moai-adk 0.34.0__py3-none-any.whl → 1.1.0__py3-none-any.whl

moai_adk/templates/.claude/skills/moai-workflow-testing/modules/automated-code-review/review-workflows.md

@@ -0,0 +1,500 @@
+# Code Review Workflows and CI/CD Integration
+
+> Module: Automated review workflows for CI/CD pipelines and team collaboration
+> Parent: [Automated Code Review](../automated-code-review.md)
+> Complexity: Intermediate
+> Time: 20+ minutes
+> Dependencies: Python 3.8+, git, CI/CD platforms
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+### CI/CD Integration Platforms
+
+GitHub Actions:
+- Automated reviews on pull requests
+- Status checks for quality gates
+- Comment generation with findings
+- Matrix builds for multiple Python versions
+
+GitLab CI/CD:
+- Pipeline integration with code quality stages
+- Merge request automation
+- Quality gate enforcement
+- Code quality reports
+
+Jenkins:
+- Pipeline as code integration
+- Build failure on quality gate violations
+- Trend analysis and reporting
+- Multi-branch pipeline support
+
+### Core Workflow Pattern
+
+```python
+async def automated_review_workflow(
+    project_path: str,
+    pr_number: int = None,
+    fail_on_quality_gate: bool = True
+) -> CodeReviewReport:
+    """Execute automated code review workflow."""
+
+    # Initialize reviewer
+    reviewer = AutomatedCodeReviewer(context7_client=context7)
+
+    # Run review
+    report = await reviewer.review_codebase(
+        project_path=project_path,
+        include_patterns=["/*.py"],
+        exclude_patterns=["/tests/", "/migrations/"]
+    )
+
+    # Check quality gates
+    quality_gate_passed = check_quality_gates(report)
+
+    if fail_on_quality_gate and not quality_gate_passed:
+        raise QualityGateError("Code review quality gates failed")
+
+    # Generate report
+    generate_review_report(report, pr_number)
+
+    return report
+```
+
+---
+
+## Quality Gates
+
+### Quality Gate Configuration
+
+```python
+class QualityGateConfig:
+    """Quality gate configuration."""
+
+    def __init__(self):
+        self.gates = {
+            'overall_trust_score': 0.70,      # Minimum overall score
+            'truthfulness_score': 0.75,       # Minimum truthfulness
+            'safety_score': 0.80,             # Minimum safety
+            'critical_issues': 0,              # No critical issues allowed
+            'high_issues': 5,                  # Maximum high severity issues
+            'medium_issues': 20,               # Maximum medium issues
+            'new_critical_issues': 0,          # No new critical issues
+            'coverage_percentage': 80.0        # Minimum test coverage
+        }
+
+def check_quality_gates(report: CodeReviewReport, config: QualityGateConfig) -> bool:
+    """Check if code review passes quality gates."""
+
+    gates_passed = True
+    failures = []
+
+    # Check overall TRUST score
+    if report.overall_trust_score < config.gates['overall_trust_score']:
+        gates_passed = False
+        failures.append(
+            f"Overall TRUST score {report.overall_trust_score:.2f} "
+            f"below threshold {config.gates['overall_trust_score']}"
+        )
+
+    # Check safety score
+    safety_score = report.overall_category_scores.get(TrustCategory.SAFETY, 0.0)
+    if safety_score < config.gates['safety_score']:
+        gates_passed = False
+        failures.append(
+            f"Safety score {safety_score:.2f} "
+            f"below threshold {config.gates['safety_score']}"
+        )
+
+    # Check critical issues
+    critical_count = len(report.critical_issues)
+    if critical_count > config.gates['critical_issues']:
+        gates_passed = False
+        failures.append(
+            f"Found {critical_count} critical issues "
+            f"(max: {config.gates['critical_issues']})"
+        )
+
+    # Check high severity issues
+    high_count = report.summary_metrics['issues_by_severity'].get('high', 0)
+    if high_count > config.gates['high_issues']:
+        gates_passed = False
+        failures.append(
+            f"Found {high_count} high severity issues "
+            f"(max: {config.gates['high_issues']})"
+        )
+
+    return gates_passed, failures
+```
+
+---
+
+## GitHub Actions Integration
+
+### Workflow Configuration
+
+```yaml
+# .github/workflows/code-review.yml
+name: Automated Code Review
+
+on:
+  pull_request:
+    branches: [main, develop]
+  push:
+    branches: [main, develop]
+
+jobs:
+  code-review:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    strategy:
+      matrix:
+        python-version: [3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11]
+
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
+        with:
+          fetch-depth: 0  # Full history for better analysis
+
+      - name: Set up Python
+        uses: actions/setup-python@v4
+        with:
+          python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }}
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: |
+          python -m pip install --upgrade pip
+          pip install pylint flake8 bandit mypy
+          pip install moai-adk
+
+      - name: Run automated code review
+        run: |
+          python -m moai_adk.code_review \
+            --path . \
+            --output review-report.json \
+            --format json \
+            --fail-on-gate
+
+      - name: Upload review report
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
+        with:
+          name: code-review-report-${{ matrix.python-version }}
+          path: review-report.json
+
+      - name: Comment PR with results
+        if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
+        uses: actions/github-script@v6
+        with:
+          script: |
+            const fs = require('fs');
+            const report = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('review-report.json', 'utf8'));
+
+            const comment = `## Code Review Results
+            **Overall TRUST Score:** ${report.overall_trust_score.toFixed(2)}
+
+            ### Category Scores
+            ${Object.entries(report.overall_category_scores).map(([cat, score]) =>
+              `- **${cat}:** ${score.toFixed(2)}`
+            ).join('\n')}
+
+            ### Issues Summary
+            - **Critical:** ${report.summary_metrics.critical_issues}
+            - **High:** ${report.summary_metrics.issues_by_severity.high}
+            - **Medium:** ${report.summary_metrics.issues_by_severity.medium}
+            - **Low:** ${report.summary_metrics.issues_by_severity.low}
+
+            ${report.critical_issues.length > 0 ? `
+            ### Critical Issues
+            ${report.critical_issues.map(issue =>
+              `- **${issue.title}** in \`${issue.file_path}:${issue.line_number}\`
+                ${issue.description}`
+            ).join('\n')}
+            ` : ''}
+            `;
+
+            github.rest.issues.createComment({
+              issue_number: context.issue.number,
+              owner: context.repo.owner,
+              repo: context.repo.repo,
+              body: comment
+            });
+```
+
+---
+
+## GitLab CI/CD Integration
+
+### Pipeline Configuration
+
+```yaml
+# .gitlab-ci.yml
+stages:
+  - test
+  - review
+  - report
+
+code_review:
+  stage: review
+  image: python:3.10
+  script:
+    - pip install pylint flake8 bandit mypy moai-adk
+    - python -m moai_adk.code_review --path . --output review-report.json --format json
+  artifacts:
+    paths:
+      - review-report.json
+    reports:
+      codequality: review-report.json
+    expire_in: 1 week
+  only:
+    - merge_requests
+    - main
+    - develop
+
+quality_gate:
+  stage: report
+  image: python:3.10
+  script:
+    - pip install moai-adk
+    - python -m moai_adk.quality_gate --report review-report.json --fail-on-violation
+  dependencies:
+    - code_review
+  allow_failure: false
+  only:
+    - merge_requests
+```
+
+---
+
+## Report Generation
+
+### Markdown Report
+
+```python
+def generate_markdown_report(report: CodeReviewReport) -> str:
+    """Generate comprehensive Markdown report."""
+
+    md = f"""# Code Review Report
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+**Overall TRUST Score:** {report.overall_trust_score:.2f}
+**Files Reviewed:** {report.summary_metrics['files_reviewed']}
+**Total Issues:** {report.summary_metrics['total_issues']}
+**Critical Issues:** {report.summary_metrics['critical_issues']}
+
+## TRUST 5 Category Scores
+
+"""
+
+    for category, score in report.overall_category_scores.items():
+        md += f"- **{category.value.title()}:** {score:.2f}\n"
+
+    md += "\n## Issues by Severity\n\n"
+
+    for severity in ['critical', 'high', 'medium', 'low']:
+        count = report.summary_metrics['issues_by_severity'].get(severity, 0)
+        md += f"- **{severity.title()}:** {count}\n"
+
+    if report.critical_issues:
+        md += "\n## Critical Issues\n\n"
+        for issue in report.critical_issues[:10]:
+            md += f"### {issue.title}\n"
+            md += f"- **Location:** `{issue.file_path}:{issue.line_number}`\n"
+            md += f"- **Description:** {issue.description}\n"
+            md += f"- **Suggested Fix:** {issue.suggested_fix}\n"
+            md += f"- **Rule:** {issue.rule_violated}\n\n"
+
+    md += "\n## Recommendations\n\n"
+    for i, rec in enumerate(report.recommendations[:5], 1):
+        md += f"{i}. {rec}\n"
+
+    return md
+```
+
+### HTML Report
+
+```python
+def generate_html_report(report: CodeReviewReport) -> str:
+    """Generate HTML report with interactive elements."""
+
+    html = f"""
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+    <title>Code Review Report</title>
+    <style>
+        body {{ font-family: Arial, sans-serif; margin: 20px; }}
+        .score-circle {{
+            width: 150px;
+            height: 150px;
+            border-radius: 50%;
+            background: conic-gradient(
+                {'green' if report.overall_trust_score > 0.8 else 'orange' if report.overall_trust_score > 0.6 else 'red'}
+                {report.overall_trust_score * 360}deg,
+                #f0f0f0 0deg
+            );
+            display: flex;
+            align-items: center;
+            justify-content: center;
+            font-size: 32px;
+            font-weight: bold;
+        }}
+        .category-score {{ margin: 10px; padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd; }}
+        .issue {{ margin: 10px 0; padding: 10px; border-left: 4px solid {'red' if issue.severity == 'critical' else 'orange' if issue.severity == 'high' else 'blue'}; }}
+    </style>
+</head>
+<body>
+    <h1>Code Review Report</h1>
+    <div class="score-circle">{report.overall_trust_score:.2f}</div>
+
+    <h2>Category Scores</h2>
+    <div>
+"""
+
+    for category, score in report.overall_category_scores.items():
+        html += f'<div class="category-score"><strong>{category.value.title()}:</strong> {score:.2f}</div>'
+
+    html += "</div>"
+
+    if report.critical_issues:
+        html += "<h2>Critical Issues</h2>"
+        for issue in report.critical_issues[:10]:
+            html += f'<div class="issue"><strong>{issue.title}</strong><br>'
+            html += f'Location: {issue.file_path}:{issue.line_number}<br>'
+            html += f'{issue.description}<br>'
+            html += f'<strong>Fix:</strong> {issue.suggested_fix}</div>'
+
+    html += "</body></html>"
+
+    return html
+```
+
+---
+
+## Team Collaboration
+
+### Pull Request Comments
+
+```python
+async def create_pr_review_comments(
+    report: CodeReviewReport,
+    pr_number: int,
+    github_client
+):
+    """Create review comments on pull request."""
+
+    # Group issues by file
+    issues_by_file = {}
+    for file_result in report.files_reviewed:
+        for issue in file_result.issues:
+            if issue.file_path not in issues_by_file:
+                issues_by_file[issue.file_path] = []
+            issues_by_file[issue.file_path].append(issue)
+
+    # Create review comments
+    for file_path, issues in issues_by_file.items():
+        for issue in issues[:5]:  # Limit comments per file
+            comment_body = f"""
+**{issue.title}**
+**Severity:** {issue.severity}
+**Description:** {issue.description}
+**Suggested Fix:** {issue.suggested_fix}
+
+[View Rule]({issue.external_reference}) if available
+"""
+
+            await github_client.create_review_comment(
+                pr_number=pr_number,
+                body=comment_body,
+                path=file_path,
+                line=issue.line_number
+            )
+```
+
+---
+
+## Continuous Monitoring
+
+### Trend Analysis
+
+```python
+class ReviewTrendAnalyzer:
+    """Analyze code review trends over time."""
+
+    def __init__(self, storage_path: str):
+        self.storage_path = storage_path
+
+    def save_review_report(self, report: CodeReviewReport, timestamp: float = None):
+        """Save review report for trend analysis."""
+
+        if timestamp is None:
+            timestamp = time.time()
+
+        report_data = {
+            'timestamp': timestamp,
+            'overall_score': report.overall_trust_score,
+            'category_scores': {cat.value: score for cat, score in report.overall_category_scores.items()},
+            'issue_counts': report.summary_metrics['issues_by_severity']
+        }
+
+        # Append to history file
+        with open(self.storage_path, 'a') as f:
+            f.write(json.dumps(report_data) + '\n')
+
+    def analyze_trends(self, days: int = 30) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+        """Analyze review trends over specified period."""
+
+        cutoff_time = time.time() - (days * 24 * 3600)
+        reports = []
+
+        # Load historical reports
+        with open(self.storage_path, 'r') as f:
+            for line in f:
+                report_data = json.loads(line.strip())
+                if report_data['timestamp'] >= cutoff_time:
+                    reports.append(report_data)
+
+        if not reports:
+            return {'error': 'No historical data available'}
+
+        # Calculate trends
+        scores = [r['overall_score'] for r in reports]
+        avg_score = sum(scores) / len(scores)
+
+        # Compare first and last
+        score_change = scores[-1] - scores[0]
+        trend = 'improving' if score_change > 0.01 else 'declining' if score_change < -0.01 else 'stable'
+
+        return {
+            'period_days': days,
+            'total_reviews': len(reports),
+            'average_score': avg_score,
+            'score_change': score_change,
+            'trend': trend,
+            'category_trends': self._calculate_category_trends(reports)
+        }
+```
+
+---
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Quality Gates: Set appropriate thresholds for project quality standards
+2. Incremental Rollout: Start with warning-only gates, gradually enforce
+3. Team Training: Educate team on review feedback and best practices
+4. Custom Rules: Customize rules for project-specific requirements
+5. Regular Updates: Keep security patterns and quality rules current
+6. Performance: Cache results to avoid redundant analysis
+7. Feedback Loop: Use review insights for continuous improvement
+8. Integration: Seamlessly integrate with existing CI/CD workflows
+
+---
+
+## Related Modules
+
+- [Automated Code Review](../automated-code-review.md): Main review system
+- [trust5-validation.md](../trust5-validation.md): Quality gate configuration
+
+---
+
+Version: 1.0.0
+Last Updated: 2026-01-06
+Module: `modules/automated-code-review/review-workflows.md`

moai_adk/templates/.claude/skills/moai-workflow-testing/modules/automated-code-review/trust5-framework/relevance-analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+# Relevance Analysis - TRUST 5 Framework
+
+> Module: Relevance category deep dive with requirements traceability and dead code detection
+> Parent: [TRUST 5 Framework](./trust5-framework.md)
+> Complexity: Advanced
+> Time: 10+ minutes
+> Dependencies: Python 3.8+, ast, requirements mapping
+
+## Overview
+
+Relevance (20% weight) validates requirements fulfillment and purpose alignment through feature completeness checks, requirements traceability, dead code identification, and purpose alignment validation.
+
+## Requirements Traceability
+
+### Missing Requirement Detection
+
+```python
+def validate_requirements_traceability(
+    self, file_path: str, content: str, requirements: List[str]
+) -> List[CodeIssue]:
+    """Validate requirements traceability in code."""
+
+    issues = []
+
+    # Check for unimplemented requirements
+    for req_id, requirement in requirements:
+        if req_id not in content:
+            issue = CodeIssue(
+                id=f"missing_requirement_{req_id}",
+                category=TrustCategory.RELEVANCE,
+                severity="medium",
+                issue_type="documentation_issue",
+                title="Missing Requirement Implementation",
+                description=f"Requirement {req_id} not found in code",
+                file_path=file_path,
+                line_number=1,
+                column_number=1,
+                code_snippet=f"# TODO: Implement {req_id}: {requirement}",
+                suggested_fix=f"Implement requirement {req_id}: {requirement}",
+                confidence=0.8,
+                rule_violated="MISSING_REQUIREMENT"
+            )
+            issues.append(issue)
+
+    return issues
+```
+
+## Dead Code Detection
+
+### Unused Function Detection
+
+```python
+def detect_dead_code(self, file_path: str, tree: ast.AST) -> List[CodeIssue]:
+    """Detect dead code (unused functions, classes, imports)."""
+
+    issues = []
+
+    # Find all defined functions
+    defined_functions = set()
+    for node in ast.walk(tree):
+        if isinstance(node, ast.FunctionDef):
+            defined_functions.add(node.name)
+
+    # Find all called functions
+    called_functions = set()
+    for node in ast.walk(tree):
+        if isinstance(node, ast.Call):
+            if isinstance(node.func, ast.Name):
+                called_functions.add(node.func.id)
+
+    # Identify unused functions (excluding main, test functions)
+    unused_functions = defined_functions - called_functions
+    for func_name in unused_functions:
+        if not func_name.startswith('_') and func_name not in ['main', 'test']:
+            # Find the function definition node
+            for node in ast.walk(tree):
+                if isinstance(node, ast.FunctionDef) and node.name == func_name:
+                    issue = CodeIssue(
+                        id=f"dead_code_{node.lineno}",
+                        category=TrustCategory.RELEVANCE,
+                        severity="low",
+                        issue_type="code_smell",
+                        title="Dead Code",
+                        description=f"Function '{func_name}' is never called",
+                        file_path=file_path,
+                        line_number=node.lineno,
+                        column_number=1,
+                        code_snippet=f"def {func_name}(...):",
+                        suggested_fix=f"Remove unused function '{func_name}' or update references",
+                        confidence=0.6,
+                        rule_violated="DEAD_CODE"
+                    )
+                    issues.append(issue)
+                    break
+
+    return issues
+```
+
+## Detection Patterns
+
+### Common Relevance Issues
+
+1. **Missing Requirements**: Specified features not implemented
+2. **Unused Functions**: Functions defined but never called
+3. **Unused Imports**: Imported modules not referenced
+4. **Dead Classes**: Classes defined but never instantiated
+5. **Commented Code**: Large blocks of commented-out code
+6. **TODO/FIXME**: Unresolved development markers
+7. **Feature Creep**: Code beyond original requirements
+
+### Purpose Alignment Analysis
+
+```python
+def check_purpose_alignment(
+    self, file_path: str, content: str, purpose: str
+) -> List[CodeIssue]:
+    """Check if code aligns with stated purpose."""
+
+    issues = []
+
+    # Analyze code complexity vs purpose
+    complexity = self._calculate_complexity(content)
+
+    # Check for over-engineering
+    if complexity > self._get_expected_complexity(purpose):
+        issue = CodeIssue(
+            id="over_engineered",
+            category=TrustCategory.RELEVANCE,
+            severity="low",
+            issue_type="code_smell",
+            title="Over-Engineered Solution",
+            description=f"Code complexity exceeds purpose requirements",
+            file_path=file_path,
+            suggested_fix="Simplify implementation to match purpose",
+            confidence=0.7,
+            rule_violated="PURPOSE_MISALIGNMENT"
+        )
+        issues.append(issue)
+
+    return issues
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Requirements Mapping: Maintain explicit requirement-to-code traceability
+2. Regular Cleanup: Remove dead code during refactoring
+3. Purpose Documentation: Document module/class/function purposes
+4. Complexity Monitoring: Monitor complexity growth vs requirements
+5. Impact Analysis: Analyze impact before removing dead code
+
+---
+
+Version: 1.0.0
+Last Updated: 2026-01-06