eyeling 1.5.12 → 1.5.14

package/examples/output/french-cities.n3

@@ -0,0 +1,507 @@
+@prefix : <http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/graph.axiom#> .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :paris :path :orleans .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :oneway rdfs:subPropertyOf :path .
+#   :paris :oneway :orleans .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P rdfs:subPropertyOf ?Q .
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?Q ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :orleans
+#   ?P = :oneway
+#   ?Q = :path
+#   ?S = :paris
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:paris :path :orleans .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :paris :path :chartres .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :oneway rdfs:subPropertyOf :path .
+#   :paris :oneway :chartres .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P rdfs:subPropertyOf ?Q .
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?Q ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :chartres
+#   ?P = :oneway
+#   ?Q = :path
+#   ?S = :paris
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:paris :path :chartres .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :paris :path :amiens .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :oneway rdfs:subPropertyOf :path .
+#   :paris :oneway :amiens .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P rdfs:subPropertyOf ?Q .
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?Q ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :amiens
+#   ?P = :oneway
+#   ?Q = :path
+#   ?S = :paris
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:paris :path :amiens .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :orleans :path :blois .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :oneway rdfs:subPropertyOf :path .
+#   :orleans :oneway :blois .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P rdfs:subPropertyOf ?Q .
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?Q ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :blois
+#   ?P = :oneway
+#   ?Q = :path
+#   ?S = :orleans
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:orleans :path :blois .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :orleans :path :bourges .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :oneway rdfs:subPropertyOf :path .
+#   :orleans :oneway :bourges .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P rdfs:subPropertyOf ?Q .
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?Q ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :bourges
+#   ?P = :oneway
+#   ?Q = :path
+#   ?S = :orleans
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:orleans :path :bourges .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :blois :path :tours .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :oneway rdfs:subPropertyOf :path .
+#   :blois :oneway :tours .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P rdfs:subPropertyOf ?Q .
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?Q ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :tours
+#   ?P = :oneway
+#   ?Q = :path
+#   ?S = :blois
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:blois :path :tours .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :chartres :path :lemans .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :oneway rdfs:subPropertyOf :path .
+#   :chartres :oneway :lemans .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P rdfs:subPropertyOf ?Q .
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?Q ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :lemans
+#   ?P = :oneway
+#   ?Q = :path
+#   ?S = :chartres
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:chartres :path :lemans .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :lemans :path :angers .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :oneway rdfs:subPropertyOf :path .
+#   :lemans :oneway :angers .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P rdfs:subPropertyOf ?Q .
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?Q ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :angers
+#   ?P = :oneway
+#   ?Q = :path
+#   ?S = :lemans
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:lemans :path :angers .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :lemans :path :tours .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :oneway rdfs:subPropertyOf :path .
+#   :lemans :oneway :tours .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P rdfs:subPropertyOf ?Q .
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?Q ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :tours
+#   ?P = :oneway
+#   ?Q = :path
+#   ?S = :lemans
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:lemans :path :tours .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :angers :path :nantes .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :oneway rdfs:subPropertyOf :path .
+#   :angers :oneway :nantes .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P rdfs:subPropertyOf ?Q .
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?Q ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :nantes
+#   ?P = :oneway
+#   ?Q = :path
+#   ?S = :angers
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:angers :path :nantes .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :lemans :path :nantes .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :path a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#   :lemans :path :angers .
+#   :angers :path :nantes .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#     ?S ?P ?X .
+#     ?X ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :nantes
+#   ?P = :path
+#   ?S = :lemans
+#   ?X = :angers
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:lemans :path :nantes .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :chartres :path :angers .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :path a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#   :chartres :path :lemans .
+#   :lemans :path :angers .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#     ?S ?P ?X .
+#     ?X ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :angers
+#   ?P = :path
+#   ?S = :chartres
+#   ?X = :lemans
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:chartres :path :angers .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :chartres :path :tours .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :path a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#   :chartres :path :lemans .
+#   :lemans :path :tours .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#     ?S ?P ?X .
+#     ?X ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :tours
+#   ?P = :path
+#   ?S = :chartres
+#   ?X = :lemans
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:chartres :path :tours .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :orleans :path :tours .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :path a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#   :orleans :path :blois .
+#   :blois :path :tours .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#     ?S ?P ?X .
+#     ?X ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :tours
+#   ?P = :path
+#   ?S = :orleans
+#   ?X = :blois
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:orleans :path :tours .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :paris :path :lemans .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :path a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#   :paris :path :chartres .
+#   :chartres :path :lemans .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#     ?S ?P ?X .
+#     ?X ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :lemans
+#   ?P = :path
+#   ?S = :paris
+#   ?X = :chartres
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:paris :path :lemans .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :paris :path :blois .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :path a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#   :paris :path :orleans .
+#   :orleans :path :blois .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#     ?S ?P ?X .
+#     ?X ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :blois
+#   ?P = :path
+#   ?S = :paris
+#   ?X = :orleans
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:paris :path :blois .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :paris :path :bourges .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :path a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#   :paris :path :orleans .
+#   :orleans :path :bourges .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#     ?S ?P ?X .
+#     ?X ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :bourges
+#   ?P = :path
+#   ?S = :paris
+#   ?X = :orleans
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:paris :path :bourges .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :paris :path :tours .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :path a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#   :paris :path :blois .
+#   :blois :path :tours .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#     ?S ?P ?X .
+#     ?X ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :tours
+#   ?P = :path
+#   ?S = :paris
+#   ?X = :blois
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:paris :path :tours .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :paris :path :angers .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :path a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#   :paris :path :lemans .
+#   :lemans :path :angers .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#     ?S ?P ?X .
+#     ?X ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :angers
+#   ?P = :path
+#   ?S = :paris
+#   ?X = :lemans
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:paris :path :angers .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :paris :path :nantes .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :path a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#   :paris :path :lemans .
+#   :lemans :path :nantes .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#     ?S ?P ?X .
+#     ?X ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :nantes
+#   ?P = :path
+#   ?S = :paris
+#   ?X = :lemans
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:paris :path :nantes .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :chartres :path :nantes .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :path a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#   :chartres :path :angers .
+#   :angers :path :nantes .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?P a owl:TransitiveProperty .
+#     ?S ?P ?X .
+#     ?X ?P ?O .
+#   } => {
+#     ?S ?P ?O .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?O = :nantes
+#   ?P = :path
+#   ?S = :chartres
+#   ?X = :angers
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:chartres :path :nantes .
+

package/examples/output/fuse.n3

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# Inference fuse triggered: a { ... } => false. rule fired.

package/examples/output/good-cobbler.n3

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+@prefix : <https://eyereasoner.github.io/ns#> .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   :test :is {
+#       :joe :is (:good :Cobbler) .
+#   } .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   :joe :is (:good :Cobbler) .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ?X :is (:good ?Y) .
+#   } => {
+#     :test :is {
+#         ?X :is (:good ?Y) .
+#     } .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?X = :joe
+#   ?Y = :Cobbler
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:test :is {
+    :joe :is (:good :Cobbler) .
+} .
+

package/examples/output/gray-code-counter.n3

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+@prefix : <https://eyereasoner.github.io/eye/reasoning#> .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   ((1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1) (0 0 0)) :isgcc ((0 0 1) (0 1 1) (0 1 0) (1 1 0) (1 1 1) (1 0 1) (1 0 0) (0 0 0) (0 0 1)) .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   ((1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1) (0 0 0)) :testgcc ((0 0 1) (0 1 1) (0 1 0) (1 1 0) (1 1 1) (1 0 1) (1 0 0) (0 0 0) (0 0 1)) .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     ((1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1) (0 0 0)) :testgcc ?Q .
+#   } => {
+#     ((1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1) (0 0 0)) :isgcc ?Q .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?Q = ((0 0 1) (0 1 1) (0 1 0) (1 1 0) (1 1 1) (1 0 1) (1 0 0) (0 0 0) (0 0 1))
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+((1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1) (0 0 0)) :isgcc ((0 0 1) (0 1 1) (0 1 0) (1 1 0) (1 1 1) (1 0 1) (1 0 0) (0 0 0) (0 0 1)) .
+

package/examples/output/hanoi.n3

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+@prefix : <https://eyereasoner.github.io/eye/reasoning#> .
+
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Proof for derived triple:
+#   3 :answer ((:left :right) (:left :center) (:right :center) (:left :right) (:center :left) (:center :right) (:left :right)) .
+# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
+#   (3 :left :right :center) :moves ((:left :right) (:left :center) (:right :center) (:left :right) (:center :left) (:center :right) (:left :right)) .
+# via the schematic forward rule:
+#   {
+#     (3 :left :right :center) :moves ?M .
+#   } => {
+#     3 :answer ?M .
+#   } .
+# with substitution (on rule variables):
+#   ?M = ((:left :right) (:left :center) (:right :center) (:left :right) (:center :left) (:center :right) (:left :right))
+# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
+# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+3 :answer ((:left :right) (:left :center) (:right :center) (:left :right) (:center :left) (:center :right) (:left :right)) .
+

package/examples/output/liar.n3

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# Inference fuse triggered: a { ... } => false. rule fired.