetation classification system for the Central and Coastal Subregions of
+Orange County that is consistent with the MCV.
+Stage 2 – Application of the vegetation classification system to create a vegetation map through photointerpretation
+of available aerial imagery and ground reconnaissance.
+The MCV methods were developed by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Vegetation
+Classification and Mapping Program in collaboration with the California Native Plant Society (CNPS). This approach
+relies on the collection of quantifiable environmental data to identify and classify biological associations that
+repeat across the landscape. For areas where documentation is lacking to effectively define all of the vegetation
+patterns found in California, CDFG and CNPS developed the Vegetation Rapid Assessment Protocol. This protocol
+guides data collection and analysis to refine vegetation classifications that are consistent with CDFG and MCV
+standards. Based on an earlier classification by Gray and Bramlet (1992), Orange County is expected to have
+vegetation types not yet described in the MCV. Using the MCV approach, Rapid Assessment (RA) data was
+collected throughout the study area and analyzed to characterize these new vegetation types or show concurrence
+with existing MCV types.
+
+Phase 2:
+Aerial Information Systems, Inc. (AIS) was contracted by the Nature Reserve of Orange County (NROC) to create an updated fine-scale regional vegetation map consistent with the California Department of Fish &amp; Wildlife (CDFW) classification methodology and mapping standards. The mapping area covers approximately 86,000 acres of open space and adjacent urban and agricultural lands including habitat located in both the Central and Coastal Subregions of Orange County. The map was prepared over a baseline digital image created in 2012 by the US Department of Agriculture – Farm Service Agency’s National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP). Vegetation units were mapped using the National Vegetation Classification System (NVCS) to the Alliance level as depicted in the second edition of the Manual of California Vegetation (MCV2). 
+One of the most important data layers used to guide the conservation planning process for the 1996 Orange County Central &amp; Coastal Subregion Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) was the regional vegetation map created in the early 1990s by Dave Bramlett &amp; Jones &amp; Stokes Associates, Inc. (Jones &amp; Stokes Associates, Inc. 1993). Up until now, this same map continues to be used to direct monitoring and management efforts in the NCCP/HCP Habitat Reserve. 
+An updated map is necessary in order to address changes in vegetation makeup due to widespread and multiple burns in the mapping area, urban expansion, and broadly occurring vegetation succession that has occurred over the past 20 years since the original map was created. This update is further necessary in order to conform to the current NVCS, which is supported by the extensive acquisition of ground based field data and subsequent analysis that has ensued in those same 20 years over the region and adjacent similar habitats in the coastal and mountain foothills of Southern California. 
+Vegetative and cartographic comparisons between the newly created 2012 image-based map and the original 1990s era vegetation map are documented in a separate report produced by the California Native Plant Society at the end of 2014.
+
+Phase 3:
+The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Vegetation Program conducted an independent
+accuracy assessment of a new vegetation map completed for the natural lands of Orange
+County in collaboration with Aerial Information Systems (AIS), the California Department of Fish
+and Wildlife (CDFW), and the Nature Reserve of Orange County (NROC). This report provides
+a summary of the accuracy assessment allocation, field sampling methods, and analysis results;
+it also provides an in-depth crosswalk and comparison between the new map and the existing
+1992 vegetation map. California state standards (CDFW 2007) require that a vegetation map
+should achieve an overall accuracy of 80%. After final scoring, the new Orange County
+vegetation map received an overall user’s accuracy of 87%. The new fine-scale vegetation map
+and supporting field survey data provide baseline information for long-term land management
+and conservation within the remaining natural lands of Orange County.
+
+Data made available in the OC Data Portal in partnership with UCI Libraries.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Methods">The project consisted of three phases, each with its own methodology.
+
+Phase 1:
+To update vegetation mapping, the Natural Reserve
+of Orange County (NROC) usedManual of California Vegetation (MCV) methods (2009), which will be implemented in two stages:
+Stage 1 – Development of a vegetation classification system for the Central and Coastal Subregions of
+Orange County that is consistent with the MCV.
+Stage 2 – Application of the vegetation classification system to create a vegetation map through photointerpretation of available aerial imagery and ground reconnaissance.
+
+Phase 2:
+Aerial Information Systems, Inc. (AIS) was contracted by the Nature Reserve of Orange County (NROC) to create an updated fine-scale regional vegetation map consistent with the California Department of Fish &amp; Wildlife (CDFW) classification methodology and mapping standards.
+
+Phase 3:
+The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Vegetation Program conducted an independent
+accuracy assessment of a new vegetation map completed for the natural lands of Orange
+County in collaboration with Aerial Information Systems (AIS), the California Department of Fish
+and Wildlife (CDFW), and the Nature Reserve of Orange County (NROC).
+
+For more detailed methodology information please consult the README.txt file included with dataset.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Other">Local Assistance Grant #P1082023</description>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationBox>33.643 -117.981 33.85 -117.555</geoLocationBox>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1f59g-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI"/>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>Baldassare, Mark</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Annual Survey of Orange County 1998</title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2014</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>Consumer Confidence</subject>
+    <subject>Economy</subject>
+    <subject>Taxes</subject>
+    <subject>El Toro Airport</subject>
+    <subject>Air Travel</subject>
+    <subject>Social Issues</subject>
+    <subject>School Bonds</subject>
+    <subject>School Vouchers</subject>
+    <subject>Transportation</subject>
+    <subject>Measure M</subject>
+    <subject>Traffic</subject>
+    <subject>Growth</subject>
+    <subject>Pollution</subject>
+    <subject>Business</subject>
+    <subject>Demography</subject>
+    <subject>Politics</subject>
+    <subject>Urbanization</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>McKinley, Matthew J.</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+    <contributor contributorType="Funder">
+      <contributorName>University of California, Irvine</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers>
+    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsSupplementedBy">http://data.lib.uci.edu/ocs/</relatedIdentifier>
+  </relatedIdentifiers>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">Dataset</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>717189</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">This seventeenth Orange County Annual Survey continues to track trends over time in the county's important social, economic and political issues. This year, there is a special focus on understanding the impacts of incresing urbanization and the changing demographics of Orange County. The sample size is 1,000 Orange County adult residents. 
+
+Online data analysis &amp; additional documentation in Link below.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Methods">The 1998 Orange County Annual Survey was co-directed by Mark Baldassare, professor at UCI and senior fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California, and Cheryl Katz, research associate. The random telephone survey included interviews with 2,002 Orange County adult residents conducted Sept. 1-13, 1998. We follow the methods used in the 16 previous surveys, with two exceptions. This year, we doubled the sample size of the Orange County Annual Survey, which is usually about 1,000 interviews, so that we could expand our analysis of the Latino and Asian populations. We also conducted interviews in Vietnamese as well as in English and Spanish. 
+
+Interviewing was conducted on weekend days and weekday nights, using a computer-generated random sample of telephone numbers. Within a household, adult respondents were randomly chosen for interview. Each interview took an average of 20 minutes to complete. The interviewing was conducted in English, Spanish or Vietnamese, as needed. The completion rate was 74 percent. The telephone interviewing was conducted by Interviewing Services of America in Van Nuys, CA. 
+
+The survey sample was compared with the U.S. Census and state figures by city for Orange County, and was found to represent the actual regional distribution of Orange County residents. The sample's demographic characteristics also were closely comparable to the census and other survey data, including previous Orange County Annual Surveys. 
+
+The sampling error for this survey is +/- 2% at the 95% confidence level. This means that 95 times out of 100, the results will be within two percentage points of what they would be if all adults in Orange 
+County were interviewed. The sampling error for any subgroup would be larger. Sampling error is just one type of error to which surveys are subject. Results may also be affected by question wording, ordering, and survey timing. 
+
+Throughout the report, we refer to two geographic regions. North County includes Anaheim, Orange, Villa Park, La Habra, Brea, Buena Park, Fullerton, Placentia, Yorba Linda, La Palma, Cypress, Los Alamitos, Rossmoor, Seal Beach, Westminster, Midway City, Stanton, Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach, Santa Ana, Garden Grove, Tustin, Tustin Foothills and Costa Mesa. South County includes Newport Beach, Irvine, Lake Forest, Aliso Viejo, Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Mission Viejo, Portola Hills, Rancho Santa Margarita, 
+Foothill Ranch, Coto de Caza, Trabuco Highlands, El Toro Station, Laguna Beach, Dana Point, San Clemente, Capistrano Beach and San Juan Capistrano. In the analysis of questions on the proposed El Toro airport, we include Newport Beach in North County.</description>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>