gsd-pi 2.80.0-dev.fbe7c8c6f → 2.81.0

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/model-unittype-mapping.test.ts

@@ -1,298 +1,90 @@
 /**
- * Model UnitType Mapping — regression tests for #2865.
+ * Model UnitType Mapping — behavior tests for #2865 / #2900 / ADR-011.
  *
- * Verifies that all auto-dispatch unitTypes have corresponding entries in:
- * - resolveModelWithFallbacksForUnit (preferences-models.ts)
- * - classifyUnitPhase (metrics.ts)
- * - LIFECYCLE_ONLY_UNITS (auto-post-unit.ts)
- * - unitVerb / unitPhaseLabel (auto-dashboard.ts)
- * - resolveExpectedArtifactPath (auto-artifact-paths.ts)
- *
- * Uses source-level checks to avoid import resolution issues in dev.
- *
- * Copyright (c) 2026 Jeremy McSpadden <jeremy@fluxlabs.net>
+ * Verifies model routing, metrics/dashboard labels, and artifact resolution
+ * through exported runtime APIs instead of inspecting source text.
  */
 
 import test from "node:test";
 import assert from "node:assert/strict";
-import { readFileSync } from "node:fs";
-import { join, dirname } from "node:path";
-import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
-
-const __dirname = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
-const gsdDir = join(__dirname, "..");
-
-function readSrc(file: string): string {
-  return readFileSync(join(gsdDir, file), "utf-8");
-}
-
-const preferencesSrc = readSrc("preferences-models.ts");
-const metricsSrc = readSrc("metrics.ts");
-const postUnitSrc = readSrc("auto-post-unit.ts");
-const dashboardSrc = readSrc("auto-dashboard.ts");
-const artifactSrc = readSrc("auto-artifact-paths.ts");
-const guidedFlowSrc = readSrc("guided-flow.ts");
-const autoDispatchSrc = readSrc("auto-dispatch.ts");
-
-// Derive unitTypes directly from auto-dispatch.ts source so the test
-// automatically tracks dispatch rule changes (Copilot review feedback).
-const AUTO_DISPATCH_UNIT_TYPES = (() => {
-  const unitTypeRegex = /unitType:\s*["']([^"']+)["']/g;
-  const unitTypes = new Set<string>();
-  let match: RegExpExecArray | null;
-  while ((match = unitTypeRegex.exec(autoDispatchSrc)) !== null) {
-    unitTypes.add(match[1]);
-  }
-  return Array.from(unitTypes);
-})();
-
-// Additionally include unitTypes used by guided-flow but not auto-dispatch
-// (e.g., discuss-slice is dispatched by guided-flow but not auto-dispatch).
-const ALL_KNOWN_UNIT_TYPES = [
-  ...new Set([...AUTO_DISPATCH_UNIT_TYPES, "discuss-slice"]),
-];
-
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-// #2865: discuss dispatches must NOT alias to plan unitTypes
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-test("#2865: no dispatchWorkflow with gsd-discuss customType uses plan-milestone", () => {
-  // Match dispatchWorkflow calls where "gsd-discuss" appears before "plan-milestone"
-  // in the same call (the 5 args are on consecutive lines).
-  const blocks = guidedFlowSrc.split(/dispatchWorkflow\(/);
-  for (const block of blocks) {
-    const callEnd = block.indexOf(");");
-    if (callEnd === -1) continue;
-    const call = block.slice(0, callEnd);
-    if (call.includes('"gsd-discuss"') && call.includes('"plan-milestone"')) {
-      assert.fail(`Discuss dispatch should not use plan-milestone: ...dispatchWorkflow(${call.slice(0, 120).trim()}...`);
-    }
-  }
-});
-
-test("#2865: no dispatchWorkflow with gsd-discuss customType uses plan-slice", () => {
-  const blocks = guidedFlowSrc.split(/dispatchWorkflow\(/);
-  for (const block of blocks) {
-    const callEnd = block.indexOf(");");
-    if (callEnd === -1) continue;
-    const call = block.slice(0, callEnd);
-    if (call.includes('"gsd-discuss"') && call.includes('"plan-slice"')) {
-      assert.fail(`Discuss slice dispatch should not use plan-slice: ...dispatchWorkflow(${call.slice(0, 120).trim()}...`);
-    }
+import { mkdirSync, mkdtempSync, realpathSync, rmSync, writeFileSync } from "node:fs";
+import { join } from "node:path";
+import { tmpdir } from "node:os";
+
+import { resolveExpectedArtifactPath } from "../auto-artifact-paths.ts";
+import { unitPhaseLabel, unitVerb } from "../auto-dashboard.ts";
+import { classifyUnitPhase } from "../metrics.ts";
+import { resolveModelWithFallbacksForUnit } from "../preferences-models.ts";
+import { KNOWN_UNIT_LABELS } from "../preferences-types.ts";
+
+function withModelPreferences<T>(fn: () => T): T {
+  const oldHome = process.env.GSD_HOME;
+  const home = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), "gsd-model-map-"));
+  try {
+    process.env.GSD_HOME = home;
+    writeFileSync(join(home, "preferences.md"), [
+      "---",
+      "models:",
+      "  research: research-model",
+      "  planning: planning-model",
+      "  discuss: discuss-model",
+      "  execution: execution-model",
+      "  execution_simple: simple-model",
+      "  completion: completion-model",
+      "  validation: validation-model",
+      "  subagent: subagent-model",
+      "---",
+      "",
+    ].join("\n"));
+    return fn();
+  } finally {
+    if (oldHome === undefined) delete process.env.GSD_HOME;
+    else process.env.GSD_HOME = oldHome;
+    rmSync(home, { recursive: true, force: true });
   }
-});
-
-test("#2865: no buildDiscussPrompt call dispatches with plan-milestone", () => {
-  const blocks = guidedFlowSrc.split(/dispatchWorkflow\(/);
-  for (const block of blocks) {
-    const callEnd = block.indexOf(");");
-    if (callEnd === -1) continue;
-    const call = block.slice(0, callEnd);
-    if (call.includes("buildDiscussPrompt") && call.includes('"plan-milestone"')) {
-      assert.fail(`buildDiscussPrompt dispatch should not use plan-milestone`);
-    }
-  }
-});
-
-test("#2865: no buildDiscussSlicePrompt call dispatches with plan-slice", () => {
-  const blocks = guidedFlowSrc.split(/dispatchWorkflow\(/);
-  for (const block of blocks) {
-    const callEnd = block.indexOf(");");
-    if (callEnd === -1) continue;
-    const call = block.slice(0, callEnd);
-    if (call.includes("buildDiscussSlicePrompt") && call.includes('"plan-slice"')) {
-      assert.fail(`buildDiscussSlicePrompt dispatch should not use plan-slice`);
-    }
-  }
-});
-
-test("#2865: no guided-discuss-milestone loadPrompt dispatches with plan-milestone", () => {
-  const blocks = guidedFlowSrc.split(/dispatchWorkflow\(/);
-  for (const block of blocks) {
-    const callEnd = block.indexOf(");");
-    if (callEnd === -1) continue;
-    const call = block.slice(0, callEnd);
-    if (call.includes("guided-discuss-milestone") && call.includes('"plan-milestone"')) {
-      assert.fail(`guided-discuss-milestone dispatch should not use plan-milestone`);
-    }
-  }
-});
-
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-// preferences-models.ts: resolveModelWithFallbacksForUnit coverage
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-test("resolveModelWithFallbacksForUnit handles discuss-milestone", () => {
-  assert.ok(preferencesSrc.includes('"discuss-milestone"'), "missing discuss-milestone case");
-});
-
-test("resolveModelWithFallbacksForUnit handles discuss-slice", () => {
-  assert.ok(preferencesSrc.includes('"discuss-slice"'), "missing discuss-slice case");
-});
-
-test("discuss unitTypes fall back to planning when models.discuss is unset", () => {
-  assert.ok(
-    preferencesSrc.includes("m.discuss ?? m.planning"),
-    "discuss should fall back to m.planning",
-  );
-});
-
-test("validation unitTypes fall back to planning when models.validation is unset", () => {
-  assert.ok(
-    preferencesSrc.includes("m.validation ?? m.planning"),
-    "validation should fall back to m.planning",
-  );
-});
-
-test("all auto-dispatch unitTypes have preference mapping or subagent handling", () => {
-  const unmapped: string[] = [];
-  for (const ut of ALL_KNOWN_UNIT_TYPES) {
-    if (!preferencesSrc.includes(`"${ut}"`)) {
-      unmapped.push(ut);
-    }
-  }
-  assert.deepEqual(unmapped, [], `Unmapped unitTypes in preferences-models.ts: ${unmapped.join(", ")}`);
-});
-
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-// #2900: worktree-merge must map to completion phase
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-test("#2900: resolveModelWithFallbacksForUnit handles worktree-merge", () => {
-  assert.ok(preferencesSrc.includes('"worktree-merge"'), "missing worktree-merge case in switch");
-});
-
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-// #2900: KNOWN_UNIT_TYPES must include all dispatched unit types
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-const preferenceTypesSrc = readSrc("preferences-types.ts");
-
-test("#2900: KNOWN_UNIT_TYPES includes all auto-dispatch unit types", () => {
-  const missing: string[] = [];
-  for (const ut of ALL_KNOWN_UNIT_TYPES) {
-    if (!preferenceTypesSrc.includes(`"${ut}"`)) {
-      missing.push(ut);
-    }
-  }
-  assert.deepEqual(missing, [], `Missing from KNOWN_UNIT_TYPES: ${missing.join(", ")}`);
-});
+}
 
-test("#2900: KNOWN_UNIT_TYPES includes worktree-merge", () => {
-  assert.ok(preferenceTypesSrc.includes('"worktree-merge"'), "worktree-merge missing from KNOWN_UNIT_TYPES");
+test("discuss unit types route to the discuss model bucket", () => {
+  withModelPreferences(() => {
+    assert.equal(resolveModelWithFallbacksForUnit("discuss-milestone")?.primary, "discuss-model");
+    assert.equal(resolveModelWithFallbacksForUnit("discuss-slice")?.primary, "discuss-model");
+  });
 });
 
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-// metrics.ts: classifyUnitPhase coverage
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-test("classifyUnitPhase includes discussion phase", () => {
-  assert.ok(metricsSrc.includes('"discussion"'), "MetricsPhase should include discussion");
+test("validation unit types route to the validation model bucket", () => {
+  withModelPreferences(() => {
+    assert.equal(resolveModelWithFallbacksForUnit("validate-milestone")?.primary, "validation-model");
+    assert.equal(resolveModelWithFallbacksForUnit("gate-evaluate")?.primary, "validation-model");
+  });
 });
 
-test("classifyUnitPhase maps discuss-milestone and discuss-slice", () => {
-  assert.ok(metricsSrc.includes('"discuss-milestone"'), "missing discuss-milestone in metrics");
-  assert.ok(metricsSrc.includes('"discuss-slice"'), "missing discuss-slice in metrics");
+test("worktree-merge routes to completion and is recognized as a unit label", () => {
+  withModelPreferences(() => {
+    assert.ok(KNOWN_UNIT_LABELS.includes("worktree-merge"));
+    assert.equal(resolveModelWithFallbacksForUnit("worktree-merge")?.primary, "completion-model");
+  });
 });
 
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-// auto-post-unit.ts: LIFECYCLE_ONLY_UNITS
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-test("LIFECYCLE_ONLY_UNITS includes discuss-slice", () => {
-  assert.ok(postUnitSrc.includes('"discuss-slice"'), "discuss-slice should be lifecycle-only");
+test("every known unit label with a dispatch phase resolves when all model buckets are configured", () => {
+  withModelPreferences(() => {
+    const missing = KNOWN_UNIT_LABELS.filter((unitType) => !resolveModelWithFallbacksForUnit(unitType));
+    assert.deepEqual(missing, []);
+  });
 });
 
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-// auto-dashboard.ts: display label coverage
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-test("unitVerb handles discuss-slice", () => {
-  assert.ok(dashboardSrc.includes('"discuss-slice"'), "missing discuss-slice in dashboard");
+test("discuss-slice has discussion metrics and dashboard labels", () => {
+  assert.equal(classifyUnitPhase("discuss-slice"), "discussion");
+  assert.equal(unitVerb("discuss-slice"), "discussing");
+  assert.equal(unitPhaseLabel("discuss-slice"), "DISCUSS");
 });
 
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-// auto-artifact-paths.ts: artifact resolution
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-// ADR-011: meta-test — every KNOWN_UNIT_TYPES entry must appear in all four
-// downstream registries so a future unit type added to KNOWN_UNIT_TYPES can't
-// silently fall through to wrong defaults in metrics/dashboard/artifacts/post-unit.
-// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-// Intentional exceptions — unit types that legitimately rely on default/null
-// behavior in a specific registry. Entries captured here reflect the current
-// baseline at the time ADR-011 landed; adding to this allowlist for a NEW unit
-// type requires explicit justification in the commit.
-//
-// Test intent: catch the case where someone adds a new unit type to
-// KNOWN_UNIT_TYPES but forgets to wire it into one of the four registries.
-// The allowlist freezes the baseline so pre-existing omissions do not block
-// the test, but any brand-new addition must be either handled or justified.
-// Deep-mode project-level units (workflow-preferences, discuss-project,
-// discuss-requirements, research-decision, research-project) operate above
-// the milestone/slice/task model. They do not produce slice-shaped artifacts,
-// they do not have per-unit dashboard renderers, and they do not have
-// post-unit hooks that mirror execute/complete patterns. They legitimately
-// rely on default behavior in all four registries. Adding them to the
-// allowlist with this justification.
-const DEEP_MODE_PROJECT_UNITS = [
-  "workflow-preferences",
-  "discuss-project",
-  "discuss-requirements",
-  "research-decision",
-  "research-project",
-];
-
-const REGISTRY_EXCEPTIONS: Record<string, Set<string>> = {
-  // metrics.ts classifyUnitPhase uses default → "execution" for most unit types.
-  "metrics.ts": new Set([
-    "worktree-merge", "custom-step",
-    "rewrite-docs", "run-uat", "gate-evaluate", "replan-slice",
-    "reactive-execute", "validate-milestone", "complete-milestone",
-    ...DEEP_MODE_PROJECT_UNITS,
-  ]),
-  "auto-dashboard.ts": new Set([
-    "worktree-merge",
-    "gate-evaluate", "reactive-execute", "validate-milestone", "complete-milestone",
-    ...DEEP_MODE_PROJECT_UNITS,
-  ]),
-  "auto-artifact-paths.ts": new Set([
-    "rewrite-docs", "gate-evaluate", "reactive-execute", "discuss-slice", "worktree-merge",
-    ...DEEP_MODE_PROJECT_UNITS,
-  ]),
-  "auto-post-unit.ts": new Set([
-    "execute-task", "reactive-execute", "gate-evaluate", "worktree-merge",
-    ...DEEP_MODE_PROJECT_UNITS,
-  ]),
-};
-
-const REGISTRY_SOURCES: Array<[string, string]> = [
-  ["metrics.ts", metricsSrc],
-  ["auto-dashboard.ts", dashboardSrc],
-  ["auto-artifact-paths.ts", artifactSrc],
-  ["auto-post-unit.ts", postUnitSrc],
-];
-
-test("ADR-011 meta: every KNOWN_UNIT_TYPES entry appears in all 4 downstream registries", () => {
-  const missing: Array<{ registry: string; unitType: string }> = [];
-  for (const [registry, src] of REGISTRY_SOURCES) {
-    for (const ut of ALL_KNOWN_UNIT_TYPES) {
-      if (REGISTRY_EXCEPTIONS[registry]?.has(ut)) continue;
-      if (!src.includes(`"${ut}"`)) {
-        missing.push({ registry, unitType: ut });
-      }
-    }
+test("discuss-slice resolves to the slice context artifact path", () => {
+  const base = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), "gsd-discuss-artifact-"));
+  try {
+    mkdirSync(join(base, ".gsd", "milestones", "M001", "slices", "S01"), { recursive: true });
+    const path = resolveExpectedArtifactPath("discuss-slice", "M001/S01", base);
+    assert.equal(path, join(realpathSync(base), ".gsd", "milestones", "M001", "slices", "S01", "S01-CONTEXT.md"));
+  } finally {
+    rmSync(base, { recursive: true, force: true });
   }
-  assert.deepEqual(
-    missing,
-    [],
-    "Each listed unit type is absent from the given registry — either add a handler or add to REGISTRY_EXCEPTIONS with justification:\n" +
-      missing.map((m) => `  ${m.registry}: "${m.unitType}"`).join("\n"),
-  );
-});
-
-test("resolveExpectedArtifactPath handles discuss-slice", () => {
-  assert.ok(artifactSrc.includes('"discuss-slice"'), "missing discuss-slice in artifact paths");
 });

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/native-git-bridge-exec-fallback.test.ts

@@ -12,11 +12,18 @@
 
 import { describe, test, beforeEach, afterEach } from "node:test";
 import assert from "node:assert/strict";
-import { chmodSync, mkdtempSync, writeFileSync, readFileSync, rmSync } from "node:fs";
+import { chmodSync, existsSync, mkdtempSync, writeFileSync, readFileSync, rmSync } from "node:fs";
 import { join } from "node:path";
 import { tmpdir } from "node:os";
 import { execFileSync } from "node:child_process";
-import { nativeIsRepo, nativeCommit, nativeResetHard, nativeBranchDelete } from "../native-git-bridge.js";
+import {
+  assertWorktreeMaterialized,
+  nativeBranchDelete,
+  nativeCommit,
+  nativeIsRepo,
+  nativeResetHard,
+  nativeWorktreeAdd,
+} from "../native-git-bridge.js";
 
 // Note: prior static-analysis tests that scanned native-git-bridge.ts for
 // the raw shell-spawn pattern were removed under #4827 — the integration
@@ -115,4 +122,29 @@ describe("native-git-bridge #4180: fallback runtime behaviour", () => {
       /GSD_GIT_ERROR|git branch -D does-not-exist failed/,
     );
   });
+
+  test("assertWorktreeMaterialized rejects directories without a .git file", (t) => {
+    const dir = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), "ngb-worktree-missing-git-"));
+    t.after(() => rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }));
+
+    assert.throws(
+      () => assertWorktreeMaterialized(dir),
+      /missing \.git file/,
+    );
+  });
+
+  test("nativeWorktreeAdd materializes a valid .git marker", (t) => {
+    const wtPath = join(repo, ".gsd", "worktrees", "M001");
+    t.after(() => {
+      try { git(["worktree", "remove", "--force", wtPath], repo); } catch { /* noop */ }
+    });
+
+    nativeWorktreeAdd(repo, wtPath, "milestone/M001", true, "HEAD");
+
+    assert.equal(
+      existsSync(join(wtPath, ".git")),
+      true,
+      "created worktree must have the .git file required by later health checks",
+    );
+  });
 });

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/needs-remediation-revalidation.test.ts

@@ -6,43 +6,50 @@
  * dispatch blocks completion for needs-remediation while state derives
  * completing-milestone, creating a permanent deadlock.
  *
- * This structural test verifies the verdict === 'needs-remediation' guard
- * exists at all three derivation paths in state.ts.
+ * This behavior test verifies DB-backed state derivation does not route a
+ * needs-remediation validation verdict into milestone completion.
  */
 
 import { describe, test } from 'node:test';
 import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
-import { readFileSync } from 'node:fs';
-import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
-import { dirname, join } from 'node:path';
-
-const __filename = fileURLToPath(import.meta.url);
-const __dirname = dirname(__filename);
-
-const source = readFileSync(join(__dirname, '..', 'state.ts'), 'utf-8');
+import { mkdtempSync, rmSync } from 'node:fs';
+import { join } from 'node:path';
+import { tmpdir } from 'node:os';
+import {
+  closeDatabase,
+  insertAssessment,
+  insertMilestone,
+  insertSlice,
+  openDatabase,
+} from '../gsd-db.ts';
+import { deriveStateFromDb } from '../state.ts';
 
 describe('needs-remediation revalidation guard (#3670)', () => {
-  test('verdict === needs-remediation guard exists in state.ts', () => {
-    const matches = source.match(/verdict\s*===\s*['"]needs-remediation['"]/g);
-    assert.ok(matches, 'verdict === "needs-remediation" check must exist in state.ts');
-    assert.ok(matches.length >= 2,
-      `Expected at least 2 needs-remediation guards (deriveStateFromDb + _deriveStateImpl), found ${matches.length}`);
-  });
+  test('needs-remediation assessment blocks completion when every slice is done', async () => {
+    const base = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), 'gsd-needs-remediation-'));
+    try {
+      openDatabase(':memory:');
+      insertMilestone({ id: 'M001', title: 'Needs remediation', status: 'active' });
+      insertSlice({ id: 'S01', milestoneId: 'M001', title: 'Done slice', status: 'complete' });
+      insertAssessment({
+        path: join(base, '.gsd', 'milestones', 'M001', 'M001-VALIDATION.md'),
+        milestoneId: 'M001',
+        status: 'needs-remediation',
+        scope: 'milestone-validation',
+        fullContent: 'Verdict: needs-remediation',
+      });
 
-  test('needsRevalidation variable is derived from verdict', () => {
-    assert.match(source, /needsRevalidation.*=.*verdict\s*===\s*['"]needs-remediation['"]/,
-      'needsRevalidation should incorporate verdict === "needs-remediation"');
-  });
-
-  test('deriveStateFromDb path uses needs-remediation guard', () => {
-    assert.match(source, /!validationTerminal\s*\|\|\s*verdict\s*===\s*['"]needs-remediation['"]/,
-      'deriveStateFromDb should check !validationTerminal || verdict === "needs-remediation"');
-  });
+      const state = await deriveStateFromDb(base);
 
-  test('extractVerdict is called on validation content', () => {
-    const extractCalls = source.match(/extractVerdict\(validationContent\)/g);
-    assert.ok(extractCalls, 'extractVerdict should be called on validation content');
-    assert.ok(extractCalls.length >= 2,
-      `Expected at least 2 extractVerdict calls, found ${extractCalls.length}`);
+      assert.equal(state.phase, 'blocked');
+      assert.match(state.nextAction, /remediation/i);
+      assert.ok(
+        state.blockers.some((blocker) => blocker.includes('needs-remediation')),
+        'blocked state explains the remediation verdict',
+      );
+    } finally {
+      closeDatabase();
+      rmSync(base, { recursive: true, force: true });
+    }
   });
 });

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/note-captures-executed.test.ts

@@ -6,41 +6,45 @@
  * adds a filter for classification === "note" and calls markCaptureExecuted
  * for each matching capture.
  *
- * Structural verification test — reads source to confirm the note filter
- * and markCaptureExecuted call exist.
+ * Behavior test — resolved note captures should be marked executed without
+ * dispatching inject/replan work.
  */
 
 import { describe, test } from 'node:test';
 import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
-import { readFileSync } from 'node:fs';
-import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
-import { dirname, join } from 'node:path';
-
-const __filename = fileURLToPath(import.meta.url);
-const __dirname = dirname(__filename);
-
-const source = readFileSync(join(__dirname, '..', 'triage-resolution.ts'), 'utf-8');
+import { mkdirSync, mkdtempSync, rmSync, writeFileSync } from 'node:fs';
+import { join } from 'node:path';
+import { tmpdir } from 'node:os';
+import { loadAllCaptures } from '../captures.ts';
+import { executeTriageResolutions } from '../triage-resolution.ts';
 
 describe('note captures executed in triage resolution (#3578)', () => {
-  test('markCaptureExecuted is imported', () => {
-    assert.match(source, /markCaptureExecuted/,
-      'markCaptureExecuted should be imported');
-  });
+  test('resolved note captures are stamped executed', () => {
+    const base = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), 'gsd-note-capture-'));
+    try {
+      mkdirSync(join(base, '.gsd'), { recursive: true });
+      writeFileSync(join(base, '.gsd', 'CAPTURES.md'), [
+        '# Captures',
+        '',
+        '### cap-note',
+        '**Text:** Remember this',
+        '**Captured:** 2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z',
+        '**Status:** resolved',
+        '**Classification:** note',
+        '**Resolution:** informational only',
+        '**Resolved:** 2026-01-01T00:01:00.000Z',
+        '',
+      ].join('\n'));
 
-  test('note classification filter exists', () => {
-    assert.match(source, /classification\s*===\s*"note"/,
-      'filter should check classification === "note"');
-  });
-
-  test('note filter checks resolved status and not-executed', () => {
-    assert.match(source, /status\s*===\s*"resolved"\s*&&\s*!c\.executed\s*&&\s*c\.classification\s*===\s*"note"/,
-      'filter should check resolved + not-executed + note classification');
-  });
+      const result = executeTriageResolutions(base, 'M001', 'S01');
+      const [capture] = loadAllCaptures(base);
 
-  test('markCaptureExecuted is called for note captures', () => {
-    // The source should call markCaptureExecuted for note captures
-    const noteSection = source.slice(source.indexOf('classification === "note"'));
-    assert.match(noteSection, /markCaptureExecuted\(basePath,\s*cap\.id\)/,
-      'markCaptureExecuted should be called for note captures');
+      assert.equal(result.injected, 0);
+      assert.equal(result.replanned, 0);
+      assert.ok(result.actions.some((action) => action.includes('Note acknowledged: cap-note')));
+      assert.equal(capture?.executed, true);
+    } finally {
+      rmSync(base, { recursive: true, force: true });
+    }
   });
 });