codeply-cli 0.5.6 → 0.6.0

package/skills/regex-vs-llm-structured-text/SKILL.md

@@ -1,221 +1,221 @@
----
-name: regex-vs-llm-structured-text
-description: Decision framework for choosing between regex and LLM when parsing structured text — start with regex, add LLM only for low-confidence edge cases.
-metadata:
-  origin: ECC
----
-
-# Regex vs LLM for Structured Text Parsing
-
-A practical decision framework for parsing structured text (quizzes, forms, invoices, documents). The key insight: regex handles 95-98% of cases cheaply and deterministically. Reserve expensive LLM calls for the remaining edge cases.
-
-## When to Activate
-
-- Parsing structured text with repeating patterns (questions, forms, tables)
-- Deciding between regex and LLM for text extraction
-- Building hybrid pipelines that combine both approaches
-- Optimizing cost/accuracy tradeoffs in text processing
-
-## Decision Framework
-
-```
-Is the text format consistent and repeating?
-├── Yes (>90% follows a pattern) → Start with Regex
-│   ├── Regex handles 95%+ → Done, no LLM needed
-│   └── Regex handles <95% → Add LLM for edge cases only
-└── No (free-form, highly variable) → Use LLM directly
-```
-
-## Architecture Pattern
-
-```
-Source Text
-    │
-    ▼
-[Regex Parser] ─── Extracts structure (95-98% accuracy)
-    │
-    ▼
-[Text Cleaner] ─── Removes noise (markers, page numbers, artifacts)
-    │
-    ▼
-[Confidence Scorer] ─── Flags low-confidence extractions
-    │
-    ├── High confidence (≥0.95) → Direct output
-    │
-    └── Low confidence (<0.95) → [LLM Validator] → Output
-```
-
-## Implementation
-
-### 1. Regex Parser (Handles the Majority)
-
-```python
-import re
-from dataclasses import dataclass
-
-@dataclass(frozen=True)
-class ParsedItem:
-    id: str
-    text: str
-    choices: tuple[str, ...]
-    answer: str
-    confidence: float = 1.0
-
-def parse_structured_text(content: str) -> list[ParsedItem]:
-    """Parse structured text using regex patterns."""
-    pattern = re.compile(
-        r"(?P<id>\d+)\.\s*(?P<text>.+?)\n"
-        r"(?P<choices>(?:[A-D]\..+?\n)+)"
-        r"Answer:\s*(?P<answer>[A-D])",
-        re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL,
-    )
-    items = []
-    for match in pattern.finditer(content):
-        choices = tuple(
-            c.strip() for c in re.findall(r"[A-D]\.\s*(.+)", match.group("choices"))
-        )
-        items.append(ParsedItem(
-            id=match.group("id"),
-            text=match.group("text").strip(),
-            choices=choices,
-            answer=match.group("answer"),
-        ))
-    return items
-```
-
-### 2. Confidence Scoring
-
-Flag items that may need LLM review:
-
-```python
-@dataclass(frozen=True)
-class ConfidenceFlag:
-    item_id: str
-    score: float
-    reasons: tuple[str, ...]
-
-def score_confidence(item: ParsedItem) -> ConfidenceFlag:
-    """Score extraction confidence and flag issues."""
-    reasons = []
-    score = 1.0
-
-    if len(item.choices) < 3:
-        reasons.append("few_choices")
-        score -= 0.3
-
-    if not item.answer:
-        reasons.append("missing_answer")
-        score -= 0.5
-
-    if len(item.text) < 10:
-        reasons.append("short_text")
-        score -= 0.2
-
-    return ConfidenceFlag(
-        item_id=item.id,
-        score=max(0.0, score),
-        reasons=tuple(reasons),
-    )
-
-def identify_low_confidence(
-    items: list[ParsedItem],
-    threshold: float = 0.95,
-) -> list[ConfidenceFlag]:
-    """Return items below confidence threshold."""
-    flags = [score_confidence(item) for item in items]
-    return [f for f in flags if f.score < threshold]
-```
-
-### 3. LLM Validator (Edge Cases Only)
-
-```python
-def validate_with_llm(
-    item: ParsedItem,
-    original_text: str,
-    client,
-) -> ParsedItem:
-    """Use LLM to fix low-confidence extractions."""
-    response = client.messages.create(
-        model="claude-haiku-4-5-20251001",  # Cheapest model for validation
-        max_tokens=500,
-        messages=[{
-            "role": "user",
-            "content": (
-                f"Extract the question, choices, and answer from this text.\n\n"
-                f"Text: {original_text}\n\n"
-                f"Current extraction: {item}\n\n"
-                f"Return corrected JSON if needed, or 'CORRECT' if accurate."
-            ),
-        }],
-    )
-    # Parse LLM response and return corrected item...
-    return corrected_item
-```
-
-### 4. Hybrid Pipeline
-
-```python
-def process_document(
-    content: str,
-    *,
-    llm_client=None,
-    confidence_threshold: float = 0.95,
-) -> list[ParsedItem]:
-    """Full pipeline: regex -> confidence check -> LLM for edge cases."""
-    # Step 1: Regex extraction (handles 95-98%)
-    items = parse_structured_text(content)
-
-    # Step 2: Confidence scoring
-    low_confidence = identify_low_confidence(items, confidence_threshold)
-
-    if not low_confidence or llm_client is None:
-        return items
-
-    # Step 3: LLM validation (only for flagged items)
-    low_conf_ids = {f.item_id for f in low_confidence}
-    result = []
-    for item in items:
-        if item.id in low_conf_ids:
-            result.append(validate_with_llm(item, content, llm_client))
-        else:
-            result.append(item)
-
-    return result
-```
-
-## Real-World Metrics
-
-From a production quiz parsing pipeline (410 items):
-
-| Metric | Value |
-|--------|-------|
-| Regex success rate | 98.0% |
-| Low confidence items | 8 (2.0%) |
-| LLM calls needed | ~5 |
-| Cost savings vs all-LLM | ~95% |
-| Test coverage | 93% |
-
-## Best Practices
-
-- **Start with regex** — even imperfect regex gives you a baseline to improve
-- **Use confidence scoring** to programmatically identify what needs LLM help
-- **Use the cheapest LLM** for validation (Haiku-class models are sufficient)
-- **Never mutate** parsed items — return new instances from cleaning/validation steps
-- **TDD works well** for parsers — write tests for known patterns first, then edge cases
-- **Log metrics** (regex success rate, LLM call count) to track pipeline health
-
-## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
-
-- Sending all text to an LLM when regex handles 95%+ of cases (expensive and slow)
-- Using regex for free-form, highly variable text (LLM is better here)
-- Skipping confidence scoring and hoping regex "just works"
-- Mutating parsed objects during cleaning/validation steps
-- Not testing edge cases (malformed input, missing fields, encoding issues)
-
-## When to Use
-
-- Quiz/exam question parsing
-- Form data extraction
-- Invoice/receipt processing
-- Document structure parsing (headers, sections, tables)
-- Any structured text with repeating patterns where cost matters
+---
+name: regex-vs-llm-structured-text
+description: Decision framework for choosing between regex and LLM when parsing structured text — start with regex, add LLM only for low-confidence edge cases.
+metadata:
+  origin: ECC
+---
+
+# Regex vs LLM for Structured Text Parsing
+
+A practical decision framework for parsing structured text (quizzes, forms, invoices, documents). The key insight: regex handles 95-98% of cases cheaply and deterministically. Reserve expensive LLM calls for the remaining edge cases.
+
+## When to Activate
+
+- Parsing structured text with repeating patterns (questions, forms, tables)
+- Deciding between regex and LLM for text extraction
+- Building hybrid pipelines that combine both approaches
+- Optimizing cost/accuracy tradeoffs in text processing
+
+## Decision Framework
+
+```
+Is the text format consistent and repeating?
+├── Yes (>90% follows a pattern) → Start with Regex
+│   ├── Regex handles 95%+ → Done, no LLM needed
+│   └── Regex handles <95% → Add LLM for edge cases only
+└── No (free-form, highly variable) → Use LLM directly
+```
+
+## Architecture Pattern
+
+```
+Source Text
+    │
+    ▼
+[Regex Parser] ─── Extracts structure (95-98% accuracy)
+    │
+    ▼
+[Text Cleaner] ─── Removes noise (markers, page numbers, artifacts)
+    │
+    ▼
+[Confidence Scorer] ─── Flags low-confidence extractions
+    │
+    ├── High confidence (≥0.95) → Direct output
+    │
+    └── Low confidence (<0.95) → [LLM Validator] → Output
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### 1. Regex Parser (Handles the Majority)
+
+```python
+import re
+from dataclasses import dataclass
+
+@dataclass(frozen=True)
+class ParsedItem:
+    id: str
+    text: str
+    choices: tuple[str, ...]
+    answer: str
+    confidence: float = 1.0
+
+def parse_structured_text(content: str) -> list[ParsedItem]:
+    """Parse structured text using regex patterns."""
+    pattern = re.compile(
+        r"(?P<id>\d+)\.\s*(?P<text>.+?)\n"
+        r"(?P<choices>(?:[A-D]\..+?\n)+)"
+        r"Answer:\s*(?P<answer>[A-D])",
+        re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL,
+    )
+    items = []
+    for match in pattern.finditer(content):
+        choices = tuple(
+            c.strip() for c in re.findall(r"[A-D]\.\s*(.+)", match.group("choices"))
+        )
+        items.append(ParsedItem(
+            id=match.group("id"),
+            text=match.group("text").strip(),
+            choices=choices,
+            answer=match.group("answer"),
+        ))
+    return items
+```
+
+### 2. Confidence Scoring
+
+Flag items that may need LLM review:
+
+```python
+@dataclass(frozen=True)
+class ConfidenceFlag:
+    item_id: str
+    score: float
+    reasons: tuple[str, ...]
+
+def score_confidence(item: ParsedItem) -> ConfidenceFlag:
+    """Score extraction confidence and flag issues."""
+    reasons = []
+    score = 1.0
+
+    if len(item.choices) < 3:
+        reasons.append("few_choices")
+        score -= 0.3
+
+    if not item.answer:
+        reasons.append("missing_answer")
+        score -= 0.5
+
+    if len(item.text) < 10:
+        reasons.append("short_text")
+        score -= 0.2
+
+    return ConfidenceFlag(
+        item_id=item.id,
+        score=max(0.0, score),
+        reasons=tuple(reasons),
+    )
+
+def identify_low_confidence(
+    items: list[ParsedItem],
+    threshold: float = 0.95,
+) -> list[ConfidenceFlag]:
+    """Return items below confidence threshold."""
+    flags = [score_confidence(item) for item in items]
+    return [f for f in flags if f.score < threshold]
+```
+
+### 3. LLM Validator (Edge Cases Only)
+
+```python
+def validate_with_llm(
+    item: ParsedItem,
+    original_text: str,
+    client,
+) -> ParsedItem:
+    """Use LLM to fix low-confidence extractions."""
+    response = client.messages.create(
+        model="claude-haiku-4-5-20251001",  # Cheapest model for validation
+        max_tokens=500,
+        messages=[{
+            "role": "user",
+            "content": (
+                f"Extract the question, choices, and answer from this text.\n\n"
+                f"Text: {original_text}\n\n"
+                f"Current extraction: {item}\n\n"
+                f"Return corrected JSON if needed, or 'CORRECT' if accurate."
+            ),
+        }],
+    )
+    # Parse LLM response and return corrected item...
+    return corrected_item
+```
+
+### 4. Hybrid Pipeline
+
+```python
+def process_document(
+    content: str,
+    *,
+    llm_client=None,
+    confidence_threshold: float = 0.95,
+) -> list[ParsedItem]:
+    """Full pipeline: regex -> confidence check -> LLM for edge cases."""
+    # Step 1: Regex extraction (handles 95-98%)
+    items = parse_structured_text(content)
+
+    # Step 2: Confidence scoring
+    low_confidence = identify_low_confidence(items, confidence_threshold)
+
+    if not low_confidence or llm_client is None:
+        return items
+
+    # Step 3: LLM validation (only for flagged items)
+    low_conf_ids = {f.item_id for f in low_confidence}
+    result = []
+    for item in items:
+        if item.id in low_conf_ids:
+            result.append(validate_with_llm(item, content, llm_client))
+        else:
+            result.append(item)
+
+    return result
+```
+
+## Real-World Metrics
+
+From a production quiz parsing pipeline (410 items):
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Regex success rate | 98.0% |
+| Low confidence items | 8 (2.0%) |
+| LLM calls needed | ~5 |
+| Cost savings vs all-LLM | ~95% |
+| Test coverage | 93% |
+
+## Best Practices
+
+- **Start with regex** — even imperfect regex gives you a baseline to improve
+- **Use confidence scoring** to programmatically identify what needs LLM help
+- **Use the cheapest LLM** for validation (Haiku-class models are sufficient)
+- **Never mutate** parsed items — return new instances from cleaning/validation steps
+- **TDD works well** for parsers — write tests for known patterns first, then edge cases
+- **Log metrics** (regex success rate, LLM call count) to track pipeline health
+
+## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
+
+- Sending all text to an LLM when regex handles 95%+ of cases (expensive and slow)
+- Using regex for free-form, highly variable text (LLM is better here)
+- Skipping confidence scoring and hoping regex "just works"
+- Mutating parsed objects during cleaning/validation steps
+- Not testing edge cases (malformed input, missing fields, encoding issues)
+
+## When to Use
+
+- Quiz/exam question parsing
+- Form data extraction
+- Invoice/receipt processing
+- Document structure parsing (headers, sections, tables)
+- Any structured text with repeating patterns where cost matters

package/skills/remotion-video-creation/SKILL.md

@@ -1,43 +1,43 @@
----
-name: remotion-video-creation
-description: Best practices for Remotion - Video creation in React. 29 domain-specific rules covering 3D, animations, audio, captions, charts, transitions, and more.
-metadata:
-  tags: remotion, video, react, animation, composition, three.js, lottie
----
-
-## When to use
-
-Use this skills whenever you are dealing with Remotion code to obtain the domain-specific knowledge.
-
-## How to use
-
-Read individual rule files for detailed explanations and code examples:
-
-- [rules/3d.md](rules/3d.md) - 3D content in Remotion using Three.js and React Three Fiber
-- [rules/animations.md](rules/animations.md) - Fundamental animation skills for Remotion
-- [rules/assets.md](rules/assets.md) - Importing images, videos, audio, and fonts into Remotion
-- [rules/audio.md](rules/audio.md) - Using audio and sound in Remotion - importing, trimming, volume, speed, pitch
-- [rules/calculate-metadata.md](rules/calculate-metadata.md) - Dynamically set composition duration, dimensions, and props
-- [rules/can-decode.md](rules/can-decode.md) - Check if a video can be decoded by the browser using Mediabunny
-- [rules/charts.md](rules/charts.md) - Chart and data visualization patterns for Remotion
-- [rules/compositions.md](rules/compositions.md) - Defining compositions, stills, folders, default props and dynamic metadata
-- [rules/display-captions.md](rules/display-captions.md) - Displaying captions in Remotion with TikTok-style pages and word highlighting
-- [rules/extract-frames.md](rules/extract-frames.md) - Extract frames from videos at specific timestamps using Mediabunny
-- [rules/fonts.md](rules/fonts.md) - Loading Google Fonts and local fonts in Remotion
-- [rules/get-audio-duration.md](rules/get-audio-duration.md) - Getting the duration of an audio file in seconds with Mediabunny
-- [rules/get-video-dimensions.md](rules/get-video-dimensions.md) - Getting the width and height of a video file with Mediabunny
-- [rules/get-video-duration.md](rules/get-video-duration.md) - Getting the duration of a video file in seconds with Mediabunny
-- [rules/gifs.md](rules/gifs.md) - Displaying GIFs synchronized with Remotion's timeline
-- [rules/images.md](rules/images.md) - Embedding images in Remotion using the Img component
-- [rules/import-srt-captions.md](rules/import-srt-captions.md) - Importing .srt subtitle files into Remotion using @remotion/captions
-- [rules/lottie.md](rules/lottie.md) - Embedding Lottie animations in Remotion
-- [rules/measuring-dom-nodes.md](rules/measuring-dom-nodes.md) - Measuring DOM element dimensions in Remotion
-- [rules/measuring-text.md](rules/measuring-text.md) - Measuring text dimensions, fitting text to containers, and checking overflow
-- [rules/sequencing.md](rules/sequencing.md) - Sequencing patterns for Remotion - delay, trim, limit duration of items
-- [rules/tailwind.md](rules/tailwind.md) - Using TailwindCSS in Remotion
-- [rules/text-animations.md](rules/text-animations.md) - Typography and text animation patterns for Remotion
-- [rules/timing.md](rules/timing.md) - Interpolation curves in Remotion - linear, easing, spring animations
-- [rules/transcribe-captions.md](rules/transcribe-captions.md) - Transcribing audio to generate captions in Remotion
-- [rules/transitions.md](rules/transitions.md) - Scene transition patterns for Remotion
-- [rules/trimming.md](rules/trimming.md) - Trimming patterns for Remotion - cut the beginning or end of animations
-- [rules/videos.md](rules/videos.md) - Embedding videos in Remotion - trimming, volume, speed, looping, pitch
+---
+name: remotion-video-creation
+description: Best practices for Remotion - Video creation in React. 29 domain-specific rules covering 3D, animations, audio, captions, charts, transitions, and more.
+metadata:
+  tags: remotion, video, react, animation, composition, three.js, lottie
+---
+
+## When to use
+
+Use this skills whenever you are dealing with Remotion code to obtain the domain-specific knowledge.
+
+## How to use
+
+Read individual rule files for detailed explanations and code examples:
+
+- [rules/3d.md](rules/3d.md) - 3D content in Remotion using Three.js and React Three Fiber
+- [rules/animations.md](rules/animations.md) - Fundamental animation skills for Remotion
+- [rules/assets.md](rules/assets.md) - Importing images, videos, audio, and fonts into Remotion
+- [rules/audio.md](rules/audio.md) - Using audio and sound in Remotion - importing, trimming, volume, speed, pitch
+- [rules/calculate-metadata.md](rules/calculate-metadata.md) - Dynamically set composition duration, dimensions, and props
+- [rules/can-decode.md](rules/can-decode.md) - Check if a video can be decoded by the browser using Mediabunny
+- [rules/charts.md](rules/charts.md) - Chart and data visualization patterns for Remotion
+- [rules/compositions.md](rules/compositions.md) - Defining compositions, stills, folders, default props and dynamic metadata
+- [rules/display-captions.md](rules/display-captions.md) - Displaying captions in Remotion with TikTok-style pages and word highlighting
+- [rules/extract-frames.md](rules/extract-frames.md) - Extract frames from videos at specific timestamps using Mediabunny
+- [rules/fonts.md](rules/fonts.md) - Loading Google Fonts and local fonts in Remotion
+- [rules/get-audio-duration.md](rules/get-audio-duration.md) - Getting the duration of an audio file in seconds with Mediabunny
+- [rules/get-video-dimensions.md](rules/get-video-dimensions.md) - Getting the width and height of a video file with Mediabunny
+- [rules/get-video-duration.md](rules/get-video-duration.md) - Getting the duration of a video file in seconds with Mediabunny
+- [rules/gifs.md](rules/gifs.md) - Displaying GIFs synchronized with Remotion's timeline
+- [rules/images.md](rules/images.md) - Embedding images in Remotion using the Img component
+- [rules/import-srt-captions.md](rules/import-srt-captions.md) - Importing .srt subtitle files into Remotion using @remotion/captions
+- [rules/lottie.md](rules/lottie.md) - Embedding Lottie animations in Remotion
+- [rules/measuring-dom-nodes.md](rules/measuring-dom-nodes.md) - Measuring DOM element dimensions in Remotion
+- [rules/measuring-text.md](rules/measuring-text.md) - Measuring text dimensions, fitting text to containers, and checking overflow
+- [rules/sequencing.md](rules/sequencing.md) - Sequencing patterns for Remotion - delay, trim, limit duration of items
+- [rules/tailwind.md](rules/tailwind.md) - Using TailwindCSS in Remotion
+- [rules/text-animations.md](rules/text-animations.md) - Typography and text animation patterns for Remotion
+- [rules/timing.md](rules/timing.md) - Interpolation curves in Remotion - linear, easing, spring animations
+- [rules/transcribe-captions.md](rules/transcribe-captions.md) - Transcribing audio to generate captions in Remotion
+- [rules/transitions.md](rules/transitions.md) - Scene transition patterns for Remotion
+- [rules/trimming.md](rules/trimming.md) - Trimming patterns for Remotion - cut the beginning or end of animations
+- [rules/videos.md](rules/videos.md) - Embedding videos in Remotion - trimming, volume, speed, looping, pitch