@zeyue0329/xiaoma-cli 1.0.49 → 6.0.0-alpha.14

package/src/modules/xmb/workflows/workflow-compliance-check/steps/step-06-web-subprocess-validation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,360 @@
+---
+name: 'step-06-web-subprocess-validation'
+description: 'Analyze web search utilization and subprocess optimization opportunities across workflow steps'
+
+# Path Definitions
+workflow_path: '{project-root}/{xiaoma_folder}/xmb/workflows/workflow-compliance-check'
+
+# File References
+thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-06-web-subprocess-validation.md'
+nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-07-holistic-analysis.md'
+workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
+complianceReportFile: '{output_folder}/workflow-compliance-report-{workflow_name}.md'
+targetWorkflowStepsPath: '{target_workflow_steps_path}'
+
+# Template References
+complianceReportTemplate: '{workflow_path}/templates/compliance-report.md'
+
+# Documentation References
+stepTemplate: '{project-root}/{xiaoma_folder}/xmb/docs/workflows/step-template.md'
+workflowTemplate: '{project-root}/{xiaoma_folder}/xmb/docs/workflows/workflow-template.md'
+intentSpectrum: '{project-root}/{xiaoma_folder}/xmb/docs/workflows/intent-vs-prescriptive-spectrum.md'
+---
+
+# Step 6: Web Search & Subprocess Optimization Analysis
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+Analyze each workflow step for optimal web search utilization and subprocess usage patterns, ensuring LLM resources are used efficiently while avoiding unnecessary searches or processing delays.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are a performance optimization specialist and resource efficiency analyst
+- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style, and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
+- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
+- ✅ You bring expertise in LLM optimization, web search strategy, and subprocess utilization
+- ✅ User brings their workflow and needs efficiency recommendations
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Focus only on web search necessity and subprocess optimization opportunities
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to recommend web searches when LLM knowledge is sufficient
+- 💬 Approach: Analytical and optimization-focused with clear efficiency rationale
+- 📋 Use subprocesses when analyzing multiple steps to improve efficiency
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Analyze each step for web search appropriateness vs. LLM knowledge sufficiency
+- 💾 Identify subprocess optimization opportunities for parallel processing
+- 📖 Use subprocesses/subagents when analyzing multiple steps for efficiency
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to overlook inefficiencies or recommend unnecessary searches
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: All workflow step files and subprocess availability
+- Focus: Web search optimization and subprocess utilization analysis
+- Limits: Resource optimization analysis only, holistic workflow analysis comes next
+- Dependencies: Completed Intent Spectrum validation from previous phase
+
+## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
+
+### 1. Initialize Web Search & Subprocess Analysis
+
+"Beginning **Phase 5: Web Search & Subprocess Optimization Analysis**
+Target: `{target_workflow_name}`
+
+Analyzing each workflow step for:
+
+- Appropriate web search utilization vs. unnecessary searches
+- Subprocess optimization opportunities for efficiency
+- LLM resource optimization patterns
+- Performance bottlenecks and speed improvements
+
+**Note:** Using subprocess analysis for efficient multi-step evaluation..."
+
+### 2. Web Search Necessity Analysis
+
+**A. Intelligent Search Assessment Criteria:**
+
+For each step, analyze web search appropriateness using these criteria:
+
+"**Web Search Appropriateness Analysis:**
+
+- **Knowledge Currency:** Is recent/real-time information required?
+- **Specific Data Needs:** Are there specific facts/data not in LLM training?
+- **Verification Requirements:** Does the task require current verification?
+- **LLM Knowledge Sufficiency:** Can LLM adequately handle with existing knowledge?
+- **Search Cost vs. Benefit:** Is search time worth the information gain?"
+
+**B. Step-by-Step Web Search Analysis:**
+
+Using subprocess for parallel analysis of multiple steps:
+
+"**Analyzing [number] steps for web search optimization...**"
+
+For each step file:
+
+```markdown
+**Step:** {step_filename}
+
+**Current Web Search Usage:**
+
+- [Explicit web search instructions found]
+- [Search frequency and scope]
+- [Search-specific topics/queries]
+
+**Intelligent Assessment:**
+
+- **Appropriate Searches:** [Searches that are truly necessary]
+- **Unnecessary Searches:** [Searches LLM could handle internally]
+- **Optimization Opportunities:** [How to improve search efficiency]
+
+**Recommendations:**
+
+- **Keep:** [Essential web searches]
+- **Remove:** [Unnecessary searches that waste time]
+- **Optimize:** [Searches that could be more focused/efficient]
+```
+
+### 3. Subprocess & Parallel Processing Analysis
+
+**A. Subprocess Opportunity Identification:**
+
+"**Subprocess Optimization Analysis:**
+Looking for opportunities where multiple steps or analyses can run simultaneously..."
+
+**Analysis Categories:**
+
+- **Parallel Step Execution:** Can any steps run simultaneously?
+- **Multi-faceted Analysis:** Can single step analyses be broken into parallel sub-tasks?
+- **Batch Processing:** Can similar operations be grouped for efficiency?
+- **Background Processing:** Can any analyses run while user interacts?
+
+**B. Implementation Patterns:**
+
+```markdown
+**Subprocess Implementation Opportunities:**
+
+**Multi-Step Validation:**
+"Use subprocesses when checking 6+ validation items - just need results back"
+
+- Current: Sequential processing of all validation checks
+- Optimized: Parallel subprocess analysis for faster completion
+
+**Parallel User Assistance:**
+
+- Can user interaction continue while background processing occurs?
+- Can multiple analyses run simultaneously during user wait times?
+
+**Batch Operations:**
+
+- Can similar file operations be grouped?
+- Can multiple data sources be processed in parallel?
+```
+
+### 4. LLM Resource Optimization Analysis
+
+**A. Context Window Optimization:**
+
+"**LLM Resource Efficiency Analysis:**
+Analyzing how each step uses LLM resources efficiently..."
+
+**Optimization Areas:**
+
+- **JIT Loading:** Are references loaded only when needed?
+- **Context Management:** Is context used efficiently vs. wasted?
+- **Memory Efficiency:** Can large analyses be broken into smaller, focused tasks?
+- **Parallel Processing:** Can LLM instances work simultaneously on different aspects?
+
+**B. Speed vs. Quality Trade-offs:**
+
+"**Performance Optimization Assessment:**
+
+- **Speed-Critical Steps:** Which steps benefit most from subprocess acceleration?
+- **Quality-Critical Steps:** Which steps need focused LLM attention?
+- **Parallel Candidates:** Which analyses can run without affecting user experience?
+- **Background Processing:** What can happen while user is reading/responding?"
+
+### 5. Step-by-Step Optimization Recommendations
+
+**A. Using Subprocess for Efficient Analysis:**
+
+"**Processing all steps for optimization opportunities using subprocess analysis...**"
+
+**For each workflow step, analyze:**
+
+**1. Web Search Optimization:**
+
+```markdown
+**Step:** {step_name}
+**Current Search Usage:** {current_search_instructions}
+**Intelligent Assessment:** {is_search_necessary}
+**Recommendation:**
+
+- **Keep essential searches:** {specific_searches_to_keep}
+- **Remove unnecessary searches:** {searches_to_remove}
+- **Optimize search queries:** {improved_search_approach}
+```
+
+**2. Subprocess Opportunities:**
+
+```markdown
+**Parallel Processing Potential:**
+
+- **Can run with user interaction:** {yes/no_specifics}
+- **Can batch with other steps:** {opportunities}
+- **Can break into sub-tasks:** {subtask_breakdown}
+- **Background processing:** {what_can_run_in_background}
+```
+
+**3. LLM Efficiency:**
+
+```markdown
+**Resource Optimization:**
+
+- **Context efficiency:** {current_vs_optimal}
+- **Processing time:** {estimated_improvements}
+- **User experience impact:** {better/same/worse}
+```
+
+### 6. Aggregate Optimization Analysis
+
+**A. Web Search Optimization Summary:**
+
+"**Web Search Optimization Results:**
+
+- **Total Steps Analyzed:** [number]
+- **Steps with Web Searches:** [number]
+- **Unnecessary Searches Found:** [number]
+- **Optimization Opportunities:** [number]
+- **Estimated Time Savings:** [time_estimate]"
+
+**B. Subprocess Implementation Summary:**
+
+"**Subprocess Optimization Results:**
+
+- **Parallel Processing Opportunities:** [number]
+- **Batch Processing Groups:** [number]
+- **Background Processing Tasks:** [number]
+- **Estimated Performance Improvement:** [percentage_improvement]"
+
+### 7. User-Facing Optimization Report
+
+**A. Key Efficiency Findings:**
+
+"**Optimization Analysis Summary:**
+
+**Web Search Efficiency:**
+
+- **Current Issues:** [unnecessary searches wasting time]
+- **Recommendations:** [specific improvements]
+- **Expected Benefits:** [faster response, better user experience]
+
+**Processing Speed Improvements:**
+
+- **Parallel Processing Gains:** [specific opportunities]
+- **Background Processing Benefits:** [user experience improvements]
+- **Resource Optimization:** [LLM efficiency gains]
+
+**Implementation Priority:**
+
+1. **High Impact, Low Effort:** [Quick wins]
+2. **High Impact, High Effort:** [Major improvements]
+3. **Low Impact, Low Effort:** [Fine-tuning]
+4. **Future Considerations:** [Advanced optimizations]"
+
+### 8. Document Optimization Findings
+
+Append to {complianceReportFile}:
+
+```markdown
+## Web Search & Subprocess Optimization Analysis
+
+### Web Search Optimization
+
+**Unnecessary Searches Identified:** [number]
+**Essential Searches to Keep:** [specific_list]
+**Optimization Recommendations:** [detailed_suggestions]
+**Estimated Time Savings:** [time_improvement]
+
+### Subprocess Optimization Opportunities
+
+**Parallel Processing:** [number] opportunities identified
+**Batch Processing:** [number] grouping opportunities
+**Background Processing:** [number] background task opportunities
+**Performance Improvement:** [estimated_improvement_percentage]%
+
+### Resource Efficiency Analysis
+
+**Context Optimization:** [specific_improvements]
+**LLM Resource Usage:** [efficiency_gains]
+**User Experience Impact:** [positive_changes]
+
+### Implementation Recommendations
+
+**Immediate Actions:** [quick_improvements]
+**Strategic Improvements:** [major_optimizations]
+**Future Enhancements:** [advanced_optimizations]
+```
+
+### 9. Continuation Confirmation
+
+"**Web Search & Subprocess Analysis Complete:**
+
+- **Web Search Optimization:** [summary of improvements]
+- **Subprocess Opportunities:** [number of optimization areas]
+- **Performance Impact:** [expected efficiency gains]
+- **User Experience Benefits:** [specific improvements]
+
+**Ready for Phase 6:** Holistic workflow analysis
+
+- Flow validation and completion paths
+- Goal alignment with optimized resources
+- Meta-workflow failure analysis
+- Strategic recommendations with efficiency considerations
+
+**Select an Option:** [C] Continue to Holistic Analysis [X] Exit"
+
+## Menu Handling Logic:
+
+- IF C: Save optimization findings to report, update frontmatter, then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
+- IF X: Save current findings and end with guidance for resuming
+- IF Any other comments or queries: respond and redisplay menu
+
+## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
+
+ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [web search and subprocess analysis complete with optimization recommendations documented], will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute and begin holistic analysis phase.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Intelligent assessment of web search necessity vs. LLM knowledge sufficiency
+- Identification of unnecessary web searches that waste user time
+- Discovery of subprocess optimization opportunities for parallel processing
+- Analysis of LLM resource efficiency patterns
+- Specific, actionable optimization recommendations provided
+- Performance impact assessment with estimated improvements
+- User experience benefits clearly articulated
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Recommending web searches when LLM knowledge is sufficient
+- Missing subprocess optimization opportunities
+- Not using subprocess analysis when evaluating multiple steps
+- Overlooking LLM resource inefficiencies
+- Providing vague or non-actionable optimization recommendations
+- Failing to assess impact on user experience
+
+**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.

package/src/modules/xmb/workflows/workflow-compliance-check/steps/step-07-holistic-analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+---
+name: 'step-07-holistic-analysis'
+description: 'Analyze workflow flow, goal alignment, and meta-workflow failures'
+
+# Path Definitions
+workflow_path: '{project-root}/{xiaoma_folder}/xmb/workflows/workflow-compliance-check'
+
+# File References
+thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-07-holistic-analysis.md'
+nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-08-generate-report.md'
+workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
+complianceReportFile: '{output_folder}/workflow-compliance-report-{workflow_name}.md'
+targetWorkflowFile: '{target_workflow_path}'
+
+# Template References
+complianceReportTemplate: '{workflow_path}/templates/compliance-report.md'
+
+# Documentation References
+stepTemplate: '{project-root}/{xiaoma_folder}/xmb/docs/workflows/step-template.md'
+workflowTemplate: '{project-root}/{xiaoma_folder}/xmb/docs/workflows/workflow-template.md'
+intentSpectrum: '{project-root}/{xiaoma_folder}/xmb/docs/workflows/intent-vs-prescriptive-spectrum.md'
+---
+
+# Step 7: Holistic Workflow Analysis
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+Perform comprehensive workflow analysis including flow validation, goal alignment assessment, optimization opportunities, and meta-workflow failure identification to provide complete compliance picture.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are a compliance validator and quality assurance specialist
+- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
+- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
+- ✅ You bring holistic workflow analysis and optimization expertise
+- ✅ User brings their workflow and needs comprehensive assessment
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Focus on holistic analysis beyond template compliance
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip flow validation or optimization assessment
+- 💬 Approach: Systematic end-to-end workflow analysis
+- 📋 Identify meta-workflow failures and improvement opportunities
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Analyze complete workflow flow from start to finish
+- 💾 Validate goal alignment and optimization opportunities
+- 📖 Identify what meta-workflows (create/edit) should have caught
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to provide superficial analysis without specific recommendations
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: Complete workflow analysis from previous phases
+- Focus: Holistic workflow optimization and meta-process improvement
+- Limits: Analysis phase only, report generation comes next
+- Dependencies: Completed workflow.md and step validation phases
+
+## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
+
+### 1. Initialize Holistic Analysis
+
+"Beginning **Phase 3: Holistic Workflow Analysis**
+Target: `{target_workflow_name}`
+
+Analyzing workflow from multiple perspectives:
+
+- Flow and completion validation
+- Goal alignment assessment
+- Optimization opportunities
+- Meta-workflow failure analysis..."
+
+### 2. Workflow Flow Validation
+
+**A. Completion Path Analysis:**
+Trace all possible paths through the workflow:
+
+"**Flow Validation Analysis:**"
+
+- Does every step have a clear continuation path?
+- Do all menu options have valid destinations?
+- Are there any orphaned steps or dead ends?
+- Can the workflow always reach a successful completion?
+
+**Document issues:**
+
+- **Critical:** Steps without completion paths
+- **Major:** Inconsistent menu handling or broken references
+- **Minor:** Inefficient flow patterns
+
+**B. Sequential Logic Validation:**
+Check step sequence logic:
+
+- Does step order make logical sense?
+- Are dependencies properly structured?
+- Is information flow between steps optimal?
+- Are there unnecessary steps or missing functionality?
+
+### 3. Goal Alignment Assessment
+
+**A. Stated Goal Analysis:**
+Compare workflow.md goal with actual implementation:
+
+"**Goal Alignment Analysis:**"
+
+- **Stated Goal:** [quote from workflow.md]
+- **Actual Implementation:** [what the workflow actually does]
+- **Alignment Score:** [percentage match]
+- **Gap Analysis:** [specific misalignments]
+
+**B. User Experience Assessment:**
+Evaluate workflow from user perspective:
+
+- Is the workflow intuitive and easy to follow?
+- Are user inputs appropriately requested?
+- Is feedback clear and timely?
+- Is the workflow efficient for the stated purpose?
+
+### 4. Optimization Opportunities
+
+**A. Efficiency Analysis:**
+"**Optimization Assessment:**"
+
+- **Step Consolidation:** Could any steps be combined?
+- **Parallel Processing:** Could any operations run simultaneously?
+- **JIT Loading:** Are references loaded optimally?
+- **User Experience:** Where could user experience be improved?
+
+**B. Architecture Improvements:**
+
+- **Template Usage:** Are templates used optimally?
+- **Output Management:** Are outputs appropriate and necessary?
+- **Error Handling:** Is error handling comprehensive?
+- **Extensibility:** Can the workflow be easily extended?
+
+### 5. Meta-Workflow Failure Analysis
+
+**CRITICAL SECTION:** Identify what create/edit workflows should have caught
+
+"**Meta-Workflow Failure Analysis:**
+**Issues that should have been prevented by create-workflow/edit-workflow:**"
+
+**A. Create-Workflow Failures:**
+
+- Missing frontmatter fields that should be validated during creation
+- Incorrect path variable formats that should be standardized
+- Template usage violations that should be caught during design
+- Menu pattern deviations that should be enforced during build
+- Workflow type mismatches that should be detected during planning
+
+**B. Edit-Workflow Failures (if applicable):**
+
+- Introduced compliance violations during editing
+- Breaking template structure during modifications
+- Inconsistent changes that weren't validated
+- Missing updates to dependent files/references
+
+**C. Systemic Process Improvements:**
+"**Recommended Improvements for Meta-Workflows:**"
+
+**For create-workflow:**
+
+- Add validation step for frontmatter completeness
+- Implement path variable format checking
+- Add workflow type template usage validation
+- Include menu pattern enforcement
+- Add flow validation before finalization
+- **Add Intent vs Prescriptive spectrum selection early in design process**
+- **Include spectrum education for users during workflow creation**
+- **Validate spectrum consistency throughout workflow design**
+
+**For edit-workflow:**
+
+- Add compliance validation before applying changes
+- Include template structure checking during edits
+- Implement cross-file consistency validation
+- Add regression testing for compliance
+- **Validate that edits maintain intended spectrum position**
+- **Check for unintended spectrum shifts during modifications**
+
+### 6. Severity-Based Recommendations
+
+"**Strategic Recommendations by Priority:**"
+
+**IMMEDIATE (Critical) - Must Fix for Workflow to Function:**
+
+1. [Most critical issue with specific fix]
+2. [Second critical issue with specific fix]
+
+**HIGH PRIORITY (Major) - Significantly Impacts Quality:**
+
+1. [Major issue affecting maintainability]
+2. [Major issue affecting user experience]
+
+**MEDIUM PRIORITY (Minor) - Standards Compliance:**
+
+1. [Minor template compliance issue]
+2. [Cosmetic or consistency improvements]
+
+### 7. Continuation Confirmation
+
+"**Phase 5 Complete:** Holistic analysis finished
+
+- **Flow Validation:** [summary findings]
+- **Goal Alignment:** [alignment percentage and key gaps]
+- **Optimization Opportunities:** [number key improvements identified]
+- **Meta-Workflow Failures:** [number issues that should have been prevented]
+
+**Ready for Phase 6:** Comprehensive compliance report generation
+
+- All findings compiled into structured report
+- Severity-ranked violation list
+- Specific fix recommendations
+- Meta-workflow improvement suggestions
+
+**Select an Option:** [C] Continue to Report Generation [X] Exit"
+
+## Menu Handling Logic:
+
+- IF C: Save holistic analysis findings to report, update frontmatter, then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
+- IF X: Save current findings and end with guidance for resuming
+- IF Any other comments or queries: respond and redisplay menu
+
+## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
+
+ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [holistic analysis complete with meta-workflow failures identified], will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute and begin comprehensive report generation.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Complete workflow flow validation with all paths traced
+- Goal alignment assessment with specific gap analysis
+- Optimization opportunities identified with prioritized recommendations
+- Meta-workflow failures documented with improvement suggestions
+- Strategic recommendations provided by severity priority
+- User ready for comprehensive report generation
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Skipping flow validation or goal alignment analysis
+- Not identifying meta-workflow failure opportunities
+- Failing to provide specific, actionable recommendations
+- Missing strategic prioritization of improvements
+- Providing superficial analysis without depth
+
+**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.