aw-ecc 1.4.21

package/.opencode/commands/code-review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+---
+description: Review code for quality, security, and maintainability
+agent: code-reviewer
+subtask: true
+---
+
+# Code Review Command
+
+Review code changes for quality, security, and maintainability: $ARGUMENTS
+
+## Your Task
+
+1. **Get changed files**: Run `git diff --name-only HEAD`
+2. **Analyze each file** for issues
+3. **Generate structured report**
+4. **Provide actionable recommendations**
+
+## Check Categories
+
+### Security Issues (CRITICAL)
+- [ ] Hardcoded credentials, API keys, tokens
+- [ ] SQL injection vulnerabilities
+- [ ] XSS vulnerabilities
+- [ ] Missing input validation
+- [ ] Insecure dependencies
+- [ ] Path traversal risks
+- [ ] Authentication/authorization flaws
+
+### Code Quality (HIGH)
+- [ ] Functions > 50 lines
+- [ ] Files > 800 lines
+- [ ] Nesting depth > 4 levels
+- [ ] Missing error handling
+- [ ] console.log statements
+- [ ] TODO/FIXME comments
+- [ ] Missing JSDoc for public APIs
+
+### Best Practices (MEDIUM)
+- [ ] Mutation patterns (use immutable instead)
+- [ ] Unnecessary complexity
+- [ ] Missing tests for new code
+- [ ] Accessibility issues (a11y)
+- [ ] Performance concerns
+
+### Style (LOW)
+- [ ] Inconsistent naming
+- [ ] Missing type annotations
+- [ ] Formatting issues
+
+## Report Format
+
+For each issue found:
+
+```
+**[SEVERITY]** file.ts:123
+Issue: [Description]
+Fix: [How to fix]
+```
+
+## Decision
+
+- **CRITICAL or HIGH issues**: Block commit, require fixes
+- **MEDIUM issues**: Recommend fixes before merge
+- **LOW issues**: Optional improvements
+
+---
+
+**IMPORTANT**: Never approve code with security vulnerabilities!

package/.opencode/commands/e2e.md

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+---
+description: Generate and run E2E tests with Playwright
+agent: e2e-runner
+subtask: true
+---
+
+# E2E Command
+
+Generate and run end-to-end tests using Playwright: $ARGUMENTS
+
+## Your Task
+
+1. **Analyze user flow** to test
+2. **Create test journey** with Playwright
+3. **Run tests** and capture artifacts
+4. **Report results** with screenshots/videos
+
+## Test Structure
+
+```typescript
+import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test'
+
+test.describe('Feature: [Name]', () => {
+  test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
+    // Setup: Navigate, authenticate, prepare state
+  })
+
+  test('should [expected behavior]', async ({ page }) => {
+    // Arrange: Set up test data
+
+    // Act: Perform user actions
+    await page.click('[data-testid="button"]')
+    await page.fill('[data-testid="input"]', 'value')
+
+    // Assert: Verify results
+    await expect(page.locator('[data-testid="result"]')).toBeVisible()
+  })
+
+  test.afterEach(async ({ page }, testInfo) => {
+    // Capture screenshot on failure
+    if (testInfo.status !== 'passed') {
+      await page.screenshot({ path: `test-results/${testInfo.title}.png` })
+    }
+  })
+})
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+### Selectors
+- Prefer `data-testid` attributes
+- Avoid CSS classes (they change)
+- Use semantic selectors (roles, labels)
+
+### Waits
+- Use Playwright's auto-waiting
+- Avoid `page.waitForTimeout()`
+- Use `expect().toBeVisible()` for assertions
+
+### Test Isolation
+- Each test should be independent
+- Clean up test data after
+- Don't rely on test order
+
+## Artifacts to Capture
+
+- Screenshots on failure
+- Videos for debugging
+- Trace files for detailed analysis
+- Network logs if relevant
+
+## Test Categories
+
+1. **Critical User Flows**
+   - Authentication (login, logout, signup)
+   - Core feature happy paths
+   - Payment/checkout flows
+
+2. **Edge Cases**
+   - Network failures
+   - Invalid inputs
+   - Session expiry
+
+3. **Cross-Browser**
+   - Chrome, Firefox, Safari
+   - Mobile viewports
+
+## Report Format
+
+```
+E2E Test Results
+================
+✅ Passed: X
+❌ Failed: Y
+⏭️ Skipped: Z
+
+Failed Tests:
+- test-name: Error message
+  Screenshot: path/to/screenshot.png
+  Video: path/to/video.webm
+```
+
+---
+
+**TIP**: Run with `--headed` flag for debugging: `npx playwright test --headed`

package/.opencode/commands/eval.md

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+---
+description: Run evaluation against acceptance criteria
+agent: build
+---
+
+# Eval Command
+
+Evaluate implementation against acceptance criteria: $ARGUMENTS
+
+## Your Task
+
+Run structured evaluation to verify the implementation meets requirements.
+
+## Evaluation Framework
+
+### Grader Types
+
+1. **Binary Grader** - Pass/Fail
+   - Does it work? Yes/No
+   - Good for: feature completion, bug fixes
+
+2. **Scalar Grader** - Score 0-100
+   - How well does it work?
+   - Good for: performance, quality metrics
+
+3. **Rubric Grader** - Category scores
+   - Multiple dimensions evaluated
+   - Good for: comprehensive review
+
+## Evaluation Process
+
+### Step 1: Define Criteria
+
+```
+Acceptance Criteria:
+1. [Criterion 1] - [weight]
+2. [Criterion 2] - [weight]
+3. [Criterion 3] - [weight]
+```
+
+### Step 2: Run Tests
+
+For each criterion:
+- Execute relevant test
+- Collect evidence
+- Score result
+
+### Step 3: Calculate Score
+
+```
+Final Score = Σ (criterion_score × weight) / total_weight
+```
+
+### Step 4: Report
+
+## Evaluation Report
+
+### Overall: [PASS/FAIL] (Score: X/100)
+
+### Criterion Breakdown
+
+| Criterion | Score | Weight | Weighted |
+|-----------|-------|--------|----------|
+| [Criterion 1] | X/10 | 30% | X |
+| [Criterion 2] | X/10 | 40% | X |
+| [Criterion 3] | X/10 | 30% | X |
+
+### Evidence
+
+**Criterion 1: [Name]**
+- Test: [what was tested]
+- Result: [outcome]
+- Evidence: [screenshot, log, output]
+
+### Recommendations
+
+[If not passing, what needs to change]
+
+## Pass@K Metrics
+
+For non-deterministic evaluations:
+- Run K times
+- Calculate pass rate
+- Report: "Pass@K = X/K"
+
+---
+
+**TIP**: Use eval for acceptance testing before marking features complete.

package/.opencode/commands/evolve.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+---
+description: Analyze instincts and suggest or generate evolved structures
+agent: build
+---
+
+# Evolve Command
+
+Analyze and evolve instincts in continuous-learning-v2: $ARGUMENTS
+
+## Your Task
+
+Run:
+
+```bash
+python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py" evolve $ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+If `CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT` is unavailable, use:
+
+```bash
+python3 ~/.claude/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py evolve $ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+## Supported Args (v2.1)
+
+- no args: analysis only
+- `--generate`: also generate files under `evolved/{skills,commands,agents}`
+
+## Behavior Notes
+
+- Uses project + global instincts for analysis.
+- Shows skill/command/agent candidates from trigger and domain clustering.
+- Shows project -> global promotion candidates.
+- With `--generate`, output path is:
+  - project context: `~/.claude/homunculus/projects/<project-id>/evolved/`
+  - global fallback: `~/.claude/homunculus/evolved/`

package/.opencode/commands/go-build.md

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+---
+description: Fix Go build and vet errors
+agent: go-build-resolver
+subtask: true
+---
+
+# Go Build Command
+
+Fix Go build, vet, and compilation errors: $ARGUMENTS
+
+## Your Task
+
+1. **Run go build**: `go build ./...`
+2. **Run go vet**: `go vet ./...`
+3. **Fix errors** one by one
+4. **Verify fixes** don't introduce new errors
+
+## Common Go Errors
+
+### Import Errors
+```
+imported and not used: "package"
+```
+**Fix**: Remove unused import or use `_` prefix
+
+### Type Errors
+```
+cannot use x (type T) as type U
+```
+**Fix**: Add type conversion or fix type definition
+
+### Undefined Errors
+```
+undefined: identifier
+```
+**Fix**: Import package, define variable, or fix typo
+
+### Vet Errors
+```
+printf: call has arguments but no formatting directives
+```
+**Fix**: Add format directive or remove arguments
+
+## Fix Order
+
+1. **Import errors** - Fix or remove imports
+2. **Type definitions** - Ensure types exist
+3. **Function signatures** - Match parameters
+4. **Vet warnings** - Address static analysis
+
+## Build Commands
+
+```bash
+# Build all packages
+go build ./...
+
+# Build with race detector
+go build -race ./...
+
+# Build for specific OS/arch
+GOOS=linux GOARCH=amd64 go build ./...
+
+# Run go vet
+go vet ./...
+
+# Run staticcheck
+staticcheck ./...
+
+# Format code
+gofmt -w .
+
+# Tidy dependencies
+go mod tidy
+```
+
+## Verification
+
+After fixes:
+```bash
+go build ./...    # Should succeed
+go vet ./...      # Should have no warnings
+go test ./...     # Tests should pass
+```
+
+---
+
+**IMPORTANT**: Fix errors only. No refactoring, no improvements. Get the build green with minimal changes.

package/.opencode/commands/go-review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+---
+description: Go code review for idiomatic patterns
+agent: go-reviewer
+subtask: true
+---
+
+# Go Review Command
+
+Review Go code for idiomatic patterns and best practices: $ARGUMENTS
+
+## Your Task
+
+1. **Analyze Go code** for idioms and patterns
+2. **Check concurrency** - goroutines, channels, mutexes
+3. **Review error handling** - proper error wrapping
+4. **Verify performance** - allocations, bottlenecks
+
+## Review Checklist
+
+### Idiomatic Go
+- [ ] Package naming (lowercase, no underscores)
+- [ ] Variable naming (camelCase, short)
+- [ ] Interface naming (ends with -er)
+- [ ] Error naming (starts with Err)
+
+### Error Handling
+- [ ] Errors are checked, not ignored
+- [ ] Errors wrapped with context (`fmt.Errorf("...: %w", err)`)
+- [ ] Sentinel errors used appropriately
+- [ ] Custom error types when needed
+
+### Concurrency
+- [ ] Goroutines properly managed
+- [ ] Channels buffered appropriately
+- [ ] No data races (use `-race` flag)
+- [ ] Context passed for cancellation
+- [ ] WaitGroups used correctly
+
+### Performance
+- [ ] Avoid unnecessary allocations
+- [ ] Use `sync.Pool` for frequent allocations
+- [ ] Prefer value receivers for small structs
+- [ ] Buffer I/O operations
+
+### Code Organization
+- [ ] Small, focused packages
+- [ ] Clear dependency direction
+- [ ] Internal packages for private code
+- [ ] Godoc comments on exports
+
+## Report Format
+
+### Idiomatic Issues
+- [file:line] Issue description
+  Suggestion: How to fix
+
+### Error Handling Issues
+- [file:line] Issue description
+  Suggestion: How to fix
+
+### Concurrency Issues
+- [file:line] Issue description
+  Suggestion: How to fix
+
+### Performance Issues
+- [file:line] Issue description
+  Suggestion: How to fix
+
+---
+
+**TIP**: Run `go vet` and `staticcheck` for additional automated checks.

package/.opencode/commands/go-test.md

@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+---
+description: Go TDD workflow with table-driven tests
+agent: tdd-guide
+subtask: true
+---
+
+# Go Test Command
+
+Implement using Go TDD methodology: $ARGUMENTS
+
+## Your Task
+
+Apply test-driven development with Go idioms:
+
+1. **Define types** - Interfaces and structs
+2. **Write table-driven tests** - Comprehensive coverage
+3. **Implement minimal code** - Pass the tests
+4. **Benchmark** - Verify performance
+
+## TDD Cycle for Go
+
+### Step 1: Define Interface
+```go
+type Calculator interface {
+    Calculate(input Input) (Output, error)
+}
+
+type Input struct {
+    // fields
+}
+
+type Output struct {
+    // fields
+}
+```
+
+### Step 2: Table-Driven Tests
+```go
+func TestCalculate(t *testing.T) {
+    tests := []struct {
+        name    string
+        input   Input
+        want    Output
+        wantErr bool
+    }{
+        {
+            name:  "valid input",
+            input: Input{...},
+            want:  Output{...},
+        },
+        {
+            name:    "invalid input",
+            input:   Input{...},
+            wantErr: true,
+        },
+    }
+
+    for _, tt := range tests {
+        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+            got, err := Calculate(tt.input)
+            if (err != nil) != tt.wantErr {
+                t.Errorf("Calculate() error = %v, wantErr %v", err, tt.wantErr)
+                return
+            }
+            if !reflect.DeepEqual(got, tt.want) {
+                t.Errorf("Calculate() = %v, want %v", got, tt.want)
+            }
+        })
+    }
+}
+```
+
+### Step 3: Run Tests (RED)
+```bash
+go test -v ./...
+```
+
+### Step 4: Implement (GREEN)
+```go
+func Calculate(input Input) (Output, error) {
+    // Minimal implementation
+}
+```
+
+### Step 5: Benchmark
+```go
+func BenchmarkCalculate(b *testing.B) {
+    input := Input{...}
+    for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
+        Calculate(input)
+    }
+}
+```
+
+## Go Testing Commands
+
+```bash
+# Run all tests
+go test ./...
+
+# Run with verbose output
+go test -v ./...
+
+# Run with coverage
+go test -cover ./...
+
+# Run with race detector
+go test -race ./...
+
+# Run benchmarks
+go test -bench=. ./...
+
+# Generate coverage report
+go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...
+go tool cover -html=coverage.out
+```
+
+## Test File Organization
+
+```
+package/
+├── calculator.go       # Implementation
+├── calculator_test.go  # Tests
+├── testdata/           # Test fixtures
+│   └── input.json
+└── mock_test.go        # Mock implementations
+```
+
+---
+
+**TIP**: Use `testify/assert` for cleaner assertions, or stick with stdlib for simplicity.

package/.opencode/commands/harness-audit.md

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+# Harness Audit Command
+
+Run a deterministic repository harness audit and return a prioritized scorecard.
+
+## Usage
+
+`/harness-audit [scope] [--format text|json]`
+
+- `scope` (optional): `repo` (default), `hooks`, `skills`, `commands`, `agents`
+- `--format`: output style (`text` default, `json` for automation)
+
+## Deterministic Engine
+
+Always run:
+
+```bash
+node scripts/harness-audit.js <scope> --format <text|json>
+```
+
+This script is the source of truth for scoring and checks. Do not invent additional dimensions or ad-hoc points.
+
+Rubric version: `2026-03-16`.
+
+The script computes 7 fixed categories (`0-10` normalized each):
+
+1. Tool Coverage
+2. Context Efficiency
+3. Quality Gates
+4. Memory Persistence
+5. Eval Coverage
+6. Security Guardrails
+7. Cost Efficiency
+
+Scores are derived from explicit file/rule checks and are reproducible for the same commit.
+
+## Output Contract
+
+Return:
+
+1. `overall_score` out of `max_score` (70 for `repo`; smaller for scoped audits)
+2. Category scores and concrete findings
+3. Failed checks with exact file paths
+4. Top 3 actions from the deterministic output (`top_actions`)
+5. Suggested ECC skills to apply next
+
+## Checklist
+
+- Use script output directly; do not rescore manually.
+- If `--format json` is requested, return the script JSON unchanged.
+- If text is requested, summarize failing checks and top actions.
+- Include exact file paths from `checks[]` and `top_actions[]`.
+
+## Example Result
+
+```text
+Harness Audit (repo): 66/70
+- Tool Coverage: 10/10 (10/10 pts)
+- Context Efficiency: 9/10 (9/10 pts)
+- Quality Gates: 10/10 (10/10 pts)
+
+Top 3 Actions:
+1) [Security Guardrails] Add prompt/tool preflight security guards in hooks/hooks.json. (hooks/hooks.json)
+2) [Tool Coverage] Sync commands/harness-audit.md and .opencode/commands/harness-audit.md. (.opencode/commands/harness-audit.md)
+3) [Eval Coverage] Increase automated test coverage across scripts/hooks/lib. (tests/)
+```
+
+## Arguments
+
+$ARGUMENTS:
+- `repo|hooks|skills|commands|agents` (optional scope)
+- `--format text|json` (optional output format)