datacite-mapping 0.1.15 → 0.1.16

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1qp47-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI"/>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>Baldassare, Mark</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Annual Survey of Orange County 1988</title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2014</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>Consumer Confidence</subject>
+    <subject>Growth</subject>
+    <subject>Freeways</subject>
+    <subject>Taxes</subject>
+    <subject>Schools</subject>
+    <subject>Charitable Giving</subject>
+    <subject>Funding</subject>
+    <subject>School Bonds</subject>
+    <subject>Politics</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>McKinley, Matthew J.</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers>
+    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsSupplementedBy">http://data.lib.uci.edu/ocs/</relatedIdentifier>
+  </relatedIdentifiers>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">Dataset</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>3466080</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">The theme of the survey is &quot;Orange County: A Change of Course.&quot; The 1988 Orange County Annual Survey examines previous trends and explore new topics. The survey is designed to provide a comprehensive analysis of county issues. The sample size is 1,003 Orange County adult residents.
+
+Online data analysis &amp; additional documentation in Link below.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Methods">The Orange county Annual Survey was directed by Mark Baldassare, a professor of social ecology at UC Irvine. For the survey, 1,003 adult Orange County residents were interviewed by telephone Sept. 6 to 22. In Orange County, where more than 97 percent of households have telephones, this method of interview gives highly representative data.
+
+Interviewing was conducted on weekend days and weekdaynights, using a random sample of 4,500 listed and unlisted telephone numbers. These telephone numbers were generated by computer from a list of working blocks of telephone exchanges. The telephone sample was generated by Pijacki and Associates of Shoreham, N.Y. The field work was conducted at the Center for Survey Research by UCI's Public Policy Research Organization.
+
+Of the telephone numbers called, 22 percent resulted in completed interviews and 13 percent were refusals. The completion rate for the survey (completions divided by completions plus refusals) was 62 percent.
+
+Other telephone outcomes included the following: 21 percent disconnected numbers; 15 percent businesses and government agencies; 7 percent persistent no answer; 2 percent persistent telephone answering machines; 2 percent computer lines; and 2 percent persistently unavailable respondents. Three percent were not completed because of language problems, including Spanish and other non-English speaking households, and hearing impairment.
+
+Within a household, respondents were chosen for interview using the Troldahl-Carter method. This method randomly selects a household member from a grid that includes information on the number of adult household members and the number of adult men in the household.
+
+Each interview contained 90 questions and took an average of 17 minutes to complete. Length of interview ranged from a low of 10 minutes to a high of 30 minutes.
+
+The surveys were designed in three stages over several months. In the first stage, UCI undergraduate students conducted face-to-face interviews on Orange county topics with randomly selected adult residents. The second stage involved feedback on questions and topics from the annual survey's steering Committee, Advisory committee and colleagues. The final stage included pre-tests, followed by final revisions of the questions.
+
+The interview began with questions about housing, consumer confidence and perceptions of life in Orange County. These were followed by questions on growth, traffic and transportation issues. Later in the interview, we turned to the topics of charities, public education and child care. The conclusion of the survey was devoted to questions about work and commuting patterns, personal characteristics, household status and political views.The survey's validity was checked by comparing the sample's characteristics to available information on Orange County's population. We compared the 1987 survey results to the 1980 U. S. Census, previous annual surveys and other recent survey data. Age, income and other demographic features of our sample were comparable with those noted in other studies.For data analyses, we statistically weighted the sample to represent the actual regional distribution of Orange County residents.
+
+Other efforts were made to correct for possible errors in the process of interviewing and data processing. Approximately 10 percent of the completed interviews were verified through callbacks. All questionnaires were checked by the interviewer supervisor immediately after completion. Finally, keypunched data were double-checked for all cases in the survey sample.The sampling error for this survey is +/-3 percent at the 95 percent confidence level. This means that 95 times out of 100, the results will be within 3 percentage pointsof what they would be if all adults in Orange county were interviewed. The sampling error for any subgroup would be larger.
+
+Sampling error is just one type of error to which surveys are subject. Results may also influenced by factors such as question wording, survey timing and other aspects of survey design.</description>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1rg67-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI"/>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>Pataki, Diane</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Physiology of Urban Trees, 6 of 7</title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2015</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>urban ecology</subject>
+    <subject>SLA</subject>
+    <subject>Specific leaf area</subject>
+    <subject>carbon isotope analysis</subject>
+    <subject>California sycamore</subject>
+    <subject>coast live oak</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>McKinley;McKinley, Matthew J.</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers>
+    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsSupplementedBy">http://bioweb.biology.utah.edu/pataki/</relatedIdentifier>
+  </relatedIdentifiers>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">Dataset</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>561</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">Measurements of water use by trees planted in urban environments. For more detailed metadata, including data access and usage instructions, please download and consult README.txt file.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Other"/>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPoint>33.62 -117.56</geoLocationPoint>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1rp4j-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI"/>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>Baldassare, Mark</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Special Survey of Orange County 2003</title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2014</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>Consumer Confidence</subject>
+    <subject>Government</subject>
+    <subject>Traffic</subject>
+    <subject>Growth</subject>
+    <subject>Recession</subject>
+    <subject>Quality of Life</subject>
+    <subject>Transportation</subject>
+    <subject>Business</subject>
+    <subject>Arnold Schwarzenegger</subject>
+    <subject>Budget</subject>
+    <subject>George W. Bush</subject>
+    <subject>Health</subject>
+    <subject>Vote</subject>
+    <subject>Politics</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>McKinley, Matthew J.</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+    <contributor contributorType="Funder">
+      <contributorName>University of California, Irvine</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers>
+    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsSupplementedBy">http://data.lib.uci.edu/ocs/</relatedIdentifier>
+  </relatedIdentifiers>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">Dataset</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>631014</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">This survey of 1,004 adult residents includes questions from earlier Orange County Annual Surveys. It also includes key indicators from the PPIC Statewide Survey for comparisons with the state and regions of California. The study also considers racial/ethnic, income, and political differences. The following issues are explored in this Orange County Survey: Orange County issues, state issues and national issues. Orange County Issues include such questions as: What are the trends over time in ratings of life in Orange County? How satisfied are residents with their finances, local public services, local government, the economy, and with the quality of life in Orange County? Compared to other regions of the state, how much of a problem are issues such as traffic congestion, the economy, growth, and housing in Orange County? What are residents preferences for transportation plans and local transportation taxes?
+
+Online data analysis &amp; additional documentation in Link below.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Methods">The Orange County Survey - a collaborative effort of the Public Policy Institute of California and the School of Social Ecology at the University of California, Irvine - is a special edition of the PPIC Statewide Survey. This is the third in an annual series of PPIC surveys of Orange County.  Mark Baldassare, the director of the PPIC Statewide Survey, is the founder and director of the Orange County Annual Survey at UCI and a former UCI professor.  The UCI survey was conducted 19 times from 1982 to 2000, so the Orange County Survey collaboration between PPIC and UCI that began in 2001 is an extension of earlier survey efforts. The special survey of Orange County is co-sponsored by UCI with local support from Deloitte and Touche, Pacific Life Foundation, Disneyland, Los Angeles Times, Orange County Business Council, Orange County Division of League of California Cities, Orange County Register, The Irvine Company, and United Way of Orange County. Orange County is the second most populous county in the state and one of California's fastest growing and changing regions. The county is home to almost three million residents today, having gained approximately one million residents since 1980. Three in four residents were white and non-Hispanic in 1980; today, nearly half are Latinos and Asians. The county's dynamic economy has become one of the leaders in the high-technology industry.  The county is a bellwether county in politics and the site of many important governance issues, including a county-government bankruptcy, public controversy over the reuse plans for the closed El Toro Marine Corps Air Station, and the use and expansion of toll roads. There are also housing, transportation, and environmental concerns related to development. Public opinion findings are critical to informing discussions and resolving public debates on key issues.  The purpose of this study is to inform policymakers by providing timely, accurate, and objective information about policy preferences and economic, social, and political trends.  
+
+To measure changes over time, this survey of 1,004 adult residents includes questions from earlier Orange County Annual Surveys.  It also includes key indicators from the PPIC Statewide Survey for comparisons with the state and regions of California.  We also consider racial/ethnic, income, and political differences. The following issues are explored in this Orange County Survey:  
+
+Orange County Issues - What are the trends over time in ratings of life in Orange County?  How satisfied are residents 
+with their finances, local public services, local government, the economy, and with the quality of life in Orange County?  
+Compared to other regions of the state, how much of a problem are issues such as traffic congestion, the economy, growth, and 
+housing in Orange County?  What are residents' preferences for transportation plans and local transportation taxes?  
+State Issues - What is the overall outlook for the state and the California economy?  How much confidence do residents have in state government, and how do they want to see the state's budget issues resolved?  How do residents rate the current plans and policies of Governor Schwarzenegger, and what do they see as the top policy priorities for the new administration in Sacramento?   
+
+National Issues - What is the outlook for the United States and the national economy?  How do residents rate the overall performance of President Bush and his handling of the economy and terrorism?  Which party do they trust when it comes 
+to handling issues such as the economy, health care, and national security?  What are their early preferences in the 2004 
+national elections?</description>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1sg6j-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.7280/D1SG6J</identifier>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>Kimball, Sarah</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>Lulow, Megan E.</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>Sorenson, Quinn M.</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Establishment and Management of Native Functional Groups in Restoration</title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2015</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>coastal sage scrub</subject>
+    <subject>community assembly</subject>
+    <subject>competition</subject>
+    <subject>functional traits</subject>
+    <subject>invasive species</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>Kimball, Sarah</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers>
+    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="Documents">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rec.12022/abstract</relatedIdentifier>
+  </relatedIdentifiers>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">Dataset</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>118955</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">The limiting similarity hypothesis predicts that communities
+should be more resistant to invasion by non-natives
+when they include natives with a diversity of traits from
+more than one functional group. In restoration, planting
+natives with a diversity of traits may result in competition
+between natives of different functional groups and
+may influence the efficacy of different seeding and maintenance
+methods, potentially impacting native establishment.
+We compare initial establishment and first-year performance
+of natives and the effectiveness of maintenance
+techniques in uniform versus mixed functional group plantings.
+We seeded ruderal herbaceous natives, longer-lived
+shrubby natives, or a mixture of the two functional groups
+using drill- and hand-seeding methods. Non-natives were
+left undisturbed, removed by hand-weeding and mowing,
+or treated with herbicide to test maintenance methods
+in a factorial design. Native functional groups had highest
+establishment, growth, and reproduction when planted
+alone, and hand-seeding resulted in more natives as well
+as more of the most common invasive, Brassica nigra.
+Wick herbicide removed more non-natives and resulted in
+greater reproduction of natives, while hand-weeding and
+mowing increased native density. Our results point to the
+importance of considering competition among native functional
+groups as well as between natives and invasives in
+restoration. Interactions among functional groups, seeding
+methods, and maintenance techniques indicate restoration
+will be easier to implement when natives with different
+traits are planted separately.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Methods">Using different seeding methods (drill vs. hand seeding)
+and maintenance methods (hand weeding and mowing
+vs. herbicide) we tested initial establishment, growth, and reproduction of natives from seed mixes that contained
+ruderals, shrubs, or a combination of the two.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Other"/>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPoint>33.7647 -117.7382</geoLocationPoint>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1t88j-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI"/>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>Crystal Cove Alliance</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Crystal Cove Marine Conservation Area Citizen Science Monitoring</title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2015</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>fish</subject>
+    <subject>water quality</subject>
+    <subject>plankton</subject>
+    <subject>Marine Protected Area</subject>
+    <subject>Crystal Cove State Park</subject>
+    <subject>monitoring</subject>
+    <subject>citizen science</subject>
+    <subject>near shore</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>McKinley;McKinley, Matthew J.</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers>
+    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsSupplementedBy">http://www.crystalcovealliance.org/</relatedIdentifier>
+  </relatedIdentifiers>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">Dataset</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>45558</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">Crystal Cove Alliance operates the Crystal Cove Marine Protected Area Citizen Science Cruise in partnership with Newport Landing Sportfishing.  Under the supervision of trained Crystal Cove Alliance staff, junior high school and high school students collect data on fish and plankton biodiversity and nearshore water quality in the Crystal Cove Marine Conservation Area, following protocols designed in partnership with UCI and other researchers. Data made available in the OC Data Portal in partnership with UCI Libraries. See README file for more detailed information.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Methods">Contact Crystal Cove Alliance for detailed protocols.
+Fish biodiversity: Used an underwater camera to perform a vertical transect within the kelp forest or rocky reef to look for presence or absence of 6 key fish species. Videos available upon request
+Plankton biodiversity: Used 3 plankton nets to perform a surface horizontal tow and identified presence or absence of 9 key species using a microscope. 
+Water Quality: Used Van Dorn bottles to collect water from the surface to 16 meters in two meter intervals. Tested for temperature, salinity and pH.</description>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationBox>33.55402 -117.877293 33.589527 -117.820001</geoLocationBox>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1tg6v-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI"/>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>Baldassare, Mark</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Annual Survey of Orange County 1995</title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2014</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>Consumer Confidence</subject>
+    <subject>Economy</subject>
+    <subject>Social Issues</subject>
+    <subject>Crime</subject>
+    <subject>Transportation</subject>
+    <subject>Charitable Giving</subject>
+    <subject>Bill Clinton</subject>
+    <subject>Bob Dole</subject>
+    <subject>Pete Wilson</subject>
+    <subject>Politics</subject>
+    <subject>County Bankruptcy</subject>
+    <subject>Quality of Life</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>McKinley, Matthew J.</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+    <contributor contributorType="Funder">
+      <contributorName>University of California, Irvine</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers>
+    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsSupplementedBy">http://data.lib.uci.edu/ocs/</relatedIdentifier>
+  </relatedIdentifiers>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">Dataset</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>404721</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">This fourteenth Orange County Annual Survey, UCI, spotlights several top concerns of Orange County residents. This year's survey focuses on the Orange County financial crisis that began last December when the county government declared bankruptcy. It seeks to determine how the financial crisis has affected attitudes about the local economy and quality of life. The sample size is 1,001 Orange County adult residents.
+
+Online data analysis &amp; additional documentation in Link below.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Methods">The Orange County Annual Survey, UCI, was co-directed by Mark Baldassare, professor and chair of urban and regional planning, and Cheryl Katz, research associate. The random telephone survey included interviews with 1,001 Orange County adult residents conducted August 18 to 27, 1995. 
+
+We follow the methodology used in the 13 previous surveys. 
+
+Interviewing was conducted on weekend days and weekday nights, using a computer-generated random sample of telephone numbers. Within a household, adult respondents were randomly chosen for interview. Each interview included 94 questions and took an average of 20 minutes to complete. The interviewing was conducted in English and Spanish, as needed. 
+
+The completion rate for the survey was 74 percent. This rate is consistent with earlier Orange County Annual Surveys. Of the telephone numbers called, 20 percent resulted in completed interviews and 7 percent were refusals. The field work was conducted by Interviewing Services of America in Van Nuys, CA. 
+
+The sample was compared to the U.S. Census and state figures by city for Orange County, and was found to represent the actual regional distribution of Orange County residents. The sample's demographic characteristics were also closely comparable to the Census and other survey data for Orange County residents. 
+
+The sampling error for this survey is +/- 3 percent at the 95 percent confidence level. This means that 95 times out of 100, the results will be within 3 percentage points of what they would be if all adults in Orange County were interviewed. The sampling error for any subgroup would be larger. Sampling error is just one type of error to which surveys are subject. Results may also be affected by question wording, ordering, and survey timing.</description>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>

data/spec/data/dash1-datacite-xml/uci-ark+=b7280=d1v88v-mrt-datacite.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><resource xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd">
+  <identifier identifierType="DOI"/>
+  <creators>
+    <creator>
+      <creatorName>The Nature Conservancy San Diego Field Office</creatorName>
+    </creator>
+  </creators>
+  <titles>
+    <title>Reptile and amphibian surveys</title>
+  </titles>
+  <publisher>UC Irvine</publisher>
+  <publicationYear>2015</publicationYear>
+  <subjects>
+    <subject>TNC</subject>
+    <subject>The Nature Conservancy</subject>
+    <subject>reptiles</subject>
+    <subject>amphibians</subject>
+    <subject>snakes</subject>
+    <subject>lizards</subject>
+    <subject>frogs</subject>
+  </subjects>
+  <contributors>
+    <contributor contributorType="DataManager">
+      <contributorName>McKinley;McKinley, Matthew J.</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+    <contributor contributorType="Funder">
+      <contributorName>The Nature Conservancy</contributorName>
+    </contributor>
+  </contributors>
+  <relatedIdentifiers>
+    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsSupplementedBy">http://www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/northamerica/unitedstates/california/contact/index.htm</relatedIdentifier>
+  </relatedIdentifiers>
+  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset">Dataset</resourceType>
+  <sizes>
+    <size>593</size>
+  </sizes>
+  <rightsList>
+    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)</rights>
+  </rightsList>
+  <descriptions>
+    <description descriptionType="Abstract">For more detailed metadata, including data access and usage instructions, please download and consult README.txt file.</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Methods">Characterize the herpetological species richness and biodiversity; define habitat associations for species</description>
+    <description descriptionType="Other"/>
+  </descriptions>
+  <geoLocations>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationPlace>Orange County (Calif.)</geoLocationPlace>
+    </geoLocation>
+    <geoLocation>
+      <geoLocationBox>33.777275 -117.715845 33.784979 -117.686834</geoLocationBox>
+    </geoLocation>
+  </geoLocations>
+</resource>