agentsys 5.0.0

package/plugins/ship/commands/ship-ci-review-loop.md

@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+---
+description: "Use when monitoring CI and handling review comments during /ship. Details mandatory wait periods, auto-reviewer handling, and comment resolution."
+codex-description: "Use when monitoring CI and handling review comments during /ship. Details mandatory wait periods, auto-reviewer handling, and comment resolution."
+---
+
+<ci-review-loop>
+# Phase 4: CI & Review Monitor Loop - Reference
+
+This file contains detailed implementation for the CI & Review Monitor Loop phase of `/ship`.
+
+**Parent document**: `ship.md`
+
+---
+
+<mandatory-requirements>
+## This Phase Is Mandatory
+
+This is not optional. You must:
+1. Wait the full 3 minutes for auto-reviewers
+2. Run the monitor loop (not just check once)
+3. Address all comments before merge
+</mandatory-requirements>
+
+---
+
+<pr-auto-review>
+## PR Auto-Review Process
+
+PRs receive automatic reviews from configured auto-reviewers (Copilot, Gemini, CodeRabbit, etc.).
+
+**Mandatory workflow:**
+1. After PR creation, wait **at least 3 minutes** for first review round
+2. Read **all comments** from all reviewers
+3. Address **every comment** - no exceptions
+4. Iterate until **zero unresolved threads** (typically 2-4 rounds)
+
+**Rules:**
+- Always address all comments, including "minor" or "nit" suggestions
+- Do not skip a comment unless factually wrong or user-approved
+- Treat all feedback as **required changes**, not suggestions
+</pr-auto-review>
+
+---
+
+<overview>
+## Overview
+
+The monitor loop must wait for:
+1. CI to pass
+2. All comments resolved (addressed or replied to)
+3. No "changes requested" reviews remain
+
+## Why All Comments Matter
+
+**Every comment must be addressed:**
+- Critical/High issues: Fix immediately
+- Medium issues: Fix (don't defer)
+- Minor/Nit issues: Fix (shows attention to quality)
+- Style suggestions: Fix (maintains codebase consistency)
+- Questions: Answer with explanation
+- False positives: Reply explaining why, then resolve
+- Not relevant: Reply explaining why, then resolve
+
+Do not ignore comments. Do not leave comments unresolved. A clean PR has zero unresolved conversations.
+</overview>
+
+## The Monitor Loop Algorithm
+
+> **Note:** The JavaScript below is **conceptual pseudocode** showing the algorithm flow.
+> Implement using bash functions defined in this file.
+
+```javascript
+const MAX_ITERATIONS = 10;  // Safety limit
+const INITIAL_WAIT_MS = 180000;  // 3 minutes - wait for auto-reviews
+const ITERATION_WAIT_MS = 30000;  // 30 seconds between iterations
+let iteration = 0;
+
+while (iteration < MAX_ITERATIONS) {
+  iteration++;
+  console.log(`\n## CI & Review Monitor - Iteration ${iteration}`);
+
+  // Step 1: Wait for CI to complete
+  const ciStatus = await waitForCI();
+  if (ciStatus === 'failed') {
+    await fixCIFailures();
+    continue;  // Push fix, re-run CI
+  }
+
+  // Step 1.5: First iteration only - wait for auto-reviews
+  if (iteration === 1) {
+    console.log("Waiting 3 minutes for auto-reviews...");
+    await sleep(INITIAL_WAIT_MS);
+  }
+
+  // Step 2: Check for PR comments and reviews
+  const feedback = await checkPRFeedback();
+
+  if (feedback.unresolvedCount === 0 && !feedback.changesRequested) {
+    console.log("[OK] CI passed, all comments resolved");
+    break;  // Ready to merge!
+  }
+
+  // Step 3: Address ALL feedback
+  await addressAllFeedback(PR_NUMBER);
+
+  // Step 4: Push fixes
+  if (feedback.hasCodeChanges) {
+    await commitAndPush(`fix: address review feedback (iteration ${iteration})`);
+  }
+
+  // Step 5: Sleep before next check
+  await sleep(ITERATION_WAIT_MS);
+}
+```
+
+## Step 1: Wait for CI
+
+```bash
+wait_for_ci() {
+  echo "Waiting for CI checks..."
+
+  while true; do
+    CHECKS=$(gh pr checks $PR_NUMBER --json name,state 2>/dev/null || echo "[]")
+
+    PENDING=$(echo "$CHECKS" | jq '[.[] | select(.state | IN("PENDING", "QUEUED", "IN_PROGRESS"))] | length')
+    FAILED=$(echo "$CHECKS" | jq '[.[] | select(.state | IN("FAILURE", "CANCELLED"))] | length')
+    PASSED=$(echo "$CHECKS" | jq '[.[] | select(.state=="SUCCESS")] | length')
+
+    if [ "$FAILED" -gt 0 ]; then
+      echo "[ERROR] CI failed ($FAILED checks)"
+      gh pr checks $PR_NUMBER
+      return 1
+    elif [ "$PENDING" -eq 0 ] && [ "$PASSED" -gt 0 ]; then
+      echo "[OK] CI passed ($PASSED checks)"
+      return 0
+    elif [ "$PENDING" -eq 0 ] && [ "$PASSED" -eq 0 ]; then
+      echo "[WARN] No CI checks found, proceeding..."
+      return 0
+    fi
+
+    echo "  Waiting... ($PENDING pending, $PASSED passed)"
+    sleep 15
+  done
+}
+```
+
+## Step 2: Check PR Feedback
+
+```bash
+check_pr_feedback() {
+  local pr_number=$1
+
+  echo "Checking PR feedback..."
+
+  # Extract owner and repo from git remote
+  REPO_INFO=$(gh repo view --json owner,name --jq '"\(.owner.login)/\(.name)"')
+  OWNER=$(echo "$REPO_INFO" | cut -d'/' -f1)
+  REPO=$(echo "$REPO_INFO" | cut -d'/' -f2)
+
+  # Get review state
+  REVIEWS=$(gh pr view $pr_number --json reviews --jq '.reviews')
+  CHANGES_REQUESTED=$(echo "$REVIEWS" | jq '[.[] | select(.state=="CHANGES_REQUESTED")] | length')
+
+  # Get unresolved review threads
+  # NOTE: Fetches first 100 threads. For PRs with >100 threads, implement pagination.
+  UNRESOLVED_THREADS=$(gh api graphql -f query='
+    query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pr: Int!) {
+      repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) {
+        pullRequest(number: $pr) {
+          reviewThreads(first: 100) {
+            nodes {
+              isResolved
+            }
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  ' -f owner="$OWNER" -f repo="$REPO" -F pr=$pr_number \
+    --jq '[.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes[] | select(.isResolved == false)] | length')
+
+  echo "  Unresolved threads: $UNRESOLVED_THREADS"
+  echo "  Changes requested: $CHANGES_REQUESTED"
+
+  echo "{\"unresolvedThreads\": $UNRESOLVED_THREADS, \"changesRequested\": $CHANGES_REQUESTED}"
+}
+```
+
+### Get Full Thread Details
+
+```bash
+get_unresolved_threads() {
+  local pr_number=$1
+
+  REPO_INFO=$(gh repo view --json owner,name --jq '"\(.owner.login)/\(.name)"')
+  OWNER=$(echo "$REPO_INFO" | cut -d'/' -f1)
+  REPO=$(echo "$REPO_INFO" | cut -d'/' -f2)
+
+  # NOTE: Fetches first 100 threads. For PRs with >100, implement pagination.
+  gh api graphql -f query='
+    query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pr: Int!) {
+      repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) {
+        pullRequest(number: $pr) {
+          reviewThreads(first: 100) {
+            nodes {
+              id
+              isResolved
+              path
+              line
+              diffHunk
+              comments(first: 1) {
+                nodes {
+                  id
+                  body
+                }
+              }
+            }
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  ' -f owner="$OWNER" -f repo="$REPO" -F pr=$pr_number \
+    --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes[] | select(.isResolved == false)'
+}
+```
+
+## Step 3: Address ALL Feedback
+
+> **Note:** This is **conceptual pseudocode** showing the algorithm flow.
+> Implement using: gh api, Read, Edit, Task (ci-fixer), etc.
+
+```javascript
+async function addressAllFeedback(prNumber) {
+  const threads = await getUnresolvedThreads(prNumber);
+
+  console.log(`\nAddressing ${threads.length} unresolved threads...`);
+
+  for (const thread of threads) {
+    console.log(`\n--- Thread: ${thread.path}:${thread.line} ---`);
+    const analysis = analyzeComment(thread);
+
+    switch (analysis.type) {
+      case 'code_fix_required':
+        console.log(`Action: Fixing code issue`);
+        await implementFix(thread);  // Use Task(ci-fixer) or Edit tool
+        break;
+
+      case 'style_suggestion':
+        console.log(`Action: Applying style fix`);
+        await implementFix(thread);
+        break;
+
+      case 'question':
+        console.log(`Action: Answering question`);
+        await replyToComment(prNumber, thread.commentId, generateAnswer(thread));
+        await resolveThread(thread.id);
+        break;
+
+      case 'false_positive':
+        console.log(`Action: Explaining false positive`);
+        await replyToComment(prNumber, thread.commentId,
+          `This is a false positive because: ${analysis.reason}\n\n` +
+          `Resolving. Please reopen if you disagree.`
+        );
+        await resolveThread(thread.id);
+        break;
+
+      case 'not_relevant':
+        console.log(`Action: Explaining out of scope`);
+        await replyToComment(prNumber, thread.commentId,
+          `Outside scope of this PR: ${analysis.reason}\n\n` +
+          `Resolving. Please reopen if needed.`
+        );
+        await resolveThread(thread.id);
+        break;
+
+      case 'already_addressed':
+        console.log(`Action: Confirming addressed`);
+        await replyToComment(prNumber, thread.commentId,
+          `Addressed in commit ${gitRevParseHead}.`
+        );
+        await resolveThread(thread.id);
+        break;
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Request re-review from those who requested changes
+  const changesRequestedReviews = await getChangesRequestedReviews(prNumber);
+  for (const review of changesRequestedReviews) {
+    await requestReReview(prNumber, review.author);
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Comment Analysis Heuristics
+
+> **Note:** Classification heuristics for comment handling.
+
+```javascript
+function analyzeComment(thread) {
+  const body = thread.body.toLowerCase();
+
+  // Question patterns
+  if (body.includes('?') || body.startsWith('why') || body.startsWith('how') ||
+      body.startsWith('what') || body.startsWith('could you explain')) {
+    return { type: 'question', reason: 'Comment is a question' };
+  }
+
+  // Style/nit patterns
+  if (body.includes('nit:') || body.includes('nitpick') || body.includes('minor:') ||
+      body.includes('style:') || body.includes('consider') || body.includes('optional')) {
+    return { type: 'style_suggestion', reason: 'Style or minor suggestion' };
+  }
+
+  // Out of scope patterns
+  if (!thread.diffHunk || commentRefersToUnchangedCode(thread)) {
+    return { type: 'not_relevant', reason: 'Comment refers to unchanged code' };
+  }
+
+  // Default: treat as code fix required
+  return { type: 'code_fix_required', reason: 'Valid code feedback' };
+}
+```
+
+## Implementing Fixes
+
+Use the ci-fixer agent for code changes:
+
+```javascript
+Task({
+  subagent_type: "next-task:ci-fixer",
+  prompt: `Fix the following review comment:
+
+**File**: ${thread.path}
+**Line**: ${thread.line}
+**Comment**: ${thread.body}
+**Code Context**:
+\`\`\`
+${thread.diffHunk}
+\`\`\`
+
+Requirements:
+1. Make the minimal change to address the feedback
+2. Do NOT over-engineer or add unrelated changes
+3. Ensure tests still pass after the fix`
+});
+```
+
+## Resolving Threads
+
+```bash
+resolve_thread() {
+  local thread_id=$1
+
+  gh api graphql -f query='
+    mutation($threadId: ID!) {
+      resolveReviewThread(input: {threadId: $threadId}) {
+        thread {
+          isResolved
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  ' -f threadId="$thread_id"
+}
+
+reply_to_comment() {
+  local pr_number=$1
+  local comment_id=$2
+  local body=$3
+
+  REPO_INFO=$(gh repo view --json owner,name --jq '"\(.owner.login)/\(.name)"')
+  OWNER=$(echo "$REPO_INFO" | cut -d'/' -f1)
+  REPO=$(echo "$REPO_INFO" | cut -d'/' -f2)
+
+  gh api -X POST "repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$pr_number/comments" \
+    -f body="$body" \
+    -F in_reply_to="$comment_id"
+}
+```
+
+## Step 4: Commit and Push
+
+```bash
+commit_and_push_fixes() {
+  local message=$1
+  local branch=${2:-$(git branch --show-current)}
+
+  if [ -n "$(git status --porcelain)" ]; then
+    git add -A
+    git commit -m "$message"
+    git push origin "$branch"
+    echo "[OK] Pushed fixes"
+    return 0
+  else
+    echo "No code changes to commit (only comment replies)"
+    return 1
+  fi
+}
+```
+
+## Complete Loop Script
+
+```bash
+#!/bin/bash
+# Phase 4: CI & Review Monitor Loop
+
+MAX_ITERATIONS=10
+INITIAL_WAIT=${SHIP_INITIAL_WAIT:-180}  # Configurable via env var
+ITERATION_WAIT=30
+iteration=0
+
+while [ $iteration -lt $MAX_ITERATIONS ]; do
+  iteration=$((iteration + 1))
+  echo "[CI Monitor] Iteration $iteration"
+
+  # Step 1: Wait for CI
+  if ! wait_for_ci; then
+    echo "CI failed - launching ci-fixer agent..."
+    continue
+  fi
+
+  # Step 1.5: First iteration - wait for auto-reviews
+  if [ $iteration -eq 1 ] && [ "$INITIAL_WAIT" -gt 0 ]; then
+    echo "First iteration - waiting ${INITIAL_WAIT}s for auto-reviews..."
+    sleep $INITIAL_WAIT
+  fi
+
+  # Step 2: Check feedback
+  FEEDBACK=$(check_pr_feedback $PR_NUMBER)
+  UNRESOLVED=$(echo "$FEEDBACK" | jq -r '.unresolvedThreads')
+  CHANGES_REQ=$(echo "$FEEDBACK" | jq -r '.changesRequested')
+
+  if [ "$UNRESOLVED" -eq 0 ] && [ "$CHANGES_REQ" -eq 0 ]; then
+    echo "[OK] ALL CHECKS PASSED"
+    echo "[OK] ALL COMMENTS RESOLVED"
+    echo "Ready to merge!"
+    break
+  fi
+
+  # Step 3: Address all feedback
+  echo "Addressing $UNRESOLVED unresolved threads..."
+
+  # Step 4: Commit and push
+  commit_and_push_fixes "fix: address review feedback (iteration $iteration)"
+
+  # Step 5: Wait before next iteration
+  echo "Waiting ${ITERATION_WAIT}s..."
+  sleep $ITERATION_WAIT
+done
+
+if [ $iteration -ge $MAX_ITERATIONS ]; then
+  echo "[ERROR] Max iterations reached - manual intervention required"
+  exit 1
+fi
+```
+
+<iteration-summary>
+## Iteration Summary Output
+
+```markdown
+## Iteration ${iteration} Summary
+
+**CI Status**: [OK] Passed
+**Comments Addressed**: ${addressedCount}
+  - Code fixes: ${codeFixCount}
+  - Answered questions: ${questionCount}
+  - Resolved as not applicable: ${notApplicableCount}
+**Remaining Unresolved**: ${remainingCount}
+
+${remainingCount > 0 ? 'Continuing...' : 'Ready to merge!'}
+```
+</iteration-summary>
+</ci-review-loop>