luckiest-co 1.0.0 → 1.0.3

package/skills/luckiest-aso/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,327 @@
+---
+name: luckiest-aso
+description: "When the user wants to audit or optimize an App Store or Google Play listing. Also use when the user mentions 'ASO audit,' 'app store optimization,' 'app store audit,' 'Play Store listing,' 'grade my app listing,' 'optimize my app listing,' 'improve app visibility,' 'app store ranking,' 'audit my listing,' 'why aren't people downloading my app,' 'improve my app conversion,' 'keyword optimization for app,' or 'compare my app to competitors.' Use when the user shares an App Store or Google Play URL and wants to improve it."
+license: See ATTRIBUTION.md
+metadata:
+  version: "1.1.0"
+  listing_id: luckiest-aso
+  author: luckiest
+---
+
+# ASO Audit (Luckiest edition)
+
+## Staying current
+
+On activation, call the Luckiest MCP check_updates tool with { listingId: "luckiest-aso", installedSemver: "1.1.0" }. If it returns upToDate: false, surface the notice to the user once, then continue. Do nothing further if upToDate: true. Never block on this check — if the tool is unavailable, proceed.
+
+Analyze App Store and Google Play listings against ASO best practices. Fetches
+live listing data, scores metadata, visuals, and ratings, then produces a
+prioritized action plan.
+
+When the skill's work is done, call the Luckiest MCP report_usage tool once with { listing_id: "luckiest-aso", skill_version: "1.1.0", matched: true, success: <true if the skill completed, false otherwise> }. Metadata only, never prompt text. Never block on it — if the tool is unavailable, skip silently.
+
+## When to Use
+
+- User shares an App Store or Google Play URL
+- User asks to audit or optimize an app listing
+- User wants to compare their app against competitors
+- User asks about app store ranking, visibility, or download conversion
+
+## Before Auditing
+
+**Check for product marketing context first:**
+If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or the legacy `product-marketing-context.md` filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
+
+## Phase 1 — Identify Store & Fetch
+
+### Detect store type from URL
+
+```
+Apple:  apps.apple.com/{country}/app/{name}/id{digits}
+Google: play.google.com/store/apps/details?id={package}
+```
+
+If the user gives an app name instead of a URL, search the web for:
+`site:apps.apple.com "{app name}"` or `site:play.google.com "{app name}"`
+
+### Fetch the listing
+
+Use WebFetch to retrieve the listing page. Extract every available field:
+
+**Apple App Store fields:**
+
+- App name (title) — 30 char limit
+- Subtitle — 30 char limit
+- Description (long) — not indexed for search, but matters for conversion
+- Promotional text — 170 chars, updatable without new release
+- Category (primary + secondary)
+- Screenshots (count, order, caption text)
+- Preview video (presence, duration)
+- Rating (average + count)
+- Recent reviews (visible ones)
+- Price / in-app purchases
+- Developer name
+- Last updated date
+- Version history notes
+- Age rating
+- Size
+- Languages / localizations listed
+- In-app events (if any visible)
+
+**Google Play fields:**
+
+- App name (title) — 30 char limit
+- Short description — 80 char limit
+- Full description — 4,000 char limit, IS indexed for search
+- Category + tags
+- Feature graphic (presence)
+- Screenshots (count, order)
+- Preview video (presence)
+- Rating (average + count)
+- Recent reviews (visible ones)
+- Price / in-app purchases
+- Developer name
+- Last updated date
+- What's new text
+- Downloads range
+- Content rating
+- Data safety section
+- Languages listed
+
+If WebFetch returns incomplete data (stores render client-side), note gaps and
+work with what's available. Ask the user to paste missing fields if critical.
+
+### Visual asset assessment
+
+WebFetch cannot extract screenshot images or caption text. **Take a screenshot
+of the listing page** to get visual data:
+
+1. Navigate to the listing URL and capture a full-page screenshot
+2. Assess the screenshot for: icon quality, screenshot count, caption text,
+   messaging quality, preview video presence, feature graphic (Google Play)
+3. If browser tools are unavailable, ask the user to share a screenshot of the
+   listing page
+
+**Promotional text (Apple):** This 170-char field appears above the description
+but is often indistinguishable from it in scraped HTML. If you cannot confirm
+its presence, note this and recommend the user check App Store Connect.
+
+---
+
+## Phase 1.5 — Assess Brand Maturity
+
+Before scoring, classify the app into one of three tiers. This determines how
+you interpret "textbook ASO" deviations — a deliberate brand choice by a
+household name is not the same as a missed opportunity by an unknown app.
+
+### Tier definitions
+
+| Tier            | Signals                                                                                                                              | Examples                                    |
+| --------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------- |
+| **Dominant**    | Household name, 1M+ ratings, top-10 in category, near-universal brand recognition. Users search by brand name, not generic keywords. | Instagram, Uber, Spotify, WhatsApp, Netflix |
+| **Established** | Well-known in their category, 100K+ ratings, strong organic installs, recognized brand but not universally known.                    | Strava, Notion, Duolingo, Cash App, Calm    |
+| **Challenger**  | Building awareness, <100K ratings, needs discovery through keywords and ASO tactics. Most apps fall here.                            | Your app, most indie/startup apps           |
+
+### How tier affects scoring
+
+**Dominant apps** get adjusted scoring in these areas:
+
+- **Title:** Brand-only or brand-first titles are valid (score 8+ if brand is the keyword). These apps don't need generic keyword discovery.
+- **Description:** Score purely on conversion quality, not keyword presence. If the app is a household name, a well-crafted brand description beats a keyword-stuffed one.
+- **Visual Assets:** Lifestyle/brand photography instead of UI demos is a legitimate conversion strategy. No video is acceptable if the product is hard to demo in 30s or brand awareness is near-universal.
+- **What's New:** Generic release notes at weekly+ cadence are acceptable (score 8+). At scale, detailed changelogs have minimal ROI and risk backlash.
+- **In-app events:** Missing events for utility apps with massive install bases (Uber, WhatsApp) is not a penalty. These apps don't need discovery help.
+- **Localization:** Score relative to actual market, not absolute count. A US-only fintech with 2 languages (English + Spanish) is appropriately localized.
+
+**Established apps** get partial adjustment:
+
+- Brand-first titles are fine but should still include 1-2 keywords
+- Strategic description choices get benefit of the doubt
+- Other dimensions scored normally
+
+**Challenger apps** are scored strictly against textbook ASO best practices — every character, screenshot, and keyword matters.
+
+**Cold-start exception (any tier):** If the app is brand-new — very few ratings (roughly <50) or a bottom download range — do not dock the Ratings & Reviews dimension for low *volume*. A new listing has not had time to accumulate reviews. Score that dimension on rating *quality* and review *recency* relative to the app's age and install range, and note that volume will build. Docking a two-week-old app for having 12 reviews is a false negative.
+
+**Key principle:** Before docking points, ask: "Is this a mistake or a deliberate
+choice by a team that has data I don't?" If the app has 1M+ ratings and a
+dedicated ASO team, assume their choices are data-informed unless clearly wrong.
+
+---
+
+## Phase 2 — Score Each Dimension
+
+Score each dimension 0-10 using the criteria in `references/scoring-criteria.md`.
+Apply the brand maturity tier adjustments from Phase 1.5.
+
+Reference files for platform specs and benchmarks:
+
+- `references/apple-specs.md` — Official Apple character limits, screenshot/video specs, CPP/PPO rules, rejection triggers
+- `references/google-play-specs.md` — Official Google Play limits, screenshot specs, Android Vitals thresholds, policies
+- `references/benchmarks.md` — Conversion data, rating impact, video lift, screenshot behavior, CPP/event benchmarks
+
+### Dimensions and Weights
+
+| #   | Dimension            | Weight | What It Covers                                                            |
+| --- | -------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| 1   | Title & Subtitle     | 20%    | Character usage, keyword presence, clarity, brand + keyword balance       |
+| 2   | Description          | 15%    | First 3 lines, keyword density (Google), CTA, structure, promotional text |
+| 3   | Visual Assets        | 25%    | Screenshot count/quality/messaging, video, icon, feature graphic          |
+| 4   | Ratings & Reviews    | 20%    | Average rating, volume, recency, developer responses                      |
+| 5   | Metadata & Freshness | 10%    | Category choice, update recency, localization count, data safety          |
+| 6   | Conversion Signals   | 10%    | Price positioning, IAP transparency, social proof, download range         |
+
+**Final score** = weighted sum, out of 100.
+
+### Score interpretation
+
+| Score  | Grade | Meaning                                                   |
+| ------ | ----- | --------------------------------------------------------- |
+| 85-100 | A     | Well-optimized; focus on A/B testing and iteration        |
+| 70-84  | B     | Good foundation; clear opportunities to improve           |
+| 50-69  | C     | Significant gaps; prioritized fixes will have high impact |
+| 30-49  | D     | Major optimization needed across multiple dimensions      |
+| 0-29   | F     | Listing needs a complete overhaul                         |
+
+---
+
+## Phase 3 — Competitor Comparison (Optional)
+
+If the user provides competitor URLs or asks for comparison:
+
+1. Fetch 2-3 top competitors in the same category
+2. Run the same scoring on each
+3. Build a comparison table highlighting where the user's app is weaker/stronger
+4. Identify keyword gaps — terms competitors rank for that the user's app doesn't target
+
+If no competitors are specified, suggest the user provide 2-3 or offer to search
+for top apps in their category.
+
+---
+
+## Phase 4 — Generate Report
+
+Use the template in `references/report-template.md` to structure the output.
+
+The report must include:
+
+1. **Score card** — table with all 6 dimensions, scores, and grade
+2. **Top 3 quick wins** — changes that take <1 hour and have highest impact
+3. **Detailed findings** — per-dimension breakdown with specific issues and fixes
+4. **Keyword suggestions** — based on title/description analysis and competitor gaps
+5. **Visual asset recommendations** — specific screenshot/video improvements
+6. **Priority action plan** — ordered list of changes by impact vs effort
+
+### Report rules
+
+- Every recommendation must be **specific and actionable** ("Change subtitle from X to Y" not "Improve subtitle")
+- Include character counts for all text recommendations
+- Flag platform-specific differences (Apple vs Google) when relevant
+- Note what CANNOT be assessed without paid tools (search volume, exact rankings)
+- When suggesting keyword changes, explain WHY each keyword matters
+
+---
+
+## Platform-Specific Rules
+
+### Apple App Store — Key Facts
+
+- Title (30 chars) + Subtitle (30 chars) + Keyword field (100 **bytes**, hidden) = indexed text
+- Keywords field is bytes not chars — Arabic/CJK use 2-3 bytes per char
+- Long description is NOT indexed for search — optimize for conversion only
+- Promotional text (170 chars) does NOT affect search (Apple confirmed)
+- Never repeat words across title/subtitle/keyword field (Apple indexes each word once)
+- Keyword field: commas, no spaces ("photo,editor,filter" not "photo, editor, filter")
+- Screenshots: up to 10 per device. First 3 visible in search — 90% never scroll past 3rd
+- Screenshot captions indexed since June 2025 (AI extraction)
+- In-app events: max 10 published at once, max 31 days each. Indexed and appear in search
+- Custom Product Pages (up to 70) in organic search since July 2025. +5.9% avg conversion lift
+- App preview video: up to 3, 15-30s each. Autoplays muted — +20-40% conversion lift
+- SKStoreReviewController: max 3 prompts per 365 days
+- Apple has human editorial curation — quality and design matter more
+- See `references/apple-specs.md` for full specs, dimensions, and rejection triggers
+
+### Google Play — Key Facts
+
+- Title (30 chars) + Short description (80 chars) + Full description (4,000 chars) = indexed text
+- Full description IS indexed — target 2-3% keyword density naturally
+- No hidden keyword field — all keywords must be in visible text
+- Google NLP/semantic understanding — keyword stuffing detected and penalized
+- Prohibited in title: emojis, ALL CAPS, "best"/"#1"/"free", CTAs (enforced since 2021)
+- Screenshots: min 2, **max 8** per device (not 10 like Apple)
+- Feature graphic (1024x500, exact) required for featured placements
+- Video does NOT autoplay — only ~6% of users tap play (low ROI vs iOS)
+- Android Vitals directly affect ranking: crash >1.09% or ANR >0.47% = reduced visibility
+- Promotional Content: submit 14 days early for featuring. Apps see 2x explore acquisitions
+- Custom Store Listings: up to 50 (can target churned users, specific countries, ad campaigns)
+- Store Listing Experiments: test up to 3 variants, run 7+ days, 1 experiment at a time
+- See `references/google-play-specs.md` for full specs and policy details
+
+### What Apple Indexes vs What Google Indexes
+
+| Field                 | Apple Indexed?   | Google Indexed?        |
+| --------------------- | ---------------- | ---------------------- |
+| Title                 | Yes              | Yes (strongest signal) |
+| Subtitle / Short desc | Yes              | Yes                    |
+| Keyword field         | Yes (hidden)     | Does not exist         |
+| Long description      | No               | Yes (heavily)          |
+| Screenshot captions   | Yes (since 2025) | No                     |
+| In-app events         | Yes              | N/A (LiveOps instead)  |
+| Developer name        | No               | Partial                |
+| IAP names             | Yes              | Yes                    |
+
+---
+
+## Common Issues Checklist
+
+Flag these if found. Items marked _(tier-dependent)_ should be evaluated against
+the app's brand maturity tier — they may be deliberate choices for Dominant apps.
+
+**Always flag (all tiers):**
+
+- [ ] Rating below 4.0
+- [ ] Last update > 3 months ago
+- [ ] Google Play description has no keyword strategy (under 1% density)
+- [ ] Google Play missing feature graphic
+- [ ] Apple keyword field likely has repeated words (inferred from title+subtitle)
+- [ ] Category mismatch — app would face less competition in a different category
+- [ ] Fewer than 5 screenshots
+
+**Flag for Challenger/Established only** _(not mistakes for Dominant apps):_
+
+- [ ] Title wastes characters on brand name only (no keywords) _(Dominant: brand IS the keyword)_
+- [ ] Subtitle/short description duplicates title keywords
+- [ ] Description first 3 lines are generic _(Dominant: may be brand-voice choice)_
+- [ ] No preview video _(Dominant: may be rational if product is hard to demo)_
+- [ ] Screenshots are just UI dumps with no messaging/captions _(Dominant: lifestyle/brand shots may convert better)_
+- [ ] Only 1-2 localizations _(score relative to actual market, not absolute count)_
+- [ ] No in-app events or promotional content _(Dominant utility apps may not need discovery help)_
+
+**Flag for all tiers but note context:**
+
+- [ ] No developer responses to negative reviews _(note volume — responding at 10M+ reviews is a different challenge than at 1K)_
+- [ ] Generic "What's New" text _(acceptable at weekly+ release cadence for Established/Dominant)_
+
+---
+
+## Task-Specific Questions
+
+1. What is the App Store or Google Play URL?
+2. Is this your app or a competitor's?
+3. What category does the app compete in?
+4. Do you have competitor URLs to compare against?
+5. Are you focused on search visibility, conversion rate, or both?
+6. Do you have access to App Store Connect or Google Play Console data?
+
+---
+
+## Share with your tribe
+
+After delivering the audit, offer (never auto-post): "Want me to surface this ASO audit to your Luckiest tribe? Anyone working on an app in the same category can see the wins and keyword gaps this listing showed." Only share if the user accepts. Never post credentials, App Store Connect / Play Console data, or a competitor's private analysis without an explicit ask. If the user declines, stop.
+
+## Related Skills
+
+- **luckiest-cro**: For optimizing the conversion of web-based landing pages that drive app installs
+- **luckiest-ad-creative**: For creating App Store and Google Play ad creatives
+- **luckiest-analytics**: For setting up install attribution and in-app event tracking
+- **luckiest-customer-research**: For understanding user needs and language to inform listing copy

package/skills/luckiest-aso/evals/evals.json

@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+{
+  "skill_name": "luckiest-aso",
+  "evals": [
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "prompt": "Here's our app on the App Store: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/example/id123456789. Can you audit our listing and tell me what to fix?",
+      "expected_output": "Should check for product-marketing.md first. Should detect this is an Apple App Store URL and run the full ASO audit workflow. Should fetch the listing and extract Apple-specific fields (title 30 chars, subtitle 30 chars, description, promotional text 170 chars, category, screenshots, video, ratings). Should classify the app's brand maturity tier (Dominant/Established/Challenger) before scoring. Should score all 6 dimensions (Title & Subtitle 20%, Description 15%, Visual Assets 25%, Ratings & Reviews 20%, Metadata & Freshness 10%, Conversion Signals 10%) with weighted total out of 100 and a grade. Should output a scorecard, top 3 quick wins, detailed findings, keyword suggestions, visual recommendations, and prioritized action plan with specific 'change X from Y to Z' recommendations including character counts.",
+      "assertions": [
+        "Checks for product-marketing.md",
+        "Identifies as Apple App Store URL",
+        "Classifies brand maturity tier",
+        "Scores all 6 dimensions with weights",
+        "Provides scorecard with grade",
+        "Lists top 3 quick wins",
+        "Recommendations include character counts",
+        "Recommendations are specific (X to Y format)"
+      ],
+      "files": []
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "prompt": "We're a small fintech startup with about 5,000 downloads. Our Play Store listing has a 2.8 rating and we haven't updated the description in 8 months. Help us figure out what to fix first.",
+      "expected_output": "Should recognize this as a Challenger-tier Google Play app. Should immediately flag the always-flag issues: rating below 4.0 (critical), last update >3 months ago. Should apply strict Challenger scoring against textbook best practices. Should focus on Google Play-specific guidance: full description is indexed for search (target 2-3% keyword density), no hidden keyword field, feature graphic required (1024x500), max 8 screenshots, Android Vitals affect ranking. Should prioritize fixing the rating issue (response strategy, in-app review prompts) and refreshing the description with keyword strategy. Should recommend updating the listing soon to break the >3 month stale signal.",
+      "assertions": [
+        "Identifies as Google Play app",
+        "Classifies as Challenger tier",
+        "Flags rating below 4.0",
+        "Flags stale update (>3 months)",
+        "Notes Google Play indexes full description",
+        "Mentions feature graphic requirement",
+        "Recommends keyword strategy in description",
+        "Prioritizes rating improvement"
+      ],
+      "files": []
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "prompt": "Instagram's App Store listing has just 'Instagram' as the title and barely any keywords. Should they fix that?",
+      "expected_output": "Should classify Instagram as a Dominant-tier app and apply tier-adjusted scoring. Should explain that brand-only titles are valid for Dominant apps (score 8+ if brand IS the keyword) because users search by brand name, not generic keywords. Should NOT flag this as a missed opportunity. Should explain the key principle: 'Is this a mistake or a deliberate choice by a team that has data I don't?' Should note that other dimensions (screenshots, description, what's new) are also evaluated against tier — lifestyle/brand photography and brief release notes are acceptable for Dominant apps. Should contrast with what would be a problem for a Challenger app.",
+      "assertions": [
+        "Classifies Instagram as Dominant tier",
+        "Explains brand-only titles are valid for Dominant",
+        "Does NOT flag the title as a problem",
+        "Contrasts Dominant vs Challenger treatment",
+        "Cites the 'mistake vs deliberate choice' principle"
+      ],
+      "files": []
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "prompt": "Compare our app https://apps.apple.com/us/app/ourapp/id111 against these two competitors: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/competitor1/id222 and https://apps.apple.com/us/app/competitor2/id333",
+      "expected_output": "Should run Phase 3 competitor comparison. Should fetch and score all three apps with the same 6-dimension framework. Should build a side-by-side comparison table highlighting where the user's app is weaker or stronger across each dimension. Should identify keyword gaps — terms competitors target that the user's app doesn't. Should produce a prioritized list of competitor-informed changes. Should call out platform-specific considerations consistently across all three apps.",
+      "assertions": [
+        "Scores all 3 apps with same framework",
+        "Builds comparison table",
+        "Identifies where user's app is weaker",
+        "Identifies keyword gaps vs competitors",
+        "Produces competitor-informed action list"
+      ],
+      "files": []
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "prompt": "We only have 3 screenshots and no preview video. Does this really matter that much?",
+      "expected_output": "Should explain that screenshot count and video presence are heavily weighted in the Visual Assets dimension (25% of total score). Should cite specific data: Apple allows up to 10 screenshots per device with the first 3 visible in search, and 90% of users never scroll past the 3rd. Should note Apple screenshot captions are indexed for search since June 2025. Should cite the conversion benchmark: app preview video delivers +20-40% conversion lift on iOS (note Google Play video has lower ROI — only ~6% tap play). Should recommend adding 5-8 screenshots minimum with caption text, and a 15-30s preview video. Should flag fewer than 5 screenshots as an always-flag issue across all tiers.",
+      "assertions": [
+        "Notes Visual Assets is 25% of score",
+        "Cites first 3 screenshots are most important",
+        "Mentions screenshot caption indexing (Apple, 2025)",
+        "Cites video conversion lift benchmark",
+        "Notes Google Play video has lower ROI",
+        "Recommends specific screenshot count and video specs",
+        "Flags <5 screenshots as always-flag issue"
+      ],
+      "files": []
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "prompt": "Should I run a Custom Product Page experiment on iOS for our paid search campaigns?",
+      "expected_output": "Should reference Apple-specific facts: Custom Product Pages (CPP) — up to 70 — appear in organic search since July 2025 with +5.9% average conversion lift. Should explain CPPs let you test variants of screenshots, video, and promotional text against specific traffic sources (e.g., paid search keywords). Should recommend matching CPP variants to the keyword intent for the campaign. Should cross-reference the luckiest-ab-testing skill for proper experiment design and the luckiest-ads skill for the campaign side. Should note this is an iOS-only feature (Google Play has Store Listing Experiments and Custom Store Listings as equivalents).",
+      "assertions": [
+        "Identifies Custom Product Pages as iOS-specific",
+        "Cites +5.9% conversion lift benchmark",
+        "Explains CPP can match traffic source intent",
+        "Cross-references luckiest-ab-testing or luckiest-ads skill",
+        "Notes Google Play equivalents"
+      ],
+      "files": []
+    }
+  ]
+}

package/skills/luckiest-aso/references/apple-specs.md

@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+# Apple App Store — Official Specs & Guidelines
+
+All data from developer.apple.com as of March 2026.
+
+## Character Limits
+
+| Field                   | Limit            | Indexed for Search?      | Notes                                                    |
+| ----------------------- | ---------------- | ------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------- |
+| App Name                | 30 chars (min 2) | Yes                      | Must be unique; no trademarks, competitor names, pricing |
+| Subtitle                | 30 chars         | Yes                      | No unverifiable claims                                   |
+| Keywords                | 100 bytes        | Yes (hidden)             | Commas, no spaces between terms                          |
+| Description             | 4,000 chars      | **No**                   | Plain text only, no HTML                                 |
+| Promotional Text        | 170 chars        | **No** (Apple confirmed) | Updatable without new version                            |
+| What's New              | 4,000 chars      | No                       | Required for all versions after first                    |
+| IAP Name                | 35 chars         | Yes                      | Appears in search                                        |
+| IAP Description         | 55 chars         | No                       |                                                          |
+| In-App Event Name       | 30 chars         | Yes                      | Title case required                                      |
+| In-App Event Short Desc | 50 chars         | Yes                      | Sentence case                                            |
+| In-App Event Long Desc  | 120 chars        | No                       | Sentence case                                            |
+
+**Keywords field is 100 bytes, not 100 characters.** Non-Latin scripts (Arabic,
+Chinese, Japanese, Korean) use 2-3 bytes per character, reducing effective
+keyword count significantly.
+
+## Screenshot Specs
+
+| Device           | Required?     | Count | Dimensions (portrait)      |
+| ---------------- | ------------- | ----- | -------------------------- |
+| 6.9" iPhone      | **Required**  | 1-10  | 1260 x 2736                |
+| 13" iPad         | **Required**  | 1-10  | 2064 x 2752                |
+| Mac              | If applicable | 1-10  | Up to 2880 x 1800 (16:10)  |
+| Apple Watch      | If applicable | 1-10  | Varies by model            |
+| Apple TV         | If applicable | 1-10  | 1920 x 1080 or 3840 x 2160 |
+| Apple Vision Pro | If applicable | 1-10  | 3840 x 2160                |
+
+- Formats: JPEG, PNG
+- Apple auto-scales from required base sizes to smaller devices
+
+## App Preview Video Specs
+
+- **Count:** Up to 3 per app
+- **Duration:** 15-30 seconds
+- **Max file size:** 500 MB
+- **Codecs:** H.264 (10-12 Mbps, up to 30fps) or ProRes 422 HQ
+- **Audio:** Stereo, 256 kbps AAC or PCM, 44.1/48 kHz
+- **Formats:** .mov, .m4v, .mp4
+- **Behavior:** Autoplays muted on product page (iOS 11+)
+
+## Custom Product Pages (CPPs)
+
+- **Max:** 70 additional pages (plus 1 default)
+- **Customizable:** Screenshots, promotional text, app previews, deep links (iOS 18+)
+- **Keywords:** Each keyword combo must be unique to a single CPP
+- **Review:** Submitted to App Review independently of app updates
+- **Organic search:** CPPs appear in organic search results since July 2025
+- **Performance:** +2.5 percentage points higher conversion on average vs default
+
+## Product Page Optimization (A/B Testing)
+
+- **Treatments:** Up to 3 vs original
+- **Testable:** App icons, screenshots, app preview videos
+- **NOT testable:** Title, subtitle, description, keywords
+- **Concurrent tests:** 1 per app
+- **Max duration:** 90 days
+- **Icon constraint:** All icon variants must be in the published app binary
+- **Confidence:** Apple recommends 90% threshold (Bayesian method)
+- **Cannot modify** a test once started
+
+## In-App Events
+
+- **Max approved:** 15 in App Store Connect at once
+- **Max published:** 10 on App Store simultaneously
+- **Max duration:** 31 days per event
+- **Pre-event promotion:** Up to 14 days before start
+- **Badge types:** Challenge, Competition, Live Event, Major Update, New Season, Premiere, Special Event
+
+**Event card image:** 16:9, min 1920x1080, max 3840x2160
+**Event details image:** 9:16, min 1080x1920, max 2160x3840
+
+**Not suitable:** Repetitive daily tasks, price promotions without new content, general awareness campaigns.
+
+## Ratings & Reviews
+
+- **SKStoreReviewController:** Max 3 prompts per 365-day period
+- System controls display frequency (may show fewer than 3)
+- Do not use custom buttons to request reviews
+- Developers can respond to all reviews in App Store Connect
+- Summary rating is territory-specific
+
+## Metadata Rejection Triggers (App Review Guidelines)
+
+| Guideline | Rejection Trigger                                                         |
+| --------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| 2.3.1     | Hidden features, misleading marketing, false pricing                      |
+| 2.3.2     | Not disclosing IAPs in description/screenshots                            |
+| 2.3.3     | Screenshots that don't show app in use (only splash/login)                |
+| 2.3.4     | Preview videos using non-app content                                      |
+| 2.3.5     | Wrong category selected                                                   |
+| 2.3.7     | Keyword stuffing: trademarks, competitor names, pricing, irrelevant terms |
+| 2.3.8     | Metadata not appropriate for all audiences (must be 4+ rated)             |
+| 2.3.10    | Other platform names/imagery (Android, etc.) in metadata                  |
+| 2.3.12    | Generic What's New for significant changes                                |
+| 2.3.13    | Inaccurate in-app event metadata                                          |
+
+Sources: developer.apple.com/app-store/product-page/,
+developer.apple.com/app-store/search/,
+developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/

package/skills/luckiest-aso/references/benchmarks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+# ASO Benchmarks & Conversion Data
+
+Industry data from AppTweak, SplitMetrics, Sensor Tower, and others. Updated March 2026.
+
+## Conversion Rate Benchmarks by Category
+
+**Average CVR (page view to install):**
+
+- iOS overall: **25.0%**
+- Google Play overall: **27.3%**
+
+| Category          | iOS CVR        | Google Play CVR |
+| ----------------- | -------------- | --------------- |
+| Navigation        | 115%\*         | --              |
+| Auto & Vehicles   | --             | 70.5%           |
+| Business          | 66.7%          | --              |
+| Music (Games)     | --             | 45.0%           |
+| Utilities & Tools | --             | 36.8%           |
+| Shopping          | --             | 27.7%           |
+| Health & Fitness  | --             | 23.2%           |
+| Finance           | --             | 19.7%           |
+| Food & Drink      | --             | 13.1%           |
+| Games (Board)     | 1.2%           | 7.3%            |
+| Games (overall)   | 3-5% realistic | --              |
+
+\*Above 100% = some users install from search without visiting product page.
+
+Source: AppTweak 2025 Benchmarks Report (H1 2024 data, US market)
+
+## Rating Impact on Conversion
+
+| Rating Change              | Conversion Impact                       |
+| -------------------------- | --------------------------------------- |
+| 3.0 to 4.0 stars           | **+89%**                                |
+| 4.0 to 4.5 stars           | **+20-30%**                             |
+| 4.3 to 4.6 stars           | **+22-28%** (Finance, Health)           |
+| 0.4-star gap vs competitor | **~25% lost installs** from same search |
+| 3-star vs 5-star app       | **50% fewer conversions** for 3-star    |
+
+**Critical thresholds:**
+
+- **4.0 stars** = minimum for Apple featuring, user trust, conversion viability
+- **4.5+ stars** = optimal zone. Sweet spot: 4.1-4.9
+- **5.0 stars** can look suspicious to users
+- **Below 3.5** = sharp visibility drop on both stores
+- **79% of users** check ratings before downloading
+- **50% reject** apps below 3 stars
+
+Sources: AppFollow, MobileAction, Sensor Tower, Troof.ai
+
+## Preview Video Impact
+
+**iOS:** +20-40% conversion lift (video autoplays on product page)
+**Google Play:** Minimal lift (only ~6% of visitors tap to play)
+
+- Autoplay introduced in iOS 11 caused **+47% conversion jump**
+- Users who watch video are **2x more likely to install**
+- Average watch time: **4-6.5 seconds** (first 5 seconds are critical)
+- 50%+ of viewers watch to the end
+
+**Takeaway:** Video is high-ROI on iOS, low-ROI on Google Play.
+
+Sources: StoreMaven, SplitMetrics, Leanplum
+
+## Screenshot Impact
+
+- **90% of users** do not scroll past the 3rd screenshot
+- Average scroll rate: only **17%**
+- Users spend **6-10 seconds** scanning before deciding
+- **First screenshot decides everything**
+- Well-designed screenshots lift conversion **20-35%**
+- A/B test winners see **10-25% improvement**
+- **Optimal count:** 4-5 for utility apps, 5-6 for complex apps
+- More than 6: diminishing returns, can cause decision paralysis
+- Top 200 apps update screenshots **2-4 times/year**
+- Top Google Play games update visuals **up to 8x/year**
+- **57% of top games** A/B tested screenshots at least 2x in 2024
+
+Sources: AppTweak, ASOMobile, Sensor Tower
+
+## Custom Product Pages (Apple CPPs)
+
+- Average conversion lift: **+5.9% for apps**, **+3.5% for games**
+- Best cases: up to **+8.6%**
+- Organic referral: **+2.5 percentage points** (156% lift vs 1.6% baseline)
+- Apple Ads CPP CVR: **55.8% in 2024** (up from 42.1% in 2023)
+- **Only 31% of apps** and **26% of games** use CPPs (low adoption = opportunity)
+- Screenshot reordering alone produced **+16.6% installs** in one case
+
+Sources: AppTweak, SplitMetrics, MobileAction
+
+## Custom Store Listings (Google Play CSLs)
+
+- Up to **50 custom versions** per app
+- Case study (Lockwood/Avakin Life): **+57% CVR** over 2 months
+- Can target inactive/churned users (28+ days no activity)
+
+Source: Phiture, MobileAction
+
+## In-App Events (Apple)
+
+- **55% of top 200 apps** use them regularly
+- +**15-20% more impressions** from editorial/browse placements
+- One case: **+124% surge** in total impressions
+- One case: **+50% impressions AND first-time downloads**
+- Search CVR uptick: **+10.3%**
+- Re-downloads increase: **+15.5%**
+- **Boost is short-lived** -- KPIs drop to baseline when event ends
+- Optimal: **2-4 active events per month**
+
+Sources: Phiture, AppTweak, Appalize
+
+## Promotional Content (Google Play)
+
+- Apps with featuring see **2x explore acquisitions** (official Google)
+- +2% 28-day active users and +4% revenue on average
+
+Source: Google Play Console documentation
+
+## A/B Test Impact Thresholds
+
+| Improvement | Classification                     |
+| ----------- | ---------------------------------- |
+| >10%        | Strong winner -- apply immediately |
+| 5-10%       | Meaningful winner                  |
+| 2-5%        | Marginal winner                    |
+| <2%         | Noise -- not significant           |
+
+Source: SplitMetrics, MobileAction