@wowok/agent-mcp 2.7.1 → 2.7.2

package/dist/customer/risk-assessment.js

@@ -1,397 +1 @@
-import { RISK_LEVELS, RISK_DIMENSION_MAX, CUSTOMER_INTELLIGENCE_VERSION } from "./types.js";
-export function riskLevelFromScore(score) {
-    const entry = RISK_LEVELS.find((l) => score >= l.min);
-    return entry?.level ?? "high";
-}
-export function riskLevelLabel(level) {
-    const entry = RISK_LEVELS.find((l) => l.level === level);
-    return entry ? `${entry.color} ${entry.label}` : "🔴 High risk";
-}
-export function riskLevelEmoji(level) {
-    const entry = RISK_LEVELS.find((l) => l.level === level);
-    return entry?.color ?? "🔴";
-}
-export function assessWorkflowRisk(puzzle) {
-    const wf = puzzle.workflow_analysis;
-    const checks = [];
-    const hasArb = wf?.has_arbitration_binding ?? wf?.has_arbitration_path ?? false;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "wf_arbitration_binding",
-        dimension: "workflow",
-        description: "Service has Arbitration object bound (dispute independence)",
-        weight: 10,
-        passed: hasArb,
-        advice: hasArb ? undefined : "⚠️ No Arbitration binding: disputes cannot be escalated to third-party arbitration. Recommend requiring the merchant to bind an Arbitration service (with voting_guard config) before ordering. Dispute is filed via arbitration::dispute(order, arbitration), independent of the machine workflow.",
-    });
-    const hasRefund = wf?.has_refund_path ?? false;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "wf_refund_path",
-        dimension: "workflow",
-        description: "Refund path exists (Arbitration+compensation_fund OR refund Allocator)",
-        weight: 10,
-        passed: hasRefund,
-        advice: hasRefund ? undefined : "⚠️ No refund path: if delivery fails, funds may not be recoverable. Either (a) bind Arbitration AND deposit compensation_fund, or (b) configure a refund-to-order Allocator. Refund via arbitration flows: dispute → arbitration() ruling with indemnity → arb_withdraw by order holder.",
-    });
-    const userOps = wf?.user_operable_forwards ?? 0;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "wf_user_operable",
-        dimension: "workflow",
-        description: "At least 1 user-operable Forward",
-        weight: 8,
-        passed: userOps > 0,
-        advice: userOps > 0 ? undefined : "🔴 No user-operable steps in the workflow: order progress depends entirely on the merchant, leaving you in a passive position.",
-    });
-    const deadEnds = wf?.dead_end_nodes ?? [];
-    const noDeadEnds = deadEnds.length === 0;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "wf_no_dead_ends",
-        dimension: "workflow",
-        description: "No potential dead-end nodes",
-        weight: 4,
-        passed: noDeadEnds,
-        advice: noDeadEnds ? undefined : `⚠️ Detected ${deadEnds.length} potential dead-end node(s): ${deadEnds.join(", ")}. All exits of these nodes depend on merchant action.`,
-    });
-    const machineUsable = wf
-        ? (wf.machine_published && !wf.machine_paused && !wf.has_dispute_anti_pattern)
-        : false;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "wf_machine_usable",
-        dimension: "workflow",
-        description: "Machine published, not paused, no dispute anti-pattern",
-        weight: 3,
-        passed: machineUsable,
-        advice: machineUsable ? undefined
-            : wf?.has_dispute_anti_pattern
-                ? "🔴 Machine contains dispute anti-pattern nodes (disputed/refunded/arb/arbitration). Dispute is INDEPENDENT of machine — these nodes create dead-end paths because arbitrators are in Arbitration.voting_guard, not Permission. Recommend removing these nodes and binding an Arbitration object to the Service instead."
-                : "⚠️ Machine is not published or is paused: the workflow may not be in effect or has been actively paused by the merchant.",
-    });
-    const score = checks.reduce((sum, c) => sum + (c.passed ? c.weight : 0), 0);
-    return { name: "workflow", score, max_score: RISK_DIMENSION_MAX.workflow, checks };
-}
-export function assessFundRisk(puzzle) {
-    const fund = puzzle.fund_safety;
-    const checks = [];
-    let compScore = 0;
-    let compAdvice;
-    if (fund) {
-        if (fund.compensation_covers_order) {
-            compScore = 10;
-        }
-        else if (fund.compensation_ratio > 0) {
-            compScore = Math.round(fund.compensation_ratio * 10);
-            compAdvice = `⚠️ Compensation fund covers only ${Math.round(fund.compensation_ratio * 100)}% of the order amount; insufficient for a full payout.`;
-        }
-        else {
-            compScore = 0;
-            compAdvice = "🔴 No compensation fund: the merchant has not set up a compensation_fund; no automatic payout source if the order fails.";
-        }
-    }
-    else {
-        compScore = 5;
-    }
-    checks.push({
-        id: "fund_compensation",
-        dimension: "fund",
-        description: "Compensation fund adequacy (covers the order amount)",
-        weight: 10,
-        passed: compScore >= 7,
-        advice: compAdvice,
-    });
-    const hasRefundAllocator = fund?.refund_allocator_exists ?? false;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "fund_refund_allocator",
-        dimension: "fund",
-        description: "100%→Order refund Allocator exists",
-        weight: 8,
-        passed: hasRefundAllocator,
-        advice: hasRefundAllocator ? undefined : "⚠️ No 100%→Order Allocator detected: refunds require manual merchant action or arbitration ruling.",
-    });
-    const priceOk = fund ? fund.price_anomaly === "none" : true;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "fund_price_normal",
-        dimension: "fund",
-        description: "No price anomaly (compared with compensation fund and market price)",
-        weight: 4,
-        passed: priceOk,
-        advice: priceOk ? undefined : `⚠️ Price anomaly (${fund?.price_anomaly}): possible fraudulent pricing or abnormally-low-price lure.`,
-    });
-    const lockSafe = fund?.lock_duration_safe ?? true;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "fund_lock_safe",
-        dimension: "fund",
-        description: "Compensation fund lock period is reasonable (≥7 days or no lock)",
-        weight: 3,
-        passed: lockSafe,
-        advice: lockSafe ? undefined : "⚠️ Compensation fund lock period is too short: the merchant may withdraw funds at any time.",
-    });
-    const naiveScore = checks.reduce((sum, c) => sum + (c.passed ? c.weight : 0), 0);
-    const score = fund && !fund.compensation_covers_order && fund.compensation_ratio > 0
-        ? Math.min(RISK_DIMENSION_MAX.fund, naiveScore + compScore - (compScore >= 7 ? 10 : 0))
-        : naiveScore;
-    return { name: "fund", score, max_score: RISK_DIMENSION_MAX.fund, checks };
-}
-export function assessTrustRisk(puzzle) {
-    const trust = puzzle.trust_signals;
-    const checks = [];
-    const arbIndependent = trust?.arbitration_independent ?? true;
-    const permShared = trust?.arbitration_permission_shared === true;
-    const permOverlap = trust?.arbitration_permission_overlap === true;
-    let arbPassed = arbIndependent;
-    let arbAdvice;
-    let arbWeight = 6;
-    if (permShared) {
-        arbPassed = false;
-        arbAdvice = "🔴 CRITICAL: Arbitration and Service share the SAME Permission object. " +
-            "The merchant fully controls arbitration operations (vote, confirm, execute rulings). " +
-            "Dispute fairness cannot be guaranteed. Require the merchant to use a separate, " +
-            "independent Permission object for Arbitration before ordering.";
-    }
-    else if (permOverlap) {
-        arbPassed = false;
-        arbAdvice = "🔴 WARNING: Arbitration and Service have overlapping Permission control " +
-            "(shared owner or admin). Even with separate Permission objects, the merchant can " +
-            "influence dispute outcomes. For mainnet, require completely independent third-party " +
-            "Permission (different owner and admin list) for Arbitration.";
-    }
-    else if (!arbIndependent) {
-        arbAdvice = "🔴 Arbitrator and merchant are the same address: arbitration fairness cannot be guaranteed.";
-    }
-    checks.push({
-        id: "trust_arb_independent",
-        dimension: "trust",
-        description: "Arbitrator has no conflict of interest with the merchant (Permission isolation)",
-        weight: arbWeight,
-        passed: arbPassed,
-        advice: arbAdvice,
-    });
-    let reviewPassed = false;
-    let reviewAdvice;
-    if (trust && trust.review_total > 0) {
-        const likeRate = trust.like_rate;
-        if (likeRate >= 0.85) {
-            reviewPassed = true;
-        }
-        else if (likeRate >= 0.6) {
-            reviewPassed = true;
-            reviewAdvice = `⚠️ Like rate is ${Math.round(likeRate * 100)}%; there is some controversy.`;
-        }
-        else {
-            reviewPassed = false;
-            reviewAdvice = `🔴 Like rate is only ${Math.round(likeRate * 100)}% (${trust.review_likes}/${trust.review_total}); many negative reviews.`;
-        }
-    }
-    else if (trust) {
-        reviewPassed = true;
-    }
-    else {
-        reviewPassed = true;
-    }
-    checks.push({
-        id: "trust_review_reputation",
-        dimension: "trust",
-        description: "Good review reputation (like rate ≥60%)",
-        weight: 5,
-        passed: reviewPassed,
-        advice: reviewAdvice,
-    });
-    const trustScore = trust?.trust_score ?? 50;
-    const trustPassed = trustScore >= 50;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "trust_score",
-        dimension: "trust",
-        description: `Composite trust score ≥50 (current ${trustScore})`,
-        weight: 4,
-        passed: trustPassed,
-        advice: trustPassed ? undefined : `🔴 Composite trust score is only ${trustScore}/100; recommend finding a more trustworthy merchant.`,
-    });
-    const hasContact = trust?.has_contact ?? false;
-    const hasMessenger = trust?.has_messenger ?? false;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "trust_contact",
-        dimension: "trust",
-        description: "Merchant has a contactable Messenger channel",
-        weight: 5,
-        passed: hasContact && hasMessenger,
-        advice: (hasContact && hasMessenger) ? undefined : "🔴 Merchant has no contactable channel (um is empty): no way to conduct pre-order negotiation or post-sale communication.",
-    });
-    const score = checks.reduce((sum, c) => sum + (c.passed ? c.weight : 0), 0);
-    return { name: "trust", score, max_score: RISK_DIMENSION_MAX.trust, checks };
-}
-export function assessBehaviorRisk(puzzle) {
-    const beh = puzzle.merchant_behavior;
-    const checks = [];
-    let trendPassed = false;
-    let trendAdvice;
-    if (beh) {
-        if (beh.recent_trend === "improving") {
-            trendPassed = true;
-        }
-        else if (beh.recent_trend === "stable") {
-            trendPassed = true;
-        }
-        else {
-            trendPassed = false;
-            trendAdvice = "🔴 Merchant's recent dispute rate is rising: fulfillment quality may be deteriorating.";
-        }
-    }
-    else {
-        trendPassed = true;
-    }
-    checks.push({
-        id: "behavior_trend",
-        dimension: "behavior",
-        description: "Recent fulfillment trend is stable or improving",
-        weight: 6,
-        passed: trendPassed,
-        advice: trendAdvice,
-    });
-    const hasOrders = beh != null && beh.total_orders > 0;
-    const completionPassed = hasOrders ? beh.completed_rate >= 0.85 : true;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "behavior_completion_rate",
-        dimension: "behavior",
-        description: "Order completion rate ≥85%",
-        weight: 4,
-        passed: completionPassed,
-        advice: completionPassed ? undefined : `🔴 Completion rate is only ${Math.round((beh?.completed_rate ?? 0) * 100)}%: a higher-than-average share of orders end in failure.`,
-    });
-    const disputeOk = hasOrders ? beh.dispute_rate <= 0.1 : true;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "behavior_low_dispute",
-        dimension: "behavior",
-        description: "Dispute rate ≤10%",
-        weight: 4,
-        passed: disputeOk,
-        advice: disputeOk ? undefined : `⚠️ Dispute rate is ${Math.round((beh?.dispute_rate ?? 0) * 100)}%: above the industry average.`,
-    });
-    const arbLossOk = hasOrders ? beh.arb_loss_rate <= 0.3 : true;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "behavior_arb_loss",
-        dimension: "behavior",
-        description: "Arbitration loss rate ≤30%",
-        weight: 3,
-        passed: arbLossOk,
-        advice: arbLossOk ? undefined : `🔴 Arbitration loss rate is ${Math.round((beh?.arb_loss_rate ?? 0) * 100)}%: the merchant has lost multiple arbitration cases, indicating a tendency to violate rules.`,
-    });
-    const noRedFlags = beh ? beh.red_flags.length === 0 : true;
-    checks.push({
-        id: "behavior_no_red_flags",
-        dimension: "behavior",
-        description: "No behavior red_flags",
-        weight: 3,
-        passed: noRedFlags,
-        advice: noRedFlags ? undefined : `⚠️ Detected behavioral warning signals: ${beh?.red_flags.join(", ")}`,
-    });
-    const score = checks.reduce((sum, c) => sum + (c.passed ? c.weight : 0), 0);
-    return { name: "behavior", score, max_score: RISK_DIMENSION_MAX.behavior, checks };
-}
-export function assessRisk(puzzle) {
-    const dimensions = [
-        assessWorkflowRisk(puzzle),
-        assessFundRisk(puzzle),
-        assessTrustRisk(puzzle),
-        assessBehaviorRisk(puzzle),
-    ];
-    const baseTotal = dimensions.reduce((sum, d) => sum + d.score, 0);
-    const userMetricsAdjustment = puzzle.user_metrics?.adjustment ?? 0;
-    const serviceNestingRisk = puzzle.service_nesting?.overall_risk_score;
-    const serviceNestingLevel = puzzle.service_nesting?.overall_risk_level;
-    const wonderBonus = puzzle.workflow_analysis?.has_wonder_node ? 2 : 0;
-    const total = Math.max(0, Math.min(100, baseTotal + userMetricsAdjustment + wonderBonus));
-    const level = riskLevelFromScore(total);
-    const redFlags = [];
-    for (const dim of dimensions) {
-        for (const check of dim.checks) {
-            if (!check.passed && check.advice && check.advice.startsWith("🔴")) {
-                redFlags.push(`[${dim.name}] ${check.description}: ${check.advice}`);
-            }
-        }
-    }
-    if (puzzle.workflow_analysis?.risk_signals.length) {
-        for (const sig of puzzle.workflow_analysis.risk_signals) {
-            redFlags.push(`[workflow_signal] ${sig}`);
-        }
-    }
-    if (puzzle.merchant_behavior?.red_flags.length) {
-        for (const f of puzzle.merchant_behavior.red_flags) {
-            redFlags.push(`[behavior_flag] ${f}`);
-        }
-    }
-    if (serviceNestingLevel === "high" || serviceNestingLevel === "critical") {
-        redFlags.push(`[service_nesting] overall nesting risk: ${serviceNestingLevel} (score ${serviceNestingRisk})`);
-    }
-    const advice = generateAdvice(puzzle, total, level, dimensions);
-    return {
-        total,
-        base_total: baseTotal,
-        level,
-        dimensions,
-        user_metrics_adjustment: userMetricsAdjustment,
-        service_nesting_risk: serviceNestingRisk,
-        service_nesting_level: serviceNestingLevel,
-        red_flags: redFlags,
-        advice,
-    };
-}
-function generateAdvice(puzzle, total, level, dimensions) {
-    const advice = [];
-    const emoji = riskLevelEmoji(level);
-    const levelEntry = RISK_LEVELS.find((l) => l.level === level);
-    advice.push(`${emoji} Composite risk score: ${total}/100 (${levelEntry?.label ?? "unknown"})`);
-    if (level === "high") {
-        advice.push("🚫 Recommend abandoning this order: the risk level is too high; fund safety cannot be guaranteed.");
-    }
-    else if (level === "medium_high") {
-        advice.push("⚠️ Recommend ordering with caution: be sure to negotiate supplementary terms via Messenger and request a WTS evidence file.");
-    }
-    else if (level === "medium_low") {
-        advice.push("✅ You may order: recommend continuously monitoring order progress and keeping communication records.");
-    }
-    else {
-        advice.push("✅ Safe order: you can order with confidence; still recommend enabling order monitoring reminders.");
-    }
-    const sortedDims = [...dimensions].sort((a, b) => (a.score / a.max_score) - (b.score / b.max_score));
-    for (const dim of sortedDims) {
-        const ratio = dim.max_score > 0 ? dim.score / dim.max_score : 0;
-        if (ratio < 0.5) {
-            const failedChecks = dim.checks.filter((c) => !c.passed);
-            if (failedChecks.length > 0) {
-                advice.push(`📊 ${dim.name} dimension ${dim.score}/${dim.max_score}: ${failedChecks.length} check(s) failed.`);
-                const critical = failedChecks.find((c) => c.advice?.startsWith("🔴"));
-                if (critical?.advice)
-                    advice.push(critical.advice);
-            }
-        }
-    }
-    if (puzzle.completeness < 0.8) {
-        advice.push(`ℹ️ Information completeness is only ${Math.round(puzzle.completeness * 100)}%; missing: ${puzzle.gaps.join(", ") || "none"}. Recommend supplementing data before making a decision.`);
-    }
-    if (puzzle.workflow_analysis?.has_wonder_node) {
-        advice.push("🌟 Machine implements wonder/no-wonder praise design: customers can advance Progress to 'wonder' (positive review) or 'no_wonder' (negative review) after completion. Reward objects can claim against Progress.current == 'wonder' to incentivize positive outcomes.");
-    }
-    if (puzzle.workflow_analysis?.has_dispute_anti_pattern) {
-        advice.push("🔴 Machine contains dispute anti-pattern nodes (disputed/refunded/arb/arbitration). Dispute is INDEPENDENT of machine — it flows through Order → Arbitration.dispute() → Arb → arbitration() → arb_withdraw. Arbitrators are configured in Arbitration.voting_guard, NOT in Permission. Recommend the merchant remove these nodes and bind an Arbitration object instead.");
-    }
-    if (puzzle.user_metrics) {
-        const um = puzzle.user_metrics;
-        const passedCount = um.metrics.filter((m) => m.passed).length;
-        advice.push(`📊 User-customized metrics: ${passedCount}/${um.metrics.length} passed (score ${um.score}/100, adjustment ${um.adjustment >= 0 ? "+" : ""}${um.adjustment}).${um.source_file ? ` Source: ${um.source_file}` : ""}`);
-        for (const m of um.metrics) {
-            if (!m.passed && m.advice) {
-                advice.push(`   • ${m.label}: ${m.advice}`);
-            }
-        }
-    }
-    if (puzzle.service_nesting) {
-        const sn = puzzle.service_nesting;
-        advice.push(`🔗 Service nesting evaluation: ${sn.total_bindings_evaluated} bound objects, overall risk ${sn.overall_risk_level} (score ${sn.overall_risk_score}/100).${sn.truncated ? " Recursion truncated at depth limit." : ""}`);
-    }
-    return advice;
-}
-export function passesRiskThreshold(score, minLevel = "medium_high") {
-    const order = ["high", "medium_high", "medium_low", "low"];
-    const minIdx = order.indexOf(minLevel);
-    const actualIdx = order.indexOf(score.level);
-    return actualIdx >= minIdx;
-}
-export { CUSTOMER_INTELLIGENCE_VERSION };
+import{RISK_LEVELS,RISK_DIMENSION_MAX,CUSTOMER_INTELLIGENCE_VERSION}from'./types.js';export function riskLevelFromScore(a){const b=RISK_LEVELS['find'](c=>a>=c['min']);return b?.['level']??'high';}export function riskLevelLabel(a){const b=RISK_LEVELS['find'](c=>c['level']===a);return b?b['color']+'\x20'+b['label']:'🔴\x20High\x20risk';}export function riskLevelEmoji(a){const b=RISK_LEVELS['find'](c=>c['level']===a);return b?.['color']??'🔴';}export function assessWorkflowRisk(a){const b=a['workflow_analysis'],c=[],d=b?.['has_arbitration_binding']??b?.['has_arbitration_path']??![];c['push']({'id':'wf_arbitration_binding','dimension':'workflow','description':'Service\x20has\x20Arbitration\x20object\x20bound\x20(dispute\x20independence)','weight':0xa,'passed':d,'advice':d?undefined:'⚠️\x20No\x20Arbitration\x20binding:\x20disputes\x20cannot\x20be\x20escalated\x20to\x20third-party\x20arbitration.\x20Recommend\x20requiring\x20the\x20merchant\x20to\x20bind\x20an\x20Arbitration\x20service\x20(with\x20voting_guard\x20config)\x20before\x20ordering.\x20Dispute\x20is\x20filed\x20via\x20arbitration::dispute(order,\x20arbitration),\x20independent\x20of\x20the\x20machine\x20workflow.'});const e=b?.['has_refund_path']??![];c['push']({'id':'wf_refund_path','dimension':'workflow','description':'Refund\x20path\x20exists\x20(Arbitration+compensation_fund\x20OR\x20refund\x20Allocator)','weight':0xa,'passed':e,'advice':e?undefined:'⚠️\x20No\x20refund\x20path:\x20if\x20delivery\x20fails,\x20funds\x20may\x20not\x20be\x20recoverable.\x20Either\x20(a)\x20bind\x20Arbitration\x20AND\x20deposit\x20compensation_fund,\x20or\x20(b)\x20configure\x20a\x20refund-to-order\x20Allocator.\x20Refund\x20via\x20arbitration\x20flows:\x20dispute\x20→\x20arbitration()\x20ruling\x20with\x20indemnity\x20→\x20arb_withdraw\x20by\x20order\x20holder.'});const f=b?.['user_operable_forwards']??0x0;c['push']({'id':'wf_user_operable','dimension':'workflow','description':'At\x20least\x201\x20user-operable\x20Forward','weight':0x8,'passed':f>0x0,'advice':f>0x0?undefined:'🔴\x20No\x20user-operable\x20steps\x20in\x20the\x20workflow:\x20order\x20progress\x20depends\x20entirely\x20on\x20the\x20merchant,\x20leaving\x20you\x20in\x20a\x20passive\x20position.'});const g=b?.['dead_end_nodes']??[],h=g['length']===0x0;c['push']({'id':'wf_no_dead_ends','dimension':'workflow','description':'No\x20potential\x20dead-end\x20nodes','weight':0x4,'passed':h,'advice':h?undefined:'⚠️\x20Detected\x20'+g['length']+'\x20potential\x20dead-end\x20node(s):\x20'+g['join'](',\x20')+'.\x20All\x20exits\x20of\x20these\x20nodes\x20depend\x20on\x20merchant\x20action.'});const i=b?b['machine_published']&&!b['machine_paused']&&!b['has_dispute_anti_pattern']:![];c['push']({'id':'wf_machine_usable','dimension':'workflow','description':'Machine\x20published,\x20not\x20paused,\x20no\x20dispute\x20anti-pattern','weight':0x3,'passed':i,'advice':i?undefined:b?.['has_dispute_anti_pattern']?'🔴\x20Machine\x20contains\x20dispute\x20anti-pattern\x20nodes\x20(disputed/refunded/arb/arbitration).\x20Dispute\x20is\x20INDEPENDENT\x20of\x20machine\x20—\x20these\x20nodes\x20create\x20dead-end\x20paths\x20because\x20arbitrators\x20are\x20in\x20Arbitration.voting_guard,\x20not\x20Permission.\x20Recommend\x20removing\x20these\x20nodes\x20and\x20binding\x20an\x20Arbitration\x20object\x20to\x20the\x20Service\x20instead.':'⚠️\x20Machine\x20is\x20not\x20published\x20or\x20is\x20paused:\x20the\x20workflow\x20may\x20not\x20be\x20in\x20effect\x20or\x20has\x20been\x20actively\x20paused\x20by\x20the\x20merchant.'});const j=c['reduce']((k,l)=>k+(l['passed']?l['weight']:0x0),0x0);return{'name':'workflow','score':j,'max_score':RISK_DIMENSION_MAX['workflow'],'checks':c};}export function assessFundRisk(a){const b=a['fund_safety'],c=[];let d=0x0,e;if(b){if(b['compensation_covers_order'])d=0xa;else b['compensation_ratio']>0x0?(d=Math['round'](b['compensation_ratio']*0xa),e='⚠️\x20Compensation\x20fund\x20covers\x20only\x20'+Math['round'](b['compensation_ratio']*0x64)+'%\x20of\x20the\x20order\x20amount;\x20insufficient\x20for\x20a\x20full\x20payout.'):(d=0x0,e='🔴\x20No\x20compensation\x20fund:\x20the\x20merchant\x20has\x20not\x20set\x20up\x20a\x20compensation_fund;\x20no\x20automatic\x20payout\x20source\x20if\x20the\x20order\x20fails.');}else d=0x5;c['push']({'id':'fund_compensation','dimension':'fund','description':'Compensation\x20fund\x20adequacy\x20(covers\x20the\x20order\x20amount)','weight':0xa,'passed':d>=0x7,'advice':e});const f=b?.['refund_allocator_exists']??![];c['push']({'id':'fund_refund_allocator','dimension':'fund','description':'100%→Order\x20refund\x20Allocator\x20exists','weight':0x8,'passed':f,'advice':f?undefined:'⚠️\x20No\x20100%→Order\x20Allocator\x20detected:\x20refunds\x20require\x20manual\x20merchant\x20action\x20or\x20arbitration\x20ruling.'});const g=b?b['price_anomaly']==='none':!![];c['push']({'id':'fund_price_normal','dimension':'fund','description':'No\x20price\x20anomaly\x20(compared\x20with\x20compensation\x20fund\x20and\x20market\x20price)','weight':0x4,'passed':g,'advice':g?undefined:'⚠️\x20Price\x20anomaly\x20('+b?.['price_anomaly']+'):\x20possible\x20fraudulent\x20pricing\x20or\x20abnormally-low-price\x20lure.'});const h=b?.['lock_duration_safe']??!![];c['push']({'id':'fund_lock_safe','dimension':'fund','description':'Compensation\x20fund\x20lock\x20period\x20is\x20reasonable\x20(≥7\x20days\x20or\x20no\x20lock)','weight':0x3,'passed':h,'advice':h?undefined:'⚠️\x20Compensation\x20fund\x20lock\x20period\x20is\x20too\x20short:\x20the\x20merchant\x20may\x20withdraw\x20funds\x20at\x20any\x20time.'});const i=c['reduce']((k,l)=>k+(l['passed']?l['weight']:0x0),0x0),j=b&&!b['compensation_covers_order']&&b['compensation_ratio']>0x0?Math['min'](RISK_DIMENSION_MAX['fund'],i+d-(d>=0x7?0xa:0x0)):i;return{'name':'fund','score':j,'max_score':RISK_DIMENSION_MAX['fund'],'checks':c};}export function assessTrustRisk(a){const b=a['trust_signals'],c=[],d=b?.['arbitration_independent']??!![],e=b?.['arbitration_permission_shared']===!![],f=b?.['arbitration_permission_overlap']===!![];let g=d,h,i=0x6;if(e)g=![],h='🔴\x20CRITICAL:\x20Arbitration\x20and\x20Service\x20share\x20the\x20SAME\x20Permission\x20object.\x20'+'The\x20merchant\x20fully\x20controls\x20arbitration\x20operations\x20(vote,\x20confirm,\x20execute\x20rulings).\x20'+'Dispute\x20fairness\x20cannot\x20be\x20guaranteed.\x20Require\x20the\x20merchant\x20to\x20use\x20a\x20separate,\x20'+'independent\x20Permission\x20object\x20for\x20Arbitration\x20before\x20ordering.';else{if(f)g=![],h='🔴\x20WARNING:\x20Arbitration\x20and\x20Service\x20have\x20overlapping\x20Permission\x20control\x20'+'(shared\x20owner\x20or\x20admin).\x20Even\x20with\x20separate\x20Permission\x20objects,\x20the\x20merchant\x20can\x20'+'influence\x20dispute\x20outcomes.\x20For\x20mainnet,\x20require\x20completely\x20independent\x20third-party\x20'+'Permission\x20(different\x20owner\x20and\x20admin\x20list)\x20for\x20Arbitration.';else!d&&(h='🔴\x20Arbitrator\x20and\x20merchant\x20are\x20the\x20same\x20address:\x20arbitration\x20fairness\x20cannot\x20be\x20guaranteed.');}c['push']({'id':'trust_arb_independent','dimension':'trust','description':'Arbitrator\x20has\x20no\x20conflict\x20of\x20interest\x20with\x20the\x20merchant\x20(Permission\x20isolation)','weight':i,'passed':g,'advice':h});let j=![],k;if(b&&b['review_total']>0x0){const q=b['like_rate'];if(q>=0.85)j=!![];else q>=0.6?(j=!![],k='⚠️\x20Like\x20rate\x20is\x20'+Math['round'](q*0x64)+'%;\x20there\x20is\x20some\x20controversy.'):(j=![],k='🔴\x20Like\x20rate\x20is\x20only\x20'+Math['round'](q*0x64)+'%\x20('+b['review_likes']+'/'+b['review_total']+');\x20many\x20negative\x20reviews.');}else b?j=!![]:j=!![];c['push']({'id':'trust_review_reputation','dimension':'trust','description':'Good\x20review\x20reputation\x20(like\x20rate\x20≥60%)','weight':0x5,'passed':j,'advice':k});const l=b?.['trust_score']??0x32,m=l>=0x32;c['push']({'id':'trust_score','dimension':'trust','description':'Composite\x20trust\x20score\x20≥50\x20(current\x20'+l+')','weight':0x4,'passed':m,'advice':m?undefined:'🔴\x20Composite\x20trust\x20score\x20is\x20only\x20'+l+'/100;\x20recommend\x20finding\x20a\x20more\x20trustworthy\x20merchant.'});const n=b?.['has_contact']??![],o=b?.['has_messenger']??![];c['push']({'id':'trust_contact','dimension':'trust','description':'Merchant\x20has\x20a\x20contactable\x20Messenger\x20channel','weight':0x5,'passed':n&&o,'advice':n&&o?undefined:'🔴\x20Merchant\x20has\x20no\x20contactable\x20channel\x20(um\x20is\x20empty):\x20no\x20way\x20to\x20conduct\x20pre-order\x20negotiation\x20or\x20post-sale\x20communication.'});const p=c['reduce']((r,s)=>r+(s['passed']?s['weight']:0x0),0x0);return{'name':'trust','score':p,'max_score':RISK_DIMENSION_MAX['trust'],'checks':c};}export function assessBehaviorRisk(a){const b=a['merchant_behavior'],c=[];let d=![],e;if(b){if(b['recent_trend']==='improving')d=!![];else b['recent_trend']==='stable'?d=!![]:(d=![],e='🔴\x20Merchant\x27s\x20recent\x20dispute\x20rate\x20is\x20rising:\x20fulfillment\x20quality\x20may\x20be\x20deteriorating.');}else d=!![];c['push']({'id':'behavior_trend','dimension':'behavior','description':'Recent\x20fulfillment\x20trend\x20is\x20stable\x20or\x20improving','weight':0x6,'passed':d,'advice':e});const f=b!=null&&b['total_orders']>0x0,g=f?b['completed_rate']>=0.85:!![];c['push']({'id':'behavior_completion_rate','dimension':'behavior','description':'Order\x20completion\x20rate\x20≥85%','weight':0x4,'passed':g,'advice':g?undefined:'🔴\x20Completion\x20rate\x20is\x20only\x20'+Math['round']((b?.['completed_rate']??0x0)*0x64)+'%:\x20a\x20higher-than-average\x20share\x20of\x20orders\x20end\x20in\x20failure.'});const h=f?b['dispute_rate']<=0.1:!![];c['push']({'id':'behavior_low_dispute','dimension':'behavior','description':'Dispute\x20rate\x20≤10%','weight':0x4,'passed':h,'advice':h?undefined:'⚠️\x20Dispute\x20rate\x20is\x20'+Math['round']((b?.['dispute_rate']??0x0)*0x64)+'%:\x20above\x20the\x20industry\x20average.'});const i=f?b['arb_loss_rate']<=0.3:!![];c['push']({'id':'behavior_arb_loss','dimension':'behavior','description':'Arbitration\x20loss\x20rate\x20≤30%','weight':0x3,'passed':i,'advice':i?undefined:'🔴\x20Arbitration\x20loss\x20rate\x20is\x20'+Math['round']((b?.['arb_loss_rate']??0x0)*0x64)+'%:\x20the\x20merchant\x20has\x20lost\x20multiple\x20arbitration\x20cases,\x20indicating\x20a\x20tendency\x20to\x20violate\x20rules.'});const j=b?b['red_flags']['length']===0x0:!![];c['push']({'id':'behavior_no_red_flags','dimension':'behavior','description':'No\x20behavior\x20red_flags','weight':0x3,'passed':j,'advice':j?undefined:'⚠️\x20Detected\x20behavioral\x20warning\x20signals:\x20'+b?.['red_flags']['join'](',\x20')});const k=c['reduce']((l,m)=>l+(m['passed']?m['weight']:0x0),0x0);return{'name':'behavior','score':k,'max_score':RISK_DIMENSION_MAX['behavior'],'checks':c};}export function assessRisk(a){const b=[assessWorkflowRisk(a),assessFundRisk(a),assessTrustRisk(a),assessBehaviorRisk(a)],c=b['reduce']((m,n)=>m+n['score'],0x0),d=a['user_metrics']?.['adjustment']??0x0,e=a['service_nesting']?.['overall_risk_score'],g=a['service_nesting']?.['overall_risk_level'],h=a['workflow_analysis']?.['has_wonder_node']?0x2:0x0,i=Math['max'](0x0,Math['min'](0x64,c+d+h)),j=riskLevelFromScore(i),k=[];for(const m of b){for(const n of m['checks']){!n['passed']&&n['advice']&&n['advice']['startsWith']('🔴')&&k['push']('['+m['name']+']\x20'+n['description']+':\x20'+n['advice']);}}if(a['workflow_analysis']?.['risk_signals']['length'])for(const o of a['workflow_analysis']['risk_signals']){k['push']('[workflow_signal]\x20'+o);}if(a['merchant_behavior']?.['red_flags']['length'])for(const p of a['merchant_behavior']['red_flags']){k['push']('[behavior_flag]\x20'+p);}(g==='high'||g==='critical')&&k['push']('[service_nesting]\x20overall\x20nesting\x20risk:\x20'+g+'\x20(score\x20'+e+')');const l=generateAdvice(a,i,j,b);return{'total':i,'base_total':c,'level':j,'dimensions':b,'user_metrics_adjustment':d,'service_nesting_risk':e,'service_nesting_level':g,'red_flags':k,'advice':l};}function generateAdvice(a,b,c,d){const e=[],f=riskLevelEmoji(c),g=RISK_LEVELS['find'](i=>i['level']===c);e['push'](f+'\x20Composite\x20risk\x20score:\x20'+b+'/100\x20('+(g?.['label']??'unknown')+')');if(c==='high')e['push']('🚫\x20Recommend\x20abandoning\x20this\x20order:\x20the\x20risk\x20level\x20is\x20too\x20high;\x20fund\x20safety\x20cannot\x20be\x20guaranteed.');else{if(c==='medium_high')e['push']('⚠️\x20Recommend\x20ordering\x20with\x20caution:\x20be\x20sure\x20to\x20negotiate\x20supplementary\x20terms\x20via\x20Messenger\x20and\x20request\x20a\x20WTS\x20evidence\x20file.');else c==='medium_low'?e['push']('✅\x20You\x20may\x20order:\x20recommend\x20continuously\x20monitoring\x20order\x20progress\x20and\x20keeping\x20communication\x20records.'):e['push']('✅\x20Safe\x20order:\x20you\x20can\x20order\x20with\x20confidence;\x20still\x20recommend\x20enabling\x20order\x20monitoring\x20reminders.');}const h=[...d]['sort']((i,j)=>i['score']/ i['max_score']-j['score']/j['max_score']);for(const i of h){const j=i['max_score']>0x0?i['score']/ i['max_score']:0x0;if(j<0.5){const k=i['checks']['filter'](l=>!l['passed']);if(k['length']>0x0){e['push']('📊\x20'+i['name']+'\x20dimension\x20'+i['score']+'/'+i['max_score']+':\x20'+k['length']+'\x20check(s)\x20failed.');const l=k['find'](n=>n['advice']?.['startsWith']('🔴'));if(l?.['advice'])e['push'](l['advice']);}}}a['completeness']<0.8&&e['push']('ℹ️\x20Information\x20completeness\x20is\x20only\x20'+Math['round'](a['completeness']*0x64)+'%;\x20missing:\x20'+(a['gaps']['join'](',\x20')||'none')+'.\x20Recommend\x20supplementing\x20data\x20before\x20making\x20a\x20decision.');a['workflow_analysis']?.['has_wonder_node']&&e['push']('🌟\x20Machine\x20implements\x20wonder/no-wonder\x20praise\x20design:\x20customers\x20can\x20advance\x20Progress\x20to\x20\x27wonder\x27\x20(positive\x20review)\x20or\x20\x27no_wonder\x27\x20(negative\x20review)\x20after\x20completion.\x20Reward\x20objects\x20can\x20claim\x20against\x20Progress.current\x20==\x20\x27wonder\x27\x20to\x20incentivize\x20positive\x20outcomes.');a['workflow_analysis']?.['has_dispute_anti_pattern']&&e['push']('🔴\x20Machine\x20contains\x20dispute\x20anti-pattern\x20nodes\x20(disputed/refunded/arb/arbitration).\x20Dispute\x20is\x20INDEPENDENT\x20of\x20machine\x20—\x20it\x20flows\x20through\x20Order\x20→\x20Arbitration.dispute()\x20→\x20Arb\x20→\x20arbitration()\x20→\x20arb_withdraw.\x20Arbitrators\x20are\x20configured\x20in\x20Arbitration.voting_guard,\x20NOT\x20in\x20Permission.\x20Recommend\x20the\x20merchant\x20remove\x20these\x20nodes\x20and\x20bind\x20an\x20Arbitration\x20object\x20instead.');if(a['user_metrics']){const n=a['user_metrics'],o=n['metrics']['filter'](p=>p['passed'])['length'];e['push']('📊\x20User-customized\x20metrics:\x20'+o+'/'+n['metrics']['length']+'\x20passed\x20(score\x20'+n['score']+'/100,\x20adjustment\x20'+(n['adjustment']>=0x0?'+':'')+n['adjustment']+').'+(n['source_file']?'\x20Source:\x20'+n['source_file']:''));for(const p of n['metrics']){!p['passed']&&p['advice']&&e['push']('\x20\x20\x20•\x20'+p['label']+':\x20'+p['advice']);}}if(a['service_nesting']){const q=a['service_nesting'];e['push']('🔗\x20Service\x20nesting\x20evaluation:\x20'+q['total_bindings_evaluated']+'\x20bound\x20objects,\x20overall\x20risk\x20'+q['overall_risk_level']+'\x20(score\x20'+q['overall_risk_score']+'/100).'+(q['truncated']?'\x20Recursion\x20truncated\x20at\x20depth\x20limit.':''));}return e;}export function passesRiskThreshold(a,b='medium_high'){const c=['high','medium_high','medium_low','low'],d=c['indexOf'](b),e=c['indexOf'](a['level']);return e>=d;}export{CUSTOMER_INTELLIGENCE_VERSION};

package/dist/customer/types.js

@@ -1,13 +1 @@
-export const CUSTOMER_INTELLIGENCE_VERSION = 1;
-export const RISK_LEVELS = [
-    { min: 85, level: "low", label: "Low risk", color: "🟢" },
-    { min: 70, level: "medium_low", label: "Medium-low risk", color: "🟡" },
-    { min: 50, level: "medium_high", label: "Medium-high risk", color: "🟠" },
-    { min: 0, level: "high", label: "High risk", color: "🔴" },
-];
-export const RISK_DIMENSION_MAX = {
-    workflow: 35,
-    fund: 25,
-    trust: 20,
-    behavior: 20,
-};
+export const CUSTOMER_INTELLIGENCE_VERSION=0x1;export const RISK_LEVELS=[{'min':0x55,'level':'low','label':'Low\x20risk','color':'🟢'},{'min':0x46,'level':'medium_low','label':'Medium-low\x20risk','color':'🟡'},{'min':0x32,'level':'medium_high','label':'Medium-high\x20risk','color':'🟠'},{'min':0x0,'level':'high','label':'High\x20risk','color':'🔴'}];export const RISK_DIMENSION_MAX={'workflow':0x23,'fund':0x19,'trust':0x14,'behavior':0x14};