whiteport-design-studio 0.1.0

package/src/workflows/1-project-brief/project-brief/validation-report-project-brief.md

@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
+---
+validationDate: 2026-01-22
+workflowName: project-brief
+workflowPath: c:\dev\WDS\bmad-method-wds-expansion\src\workflows\1-project-brief\project-brief
+validationStatus: COMPLETE
+overallStatus: PASS_WITH_RECOMMENDATIONS
+criticalIssues: 0
+warnings: 1
+---
+
+# Validation Report: Project Brief Workflow
+
+**Validation Started:** 2026-01-22
+**Validator:** Wendy - BMAD Workflow Validation System
+**Standards Version:** BMAD v6 Workflow Standards
+
+---
+
+## File Structure & Size
+
+### Folder Structure
+
+```
+project-brief/
+├── complete/
+│   ├── workflow.md (61 lines)
+│   ├── instructions.md (172 lines)
+│   ├── project-brief.template.md (97 lines)
+│   └── steps/
+│       ├── step-01-init.md (27 lines)
+│       ├── step-02-vision.md (29 lines)
+│       ├── step-03-positioning.md (26 lines)
+│       ├── step-04-create-vtc.md (106 lines)
+│       ├── step-05-business-model.md (20 lines)
+│       ├── step-06-business-customers.md (24 lines)
+│       ├── step-07-target-users.md (27 lines)
+│       ├── step-08-success-criteria.md (29 lines)
+│       ├── step-09-competitive-landscape.md (32 lines)
+│       ├── step-10-constraints.md (29 lines)
+│       ├── step-10a-platform-strategy.md (81 lines)
+│       ├── step-11-create-vtc.md (96 lines)
+│       ├── step-11-tone-of-voice.md (182 lines)
+│       └── step-12-synthesize.md (33 lines)
+└── simplified/
+    ├── instructions.md (77 lines)
+    └── simplified-brief.template.md (15 lines)
+```
+
+**Structure Analysis:**
+- ✅ workflow.md exists (main entry point)
+- ✅ Two workflow variants: complete (comprehensive) and simplified (quick)
+- ✅ Complete variant: steps/ folder with 14 step files
+- ✅ Templates provided for both variants
+- ✅ Instructions.md for automation
+- ⚠️ **NON-STANDARD**: Folder named `steps/` instead of `steps-c/` (BMAD v6 tri-modal convention)
+
+### Files Present
+
+**Required Files:**
+- ✅ workflow.md - Main workflow entry point
+- ✅ Complete variant: 14 step files (step-01 through step-12, with step-10a and step-11 variants)
+- ✅ Simplified variant: Quick template for rapid brief creation
+- ✅ Templates for both output formats
+
+**Supporting Files:**
+- ✅ instructions.md (automation instructions for both variants)
+
+### File Size Check
+
+| File | Lines | Status |
+|------|-------|--------|
+| workflow.md | 61 | ✅ Good |
+| instructions.md | 172 | ✅ Good |
+| step-01-init.md | 27 | ✅ Good |
+| step-02-vision.md | 29 | ✅ Good |
+| step-03-positioning.md | 26 | ✅ Good |
+| step-04-create-vtc.md | 106 | ✅ Good |
+| step-05-business-model.md | 20 | ✅ Good |
+| step-06-business-customers.md | 24 | ✅ Good |
+| step-07-target-users.md | 27 | ✅ Good |
+| step-08-success-criteria.md | 29 | ✅ Good |
+| step-09-competitive-landscape.md | 32 | ✅ Good |
+| step-10-constraints.md | 29 | ✅ Good |
+| step-10a-platform-strategy.md | 81 | ✅ Good |
+| step-11-create-vtc.md | 96 | ✅ Good |
+| step-11-tone-of-voice.md | 182 | ✅ Good |
+| step-12-synthesize.md | 33 | ✅ Good |
+
+**All step files are well within the 250-line recommended limit.**
+
+### Issues Found
+
+1. ⚠️ **Folder Naming Convention**
+   - Current: `steps/`
+   - BMAD v6 Standard: `steps-c/` (create mode)
+   - Impact: Minor - this workflow is create-mode only
+   - Recommendation: Rename to `steps-c/` for tri-modal consistency
+
+### Status
+
+✅ **PASS** - File structure is clean and all step files are properly sized. Minor organizational recommendation for folder naming.
+
+---
+
+## Frontmatter Validation
+
+### Frontmatter Analysis
+
+**Step Files Checked:** 14 files (step-01 through step-12, with variants)
+
+**Finding:** None of the step files contain frontmatter (YAML between `---` markers).
+
+### Validation Results
+
+| File | Has Frontmatter | Next Step References | Status |
+|------|----------------|---------------------|--------|
+| All 14 step files | ❌ No | Hardcoded in "Next Step" sections | ✅ ACCEPTABLE |
+
+### Analysis
+
+**Pattern:** Step files use simplified format without frontmatter.
+
+**BMAD v6 Compliance:**
+- ✅ **ACCEPTABLE** - Frontmatter is optional when step files don't need variable references
+- ✅ Linear workflow progression with hardcoded next step references
+- ✅ State tracking happens in output document frontmatter (not step files)
+
+### Status
+
+✅ **PASS** - No frontmatter violations. Hardcoded next step references acceptable for linear workflow.
+
+---
+
+## Menu Handling Validation
+
+### Menu Analysis
+
+**Step Files Checked:** 14 files
+
+**Finding:** Step files auto-proceed without user menus.
+
+### Validation Results
+
+| Pattern | Status |
+|---------|--------|
+| Auto-proceed through all steps | ✅ CORRECT |
+| State tracking in output document | ✅ CORRECT |
+| User can pause/resume via frontmatter | ✅ CORRECT |
+
+### Analysis
+
+**Pattern:** Collaborative document building with auto-progression.
+
+**BMAD v6 Compliance:**
+- ✅ **CORRECT** - Product brief creation workflows should flow continuously
+- ✅ Each step gathers information and appends to document
+- ✅ State tracking via `stepsCompleted` array in output document frontmatter
+- ✅ User can pause and resume via state tracking
+
+### Status
+
+✅ **PASS** - Proper auto-proceed pattern for collaborative document creation.
+
+---
+
+## Step Type Validation
+
+**Step Structure Pattern:**
+- ✅ Purpose or Question section clearly states step goal
+- ✅ Context for Agent explains what to gather
+- ✅ Instructions provide conversation guidance
+- ✅ Output Format specified
+- ✅ Next Step references next file
+- ✅ Consistent collaborative, facilitative tone
+
+**Status:** ✅ PASS - Consistent step structure across all files.
+
+---
+
+## Output Format Validation
+
+**Product Brief Generation:**
+- ✅ Comprehensive template with strategic sections
+- ✅ VTC (Value Trigger Chain) integration at multiple points (steps 4 and 11)
+- ✅ Frontmatter with state tracking
+- ✅ Modular section assembly
+- ✅ Simplified variant for rapid brief creation
+
+**Output Formats:**
+- ✅ Complete brief: project-brief.md (comprehensive strategic document)
+- ✅ Simplified brief: simplified-brief.md (quick overview)
+
+**Status:** ✅ PASS - Comprehensive output format with flexibility.
+
+---
+
+## Workflow Design Check
+
+**Workflow Sequence:**
+1. ✅ Step 1: Initialize and set context
+2. ✅ Step 2: Vision - What are we building?
+3. ✅ Step 3: Positioning - How do we describe it?
+4. ✅ Step 4: Create VTC (Value Trigger Chain)
+5. ✅ Step 5: Business model
+6. ✅ Step 6: Business customers
+7. ✅ Step 7: Target users
+8. ✅ Step 8: Success criteria
+9. ✅ Step 9: Competitive landscape
+10. ✅ Step 10: Constraints
+11. ✅ Step 10a: Platform strategy
+12. ✅ Step 11: Tone of voice (with VTC variant)
+13. ✅ Step 12: Synthesize into final document
+
+**Workflow Coverage:**
+- ✅ Strategic foundation (vision, positioning, VTC)
+- ✅ Business context (model, customers, competition)
+- ✅ User understanding (target users, success criteria)
+- ✅ Execution context (constraints, platform strategy)
+- ✅ Brand voice and synthesis
+
+**Status:** ✅ PASS - Comprehensive workflow covering all strategic aspects of product brief creation.
+
+---
+
+## Instruction Style Check
+
+**BMAD v6 Compliance:**
+- ✅ Collaborative, facilitative tone
+- ✅ Clear questions and conversation starters
+- ✅ Guidance-focused without over-scripting
+- ✅ Proper balance of structure and flexibility
+
+**Example from step-02-vision.md:**
+> "Work as equals with the user. You bring structured thinking, they bring vision."
+
+**Status:** ✅ PASS - Instructions follow BMAD v6 collaborative, facilitative pattern.
+
+---
+
+## Collaborative Experience Check
+
+**User Interaction Pattern:**
+- ✅ workflow.md provides clear workflow purpose
+- ✅ Two variants: complete (comprehensive) vs simplified (quick)
+- ✅ Continuous document building with state tracking
+- ✅ VTC integration at strategic points
+- ✅ Synthesis step brings all sections together
+
+**Philosophy Alignment:**
+- ✅ "Work as equals" - properly implemented
+- ✅ "Structured thinking + domain expertise" - balanced collaboration
+- ✅ "Append-only building" - progressive document assembly
+
+**Status:** ✅ PASS - Excellent collaborative experience with workflow flexibility.
+
+---
+
+## Cohesive Review
+
+### Strengths
+
+1. **Clean Micro-File Architecture**
+   - All 14 step files well within size limits (20-182 lines)
+   - Excellent file size discipline
+   - Clear progression from vision → business → users → execution
+
+2. **Strategic Depth**
+   - Comprehensive coverage of product brief requirements
+   - VTC integration at multiple strategic points
+   - Platform strategy and tone of voice included
+
+3. **Workflow Flexibility**
+   - Complete variant for comprehensive briefs
+   - Simplified variant for rapid overview
+   - State tracking enables pause/resume
+
+4. **BMAD v6 Compliance**
+   - Collaborative, facilitative tone
+   - Clear purpose and context sections
+   - Proper append-only document building
+
+### Areas for Enhancement
+
+1. **Folder Naming** (Minor)
+   - Current: `steps/`
+   - BMAD v6 Standard: `steps-c/` for create mode
+   - **Action:** Rename for tri-modal consistency
+
+2. **Documentation** (Enhancement)
+   - Could add examples of completed product briefs
+   - Could add tips for different product types (SaaS vs mobile vs platform)
+
+### Critical Issues
+
+**None found.** This is a well-designed, BMAD v6 compliant workflow.
+
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+**Validation Date:** 2026-01-22
+**Workflow:** Project Brief Workflow
+**Overall Status:** ✅ **PASS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS**
+
+### Validation Results
+
+| Check | Status | Critical Issues | Warnings | Notes |
+|-------|--------|----------------|----------|-------|
+| File Structure & Size | ✅ PASS | 0 | 1 | Minor folder naming recommendation |
+| Frontmatter Validation | ✅ PASS | 0 | 0 | Simplified format acceptable |
+| Menu Handling | ✅ PASS | 0 | 0 | Correct auto-proceed pattern |
+| Step Type Validation | ✅ PASS | 0 | 0 | Consistent collaborative structure |
+| Output Format | ✅ PASS | 0 | 0 | Comprehensive with flexibility |
+| Workflow Design | ✅ PASS | 0 | 0 | Complete strategic coverage |
+| Instruction Style | ✅ PASS | 0 | 0 | BMAD v6 compliant facilitative guidance |
+| Collaborative Experience | ✅ PASS | 0 | 0 | Excellent collaborative design |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+**✅ Strengths:**
+- Excellent micro-file architecture with disciplined file sizes
+- Comprehensive strategic coverage (vision, business, users, execution)
+- VTC integration at multiple strategic points
+- Workflow flexibility (complete vs simplified variants)
+- Strong collaborative, facilitative tone
+- State tracking enables pause/resume
+
+**⚠️ Recommendation:**
+1. Rename `steps/` to `steps-c/` for BMAD v6 tri-modal consistency
+
+**🎯 Conclusion:**
+This is a **production-ready, well-designed workflow** that properly follows BMAD v6 standards. The recommendation is a minor organizational enhancement for consistency.
+
+**Recommended Action:** Deploy as-is, implement folder rename in future iteration for consistency.
+
+---
+
+**Audit Completed:** 2026-01-22
+**Next Audit Scheduled:** Optional - after folder naming update
+
+---
+
+_Generated by Wendy - BMAD Workflow Validation System_

package/src/workflows/1-project-brief/workflow.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+---
+name: project-brief
+description: Establish project context - foundation for all design work
+author: "Whiteport Design Studio"
+phase: 1
+web_bundle: true
+standalone: true
+primary_agent: "saga-analyst"
+
+# Critical variables from config
+config_source: "{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/wds/config.yaml"
+output_folder: "{config_source}:output_folder"
+user_name: "{config_source}:user_name"
+project_name: "{config_source}:project_name"
+communication_language: "{config_source}:communication_language"
+document_output_language: "{config_source}:document_output_language"
+date: system-generated
+
+# Brief level from workflow status
+brief_level: "{output_folder}/wds-workflow-status.yaml:config.brief_level"
+
+# Workflow components
+installed_path: "{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/wds/workflows/1-project-brief"
+
+# Route to appropriate workflow based on brief_level
+workflows:
+  simplified:
+    instructions: "{installed_path}/project-brief/simplified/instructions.md"
+    template: "{installed_path}/project-brief/simplified/simplified-brief.template.md"
+  complete:
+    instructions: "{installed_path}/project-brief/complete/workflow.md"
+    template: "{installed_path}/project-brief/complete/project-brief.template.md"
+    steps: "{installed_path}/project-brief/complete/steps"
+
+# Output configuration
+output_file: "{output_folder}/A-Product-Brief/project-brief.md"
+---

package/src/workflows/2-trigger-mapping/REVIEW-FINDINGS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+# Trigger Mapping Phase - Review Findings
+
+**Date:** December 27, 2025  
+**Reviewer:** Saga (via User Request)  
+**Status:** ✅ ALL ISSUES RESOLVED
+
+---
+
+## Issues Found and Resolved
+
+### ✅ 1. Main Instructions Missing Workshop 5 Reference
+
+**File:** `instructions.md` (main trigger mapping orchestrator)  
+**Issue:** Step 6 mentions only 5 workshops in intro, but documentation section doesn't reference Workshop 5 (Feature Impact)
+
+**FIXED:**
+- Updated intro to list 4 core workshops + 1 optional (Feature Impact)
+- Added Step 5.5 as optional Feature Impact workshop call
+- User is asked if they want to run Feature Impact before handover
+- Removed old "Step 6: Documentation" in favor of handover workflow
+
+**Impact:** Medium - Users don't know Feature Impact workshop exists  
+**Resolution:** ✅ Complete
+
+---
+
+### ✅ 2. Inconsistent Workshop Numbering
+
+**Issue:** Main instructions lists workshops 1-5 but "Documentation" is workflow step 6, while Feature Impact is Workshop 5
+
+**FIXED:**
+- Clarified structure: 4 core workshops (1-4)
+- Feature Impact is optional Workshop 5
+- Documentation generation moved to handover workflow
+- Clear separation between workshops and documentation
+
+**Impact:** Low - Confusing but functional  
+**Resolution:** ✅ Complete
+
+---
+
+### ✅ 3. Project-Specific Examples in Generic Instructions
+
+**Files:** Multiple instruction and template files contained WDS-specific examples
+**Issue:** Generic workflow should use neutral, reusable examples - not tied to any specific project
+
+**FIXED:**
+- Removed WDS-specific transformation example ("designers from overwhelmed...")
+- Replaced with generic example ("users from frustrated manual processors...")
+- Changed "adapted by WDS" to "adapted for WDS framework"
+- Changed "Generated by Whiteport Design Studio" to "Generated with Whiteport Design Studio framework"
+- Removed specific example path references
+- Made all handover language role-based ("UX Designer" with agent name in parentheses)
+- Battle Cry remains only in WDS example documentation (where it belongs)
+
+**Impact:** Low - Instructions are now project-agnostic and reusable  
+**Resolution:** ✅ Complete - All examples are now generic and framework-focused
+
+---
+
+### ✅ 4. Feature Impact Not in Main Flow
+
+**File:** `instructions.md` (main)  
+**Issue:** Feature Impact workshop exists but isn't loaded in main workflow
+
+**FIXED:**
+- Added Step 5.5 (optional) to main workflow
+- Asks user if they want to run Feature Impact
+- If yes: loads workshop instructions
+- If no: proceeds to handover with note that it can be run later
+
+**Impact:** High - Feature is hidden  
+**Resolution:** ✅ Complete
+
+---
+
+### ✅ 5. Link Format Inconsistency
+
+**Files:** Mermaid diagram instructions  
+**Issue:** Uses markdown link to step file, but should just load directly like others
+
+**FIXED:**
+- Removed markdown link format
+- Changed to BMad v6 format with `<workflow>` tag
+- Uses `<action>Load and execute:` format
+- Consistent with other workflows
+
+**Impact:** Low - Still works but inconsistent with other workflows  
+**Resolution:** ✅ Complete
+
+---
+
+### ✅ 6. No Clear Entry Point for Feature Impact
+
+**Issue:** Feature Impact workshop has no parent that loads it
+
+**FIXED:**
+- Main instructions now include Step 5.5 (optional)
+- User is explicitly asked if they want to run it
+- Clear entry point before documentation/handover
+- Can also be run standalone if needed
+
+**Impact:** High - Usability issue  
+**Resolution:** ✅ Complete
+
+---
+
+## Additional Improvements Made
+
+### ✅ 7. Handover Workflow Integration
+
+**Added:**
+- Trigger Mapping now ends with handover workflow, not raw documentation
+- Handover calls document generation internally
+- Adds cross-references
+- Performs quality check
+- Creates handover package for Freya
+- Provides activation instructions
+
+**Benefit:** Clean phase transition with proper context for next agent
+
+---
+
+### ✅ 8. Incremental UX Handover Pattern
+
+**Updated:**
+- UX Design handover supports MULTIPLE calls (not one-time)
+- Can hand off per scenario, per page, or per flow segment
+- Enables continuous delivery (design + development in parallel)
+- Tracks deliveries in log file
+- Provides activation for each delivery
+
+**Benefit:** True agile workflow with small, frequent deliveries
+
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+**Total Issues Found:** 6  
+**Total Issues Resolved:** 6 ✅  
+**Additional Improvements:** 2 ✅  
+
+**Status:** ✅ **ALL ISSUES RESOLVED**  
+**Date Resolved:** December 27, 2025
+
+---
+
+## Verification
+
+All changes have been implemented and verified:
+
+1. ✅ Main workflow updated with Feature Impact as optional Step 5.5
+2. ✅ Battle Cry generation added to Workshop 4
+3. ✅ Mermaid diagram instructions use consistent `<action>` format
+4. ✅ Handover workflow integrated for clean phase transitions
+5. ✅ Documentation generation called within handover
+6. ✅ UX Design supports incremental handovers
+7. ✅ All workflows use BMad v6 micro-instruction pattern
+
+**Trigger Mapping Phase is now complete and consistent!** 🎉

package/src/workflows/2-trigger-mapping/document-generation/instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+# Workflow: Generate Trigger Map Documentation
+
+<critical>You are Saga the Analyst - precise, meticulous, and a master of documentation structure.</critical>
+
+<workflow>
+
+<intro>
+<output>I will now generate your complete Trigger Map documentation following the WDS standard structure.
+
+**START HERE:** I'll begin with Step 1.
+
+Do NOT skip ahead. Follow each step sequentially.</output>
+<action>Load and execute: steps/step-01-generate-hub.md</action>
+</intro>
+
+</workflow>