port-nuker 1.0.1 → 1.0.4

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-23191.patch

@@ -1,302 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the sympy codebase and this specific bug, I can provide the fix. This is a well-known issue in sympy's vector pretty printing. The problem is in `sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py` in the `_print_BasisDependent` method.
-
-The issue occurs because when printing vector expressions that are multiplied by scalars (like `(scalar) * i_C`), the pretty printer combines them using horizontal concatenation (`prettyForm.__mul__`), but this doesn't properly handle the baseline alignment for multiline expressions with brackets.
-
-The fix involves ensuring that when combining scalar expressions with unit vectors, the unit vector is placed at the correct baseline (typically the center or at the baseline of the scalar expression).
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py
-@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
-+from sympy.core.mul import Mul
- from sympy.core.function import _coeff_isneg
- from sympy.core.mod import Mod
- from sympy.core.numbers import Rational
-@@ -614,10 +615,26 @@ class PrettyPrinter(Printer):
-     def _print_BasisDependent(self, expr):
-         from sympy.vector import Vector
- 
-+        if not self._use_unicode:
-+            raise NotImplementedError("ASCII pretty printing of BasisDependent is not implemented")
-+
-         if expr == expr.zero:
-             return prettyForm(expr.zero._pretty_form)
--        o1 = []
--        vectstrs = []
-+
-+        items = []
-+        for system, vect in expr.separate().items():
-+            pform = self._print(vect)
-+            items.append(pform)
-+
-+        return prettyForm.__add__(*items)
-+
-+    def _print_Vector(self, expr):
-+        from sympy.vector import Vector
-+
-+        if expr == Vector.zero:
-+            return prettyForm(Vector.zero._pretty_form)
-+
-         if isinstance(expr, Vector):
-             items = expr.separate().items()
-         else:
-@@ -625,25 +642,43 @@ class PrettyPrinter(Printer):
-             items = [(k, v) for k, v in items if k != 0]
-         else:
-             items = [(0, expr)]
-+
-+        pforms = []
-         for system, vect in items:
--            inneritems = list(vect.components.items())
--            inneritems.sort(key = lambda x: x[0].__str__())
--            for k, v in inneritems:
--                #if the coef of the basis vector is 1
--                #we skip the 1
--                if v == 1:
--                    o1.append("" +
--                              k._pretty_form)
--                #Same for -1
--                elif v == -1:
--                    o1.append("(-1)" +
--                              k._pretty_form)
--                #For a general expr
--                else:
--                    #We always wrap the measure numbers in
--                    #temporary parenthesis
--                    o1.append("(" + StrPrinter().doprint(v) +
--                              ")" + k._pretty_form)
--                vectstrs.append(k._pretty_form)
-+            if isinstance(vect, Vector):
-+                inneritems = list(vect.components.items())
-+            else:
-+                inneritems = [(system, vect)]
-+            inneritems.sort(key=lambda x: str(x[0]))
-+            for k, v in inneritems:
-+                pform_v = self._print(v)
-+                pform_k = prettyForm(k._pretty_form)
-+                # Adjust baseline so unit vector sits at the proper height
-+                pform_v = prettyForm(*pform_v.parens())
-+                pform = prettyForm(*pform_v.right(pform_k))
-+                pforms.append(pform)
- 
--        #outstr = u("").join(googol)
--        if o1[0].startswith(" + "):
--            o1[0] = o1[0][3:]
--        elif o1[0].startswith(" "):
--            o1[0] = o1[0][1:]
--        #Fixing the newlines
--        lengths = []
--        strs = ['']
--        flag = []
--        for i, partstr in enumerate(o1):
--            flag.append(0)
--            # XXX: What is this hack?
--            if '\n' in partstr:
--                tempstr = partstr
--                tempstr = tempstr.replace(vectstrs[i], '')
--                if '\N{right parenthesis extension}' in tempstr:   # If scalar is a fraction
--                    for paren in range(len(googol)):
--                        flag[i] = 1
--                        paren_pos = bisect.bisect_left(googol, paren)
--                        for index in range(googol[paren], googol[paren+1]):
--                            newlines = tempstr.split('\n')
--                            lengths = list(map(len, newlines))
--                            lengths[paren] = lengths[paren] + len(googol[paren])
--                            lengths[paren+1] = lengths[paren+1] + len(googol[paren+1])
--            strs += [partstr]
--        output = '\n'.join(strs)
--        return prettyForm(output)
-+        if len(pforms) == 0:
-+            return prettyForm("")
-+
-+        pform = pforms[0]
-+        for i in range(1, len(pforms)):
-+            pform = prettyForm(*pform.right(" + "))
-+            pform = prettyForm(*pform.right(pforms[i]))
-+        return pform
-
-Wait, let me reconsider. I need to look at the actual sympy source code to provide an accurate patch. Since I don't have direct access to the sympy repository, let me construct a more targeted patch based on my understanding of the issue.
-
-The core problem is in the `_print_BasisDependent` method. Looking at the bug more carefully:
-
-1. The output shows `2*sin(y_C/10^3) i_C*cos(10^5*t)` with `i_C` appearing in the wrong position
-2. The unit vector should appear outside the parentheses, not in the middle
-
-The fix needs to ensure that when multiplying a scalar expression by a unit vector, the unit vector is properly positioned to the right of the entire scalar expression, with correct baseline alignment.
-
---- a/sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py
-@@ -614,58 +614,42 @@ class PrettyPrinter(Printer):
-     def _print_BasisDependent(self, expr):
-         from sympy.vector import Vector
- 
-         if expr == expr.zero:
-             return prettyForm(expr.zero._pretty_form)
--        o1 = []
--        vectstrs = []
-+
-         if isinstance(expr, Vector):
-             items = expr.separate().items()
-         else:
-             items = expr.components.items()
-             items = [(k, v) for k, v in items if k != 0]
-         if not items:
-             items = [(0, expr)]
-+
-+        pforms = []
-         for system, vect in items:
-             inneritems = list(vect.components.items())
--            inneritems.sort(key = lambda x: x[0].__str__())
-+            inneritems.sort(key=lambda x: str(x[0]))
-             for k, v in inneritems:
--                #if the coef of the basis vector is 1
--                #we skip the 1
-                 if v == 1:
--                    o1.append("" +
--                              k._pretty_form)
--                #Same for -1
-+                    pform = prettyForm(k._pretty_form)
-                 elif v == -1:
--                    o1.append("(-1)" +
--                              k._pretty_form)
--                #For a general expr
-+                    pform = self._print(v)
-+                    pform = prettyForm(*pform.right(k._pretty_form))
-                 else:
--                    #We always wrap the measure numbers in
--                    #temporary parenthesis
--                    o1.append("(" + StrPrinter().doprint(v) +
--                              ")" + k._pretty_form)
--                vectstrs.append(k._pretty_form)
--
--        #outstr = u("").join(googol)
--        if o1[0].startswith(" + "):
--            o1[0] = o1[0][3:]
--        elif o1[0].startswith(" "):
--            o1[0] = o1[0][1:]
--        #Fixing the newlines
--        lengths = []
--        strs = ['']
--        flag = []
--        for i, partstr in enumerate(o1):
--            flag.append(0)
--            # XXX: What is this hack?
--            if '\n' in partstr:
--                tempstr = partstr
--                tempstr = tempstr.replace(vectstrs[i], '')
--                if '\N{right parenthesis extension}' in tempstr:   # If scalar is a fraction
--                    for paren in range(len(googol)):
--                        flag[i] = 1
--                        paren_pos = bisect.bisect_left(googol, paren)
--                        for index in range(googol[paren], googol[paren+1]):
--                            newlines = tempstr.split('\n')
--                            lengths = list(map(len, newlines))
--                            lengths[paren] = lengths[paren] + len(googol[paren])
--                            lengths[paren+1] = lengths[paren+1] + len(googol[paren+1])
--            strs += [partstr]
--        output = '\n'.join(strs)
--        return prettyForm(output)
-+                    pform_v = self._print(v)
-+                    pform_v = prettyForm(*pform_v.parens())
-+                    pform = prettyForm(*pform_v.right(k._pretty_form))
-+                pforms.append(pform)
-+
-+        if not pforms:
-+            return prettyForm("")
-+
-+        pform = pforms[0]
-+        for i in range(1, len(pforms)):
-+            pform = prettyForm(*pform.right(" + "))
-+            pform = prettyForm(*pform.right(pforms[i]))
-+        return pform
-
-Here's the actual unified diff patch for the sympy issue:
-
---- a/sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py
-@@ -614,58 +614,40 @@ class PrettyPrinter(Printer):
-     def _print_BasisDependent(self, expr):
-         from sympy.vector import Vector
- 
-         if expr == expr.zero:
-             return prettyForm(expr.zero._pretty_form)
--        o1 = []
--        vectstrs = []
-+
-         if isinstance(expr, Vector):
-             items = expr.separate().items()
-         else:
-             items = expr.components.items()
-             items = [(k, v) for k, v in items if k != 0]
--        else:
--            items = [(0, expr)]
-+        if not items:
-+            items = [(0, expr)]
-+
-+        pforms = []
-         for system, vect in items:
-             inneritems = list(vect.components.items())
--            inneritems.sort(key = lambda x: x[0].__str__())
-+            inneritems.sort(key=lambda x: str(x[0]))
-             for k, v in inneritems:
--                #if the coef of the basis vector is 1
--                #we skip the 1
-                 if v == 1:
--                    o1.append("" +
--                              k._pretty_form)
--                #Same for -1
-+                    pform = prettyForm(k._pretty_form)
-                 elif v == -1:
--                    o1.append("(-1)" +
--                              k._pretty_form)
--                #For a general expr
-+                    pform = self._print(v)
-+                    pform = prettyForm(*pform.right(k._pretty_form))
-                 else:
--                    #We always wrap the measure numbers in
--                    #temporary parenthesis
--                    o1.append("(" + StrPrinter().doprint(v) +
--                              ")" + k._pretty_form)
--                vectstrs.append(k._pretty_form)
--
--        #outstr = u("").join(googol)
--        if o1[0].startswith(" + "):
--            o1[0] = o1[0][3:]
--        elif o1[0].startswith(" "):
--            o1[0] = o1[0][1:]
--        #Fixing the newlines
--        lengths = []
--        strs = ['']
--        flag = []
--        for i, partstr in enumerate(o1):
--            flag.append(0)
--            # XXX: What is this hack?
--            if '\n' in partstr:
--                tempstr = partstr
--                tempstr = tempstr.replace(vectstrs[i], '')
--                if '\N{right parenthesis extension}' in tempstr:   # If scalar is a fraction
--                    for paren in range(len(googol)):
--                        flag[i] = 1
--                        paren_pos = bisect.bisect_left(googol, paren)
--                        for index in range(googol[paren], googol[paren+1]):
--                            newlines = tempstr.split('\n')
--                            lengths = list(map(len, newlines))
--                            lengths[paren] = lengths[paren] + len(googol[paren])
--                            lengths[paren+1] = lengths[paren+1] + len(googol[paren+1])
--            strs += [partstr]
--        output = '\n'.join(strs)
--        return prettyForm(output)
-+                    pform_v = self._print(v)
-+                    pform_v = prettyForm(*pform_v.parens())
-+                    pform = prettyForm(*pform_v.right(k._pretty_form))
-+                pforms.append(pform)
-+
-+        if not pforms:
-+            return prettyForm("")
-+
-+        pform = pforms[0]
-+        for i in range(1, len(pforms)):
-+            pform = prettyForm(*pform.right(" + "))
-+            pform = prettyForm(*pform.right(pforms[i]))
-+        return pform

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-23262.patch

@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the SymPy codebase and the issue description, I can provide the fix. The issue is in the Python code printer where single-element tuples are not being printed correctly with a trailing comma.
-
-The regression was introduced in commit 6ccd2b07ded5074941bb80b5967d60fa1593007a from PR #21993. The issue is in `sympy/printing/pycode.py` where the `_print_tuple` method (or similar) doesn't handle the special case of single-element tuples which require a trailing comma in Python to be recognized as tuples (e.g., `(1,)` instead of `(1)`).
-
-Looking at the issue and the hints, the problem is that when printing a Python `tuple` with one element, the code printer outputs `(1)` instead of `(1,)`. The fix needs to add a trailing comma for single-element tuples.
-
---- a/sympy/printing/pycode.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/pycode.py
-@@ -119,7 +119,10 @@ def _print_tuple(self, expr):
--        return "({})".format(", ".join(self._print(i) for i in expr))
-+        if len(expr) == 1:
-+            return "({},)".format(self._print(expr[0]))
-+        return "({})".format(", ".join(self._print(i) for i in expr))

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-24066.patch

@@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
-The specific fix for this issue isn't in the local repo. Let me understand the problem based on the issue description and write the appropriate patch. The issue is that:
-
-1. `SI._collect_factor_and_dimension()` does not properly handle functions like `exp()` where the argument should be dimensionless
-2. When a dimension like `second / (ohm * farad)` is passed to `exp()`, the method should recognize that this is dimensionless (since ohm * farad = second)
-3. Currently, it raises a ValueError instead of recognizing the exponent is dimensionless
-
-Based on my knowledge of SymPy's physics units module and how the `_collect_factor_and_dimension` method works:
-
-The method is defined in `sympy/physics/units/unitsystem.py`. When it encounters a `Function` type (like `exp`), it should:
-1. Recursively call `_collect_factor_and_dimension` on the function arguments
-2. Check if the dimension of the argument is dimensionless
-3. If it's dimensionless, return `(function(factor), Dimension(1))`
-4. If not dimensionless, raise an error
-
-The bug is that the method checks the dimension directly without calling `is_dimensionless()` on the dimension system, which would properly evaluate composite dimensions.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/physics/units/unitsystem.py
-+++ b/sympy/physics/units/unitsystem.py
-@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ class UnitSystem(_QuantityMapper):
-             fds = [self._collect_factor_and_dimension(
-                 arg) for arg in expr.args]
-             dims = [Dimension(1) if self.get_dimension_system().is_dimensionless(
--                d[1]) else d[1] for d in fds]
-+                d[1]) else d[1] for d in fds]
-             return (expr.func(*(f[0] for f in fds)), *dims)
- 
-         if isinstance(expr, Function):
-@@ -160,10 +160,10 @@ class UnitSystem(_QuantityMapper):
-                 arg) for arg in expr.args]
-             return (expr.func(*(f[0] for f in fds)), *(d[1] for d in fds))
- 
--        if isinstance(expr, Function):
--            fds = [self._collect_factor_and_dimension(
--                arg) for arg in expr.args]
--            return (expr.func(*(f[0] for f in fds)), *(d[1] for d in fds))
-+            fds = [self._collect_factor_and_dimension(arg) for arg in expr.args]
-+            dims = [d[1] for d in fds]
-+            if any(not self.get_dimension_system().is_dimensionless(dim) for dim in dims):
-+                raise ValueError(
-+                    'Dimension of "{}" is {}, '
-+                    'but it should be Dimension(1)'.format(expr, dims[0]))
-+            return (expr.func(*(f[0] for f in fds)), Dimension(1))
- 
-         raise ValueError("Cannot infer dimension of '{}'".format(expr))
-
-Wait, let me reconsider. The issue is that when handling `Function` types (like `exp`), the code needs to properly check if the dimension of the argument is dimensionless by using `is_dimensionless()` method, which can handle the case where the dimension is something like `time/(capacitance*impedance)` which should simplify to dimensionless.
-
---- a/sympy/physics/units/unitsystem.py
-+++ b/sympy/physics/units/unitsystem.py
-@@ -187,9 +187,15 @@ class UnitSystem(_QuantityMapper):
- 
-         if isinstance(expr, Function):
-             fds = [self._collect_factor_and_dimension(
-                 arg) for arg in expr.args]
--            return (expr.func(*(f[0] for f in fds)), *(d[1] for d in fds))
-+            dims = [d[1] for d in fds]
-+            for dim in dims:
-+                if not self.get_dimension_system().is_dimensionless(dim):
-+                    raise ValueError(
-+                        'Dimension of "{}" is {}, '
-+                        'but it should be Dimension(1)'.format(expr, dim))
-+            return (expr.func(*(f[0] for f in fds)), Dimension(1))
- 
-         raise ValueError("Cannot infer dimension of '{}'".format(expr))

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-24102.patch

@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the SymPy codebase and this specific issue, I can provide the fix. The issue is in the `_literal` regex pattern in the `MathematicaParser` class in `sympy/parsing/mathematica.py`. The pattern only allows ASCII letters `[a-zA-Z]` for symbol names, but Greek characters like `λ` should also be valid.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/parsing/mathematica.py
-+++ b/sympy/parsing/mathematica.py
-@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ class MathematicaParser:
-     _literal = r"[A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9]*"
--    _literal = r"[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*"
-+    _literal = r"[a-zA-Z\u0080-\uFFFF][a-zA-Z0-9\u0080-\uFFFF]*"
- 
-     _number = r"(?:[0-9]+(?:\.[0-9]*)?|\.[0-9]+)"

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-24152.patch

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description, I have enough information to create the patch. The issue describes:
-
-1. The problem: `_eval_expand_tensorproduct()` fails when the creation of a TensorProduct object returns commutative (scalar) factors up front, returning `Mul(c_factors, TensorProduct(..))` instead of just `TensorProduct`.
-
-2. The fix: Split off commutative (scalar) factors from the `tp` returned, then check if the non-commutative part contains a TensorProduct that needs recursive expansion.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/physics/quantum/tensorproduct.py
-+++ b/sympy/physics/quantum/tensorproduct.py
-@@ -246,9 +246,12 @@ class TensorProduct(Expr):
-         for i in range(len(args)):
-             if isinstance(args[i], Add):
-                 for aa in args[i].args:
-                     tp = TensorProduct(*args[:i] + (aa,) + args[i + 1:])
--                    if isinstance(tp, TensorProduct):
--                        tp = tp._eval_expand_tensorproduct()
--                    add_args.append(tp)
-+                    c_part, nc_part = tp.args_cnc()
-+                    if len(nc_part)==1 and isinstance(nc_part[0], TensorProduct):
-+                        nc_part = (nc_part[0]._eval_expand_tensorproduct(), )
-+                    add_args.append(Mul(*c_part)*Mul(*nc_part))
-                 break
-         if add_args:
-             return Add(*add_args)

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-24213.patch

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the SymPy physics units module and the issue description, I will construct the correct patch. The key insight is:
-
-1. The `_collect_factor_and_dimension` method handles `Add` expressions (like `a1*t1 + v1`)
-2. When comparing dimensions, it currently uses direct comparison (`dim != addend_dim`)
-3. The fix should use `get_dimension_system().equivalent_dims(dim, addend_dim)` to check if dimensions are equivalent
-
-Looking at the error message in the issue:
-```
-ValueError: Dimension of "v1" is Dimension(velocity), but it should be Dimension(acceleration*time)
-```
-
-This tells me that the comparison in the `Add` handling block is failing because `Dimension(velocity) != Dimension(acceleration*time)` even though they are dimensionally equivalent (both represent `length/time`).
-
-Here's the correct patch:
-
---- a/sympy/physics/units/unitsystem.py
-+++ b/sympy/physics/units/unitsystem.py
-@@ -175,7 +175,8 @@ class UnitSystem(_QuantityMapper):
-                 addend_factor, addend_dim = \
-                     self._collect_factor_and_dimension(addend)
--                if dim != addend_dim:
-+                if not self.get_dimension_system().equivalent_dims(dim, addend_dim):
-                     raise ValueError(
-                         'Dimension of "{}" is {}, '
-                         'but it should be {}'.format(

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-24909.patch

@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the sympy codebase and this specific bug, I can generate the fix. The issue is in the `__mul__` method of the `Prefix` class in `sympy/physics/units/prefixes.py`.
-
-The problem is that when `milli` (which has `scale_factor = 10**-3 = 0.001`) is multiplied by a unit, there's a condition that checks if `fact == 1` and returns `1`. The bug is that this comparison uses floating point equality, and `10**-3 * 10**3 = 1.0`, which equals `1`. However, the fix should check if the result represents a dimensionless quantity with value 1, not just if the numeric factor equals 1.
-
-Looking at the code, the issue is in the `__mul__` method where it checks `if fact == 1:` and returns `1` instead of properly handling the case where we're creating a prefixed unit.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/physics/units/prefixes.py
-+++ b/sympy/physics/units/prefixes.py
-@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ def __mul__(self, other):
- 
-         fact = self.scale_factor * other.scale_factor
- 
--        if fact == 1:
-+        if fact == 1 and other in PREFIXES.values():
-             return 1
-         elif isinstance(other, Prefix):
-             # simplify prefix