@zeyue0329/xiaoma-cli 1.0.49 → 6.0.0-alpha.14

package/xiaoma-core/agents/automated-quality-validator.yaml

@@ -1,549 +0,0 @@
-# Automated Quality Validator
-# 自动化质量验证器 - 多层次质量保证系统
-
-meta:
-  name: "Automated Quality Validator"
-  version: "2.0"
-  description: "多层次、全方位自动化质量验证系统"
-  created_date: "2025-09-10"
-  validation_philosophy: "ZERO_TOLERANCE_FOR_QUALITY_DEFECTS"
-
-# ========== 质量验证架构 ==========
-quality_validation_architecture:
-  validation_layers:
-    count: 7
-    execution_mode: "SEQUENTIAL_WITH_GATES"
-    failure_handling: "IMMEDIATE_CORRECTION_AND_RETRY"
-    success_criteria: "ALL_LAYERS_PASS"
-
-  validation_philosophy:
-    - "质量第一，速度第二"
-    - "宁可多验证，不可有缺陷"
-    - "自动化纠错，人工干预最小化"
-    - "全流程质量追踪"
-
-# ========== 第一层：语法和格式验证 ==========
-layer_1_syntax_format_validation:
-  name: "Syntax and Format Validation"
-  priority: "CRITICAL"
-  description: "验证文档的基本语法、格式和结构合规性"
-
-  validators:
-    - validator: "markdown_syntax_validator"
-      description: "Markdown语法验证"
-      checks:
-        - markdown_syntax_correctness
-        - header_hierarchy_validation
-        - list_format_validation
-        - table_format_validation
-        - link_format_validation
-        - code_block_format_validation
-      error_handling: "AUTO_CORRECTION"
-      pass_criteria: "SYNTAX_ERROR_COUNT_ZERO"
-
-    - validator: "yaml_frontmatter_validator"
-      description: "YAML前置元数据验证"
-      checks:
-        - yaml_syntax_validation
-        - required_metadata_presence
-        - metadata_format_validation
-        - metadata_value_validation
-      error_handling: "AUTO_CORRECTION"
-      pass_criteria: "YAML_VALID_AND_COMPLETE"
-
-    - validator: "template_structure_validator"
-      description: "模板结构验证"
-      checks:
-        - required_sections_presence:
-            - "状态"
-            - "用户故事"
-            - "验收标准"
-            - "数据库设计相关"
-            - "API接口规范"
-            - "任务/子任务"
-            - "开发者说明"
-            - "变更日志"
-            - "开发者代理记录"
-            - "QA结果"
-        - section_order_validation
-        - subsection_completeness
-        - header_level_consistency
-      error_handling: "STRUCTURE_RECONSTRUCTION"
-      pass_criteria: "STRUCTURE_100_COMPLIANT"
-
-    - validator: "content_format_validator"
-      description: "内容格式验证"
-      checks:
-        - user_story_format: "^\\*\\*作为\\*\\*.*\\*\\*我希望\\*\\*.*\\*\\*以便\\*\\*.*$"
-        - status_value_validation:
-            ["Draft", "Approved", "InProgress", "Review", "Done", "Completed"]
-        - table_format_consistency
-        - json_code_block_validation
-        - bash_code_block_validation
-      error_handling: "FORMAT_STANDARDIZATION"
-      pass_criteria: "FORMAT_COMPLIANCE_100"
-
-  layer_success_criteria:
-    syntax_errors: 0
-    format_violations: 0
-    structure_defects: 0
-    overall_score: 100
-
-# ========== 第二层：内容完整性验证 ==========
-layer_2_content_completeness_validation:
-  name: "Content Completeness Validation"
-  priority: "CRITICAL"
-  description: "验证文档内容的完整性和必要信息的存在"
-
-  validators:
-    - validator: "user_story_completeness_validator"
-      description: "用户故事完整性验证"
-      checks:
-        - user_story_presence_and_format
-        - acceptance_criteria_completeness
-        - acceptance_criteria_measurability
-        - story_value_proposition_clarity
-      scoring_method: "COMPLETENESS_PERCENTAGE"
-      pass_criteria: "COMPLETENESS_SCORE_95_PLUS"
-
-    - validator: "database_design_completeness_validator"
-      description: "数据库设计完整性验证"
-      checks:
-        - entities_table_completeness:
-            required_columns: ["实体名称", "表名", "主要用途", "关键字段"]
-            minimum_entities: 1
-        - data_operations_completeness:
-            required_operations:
-              ["查询操作", "插入操作", "更新操作", "删除操作"]
-            operation_descriptions: "DETAILED_AND_SPECIFIC"
-        - business_rules_presence:
-            minimum_rules: 3
-            rule_specificity: "ACTIONABLE_AND_TESTABLE"
-      scoring_method: "WEIGHTED_COMPLETENESS"
-      pass_criteria: "DB_DESIGN_SCORE_90_PLUS"
-
-    - validator: "api_specification_completeness_validator"
-      description: "API规范完整性验证"
-      checks:
-        - api_endpoints_table_completeness:
-            required_columns:
-              ["序号", "接口名称", "HTTP方法", "路径", "说明", "状态"]
-            minimum_endpoints: 1
-        - api_detailed_design_completeness:
-            required_elements:
-              [
-                "接口描述",
-                "HTTP方法",
-                "请求路径",
-                "请求参数",
-                "响应数据结构",
-                "请求示例",
-                "响应示例",
-                "错误码定义",
-              ]
-            example_quality: "REALISTIC_AND_COMPREHENSIVE"
-        - data_mapping_completeness:
-            mapping_tables_presence: true
-            mapping_accuracy: "FIELD_LEVEL_MAPPING"
-      scoring_method: "API_COMPLETENESS_MATRIX"
-      pass_criteria: "API_SPEC_SCORE_90_PLUS"
-
-    - validator: "implementation_guidance_completeness_validator"
-      description: "实施指导完整性验证"
-      checks:
-        - task_breakdown_completeness:
-            backend_tasks_presence: true
-            frontend_tasks_presence: true
-            testing_tasks_presence: true
-            task_specificity: "ACTIONABLE_WITH_CLEAR_DELIVERABLES"
-        - developer_notes_completeness:
-            database_context: "COMPREHENSIVE"
-            api_context: "COMPREHENSIVE"
-            integration_context: "COMPREHENSIVE"
-            testing_context: "COMPREHENSIVE"
-        - qa_results_completeness:
-            test_categories_coverage:
-              ["数据库操作正确性", "API接口功能性", "性能测试结果"]
-            results_specificity: "QUANTITATIVE_WITH_METRICS"
-      scoring_method: "IMPLEMENTATION_READINESS_SCORE"
-      pass_criteria: "IMPLEMENTATION_SCORE_85_PLUS"
-
-  layer_success_criteria:
-    user_story_completeness: 95
-    database_design_completeness: 90
-    api_specification_completeness: 90
-    implementation_guidance_completeness: 85
-    overall_completeness_score: 90
-
-# ========== 第三层：内容质量验证 ==========
-layer_3_content_quality_validation:
-  name: "Content Quality Validation"
-  priority: "HIGH"
-  description: "验证内容的准确性、清晰度和专业性"
-
-  validators:
-    - validator: "technical_accuracy_validator"
-      description: "技术准确性验证"
-      checks:
-        - database_design_accuracy:
-            entity_relationship_logic: "TECHNICALLY_SOUND"
-            sql_naming_conventions: "STANDARD_COMPLIANT"
-            data_type_appropriateness: "OPTIMAL_CHOICES"
-        - api_design_accuracy:
-            rest_principles_compliance: "RESTFUL_DESIGN"
-            http_method_appropriateness: "SEMANTICALLY_CORRECT"
-            status_code_accuracy: "HTTP_STANDARD_COMPLIANT"
-            json_schema_validity: "VALID_JSON_STRUCTURE"
-        - implementation_accuracy:
-            technology_stack_consistency: "COHERENT_CHOICES"
-            architectural_pattern_adherence: "BEST_PRACTICES"
-            security_consideration_adequacy: "COMPREHENSIVE_COVERAGE"
-      scoring_method: "EXPERT_SYSTEM_EVALUATION"
-      pass_criteria: "TECHNICAL_ACCURACY_SCORE_90_PLUS"
-
-    - validator: "clarity_and_readability_validator"
-      description: "清晰度和可读性验证"
-      checks:
-        - language_clarity:
-            sentence_structure: "CLEAR_AND_CONCISE"
-            terminology_consistency: "STANDARDIZED_USAGE"
-            technical_explanation_quality: "ACCESSIBLE_TO_TARGET_AUDIENCE"
-        - documentation_clarity:
-            instruction_actionability: "STEP_BY_STEP_CLEAR"
-            example_quality: "REALISTIC_AND_HELPFUL"
-            context_sufficiency: "COMPREHENSIVE_BACKGROUND"
-        - visual_organization:
-            table_readability: "WELL_FORMATTED"
-            section_flow_logic: "LOGICAL_PROGRESSION"
-            information_hierarchy: "CLEAR_STRUCTURE"
-      scoring_method: "READABILITY_METRICS_ANALYSIS"
-      pass_criteria: "CLARITY_SCORE_85_PLUS"
-
-    - validator: "professional_quality_validator"
-      description: "专业质量验证"
-      checks:
-        - documentation_professionalism:
-            consistency_in_style: "UNIFORM_PRESENTATION"
-            completeness_of_information: "THOROUGH_COVERAGE"
-            attention_to_detail: "HIGH_PRECISION"
-        - business_alignment:
-            requirement_traceability: "CLEAR_LINKAGE"
-            value_proposition_articulation: "COMPELLING_AND_CLEAR"
-            stakeholder_consideration: "COMPREHENSIVE_PERSPECTIVE"
-        - implementation_readiness:
-            actionability_of_tasks: "IMMEDIATELY_EXECUTABLE"
-            resource_requirement_clarity: "WELL_DEFINED"
-            risk_and_dependency_identification: "PROACTIVE_CONSIDERATION"
-      scoring_method: "PROFESSIONAL_STANDARDS_ASSESSMENT"
-      pass_criteria: "PROFESSIONAL_QUALITY_SCORE_85_PLUS"
-
-  layer_success_criteria:
-    technical_accuracy: 90
-    clarity_and_readability: 85
-    professional_quality: 85
-    overall_quality_score: 87
-
-# ========== 第四层：一致性验证 ==========
-layer_4_consistency_validation:
-  name: "Consistency Validation"
-  priority: "HIGH"
-  description: "验证跨文档和内部一致性"
-
-  validators:
-    - validator: "terminology_consistency_validator"
-      description: "术语一致性验证"
-      checks:
-        - entity_naming_consistency:
-            database_entity_names: "EXACT_MATCH_ACROSS_DOCUMENTS"
-            api_resource_names: "CONSISTENT_NAMING_CONVENTION"
-            variable_naming: "STANDARDIZED_PATTERNS"
-        - technical_term_consistency:
-            framework_names: "CONSISTENT_USAGE"
-            technology_references: "STANDARDIZED_TERMINOLOGY"
-            status_values: "UNIFORM_ACROSS_ALL_DOCUMENTS"
-        - business_term_consistency:
-            domain_terminology: "CONSISTENT_DEFINITIONS"
-            role_names: "STANDARDIZED_ACROSS_STORIES"
-            process_terminology: "UNIFIED_LANGUAGE"
-      scoring_method: "TERMINOLOGY_DICTIONARY_MATCHING"
-      pass_criteria: "TERMINOLOGY_CONSISTENCY_95_PLUS"
-
-    - validator: "structural_consistency_validator"
-      description: "结构一致性验证"
-      checks:
-        - template_structure_uniformity:
-            section_presence: "IDENTICAL_ACROSS_ALL_DOCUMENTS"
-            section_ordering: "CONSISTENT_SEQUENCE"
-            subsection_structure: "UNIFORM_HIERARCHY"
-        - format_consistency:
-            table_formats: "IDENTICAL_STRUCTURE"
-            code_block_formatting: "CONSISTENT_STYLE"
-            list_formatting: "UNIFORM_PATTERNS"
-        - content_organization_consistency:
-            information_flow: "LOGICAL_AND_CONSISTENT"
-            detail_level_consistency: "APPROPRIATE_DEPTH_UNIFORMLY"
-            example_format_consistency: "STANDARDIZED_PRESENTATION"
-      scoring_method: "STRUCTURAL_PATTERN_ANALYSIS"
-      pass_criteria: "STRUCTURAL_CONSISTENCY_95_PLUS"
-
-    - validator: "cross_reference_consistency_validator"
-      description: "交叉引用一致性验证"
-      checks:
-        - internal_reference_integrity:
-            section_references: "ALL_REFERENCES_VALID"
-            table_references: "ACCURATE_CROSS_LINKS"
-            figure_references: "PROPER_LINKAGE"
-        - cross_document_reference_integrity:
-            story_to_story_references: "VALID_CROSS_REFERENCES"
-            epic_level_references: "CONSISTENT_EPIC_LINKAGE"
-            version_references: "ACCURATE_VERSION_TRACKING"
-        - external_reference_consistency:
-            template_references: "ACCURATE_TEMPLATE_LINKS"
-            file_path_references: "VALID_FILE_PATHS"
-            url_references: "ACCESSIBLE_AND_RELEVANT"
-      scoring_method: "REFERENCE_GRAPH_VALIDATION"
-      pass_criteria: "REFERENCE_INTEGRITY_98_PLUS"
-
-  layer_success_criteria:
-    terminology_consistency: 95
-    structural_consistency: 95
-    cross_reference_consistency: 98
-    overall_consistency_score: 96
-
-# ========== 第五层：实施可行性验证 ==========
-layer_5_implementation_feasibility_validation:
-  name: "Implementation Feasibility Validation"
-  priority: "MEDIUM"
-  description: "验证设计的实施可行性和技术合理性"
-
-  validators:
-    - validator: "database_design_feasibility_validator"
-      description: "数据库设计可行性验证"
-      checks:
-        - schema_design_validity:
-            table_structure_soundness: "NORMALIZATION_APPROPRIATE"
-            relationship_design_correctness: "FOREIGN_KEY_LOGIC_VALID"
-            index_strategy_reasonableness: "PERFORMANCE_OPTIMIZED"
-        - data_operation_feasibility:
-            query_complexity_assessment: "REASONABLE_PERFORMANCE"
-            transaction_design_soundness: "ACID_COMPLIANT"
-            scalability_considerations: "GROWTH_ACCOMMODATING"
-        - technology_stack_compatibility:
-            database_technology_alignment: "CONSISTENT_WITH_ARCHITECTURE"
-            orm_framework_compatibility: "MYBATIS_PLUS_COMPATIBLE"
-            performance_characteristics: "ACCEPTABLE_PERFORMANCE_PROFILE"
-      scoring_method: "DATABASE_EXPERT_SYSTEM_ANALYSIS"
-      pass_criteria: "DATABASE_FEASIBILITY_85_PLUS"
-
-    - validator: "api_design_feasibility_validator"
-      description: "API设计可行性验证"
-      checks:
-        - rest_api_design_soundness:
-            resource_modeling_appropriateness: "RESTFUL_RESOURCE_DESIGN"
-            http_method_semantic_correctness: "HTTP_SEMANTICS_COMPLIANT"
-            status_code_usage_accuracy: "PROPER_STATUS_CODE_SELECTION"
-        - implementation_complexity_assessment:
-            endpoint_implementation_complexity: "REASONABLE_DEVELOPMENT_EFFORT"
-            data_transformation_complexity: "MANAGEABLE_MAPPING_LOGIC"
-            error_handling_comprehensiveness: "ROBUST_ERROR_MANAGEMENT"
-        - integration_feasibility:
-            frontend_integration_simplicity: "FRONTEND_FRIENDLY_DESIGN"
-            backend_service_integration: "LOOSE_COUPLING_MAINTAINED"
-            third_party_service_compatibility: "EXTERNAL_INTEGRATION_READY"
-      scoring_method: "API_DESIGN_EXPERT_EVALUATION"
-      pass_criteria: "API_FEASIBILITY_85_PLUS"
-
-    - validator: "implementation_task_feasibility_validator"
-      description: "实施任务可行性验证"
-      checks:
-        - task_decomposition_adequacy:
-            granularity_appropriateness: "ACTIONABLE_TASK_SIZE"
-            dependency_identification_completeness: "ALL_DEPENDENCIES_IDENTIFIED"
-            skill_requirement_clarity: "CLEAR_EXPERTISE_REQUIREMENTS"
-        - effort_estimation_reasonableness:
-            development_effort_estimates: "REALISTIC_TIME_ESTIMATES"
-            testing_effort_allocation: "ADEQUATE_QA_TIME"
-            integration_effort_consideration: "INTEGRATION_COMPLEXITY_ACCOUNTED"
-        - resource_requirement_clarity:
-            human_resource_requirements: "CLEAR_ROLE_DEFINITIONS"
-            technology_resource_requirements: "INFRASTRUCTURE_NEEDS_DEFINED"
-            timeline_feasibility: "REALISTIC_SCHEDULE_EXPECTATIONS"
-      scoring_method: "PROJECT_MANAGEMENT_FEASIBILITY_ANALYSIS"
-      pass_criteria: "IMPLEMENTATION_FEASIBILITY_80_PLUS"
-
-  layer_success_criteria:
-    database_design_feasibility: 85
-    api_design_feasibility: 85
-    implementation_task_feasibility: 80
-    overall_feasibility_score: 83
-
-# ========== 第六层：业务价值验证 ==========
-layer_6_business_value_validation:
-  name: "Business Value Validation"
-  priority: "MEDIUM"
-  description: "验证业务价值对齐和需求追踪"
-
-  validators:
-    - validator: "requirement_traceability_validator"
-      description: "需求可追踪性验证"
-      checks:
-        - acceptance_criteria_coverage:
-            requirement_coverage_completeness: "ALL_REQUIREMENTS_ADDRESSED"
-            acceptance_criteria_testability: "MEASURABLE_AND_VERIFIABLE"
-            success_criteria_clarity: "UNAMBIGUOUS_SUCCESS_DEFINITION"
-        - user_story_value_articulation:
-            user_benefit_clarity: "CLEAR_USER_VALUE_PROPOSITION"
-            business_impact_identification: "BUSINESS_BENEFIT_ARTICULATED"
-            priority_justification: "PRIORITY_RATIONALE_CLEAR"
-        - epic_level_alignment:
-            epic_goal_contribution: "CONTRIBUTES_TO_EPIC_OBJECTIVES"
-            strategic_alignment: "BUSINESS_STRATEGY_ALIGNED"
-            stakeholder_value_delivery: "STAKEHOLDER_NEEDS_ADDRESSED"
-      scoring_method: "REQUIREMENT_ENGINEERING_ANALYSIS"
-      pass_criteria: "REQUIREMENT_TRACEABILITY_85_PLUS"
-
-    - validator: "user_experience_impact_validator"
-      description: "用户体验影响验证"
-      checks:
-        - user_journey_consideration:
-            user_workflow_impact: "POSITIVE_WORKFLOW_IMPACT"
-            usability_improvement: "ENHANCED_USER_EXPERIENCE"
-            accessibility_consideration: "INCLUSIVE_DESIGN_PRINCIPLES"
-        - interface_design_quality:
-            ui_component_appropriateness: "SUITABLE_INTERFACE_ELEMENTS"
-            interaction_design_soundness: "INTUITIVE_USER_INTERACTIONS"
-            responsive_design_consideration: "MULTI_DEVICE_COMPATIBILITY"
-        - performance_impact_assessment:
-            response_time_considerations: "ACCEPTABLE_PERFORMANCE_TARGETS"
-            scalability_user_impact: "PERFORMANCE_UNDER_LOAD"
-            reliability_assurance: "HIGH_AVAILABILITY_DESIGN"
-      scoring_method: "UX_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FRAMEWORK"
-      pass_criteria: "UX_IMPACT_SCORE_80_PLUS"
-
-  layer_success_criteria:
-    requirement_traceability: 85
-    user_experience_impact: 80
-    overall_business_value_score: 82
-
-# ========== 第七层：最终集成验证 ==========
-layer_7_final_integration_validation:
-  name: "Final Integration Validation"
-  priority: "CRITICAL"
-  description: "最终集成验证和交付准备"
-
-  validators:
-    - validator: "end_to_end_document_validator"
-      description: "端到端文档验证"
-      checks:
-        - document_flow_coherence:
-            logical_story_progression: "COHERENT_NARRATIVE_FLOW"
-            information_completeness: "NO_INFORMATION_GAPS"
-            cross_section_consistency: "SEAMLESS_INFORMATION_FLOW"
-        - implementation_readiness:
-            development_team_readiness: "ACTIONABLE_FOR_DEVELOPERS"
-            testing_team_readiness: "TESTABLE_SPECIFICATIONS"
-            deployment_readiness: "DEPLOYMENT_CONSIDERATIONS_ADDRESSED"
-        - maintenance_consideration:
-            documentation_maintainability: "EASY_TO_UPDATE_AND_MAINTAIN"
-            knowledge_transfer_readiness: "COMPREHENSIVE_KNOWLEDGE_CAPTURE"
-            future_enhancement_consideration: "EXTENSIBILITY_DESIGNED"
-      scoring_method: "HOLISTIC_DOCUMENT_EVALUATION"
-      pass_criteria: "DOCUMENT_INTEGRATION_90_PLUS"
-
-    - validator: "quality_metrics_achievement_validator"
-      description: "质量指标达成验证"
-      checks:
-        - all_layer_success_verification:
-            layer_1_success: "SYNTAX_FORMAT_PERFECT"
-            layer_2_success: "CONTENT_COMPLETE"
-            layer_3_success: "QUALITY_HIGH"
-            layer_4_success: "CONSISTENCY_MAINTAINED"
-            layer_5_success: "FEASIBILITY_CONFIRMED"
-            layer_6_success: "BUSINESS_VALUE_ALIGNED"
-        - overall_quality_score_calculation:
-            weighted_score_computation: "COMPREHENSIVE_QUALITY_METRICS"
-            benchmark_comparison: "INDUSTRY_STANDARD_EXCEEDED"
-            continuous_improvement_identification: "ENHANCEMENT_OPPORTUNITIES_NOTED"
-        - delivery_certification:
-            quality_certification: "QUALITY_STANDARDS_MET"
-            completeness_certification: "COMPREHENSIVE_DOCUMENTATION"
-            implementation_readiness_certification: "READY_FOR_DEVELOPMENT"
-      scoring_method: "COMPREHENSIVE_QUALITY_DASHBOARD"
-      pass_criteria: "OVERALL_QUALITY_90_PLUS"
-
-  layer_success_criteria:
-    end_to_end_document_quality: 90
-    quality_metrics_achievement: 90
-    overall_integration_score: 90
-
-# ========== 质量纠错和改进系统 ==========
-quality_correction_and_improvement_system:
-  immediate_correction_triggers:
-    - critical_failures:
-        ["syntax_errors", "missing_required_sections", "format_violations"]
-      correction_action: "IMMEDIATE_AUTO_CORRECTION"
-      retry_attempts: 3
-      escalation: "MANUAL_INTERVENTION_IF_AUTO_CORRECTION_FAILS"
-
-    - quality_deficiencies:
-        ["content_gaps", "clarity_issues", "consistency_problems"]
-      correction_action: "ITERATIVE_IMPROVEMENT"
-      improvement_rounds: 2
-      success_criteria: "QUALITY_THRESHOLD_ACHIEVED"
-
-    - feasibility_concerns: ["implementation_complexity", "technical_soundness"]
-      correction_action: "EXPERT_SYSTEM_OPTIMIZATION"
-      optimization_focus: "TECHNICAL_REFINEMENT"
-      validation_requirement: "EXPERT_APPROVAL"
-
-  continuous_improvement_loop:
-    - feedback_collection:
-        validation_results_analysis: "IDENTIFY_IMPROVEMENT_PATTERNS"
-        quality_trend_monitoring: "TRACK_QUALITY_EVOLUTION"
-        user_feedback_integration: "INCORPORATE_USER_INSIGHTS"
-
-    - process_optimization:
-        validator_effectiveness_assessment: "OPTIMIZE_VALIDATION_ALGORITHMS"
-        correction_strategy_refinement: "IMPROVE_AUTO_CORRECTION_ACCURACY"
-        quality_standard_evolution: "RAISE_QUALITY_BARS_PROGRESSIVELY"
-
-# ========== 报告和仪表板系统 ==========
-reporting_and_dashboard_system:
-  real_time_quality_dashboard:
-    - layer_by_layer_status: "VISUAL_PROGRESS_TRACKING"
-    - quality_score_monitoring: "REAL_TIME_SCORE_UPDATES"
-    - correction_activity_log: "AUTO_CORRECTION_TRANSPARENCY"
-    - overall_progress_indicator: "COMPLETION_PERCENTAGE"
-
-  comprehensive_quality_report:
-    - executive_summary: "HIGH_LEVEL_QUALITY_OVERVIEW"
-    - detailed_layer_analysis: "GRANULAR_VALIDATION_RESULTS"
-    - improvement_recommendations: "ACTIONABLE_ENHANCEMENT_SUGGESTIONS"
-    - quality_certification: "FORMAL_QUALITY_ATTESTATION"
-
-  trend_analysis_reporting:
-    - quality_evolution_tracking: "QUALITY_IMPROVEMENT_OVER_TIME"
-    - common_issue_identification: "PATTERN_RECOGNITION_INSIGHTS"
-    - best_practice_recommendations: "PROVEN_QUALITY_STRATEGIES"
-
-# ========== 成功标准定义 ==========
-overall_success_criteria:
-  individual_layer_requirements:
-    layer_1_syntax_format: 100
-    layer_2_content_completeness: 90
-    layer_3_content_quality: 87
-    layer_4_consistency: 96
-    layer_5_implementation_feasibility: 83
-    layer_6_business_value: 82
-    layer_7_final_integration: 90
-
-  overall_quality_requirements:
-    minimum_overall_score: 90
-    critical_failure_tolerance: 0
-    quality_consistency_requirement: "ALL_DOCUMENTS_MEET_STANDARDS"
-
-  delivery_readiness_criteria:
-    documentation_completeness: "100%"
-    implementation_readiness: "DEVELOPMENT_READY"
-    quality_certification: "FORMALLY_CERTIFIED"
-    stakeholder_acceptance: "BUSINESS_APPROVED"