aiox-core 5.0.3 → 5.0.4

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/test-cases/BATCH-PROGRESS.md

@@ -1,268 +1,268 @@
-# Model Tier Qualification - Batch Progress
-
-**Session:** 2026-02-11
-**Orchestrator:** @pedro-valerio
-
----
-
-## Wave 1: Haiku High-Confidence Candidates
-
-| # | Task | Status | Opus | Haiku | Decision |
-|---|------|--------|------|-------|----------|
-| 1 | pv-axioma-assessment | ✅ DONE | 7.85 | 7.77 (95.5%) | **HAIKU QUALIFIED** |
-| 2 | pv-modernization-score | ✅ DONE | 2/12 | Script-only | **SCRIPT QUALIFIED** (100% deterministic) |
-| 3 | validate-squad | ✅ DONE | 7.89 PASS | 7.89 PASS (re-test) | **HAIKU QUALIFIED** (expert_override 91%) |
-| 4 | qa-after-creation | ✅ DONE | 8.32 APPROVED | 9.9 APPROVED (+19%) | **HAIKU QUALIFIED*** |
-| 5 | an-fidelity-score | ✅ DONE | 82.22% V2.0 | 81.67% V2.0 (99.3%) | **HAIKU QUALIFIED** |
-| 6 | an-clone-review | ✅ DONE | Trinity 93.3% SOLID | Trinity 93.3% v2.2.0 | **HAIKU QUALIFIED** (scope fix applied) |
-| 7 | an-diagnose-clone | ✅ DONE | 85% BOM | 30% CRITICO (v2.0.0 fix failed) | **OPUS REQUIRED** (Haiku can't read files accurately) |
-| 8 | an-validate-clone | ✅ DONE | 73.89% REVIEW | 90% AUTH v2.2.0 | **HAIKU QUALIFIED** (strict rules applied) |
-| 9 | an-assess-sources | ✅ DONE | 4.15 (3 CJ) | 4.35 (3 CJ) v2.2.2 | **HAIKU QUALIFIED** (100% tier, 4.2% variance, evolucao fix) |
-
----
-
-## Wave 2: Admin Tasks
-
-| # | Task | Status | Type | Decision |
-|---|------|--------|------|----------|
-| 1 | refresh-registry | ✅ PRE-QUALIFIED | Hybrid (Script 80%) | **HAIKU** - Script counts, LLM enriches |
-| 2 | squad-analytics | ✅ PRE-QUALIFIED | Hybrid (Script 80%) | **HAIKU** - Script metrics, LLM interprets |
-| 3 | migrate-workflows-to-yaml | ⏸️ DEPRECATED | - | One-time task (completed 2026-02-05) |
-| 4 | install-commands | ✅ PRE-QUALIFIED | Worker (100%) | **SCRIPT** - 0 tokens, file operations only |
-| 5 | sync-ide-command | ✅ PRE-QUALIFIED | Worker (100%) | **SCRIPT** - 0 tokens, file operations only |
-
----
-
-## Patterns Discovered
-
-### OPUS REQUIRED Pattern
-Tasks that require:
-- Multi-signal classification (type detection)
-- Interpretive judgment (spirit vs letter)
-- Cascading decisions (type → checks → scores)
-
-Examples: `pv-modernization-score`, `validate-squad`
-
-### HAIKU ELIGIBLE Pattern
-Tasks that are:
-- Formula-based scoring with defined weights
-- Checklist validation with binary criteria
-- No interpretation required
-
-Example: `pv-axioma-assessment`
-
----
-
-## Current Stats
-
-- **Tested:** 10 tasks (Wave 1 complete)
-- **Pre-Qualified:** 4 tasks (Wave 2 - script-first/worker)
-- **Haiku/Script Qualified:** 12 (86%)
-  - Wave 1: pv-axioma-assessment, qa-after-creation*, an-fidelity-score→script, an-assess-sources (v2.2.2)
-  - Wave 1 (fixed): pv-modernization-score→script, validate-squad, an-clone-review (v2.2.0), an-validate-clone (v2.2.0)
-  - Wave 2: refresh-registry, squad-analytics, install-commands, sync-ide-command
-- **Opus Required:** 1 (7%) - an-diagnose-clone (tested, fix attempted, OPUS CONFIRMED)
-- **Deprecated:** 1 (7%) - migrate-workflows-to-yaml
-- **Pending:** 0 tasks
-
-*\*an-diagnose-clone: Fix v2.0.0 attempted with CHECKPOINT CLARIFICATIONS but Haiku simulates file reads instead of analyzing accurately (30% vs Opus 85%)*
-
-*\*qa-after-creation: Haiku qualified with caveat (score inflation +19%, same pass/fail decision)*
-
----
-
-## KEY DISCOVERY #2: Script-First Architecture
-
-**fidelity-score.sh** provou que 95% do fidelity scoring pode ser SCRIPT puro:
-
-| Approach | Tokens | Time | Accuracy |
-|----------|--------|------|----------|
-| LLM (Opus) | ~5000 | ~60s | baseline |
-| LLM (Haiku) | ~2000 | ~20s | 99.3% |
-| **Script** | **0** | **<1s** | 100% (deterministic) |
-
-**Script faz:**
-- grep section exists
-- count items in YAML
-- calculate weighted score
-- classify by thresholds
-
-**LLM faz (só o necessário):**
-- Gap analysis (recommendations)
-- Hackability testing (interaction)
-- Type detection (multi-signal)
-
-**Localização:** `squads/squad-creator-pro/scripts/fidelity-score.sh`
-
----
-
-## KEY DISCOVERY #1: Binary Checkpoint Conversion
-
-**an-fidelity-score v2.0** provou que converter scoring subjetivo (1-5) para checkpoints binários (0-5 count) permite Haiku atingir **99.3%** da qualidade Opus!
-
-| Padrão | Antes | Depois |
-|--------|-------|--------|
-| Scoring | "Avaliar 1-5" | "Contar checkpoints passed" |
-| Haiku result | Sub/over-scoring | 99.3% match |
-| Root cause | Julgamento | Contagem |
-
-**Aplicar em:** an-clone-review, an-diagnose-clone, an-validate-clone, pv-audit
-
----
-
-## New Pattern: GATEKEEPER Tasks
-
-Tasks whose primary purpose is **binary pass/fail decision** (not precise scoring) are Haiku-eligible even with score differences, as long as the final decision matches.
-
-Examples: `qa-after-creation`, `security-scan`, `validate-extraction`
-
----
-
----
-
-## KEY DISCOVERY #4: Bidirectional Scoring Bias
-
-**an-validate-clone** revelou que Haiku pode ser MAIS GENEROSO que Opus:
-
-| Dimension | Opus | Haiku | Δ |
-|-----------|------|-------|---|
-| Fidelity | 73.89% | 88.3% | +14.4% (Haiku generous) |
-| Hackability | 4/4 | 4/4 | = |
-| Authenticity | 70% | 100% | +30% (Haiku generous) |
-| Verdict | REVIEW | PASS PREMIUM | ❌ |
-
-**Padrão bidireicional:**
-- an-clone-review: Haiku CONSERVADOR (73% vs Opus 93%)
-- an-validate-clone: Haiku GENEROSO (88% vs Opus 74%)
-
-**Root cause:** Scoring calibration não é consistente entre modelos.
-
-**Implicação:** Tasks com scoring subjetivo (mesmo com checkpoints) podem divergir em AMBAS direções.
-
----
-
-## KEY DISCOVERY #3: Scope Interpretation
-
-**an-clone-review** revelou que Haiku interpreta escopo LITERALMENTE:
-
-| Aspect | Opus | Haiku |
-|--------|------|-------|
-| Scope | Wrapper + delegated persona | Wrapper only |
-| Swipe File | 4/5 (found in persona) | 1/5 (wrapper empty) |
-| Verdict | SOLID | NEEDS_WORK |
-
-**Fix:** Tasks devem especificar escopo explicitamente:
-- "Review clone file AND referenced persona files"
-- "Include delegated content in scope"
-
----
-
----
-
-## KEY DISCOVERY #5: Iterative Task Refinement Works!
-
-**an-assess-sources** demonstrou que tasks podem ser refinadas iterativamente para Haiku:
-
-| Version | Fix Applied | Tier Match |
-|---------|-------------|------------|
-| v2.0 | Binary Checkpoints | 25% |
-| v2.1 | + Scope Definition | 75% |
-| **v2.2.1** | + No Override Rule | **100%** ✅ |
-
-**3 Fixes Necessários:**
-1. **Binary Checkpoints** - elimina variance de scoring subjetivo
-2. **Scope Definition** - define granularidade explícita (1 livro = 1 fonte)
-3. **No Override Rule** - tier é MECÂNICO, não interpretativo
-
-**Padrão Replicável:**
-```yaml
-task_haiku_readiness_checklist:
-  - "Scoring é binário (true/false)?"
-  - "Escopo está explicitamente definido?"
-  - "Classificação é mecânica (sem override subjetivo)?"
-```
-
-**Candidatos para mesmo tratamento:** ~~an-clone-review, an-validate-clone~~ DONE - v2.2.0 fixes applied and validated.
-
----
-
-## KEY DISCOVERY #6: Formal Evaluation Methodology
-
-**an-compare-outputs v1.0.0** estabeleceu metodologia formal de comparação:
-
-| Dimension | Weight | Threshold |
-|-----------|--------|-----------|
-| Tier Match | 40% | <90% = review, <75% = veto |
-| Score Variance | 30% | >15% = review, >25% = veto |
-| Checkpoint Match | 20% | - |
-| Recommendation Quality | 10% | Contradictory = veto |
-
-**Resultado an-assess-sources:**
-- Tier Match: 100% (40/40) ✅
-- Score Variance: 25% (0/30) ⚠️ - at threshold
-- Checkpoint Match: 99% (16/20) ✅
-- Recommendations: Similar (7/10) ✅
-- **Total: 63/100 → CONDITIONAL**
-
-**Root cause da variance:** Checkpoint "evolucao" ambíguo.
-
-**Fix aplicado (v2.2.2):**
-```yaml
-evolucao_rule:
-  first_work_rule: "SE é a primeira obra → evolucao = FALSE (sem baseline)"
-```
-
-**Re-teste v2.2.2:**
-- Checkpoint "evolucao" match: 100% (antes 75%)
-- Max score variance: 4.2% (antes 25%)
-- Veto triggered: NÃO (antes SIM)
-- **Status: HAIKU QUALIFIED**
-
-**Localização:** `squads/squad-creator-pro/tasks/an-compare-outputs.md`
-
----
-
-## KEY DISCOVERY #7: Iterative Fix Pattern
-
-**an-assess-sources** demonstrou o padrão completo de qualificação:
-
-| Version | Fix | Checkpoint Match | Score Variance | Status |
-|---------|-----|------------------|----------------|--------|
-| v2.0 | Binary Checkpoints | 25% | >30% | FAIL |
-| v2.1 | + Scope Definition | 75% | ~20% | CONDITIONAL |
-| v2.2.1 | + No Override Rule | 99% | 25% | CONDITIONAL |
-| **v2.2.2** | + Evolucao Clarified | **100%** | **4.2%** | **QUALIFIED** |
-
-**Padrão replicável para outros tasks:**
-1. Identificar checkpoint com variance
-2. Clarificar definição com regra explícita (SE/ENTÃO)
-3. Re-testar com Haiku
-4. Validar match rate
-
----
-
-## KEY DISCOVERY #8: Fix Pattern Replicates
-
-**4 tasks fixadas com o mesmo padrão:**
-
-| Task | Root Cause | Fix Applied | Result |
-|------|-----------|-------------|--------|
-| an-assess-sources | Checkpoint "evolucao" ambíguo | evolucao_rule clarified | 25%→4.2% variance |
-| an-clone-review | Scope interpretation | SCOPE DEFINITION added | 73%→93% Trinity |
-| an-validate-clone | Haiku generous | CHECKPOINT CLARIFICATIONS | Strict rules, no inference |
-| validate-squad | Type detection | Already had dominant signals | 91% voice_dna → expert |
-
-**Padrão de Fix:**
-1. Identificar checkpoint/regra com variance
-2. Adicionar seção EXPLÍCITA com regras SE/ENTÃO
-3. Especificar "NO INFERENCE" onde aplicável
-4. Re-testar com Haiku
-
-**Estimativa de economia atualizada:**
-- Before: 100% Opus
-- After: **86% Haiku/Script** + 7% Opus + 7% deprecated
-- Estimated savings: **60-70% token cost reduction**
-
----
-
-*Last updated: 2026-02-11 19:45*
+# Model Tier Qualification - Batch Progress
+
+**Session:** 2026-02-11
+**Orchestrator:** @pedro-valerio
+
+---
+
+## Wave 1: Haiku High-Confidence Candidates
+
+| # | Task | Status | Opus | Haiku | Decision |
+|---|------|--------|------|-------|----------|
+| 1 | pv-axioma-assessment | ✅ DONE | 7.85 | 7.77 (95.5%) | **HAIKU QUALIFIED** |
+| 2 | pv-modernization-score | ✅ DONE | 2/12 | Script-only | **SCRIPT QUALIFIED** (100% deterministic) |
+| 3 | validate-squad | ✅ DONE | 7.89 PASS | 7.89 PASS (re-test) | **HAIKU QUALIFIED** (expert_override 91%) |
+| 4 | qa-after-creation | ✅ DONE | 8.32 APPROVED | 9.9 APPROVED (+19%) | **HAIKU QUALIFIED*** |
+| 5 | an-fidelity-score | ✅ DONE | 82.22% V2.0 | 81.67% V2.0 (99.3%) | **HAIKU QUALIFIED** |
+| 6 | an-clone-review | ✅ DONE | Trinity 93.3% SOLID | Trinity 93.3% v2.2.0 | **HAIKU QUALIFIED** (scope fix applied) |
+| 7 | an-diagnose-clone | ✅ DONE | 85% BOM | 30% CRITICO (v2.0.0 fix failed) | **OPUS REQUIRED** (Haiku can't read files accurately) |
+| 8 | an-validate-clone | ✅ DONE | 73.89% REVIEW | 90% AUTH v2.2.0 | **HAIKU QUALIFIED** (strict rules applied) |
+| 9 | an-assess-sources | ✅ DONE | 4.15 (3 CJ) | 4.35 (3 CJ) v2.2.2 | **HAIKU QUALIFIED** (100% tier, 4.2% variance, evolucao fix) |
+
+---
+
+## Wave 2: Admin Tasks
+
+| # | Task | Status | Type | Decision |
+|---|------|--------|------|----------|
+| 1 | refresh-registry | ✅ PRE-QUALIFIED | Hybrid (Script 80%) | **HAIKU** - Script counts, LLM enriches |
+| 2 | squad-analytics | ✅ PRE-QUALIFIED | Hybrid (Script 80%) | **HAIKU** - Script metrics, LLM interprets |
+| 3 | migrate-workflows-to-yaml | ⏸️ DEPRECATED | - | One-time task (completed 2026-02-05) |
+| 4 | install-commands | ✅ PRE-QUALIFIED | Worker (100%) | **SCRIPT** - 0 tokens, file operations only |
+| 5 | sync-ide-command | ✅ PRE-QUALIFIED | Worker (100%) | **SCRIPT** - 0 tokens, file operations only |
+
+---
+
+## Patterns Discovered
+
+### OPUS REQUIRED Pattern
+Tasks that require:
+- Multi-signal classification (type detection)
+- Interpretive judgment (spirit vs letter)
+- Cascading decisions (type → checks → scores)
+
+Examples: `pv-modernization-score`, `validate-squad`
+
+### HAIKU ELIGIBLE Pattern
+Tasks that are:
+- Formula-based scoring with defined weights
+- Checklist validation with binary criteria
+- No interpretation required
+
+Example: `pv-axioma-assessment`
+
+---
+
+## Current Stats
+
+- **Tested:** 10 tasks (Wave 1 complete)
+- **Pre-Qualified:** 4 tasks (Wave 2 - script-first/worker)
+- **Haiku/Script Qualified:** 12 (86%)
+  - Wave 1: pv-axioma-assessment, qa-after-creation*, an-fidelity-score→script, an-assess-sources (v2.2.2)
+  - Wave 1 (fixed): pv-modernization-score→script, validate-squad, an-clone-review (v2.2.0), an-validate-clone (v2.2.0)
+  - Wave 2: refresh-registry, squad-analytics, install-commands, sync-ide-command
+- **Opus Required:** 1 (7%) - an-diagnose-clone (tested, fix attempted, OPUS CONFIRMED)
+- **Deprecated:** 1 (7%) - migrate-workflows-to-yaml
+- **Pending:** 0 tasks
+
+*\*an-diagnose-clone: Fix v2.0.0 attempted with CHECKPOINT CLARIFICATIONS but Haiku simulates file reads instead of analyzing accurately (30% vs Opus 85%)*
+
+*\*qa-after-creation: Haiku qualified with caveat (score inflation +19%, same pass/fail decision)*
+
+---
+
+## KEY DISCOVERY #2: Script-First Architecture
+
+**fidelity-score.sh** provou que 95% do fidelity scoring pode ser SCRIPT puro:
+
+| Approach | Tokens | Time | Accuracy |
+|----------|--------|------|----------|
+| LLM (Opus) | ~5000 | ~60s | baseline |
+| LLM (Haiku) | ~2000 | ~20s | 99.3% |
+| **Script** | **0** | **<1s** | 100% (deterministic) |
+
+**Script faz:**
+- grep section exists
+- count items in YAML
+- calculate weighted score
+- classify by thresholds
+
+**LLM faz (só o necessário):**
+- Gap analysis (recommendations)
+- Hackability testing (interaction)
+- Type detection (multi-signal)
+
+**Localização:** `squads/squad-creator-pro/scripts/fidelity-score.sh`
+
+---
+
+## KEY DISCOVERY #1: Binary Checkpoint Conversion
+
+**an-fidelity-score v2.0** provou que converter scoring subjetivo (1-5) para checkpoints binários (0-5 count) permite Haiku atingir **99.3%** da qualidade Opus!
+
+| Padrão | Antes | Depois |
+|--------|-------|--------|
+| Scoring | "Avaliar 1-5" | "Contar checkpoints passed" |
+| Haiku result | Sub/over-scoring | 99.3% match |
+| Root cause | Julgamento | Contagem |
+
+**Aplicar em:** an-clone-review, an-diagnose-clone, an-validate-clone, pv-audit
+
+---
+
+## New Pattern: GATEKEEPER Tasks
+
+Tasks whose primary purpose is **binary pass/fail decision** (not precise scoring) are Haiku-eligible even with score differences, as long as the final decision matches.
+
+Examples: `qa-after-creation`, `security-scan`, `validate-extraction`
+
+---
+
+---
+
+## KEY DISCOVERY #4: Bidirectional Scoring Bias
+
+**an-validate-clone** revelou que Haiku pode ser MAIS GENEROSO que Opus:
+
+| Dimension | Opus | Haiku | Δ |
+|-----------|------|-------|---|
+| Fidelity | 73.89% | 88.3% | +14.4% (Haiku generous) |
+| Hackability | 4/4 | 4/4 | = |
+| Authenticity | 70% | 100% | +30% (Haiku generous) |
+| Verdict | REVIEW | PASS PREMIUM | ❌ |
+
+**Padrão bidireicional:**
+- an-clone-review: Haiku CONSERVADOR (73% vs Opus 93%)
+- an-validate-clone: Haiku GENEROSO (88% vs Opus 74%)
+
+**Root cause:** Scoring calibration não é consistente entre modelos.
+
+**Implicação:** Tasks com scoring subjetivo (mesmo com checkpoints) podem divergir em AMBAS direções.
+
+---
+
+## KEY DISCOVERY #3: Scope Interpretation
+
+**an-clone-review** revelou que Haiku interpreta escopo LITERALMENTE:
+
+| Aspect | Opus | Haiku |
+|--------|------|-------|
+| Scope | Wrapper + delegated persona | Wrapper only |
+| Swipe File | 4/5 (found in persona) | 1/5 (wrapper empty) |
+| Verdict | SOLID | NEEDS_WORK |
+
+**Fix:** Tasks devem especificar escopo explicitamente:
+- "Review clone file AND referenced persona files"
+- "Include delegated content in scope"
+
+---
+
+---
+
+## KEY DISCOVERY #5: Iterative Task Refinement Works!
+
+**an-assess-sources** demonstrou que tasks podem ser refinadas iterativamente para Haiku:
+
+| Version | Fix Applied | Tier Match |
+|---------|-------------|------------|
+| v2.0 | Binary Checkpoints | 25% |
+| v2.1 | + Scope Definition | 75% |
+| **v2.2.1** | + No Override Rule | **100%** ✅ |
+
+**3 Fixes Necessários:**
+1. **Binary Checkpoints** - elimina variance de scoring subjetivo
+2. **Scope Definition** - define granularidade explícita (1 livro = 1 fonte)
+3. **No Override Rule** - tier é MECÂNICO, não interpretativo
+
+**Padrão Replicável:**
+```yaml
+task_haiku_readiness_checklist:
+  - "Scoring é binário (true/false)?"
+  - "Escopo está explicitamente definido?"
+  - "Classificação é mecânica (sem override subjetivo)?"
+```
+
+**Candidatos para mesmo tratamento:** ~~an-clone-review, an-validate-clone~~ DONE - v2.2.0 fixes applied and validated.
+
+---
+
+## KEY DISCOVERY #6: Formal Evaluation Methodology
+
+**an-compare-outputs v1.0.0** estabeleceu metodologia formal de comparação:
+
+| Dimension | Weight | Threshold |
+|-----------|--------|-----------|
+| Tier Match | 40% | <90% = review, <75% = veto |
+| Score Variance | 30% | >15% = review, >25% = veto |
+| Checkpoint Match | 20% | - |
+| Recommendation Quality | 10% | Contradictory = veto |
+
+**Resultado an-assess-sources:**
+- Tier Match: 100% (40/40) ✅
+- Score Variance: 25% (0/30) ⚠️ - at threshold
+- Checkpoint Match: 99% (16/20) ✅
+- Recommendations: Similar (7/10) ✅
+- **Total: 63/100 → CONDITIONAL**
+
+**Root cause da variance:** Checkpoint "evolucao" ambíguo.
+
+**Fix aplicado (v2.2.2):**
+```yaml
+evolucao_rule:
+  first_work_rule: "SE é a primeira obra → evolucao = FALSE (sem baseline)"
+```
+
+**Re-teste v2.2.2:**
+- Checkpoint "evolucao" match: 100% (antes 75%)
+- Max score variance: 4.2% (antes 25%)
+- Veto triggered: NÃO (antes SIM)
+- **Status: HAIKU QUALIFIED**
+
+**Localização:** `squads/squad-creator-pro/tasks/an-compare-outputs.md`
+
+---
+
+## KEY DISCOVERY #7: Iterative Fix Pattern
+
+**an-assess-sources** demonstrou o padrão completo de qualificação:
+
+| Version | Fix | Checkpoint Match | Score Variance | Status |
+|---------|-----|------------------|----------------|--------|
+| v2.0 | Binary Checkpoints | 25% | >30% | FAIL |
+| v2.1 | + Scope Definition | 75% | ~20% | CONDITIONAL |
+| v2.2.1 | + No Override Rule | 99% | 25% | CONDITIONAL |
+| **v2.2.2** | + Evolucao Clarified | **100%** | **4.2%** | **QUALIFIED** |
+
+**Padrão replicável para outros tasks:**
+1. Identificar checkpoint com variance
+2. Clarificar definição com regra explícita (SE/ENTÃO)
+3. Re-testar com Haiku
+4. Validar match rate
+
+---
+
+## KEY DISCOVERY #8: Fix Pattern Replicates
+
+**4 tasks fixadas com o mesmo padrão:**
+
+| Task | Root Cause | Fix Applied | Result |
+|------|-----------|-------------|--------|
+| an-assess-sources | Checkpoint "evolucao" ambíguo | evolucao_rule clarified | 25%→4.2% variance |
+| an-clone-review | Scope interpretation | SCOPE DEFINITION added | 73%→93% Trinity |
+| an-validate-clone | Haiku generous | CHECKPOINT CLARIFICATIONS | Strict rules, no inference |
+| validate-squad | Type detection | Already had dominant signals | 91% voice_dna → expert |
+
+**Padrão de Fix:**
+1. Identificar checkpoint/regra com variance
+2. Adicionar seção EXPLÍCITA com regras SE/ENTÃO
+3. Especificar "NO INFERENCE" onde aplicável
+4. Re-testar com Haiku
+
+**Estimativa de economia atualizada:**
+- Before: 100% Opus
+- After: **86% Haiku/Script** + 7% Opus + 7% deprecated
+- Estimated savings: **60-70% token cost reduction**
+
+---
+
+*Last updated: 2026-02-11 19:45*

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/test-cases/QUALIFICATION-DASHBOARD.yaml

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
-qualification_dashboard:
-  generated_at: null
-  workflow: "wf-model-tier-qualification"
-  status: "not_generated"
-  summary:
-    total_tested: 0
-    haiku_qualified: 0
-    sonnet_qualified: 0
-    opus_required: 0
-    total_savings_projected: "0%"
-  results: []
-  next_actions:
-    - "Run qualification workflow to populate this dashboard."
+qualification_dashboard:
+  generated_at: null
+  workflow: "wf-model-tier-qualification"
+  status: "not_generated"
+  summary:
+    total_tested: 0
+    haiku_qualified: 0
+    sonnet_qualified: 0
+    opus_required: 0
+    total_savings_projected: "0%"
+  results: []
+  next_actions:
+    - "Run qualification workflow to populate this dashboard."