port-nuker 1.0.1 → 1.0.4

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-18532.patch

@@ -1,130 +0,0 @@
-The sympy repository is not in the current working directory. Based on the issue description and discussion, I understand the fix needed. The `atoms()` method in `sympy/core/basic.py` currently uses `isinstance(expr, Atom)` or `expr.is_Atom` to check for atomic expressions, but it should instead check `not expr.args` to identify leaf nodes in the expression tree.
-
-Based on the GitHub issue discussion, the fix is:
-1. Change the check from `isinstance(expr, Atom)` to `not expr.args` 
-2. Update the docstring accordingly
-3. Update the related test
-
-Let me create the patch based on this understanding:
-
---- a/sympy/core/basic.py
-+++ b/sympy/core/basic.py
-@@ -284,12 +284,12 @@ class Basic(with_metaclass(ManagedProperties)):
-     def atoms(self, *types):
-         """Returns the atoms that form the current object.
- 
--        By default, only objects that are truly atomic and can't
-+        By default, only objects that are truly atomic and cannot
-         be divided into smaller pieces are returned: symbols, numbers,
--        and number symbols like I and pi. It is possible to request
--        atoms of any type, however, as demonstrated below.
-+        and number symbols like ``I`` and ``pi``. It is possible to request
-+        atoms of any type, however.
- 
--        Examples
-+        **Examples**
-         ========
- 
-         >>> from sympy import I, pi, sin
-@@ -303,6 +303,14 @@ class Basic(with_metaclass(ManagedProperties)):
-         >>> (1 + x + 2*sin(y + I*pi)).atoms(Number)
-         {1, 2}
- 
-+        Note that a leaf is defined to be something that has no ``.args``, not
-+        just a class that is a subclass of ``Atom``. For example, ``Basic()``
-+        has no ``.args`` and is considered a leaf:
-+
-+        >>> Basic().atoms()
-+        {Basic()}
-+
-+        **Types**
-         >>> (1 + x + 2*sin(y + I*pi)).atoms(Number, NumberSymbol)
-         {1, 2, pi}
- 
-@@ -313,16 +321,21 @@ class Basic(with_metaclass(ManagedProperties)):
-         >>> (1 + x + 2*sin(y + I*pi)).atoms(Number, NumberSymbol, I)
-         {1, 2, I, pi}
- 
-+        Note that I is a Symbol, not a class:
-+
-+        >>> I.is_Symbol
-+        True
-+
-         Be careful to check your assumptions when using the implicit
-         assumption about what atoms are returned:
- 
-         >>> from sympy import S
-         >>> from sympy.core.function import AppliedUndef
-         >>> class example(Function):
--                is_real = True
-+        ...     is_real = True
-+        ...
-         >>> f = example(x)
--        >>> f.atoms(Symbol)
--        set()
-+        >>> f.atoms(Symbol) == set()
-         True
- 
-         However, one can always refine the search further:
-@@ -333,10 +346,9 @@ class Basic(with_metaclass(ManagedProperties)):
-         """
-         if types:
-             types = tuple(
-                 [t if isinstance(t, type) else type(t) for t in types])
--            result = set()
-         else:
-             types = (Atom,)
-         result = set()
-         for expr in preorder_traversal(self):
--            if isinstance(expr, types):
-+            if not expr.args or isinstance(expr, types):
-                 result.add(expr)
-         return result
-
-Wait, I need to reconsider this. Looking at the issue more carefully:
-
-The current code checks `isinstance(expr, Atom)` when no types are specified. The fix should change this to check `not expr.args` instead. Let me look at the exact structure again based on the discussion.
-
-The key insight from the discussion:
-- Current behavior: `atoms()` returns subclasses of `Atom`
-- Desired behavior: `atoms()` returns objects with no `.args` (true leaf nodes)
-
---- a/sympy/core/basic.py
-+++ b/sympy/core/basic.py
-@@ -284,12 +284,12 @@ class Basic(with_metaclass(ManagedProperties)):
-     def atoms(self, *types):
-         """Returns the atoms that form the current object.
- 
--        By default, only objects that are truly atomic and can't
-+        By default, only objects that are truly atomic and cannot
-         be divided into smaller pieces are returned: symbols, numbers,
--        and number symbols like I and pi. It is possible to request
--        atoms of any type, however, as demonstrated below.
-+        and number symbols like ``I`` and ``pi``. It is possible to request
-+        atoms of any type, however.
- 
--        Examples
-+        **Examples**
-         ========
- 
-         >>> from sympy import I, pi, sin
-@@ -340,10 +340,8 @@ class Basic(with_metaclass(ManagedProperties)):
-         if types:
-             types = tuple(
-                 [t if isinstance(t, type) else type(t) for t in types])
--        else:
--            types = (Atom,)
-         result = set()
-         for expr in preorder_traversal(self):
--            if isinstance(expr, types):
-+            if not types and not expr.args or types and isinstance(expr, types):
-                 result.add(expr)
-         return result
---- a/sympy/core/tests/test_basic.py
-+++ b/sympy/core/tests/test_basic.py
-@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ def test_atoms():
-     assert b21.atoms() == set()
- 
- def test_free_symbols_empty():
--    assert Basic().atoms() == set()
-+    assert Basic().atoms() == {Basic()}

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-18621.patch

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-The file doesn't exist in the current working directory. The user is asking me to generate a patch based on the issue description. Based on the hints provided in the issue, I can generate the patch directly.
-
-Let me produce the patch based on the information provided:
-
---- a/sympy/matrices/expressions/blockmatrix.py
-+++ b/sympy/matrices/expressions/blockmatrix.py
-@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ def blocks(self):
-         data = [[mats[i] if i == j else ZeroMatrix(mats[i].rows, mats[j].cols)
-                         for j in range(len(mats))]
-                         for i in range(len(mats))]
--        return ImmutableDenseMatrix(data)
-+        return ImmutableDenseMatrix(data, evaluate=False)
- 
-     @property
-     def shape(self):

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-18698.patch

@@ -1,105 +0,0 @@
-Based on the GitHub issue description and the discussion in the comments, I can understand the problem clearly:
-
-1. `sqf_list((x**2 + 1) * (x - 1)**2 * (x - 2)**3 * (x - 3)**3)` returns `(1, [(x**2 + 1, 1), (x - 1, 2), (x - 3, 3), (x - 2, 3)])`
-2. But it should combine factors with the same multiplicity: `(1, [(x**2 + 1, 1), (x - 1, 2), (x**2 - 5*x + 6, 3)])`
-3. The `Poly.sqf_list()` method works correctly
-
-The issue is in the `_symbolic_factor_list` function in `sympy/polys/polytools.py` - it needs to post-process the results to combine factors with the same multiplicity.
-
-Based on the discussion in the issue:
-- The problem is in the `_generic_factor_list` function which is called by `sqf_list`
-- The fix should combine factors with the same multiplicity before returning
-
-Let me create the patch based on the standard sympy code structure:
-
---- a/sympy/polys/polytools.py
-+++ b/sympy/polys/polytools.py
-@@ -6216,6 +6216,18 @@ def _symbolic_factor_list(expr, opt, method):
-         factors.append((_symbolic_factor(g), k))
- 
-     return coeff, factors
-+
-+
-+def _sorted_factors(factors, method):
-+    """Sort and combine factors with same multiplicity for sqf methods."""
-+    if method in ('sqf',):
-+        # Combine factors with the same multiplicity
-+        combined = {}
-+        for factor, k in factors:
-+            combined[k] = combined.get(k, S.One) * factor
-+        factors = [(f, k) for k, f in combined.items()]
-+        factors = sorted(factors, key=lambda x: x[1])
-+    return factors
- 
- 
- def _factor_list_syms(result, syms):
-@@ -6235,6 +6247,7 @@ def _generic_factor_list(expr, gens, args, method):
- 
-     try:
-         coeff, factors = _symbolic_factor_list(expr, opt, method)
-+        factors = _sorted_factors(factors, method)
-     except PolificationFailed:
-         return S.One, [(expr, 1)]
-
-Wait, I need to look more carefully at the actual code structure. Let me search for more information about how the sympy sqf_list function is structured based on the issue discussion:
-
-Looking at the issue discussion more carefully:
-- The key insight from @jksuom is: "it is necessary to post-process the result... the two threefold factors `x - 3` and `x - 2` should be combined to give a single `(x**2 - 5*x + 6, 3)`"
-- The function `_generic_factor_list` is at the core of the issue
-- The `Poly.sqf_list()` method works correctly
-
-The fix needs to be in the post-processing step of `_generic_factor_list` specifically for the 'sqf' method to combine factors with the same multiplicity.
-
---- a/sympy/polys/polytools.py
-+++ b/sympy/polys/polytools.py
-@@ -6213,7 +6213,19 @@ def _symbolic_factor_list(expr, opt, method):
-     for factor, k in factors:
-         if factor.is_Number:
-             coeff *= factor**k
-         else:
-             factors.append((_symbolic_factor(g), k))
- 
-     return coeff, factors
-+
-+
-+def _sorted_factors(factors, method):
-+    """Sort factors list and combine factors with same multiplicity for sqf."""
-+    if method == 'sqf':
-+        # Combine factors with the same multiplicity
-+        from collections import defaultdict
-+        combined = defaultdict(lambda: S.One)
-+        for factor, k in factors:
-+            combined[k] *= factor
-+        factors = sorted(combined.items(), key=lambda x: x[0])
-+        factors = [(f, k) for k, f in factors]
-+    return factors
-
-Based on my understanding of the issue and the sympy codebase structure, here is the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/polys/polytools.py
-+++ b/sympy/polys/polytools.py
-@@ -6213,6 +6213,17 @@ def _symbolic_factor_list(expr, opt, method):
- 
-     return coeff, factors
- 
-+
-+def _sorted_factors(factors, method):
-+    """Sort factors list and combine factors with same multiplicity for sqf."""
-+    if method == 'sqf':
-+        # Combine factors with the same multiplicity
-+        from collections import defaultdict
-+        combined = defaultdict(lambda: S.One)
-+        for factor, k in factors:
-+            combined[k] *= factor
-+        factors = [(combined[k], k) for k in sorted(combined.keys())]
-+    return factors
- 
- def _factor_list_syms(result, syms):
-     """Return a list of factors from a symbolic factorization."""
-@@ -6230,6 +6241,7 @@ def _generic_factor_list(expr, gens, args, method):
- 
-     try:
-         coeff, factors = _symbolic_factor_list(expr, opt, method)
-+        factors = _sorted_factors(factors, method)
-     except PolificationFailed:
-         return S.One, [(expr, 1)]

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-18835.patch

@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-Based on the GitHub issue, I can see this is about the `uniq` function in `sympy/utilities/iterables.py`. The issue mentions lines 2109-2124. Let me create a patch based on the problem description.
-
-The issue is that when iterating over `uniq(f)` and modifying the list `f` simultaneously, the output is silently wrong. The fix should check if the size of a mutable sequence changes during iteration and raise a `RuntimeError` similar to what Python does with dictionaries/sets.
-
-Based on the issue description and standard Python patterns for `uniq` functions, here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/utilities/iterables.py
-+++ b/sympy/utilities/iterables.py
-@@ -2106,6 +2106,7 @@ def uniq(seq, result=None):
-     >>> list(googol)
-     []
-     """
-+    initial_len = None
-     try:
-         seen = set()
-         result = result or []
-@@ -2113,6 +2114,12 @@ def uniq(seq, result=None):
-             if item not in seen:
-                 seen.add(item)
-                 result.append(item)
-+                if initial_len is None:
-+                    try:
-+                        initial_len = len(seq)
-+                    except TypeError:
-+                        pass
-+                if initial_len is not None and len(seq) != initial_len:
-+                    raise RuntimeError("dictionary changed size during iteration")
-                 yield item
-     except TypeError:
-         if item not in result:

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-19007.patch

@@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
---- a/sympy/matrices/expressions/blockmatrix.py
-+++ b/sympy/matrices/expressions/blockmatrix.py
-@@ -232,19 +232,33 @@ class BlockMatrix(BlockDiagMatrix):
- 
-     def _entry(self, i, j, **kwargs):
--        from sympy import floor
-+        from sympy.functions.elementary.piecewise import Piecewise
-+        from sympy.core.numbers import Integer
-+        from sympy.core.logic import fuzzy_not
-+
-+        # First, check if all block dimensions are concrete integers
-         rowblocksizes = self.rowblocksizes
-         colblocksizes = self.colblocksizes
- 
--        row_block = 0
--        col_block = 0
--        cumul_row = 0
--        cumul_col = 0
--        for i_sum in rowblocksizes:
--            if i < cumul_row + i_sum:
--                break
--            cumul_row += i_sum
--            row_block += 1
--        for j_sum in colblocksizes:
--            if j < cumul_col + j_sum:
--                break
--            cumul_col += j_sum
--            col_block += 1
-+        # Calculate cumulative offsets
-+        row_offset = 0
-+        for row_block, row_size in enumerate(rowblocksizes):
-+            # Check if i < row_offset + row_size is definitely true
-+            if (i - row_offset).is_nonnegative is False:
-+                # i < row_offset, went too far (shouldn't happen normally)
-+                from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
-+                return MatrixElement(self, i, j)
-+            if (i - row_offset - row_size).is_nonnegative is False:
-+                # i < row_offset + row_size, found the right block
-+                break
-+            elif (i - row_offset - row_size).is_nonnegative is None:
-+                # Can't determine, return unevaluated
-+                from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
-+                return MatrixElement(self, i, j)
-+            row_offset += row_size
-+        else:
-+            # Ran off the end
-+            from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
-+            return MatrixElement(self, i, j)
- 
--        return self.blocks[row_block, col_block][i - cumul_row, j - cumul_col]
-+        col_offset = 0
-+        for col_block, col_size in enumerate(colblocksizes):
-+            if (j - col_offset).is_nonnegative is False:
-+                from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
-+                return MatrixElement(self, i, j)
-+            if (j - col_offset - col_size).is_nonnegative is False:
-+                break
-+            elif (j - col_offset - col_size).is_nonnegative is None:
-+                from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
-+                return MatrixElement(self, i, j)
-+            col_offset += col_size
-+        else:
-+            from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
-+            return MatrixElement(self, i, j)
-+
-+        return self.blocks[row_block, col_block][i - row_offset, j - col_offset]

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-19254.patch

@@ -1,72 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the sympy codebase, I can provide the patch for replacing the Mignotte bound with the Knuth-Cohen bound. The Knuth-Cohen bound is a tighter bound that improves the efficiency of polynomial factorization.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/polys/factortools.py
-+++ b/sympy/polys/factortools.py
-@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ from sympy.polys.densebasic import (
-     dmp_degree_in,
-     dmp_to_dict,
-     dmp_from_dict,
--    dmp_ground_LC, dmp_ground_TC,
-+    dmp_ground_LC, dmp_ground_TC, dmp_max_norm,
-     dmp_ground_nth,
-     dmp_one, dmp_ground,
-     dmp_zeros)
-@@ -119,33 +119,38 @@ def dmp_trial_division(f, factors, u, K):
- 
- 
- def dup_zz_mignotte_bound(f, K):
--    """Mignotte bound for univariate polynomials in `K[x]`. """
--    a = dup_max_norm(f, K)
--    b = abs(dup_LC(f, K))
-+    """
-+    The Knuth-Cohen upper bound for the coefficients of a factor of a
-+    polynomial in `K[x]`.
-+
-+    This is used in polynomial factorization as a bound for the
-+    coefficients of factors.
-+
-+    References
-+    ==========
-+
-+    .. [1] Algorithm 15.4, p.423 of [Geddes1992]
-+
-+    """
-     n = dup_degree(f)
--    return K.sqrt(K(n + 1))*2**n*a*b
-+    return K.sqrt(K(2)**(2*n) * sum(c**2 for c in f))
- 
- 
- def dmp_zz_mignotte_bound(f, u, K):
--    """Mignotte bound for multivariate polynomials in `K[X]`. """
--    a = dmp_max_norm(f, u, K)
--    b = abs(dmp_ground_LC(f, u, K))
--    n = sum(dmp_degree_list(f, u))
--    return K.sqrt(K(n + 1))*2**n*a*b
-+    """
-+    The Knuth-Cohen upper bound for the coefficients of a factor of a
-+    polynomial in `K[X]`.
- 
-+    This is used in polynomial factorization as a bound for the
-+    coefficients of factors.
- 
--def dup_zz_hensel_step(m, f, g, h, s, t, K):
--    """
--    One step in Hensel lifting in `Z[x]`.
-+    References
-+    ==========
- 
--    Given positive integer `m` and `Z[x]` polynomials `f`, `g`, `h`, `s`
--    and `t` such that::
-+    .. [1] Algorithm 15.4, p.423 of [Geddes1992]
- 
--        f = g*h (mod m)
--        s*g + t*h = 1 (mod m)
--
--        lc(f) is not a zero divisor (mod m)
--        lc(h) = 1
-+    """
-+    a = dmp_max_norm(f, u, K)
-+    n = sum(dmp_degree_list(f, u))
-+    return K.sqrt(K(2)**(2*n) * (n + 1)) * a

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-19487.patch

@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the sympy codebase and the issue description, I can provide the patch to add the `_eval_rewrite_as_Abs` method to the `sign` class. The issue asks for `sign(x).rewrite(Abs)` to return a `Piecewise` expression that handles the zero case properly.
-
-Let me create the patch based on the standard sympy code structure:
-
---- a/sympy/functions/elementary/complexes.py
-+++ b/sympy/functions/elementary/complexes.py
-@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
- from sympy.core.logic import fuzzy_bool, fuzzy_not
- from sympy.core.mul import Mul
- from sympy.core.relational import Eq
-+from sympy.functions.elementary.piecewise import Piecewise
- 
- ###############################################################################
- ######################### REAL and IMAGINARY PARTS ############################
-@@ -391,6 +392,12 @@ def _eval_rewrite_as_Heaviside(self, arg, **kwargs):
-             return Heaviside(arg, H0=S(1)/2) * 2 - 1
-         return Heaviside(arg, H0=S.Half) - Heaviside(-arg, H0=S.Half)
- 
-+    def _eval_rewrite_as_Abs(self, arg, **kwargs):
-+        return Piecewise((0, Eq(arg, 0)), (arg / Abs(arg), True))
-+
-     def _eval_simplify(self, **kwargs):
-         return self.func(factor_terms(self.args[0]))  # XXX include doit?

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-20049.patch

@@ -1,125 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the SymPy codebase and the issue description, I can provide the patch. The issue is that `Point.vel()` should automatically calculate velocity from position information if velocity hasn't been explicitly defined, similar to how `ReferenceFrame.ang_vel_in()` works.
-
-The key insight from the issue:
-1. When you call `Q.set_pos(P, r)` to set position of Q relative to P as vector `r`
-2. Then `Q.vel(A)` should calculate velocity by taking the time derivative of `r` in frame A (i.e., `r.dt(A)`)
-3. This mirrors how `ang_vel_in()` calculates angular velocity from orientation
-
-Here's the patch that implements this fix:
-
---- a/sympy/physics/vector/point.py
-+++ b/sympy/physics/vector/point.py
-@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
- from __future__ import print_function, division
- from .vector import Vector, _check_vector
- from .frame import _check_frame
-+from warnings import warn
- 
- __all__ = ['Point']
- 
-@@ -515,9 +516,56 @@ class Point(object):
-         Examples
-         ========
- 
--        >>> from sympy.physics.vector import Point, ReferenceFrame
-+        >>> from sympy.physics.vector import Point, ReferenceFrame, dynamicsymbols
-         >>> N = ReferenceFrame('N')
-         >>> p1 = Point('p1')
--        >>> p1.set_vel(N, 10 * N.x)
-+        >>> p2 = Point('p2')
-+        >>> q = dynamicsymbols('q')
-+        >>> p1.set_vel(N, 10 * N.x)
-+        >>> p2.set_pos(p1, q * N.y)
-         >>> p1.vel(N)
-         10*N.x
-+        >>> p2.vel(N)
-+        q'*N.y
- 
-         """
- 
-         _check_frame(frame)
--        if not (frame in self._vel_dict):
--            raise ValueError('Velocity of point ' + self.name + ' has not been'
--                             ' defined in ReferenceFrame ' + frame.name)
--        return self._vel_dict[frame]
-+        if frame in self._vel_dict:
-+            return self._vel_dict[frame]
-+        else:
-+            # Try to calculate velocity from position information
-+            visited = set()
-+            queue = [self]
-+            while queue:
-+                node = queue.pop(0)
-+                if node in visited:
-+                    continue
-+                visited.add(node)
-+                # Check if node has velocity defined in frame
-+                if frame in node._vel_dict:
-+                    # Calculate velocity by going backwards through position tree
-+                    path = self._pdict_path(node)
-+                    if path is not None:
-+                        vel = node._vel_dict[frame]
-+                        for i in range(len(path) - 1, 0, -1):
-+                            # Get position of path[i-1] from path[i]
-+                            pos_vec = path[i-1].pos_from(path[i])
-+                            # Velocity contribution from this position vector
-+                            vel = vel + pos_vec.dt(frame)
-+                        return vel
-+                # Add neighbors (points with position defined relative to node)
-+                for other_point in node._pos_dict.keys():
-+                    if other_point not in visited:
-+                        queue.append(other_point)
-+            raise ValueError('Velocity of point ' + self.name + ' has not been'
-+                             ' defined in ReferenceFrame ' + frame.name)
-+
-+    def _pdict_path(self, other):
-+        """Returns a list of points that connect self to other.
-+
-+        The list will start with self and end with other.
-+        Returns None if no path exists.
-+        """
-+        # BFS to find path from self to other via _pos_dict
-+        from collections import deque
-+        queue = deque([(self, [self])])
-+        visited = {self}
-+        while queue:
-+            node, path = queue.popleft()
-+            if node == other:
-+                return path
-+            for neighbor in node._pos_dict.keys():
-+                if neighbor not in visited:
-+                    visited.add(neighbor)
-+                    queue.append((neighbor, path + [neighbor]))
-+        return None
-
-Wait, let me reconsider. Looking at the actual SymPy codebase structure more carefully based on the issue and hints, the fix should be simpler and follow the pattern used in `ang_vel_in()`. Let me provide a cleaner patch:
-
---- a/sympy/physics/vector/point.py
-+++ b/sympy/physics/vector/point.py
-@@ -519,8 +519,26 @@ class Point(object):
-         """
- 
-         _check_frame(frame)
--        if not (frame in self._vel_dict):
--            raise ValueError('Velocity of point ' + self.name + ' has not been'
--                             ' defined in ReferenceFrame ' + frame.name)
--        return self._vel_dict[frame]
-+        if frame in self._vel_dict:
-+            return self._vel_dict[frame]
-+        else:
-+            # Try to calculate velocity from position information
-+            # by finding a point with known velocity and using the
-+            # time derivative of the position vector
-+            visited = []
-+            queue = [self]
-+            while queue:
-+                node = queue.pop(0)
-+                if node not in visited:
-+                    visited.append(node)
-+                    if frame in node._vel_dict:
-+                        return node._vel_dict[frame] + self.pos_from(node).dt(frame)
-+                    for neighbor in node._pos_dict:
-+                        if neighbor not in visited:
-+                            queue.append(neighbor)
-+            raise ValueError('Velocity of point ' + self.name + ' has not been'
-+                             ' defined in ReferenceFrame ' + frame.name)

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-20154.patch

@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the SymPy codebase and the issue described, I need to create a patch for the `partitions()` function in `sympy/utilities/iterables.py`. The function reuses the same dictionary object and yields it on each iteration, which causes bugs when users try to collect results (e.g., `list(partitions(n))`).
-
-The fix is to yield a copy of the dictionary instead of the dictionary itself. Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/utilities/iterables.py
-+++ b/sympy/utilities/iterables.py
-@@ -1738,28 +1738,6 @@ def partitions(n, m=None, k=None, size=False):
- 
-     {2: 1, 1: 2}
-     {1: 4}
--
--    Note that the _same_ dictionary object is returned each time.
--    This is for speed:  generating each partition goes quickly,
--    taking constant time, independent of n.
--
--    >>> [p for p in partitions(6, k=2)]
--    [{1: 6}, {1: 6}, {1: 6}, {1: 6}]
--
--    If you want to build a list of the returned dictionaries then
--    make a copy of them:
--
--    >>> [p.copy() for p in partitions(6, k=2)]  # doctest: +SKIP
--    [{2: 3}, {1: 2, 2: 2}, {1: 4, 2: 1}, {1: 6}]
--    >>> [(M, p.copy()) for M, p in partitions(6, k=2, size=True)]  # doctest: +SKIP
--    [(3, {2: 3}), (4, {1: 2, 2: 2}), (5, {1: 4, 2: 1}), (6, {1: 6})]
--
--    Reference:
--    Modified from Tim Peter's version to allow for k and m values:
--    http://code.activestate.com/recipes/218332-generator-for-integer-partitions/
--
--    See Also
-     ========
-     sympy.combinatorics.partitions.Partition
-     sympy.combinatorics.partitions.IntegerPartition
-@@ -1793,9 +1771,9 @@ def partitions(n, m=None, k=None, size=False):
-     keys.append(r)
-     while keys:
-         if size:
--            yield sum(ms.values()), ms
-+            yield sum(ms.values()), ms.copy()
-         else:
--            yield ms
-+            yield ms.copy()
- 
-         # Reuse any 1's.
-         if keys[-1] == 1:

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-20212.patch

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the sympy codebase, I can create the patch. In sympy 1.5.x, the issue is in `sympy/core/power.py` where the `Pow.__new__` method handles special cases. The code incorrectly returns `S.Zero` for `0**-oo` when it should return `S.ComplexInfinity` (zoo).
-
-Looking at the sympy 1.5 source code structure, the relevant section is in the `Pow.__new__` method where it handles the case when `b is S.Zero`. The current code checks for negative exponents but doesn't properly handle the case of `-oo`.
-
-Here is the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/core/power.py
-+++ b/sympy/core/power.py
-@@ -264,6 +264,8 @@ class Pow(Expr):
-                     return S.ComplexInfinity
-                 if e.is_Rational and e.is_negative:
-                     return S.ComplexInfinity
-+                if e is S.NegativeInfinity:
-+                    return S.ComplexInfinity
-             if e.is_positive:
-                 return S.Zero
-             if e.is_negative:

package/.agent/skills/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-20322.patch

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description and the suggested fix from the GitHub discussion, I have enough information to create the patch. The solution is to modify the `fraction` function in `sympy/simplify/radsimp.py` to recurse into nested Mul expressions.
-
-The fix adds a helper function `mul_args` that recursively yields arguments from nested Mul expressions, which allows `fraction` to correctly handle unevaluated nested Mul expressions like `Mul(-1, Mul(1, Pow(2, -1, evaluate=False), evaluate=False), evaluate=False)`.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/simplify/radsimp.py
-+++ b/sympy/simplify/radsimp.py
-@@ -1071,7 +1071,14 @@ def fraction(expr, exact=False):
- 
-     numer, denom = [], []
- 
--    for term in Mul.make_args(expr):
-+    def mul_args(e):
-+        for term in Mul.make_args(e):
-+            if term.is_Mul:
-+                yield from mul_args(term)
-+            else:
-+                yield term
-+
-+    for term in mul_args(expr):
-         if term.is_commutative and (term.is_Pow or isinstance(term, exp)):
-             b, ex = term.as_base_exp()
-             if ex.is_negative: