port-nuker 1.0.1 → 1.0.4

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/pytest-dev__pytest-5103.patch

@@ -1,345 +0,0 @@
-This is a standalone task to generate a patch for the pytest-dev/pytest repository. I need to create the patch based on my knowledge of pytest's assertion rewriting system and the issue requirements.
-
-Based on my understanding of:
-1. pytest's assertion rewriting in `src/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py`
-2. The issue requesting better error messages for `all()` and `any()` 
-3. The AST-based approach pytest uses
-
-Here's the patch to add support for unrolling `all()` and `any()` calls:
-
---- a/src/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py
-+++ b/src/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py
-@@ -868,6 +868,59 @@ class AssertionRewriter(ast.NodeVisitor):
-                 )
-             return make_call(res, builtin("repr"), [comparator])
- 
-+    def visit_Call_all_any(
-+        self, call: ast.Call
-+    ) -> Optional[Tuple[ast.Name, str]]:
-+        """Special handling for all()/any() with comprehension arguments.
-+        
-+        Unrolls the comprehension to find and display the first failing element.
-+        Returns None if the call cannot be handled specially.
-+        """
-+        if not isinstance(call.func, ast.Name):
-+            return None
-+        if call.func.id not in ("all", "any"):
-+            return None
-+        if len(call.args) != 1:
-+            return None
-+        if call.keywords:
-+            return None
-+            
-+        arg = call.args[0]
-+        if not isinstance(arg, (ast.GeneratorExp, ast.ListComp)):
-+            return None
-+        
-+        # Only handle simple single-for comprehensions
-+        if len(arg.generators) != 1:
-+            return None
-+        gen = arg.generators[0]
-+        if gen.is_async:
-+            return None
-+
-+        func_name = call.func.id
-+        is_all = func_name == "all"
-+        
-+        # Construct a new call that iterates and finds the failing element
-+        # We use a helper from _pytest._code.assertion_helper
-+        from_mod = ast.ImportFrom(
-+            module="_pytest.assertion._unroll",
-+            names=[ast.alias(name="_unroll_all_any", asname=None)],
-+            level=0,
-+        )
-+        self.statements.append(from_mod)
-+        
-+        # Build: _unroll_all_any(<comprehension>, is_all=True/False)
-+        helper_call = ast.Call(
-+            func=ast.Name("_unroll_all_any", ast.Load()),
-+            args=[arg],
-+            keywords=[ast.keyword(arg="is_all", value=ast.Constant(is_all))],
-+        )
-+        
-+        res = self.variable()
-+        self.statements.append(ast.Assign([ast.Name(res, ast.Store())], helper_call))
-+        
-+        return ast.Name(res, ast.Load()), "%(" + res + ")s"
-+
-     def visit_Call(self, call: ast.Call) -> Tuple[ast.Name, str]:
-+        # Try special handling for all()/any() first
-+        result = self.visit_Call_all_any(call)
-+        if result is not None:
-+            return result
-+        
-         new_func, func_expl = self.visit(call.func)
-         arg_expls = []
-         new_args = []
-
-Wait, I should provide the complete patch. Based on my analysis of pytest's assertion rewriting (the AssertionRewriter class in `src/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py`), I need to:
-
-1. Modify the `visit_Call` method to detect `all()`/`any()` calls with comprehensions
-2. Rewrite them to iterate through and find the first failing element
-3. Display that element in the error message
-
-Here is the complete patch:
-
---- a/src/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py
-+++ b/src/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py
-@@ -868,6 +868,119 @@ class AssertionRewriter(ast.NodeVisitor):
-         return res, self.explanation_param(self.pop_format_context(expl_call))
- 
-     def visit_Call(self, call: ast.Call) -> Tuple[ast.Name, str]:
-+        """Handle Call nodes, with special treatment for all()/any()."""
-+        # Try to handle all()/any() specially for better error messages
-+        if (
-+            isinstance(call.func, ast.Name)
-+            and call.func.id in ("all", "any")
-+            and len(call.args) == 1
-+            and not call.keywords
-+            and isinstance(call.args[0], (ast.GeneratorExp, ast.ListComp))
-+        ):
-+            return self._visit_all_any(call)
-+        
-+        return self._visit_call_default(call)
-+
-+    def _visit_all_any(self, call: ast.Call) -> Tuple[ast.Name, str]:
-+        """Handle all()/any() calls with comprehension arguments.
-+        
-+        Unrolls the comprehension to iterate and find the first failing element,
-+        providing a more useful error message.
-+        """
-+        func_name = call.func.id
-+        is_all = func_name == "all"
-+        arg = call.args[0]
-+        
-+        # Only handle simple single-for comprehensions
-+        generators = arg.generators
-+        if len(generators) != 1:
-+            return self._visit_call_default(call)
-+        
-+        gen = generators[0]
-+        if gen.is_async:
-+            return self._visit_call_default(call)
-+        
-+        # Create variables for the iteration
-+        iter_var = self.variable()
-+        result_var = self.variable()
-+        fail_elem_var = self.variable()
-+        fail_cond_var = self.variable()
-+        
-+        # Evaluate the iterable and store it
-+        iter_res, iter_expl = self.visit(gen.iter)
-+        self.statements.append(
-+            ast.Assign([ast.Name(iter_var, ast.Store())], iter_res)
-+        )
-+        
-+        # Initialize result to True for all(), False for any()
-+        self.statements.append(
-+            ast.Assign(
-+                [ast.Name(result_var, ast.Store())],
-+                ast.Constant(is_all),
-+            )
-+        )
-+        # Initialize fail tracking variables
-+        self.statements.append(
-+            ast.Assign([ast.Name(fail_elem_var, ast.Store())], ast.Constant(None))
-+        )
-+        self.statements.append(
-+            ast.Assign([ast.Name(fail_cond_var, ast.Store())], ast.Constant(None))
-+        )
-+        
-+        # Build the for loop body that checks each element
-+        import copy
-+        target_copy = copy.deepcopy(gen.target)
-+        elt_copy = copy.deepcopy(arg.elt)
-+        
-+        # Store the condition result
-+        cond_var = self.variable()
-+        
-+        # For all(): if not cond, fail
-+        # For any(): if cond, succeed
-+        if is_all:
-+            test = ast.UnaryOp(ast.Not(), ast.Name(cond_var, ast.Load()))
-+            fail_result = ast.Constant(False)
-+        else:
-+            test = ast.Name(cond_var, ast.Load())
-+            fail_result = ast.Constant(True)
-+        
-+        # Build: cond_var = <element test>
-+        # Apply if clauses from the comprehension
-+        loop_body = [
-+            ast.Assign([ast.Name(cond_var, ast.Store())], elt_copy)
-+        ]
-+        
-+        # If condition fails, record and break
-+        fail_block = [
-+            ast.Assign([ast.Name(result_var, ast.Store())], fail_result),
-+            ast.Assign([ast.Name(fail_elem_var, ast.Store())], copy.deepcopy(gen.target)),
-+            ast.Assign([ast.Name(fail_cond_var, ast.Store())], ast.Name(cond_var, ast.Load())),
-+            ast.Break(),
-+        ]
-+        
-+        check_block = ast.If(test, fail_block, [])
-+        
-+        # Handle if clauses in the comprehension
-+        for if_clause in gen.ifs:
-+            check_block = ast.If(copy.deepcopy(if_clause), [check_block], [])
-+        
-+        loop_body.append(check_block)
-+        
-+        loop = ast.For(
-+            target=target_copy,
-+            iter=ast.Name(iter_var, ast.Load()),
-+            body=loop_body,
-+            orelse=[],
-+        )
-+        self.statements.append(loop)
-+        
-+        # Format the explanation to show the failing element
-+        expl = "{}({} for {} in {})".format(func_name, "%(" + fail_cond_var + ")s", "%(" + fail_elem_var + ")s", iter_expl)
-+        
-+        return ast.Name(result_var, ast.Load()), expl
-+
-+    def _visit_call_default(self, call: ast.Call) -> Tuple[ast.Name, str]:
-+        """Default handling for Call nodes."""
-         new_func, func_expl = self.visit(call.func)
-         arg_expls = []
-         new_args = []
-
-Hmm, I realize I should look at the actual structure of pytest more carefully. The issue is from around pytest 4.4.0 era. Let me reconsider the approach.
-
-Looking at the issue more carefully:
-- The user wants better error messages when using `all()` or `any()` with comprehensions
-- Currently: `assert all([is_even(number) for number in even_stevens])` shows `all([False, False, False, ...])`
-- Desired: Show which specific element failed, like the for loop version does
-
-The patch needs to:
-1. Detect `all()`/`any()` calls with generator expressions or list comprehensions
-2. Transform them to iterate through elements and find the first failing one
-3. Display that element clearly in the error message
-
---- a/src/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py
-+++ b/src/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py
-@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
- """Rewrite assertion AST to produce nice error messages."""
-+import copy
- import ast
- import errno
- import functools
-@@ -868,6 +869,115 @@ class AssertionRewriter(ast.NodeVisitor):
-         return res, self.explanation_param(self.pop_format_context(expl_call))
- 
-     def visit_Call(self, call: ast.Call) -> Tuple[ast.Name, str]:
-+        """Handle Call nodes, with special treatment for all()/any()."""
-+        # Try to handle all()/any() specially for better error messages
-+        if self._is_unrollable_all_any(call):
-+            return self._visit_all_any_call(call)
-+        return self._visit_call_fallback(call)
-+
-+    def _is_unrollable_all_any(self, call: ast.Call) -> bool:
-+        """Check if this is an all()/any() call we can unroll."""
-+        if not isinstance(call.func, ast.Name):
-+            return False
-+        if call.func.id not in ("all", "any"):
-+            return False
-+        if len(call.args) != 1:
-+            return False
-+        if call.keywords:
-+            return False
-+        arg = call.args[0]
-+        if not isinstance(arg, (ast.GeneratorExp, ast.ListComp)):
-+            return False
-+        if len(arg.generators) != 1:
-+            return False
-+        gen = arg.generators[0]
-+        if gen.is_async:
-+            return False
-+        return True
-+
-+    def _visit_all_any_call(self, call: ast.Call) -> Tuple[ast.Name, str]:
-+        """Handle all()/any() by unrolling to find the failing element."""
-+        func_name = call.func.id
-+        is_all = func_name == "all"
-+        arg = call.args[0]
-+        gen = arg.generators[0]
-+        
-+        # Create tracking variables
-+        result_var = self.variable()
-+        fail_elem_var = self.variable()  
-+        fail_expl_var = self.variable()
-+        iter_var = self.variable()
-+        
-+        # Store format context
-+        self.push_format_context()
-+        
-+        # Evaluate and store the iterable
-+        iter_res, iter_expl = self.visit(gen.iter)
-+        self.statements.append(
-+            ast.Assign([ast.Name(iter_var, ast.Store())], iter_res)
-+        )
-+        
-+        # Initialize result (True for all, False for any)
-+        self.statements.append(
-+            ast.Assign([ast.Name(result_var, ast.Store())], ast.Constant(is_all))
-+        )
-+        self.statements.append(
-+            ast.Assign([ast.Name(fail_elem_var, ast.Store())], ast.Constant(None))
-+        )
-+        self.statements.append(
-+            ast.Assign([ast.Name(fail_expl_var, ast.Store())], ast.Constant(""))
-+        )
-+        
-+        # Build the loop target and element test
-+        target = copy.deepcopy(gen.target)
-+        elt = copy.deepcopy(arg.elt)
-+        
-+        # Create inner variable for condition
-+        cond_var = self.variable()
-+        
-+        # Build loop body: evaluate condition, check if failed
-+        # For all(): condition must be True, so check "not cond"
-+        # For any(): condition must be True to succeed, check "cond"
-+        
-+        loop_body = []
-+        # Evaluate the condition: cond_var = <elt>
-+        loop_body.append(ast.Assign([ast.Name(cond_var, ast.Store())], elt))
-+        
-+        # Check failure condition
-+        if is_all:
-+            test = ast.UnaryOp(ast.Not(), ast.Name(cond_var, ast.Load()))
-+            new_result = ast.Constant(False)
-+        else:
-+            test = ast.Name(cond_var, ast.Load())
-+            new_result = ast.Constant(True)
-+        
-+        # When condition triggers, save the failing element info and break
-+        fail_body = [
-+            ast.Assign([ast.Name(result_var, ast.Store())], new_result),
-+            ast.Assign([ast.Name(fail_elem_var, ast.Store())], copy.deepcopy(gen.target)),
-+            ast.Break(),
-+        ]
-+        
-+        # Build the if check, wrapped with any comprehension conditions
-+        inner_check = ast.If(test, fail_body, [])
-+        for if_clause in reversed(gen.ifs):
-+            inner_check = ast.If(copy.deepcopy(if_clause), [inner_check], [])
-+        
-+        loop_body.append(inner_check)
-+        
-+        loop = ast.For(
-+            target=target,
-+            iter=ast.Name(iter_var, ast.Load()),
-+            body=loop_body,
-+            orelse=[],
-+        )
-+        self.statements.append(loop)
-+        
-+        expl = "{}({{{}}} for {{{}}} in {})".format(func_name, cond_var, fail_elem_var, iter_expl)
-+        expl = self.pop_format_context(ast.Constant(expl))
-+        return ast.Name(result_var, ast.Load()), self.explanation_param(expl)
-+
-+    def _visit_call_fallback(self, call: ast.Call) -> Tuple[ast.Name, str]:
-+        """Default handling for Call nodes."""
-         new_func, func_expl = self.visit(call.func)
-         arg_expls = []
-         new_args = []

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/pytest-dev__pytest-5221.patch

@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
-Let me look at this from the pytest source code perspective. Based on my knowledge of the pytest codebase, I can provide the patch for this issue. The `--fixtures` option displays fixture information in `_pytest/python.py`, and the fixture scope is stored in the `FixtureDef` class.
-
-```
---- a/src/_pytest/python.py
-+++ b/src/_pytest/python.py
-@@ -1340,6 +1340,8 @@ def _showfixtures_main(config, session):
-         if verbose <= 0 and argname.startswith("_"):
-             continue
-         tw.write(argname, green=True)
-+        if fixturedef.scope != "function":
-+            tw.write(" -- %s scoped" % fixturedef.scope, cyan=True)
-         tw.write(" -- %s" % bestrel, yellow=True)
-         tw.line()
-         if fixturedef.doc:
-```
-
-Wait, let me reconsider the approach. The issue requests showing fixture scope for all fixtures, not just non-function scoped ones. Let me provide a more complete patch:
-
---- a/src/_pytest/python.py
-+++ b/src/_pytest/python.py
-@@ -1340,6 +1340,7 @@ def _showfixtures_main(config, session):
-         if verbose <= 0 and argname.startswith("_"):
-             continue
-         tw.write(argname, green=True)
-+        tw.write(" -- %s" % fixturedef.scope, cyan=True)
-         tw.write(" -- %s" % bestrel, yellow=True)
-         tw.line()
-         if fixturedef.doc:

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/pytest-dev__pytest-5227.patch

@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-Based on the context of this task, I'm being asked to generate a patch for the pytest-dev/pytest repository. This is an issue about improving the default logging format in pytest. I don't have the pytest source code in the local codebase, but I can generate the patch based on the issue description which clearly states:
-
-1. Current format: `DEFAULT_LOG_FORMAT = "%(filename)-25s %(lineno)4d %(levelname)-8s %(message)s"`
-2. Proposed format: `DEFAULT_LOG_FORMAT = "%(levelname)-8s %(name)s:%(filename)s:%(lineno)d %(message)s"`
-
-The file that contains this would be in pytest's logging plugin, typically at `src/_pytest/logging.py`. Let me generate the patch:
-
---- a/src/_pytest/logging.py
-+++ b/src/_pytest/logging.py
-@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ from typing import Mapping
- from typing import Optional
- from typing import Union
- 
--DEFAULT_LOG_FORMAT = "%(filename)-25s %(lineno)4d %(levelname)-8s %(message)s"
-+DEFAULT_LOG_FORMAT = "%(levelname)-8s %(name)s:%(filename)s:%(lineno)d %(message)s"
- DEFAULT_LOG_DATE_FORMAT = "%H:%M:%S"

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/pytest-dev__pytest-5413.patch

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-It appears the pytest repository isn't cloned here. Based on the issue, I need to examine the ExceptionInfo class in `src/_pytest/_code/code.py`. Let me look at the GitHub reference in the issue:
-
-The issue mentions line 537-542 in `src/_pytest/_code/code.py` where `__str__` is defined. Based on the discussion:
-
-1. The current `__str__` method shows something like `<console>:3: LookupError: A` instead of the full exception message
-2. The consensus is to delete the `__str__` method entirely so that `__repr__` takes over
-
-Let me provide the patch based on the issue description. The current implementation shows:
-
-```python
-def __str__(self) -> str:
-    if self._excinfo is None:
-        return repr(self)
-    entry = self.traceback[-1]
-    loc = ReprFileLocation(entry.path, entry.lineno + 1, self.exconly())
-    return str(loc)
-```
-
-The fix is to simply delete this `__str__` method.
-
---- a/src/_pytest/_code/code.py
-+++ b/src/_pytest/_code/code.py
-@@ -534,11 +534,6 @@ class ExceptionInfo(Generic[E]):
-             raise TypeError("cannot set __traceback__ to {!r}".format(x))
-         self._excinfo = (self._excinfo[0], self._excinfo[1], x)
- 
--    def __str__(self) -> str:
--        if self._excinfo is None:
--            return repr(self)
--        entry = self.traceback[-1]
--        loc = ReprFileLocation(entry.path, entry.lineno + 1, self.exconly())
--        return str(loc)
--
-     @property
-     def value(self) -> E:

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/pytest-dev__pytest-5495.patch

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the pytest codebase and the issue description, I can provide the patch. The issue is in the `_pytest/assertion/util.py` file where the sequence comparison generates the "Right contains more items, first extra item: X" message. For byte strings, this shows the integer value (ASCII ordinal) rather than something more meaningful.
-
-The fix should skip the "contains more items" messaging for bytes objects, as suggested in the hint. Here's the patch:
-
---- a/src/_pytest/assertion/util.py
-+++ b/src/_pytest/assertion/util.py
-@@ -258,11 +258,13 @@ def _compare_eq_sequence(
-     explanation: List[str] = []
-     len_left = len(left)
-     len_right = len(right)
-     for i in range(min(len_left, len_right)):
-         if left[i] != right[i]:
-             explanation += [
-                 f"At index {i} diff: {left[i]!r} != {right[i]!r}"
-             ]
-             break
-     len_diff = len_right - len_left
--    if len_diff > 0:
-+    if len_diff > 0 and not isinstance(left, bytes):
-         explanation.append(f"Right contains {len_diff} more item{'s' if len_diff > 1 else ''}, first extra item: {right[len_left]!r}")
--    elif len_diff < 0:
-+    elif len_diff < 0 and not isinstance(right, bytes):
-         explanation.append(f"Left contains {-len_diff} more item{'s' if len_diff < -1 else ''}, first extra item: {left[len_right]!r}")
-     return explanation

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/pytest-dev__pytest-5692.patch

@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
-This repository doesn't contain the pytest source code. Since this is asking about fixing a GitHub issue in pytest-dev/pytest, I need to provide a patch based on my knowledge of the pytest codebase. The JUnit XML reporting in pytest is handled by `src/_pytest/junitxml.py`.
-
-Based on my knowledge of pytest's junitxml.py implementation and the issue requesting `hostname` and `timestamp` properties in the testsuite XML element, here's the patch:
-
---- a/src/_pytest/junitxml.py
-+++ b/src/_pytest/junitxml.py
-@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
- """Report test results in JUnit-XML format, for use with Jenkins and build
- integration servers.
- 
-+Based on initial code from Ross Lawley.
-+
- Output conforms to
- https://github.com/jenkinsci/xunit-plugin/blob/master/
- src/main/resources/org/jenkinsci/plugins/xunit/types/model/xsd/junit-10.xsd
-@@ -8,6 +10,8 @@ src/main/resources/org/jenkinsci/plugins/xunit/types/model/xsd/junit-10.xsd
- import functools
- import os
- import re
-+import platform
-+from datetime import datetime
- from typing import Callable
- from typing import Dict
- from typing import List
-@@ -652,6 +656,8 @@ class LogXML:
-             numtests=self.stats["passed"]
-             + self.stats["failure"]
-             + self.stats["error"],
-+            hostname=platform.node(),
-+            timestamp=datetime.fromtimestamp(self.suite_start_time).isoformat(),
-         )
-         logfile.write(Junit.testsuite(self._get_global_properties_node(), *suite_node))
-         logfile.close()

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/pytest-dev__pytest-6116.patch

@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the pytest codebase, I can provide the patch. The `--collect-only` option is defined in `src/_pytest/main.py` in the pytest repository. The fix involves adding `--co` as an alias to the existing `--collect-only` option.
-
---- a/src/_pytest/main.py
-+++ b/src/_pytest/main.py
-@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ def pytest_addoption(parser: Parser) -> None:
-     group.addoption(
-         "--collect-only",
-         "--collectonly",
-+        "--co",
-         action="store_true",
-         help="only collect tests, don't execute them.",
-     )

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/pytest-dev__pytest-7168.patch

@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
-This is not the pytest repository. I need to work on the pytest-dev/pytest repository. Since this is a GitHub issue about pytest, I need to understand the issue from the traceback and create a patch for the `saferepr.py` file.
-
-Let me analyze the issue from the problem statement:
-
-1. The issue is in `_pytest/_io/saferepr.py`
-2. The problem occurs when `obj.__class__.__name__` is accessed, but the object has a broken `__getattribute__` method
-3. The fix should change `obj.__class__.__name__` to `type(obj).__name__` to avoid calling the object's `__getattribute__`
-
-Based on the traceback, I can see the relevant code that needs to be fixed is in `_format_repr_exception` at line 23:
-```python
-exc_info, obj.__class__.__name__, id(obj)
-```
-
-This should be changed to:
-```python
-exc_info, type(obj).__name__, id(obj)
-```
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/src/_pytest/_io/saferepr.py
-+++ b/src/_pytest/_io/saferepr.py
-@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ def _format_repr_exception(exc: BaseException, obj: Any) -> str:
-         exc_info = "unknown"
-     return "<[{} raised in repr()] {} object at 0x{:x}>".format(
--        exc_info, obj.__class__.__name__, id(obj)
-+        exc_info, type(obj).__name__, id(obj)
-     )