tribunal-kit 9.0.2 → 9.2.3

package/skills/agentic-patterns/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: agentic-patterns
-description: Use when AI agent design principles. Agent loops, tool calling, memory architectures, multi-agent coordination, human-in-the-loop gates, and guardrails. Use when building AI agents, autonomous workflows, or any system where an LLM plans and executes multi-step tasks.
+description: "Use when AI agent design principles. Agent loops, tool calling, memory architectures, multi-agent coordination, human-in-the-loop gates, and guardrails. Use when building AI agents, autonomous workflows, or any system where an LLM plans and executes multi-step tasks."
 version: 5.0.0
 last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
@@ -16,42 +16,12 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Agentic Patterns
 
-## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
-
-Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `agentic-patterns` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
-
-1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
-2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
-3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
-4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
-5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
-
-## Activation Boundaries
-
-- **Activate when:** Use when AI agent design principles. Agent loops, tool calling, memory architectures, multi-agent coordination, human-in-the-loop gates, and guardrails. Use when building AI agents, autonomous workflows, or any system where an LLM plans and executes multi-step tasks.
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `agentic-patterns` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
-
-## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
-
-Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
-
-| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
-| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
-| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
-| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
-| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
-| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
-| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
-
 ---
 
 ## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
 
 ---
 
-
 ---
 
 ## The Agent Loop
@@ -309,48 +279,3 @@ Checks:      ✅ [N passed] · ⚠️  [N warnings] · ❌ [N blocked]
 VBC status:  PENDING → VERIFIED
 Evidence:    [link to terminal output, test result, or file diff]
 ```
-
----
-
-## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
-
-| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
-| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
-| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
-| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
-| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
-
----
-
-## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
-
-| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Hallucinated Tool Capabilities** | Assuming an external library or CLI command exists without verification | Run a verification check or verify package.json before referencing tools |
-| **Premature Completion Claim** | Declaring a task finished because code was generated without verification | Execute tests, linters, or terminal commands to provide concrete proof |
-| **Context Bloat Dumping** | Pasting entire multi-thousand-line files into prompt context | Extract targeted excerpts, symbols, and signatures to preserve tokens |
-
----
-
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
-
-**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` · `agent-organizer` · `logic-reviewer`
-**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
-
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
-
-```
-✅ Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
-✅ Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
-✅ Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
-✅ Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
-✅ Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
-```
-
-### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
-
-**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/skills/agentic-workflows-2026/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: agentic-workflows-2026
-description: Use when Advanced 2026-2027 AI agent loops, ReAct planning, structured tool calling via Zod/Pydantic, streaming generative UI, and human-in-the-loop gates.
+description: "Use when Advanced 2026-2027 AI agent loops, ReAct planning, structured tool calling via Zod/Pydantic, streaming generative UI, and human-in-the-loop gates."
 version: 5.0.0
 last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
@@ -17,35 +17,6 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Agentic Workflows 2026 — Multi-Agent Architecture
 
-## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
-
-Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `agentic-workflows-2026` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
-
-1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
-2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
-3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
-4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
-5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
-
-## Activation Boundaries
-
-- **Activate when:** Use when Advanced 2026-2027 AI agent loops, ReAct planning, structured tool calling via Zod/Pydantic, streaming generative UI, and human-in-the-loop gates.
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `agentic-workflows-2026` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
-
-## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
-
-Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
-
-| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
-| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
-| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
-| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
-| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
-| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
-| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
-
 ---
 
 ## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
@@ -110,48 +81,3 @@ export async function runAgentLoop(task: string, maxTurns = 10) {
        ├── Dispatch Worker B (Database) ──> WorkerResult B ──┼─> [Promise.allSettled Synthesis]
        └── Dispatch Worker C (Frontend) ──> WorkerResult C ──┘
 ```
-
----
-
-## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
-
-| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
-| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
-| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
-| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
-| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
-
----
-
-## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
-
-| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Unchecked Payload Cast** | Casting request bodies to TypeScript types without runtime schema validation | Parse request payloads through Zod/Pydantic schemas before business logic |
-| **Silent Error Swallowing** | Catching errors with empty catch blocks or logging without rethrowing | Propagate structured errors with status codes and contextual stack traces |
-| **Unparameterized Query** | Concatenating user inputs into SQL/Prisma query strings | Always use parameterized bindings or type-safe ORM query builders |
-
----
-
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
-
-**Active Reviewers:** `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor` · `api-architect` · `resilience-reviewer`
-**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
-
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
-
-```
-✅ Are all inputs and boundary payloads validated against schemas (Zod/Pydantic)?
-✅ Are SQL and database queries parameterized with zero string concatenation?
-✅ Are error boundaries and timeout/retry policies explicitly declared?
-✅ Are authentication checks performed before business logic execution?
-✅ Did I verify that imported dependencies exist in package.json/requirements.txt?
-```
-
-### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
-
-**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/skills/ai-app-hardening/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: ai-app-hardening
-description: Use when OWASP Top 10 for LLMs (2026), prompt injection defense, model output sanitization, indirect injection defense, and automated SBOM dependency security.
+description: "Use when OWASP Top 10 for LLMs (2026), prompt injection defense, model output sanitization, indirect injection defense, and automated SBOM dependency security."
 version: 5.0.0
 last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
@@ -17,35 +17,6 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # AI Application Hardening & Indirect Prompt Injection Defense
 
-## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
-
-Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `ai-app-hardening` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
-
-1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
-2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
-3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
-4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
-5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
-
-## Activation Boundaries
-
-- **Activate when:** Use when OWASP Top 10 for LLMs (2026), prompt injection defense, model output sanitization, indirect injection defense, and automated SBOM dependency security.
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `ai-app-hardening` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
-
-## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
-
-Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
-
-| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
-| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
-| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
-| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
-| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
-| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
-| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
-
 ---
 
 ## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
@@ -78,48 +49,3 @@ export function sanitizeRAGDocument(rawDocumentContent: string): string {
 | **LLM02** | Insecure Output Handling             | Strict Zod output parsing + DOMPurify on frontend   |
 | **LLM04** | Model Denial of Service              | Hard `max_tokens` limit + IP bucket rate limiting   |
 | **LLM07** | System Prompt Leakage                | System prompt redaction guards in output stream     |
-
----
-
-## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
-
-| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
-| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
-| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
-| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
-| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
-
----
-
-## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
-
-| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Hardcoded Secret Pattern** | Committing API keys, tokens, or private salts into source code | Load credentials strictly via runtime environment variables and secret stores |
-| **Prompt Injection Surface** | Directly concatenating untrusted user input into LLM system prompts | Wrap user content in isolated delimiters and strip injection control sequences |
-| **Missing Authorization Check** | Relying only on authentication token presence without checking tenant/object RBAC | Verify user permissions against the specific target record ID before mutation |
-
----
-
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
-
-**Active Reviewers:** `security-auditor` · `penetration-tester` · `backend-security-expert`
-**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
-
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
-
-```
-✅ Are user inputs sanitized and treated as untrusted at system boundaries?
-✅ Are secrets loaded strictly via environment variables with zero hardcoding?
-✅ Is least-privilege enforcement active on APIs, tokens, and storage buckets?
-✅ Are prompt-injection delimiters and sanitizers wrapped around LLM inputs?
-✅ Did I verify encryption in transit and at rest for sensitive customer data?
-```
-
-### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
-
-**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/skills/ai-prompt-injection-defense/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: ai-prompt-injection-defense
-description: Use when Prompt Injection and Jailbreak defense mastery. Mitigation strategies for direct injection, indirect injection via data poisoning, delimiter separation, XML framing, output validation, and LLM circuit breakers. Use when building AI systems that process untrusted user input or fetch external data.
+description: "Use when Prompt Injection and Jailbreak defense mastery. Mitigation strategies for direct injection, indirect injection via data poisoning, delimiter separation, XML framing, output validation, and LLM circuit breakers. Use when building AI systems that process untrusted user input or fetch external data."
 version: 5.0.0
 last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
@@ -15,42 +15,12 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Prompt Injection Defense — AI Security Mastery
 
-## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
-
-Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `ai-prompt-injection-defense` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
-
-1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
-2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
-3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
-4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
-5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
-
-## Activation Boundaries
-
-- **Activate when:** Use when Prompt Injection and Jailbreak defense mastery. Mitigation strategies for direct injection, indirect injection via data poisoning, delimiter separation, XML framing, output validation, and LLM circuit breakers. Use when building AI systems that process untrusted user input or fetch external data.
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `ai-prompt-injection-defense` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
-
-## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
-
-Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
-
-| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
-| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
-| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
-| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
-| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
-| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
-| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
-
 ---
 
 ## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
 
 ---
 
-
 ## 2026 AI Prompt Injection & Sandboxing Invariants
 
 1. **Dual-LLM Pattern (Privileged vs Untrusted)**:
@@ -190,48 +160,3 @@ Many injections occur because the LLM includes malicious data in its output, whi
 
 - **Always sanitize LLM output.** Do not render Markdown or HTML from an LLM as unescaped raw HTML (`dangerouslySetInnerHTML`).
 - **Enforce JSON Schemas.** If the LLM goes off-script and starts blabbering, Zod validation should instantly fail the parsing and reject the output.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
-
-| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
-| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
-| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
-| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
-| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
-
----
-
-## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
-
-| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Hardcoded Secret Pattern** | Committing API keys, tokens, or private salts into source code | Load credentials strictly via runtime environment variables and secret stores |
-| **Prompt Injection Surface** | Directly concatenating untrusted user input into LLM system prompts | Wrap user content in isolated delimiters and strip injection control sequences |
-| **Missing Authorization Check** | Relying only on authentication token presence without checking tenant/object RBAC | Verify user permissions against the specific target record ID before mutation |
-
----
-
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
-
-**Active Reviewers:** `security-auditor` · `penetration-tester` · `backend-security-expert`
-**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
-
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
-
-```
-✅ Are user inputs sanitized and treated as untrusted at system boundaries?
-✅ Are secrets loaded strictly via environment variables with zero hardcoding?
-✅ Is least-privilege enforcement active on APIs, tokens, and storage buckets?
-✅ Are prompt-injection delimiters and sanitizers wrapped around LLM inputs?
-✅ Did I verify encryption in transit and at rest for sensitive customer data?
-```
-
-### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
-
-**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/skills/animation-on-scroll/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: animation-on-scroll
-description: Use when building performant scroll-driven animations, CSS scroll-timeline, view-timeline reveals, GSAP ScrollTrigger scrollytelling, or Framer Motion scroll indicators without scroll jank or layout thrashing.
+description: "Use when building performant scroll-driven animations, CSS scroll-timeline, view-timeline reveals, GSAP ScrollTrigger scrollytelling, or Framer Motion scroll indicators without scroll jank or layout thrashing."
 version: 5.0.0
 last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
@@ -16,35 +16,6 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Animation On Scroll — Precision Scroll-Driven Architecture & Scrollytelling
 
-## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
-
-Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `animation-on-scroll` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
-
-1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
-2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
-3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
-4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
-5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
-
-## Activation Boundaries
-
-- **Activate when:** Use when building performant scroll-driven animations, CSS scroll-timeline, view-timeline reveals, GSAP ScrollTrigger scrollytelling, or Framer Motion scroll indicators without scroll jank or layout thrashing.
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `animation-on-scroll` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
-
-## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
-
-Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
-
-| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
-| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
-| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
-| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
-| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
-| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
-| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
-
 ---
 
 ## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
@@ -53,25 +24,22 @@ Scroll motion connects physical gesture with dynamic interface reveals. Poorly e
 
 ---
 
-
 ---
 
-
 ---
 
-
 ---
 
 ## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
 
 ### 1. Engine Selection Matrix
 
-| Use Case | Recommended Engine | Rationale |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Single-Element Entrance Wipe** | Pure CSS `animation-timeline: view()` | 0 KB JS overhead, executes on GPU compositor thread |
-| **Page-Top Progress Indicator** | Pure CSS `animation-timeline: scroll()` | Zero re-renders, zero layout shifts |
-| **Multi-Stage Pinned Scrollytelling** | GSAP `ScrollTrigger` | Pin spacer mechanics, scrubbing interpolation, timeline nesting |
-| **React Component State Scrubbing** | Framer Motion `useScroll` + `useTransform` | Declarative hook integration with React rendering lifecycle |
+| Use Case                              | Recommended Engine                         | Rationale                                                       |
+| :------------------------------------ | :----------------------------------------- | :-------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **Single-Element Entrance Wipe**      | Pure CSS `animation-timeline: view()`      | 0 KB JS overhead, executes on GPU compositor thread             |
+| **Page-Top Progress Indicator**       | Pure CSS `animation-timeline: scroll()`    | Zero re-renders, zero layout shifts                             |
+| **Multi-Stage Pinned Scrollytelling** | GSAP `ScrollTrigger`                       | Pin spacer mechanics, scrubbing interpolation, timeline nesting |
+| **React Component State Scrubbing**   | Framer Motion `useScroll` + `useTransform` | Declarative hook integration with React rendering lifecycle     |
 
 ---
 
@@ -136,8 +104,12 @@ export function initScrollytelling(container: HTMLElement) {
 
   steps.forEach((step, index) => {
     if (index === 0) return;
-    tl.to(steps[index - 1], { opacity: 0, y: -30, duration: 0.4 })
-      .fromTo(step, { opacity: 0, y: 40 }, { opacity: 1, y: 0, duration: 0.6 }, '-=0.2');
+    tl.to(steps[index - 1], { opacity: 0, y: -30, duration: 0.4 }).fromTo(
+      step,
+      { opacity: 0, y: 40 },
+      { opacity: 1, y: 0, duration: 0.6 },
+      '-=0.2',
+    );
   });
 
   return () => {
@@ -181,7 +153,9 @@ export function ParallaxHeroCard() {
         className="sticky top-24 w-full max-w-2xl p-8 rounded-3xl bg-neutral-900 border border-neutral-800 shadow-2xl"
       >
         <h2 className="text-2xl font-semibold text-white">Fluid Reactive Scrubbing</h2>
-        <p className="mt-2 text-neutral-400">Zero unthrottled scroll listeners. Offloaded to motion GPU pipeline.</p>
+        <p className="mt-2 text-neutral-400">
+          Zero unthrottled scroll listeners. Offloaded to motion GPU pipeline.
+        </p>
       </motion.div>
     </div>
   );
@@ -220,48 +194,3 @@ export function ParallaxHeroCard() {
   }
 }
 ```
-
----
-
-## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
-
-| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
-| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
-| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
-| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
-| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
-
----
-
-## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
-
-| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
-|:---|:---|:---|
-| **The Instant Pop Trap** | Conditionally unmounting elements without animated interpolation | Use AnimatePresence or coordinate morphs with continuous geometry |
-| **Layout Thrashing** | Animating width, height, top, or left inside animation loops | Animate composite-only transform (translate3d, scale) and opacity |
-| **Sluggish Duration** | Setting micro-interaction transitions to 600ms+ causing interface lag | Cap interactive feedback at 160ms–240ms with snappy ease-out curves |
-
----
-
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
-
-**Active Reviewers:** `frontend-reviewer` · `motion-reviewer` · `ui-ux-auditor`
-**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
-
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
-
-```
-✅ Does animation maintain 60fps/120fps using transform and opacity?
-✅ Is optical mass conserved across state interpolations without volume collapse?
-✅ Is duration capped within micro-interaction budgets (160ms–280ms)?
-✅ Is prefers-reduced-motion respected with graceful instant fallbacks?
-✅ Did I prevent layout thrashing and continuous geometry mutations?
-```
-
-### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
-
-**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.