@torrent-tv/proxy 2.87.4 → 2.87.6

package/services/server/http-responses.js

@@ -1,60 +1,60 @@
-/**
- * Shared HTTP responses used by more than one route.
- */
-/**
- * The answer given when no output suits this viewer: nothing this proxy holds
- * or could produce is admitted by their link. Machine-readable, because the
- * page has to explain it to the viewer and offer what they can do; the
- * figures are the ones the decision was made on.
- *
- * 409 and not a 5xx: nothing is wrong with the proxy, and repeating the same
- * request against the same link gives the same answer.
- *
- * @param {import("fastify").FastifyReply} reply
- * @param {{ reason: string, figures: object | null, wantedKey?: string }} details
- * @returns {import("fastify").FastifyReply}
- */
-export function replyOutputUnavailable(reply, details) {
-  return reply.code(409).send({
-    error: `No output suits this viewer: ${details?.reason ?? "unknown"}.`,
-    outcome: "output-unavailable",
-    reason: details?.reason ?? "",
-    figures: details?.figures ?? null
-  });
-}
-
-/**
- * The answer given when this machine cannot take the output asked for: nothing
- * it has shown it can encode fits, or it has no place for one more encoder.
- * The page answers it by asking the rest of the pool before anything plays.
- *
- * @param {import("fastify").FastifyReply} reply
- * @param {{ reason: string, figures?: object | null }} details
- * @returns {import("fastify").FastifyReply}
- */
-export function replyNoCapacity(reply, details) {
-  return reply.code(409).send({
-    error: `This proxy cannot take this video now: ${details?.reason ?? "unknown"}.`,
-    outcome: "no-capacity",
-    reason: details?.reason ?? "",
-    figures: details?.figures ?? null
-  });
-}
-
-/**
- * The answer given when an address this viewer was already given cannot be
- * given again without risking a piece under a header it may not match. The
- * page answers it by starting a new viewing where the picture is — which is
- * why it is not a "retry": the same request would be answered the same way.
- *
- * @param {import("fastify").FastifyReply} reply
- * @param {{ reason: string }} details
- * @returns {import("fastify").FastifyReply}
- */
-export function replyAssignmentLost(reply, details) {
-  return reply.code(409).send({
-    error: `This part was answered by an output that has gone: ${details?.reason ?? "unknown"}.`,
-    outcome: "assignment-lost",
-    reason: details?.reason ?? ""
-  });
-}
+/**
+ * Shared HTTP responses used by more than one route.
+ */
+/**
+ * The answer given when no output suits this viewer: nothing this proxy holds
+ * or could produce is admitted by their link. Machine-readable, because the
+ * page has to explain it to the viewer and offer what they can do; the
+ * figures are the ones the decision was made on.
+ *
+ * 409 and not a 5xx: nothing is wrong with the proxy, and repeating the same
+ * request against the same link gives the same answer.
+ *
+ * @param {import("fastify").FastifyReply} reply
+ * @param {{ reason: string, figures: object | null, wantedKey?: string }} details
+ * @returns {import("fastify").FastifyReply}
+ */
+export function replyOutputUnavailable(reply, details) {
+  return reply.code(409).send({
+    error: `No output suits this viewer: ${details?.reason ?? "unknown"}.`,
+    outcome: "output-unavailable",
+    reason: details?.reason ?? "",
+    figures: details?.figures ?? null
+  });
+}
+
+/**
+ * The answer given when this machine cannot take the output asked for: nothing
+ * it has shown it can encode fits, or it has no place for one more encoder.
+ * The page answers it by asking the rest of the pool before anything plays.
+ *
+ * @param {import("fastify").FastifyReply} reply
+ * @param {{ reason: string, figures?: object | null }} details
+ * @returns {import("fastify").FastifyReply}
+ */
+export function replyNoCapacity(reply, details) {
+  return reply.code(409).send({
+    error: `This proxy cannot take this video now: ${details?.reason ?? "unknown"}.`,
+    outcome: "no-capacity",
+    reason: details?.reason ?? "",
+    figures: details?.figures ?? null
+  });
+}
+
+/**
+ * The answer given when an address this viewer was already given cannot be
+ * given again without risking a piece under a header it may not match. The
+ * page answers it by starting a new viewing where the picture is — which is
+ * why it is not a "retry": the same request would be answered the same way.
+ *
+ * @param {import("fastify").FastifyReply} reply
+ * @param {{ reason: string }} details
+ * @returns {import("fastify").FastifyReply}
+ */
+export function replyAssignmentLost(reply, details) {
+  return reply.code(409).send({
+    error: `This part was answered by an output that has gone: ${details?.reason ?? "unknown"}.`,
+    outcome: "assignment-lost",
+    reason: details?.reason ?? ""
+  });
+}