@oneuptime/common 14.0.8 → 14.0.10

package/Tests/Server/Utils/Workspace/MicrosoftTeamsCreateCommandsEndToEnd.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,4672 @@
+/** @timezone Asia/Tokyo */
+import {
+  afterAll,
+  afterEach,
+  beforeAll,
+  beforeEach,
+  describe,
+  expect,
+  jest,
+  test,
+} from "@jest/globals";
+import type { SpyInstance } from "jest-mock";
+import http from "http";
+import type { AddressInfo } from "net";
+import util from "util";
+import moment from "moment-timezone";
+
+/*
+ * Issue #4111, end to end: in Microsoft Teams, "create incident" and "create
+ * maintenance" answered "Sorry, I encountered an error processing your
+ * request. Please try again later." - and every such bubble showed up TWICE -
+ * while "show scheduled maintenance" worked.
+ *
+ * What master (14.0.8) did, which this file was first written to reproduce:
+ * the form listed every monitor, label and on-call policy of the project, so
+ * with a few hundred monitors the card was over Teams' size limit. The Bot
+ * Connector answered 413 MessageSizeTooBig -> the handler replied "Sorry..."
+ * and rethrew -> the CloudAdapter (it has no onTurnError) answered Teams HTTP
+ * 500 -> Teams delivered the same activity again -> a second "Sorry..."
+ * bubble. Any failure doubled that way, not only the 413.
+ *
+ * What these tests pin, the fixed behaviour: every inbound turn is answered
+ * HTTP 200 (an invoke with its invoke response) and a message gets exactly
+ * one reply; the form is fitted to a size budget and names what it left off;
+ * a card Teams refuses as too large is sent again smaller and then replaced
+ * by a text that says why, while any other refusal is explained at once; a
+ * redelivered activity id is dropped, even while its first delivery is still
+ * being handled; a submitted form is confirmed before the form is removed,
+ * neither a confirmation Teams refuses nor a removal that fails is reported
+ * as a failed create, and a create OneUptime refuses keeps the form and says
+ * why.
+ *
+ * And what the review of that fix changed, pinned here end to end as well:
+ * the sender of a create command is checked before the form only in a
+ * personal chat (in a channel or group chat anyone there may submit it, and
+ * the submit checks whoever does); the maintenance form names the zone its
+ * times are read in, a submit is read in that zone first, and a reply read at
+ * a bare UTC offset says so; a start that has just gone by (five minutes at
+ * most) begins now; a submit pointing at a record the project does not have
+ * gets a fixed answer that never names another project's record; an
+ * unexpected failure links to creating the thing in OneUptime; no form action
+ * that happened is reported as failed because Teams refused its confirmation;
+ * a question for the AI assistant whose account lookup fails gets the one
+ * generic answer, not "connect your account"; and every failure is logged as
+ * one line that names the command, never a question's text, followed by the
+ * error itself - unless it is a Bot Connector HTTP error, whose status and
+ * code say it all.
+ *
+ * Every other Teams test in Common drives MicrosoftTeamsUtil with a fake
+ * TurnContext, because Common's jest config maps botbuilder,
+ * botframework-connector and @azure/* to tiny stubs. That cannot show what the
+ * Bot Connector does with an oversized reply, nor what the real CloudAdapter
+ * answers Teams when a turn throws. So this file runs the REAL botbuilder
+ * stack end to end:
+ *
+ *   fake Express req -> MicrosoftTeamsUtil.processBotActivity
+ *     -> real CloudAdapter.process -> real TeamsActivityHandler
+ *     -> handleBotMessageActivity -> real TurnContext.sendActivity
+ *     -> real ConnectorClient (@azure/core-client pipeline) -> HTTP
+ *     -> fake Bot Connector on 127.0.0.1 (records every POST and DELETE,
+ *        answers 413 MessageSizeTooBig above a UTF-16 size limit, like Teams,
+ *        and any other refusal a test asks for)
+ *   and back: RestError -> handler -> CloudAdapter.process -> HTTP status.
+ *
+ * How the real botbuilder gets in (the moduleNameMapper stubs win otherwise):
+ *
+ * - jest.mock("botbuilder", factory) still works although the name is
+ *   moduleNameMapper-mapped: jest keys explicit mocks by the resolved path, and
+ *   both the mock registration and every importer resolve "botbuilder" to the
+ *   same mapped stub path, so the factory result replaces the stub for this
+ *   file's whole module registry (MicrosoftTeams.ts and Actions/* included).
+ *
+ * - The factory must load botbuilder with NODE's require, not jest's. Inside
+ *   jest, require("module") is jest's own shim whose createRequire() returns
+ *   a jest-registry require - it still applies moduleNameMapper and hands back
+ *   the 7-key stub. process.getBuiltinModule("module") (Node >= 22.3; CI runs
+ *   Node 26) is not shimmed and returns the real node:module, so its
+ *   createRequire() loads botbuilder and all of its dependencies
+ *   (botbuilder-core, botframework-connector, @azure/*, zod...) through
+ *   Node's own loader, outside jest's registry and mapper.
+ *
+ * - Consequence: the real stack lives in the worker's OUTER realm (real Node
+ *   globals), while the code under test runs in the jsdom test realm. Errors
+ *   the connector throws are outer-realm Errors, so `err instanceof Error` is
+ *   FALSE in this file and in the code under test here (it is true in
+ *   production, where there is one realm). That is one reason the production
+ *   code recognizes connector errors by their fields (statusCode, code), not
+ *   by their class. CloudAdapter.process likewise logs with the outer realm's
+ *   console, which is what outerConsole below watches.
+ *
+ * Authentication: the adapter is built with no MicrosoftAppId, so
+ * botframework-connector reports authentication disabled - a request with no
+ * Authorization header is accepted anonymously and outbound connector calls
+ * carry no bearer token. Everything after authentication is the production
+ * path. The adapter is injected as MicrosoftTeamsUtil's cached adapter, so
+ * processBotActivity uses it exactly as it would use the one getBotAdapter()
+ * builds (which, like this one, has no onTurnError).
+ *
+ * Teams redelivery is the one step this file cannot run for real. Microsoft
+ * documents that Teams retries a turn that takes over 15 seconds, and resends
+ * activities after transient failures; the customer's two identical bubbles a
+ * few seconds apart were one such redelivery after our HTTP 500.
+ * deliverLikeTeams() simulates it: after a 5xx answer, or no answer at all,
+ * it delivers the same activity (same id) once more, as Teams does. The retry
+ * of a slow turn is simulated by holding the first delivery up in a database
+ * read and delivering the same activity again meanwhile.
+ *
+ * Only the seams that touch the database are stubbed: the project's lists,
+ * tenant resolution, the chat and team install capture, the sender check (or
+ * the tables under it: the account link, the memberships and permissions),
+ * the dashboard URL, the reference check (or the records it reads) and the
+ * final create. The bot drops an activity id it has already handled for ten
+ * minutes (in this process's memory, as Redis is not connected here; one test
+ * gives the process a Redis client whose connection is down), so every test
+ * sends activities with ids of its own - see nextActivityId().
+ *
+ * The worker runs in Asia/Tokyo (the docblock on the first line), a zone no
+ * sender here is in, so a maintenance window read in the server's zone
+ * instead of the sender's cannot pass on any machine. A test that needs the
+ * time of day stops the test realm's Date alone (stopTheClockAt); timers stay
+ * real, and the botbuilder stack reads the outer realm's clock anyway.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Real botbuilder through Node's loader - see the header. Self-contained,
+ * because jest hoists this call above every import and declaration.
+ */
+jest.mock("botbuilder", () => {
+  const nodeModuleBuiltin: typeof import("module") =
+    typeof process.getBuiltinModule === "function"
+      ? process.getBuiltinModule("module")
+      : // Fallback: jest's shim subclasses the real Module class.
+        Object.getPrototypeOf(jest.requireActual("module"));
+
+  return nodeModuleBuiltin.createRequire(__filename)("botbuilder");
+});
+
+jest.mock("../../../../Server/EnvironmentConfig", () => {
+  return {
+    ...(jest.requireActual("../../../../Server/EnvironmentConfig") as Record<
+      string,
+      unknown
+    >),
+    MicrosoftTeamsAppClientId: "11111111-2222-3333-4444-555555555555",
+    MicrosoftTeamsAppClientSecret: "test-secret",
+    MicrosoftTeamsAppTenantId: "test-tenant",
+  };
+});
+
+import MicrosoftTeamsUtil, {
+  MicrosoftTeamsTenantResolution,
+} from "../../../../Server/Utils/Workspace/MicrosoftTeams/MicrosoftTeams";
+import MicrosoftTeamsAuthAction, {
+  MicrosoftTeamsAccountNotLinkedException,
+} from "../../../../Server/Utils/Workspace/MicrosoftTeams/Actions/Auth";
+import {
+  MicrosoftTeamsAlertActionType,
+  MicrosoftTeamsAlertEpisodeActionType,
+  MicrosoftTeamsIncidentActionType,
+  MicrosoftTeamsIncidentEpisodeActionType,
+  MicrosoftTeamsScheduledMaintenanceActionType,
+} from "../../../../Server/Utils/Workspace/MicrosoftTeams/Actions/ActionTypes";
+import {
+  MICROSOFT_TEAMS_MAX_CHOICE_TITLE_LENGTH,
+  MICROSOFT_TEAMS_MAX_MONITOR_CHOICES,
+} from "../../../../Server/Utils/Workspace/MicrosoftTeams/MicrosoftTeamsCardChoices";
+import MicrosoftTeamsMessageSize, {
+  MICROSOFT_TEAMS_CARD_SIZE_BUDGETS_IN_BYTES,
+  MICROSOFT_TEAMS_TEXT_MESSAGE_BUDGET_IN_BYTES,
+} from "../../../../Server/Utils/Workspace/MicrosoftTeams/MicrosoftTeamsMessageSize";
+import MicrosoftTeamsReplies, {
+  MICROSOFT_TEAMS_UNAVAILABLE_REFERENCE_MESSAGE,
+} from "../../../../Server/Utils/Workspace/MicrosoftTeams/MicrosoftTeamsReplies";
+import WorkspaceActionAuthorization from "../../../../Server/Utils/Workspace/WorkspaceActionAuthorization";
+import WorkspaceProjectReferenceValidator from "../../../../Server/Utils/Workspace/WorkspaceProjectReferenceValidator";
+import { ProjectScopedReferenceException } from "../../../../Server/Utils/Database/ProjectScopedReferenceValidator";
+import DatabaseConfig from "../../../../Server/DatabaseConfig";
+import GlobalCache from "../../../../Server/Infrastructure/GlobalCache";
+import Redis from "../../../../Server/Infrastructure/Redis";
+import AccessTokenService from "../../../../Server/Services/AccessTokenService";
+import AlertEpisodeInternalNoteService from "../../../../Server/Services/AlertEpisodeInternalNoteService";
+import AlertEpisodeService from "../../../../Server/Services/AlertEpisodeService";
+import AlertInternalNoteService from "../../../../Server/Services/AlertInternalNoteService";
+import AlertService from "../../../../Server/Services/AlertService";
+import IncidentEpisodeInternalNoteService from "../../../../Server/Services/IncidentEpisodeInternalNoteService";
+import IncidentEpisodeService from "../../../../Server/Services/IncidentEpisodeService";
+import IncidentPublicNoteService from "../../../../Server/Services/IncidentPublicNoteService";
+import IncidentService from "../../../../Server/Services/IncidentService";
+import IncidentSeverityService from "../../../../Server/Services/IncidentSeverityService";
+import IncidentStateService from "../../../../Server/Services/IncidentStateService";
+import LabelService from "../../../../Server/Services/LabelService";
+import MonitorService from "../../../../Server/Services/MonitorService";
+import MonitorStatusService from "../../../../Server/Services/MonitorStatusService";
+import OnCallDutyPolicyService from "../../../../Server/Services/OnCallDutyPolicyService";
+import ScheduledMaintenancePublicNoteService from "../../../../Server/Services/ScheduledMaintenancePublicNoteService";
+import ScheduledMaintenanceService from "../../../../Server/Services/ScheduledMaintenanceService";
+import TeamMemberService from "../../../../Server/Services/TeamMemberService";
+import WorkspaceUserAuthTokenService from "../../../../Server/Services/WorkspaceUserAuthTokenService";
+import AlertEpisodeInternalNote from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/AlertEpisodeInternalNote";
+import AlertInternalNote from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/AlertInternalNote";
+import Incident from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Incident";
+import IncidentEpisodeInternalNote from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/IncidentEpisodeInternalNote";
+import IncidentPublicNote from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/IncidentPublicNote";
+import IncidentSeverity from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/IncidentSeverity";
+import IncidentState from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/IncidentState";
+import Label from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Label";
+import Monitor from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Monitor";
+import MonitorStatus from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/MonitorStatus";
+import OnCallDutyPolicy from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/OnCallDutyPolicy";
+import ScheduledMaintenance from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/ScheduledMaintenance";
+import ScheduledMaintenancePublicNote from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/ScheduledMaintenancePublicNote";
+import TeamMember from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/TeamMember";
+import WorkspaceProjectAuthToken from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/WorkspaceProjectAuthToken";
+import URL from "../../../../Types/API/URL";
+import BadDataException from "../../../../Types/Exception/BadDataException";
+import NotAuthorizedException from "../../../../Types/Exception/NotAuthorizedException";
+import DatabaseCommonInteractionProps from "../../../../Types/BaseDatabase/DatabaseCommonInteractionProps";
+import { JSONObject } from "../../../../Types/JSON";
+import ObjectID from "../../../../Types/ObjectID";
+import Permission, {
+  UserPermission,
+  UserTenantAccessPermission,
+} from "../../../../Types/Permission";
+import PositiveNumber from "../../../../Types/PositiveNumber";
+import ErrorClass from "../../../../Types/Telemetry/ErrorClass";
+import { ERROR_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE_KEY } from "../../../../Types/Telemetry/UnitOfWork";
+import {
+  ExpressRequest,
+  ExpressResponse,
+} from "../../../../Server/Utils/Express";
+import logger, { LogAttributes } from "../../../../Server/Utils/Logger";
+import {
+  Activity,
+  CloudAdapter,
+  ConfigurationBotFrameworkAuthentication,
+  ResourceResponse,
+  TeamsActivityHandler,
+  TeamsInfo,
+  TurnContext,
+} from "botbuilder";
+
+// ---- Real Node (the outer realm) ----
+
+type NodeModuleBuiltin = typeof import("module");
+
+function getRealNodeModuleBuiltin(): NodeModuleBuiltin {
+  if (typeof process.getBuiltinModule === "function") {
+    return process.getBuiltinModule("module");
+  }
+
+  return Object.getPrototypeOf(
+    jest.requireActual("module"),
+  ) as NodeModuleBuiltin;
+}
+
+// Node's own require, rooted at this file: outside jest's registry and mapper.
+const nativeRequire: NodeJS.Require =
+  getRealNodeModuleBuiltin().createRequire(__filename);
+
+/*
+ * The outer realm's console: CloudAdapter.process console.error()s a turn
+ * that threw, just before it answers Teams with HTTP 500. (jest replaces only
+ * the test realm's console.)
+ */
+const outerConsole: Console = nativeRequire("console") as Console;
+
+// ---- Fake Bot Connector ----
+
+/*
+ * Microsoft Learn ("Message size limits"): a bot message may be about 100 KB,
+ * measured as UTF-16, and Teams refuses a larger one with HTTP 413 and code
+ * MessageSizeTooBig. Tests lower the limit to make Teams refuse a card.
+ */
+const TEAMS_MESSAGE_LIMIT_IN_UTF16_BYTES: number = 100 * 1024;
+
+/*
+ * What the fixed forms are built to: the first card budget, 40 KiB. Written
+ * out rather than read from MICROSOFT_TEAMS_CARD_SIZE_BUDGETS_IN_BYTES, so a
+ * looser budget fails here instead of moving the bar with it.
+ */
+const CARD_BUDGET_IN_UTF16_BYTES: number = 40 * 1024;
+
+// A card's or a text's size as Teams measures it: UTF-16, two bytes a unit.
+function toUtf16Bytes(value: string | JSONObject): number {
+  return (typeof value === "string" ? value : JSON.stringify(value)).length * 2;
+}
+
+const MESSAGE_SIZE_TOO_BIG_BODY: JSONObject = {
+  error: { code: "MessageSizeTooBig", message: "Message size too large." },
+};
+
+const ACTIVITY_NOT_FOUND_BODY: JSONObject = {
+  error: { code: "NotFound", message: "The activity could not be found." },
+};
+
+// Send, reply and delete, as botframework-connector calls them.
+const ACTIVITIES_PATH: RegExp =
+  /^\/v3\/conversations\/([^/]+)\/activities(?:\/([^/]+))?$/;
+
+interface ConnectorRequestRecord {
+  method: string;
+  path: string;
+  conversationId: string | null;
+  // POST: the activity replied to. DELETE: the activity removed.
+  activityIdInPath: string | null;
+  // The request body's size as Teams measures it: UTF-16, two bytes a unit.
+  wireUtf16Bytes: number;
+  answeredStatus: number;
+  answeredBody: JSONObject;
+  activity: JSONObject | null;
+}
+
+interface ConnectorAnswer {
+  status: number;
+  body: JSONObject;
+}
+
+// A request to the activities API, as a refusal rule sees it.
+interface ConnectorRequest {
+  method: string;
+  activity: JSONObject | null;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Refusals the connector gives up on at once (its pipeline retries 408, 5xx
+ * but 501 and 505, and a 429 or 503 that says when to retry): Teams refusing
+ * a message outright, and refusing a card for a reason other than its size.
+ */
+const MESSAGE_REFUSED_ANSWER: ConnectorAnswer = {
+  status: 403,
+  body: { error: { code: "Forbidden", message: "The message was refused." } },
+};
+
+const CARD_REFUSED_ANSWER: ConnectorAnswer = {
+  status: 400,
+  body: { error: { code: "BadArgument", message: "The card was refused." } },
+};
+
+// Whether a request posts an adaptive card, such as the form.
+function isCardPost(request: ConnectorRequest): boolean {
+  return (
+    request.method === "POST" &&
+    asObjectArray(request.activity?.["attachments"]).length > 0
+  );
+}
+
+interface FakeBotConnector {
+  serviceUrl: string;
+  requests: Array<ConnectorRequestRecord>;
+  // A POST larger than this is refused with 413 MessageSizeTooBig.
+  maxUtf16Bytes: number;
+  // What a DELETE of an activity is answered with.
+  deleteStatus: number;
+  /*
+   * When set, a request this returns an answer for is refused with it, e.g.
+   * to make Teams refuse one particular message.
+   */
+  refuse: ((request: ConnectorRequest) => ConnectorAnswer | null) | null;
+  close: () => Promise<void>;
+}
+
+async function startFakeBotConnector(): Promise<FakeBotConnector> {
+  let nextMessageNumber: number = 0;
+
+  const fakeConnector: FakeBotConnector = {
+    serviceUrl: "",
+    requests: [],
+    maxUtf16Bytes: TEAMS_MESSAGE_LIMIT_IN_UTF16_BYTES,
+    deleteStatus: 200,
+    refuse: null,
+    close: async (): Promise<void> => {
+      return undefined;
+    },
+  };
+
+  const server: http.Server = http.createServer(
+    (req: http.IncomingMessage, res: http.ServerResponse) => {
+      let bodyText: string = "";
+      req.setEncoding("utf8");
+      req.on("data", (chunk: string) => {
+        bodyText += chunk;
+      });
+      req.on("end", () => {
+        const path: string = (req.url || "/").split("?")[0] || "/";
+        const match: RegExpExecArray | null = ACTIVITIES_PATH.exec(path);
+        const wireUtf16Bytes: number = bodyText.length * 2;
+
+        let activity: JSONObject | null = null;
+        try {
+          activity = bodyText ? (JSON.parse(bodyText) as JSONObject) : null;
+        } catch {
+          activity = null;
+        }
+
+        let answeredStatus: number = 404;
+        let answeredBody: JSONObject = {
+          error: {
+            code: "NotFound",
+            message: `The fake connector has no route for ${req.method} ${path}`,
+          },
+        };
+
+        const refusal: ConnectorAnswer | null =
+          match && fakeConnector.refuse
+            ? fakeConnector.refuse({
+                method: req.method || "",
+                activity: activity,
+              })
+            : null;
+
+        if (refusal) {
+          answeredStatus = refusal.status;
+          answeredBody = refusal.body;
+        } else if (req.method === "POST" && match) {
+          if (wireUtf16Bytes > fakeConnector.maxUtf16Bytes) {
+            answeredStatus = 413;
+            answeredBody = MESSAGE_SIZE_TOO_BIG_BODY;
+          } else {
+            nextMessageNumber++;
+            answeredStatus = 200;
+            answeredBody = { id: `msg-${nextMessageNumber}` };
+          }
+        } else if (req.method === "DELETE" && match?.[2]) {
+          answeredStatus = fakeConnector.deleteStatus;
+          answeredBody =
+            fakeConnector.deleteStatus < 300 ? {} : ACTIVITY_NOT_FOUND_BODY;
+        }
+
+        fakeConnector.requests.push({
+          method: req.method || "",
+          path: path,
+          conversationId: match?.[1] ? decodeURIComponent(match[1]) : null,
+          activityIdInPath: match?.[2] ? decodeURIComponent(match[2]) : null,
+          wireUtf16Bytes: wireUtf16Bytes,
+          answeredStatus: answeredStatus,
+          answeredBody: answeredBody,
+          activity: activity,
+        });
+
+        res.writeHead(answeredStatus, {
+          "Content-Type": "application/json; charset=utf-8",
+        });
+        res.end(JSON.stringify(answeredBody));
+      });
+    },
+  );
+
+  await new Promise<void>((resolve: () => void) => {
+    server.listen(0, "127.0.0.1", () => {
+      resolve();
+    });
+  });
+
+  const address: AddressInfo = server.address() as AddressInfo;
+  fakeConnector.serviceUrl = `http://127.0.0.1:${address.port}/`;
+  fakeConnector.close = async (): Promise<void> => {
+    server.closeAllConnections();
+    await new Promise<void>((resolve: () => void) => {
+      server.close(() => {
+        resolve();
+      });
+    });
+  };
+
+  return fakeConnector;
+}
+
+// ---- Fake Express response: what Teams gets back ----
+
+class RecordingResponse {
+  // Null until the bot answers, so a delivery nobody answered never reads as 200.
+  public statusCode: number | null = null;
+  public body: unknown = undefined;
+  public ended: boolean = false;
+  public headersSent: boolean = false;
+  public headers: Record<string, string> = {};
+
+  public status(code: number): this {
+    this.statusCode = code;
+    return this;
+  }
+
+  public send(body?: unknown): this {
+    this.body = body;
+    this.headersSent = true;
+    return this;
+  }
+
+  public json(body?: unknown): this {
+    this.body = body;
+    this.headersSent = true;
+    return this;
+  }
+
+  public end(): this {
+    this.ended = true;
+    this.headersSent = true;
+    return this;
+  }
+
+  public header(name: string, value: string): this {
+    this.headers[name.toLowerCase()] = value;
+    return this;
+  }
+
+  public setHeader(name: string, value: string): this {
+    return this.header(name, value);
+  }
+}
+
+// ---- The real adapter under test ----
+
+type CachedAdapterSlot = { cachedAdapter: CloudAdapter | null };
+
+interface RealAdapterUnderTest {
+  adapter: CloudAdapter;
+  // Every error that escaped adapter.sendActivities, i.e. turnContext.sendActivity.
+  sendActivitiesErrors: Array<unknown>;
+}
+
+function installRealCloudAdapter(): RealAdapterUnderTest {
+  const adapter: CloudAdapter = new CloudAdapter(
+    new ConfigurationBotFrameworkAuthentication({}),
+  );
+
+  const sendActivitiesErrors: Array<unknown> = [];
+  const realSendActivities: CloudAdapter["sendActivities"] =
+    adapter.sendActivities.bind(adapter);
+
+  // A transparent tap: it records and rethrows, so behaviour is unchanged.
+  adapter.sendActivities = async (
+    context: TurnContext,
+    activities: Array<Partial<Activity>>,
+  ): Promise<Array<ResourceResponse>> => {
+    try {
+      return await realSendActivities(context, activities);
+    } catch (error) {
+      sendActivitiesErrors.push(error);
+      throw error;
+    }
+  };
+
+  (MicrosoftTeamsUtil as unknown as CachedAdapterSlot).cachedAdapter = adapter;
+
+  return { adapter, sendActivitiesErrors };
+}
+
+// ---- The project behind the bot (only the database seams are stubbed) ----
+
+const TENANT_ID: string = "4111aaaa-bbbb-4ccc-8ddd-eeeeeeeeeeee";
+const BOT_ID: string = "28:oneuptime-bot-app-id";
+const BOT_NAME: string = "OneUptime";
+const SENDER_AAD_OBJECT_ID: string = "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000004111";
+const PERSONAL_CONVERSATION_ID: string = "a:4111-personal-chat";
+const GROUP_CONVERSATION_ID: string = "19:group-chat-4111@thread.v2";
+const CHANNEL_CONVERSATION_ID: string = "19:ops-channel-4111@thread.tacv2";
+const TEAM_ID: string = "19:ops-team-4111@thread.tacv2";
+const SENDER_TIMEZONE: string = "America/New_York";
+const DASHBOARD_URL: string = "https://oneuptime.example.com/dashboard";
+const ONEUPTIME_USER_ID: ObjectID = ObjectID.generate();
+
+const INCIDENT_ADD_LATER_HINT: string =
+  "You can add them to the incident in OneUptime after it is created.";
+const MAINTENANCE_ADD_LATER_HINT: string =
+  "You can add them to the event in OneUptime after it is created.";
+
+type NamedRow = { _id: string; name: string };
+
+interface ProjectShape {
+  monitors: number;
+  labels?: number | undefined;
+  onCallPolicies?: number | undefined;
+  severities?: number | undefined;
+  monitorStatuses?: number | undefined;
+  // Monitor, label and on-call policy names of 100 characters.
+  longNames?: boolean | undefined;
+}
+
+// Every record the project has, in the order the bot reads them.
+interface ProjectData {
+  monitors: Array<NamedRow>;
+  labels: Array<NamedRow>;
+  onCallPolicies: Array<NamedRow>;
+  severities: Array<NamedRow>;
+  monitorStatuses: Array<NamedRow>;
+}
+
+const LONG_NAME_TAIL: string =
+  " - checkout, payments and identity services in eu-west-1, us-east-1 and ap-southeast-2";
+
+function padded(index: number, width: number): string {
+  return String(index).padStart(width, "0");
+}
+
+function toLongName(name: string): string {
+  return (name + LONG_NAME_TAIL + LONG_NAME_TAIL).substring(0, 100);
+}
+
+function namedRows(
+  count: number,
+  nameFor: (index: number) => string,
+): Array<NamedRow> {
+  const rows: Array<NamedRow> = [];
+  for (let index: number = 1; index <= count; index++) {
+    rows.push({ _id: ObjectID.generate().toString(), name: nameFor(index) });
+  }
+  return rows;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The rows a findBy for this query returns: the project's rows (generated in
+ * the query's sort order) up to the query's limit, as the database would.
+ */
+function firstRowsFor(rows: Array<NamedRow>, findBy: unknown): Array<NamedRow> {
+  const limit: unknown = (findBy as { limit?: unknown } | undefined)?.limit;
+
+  if (typeof limit === "number") {
+    return rows.slice(0, limit);
+  }
+
+  if (limit instanceof PositiveNumber) {
+    return rows.slice(0, limit.toNumber());
+  }
+
+  return rows;
+}
+
+function stubProjectData(shape: ProjectShape): ProjectData {
+  const name: (value: string) => string = (value: string): string => {
+    return shape.longNames ? toLongName(value) : value;
+  };
+
+  const data: ProjectData = {
+    // 30 characters each, e.g. "Production HTTP Monitor 000001".
+    monitors: namedRows(shape.monitors, (index: number) => {
+      return name(`Production HTTP Monitor ${padded(index, 6)}`);
+    }),
+    labels: namedRows(shape.labels ?? 20, (index: number) => {
+      return name(`team:platform-${padded(index, 3)}`);
+    }),
+    onCallPolicies: namedRows(shape.onCallPolicies ?? 10, (index: number) => {
+      return name(`Primary On-Call Policy ${padded(index, 3)}`);
+    }),
+    severities: namedRows(shape.severities ?? 4, (index: number) => {
+      return name(`Severity Level ${padded(index, 2)}`);
+    }),
+    monitorStatuses: namedRows(shape.monitorStatuses ?? 4, (index: number) => {
+      return name(
+        ["Operational", "Degraded", "Offline", "Under Maintenance"][
+          index - 1
+        ] || `Status ${padded(index, 2)}`,
+      );
+    }),
+  };
+
+  // Re-spying a spied method returns the same spy, so this just swaps rows.
+  jest.spyOn(MonitorService, "findBy").mockImplementation((findBy: unknown) => {
+    return Promise.resolve(
+      firstRowsFor(data.monitors, findBy) as unknown as Array<Monitor>,
+    );
+  });
+  jest
+    .spyOn(MonitorService, "countBy")
+    .mockResolvedValue(new PositiveNumber(data.monitors.length));
+
+  jest.spyOn(LabelService, "findBy").mockImplementation((findBy: unknown) => {
+    return Promise.resolve(
+      firstRowsFor(data.labels, findBy) as unknown as Array<Label>,
+    );
+  });
+  jest
+    .spyOn(LabelService, "countBy")
+    .mockResolvedValue(new PositiveNumber(data.labels.length));
+
+  jest
+    .spyOn(OnCallDutyPolicyService, "findBy")
+    .mockImplementation((findBy: unknown) => {
+      return Promise.resolve(
+        firstRowsFor(
+          data.onCallPolicies,
+          findBy,
+        ) as unknown as Array<OnCallDutyPolicy>,
+      );
+    });
+  jest
+    .spyOn(OnCallDutyPolicyService, "countBy")
+    .mockResolvedValue(new PositiveNumber(data.onCallPolicies.length));
+
+  jest
+    .spyOn(IncidentSeverityService, "findBy")
+    .mockImplementation((findBy: unknown) => {
+      return Promise.resolve(
+        firstRowsFor(
+          data.severities,
+          findBy,
+        ) as unknown as Array<IncidentSeverity>,
+      );
+    });
+
+  jest
+    .spyOn(MonitorStatusService, "findBy")
+    .mockImplementation((findBy: unknown) => {
+      return Promise.resolve(
+        firstRowsFor(
+          data.monitorStatuses,
+          findBy,
+        ) as unknown as Array<MonitorStatus>,
+      );
+    });
+
+  return data;
+}
+
+function stubTenantAndInstallCapture(forProjectId: ObjectID): void {
+  jest.spyOn(MicrosoftTeamsUtil, "resolveProjectByTenantId").mockResolvedValue({
+    projectAuth: {
+      projectId: forProjectId,
+    } as unknown as WorkspaceProjectAuthToken,
+    isAmbiguous: false,
+    candidateProjectIds: [forProjectId],
+  } as MicrosoftTeamsTenantResolution);
+
+  jest
+    .spyOn(
+      MicrosoftTeamsUtil as unknown as {
+        captureChatFromBotActivity: () => Promise<void>;
+      },
+      "captureChatFromBotActivity",
+    )
+    .mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+
+  jest
+    .spyOn(MicrosoftTeamsUtil, "captureTeamFromBotActivity")
+    .mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+}
+
+// The sender has a connected account and is a member who may create things.
+function stubSenderCheck(forProjectId: ObjectID): void {
+  jest
+    .spyOn(MicrosoftTeamsAuthAction, "getOneUptimeUserIdFromTeamsUserId")
+    .mockResolvedValue(ONEUPTIME_USER_ID);
+
+  jest
+    .spyOn(WorkspaceActionAuthorization, "getProjectMemberProps")
+    .mockResolvedValue({
+      userId: ONEUPTIME_USER_ID,
+      tenantId: forProjectId,
+    } as DatabaseCommonInteractionProps);
+
+  jest
+    .spyOn(WorkspaceActionAuthorization, "assertCanCreate")
+    .mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+}
+
+/*
+ * The real membership and permission checks (getProjectMemberProps and
+ * assertCanCreate) in place of the stubs above, over the reads under them:
+ * the sender's accepted memberships and their permissions in the project.
+ * Null: the linked user holds no accepted membership in the project any
+ * more. assertCanCreate stays watched.
+ */
+function useRealMembershipCheck(permissions: Array<Permission> | null): void {
+  jest
+    .spyOn(WorkspaceActionAuthorization, "getProjectMemberProps")
+    .mockRestore();
+  jest.spyOn(WorkspaceActionAuthorization, "assertCanCreate").mockRestore();
+  jest.spyOn(WorkspaceActionAuthorization, "assertCanCreate");
+
+  const memberships: Array<TeamMember> = [];
+  if (permissions) {
+    const membership: TeamMember = new TeamMember();
+    membership.teamId = ObjectID.generate();
+    memberships.push(membership);
+  }
+
+  const tenantPermission: UserTenantAccessPermission | null = permissions
+    ? {
+        _type: "UserTenantAccessPermission",
+        projectId: projectId,
+        permissions: permissions.map(
+          (permission: Permission): UserPermission => {
+            return {
+              _type: "UserPermission",
+              permission: permission,
+              isBlockPermission: false,
+              labelIds: [],
+            };
+          },
+        ),
+      }
+    : null;
+
+  jest.spyOn(TeamMemberService, "findBy").mockResolvedValue(memberships);
+  jest
+    .spyOn(AccessTokenService, "getUserGlobalAccessPermission")
+    .mockResolvedValue(null);
+  jest
+    .spyOn(AccessTokenService, "getUserTenantAccessPermission")
+    .mockResolvedValue(tenantPermission);
+}
+
+function stubDashboardUrl(): void {
+  jest.spyOn(DatabaseConfig, "getDashboardUrl").mockImplementation(() => {
+    return Promise.resolve(URL.fromString(DASHBOARD_URL));
+  });
+}
+
+// ---- Teams activities ----
+
+let activityCounter: number = 0;
+
+/*
+ * Unique to this run, so an id claimed by an earlier run can never be taken
+ * for a redelivery, even by a claim store that outlives the process.
+ */
+const RUN_TOKEN: string = ObjectID.generate().toString().substring(0, 8);
+
+/*
+ * A fresh activity id. The bot drops an id it has seen in the same
+ * conversation (see the header), so tests must not share one.
+ */
+function nextActivityId(label: string): string {
+  activityCounter++;
+  return `4111-${RUN_TOKEN}-${label}-${activityCounter}`;
+}
+
+type ConversationKind = "personal" | "groupChat" | "channel";
+
+const SENDER: JSONObject = {
+  id: "29:1customer-user",
+  name: "Customer User",
+  aadObjectId: SENDER_AAD_OBJECT_ID,
+};
+
+// Someone else in a group chat or channel, who fills in a form posted there.
+const OTHER_MEMBER: JSONObject = {
+  id: "29:1another-user",
+  name: "Another User",
+  aadObjectId: "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000004112",
+};
+
+const BOT: JSONObject = { id: BOT_ID, name: BOT_NAME };
+
+function buildConversation(kind: ConversationKind): JSONObject {
+  if (kind === "groupChat") {
+    return {
+      conversationType: "groupChat",
+      tenantId: TENANT_ID,
+      id: GROUP_CONVERSATION_ID,
+      isGroup: true,
+    };
+  }
+
+  if (kind === "channel") {
+    return {
+      conversationType: "channel",
+      tenantId: TENANT_ID,
+      id: CHANNEL_CONVERSATION_ID,
+      isGroup: true,
+    };
+  }
+
+  return {
+    conversationType: "personal",
+    tenantId: TENANT_ID,
+    id: PERSONAL_CONVERSATION_ID,
+  };
+}
+
+// What Teams puts in channelData: the tenant, and in a channel its team.
+function buildChannelData(kind: ConversationKind): JSONObject {
+  return kind === "channel"
+    ? {
+        tenant: { id: TENANT_ID },
+        team: { id: TEAM_ID, name: "Operations" },
+        channel: { id: CHANNEL_CONVERSATION_ID, name: "incidents" },
+      }
+    : { tenant: { id: TENANT_ID } };
+}
+
+// Teams' clientInfo entity; it names the sender's zone when Teams knows it.
+function buildClientInfo(timezone: string | undefined): JSONObject {
+  return {
+    type: "clientInfo",
+    locale: "en-US",
+    country: "US",
+    platform: "Web",
+    ...(timezone ? { timezone: timezone } : {}),
+  };
+}
+
+/*
+ * A message typed to the bot: in a 1:1 chat, or with an @mention in a group
+ * chat or a channel.
+ */
+function buildMessageActivity(options: {
+  id: string;
+  text: string;
+  conversation?: ConversationKind | undefined;
+  // The IANA zone Teams puts on the activity itself.
+  localTimezone?: string | undefined;
+  // The zone in the clientInfo entity: localTimezone's, unless given (even as undefined).
+  clientInfoTimezone?: string | undefined;
+}): JSONObject {
+  const conversation: ConversationKind = options.conversation || "personal";
+  const isMention: boolean = conversation !== "personal";
+  const timezone: string | undefined = options.localTimezone;
+  const clientInfoTimezone: string | undefined =
+    "clientInfoTimezone" in options ? options.clientInfoTimezone : timezone;
+
+  return {
+    type: "message",
+    id: options.id,
+    timestamp: "2026-09-29T10:00:00.000Z",
+    localTimestamp: "2026-09-29T06:00:00.000-04:00",
+    ...(timezone ? { localTimezone: timezone } : {}),
+    serviceUrl: connector.serviceUrl,
+    channelId: "msteams",
+    from: SENDER,
+    conversation: buildConversation(conversation),
+    recipient: BOT,
+    textFormat: "plain",
+    locale: "en-US",
+    text: isMention ? `<at>${BOT_NAME}</at> ${options.text}` : options.text,
+    entities: isMention
+      ? [
+          {
+            type: "mention",
+            text: `<at>${BOT_NAME}</at>`,
+            mentioned: BOT,
+          },
+          buildClientInfo(clientInfoTimezone),
+        ]
+      : [buildClientInfo(clientInfoTimezone)],
+    channelData: buildChannelData(conversation),
+  };
+}
+
+/*
+ * What Teams sends when the user presses a card's Action.Submit: a message
+ * with no text and no @mention (in a group chat too), replying to the card,
+ * whose value holds the inputs and the action's data.
+ */
+function buildCardSubmitActivity(options: {
+  id: string;
+  replyToId: string;
+  value: JSONObject;
+  conversation?: ConversationKind | undefined;
+  // Who pressed the button: the sender, unless someone else in the chat did.
+  from?: JSONObject | undefined;
+  localTimezone?: string | undefined;
+  localTimestamp?: string | undefined;
+}): JSONObject {
+  const conversation: ConversationKind = options.conversation || "personal";
+  const timezone: string | undefined = options.localTimezone;
+
+  return {
+    type: "message",
+    id: options.id,
+    replyToId: options.replyToId,
+    timestamp: "2026-09-29T10:05:00.000Z",
+    localTimestamp: options.localTimestamp || "2026-09-29T06:05:00.000-04:00",
+    ...(timezone ? { localTimezone: timezone } : {}),
+    serviceUrl: connector.serviceUrl,
+    channelId: "msteams",
+    from: options.from || SENDER,
+    conversation: buildConversation(conversation),
+    recipient: BOT,
+    locale: "en-US",
+    entities: [buildClientInfo(timezone)],
+    channelData: {
+      ...buildChannelData(conversation),
+      source: { name: "message" },
+      legacy: { replyToId: options.replyToId },
+    },
+    value: options.value,
+  };
+}
+
+// An Adaptive Card Universal Action (Action.Execute) arrives as an invoke.
+function buildInvokeActivity(id: string): JSONObject {
+  return {
+    type: "invoke",
+    name: "adaptiveCard/action",
+    id: id,
+    timestamp: "2026-09-29T10:10:00.000Z",
+    serviceUrl: connector.serviceUrl,
+    channelId: "msteams",
+    from: SENDER,
+    conversation: buildConversation("personal"),
+    recipient: BOT,
+    locale: "en-US",
+    value: {
+      action: {
+        type: "Action.Execute",
+        verb: MicrosoftTeamsIncidentActionType.AckIncident,
+        data: {
+          action: MicrosoftTeamsIncidentActionType.AckIncident,
+          actionValue: ObjectID.generate().toString(),
+        },
+      },
+      trigger: "manual",
+    },
+    channelData: { tenant: { id: TENANT_ID }, source: { name: "message" } },
+  };
+}
+
+type BotAddedActivityType = "conversationUpdate" | "installationUpdate";
+
+/*
+ * The bot added to a group chat, as Teams announces it: a conversationUpdate
+ * naming the bot among the members added, and an installationUpdate "add".
+ */
+function buildBotAddedActivity(
+  type: BotAddedActivityType,
+  id: string,
+): JSONObject {
+  return {
+    type: type,
+    id: id,
+    timestamp: "2026-09-29T10:15:00.000Z",
+    serviceUrl: connector.serviceUrl,
+    channelId: "msteams",
+    from: SENDER,
+    conversation: buildConversation("groupChat"),
+    recipient: BOT,
+    ...(type === "conversationUpdate"
+      ? { membersAdded: [BOT] }
+      : { action: "add" }),
+    channelData: { tenant: { id: TENANT_ID } },
+  };
+}
+
+// ---- Delivery, as Teams does it ----
+
+interface ConnectorCall {
+  method: string;
+  kind: "card" | "text" | "delete" | "other";
+  // A card's heading (first TextBlock), a text's text, a DELETE's target id.
+  label: string;
+  text: string | null;
+  card: JSONObject | null;
+  /*
+   * The card alone, measured here rather than by MicrosoftTeamsMessageSize,
+   * so a wrong measure in the code under test cannot pass its own check.
+   */
+  cardUtf16Bytes: number | null;
+  // The whole request body, as Teams measures it.
+  wireUtf16Bytes: number;
+  connectorStatus: number;
+  accepted: boolean;
+  conversationId: string | null;
+  activityIdInPath: string | null;
+  // The id the connector gave an accepted message; a card submit replies to it.
+  messageId: string | null;
+}
+
+interface DeliveryRecord {
+  // Null when the bot never answered the delivery.
+  httpStatus: number | null;
+  httpBody: unknown;
+  // Everything the bot asked the connector to do while handling it.
+  calls: Array<ConnectorCall>;
+}
+
+function asObject(value: unknown): JSONObject {
+  return value && typeof value === "object" && !Array.isArray(value)
+    ? (value as JSONObject)
+    : {};
+}
+
+function asObjectArray(value: unknown): Array<JSONObject> {
+  return Array.isArray(value) ? (value as Array<JSONObject>) : [];
+}
+
+function summarizeCall(record: ConnectorRequestRecord): ConnectorCall {
+  const activity: JSONObject = record.activity || {};
+  const firstAttachment: JSONObject | undefined = asObjectArray(
+    activity["attachments"],
+  )[0];
+  const card: JSONObject | null =
+    firstAttachment &&
+    firstAttachment["contentType"] === "application/vnd.microsoft.card.adaptive"
+      ? asObject(firstAttachment["content"])
+      : null;
+  const text: string | null =
+    typeof activity["text"] === "string" ? activity["text"] : null;
+  const accepted: boolean =
+    record.answeredStatus >= 200 && record.answeredStatus < 300;
+
+  let kind: ConnectorCall["kind"] = "other";
+  let label: string = `${record.method} ${record.path}`;
+
+  if (record.method === "DELETE") {
+    kind = "delete";
+    label = record.activityIdInPath || "";
+  } else if (card) {
+    kind = "card";
+    label = getTextBlocks(card)[0] || "";
+  } else if (text !== null) {
+    kind = "text";
+    label = text;
+  }
+
+  return {
+    method: record.method,
+    kind: kind,
+    label: label,
+    text: text,
+    card: card,
+    cardUtf16Bytes: card ? toUtf16Bytes(card) : null,
+    wireUtf16Bytes: record.wireUtf16Bytes,
+    connectorStatus: record.answeredStatus,
+    accepted: accepted,
+    conversationId: record.conversationId,
+    activityIdInPath: record.activityIdInPath,
+    messageId:
+      record.method === "POST" &&
+      accepted &&
+      typeof record.answeredBody["id"] === "string"
+        ? record.answeredBody["id"]
+        : null,
+  };
+}
+
+async function deliverOnce(activity: JSONObject): Promise<DeliveryRecord> {
+  const firstRequestIndex: number = connector.requests.length;
+
+  const req: ExpressRequest = {
+    method: "POST",
+    headers: {},
+    // Teams posts the JSON again for every delivery; the adapter mutates it.
+    body: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(activity)),
+  } as unknown as ExpressRequest;
+  const res: RecordingResponse = new RecordingResponse();
+
+  await MicrosoftTeamsUtil.processBotActivity(
+    req,
+    res as unknown as ExpressResponse,
+  );
+
+  return {
+    httpStatus: res.statusCode,
+    httpBody: res.body,
+    calls: connector.requests.slice(firstRequestIndex).map(summarizeCall),
+  };
+}
+
+// Teams tries a delivery again when the bot failed it or never answered it.
+function isFailedDelivery(delivery: DeliveryRecord): boolean {
+  return delivery.httpStatus === null || delivery.httpStatus >= 500;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Delivers an activity and, when the bot answers 5xx or not at all, delivers
+ * the SAME activity again (see the header). One redelivery is enough to show
+ * a doubled reply.
+ */
+async function deliverLikeTeams(
+  activity: JSONObject,
+  maxRedeliveries: number = 1,
+): Promise<Array<DeliveryRecord>> {
+  const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = [await deliverOnce(activity)];
+
+  while (
+    isFailedDelivery(deliveries[deliveries.length - 1]!) &&
+    deliveries.length <= maxRedeliveries
+  ) {
+    deliveries.push(await deliverOnce(activity));
+  }
+
+  return deliveries;
+}
+
+// What Teams and the user got, over every delivery of one activity.
+interface TeamsView {
+  /*
+   * The bot's HTTP answer to each delivery (null: none); more than one entry
+   * means Teams delivered the activity again.
+   */
+  httpStatuses: Array<number | null>;
+  // What the user sees, in order: every message the connector accepted.
+  bubbles: Array<ConnectorCall>;
+  // Messages the connector refused.
+  refused: Array<ConnectorCall>;
+  deletes: Array<ConnectorCall>;
+}
+
+function viewOf(deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord>): TeamsView {
+  const calls: Array<ConnectorCall> = [];
+  for (const delivery of deliveries) {
+    calls.push(...delivery.calls);
+  }
+
+  return {
+    httpStatuses: deliveries.map((delivery: DeliveryRecord) => {
+      return delivery.httpStatus;
+    }),
+    bubbles: calls.filter((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+      return call.method === "POST" && call.accepted;
+    }),
+    refused: calls.filter((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+      return call.method === "POST" && !call.accepted;
+    }),
+    deletes: calls.filter((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+      return call.method === "DELETE";
+    }),
+  };
+}
+
+function labelsOf(calls: Array<ConnectorCall>): Array<string> {
+  return calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+    return call.label;
+  });
+}
+
+function cardOf(call: ConnectorCall | undefined): JSONObject {
+  if (!call || !call.card) {
+    throw new Error(
+      `Expected an adaptive card, got ${call?.kind || "nothing"}`,
+    );
+  }
+  return call.card;
+}
+
+function textOf(call: ConnectorCall | undefined): string {
+  if (!call || call.text === null) {
+    throw new Error(`Expected a text message, got ${call?.kind || "nothing"}`);
+  }
+  return call.text;
+}
+
+// ---- Reading a card ----
+
+function getBodyElements(card: JSONObject): Array<JSONObject> {
+  return asObjectArray(card["body"]);
+}
+
+function getTextBlocks(card: JSONObject): Array<string> {
+  return getBodyElements(card)
+    .filter((element: JSONObject) => {
+      return element["type"] === "TextBlock";
+    })
+    .map((element: JSONObject) => {
+      return String(element["text"]);
+    });
+}
+
+function getElement(card: JSONObject, id: string): JSONObject | undefined {
+  return getBodyElements(card).find((element: JSONObject) => {
+    return element["id"] === id;
+  });
+}
+
+function getChoices(card: JSONObject, id: string): Array<JSONObject> {
+  return asObjectArray(getElement(card, id)?.["choices"]);
+}
+
+function getChoiceValues(card: JSONObject, id: string): Array<string> {
+  return getChoices(card, id).map((choice: JSONObject) => {
+    return String(choice["value"]);
+  });
+}
+
+function getActions(card: JSONObject): Array<JSONObject> {
+  return asObjectArray(card["actions"]);
+}
+
+function getSubmitData(card: JSONObject): JSONObject {
+  return asObject(
+    getActions(card).find((action: JSONObject) => {
+      return action["type"] === "Action.Submit";
+    })?.["data"],
+  );
+}
+
+function getCreateInOneUptimeActions(card: JSONObject): Array<JSONObject> {
+  return getActions(card).filter((action: JSONObject) => {
+    return action["type"] === "Action.OpenUrl";
+  });
+}
+
+function dashboardLink(route: string): string {
+  return `${DASHBOARD_URL}/${projectId.toString()}${route}`;
+}
+
+interface CardListExpectation {
+  choiceSetId: string;
+  pluralNoun: string;
+  addLaterHint: string;
+  // Every record the project has, in name order.
+  rows: Array<NamedRow>;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The card lists the first N records by name and, when N is short of all of
+ * them, says so under the list. Returns N.
+ */
+function expectListAccountedFor(
+  card: JSONObject,
+  list: CardListExpectation,
+): number {
+  const shownIds: Array<string> = getChoiceValues(card, list.choiceSetId);
+  const shownCount: number = shownIds.length;
+  const totalCount: number = list.rows.length;
+
+  expect(shownIds).toEqual(
+    list.rows.slice(0, shownCount).map((row: NamedRow) => {
+      return row._id;
+    }),
+  );
+
+  for (const choice of getChoices(card, list.choiceSetId)) {
+    expect(String(choice["title"]).length).toBeLessThanOrEqual(
+      MICROSOFT_TEAMS_MAX_CHOICE_TITLE_LENGTH,
+    );
+  }
+
+  let expectedNote: string | null = null;
+  if (shownCount < totalCount) {
+    expectedNote =
+      shownCount === 0
+        ? `This project has ${totalCount} ${list.pluralNoun}, too many to list in Microsoft Teams. ${list.addLaterHint}`
+        : `Showing the first ${shownCount} of ${totalCount} ${list.pluralNoun}, by name. ${list.addLaterHint}`;
+  }
+
+  expect(
+    getTextBlocks(card).filter((text: string) => {
+      return (
+        text.includes(` ${list.pluralNoun},`) &&
+        text.endsWith(list.addLaterHint)
+      );
+    }),
+  ).toEqual(expectedNote ? [expectedNote] : []);
+
+  return shownCount;
+}
+
+// ---- The operator log ----
+
+// One logger.error call, as the operator log got it.
+interface LoggedErrorCall {
+  message: unknown;
+  attributes: LogAttributes | undefined;
+}
+
+/*
+ * MicrosoftTeamsReplies.logFailure: a line that says what failed and why,
+ * then the error object itself with the same attributes, so the log keeps its
+ * stack and class. (A Bot Connector HTTP error gets the line alone.) Checks
+ * both calls, the line at `at` and the error right after it.
+ */
+function expectFailureLogged(data: {
+  at: number;
+  line: string;
+  error: unknown;
+  attributes: LogAttributes | undefined;
+}): void {
+  expect(loggedErrorCalls[data.at]).toStrictEqual({
+    message: data.line,
+    attributes: data.attributes,
+  });
+  expect(loggedErrorCalls[data.at + 1]?.message).toBe(data.error);
+  expect(loggedErrorCalls[data.at + 1]?.attributes).toStrictEqual(
+    data.attributes,
+  );
+}
+
+// OneUptime does not know its dashboard URL, so no reply can link into it.
+function withoutDashboardUrl(): void {
+  jest
+    .spyOn(DatabaseConfig, "getDashboardUrl")
+    .mockRejectedValue(new Error("simulated: no dashboard URL configured"));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Stops the clock the code under test reads - the test realm's Date - at
+ * `now`, and only that: timers stay real, so HTTP to the fake connector and
+ * the real botbuilder stack (which reads the outer realm's clock) run as
+ * ever. afterEach starts it again.
+ */
+function stopTheClockAt(now: Date): void {
+  jest.useFakeTimers({
+    now: now,
+    doNotFake: [
+      "hrtime",
+      "nextTick",
+      "performance",
+      "queueMicrotask",
+      "requestAnimationFrame",
+      "cancelAnimationFrame",
+      "requestIdleCallback",
+      "cancelIdleCallback",
+      "setImmediate",
+      "clearImmediate",
+      "setInterval",
+      "clearInterval",
+      "setTimeout",
+      "clearTimeout",
+    ],
+  });
+}
+
+// ---- Lifecycle ----
+
+let connector: FakeBotConnector;
+let realAdapter: RealAdapterUnderTest;
+let projectId: ObjectID;
+let loggedErrors: Array<string> = [];
+let loggedErrorCalls: Array<LoggedErrorCall> = [];
+let loggedWarnings: Array<string> = [];
+let outerConsoleErrorCalls: Array<Array<unknown>> = [];
+let originalOuterConsoleError: Console["error"];
+
+beforeAll(async () => {
+  connector = await startFakeBotConnector();
+});
+
+afterAll(async () => {
+  await connector.close();
+});
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  connector.requests.splice(0);
+  connector.maxUtf16Bytes = TEAMS_MESSAGE_LIMIT_IN_UTF16_BYTES;
+  connector.deleteStatus = 200;
+  connector.refuse = null;
+
+  realAdapter = installRealCloudAdapter();
+  projectId = ObjectID.generate();
+  stubTenantAndInstallCapture(projectId);
+  stubSenderCheck(projectId);
+  stubDashboardUrl();
+
+  loggedErrors = [];
+  loggedErrorCalls = [];
+  jest
+    .spyOn(logger, "error")
+    .mockImplementation(
+      (message: unknown, attributes?: LogAttributes | undefined): void => {
+        loggedErrors.push(String(message));
+        loggedErrorCalls.push({ message: message, attributes: attributes });
+      },
+    );
+  loggedWarnings = [];
+  jest.spyOn(logger, "warn").mockImplementation((message: unknown) => {
+    loggedWarnings.push(String(message));
+  });
+  // processBotActivity debug-logs whole activities.
+  jest.spyOn(logger, "debug").mockImplementation(() => {
+    return undefined;
+  });
+
+  outerConsoleErrorCalls = [];
+  originalOuterConsoleError = outerConsole.error;
+  outerConsole.error = (...args: Array<unknown>): void => {
+    outerConsoleErrorCalls.push(args);
+  };
+});
+
+afterEach(() => {
+  outerConsole.error = originalOuterConsoleError;
+  (MicrosoftTeamsUtil as unknown as CachedAdapterSlot).cachedAdapter = null;
+  jest.useRealTimers();
+  jest.restoreAllMocks();
+});
+
+// ---- Tests ----
+
+describe("harness: MicrosoftTeamsUtil runs on the real botbuilder stack", () => {
+  test("botbuilder is the real package, not the moduleNameMapper stub, and processBotActivity uses the injected adapter", () => {
+    expect(typeof CloudAdapter.prototype.process).toBe("function");
+    expect(typeof TeamsActivityHandler.prototype.run).toBe("function");
+    expect(typeof TeamsInfo.getPagedMembers).toBe("function");
+    expect(
+      (MicrosoftTeamsUtil as unknown as CachedAdapterSlot).cachedAdapter,
+    ).toBe(realAdapter.adapter);
+  });
+
+  test("the budgets this file checks against are the ones the code builds to: cards of 40 KiB, then 20 KiB, then no lists; texts of 40 KiB", () => {
+    expect(MICROSOFT_TEAMS_CARD_SIZE_BUDGETS_IN_BYTES).toEqual([
+      CARD_BUDGET_IN_UTF16_BYTES,
+      20 * 1024,
+      0,
+    ]);
+    expect(MICROSOFT_TEAMS_TEXT_MESSAGE_BUDGET_IN_BYTES).toBe(40 * 1024);
+  });
+
+  test("Teams' 413 reaches the bot as a RestError whose fields the production code reads", async () => {
+    stubProjectData({ monitors: 800 });
+    // Low enough that Teams refuses the first card.
+    connector.maxUtf16Bytes = 30 * 1024;
+
+    await deliverOnce(
+      buildMessageActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("rest-error-shape"),
+        text: "create incident",
+      }),
+    );
+
+    expect(realAdapter.sendActivitiesErrors).toHaveLength(1);
+    const error: unknown = realAdapter.sendActivitiesErrors[0];
+    const fields: {
+      name?: unknown;
+      message?: unknown;
+      statusCode?: unknown;
+      code?: unknown;
+      details?: unknown;
+      response?: { status?: unknown } | undefined;
+    } = error as {
+      name?: unknown;
+      message?: unknown;
+      statusCode?: unknown;
+      code?: unknown;
+      details?: unknown;
+      response?: { status?: unknown } | undefined;
+    };
+
+    expect(fields.name).toBe("RestError");
+    expect(fields.message).toBe("Message size too large.");
+    expect(fields.statusCode).toBe(413);
+    expect(fields.code).toBe("MessageSizeTooBig");
+    // @azure/core-client puts the parsed error body on details.
+    expect(fields.details).toEqual(MESSAGE_SIZE_TOO_BIG_BODY);
+    expect(fields.response?.status).toBe(413);
+
+    // A native Error of Node's realm: instanceof this realm's Error is false.
+    expect(util.types.isNativeError(error)).toBe(true);
+    expect(error instanceof Error).toBe(false);
+
+    // What the production code reads off it.
+    expect(MicrosoftTeamsMessageSize.isMessageTooLargeError(error)).toBe(true);
+    expect(MicrosoftTeamsMessageSize.getErrorStatusCode(error)).toBe(413);
+    expect(MicrosoftTeamsMessageSize.getErrorCode(error)).toBe(
+      "MessageSizeTooBig",
+    );
+    expect(MicrosoftTeamsReplies.describeError(error)).toBe(
+      "RestError 413 MessageSizeTooBig: Message size too large.",
+    );
+  });
+});
+
+describe("'create incident' (#4111): one form Teams accepts, one answer, HTTP 200", () => {
+  test("800 monitors: one 'Create New Incident' card within 40 KiB that names what it left off, HTTP 200, no redelivery", async () => {
+    const project: ProjectData = stubProjectData({ monitors: 800 });
+    const activityId: string = nextActivityId("create-incident-800");
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildMessageActivity({ id: activityId, text: "create incident" }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    // master: [500, 500] and two "Sorry" bubbles.
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(view.refused).toEqual([]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual(["Create New Incident"]);
+
+    const form: ConnectorCall = view.bubbles[0]!;
+    expect(form.kind).toBe("card");
+    // Threaded under the user's message.
+    expect(form.conversationId).toBe(PERSONAL_CONVERSATION_ID);
+    expect(form.activityIdInPath).toBe(activityId);
+    // The whole message, envelope included, is within 40 KiB.
+    expect(form.wireUtf16Bytes).toBeLessThanOrEqual(40 * 1024);
+    expect(form.cardUtf16Bytes).toBeLessThanOrEqual(CARD_BUDGET_IN_UTF16_BYTES);
+
+    const card: JSONObject = cardOf(form);
+    const shownMonitors: number = expectListAccountedFor(card, {
+      choiceSetId: "incidentMonitors",
+      pluralNoun: "monitors",
+      addLaterHint: INCIDENT_ADD_LATER_HINT,
+      rows: project.monitors,
+    });
+    expect(shownMonitors).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+    expect(shownMonitors).toBeLessThan(800);
+    expect(shownMonitors).toBeLessThanOrEqual(
+      MICROSOFT_TEAMS_MAX_MONITOR_CHOICES,
+    );
+    expect(getTextBlocks(card)).toContain(
+      `Showing the first ${shownMonitors} of 800 monitors, by name. ${INCIDENT_ADD_LATER_HINT}`,
+    );
+
+    // The shorter lists fit whole, so they carry no note.
+    expectListAccountedFor(card, {
+      choiceSetId: "labels",
+      pluralNoun: "labels",
+      addLaterHint: INCIDENT_ADD_LATER_HINT,
+      rows: project.labels,
+    });
+    expect(getChoiceValues(card, "labels")).toHaveLength(20);
+    expectListAccountedFor(card, {
+      choiceSetId: "onCallDutyPolicies",
+      pluralNoun: "on-call policies",
+      addLaterHint: INCIDENT_ADD_LATER_HINT,
+      rows: project.onCallPolicies,
+    });
+    expect(getChoiceValues(card, "onCallDutyPolicies")).toHaveLength(10);
+    // Severity is required, so it is always listed whole.
+    expect(getChoiceValues(card, "incidentSeverity")).toHaveLength(4);
+
+    expect(getSubmitData(card)).toEqual({
+      action: MicrosoftTeamsIncidentActionType.SubmitNewIncident,
+    });
+    expect(getCreateInOneUptimeActions(card)).toEqual([
+      {
+        type: "Action.OpenUrl",
+        title: "Create in OneUptime",
+        url: dashboardLink("/incidents/create"),
+      },
+    ]);
+
+    // Nothing failed on the way, and nothing reached the adapter's 500 path.
+    expect(realAdapter.sendActivitiesErrors).toEqual([]);
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("the same activity delivered twice (Teams redelivers after a slow 200): the repeat posts nothing and is answered 200", async () => {
+    stubProjectData({ monitors: 800 });
+    const activity: JSONObject = buildMessageActivity({
+      id: nextActivityId("redelivered"),
+      text: "create incident",
+    });
+
+    const first: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(activity);
+    const repeat: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(activity);
+
+    expect(first.httpStatus).toBe(200);
+    expect(labelsOf(first.calls)).toEqual(["Create New Incident"]);
+    expect(repeat.httpStatus).toBe(200);
+    expect(repeat.calls).toEqual([]);
+    // Dropped before any work: the project's monitors were read once.
+    expect(MonitorService.findBy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+    // A new message in the same chat is still answered.
+    const next: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(
+      buildMessageActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("after-redelivery"),
+        text: "create incident",
+      }),
+    );
+    expect(next.httpStatus).toBe(200);
+    expect(labelsOf(next.calls)).toEqual(["Create New Incident"]);
+  });
+
+  test("Teams redelivers while the first delivery is still being handled (its retry of a slow turn): the redelivery is answered 200 at once and posts nothing, and the user gets one card", async () => {
+    const project: ProjectData = stubProjectData({ monitors: 800 });
+    const activity: JSONObject = buildMessageActivity({
+      id: nextActivityId("slow-first-delivery"),
+      text: "create incident",
+    });
+
+    /*
+     * The first read of the monitors waits until the redelivery has been
+     * answered, as a slow database would. Later reads go straight through, so
+     * a redelivery that is not dropped posts a card of its own rather than
+     * waiting here for ever.
+     */
+    let isFirstReadStarted: boolean = false;
+    let signalFirstReadStarted: () => void = (): void => {
+      return undefined;
+    };
+    const firstReadStarted: Promise<void> = new Promise<void>(
+      (resolve: () => void) => {
+        signalFirstReadStarted = resolve;
+      },
+    );
+    let releaseFirstRead: () => void = (): void => {
+      return undefined;
+    };
+    const firstReadReleased: Promise<void> = new Promise<void>(
+      (resolve: () => void) => {
+        releaseFirstRead = resolve;
+      },
+    );
+    jest
+      .spyOn(MonitorService, "findBy")
+      .mockImplementation(async (findBy: unknown): Promise<Array<Monitor>> => {
+        if (!isFirstReadStarted) {
+          isFirstReadStarted = true;
+          signalFirstReadStarted();
+          await firstReadReleased;
+        }
+        return firstRowsFor(
+          project.monitors,
+          findBy,
+        ) as unknown as Array<Monitor>;
+      });
+
+    const firstDelivery: Promise<DeliveryRecord> = deliverOnce(activity);
+    // Fails at once, instead of hanging, if the first delivery never reads the list.
+    const failUnlessFirstReadStarted: (error?: unknown) => void = (
+      error?: unknown,
+    ): void => {
+      if (!isFirstReadStarted) {
+        throw error || new Error("The first delivery never read the monitors");
+      }
+    };
+    await Promise.race([
+      firstReadStarted,
+      firstDelivery.then(
+        (): void => {
+          return failUnlessFirstReadStarted();
+        },
+        (error: unknown): void => {
+          return failUnlessFirstReadStarted(error);
+        },
+      ),
+    ]);
+
+    const redelivery: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(activity);
+    releaseFirstRead();
+    const first: DeliveryRecord = await firstDelivery;
+
+    // Dropped on arrival: answered while the first delivery was held up.
+    expect(redelivery.httpStatus).toBe(200);
+    expect(redelivery.calls).toEqual([]);
+    /*
+     * The first delivery's window spans the redelivery's, so it would show a
+     * card the redelivery posted too; it shows exactly one.
+     */
+    expect(first.httpStatus).toBe(200);
+    expect(labelsOf(first.calls)).toEqual(["Create New Incident"]);
+    expect(MonitorService.findBy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("the same activity id in another chat is another message (Teams numbers messages per chat): both are answered", async () => {
+    stubProjectData({ monitors: 5 });
+    const activityId: string = nextActivityId("same-id-two-chats");
+
+    const inPersonalChat: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(
+      buildMessageActivity({ id: activityId, text: "create incident" }),
+    );
+    const inGroupChat: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(
+      buildMessageActivity({
+        id: activityId,
+        text: "create incident",
+        conversation: "groupChat",
+      }),
+    );
+
+    expect([inPersonalChat.httpStatus, inGroupChat.httpStatus]).toEqual([
+      200, 200,
+    ]);
+    expect(
+      [...inPersonalChat.calls, ...inGroupChat.calls].map(
+        (call: ConnectorCall) => {
+          return [call.conversationId, call.label];
+        },
+      ),
+    ).toEqual([
+      [PERSONAL_CONVERSATION_ID, "Create New Incident"],
+      [GROUP_CONVERSATION_ID, "Create New Incident"],
+    ]);
+  });
+
+  test("Teams refuses the 40 KiB card (limit lowered to 30 KiB): the connector sees 413 then a smaller card it accepts, and the user sees one card", async () => {
+    const project: ProjectData = stubProjectData({ monitors: 800 });
+    connector.maxUtf16Bytes = 30 * 1024;
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildMessageActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("create-incident-30k"),
+        text: "create incident",
+      }),
+    );
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(deliveries);
+    const calls: Array<ConnectorCall> = deliveries[0]!.calls;
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(
+      calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.kind, call.label, call.connectorStatus];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      ["card", "Create New Incident", 413],
+      ["card", "Create New Incident", 200],
+    ]);
+
+    const refused: ConnectorCall = calls[0]!;
+    const accepted: ConnectorCall = calls[1]!;
+    expect(refused.wireUtf16Bytes).toBeGreaterThan(30 * 1024);
+    expect(refused.cardUtf16Bytes).toBeLessThanOrEqual(
+      CARD_BUDGET_IN_UTF16_BYTES,
+    );
+    expect(accepted.wireUtf16Bytes).toBeLessThanOrEqual(30 * 1024);
+    // Built for the second budget, 20 KiB.
+    expect(accepted.cardUtf16Bytes).toBeLessThanOrEqual(20 * 1024);
+    expect(view.bubbles).toEqual([accepted]);
+
+    // The smaller card lists fewer monitors, and still says what it left off.
+    const shownInRefused: number = getChoiceValues(
+      cardOf(refused),
+      "incidentMonitors",
+    ).length;
+    const shownInAccepted: number = expectListAccountedFor(cardOf(accepted), {
+      choiceSetId: "incidentMonitors",
+      pluralNoun: "monitors",
+      addLaterHint: INCIDENT_ADD_LATER_HINT,
+      rows: project.monitors,
+    });
+    expect(shownInAccepted).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+    expect(shownInAccepted).toBeLessThan(shownInRefused);
+    expect(getCreateInOneUptimeActions(cardOf(accepted))).toEqual([
+      {
+        type: "Action.OpenUrl",
+        title: "Create in OneUptime",
+        url: dashboardLink("/incidents/create"),
+      },
+    ]);
+
+    // The refusal is a warning for the operator, not an error for the user.
+    expect(loggedWarnings).toEqual([
+      `Microsoft Teams refused a ${refused.cardUtf16Bytes} byte card as too large (budget ${CARD_BUDGET_IN_UTF16_BYTES} bytes); trying a smaller one.`,
+    ]);
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("Teams refuses every card (limit 2 KiB): one text says the form was refused as too large and links to creating it in OneUptime, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    stubProjectData({ monitors: 800 });
+    connector.maxUtf16Bytes = 2 * 1024;
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildMessageActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("create-incident-2k"),
+        text: "create incident",
+      }),
+    );
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(deliveries);
+    const calls: Array<ConnectorCall> = deliveries[0]!.calls;
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    // One card per budget (40 KiB, 20 KiB, no lists), then the explanation.
+    expect(
+      calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.kind, call.connectorStatus];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      ["card", 413],
+      ["card", 413],
+      ["card", 413],
+      ["text", 200],
+    ]);
+
+    const withoutLists: JSONObject = cardOf(calls[2]);
+    expect(getElement(withoutLists, "incidentMonitors")).toBeUndefined();
+    expect(getElement(withoutLists, "labels")).toBeUndefined();
+    expect(getElement(withoutLists, "onCallDutyPolicies")).toBeUndefined();
+
+    expect(view.bubbles).toHaveLength(1);
+    const reply: string = textOf(view.bubbles[0]);
+    expect(reply).toMatch(
+      /^Sorry, I couldn't open the form to create an incident: Microsoft Teams refused it as too large/,
+    );
+    expect(reply).toContain(dashboardLink("/incidents/create"));
+
+    /*
+     * A Bot Connector HTTP error is logged as the one line: its status and
+     * code say it all, and the object carries the whole request and response.
+     */
+    expect(loggedErrorCalls).toStrictEqual([
+      {
+        message:
+          "Microsoft Teams did not accept the form to create an incident: RestError 413 MessageSizeTooBig: Message size too large.",
+        attributes: { projectId: projectId.toString() },
+      },
+    ]);
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("Teams refuses the explanation too (limit 512 bytes): still one delivery answered HTTP 200, and the operator log says why the user saw nothing", async () => {
+    stubProjectData({ monitors: 800 });
+    connector.maxUtf16Bytes = 512;
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildMessageActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("create-incident-512"),
+        text: "create incident",
+      }),
+    );
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(deliveries);
+
+    /*
+     * master: the handler's catch replied "Sorry..." and rethrew; whether or
+     * not that reply got through, the adapter answered 500 and Teams
+     * delivered the message again.
+     */
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(
+      deliveries[0]!.calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.kind, call.connectorStatus];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      ["card", 413],
+      ["card", 413],
+      ["card", 413],
+      ["text", 413],
+    ]);
+    expect(view.bubbles).toEqual([]);
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      "Microsoft Teams did not accept the form to create an incident: RestError 413 MessageSizeTooBig: Message size too large.",
+      "Could not send a Microsoft Teams reply: RestError 413 MessageSizeTooBig: Message size too large.",
+    ]);
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("Teams refuses the form for a reason other than its size (400 BadArgument): no smaller card is tried, and one text names Teams' status and code and links to creating it in OneUptime, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    stubProjectData({ monitors: 800 });
+    connector.refuse = (request: ConnectorRequest): ConnectorAnswer | null => {
+      return isCardPost(request) ? CARD_REFUSED_ANSWER : null;
+    };
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildMessageActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("create-incident-400"),
+        text: "create incident",
+      }),
+    );
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(deliveries);
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    // Only a refusal for size is worth a smaller card; this one is final.
+    expect(
+      deliveries[0]!.calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.kind, call.connectorStatus];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      ["card", 400],
+      ["text", 200],
+    ]);
+    // The real RestError's status and code, in the user's words.
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+      `Sorry, I couldn't open the form to create an incident: Microsoft Teams did not accept it (400 BadArgument). You can create it in OneUptime instead: ${dashboardLink("/incidents/create")}`,
+    ]);
+    expect(loggedWarnings).toEqual([]);
+    // One line, as for any Bot Connector HTTP error.
+    expect(loggedErrorCalls).toStrictEqual([
+      {
+        message:
+          "Microsoft Teams did not accept the form to create an incident: RestError 400 BadArgument: The card was refused.",
+        attributes: { projectId: projectId.toString() },
+      },
+    ]);
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  // A type, not an interface: test.each wants a Record<string, unknown> row.
+  type ListsUnreadableCase = {
+    command: string;
+    what: string;
+    createRoute: string;
+    // Whether OneUptime knows its dashboard URL, to link to the create page.
+    hasDashboardUrl: boolean;
+  };
+
+  test.each<ListsUnreadableCase>([
+    {
+      command: "create incident",
+      what: "an incident",
+      createRoute: "/incidents/create",
+      hasDashboardUrl: true,
+    },
+    {
+      command: "create maintenance",
+      what: "a scheduled maintenance event",
+      createRoute: "/scheduled-maintenance-events/create",
+      hasDashboardUrl: true,
+    },
+    {
+      command: "create incident",
+      what: "an incident",
+      createRoute: "/incidents/create",
+      hasDashboardUrl: false,
+    },
+  ])(
+    "'$command' when the project's monitors cannot be read (dashboard URL known: $hasDashboardUrl): one text that says so and where else to create it, HTTP 200, no redelivery",
+    async (unreadable: ListsUnreadableCase) => {
+      stubProjectData({ monitors: 5 });
+      const databaseFailure: Error = new Error("simulated database failure");
+      jest.spyOn(MonitorService, "findBy").mockRejectedValue(databaseFailure);
+      if (!unreadable.hasDashboardUrl) {
+        withoutDashboardUrl();
+      }
+
+      const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+        await deliverLikeTeams(
+          buildMessageActivity({
+            id: nextActivityId("lists-unreadable"),
+            text: unreadable.command,
+          }),
+        ),
+      );
+
+      // master: [500, 500] and two "Sorry" bubbles.
+      expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+      expect(view.refused).toEqual([]);
+      expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+        `Sorry, I couldn't open the form to create ${unreadable.what} because OneUptime could not load the lists it needs just now. Please try again in a minute, or create it in OneUptime instead${
+          unreadable.hasDashboardUrl
+            ? `: ${dashboardLink(unreadable.createRoute)}`
+            : "."
+        }`,
+      ]);
+      // What failed, then the error itself.
+      expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+        `Could not load the Microsoft Teams form to create ${unreadable.what}: Error: simulated database failure`,
+        "Error: simulated database failure",
+      ]);
+      expectFailureLogged({
+        at: 0,
+        line: loggedErrors[0]!,
+        error: databaseFailure,
+        attributes: { projectId: projectId.toString() },
+      });
+      expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+    },
+  );
+
+  // A type, not an interface: test.each wants a Record<string, unknown> row.
+  type NoSeveritiesCase = {
+    hasDashboardUrl: boolean;
+  };
+
+  test.each<NoSeveritiesCase>([
+    { hasDashboardUrl: true },
+    { hasDashboardUrl: false },
+  ])(
+    "a project without incident severities (dashboard URL known: $hasDashboardUrl): one text that says where to add one, no form",
+    async (noSeverities: NoSeveritiesCase) => {
+      stubProjectData({ monitors: 5, severities: 0 });
+      if (!noSeverities.hasDashboardUrl) {
+        withoutDashboardUrl();
+      }
+
+      const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+        await deliverLikeTeams(
+          buildMessageActivity({
+            id: nextActivityId("no-severities"),
+            text: "create incident",
+          }),
+        ),
+      );
+
+      expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+      expect(view.refused).toEqual([]);
+      /*
+       * Where the dashboard has the page, linked when it can be:
+       * /dashboard/<project>/incidents/settings/severity.
+       */
+      expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+        `An incident needs a severity, and this project has no incident severities yet. Add one in OneUptime under ${
+          noSeverities.hasDashboardUrl
+            ? `[Incidents → Settings → Incident Severity](${dashboardLink("/incidents/settings/severity")})`
+            : "Incidents → Settings → Incident Severity"
+        }, then try again.`,
+      ]);
+      expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+    },
+  );
+
+  // A type, not an interface: test.each wants a Record<string, unknown> row.
+  type NotLinkedCase = {
+    command: string;
+    // How the reply starts: why the sender needs a connected account.
+    purpose: string;
+  };
+
+  test.each<NotLinkedCase>([
+    {
+      command: "create incident",
+      purpose: "To create incidents from Microsoft Teams",
+    },
+    {
+      command: "create maintenance",
+      purpose: "To schedule maintenance from Microsoft Teams",
+    },
+  ])(
+    "'$command' from a Teams user with no connected account: one reply pointing at User Settings → Microsoft Teams, no form",
+    async (notLinked: NotLinkedCase) => {
+      stubProjectData({ monitors: 800 });
+      /*
+       * The real account lookup runs, and finds no link: only the table under
+       * it is stubbed, so it is Auth.ts that says the account is not linked.
+       */
+      jest
+        .spyOn(MicrosoftTeamsAuthAction, "getOneUptimeUserIdFromTeamsUserId")
+        .mockRestore();
+      jest
+        .spyOn(WorkspaceUserAuthTokenService, "findOneBy")
+        .mockResolvedValue(null);
+
+      const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+        await deliverLikeTeams(
+          buildMessageActivity({
+            id: nextActivityId("not-linked"),
+            text: notLinked.command,
+          }),
+        ),
+      );
+
+      expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+      expect(view.refused).toEqual([]);
+      expect(view.bubbles).toHaveLength(1);
+      const reply: string = textOf(view.bubbles[0]);
+      expect(reply.startsWith(notLinked.purpose)).toBe(true);
+      expect(reply).toContain("User Settings → Microsoft Teams");
+      expect(reply).toContain(
+        dashboardLink("/user-settings/microsoft-teams-integration"),
+      );
+      // The link looked for was this sender's, in this project.
+      expect(WorkspaceUserAuthTokenService.findOneBy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      expect(WorkspaceUserAuthTokenService.findOneBy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+        expect.objectContaining({
+          query: expect.objectContaining({
+            workspaceUserId: SENDER_AAD_OBJECT_ID,
+            projectId: projectId,
+          }),
+        }),
+      );
+      // Told before filling the form in: the lists were never read.
+      expect(MonitorService.findBy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      // Expected, not a server error.
+      expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+    },
+  );
+});
+
+describe("'create maintenance' (#4111)", () => {
+  test("in a group chat (@mention), 800 monitors: one card for everyone there, that names the sender's time zone and carries it in its submit data", async () => {
+    const project: ProjectData = stubProjectData({ monitors: 800 });
+    const activityId: string = nextActivityId("create-maintenance-group");
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildMessageActivity({
+          id: activityId,
+          text: "create maintenance Database Upgrade Window",
+          conversation: "groupChat",
+          localTimezone: SENDER_TIMEZONE,
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    // master: [500, 500] and two "Sorry" bubbles.
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(view.refused).toEqual([]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+      "Create New Scheduled Maintenance",
+    ]);
+
+    const form: ConnectorCall = view.bubbles[0]!;
+    expect(form.conversationId).toBe(GROUP_CONVERSATION_ID);
+    expect(form.activityIdInPath).toBe(activityId);
+    expect(form.wireUtf16Bytes).toBeLessThanOrEqual(40 * 1024);
+    expect(form.cardUtf16Bytes).toBeLessThanOrEqual(CARD_BUDGET_IN_UTF16_BYTES);
+
+    const card: JSONObject = cardOf(form);
+    /*
+     * The zone the start and end are typed in, named and sent back on submit.
+     * Not "your time zone": whoever fills the form in may be somewhere else.
+     */
+    expect(getTextBlocks(card)).toContain(
+      `Start and end times are in ${SENDER_TIMEZONE}.`,
+    );
+    expect(getSubmitData(card)).toEqual({
+      action:
+        MicrosoftTeamsScheduledMaintenanceActionType.SubmitNewScheduledMaintenance,
+      timezone: SENDER_TIMEZONE,
+    });
+    // The words after the command, as typed (the @mention stripped).
+    expect(getElement(card, "scheduledMaintenanceTitle")?.["value"]).toBe(
+      "Database Upgrade Window",
+    );
+
+    const shownMonitors: number = expectListAccountedFor(card, {
+      choiceSetId: "scheduledMaintenanceMonitors",
+      pluralNoun: "monitors",
+      addLaterHint: MAINTENANCE_ADD_LATER_HINT,
+      rows: project.monitors,
+    });
+    expect(shownMonitors).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+    expect(shownMonitors).toBeLessThan(800);
+    expect(getCreateInOneUptimeActions(card)).toEqual([
+      {
+        type: "Action.OpenUrl",
+        title: "Create in OneUptime",
+        url: dashboardLink("/scheduled-maintenance-events/create"),
+      },
+    ]);
+
+    /*
+     * Anyone in the chat may submit it, and the submit checks whoever does,
+     * so the one who asked is not checked first.
+     */
+    expect(
+      MicrosoftTeamsAuthAction.getOneUptimeUserIdFromTeamsUserId,
+    ).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(
+      WorkspaceActionAuthorization.getProjectMemberProps,
+    ).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(WorkspaceActionAuthorization.assertCanCreate).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  // A type, not an interface: test.each wants a Record<string, unknown> row.
+  type ZoneSourceCase = {
+    description: string;
+    localTimezone: string | undefined;
+    clientInfoTimezone: string | undefined;
+    // The zone the card names and carries in its submit data; null for none.
+    expectedTimezone: string | null;
+  };
+
+  /*
+   * Each place Teams names the sender's zone, as the real adapter hands the
+   * activity over: a field it dropped would leave the form without a zone.
+   */
+  test.each<ZoneSourceCase>([
+    {
+      description:
+        "the activity's localTimezone, over a different clientInfo zone",
+      localTimezone: SENDER_TIMEZONE,
+      clientInfoTimezone: "Europe/Berlin",
+      expectedTimezone: SENDER_TIMEZONE,
+    },
+    {
+      description: "the clientInfo entity's zone, when the activity names none",
+      localTimezone: undefined,
+      clientInfoTimezone: "Asia/Kolkata",
+      expectedTimezone: "Asia/Kolkata",
+    },
+    {
+      description:
+        "no zone anywhere (iOS has been seen to send none): the card says so and carries none",
+      localTimezone: undefined,
+      clientInfoTimezone: undefined,
+      expectedTimezone: null,
+    },
+  ])(
+    "the zone on the form comes from $description",
+    async (zoneCase: ZoneSourceCase) => {
+      stubProjectData({ monitors: 5 });
+
+      const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+        await deliverLikeTeams(
+          buildMessageActivity({
+            id: nextActivityId("maintenance-zone"),
+            text: "create maintenance",
+            localTimezone: zoneCase.localTimezone,
+            clientInfoTimezone: zoneCase.clientInfoTimezone,
+          }),
+        ),
+      );
+
+      expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+      expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+        "Create New Scheduled Maintenance",
+      ]);
+      const card: JSONObject = cardOf(view.bubbles[0]);
+      expect(getTextBlocks(card)).toContain(
+        zoneCase.expectedTimezone
+          ? `Start and end times are in ${zoneCase.expectedTimezone}.`
+          : "Start and end times are in the time zone Microsoft Teams reports for you, or in UTC if it does not report one.",
+      );
+      expect(getSubmitData(card)).toEqual({
+        action:
+          MicrosoftTeamsScheduledMaintenanceActionType.SubmitNewScheduledMaintenance,
+        ...(zoneCase.expectedTimezone
+          ? { timezone: zoneCase.expectedTimezone }
+          : {}),
+      });
+    },
+  );
+});
+
+describe("who is checked before the form (#4111 review): the sender of a personal chat; in a channel or group chat nobody, as the submit checks whoever submits", () => {
+  // A type, not an interface: test.each wants a Record<string, unknown> row.
+  type SharedChatCase = {
+    command: string;
+    heading: string;
+    conversation: ConversationKind;
+    conversationId: string;
+  };
+
+  test.each<SharedChatCase>([
+    {
+      command: "create incident",
+      heading: "Create New Incident",
+      conversation: "groupChat",
+      conversationId: GROUP_CONVERSATION_ID,
+    },
+    {
+      command: "create incident",
+      heading: "Create New Incident",
+      conversation: "channel",
+      conversationId: CHANNEL_CONVERSATION_ID,
+    },
+    {
+      command: "create maintenance",
+      heading: "Create New Scheduled Maintenance",
+      conversation: "groupChat",
+      conversationId: GROUP_CONVERSATION_ID,
+    },
+    {
+      command: "create maintenance",
+      heading: "Create New Scheduled Maintenance",
+      conversation: "channel",
+      conversationId: CHANNEL_CONVERSATION_ID,
+    },
+  ])(
+    "'$command' in a $conversation, from a sender every check would refuse: the form is posted for everyone there, and nobody is looked up",
+    async (sharedChat: SharedChatCase) => {
+      stubProjectData({ monitors: 5 });
+      // Each check would refuse this sender, were it asked.
+      jest
+        .spyOn(MicrosoftTeamsAuthAction, "getOneUptimeUserIdFromTeamsUserId")
+        .mockRejectedValue(
+          new MicrosoftTeamsAccountNotLinkedException(
+            "No OneUptime user linked to this Microsoft Teams user. Please authenticate with Microsoft Teams.",
+          ),
+        );
+      jest
+        .spyOn(WorkspaceActionAuthorization, "getProjectMemberProps")
+        .mockRejectedValue(
+          new NotAuthorizedException(
+            WorkspaceActionAuthorization.NOT_A_PROJECT_MEMBER_MESSAGE,
+          ),
+        );
+      jest
+        .spyOn(WorkspaceActionAuthorization, "assertCanCreate")
+        .mockRejectedValue(
+          new NotAuthorizedException(
+            "You do not have permission to create a scheduled maintenance event.",
+          ),
+        );
+      const activityId: string = nextActivityId("shared-chat-form");
+
+      const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+        await deliverLikeTeams(
+          buildMessageActivity({
+            id: activityId,
+            text: sharedChat.command,
+            conversation: sharedChat.conversation,
+          }),
+        ),
+      );
+
+      expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+      expect(view.refused).toEqual([]);
+      expect(
+        view.bubbles.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+          return [call.kind, call.label, call.conversationId];
+        }),
+      ).toEqual([["card", sharedChat.heading, sharedChat.conversationId]]);
+      expect(view.bubbles[0]!.activityIdInPath).toBe(activityId);
+      expect(
+        MicrosoftTeamsAuthAction.getOneUptimeUserIdFromTeamsUserId,
+      ).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(
+        WorkspaceActionAuthorization.getProjectMemberProps,
+      ).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(
+        WorkspaceActionAuthorization.assertCanCreate,
+      ).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+    },
+  );
+
+  // A type, not an interface: test.each wants a Record<string, unknown> row.
+  type PersonalChatCommandCase = {
+    command: string;
+  };
+
+  test.each<PersonalChatCommandCase>([
+    { command: "create incident" },
+    { command: "create maintenance" },
+  ])(
+    "'$command' in a personal chat from a Teams user who is no longer a member of the project: told so by the real membership check, once, before the form; the lists are never read",
+    async (personal: PersonalChatCommandCase) => {
+      stubProjectData({ monitors: 800 });
+      useRealMembershipCheck(null);
+
+      const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+        await deliverLikeTeams(
+          buildMessageActivity({
+            id: nextActivityId("personal-not-member"),
+            text: personal.command,
+          }),
+        ),
+      );
+
+      expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+      expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+        "Your OneUptime account is not a member of this project. Ask a project admin to invite you, then try again.",
+      ]);
+      // The one checked is the sender, in this project, from the database.
+      expect(TeamMemberService.findBy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      expect(TeamMemberService.findBy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+        expect.objectContaining({
+          query: {
+            userId: ONEUPTIME_USER_ID,
+            projectId: projectId,
+            hasAcceptedInvitation: true,
+          },
+        }),
+      );
+      expect(MonitorService.findBy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      // A refusal, not a server error.
+      expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+    },
+  );
+
+  test("'create maintenance' in a personal chat from a member who may not create scheduled maintenance (a read-only Viewer): told why by the real permission check, once, before the form", async () => {
+    stubProjectData({ monitors: 5 });
+    useRealMembershipCheck([Permission.Viewer]);
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildMessageActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("personal-no-permission"),
+          text: "create maintenance",
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    // The same refusal a submit would get (see the maintenance submit tests).
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+      "You do not have permission to create a scheduled maintenance event. You do not have permissions to create Scheduled Maintenance Event. You need one of these permissions: Project Owner, Project Admin, Project Member, Scheduled Maintenance Admin, Scheduled Maintenance Member, Create Scheduled Maintenance",
+    ]);
+    expect(WorkspaceActionAuthorization.assertCanCreate).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(
+      1,
+    );
+    expect(WorkspaceActionAuthorization.assertCanCreate).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      expect.objectContaining({
+        modelType: ScheduledMaintenance,
+        action: "create a scheduled maintenance event",
+      }),
+    );
+    expect(MonitorService.findBy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("'create incident' in a personal chat asks for membership only (deliberate, see the incident submit tests): a read-only Viewer gets the form", async () => {
+    stubProjectData({ monitors: 5 });
+    useRealMembershipCheck([Permission.Viewer]);
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildMessageActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("personal-incident-membership-only"),
+          text: "create incident",
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual(["Create New Incident"]);
+    expect(TeamMemberService.findBy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    expect(WorkspaceActionAuthorization.assertCanCreate).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("the sender of a personal chat cannot be checked (the membership read fails): one reply says to try again, the log says why, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    stubProjectData({ monitors: 5 });
+    const membershipFailure: Error = new Error(
+      "simulated membership read failure",
+    );
+    jest
+      .spyOn(WorkspaceActionAuthorization, "getProjectMemberProps")
+      .mockRejectedValue(membershipFailure);
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildMessageActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("personal-check-fails"),
+          text: "create incident",
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+      "Sorry, I couldn't open the form to create an incident because OneUptime could not check your account just now. Please try again in a minute.",
+    ]);
+    expect(MonitorService.findBy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      "Could not check the Microsoft Teams sender of a create command: Error: simulated membership read failure",
+      "Error: simulated membership read failure",
+    ]);
+    expectFailureLogged({
+      at: 0,
+      line: loggedErrors[0]!,
+      error: membershipFailure,
+      attributes: { projectId: projectId.toString() },
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+describe("a title or a name past the form's limits (#4111 review): cut before an emoji, never through it", () => {
+  // A type, not an interface: test.each wants a Record<string, unknown> row.
+  type TitleCutCase = {
+    command: string;
+    titleInputId: string;
+    monitorsChoiceSetId: string;
+    // The title column's length, and the title input's maxLength.
+    titleMaxLength: number;
+  };
+
+  test.each<TitleCutCase>([
+    {
+      command: "create incident",
+      titleInputId: "incidentTitle",
+      monitorsChoiceSetId: "incidentMonitors",
+      titleMaxLength: 500,
+    },
+    {
+      command: "create maintenance",
+      titleInputId: "scheduledMaintenanceTitle",
+      monitorsChoiceSetId: "scheduledMaintenanceMonitors",
+      titleMaxLength: 100,
+    },
+  ])(
+    "'$command <title>' with an emoji across the $titleMaxLength-character cut, and a monitor named with one across the choice cut: both end before the emoji",
+    async (cut: TitleCutCase) => {
+      const project: ProjectData = stubProjectData({ monitors: 3 });
+      /*
+       * A choice title over MICROSOFT_TEAMS_MAX_CHOICE_TITLE_LENGTH keeps one
+       * place less than that for its text, then "…"; the emoji straddles the
+       * cut.
+       */
+      const beforeChoiceCut: string = "a".repeat(
+        MICROSOFT_TEAMS_MAX_CHOICE_TITLE_LENGTH - 2,
+      );
+      project.monitors[0]!.name = `${beforeChoiceCut}🔥 checkout, payments`;
+      const beforeTitleCut: string = "b".repeat(cut.titleMaxLength - 1);
+
+      const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+        await deliverLikeTeams(
+          buildMessageActivity({
+            id: nextActivityId("emoji-cut"),
+            text: `${cut.command} ${beforeTitleCut}🔧 and the rest`,
+          }),
+        ),
+      );
+
+      expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+      expect(view.bubbles).toHaveLength(1);
+      const card: JSONObject = cardOf(view.bubbles[0]);
+      /*
+       * Half an emoji is a lone UTF-16 surrogate, which Teams shows as "�"
+       * and a database write turns into U+FFFD. The whole emoji goes.
+       */
+      expect(getElement(card, cut.titleInputId)?.["value"]).toBe(
+        beforeTitleCut,
+      );
+      expect(getElement(card, cut.titleInputId)?.["maxLength"]).toBe(
+        cut.titleMaxLength,
+      );
+      expect(getChoices(card, cut.monitorsChoiceSetId)[0]).toEqual({
+        title: `${beforeChoiceCut}…`,
+        value: project.monitors[0]!._id,
+      });
+    },
+  );
+});
+
+describe("questions for the AI assistant (#4111 review): one answer, and the question stays out of the error log", () => {
+  // A type, not an interface: test.each wants a Record<string, unknown> row.
+  type QuestionCase = {
+    description: string;
+    text: string;
+    // How the error log names the message, since it must not quote it.
+    label: string;
+  };
+
+  const QUESTIONS: Array<QuestionCase> = [
+    {
+      description: "'ask <question>'",
+      text: "ask which monitors are down in eu-west-1?",
+      label: '"ask"',
+    },
+    {
+      description: "a question in plain words",
+      text: "Which monitors are down in eu-west-1?",
+      label: "a 37-character question",
+    },
+  ];
+
+  test.each<QuestionCase>(QUESTIONS)(
+    "$description from a Teams user with no connected account: one reply that says where to connect it, with the link; nothing logged as an error",
+    async (question: QuestionCase) => {
+      // The real account lookup runs, and finds no link.
+      jest
+        .spyOn(MicrosoftTeamsAuthAction, "getOneUptimeUserIdFromTeamsUserId")
+        .mockRestore();
+      jest
+        .spyOn(WorkspaceUserAuthTokenService, "findOneBy")
+        .mockResolvedValue(null);
+
+      const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+        await deliverLikeTeams(
+          buildMessageActivity({
+            id: nextActivityId("question-not-linked"),
+            text: question.text,
+          }),
+        ),
+      );
+
+      expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+      expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+        `To ask OneUptime questions from Microsoft Teams, first connect your Microsoft Teams account to OneUptime in [OneUptime → User Settings → Microsoft Teams](${dashboardLink("/user-settings/microsoft-teams-integration")}), then try again.`,
+      ]);
+      expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+    },
+  );
+
+  test.each<QuestionCase>(QUESTIONS)(
+    "$description whose account lookup fails: the one generic reply with its reference, not 'connect your account'; the log names the message as $label",
+    async (question: QuestionCase) => {
+      const lookupFailure: Error = new Error(
+        "simulated account lookup failure",
+      );
+      jest
+        .spyOn(MicrosoftTeamsAuthAction, "getOneUptimeUserIdFromTeamsUserId")
+        .mockRejectedValue(lookupFailure);
+      const activityId: string = nextActivityId("question-lookup-fails");
+      const activity: JSONObject = buildMessageActivity({
+        id: activityId,
+        text: question.text,
+      });
+
+      const view: TeamsView = viewOf(await deliverLikeTeams(activity));
+
+      /*
+       * Before, any failed lookup was answered as a missing account, which
+       * told a linked user to connect an account they had connected. It is an
+       * unexpected failure like any other.
+       */
+      expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+      expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+        MicrosoftTeamsUtil.getUnexpectedErrorMessage(activity),
+      ]);
+      expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+        `Microsoft Teams message ${activityId} (${question.label}) failed: Error: simulated account lookup failure`,
+        "Error: simulated account lookup failure",
+      ]);
+      expectFailureLogged({
+        at: 0,
+        line: loggedErrors[0]!,
+        error: lookupFailure,
+        attributes: { projectId: projectId.toString() },
+      });
+      // What was asked is for the debug log only.
+      for (const line of loggedErrors) {
+        expect(line).not.toContain("eu-west-1");
+      }
+      expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+    },
+  );
+});
+
+describe("controls: commands that always worked still answer once with HTTP 200", () => {
+  test("'help'", async () => {
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildMessageActivity({ id: nextActivityId("help"), text: "help" }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(view.bubbles).toHaveLength(1);
+    const reply: string = textOf(view.bubbles[0]);
+    expect(reply).toMatch(/^Hello! I'm the OneUptime bot/);
+    // Both create commands take the form's title after them.
+    expect(reply).toContain(
+      "\n- **create incident [title]** - Create a new incident\n- **create maintenance [title]** - Create a new scheduled maintenance event\n",
+    );
+  });
+
+  test("'show scheduled maintenance' (the command the customer saw working)", async () => {
+    jest
+      .spyOn(ScheduledMaintenanceService, "findBy")
+      .mockResolvedValue([] as Array<ScheduledMaintenance>);
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildMessageActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("show-maintenance"),
+          text: "show scheduled maintenance",
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(view.bubbles).toHaveLength(1);
+    expect(textOf(view.bubbles[0])).toContain(
+      "**Scheduled Maintenance Events**",
+    );
+  });
+
+  test("'show scheduled maintenance' with 10 events of 800 monitors each: one reply within the text budget that names 10 monitors per event", async () => {
+    const monitors: Array<Monitor> = namedRows(800, (index: number) => {
+      return `Production HTTP Monitor ${padded(index, 6)}`;
+    }) as unknown as Array<Monitor>;
+    const events: Array<ScheduledMaintenance> = [];
+    for (let index: number = 1; index <= 10; index++) {
+      events.push({
+        id: ObjectID.generate(),
+        title: `Maintenance window ${index}`,
+        description: "Rolling restart of every production monitor host.",
+        startsAt: new Date("2026-10-01T14:00:00.000Z"),
+        endsAt: new Date("2026-10-01T16:00:00.000Z"),
+        currentScheduledMaintenanceState: { name: "Scheduled" },
+        monitors: monitors,
+        scheduledMaintenanceNumber: index,
+      } as unknown as ScheduledMaintenance);
+    }
+    jest.spyOn(ScheduledMaintenanceService, "findBy").mockResolvedValue(events);
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildMessageActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("show-maintenance-800"),
+          text: "show scheduled maintenance",
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    // Listing all 800 names per event was half a megabyte.
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(view.refused).toEqual([]);
+    expect(view.bubbles).toHaveLength(1);
+    const reply: string = textOf(view.bubbles[0]);
+    expect(toUtf16Bytes(reply)).toBeLessThanOrEqual(
+      MICROSOFT_TEAMS_TEXT_MESSAGE_BUDGET_IN_BYTES,
+    );
+    expect(reply.split(" and 790 more").length - 1).toBe(10);
+    expect(reply).toContain(
+      "Production HTTP Monitor 000009, Production HTTP Monitor 000010 and 790 more",
+    );
+    expect(reply).not.toContain("Production HTTP Monitor 000011");
+  });
+
+  test("'show active incidents' at the columns' limits (10 incidents with 500-character titles, 100-character monitor names): one reply cut to the text budget, with a note, accepted at once", async () => {
+    const truncationNote: string =
+      "…\n\n_This reply was shortened to fit in Microsoft Teams. Open OneUptime to see everything._";
+    jest
+      .spyOn(IncidentStateService, "getUnresolvedIncidentStates")
+      .mockResolvedValue([
+        { id: ObjectID.generate() } as unknown as IncidentState,
+      ]);
+    const monitors: Array<Monitor> = namedRows(12, (index: number) => {
+      return toLongName(`Production HTTP Monitor ${padded(index, 6)}`);
+    }) as unknown as Array<Monitor>;
+    const incidents: Array<Incident> = [];
+    for (let index: number = 1; index <= 10; index++) {
+      incidents.push({
+        id: ObjectID.generate(),
+        incidentNumber: index,
+        // An incident title may be 500 characters long.
+        title: (
+          `Incident ${index}: ` +
+          "Checkout API returns 502 for card payments in every region. ".repeat(
+            10,
+          )
+        ).substring(0, 500),
+        description: "Customers cannot pay. ".repeat(20),
+        currentIncidentState: { name: "Investigating" },
+        incidentSeverity: { name: "Critical" },
+        declaredAt: new Date("2026-09-29T09:00:00.000Z"),
+        monitors: monitors,
+      } as unknown as Incident);
+    }
+    jest.spyOn(IncidentService, "findBy").mockResolvedValue(incidents);
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildMessageActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("show-incidents-long"),
+          text: "show active incidents",
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(view.refused).toEqual([]);
+    expect(view.bubbles).toHaveLength(1);
+    const reply: string = textOf(view.bubbles[0]);
+    // Whole, the reply is about 43,000 bytes, over the budget; Teams got it cut.
+    expect(toUtf16Bytes(reply)).toBeLessThanOrEqual(40 * 1024);
+    expect(reply.startsWith("**Active Incidents** (10)\n\n")).toBe(true);
+    expect(reply.endsWith(truncationNote)).toBe(true);
+    const shownIncidents: number =
+      reply.split("• [Open in Dashboard](").length - 1;
+    expect(shownIncidents).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+    expect(shownIncidents).toBeLessThan(10);
+  });
+});
+
+describe("never a 500: whatever fails, Teams gets HTTP 200 and the user one answer", () => {
+  test("tenant resolution throws: one reply that gives the activity id as a reference, HTTP 200 (master: 500 and no reply at all)", async () => {
+    const outage: Error = new Error("simulated database outage");
+    jest
+      .spyOn(MicrosoftTeamsUtil, "resolveProjectByTenantId")
+      .mockRejectedValue(outage);
+    const activityId: string = nextActivityId("tenant-unresolved");
+    const activity: JSONObject = buildMessageActivity({
+      id: activityId,
+      text: "create incident",
+    });
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(await deliverLikeTeams(activity));
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(view.bubbles).toHaveLength(1);
+    const reply: string = textOf(view.bubbles[0]);
+    expect(reply).toBe(MicrosoftTeamsUtil.getUnexpectedErrorMessage(activity));
+    expect(reply).toContain(`reference ${activityId}`);
+    /*
+     * The server log carries the same reference, so it can be found. Logged
+     * by the message handler itself (it names the command): the failure was
+     * handled where it happened, not left to escape to the last-resort guard
+     * in processBotActivity, which logs it differently. The line, then the
+     * error itself, which keeps its stack.
+     */
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      `Microsoft Teams message ${activityId} ("create incident") failed: Error: simulated database outage`,
+      "Error: simulated database outage",
+    ]);
+    // The project was never resolved, so the log cannot name one.
+    expectFailureLogged({
+      at: 0,
+      line: loggedErrors[0]!,
+      error: outage,
+      attributes: { projectId: undefined },
+    });
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("a message handler that throws before replying: one generic reply, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    const handlerBug: Error = new Error("simulated handler bug");
+    jest
+      .spyOn(MicrosoftTeamsUtil, "handleBotMessageActivity")
+      .mockRejectedValue(handlerBug);
+    const activityId: string = nextActivityId("handler-throws");
+    const activity: JSONObject = buildMessageActivity({
+      id: activityId,
+      text: "create incident",
+    });
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(await deliverLikeTeams(activity));
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(
+      view.bubbles.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return call.text;
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([MicrosoftTeamsUtil.getUnexpectedErrorMessage(activity)]);
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      `Microsoft Teams message activity ${activityId} failed: Error: simulated handler bug`,
+      "Error: simulated handler bug",
+    ]);
+    // The error as the handler threw it, through the real botbuilder run.
+    expectFailureLogged({
+      at: 0,
+      line: loggedErrors[0]!,
+      error: handlerBug,
+      attributes: undefined,
+    });
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("a message handler that throws, and Teams refuses the apology too: still HTTP 200, after a single attempt", async () => {
+    jest
+      .spyOn(MicrosoftTeamsUtil, "handleBotMessageActivity")
+      .mockRejectedValue(new Error("simulated handler bug"));
+    connector.refuse = (): ConnectorAnswer => {
+      return MESSAGE_REFUSED_ANSWER;
+    };
+    const activityId: string = nextActivityId("apology-refused");
+    const activity: JSONObject = buildMessageActivity({
+      id: activityId,
+      text: "create incident",
+    });
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(await deliverLikeTeams(activity));
+
+    // The last line of defence cannot itself end the turn in a 500.
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(view.bubbles).toEqual([]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.refused)).toEqual([
+      MicrosoftTeamsUtil.getUnexpectedErrorMessage(activity),
+    ]);
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      `Microsoft Teams message activity ${activityId} failed: Error: simulated handler bug`,
+      "Error: simulated handler bug",
+      "Could not send a Microsoft Teams reply: RestError 403 Forbidden: The message was refused.",
+    ]);
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("a message handler that throws after it replied: no second reply, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    jest
+      .spyOn(MicrosoftTeamsUtil, "handleBotMessageActivity")
+      .mockImplementation(
+        async (data: {
+          activity: JSONObject;
+          turnContext: TurnContext;
+        }): Promise<void> => {
+          await data.turnContext.sendActivity("The only reply.");
+          throw new Error("simulated failure after the reply");
+        },
+      );
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildMessageActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("throws-after-reply"),
+          text: "create incident",
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual(["The only reply."]);
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("an invoke whose handling throws is answered HTTP 200, not 500 (the error) or 501 (no invoke response)", async () => {
+    const invokeFailure: Error = new Error("simulated invoke failure");
+    jest
+      .spyOn(MicrosoftTeamsUtil, "handleBotInvokeActivity")
+      .mockRejectedValue(invokeFailure);
+    const activityId: string = nextActivityId("invoke-throws");
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildInvokeActivity(activityId),
+    );
+
+    expect(
+      deliveries.map((delivery: DeliveryRecord) => {
+        return delivery.httpStatus;
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([200]);
+    // The invoke response travels back in the HTTP answer; nothing is posted.
+    expect(deliveries[0]!.calls).toEqual([]);
+    expect(MicrosoftTeamsUtil.handleBotInvokeActivity).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      `Microsoft Teams invoke activity ${activityId} failed: Error: simulated invoke failure`,
+      "Error: simulated invoke failure",
+    ]);
+    expectFailureLogged({
+      at: 0,
+      line: loggedErrors[0]!,
+      error: invokeFailure,
+      attributes: undefined,
+    });
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("an invoke action that fails inside the handler: one 'that action failed' reply, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    const lookupFailure: Error = new Error(
+      "simulated membership lookup failure",
+    );
+    jest
+      .spyOn(WorkspaceActionAuthorization, "getProjectMemberProps")
+      .mockRejectedValue(lookupFailure);
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildInvokeActivity(nextActivityId("invoke-fails")),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(
+      view.bubbles.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return call.text;
+      }),
+    ).toEqual(["Sorry, that action failed. Please try again later."]);
+    // Answered by the invoke handler itself: nothing escaped to the guard.
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      "Error handling bot invoke activity: Error: simulated membership lookup failure",
+      "Error: simulated membership lookup failure",
+    ]);
+    expectFailureLogged({
+      at: 0,
+      line: loggedErrors[0]!,
+      error: lookupFailure,
+      attributes: {
+        actionType: MicrosoftTeamsIncidentActionType.AckIncident,
+        projectId: projectId.toString(),
+      },
+    });
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("a submitted form whose action fails, and Teams refuses the apology too: HTTP 200 after a single attempt, and no second apology", async () => {
+    jest
+      .spyOn(WorkspaceActionAuthorization, "getProjectMemberProps")
+      .mockRejectedValue(new Error("simulated membership lookup failure"));
+    connector.refuse = (): ConnectorAnswer => {
+      return MESSAGE_REFUSED_ANSWER;
+    };
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildCardSubmitActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("submit-apology-refused"),
+          replyToId: "msg-incident-form",
+          value: {
+            action: MicrosoftTeamsIncidentActionType.SubmitNewIncident,
+          },
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(view.bubbles).toEqual([]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.refused)).toEqual([
+      "Sorry, that action failed. Please try again later.",
+    ]);
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      "Error handling bot invoke activity: Error: simulated membership lookup failure",
+      "Error: simulated membership lookup failure",
+      "Could not send a Microsoft Teams reply: RestError 403 Forbidden: The message was refused.",
+    ]);
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  // A type, not an interface: test.each wants a Record<string, unknown> row.
+  type BotAddedCase = {
+    type: BotAddedActivityType;
+    handler:
+      | "handleConversationUpdateActivity"
+      | "handleInstallationUpdateActivity";
+  };
+
+  test.each<BotAddedCase>([
+    {
+      type: "conversationUpdate",
+      handler: "handleConversationUpdateActivity",
+    },
+    {
+      type: "installationUpdate",
+      handler: "handleInstallationUpdateActivity",
+    },
+  ])(
+    "the bot added to a chat, announced as $type, and the handler throws: HTTP 200, logged, and nothing posted in a chat nobody wrote in (master: 500, so Teams sent it again)",
+    async (botAdded: BotAddedCase) => {
+      const installFailure: Error = new Error("simulated install failure");
+      jest
+        .spyOn(MicrosoftTeamsUtil, botAdded.handler)
+        .mockRejectedValue(installFailure);
+      const activityId: string = nextActivityId(botAdded.type);
+
+      const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildBotAddedActivity(botAdded.type, activityId),
+      );
+
+      expect(
+        deliveries.map((delivery: DeliveryRecord) => {
+          return delivery.httpStatus;
+        }),
+      ).toEqual([200]);
+      expect(deliveries[0]!.calls).toEqual([]);
+      expect(MicrosoftTeamsUtil[botAdded.handler]).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+        `Microsoft Teams ${botAdded.type} activity ${activityId} failed: Error: simulated install failure`,
+        "Error: simulated install failure",
+      ]);
+      expectFailureLogged({
+        at: 0,
+        line: loggedErrors[0]!,
+        error: installFailure,
+        attributes: undefined,
+      });
+      expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+    },
+  );
+});
+
+describe("submitting the form (#4111): confirmed first, then the form is removed, best-effort", () => {
+  const CREATED_INCIDENT_ID: ObjectID = ObjectID.generate();
+
+  interface OpenedIncidentForm {
+    project: ProjectData;
+    formId: string;
+    card: JSONObject;
+  }
+
+  // Asks for the form the way a user does, and returns the card Teams got.
+  async function openIncidentForm(
+    conversation: ConversationKind = "personal",
+  ): Promise<OpenedIncidentForm> {
+    const project: ProjectData = stubProjectData({
+      monitors: 5,
+      labels: 3,
+      onCallPolicies: 2,
+    });
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildMessageActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("open-form"),
+          text: "create incident Checkout API returns 502",
+          conversation: conversation,
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual(["Create New Incident"]);
+    const form: ConnectorCall = view.bubbles[0]!;
+
+    return {
+      project: project,
+      formId: form.messageId || "",
+      card: cardOf(form),
+    };
+  }
+
+  // What the card's inputs hold after the user filled it in.
+  function filledInIncidentForm(opened: OpenedIncidentForm): JSONObject {
+    return {
+      ...getSubmitData(opened.card),
+      incidentTitle: `  ${String(getElement(opened.card, "incidentTitle")?.["value"])}  `,
+      incidentDescription: "Customers cannot pay.",
+      incidentSeverity: getChoiceValues(opened.card, "incidentSeverity")[0]!,
+      incidentMonitors: getChoiceValues(opened.card, "incidentMonitors")
+        .slice(0, 2)
+        .join(","),
+      monitorStatus: getChoiceValues(opened.card, "monitorStatus")[2]!,
+    };
+  }
+
+  function stubIncidentCreate(): void {
+    jest.spyOn(IncidentService, "create").mockImplementation(() => {
+      const created: Incident = new Incident();
+      created.id = CREATED_INCIDENT_ID;
+      return Promise.resolve(created);
+    });
+    jest
+      .spyOn(
+        WorkspaceProjectReferenceValidator,
+        "validateReferencesBelongToProject",
+      )
+      .mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+  }
+
+  function createdIncidentData(): Incident {
+    const createSpy: ReturnType<typeof jest.spyOn> = jest.spyOn(
+      IncidentService,
+      "create",
+    );
+    const firstCall: Array<unknown> | undefined = createSpy.mock.calls[0];
+    return (firstCall?.[0] as { data: Incident }).data;
+  }
+
+  // What the user reads once the incident exists.
+  function incidentCreatedConfirmation(): string {
+    return `✅ Incident created successfully!\n\nView incident: ${dashboardLink(`/incidents/${CREATED_INCIDENT_ID.toString()}`)}`;
+  }
+
+  test("the confirmation is posted, then the form is deleted; the incident has what the form offered and the user chose", async () => {
+    const opened: OpenedIncidentForm = await openIncidentForm();
+    // "create incident <title>" filled the title in, as typed.
+    expect(getElement(opened.card, "incidentTitle")?.["value"]).toBe(
+      "Checkout API returns 502",
+    );
+    expect(opened.formId).not.toBe("");
+    stubIncidentCreate();
+    const submitId: string = nextActivityId("submit-incident");
+    const value: JSONObject = filledInIncidentForm(opened);
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildCardSubmitActivity({
+        id: submitId,
+        replyToId: opened.formId,
+        value: value,
+      }),
+    );
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(deliveries);
+
+    expect(value["action"]).toBe(
+      MicrosoftTeamsIncidentActionType.SubmitNewIncident,
+    );
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(
+      deliveries[0]!.calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.method, call.label, call.connectorStatus];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      ["POST", incidentCreatedConfirmation(), 200],
+      ["DELETE", opened.formId, 200],
+    ]);
+    // The confirmation answers the submit; the DELETE removes the form.
+    expect(view.bubbles[0]!.activityIdInPath).toBe(submitId);
+    expect(view.deletes[0]!.conversationId).toBe(PERSONAL_CONVERSATION_ID);
+
+    expect(IncidentService.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    const incident: Incident = createdIncidentData();
+    expect(incident.title).toBe("Checkout API returns 502");
+    expect(incident.description).toBe("Customers cannot pay.");
+    expect(incident.projectId?.toString()).toBe(projectId.toString());
+    expect(incident.createdByUserId?.toString()).toBe(
+      ONEUPTIME_USER_ID.toString(),
+    );
+    expect(incident.incidentSeverityId?.toString()).toBe(
+      opened.project.severities[0]!._id,
+    );
+    expect(
+      (incident.monitors || []).map((monitor: Monitor) => {
+        return monitor.id?.toString();
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      opened.project.monitors[0]!._id,
+      opened.project.monitors[1]!._id,
+    ]);
+    // The status change goes through the incident, not onto the monitors.
+    expect(incident.changeMonitorStatusToId?.toString()).toBe(
+      opened.project.monitorStatuses[2]!._id,
+    );
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("the form cannot be deleted (404): the user still sees only the confirmation, nothing that says it failed, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    const opened: OpenedIncidentForm = await openIncidentForm();
+    stubIncidentCreate();
+    connector.deleteStatus = 404;
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildCardSubmitActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("submit-delete-404"),
+          replyToId: opened.formId,
+          value: filledInIncidentForm(opened),
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(
+      view.deletes.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.label, call.connectorStatus];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([[opened.formId, 404]]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([incidentCreatedConfirmation()]);
+    expect(IncidentService.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    // Removing the form is a courtesy: its failure is not even an error log.
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("Teams refuses the confirmation (a 403, which the connector does not retry): one incident, nothing says the create failed, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    const opened: OpenedIncidentForm = await openIncidentForm();
+    stubIncidentCreate();
+    connector.refuse = (request: ConnectorRequest): ConnectorAnswer | null => {
+      const text: unknown = request.activity?.["text"];
+      return request.method === "POST" &&
+        typeof text === "string" &&
+        text.startsWith("✅")
+        ? MESSAGE_REFUSED_ANSWER
+        : null;
+    };
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildCardSubmitActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("submit-confirmation-refused"),
+          replyToId: opened.formId,
+          value: filledInIncidentForm(opened),
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    /*
+     * master: the refusal landed in the create's catch, which answered
+     * "❌ Failed to create incident. Please try again." for an incident that
+     * existed, inviting a second one.
+     */
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(IncidentService.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    // The confirmation is the only message the bot even tried to post.
+    expect(
+      view.refused.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.label, call.connectorStatus];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([[incidentCreatedConfirmation(), 403]]);
+    expect(view.bubbles).toEqual([]);
+    // The operator can see why the user got no confirmation.
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      "Could not send a Microsoft Teams reply: RestError 403 Forbidden: The message was refused.",
+    ]);
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("the same submit delivered twice creates one incident and confirms once", async () => {
+    const opened: OpenedIncidentForm = await openIncidentForm();
+    stubIncidentCreate();
+    const submit: JSONObject = buildCardSubmitActivity({
+      id: nextActivityId("submit-redelivered"),
+      replyToId: opened.formId,
+      value: filledInIncidentForm(opened),
+    });
+
+    const first: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(submit);
+    const repeat: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(submit);
+
+    expect([first.httpStatus, repeat.httpStatus]).toEqual([200, 200]);
+    expect(
+      first.calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return call.method;
+      }),
+    ).toEqual(["POST", "DELETE"]);
+    expect(repeat.calls).toEqual([]);
+    expect(IncidentService.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+  });
+
+  // A type, not an interface: test.each wants a Record<string, unknown> row.
+  type RedisStoryCase = {
+    story: string;
+    // What Redis answers the claim of the first delivery: taken, or down.
+    firstClaim: "taken" | "down";
+  };
+
+  /*
+   * The claim is shared through Redis and remembered in this process too. A
+   * redelivery must be dropped whatever Redis says in between: a Redis that
+   * has no record of the first claim answers "not claimed yet".
+   */
+  test.each<RedisStoryCase>([
+    {
+      story:
+        "Redis was down for the first delivery and is back, with no record of it, for the redelivery",
+      firstClaim: "down",
+    },
+    {
+      story:
+        "Redis took the first claim and lost it (a restart) before the redelivery",
+      firstClaim: "taken",
+    },
+  ])(
+    "the same submit delivered twice while $story: still one incident, and the redelivery posts nothing",
+    async (redis: RedisStoryCase) => {
+      const opened: OpenedIncidentForm = await openIncidentForm();
+      stubIncidentCreate();
+      const claimInRedis: SpyInstance<typeof GlobalCache.setStringIfNotExists> =
+        jest.spyOn(GlobalCache, "setStringIfNotExists");
+      if (redis.firstClaim === "down") {
+        claimInRedis.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error("Cache is not connected"));
+      } else {
+        claimInRedis.mockResolvedValueOnce(true);
+      }
+      // Asked again for the redelivery, Redis finds no key and sets it.
+      claimInRedis.mockResolvedValueOnce(true);
+      const submit: JSONObject = buildCardSubmitActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("submit-redis-story"),
+        replyToId: opened.formId,
+        value: filledInIncidentForm(opened),
+      });
+
+      const first: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(submit);
+      const redelivery: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(submit);
+
+      /*
+       * Redis is asked for both, so that other App instances learn of the
+       * claim, but this process's memory decides the redelivery first.
+       */
+      expect(claimInRedis).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
+      // A second incident would page its on-call policies a second time.
+      expect(IncidentService.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      expect([first.httpStatus, redelivery.httpStatus]).toEqual([200, 200]);
+      expect(
+        first.calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+          return call.method;
+        }),
+      ).toEqual(["POST", "DELETE"]);
+      expect(redelivery.calls).toEqual([]);
+      /*
+       * No Redis client in this process (as in a test or a script), so there
+       * is no other instance to miss the claim: the fallback is not an error.
+       */
+      expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+    },
+  );
+
+  test("Redis is configured but down: every message is still answered once and a redelivery still dropped, and the operator hears of the fallback once a minute, not once a message", async () => {
+    stubProjectData({ monitors: 5 });
+    /*
+     * A client whose connection dropped: GlobalCache refuses every claim with
+     * "Cache is not connected", and the dedupe falls back to memory.
+     */
+    jest
+      .spyOn(Redis, "getClient")
+      .mockReturnValue(
+        {} as unknown as NonNullable<ReturnType<typeof Redis.getClient>>,
+      );
+    /*
+     * The clock the once-a-minute throttle reads, stopped a day ahead of any
+     * fallback an earlier test could have logged.
+     */
+    const start: number = Date.now() + 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000;
+    stopTheClockAt(new Date(start));
+    const firstMessage: JSONObject = buildMessageActivity({
+      id: nextActivityId("redis-down-first"),
+      text: "create incident",
+    });
+
+    const first: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(firstMessage);
+    const redelivery: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(firstMessage);
+    jest.setSystemTime(start + 59 * 1000);
+    const withinTheMinute: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(
+      buildMessageActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("redis-down-within-minute"),
+        text: "create incident",
+      }),
+    );
+    jest.setSystemTime(start + 61 * 1000);
+    const afterTheMinute: DeliveryRecord = await deliverOnce(
+      buildMessageActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("redis-down-after-minute"),
+        text: "create incident",
+      }),
+    );
+
+    expect(
+      [first, redelivery, withinTheMinute, afterTheMinute].map(
+        (delivery: DeliveryRecord) => {
+          return delivery.httpStatus;
+        },
+      ),
+    ).toEqual([200, 200, 200, 200]);
+    expect(labelsOf(first.calls)).toEqual(["Create New Incident"]);
+    expect(redelivery.calls).toEqual([]);
+    expect(labelsOf(withinTheMinute.calls)).toEqual(["Create New Incident"]);
+    expect(labelsOf(afterTheMinute.calls)).toEqual(["Create New Incident"]);
+
+    // Four claims fell back; the first and the one a minute later are logged.
+    const fallback: string =
+      "Microsoft Teams activity dedupe fell back to this process's memory (Redis refused the claim); a Teams redelivery that reaches another App instance may be handled twice.";
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      fallback,
+      "Error: Cache is not connected",
+      fallback,
+      "Error: Cache is not connected",
+    ]);
+    // Tagged as infrastructure, not as a fault in the code.
+    for (const call of loggedErrorCalls) {
+      expect(call.attributes).toStrictEqual({
+        [ERROR_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE_KEY]: ErrorClass.Infrastructure,
+      });
+    }
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("a submit that carries another project's monitor (a tampered card): the real reference check refuses it, and the one '❌' reply says so in fixed words that never name that monitor; nothing is created and the form stays, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    const opened: OpenedIncidentForm = await openIncidentForm();
+    stubIncidentCreate();
+    // The reference check itself runs; only the records it reads are stubbed.
+    jest
+      .spyOn(
+        WorkspaceProjectReferenceValidator,
+        "validateReferencesBelongToProject",
+      )
+      .mockRestore();
+    const offeredMonitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+    offeredMonitor.id = new ObjectID(opened.project.monitors[0]!._id);
+    offeredMonitor.name = opened.project.monitors[0]!.name;
+    offeredMonitor.projectId = projectId;
+    const foreignMonitor: Monitor = new Monitor();
+    foreignMonitor.id = ObjectID.generate();
+    foreignMonitor.name = "Payments API";
+    foreignMonitor.projectId = ObjectID.generate();
+    jest
+      .spyOn(MonitorService, "findBy")
+      .mockResolvedValue([offeredMonitor, foreignMonitor]);
+    const pickedStatus: MonitorStatus = new MonitorStatus();
+    pickedStatus.id = new ObjectID(opened.project.monitorStatuses[2]!._id);
+    pickedStatus.name = opened.project.monitorStatuses[2]!.name;
+    pickedStatus.projectId = projectId;
+    jest
+      .spyOn(MonitorStatusService, "findBy")
+      .mockResolvedValue([pickedStatus]);
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildCardSubmitActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("submit-foreign-monitor"),
+        replyToId: opened.formId,
+        value: {
+          ...filledInIncidentForm(opened),
+          // A monitor the form offered, and one it never could have.
+          incidentMonitors: `${opened.project.monitors[0]!._id},${foreignMonitor.id!.toString()}`,
+        },
+      }),
+    );
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(deliveries);
+
+    // master: "❌ Failed to create incident. Please try again." and no reason.
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(
+      deliveries[0]!.calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.method, call.label, call.connectorStatus];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      [
+        "POST",
+        "❌ Could not create the incident: One of the values you picked (a monitor, label, on-call policy, severity or status) is not available in this project any more. Please pick it again.",
+        200,
+      ],
+    ]);
+    expect(MICROSOFT_TEAMS_UNAVAILABLE_REFERENCE_MESSAGE).toBe(
+      "One of the values you picked (a monitor, label, on-call policy, severity or status) is not available in this project any more. Please pick it again.",
+    );
+    // The other project's monitor is named to nobody in the chat.
+    for (const call of deliveries[0]!.calls) {
+      expect(JSON.stringify(call.label)).not.toContain("Payments API");
+    }
+    // Nothing was created, and the form was left for a corrected submit.
+    expect(IncidentService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(view.deletes).toEqual([]);
+    /*
+     * The operator log does name it, with the class it was refused as: a
+     * BadDataException with the same message, so API callers see no change.
+     */
+    const reason: string =
+      'This incident references records that belong to a different project: Monitor "Payments API". Please pick values from this project and try again.';
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      `Could not create an incident from Microsoft Teams: ProjectScopedReferenceException: ${reason}`,
+      `Error: ${reason}`,
+    ]);
+    const refusal: unknown = loggedErrorCalls[1]?.message;
+    expect(refusal).toBeInstanceOf(ProjectScopedReferenceException);
+    expect(refusal).toBeInstanceOf(BadDataException);
+    expectFailureLogged({
+      at: 0,
+      line: loggedErrors[0]!,
+      error: refusal,
+      attributes: { projectId: projectId.toString() },
+    });
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("the create fails unexpectedly: the one '❌' reply says to try again or create it in OneUptime, with the link; nothing says why, the log does; the form stays, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    const opened: OpenedIncidentForm = await openIncidentForm();
+    stubIncidentCreate();
+    const databaseFailure: Error = new Error(
+      "simulated database failure: connection terminated",
+    );
+    jest.spyOn(IncidentService, "create").mockRejectedValue(databaseFailure);
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildCardSubmitActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("submit-create-fails"),
+        replyToId: opened.formId,
+        value: filledInIncidentForm(opened),
+      }),
+    );
+
+    expect(
+      deliveries.map((delivery: DeliveryRecord) => {
+        return delivery.httpStatus;
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(
+      deliveries[0]!.calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.method, call.label, call.connectorStatus];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      [
+        "POST",
+        `❌ Could not create the incident because of an unexpected error. Please try again, or create it in OneUptime: ${dashboardLink("/incidents/create")}`,
+        200,
+      ],
+    ]);
+    expect(IncidentService.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      "Could not create an incident from Microsoft Teams: Error: simulated database failure: connection terminated",
+      "Error: simulated database failure: connection terminated",
+    ]);
+    expectFailureLogged({
+      at: 0,
+      line: loggedErrors[0]!,
+      error: databaseFailure,
+      attributes: { projectId: projectId.toString() },
+    });
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("the create fails unexpectedly and OneUptime does not know its dashboard URL: the same reply, without a link", async () => {
+    const opened: OpenedIncidentForm = await openIncidentForm();
+    stubIncidentCreate();
+    jest
+      .spyOn(IncidentService, "create")
+      .mockRejectedValue(new Error("simulated database failure"));
+    withoutDashboardUrl();
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildCardSubmitActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("submit-create-fails-no-link"),
+          replyToId: opened.formId,
+          value: filledInIncidentForm(opened),
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+      "❌ Could not create the incident because of an unexpected error. Please try again, or create it in OneUptime.",
+    ]);
+    expect(view.deletes).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  /*
+   * DELIBERATE, not an oversight: creating an incident from chat asks for
+   * membership of the project, not for permission to create incidents. Slack
+   * has the same policy, written down with its auth ("anyone in the company
+   * can create incident", Server/Utils/Workspace/Slack/Actions/Auth.ts), and
+   * commit 7ac7a3a03f, which put every other chat write behind the member's
+   * own permissions, left incident creation as it was. A scheduled
+   * maintenance event does need the permission (see the maintenance submit
+   * tests). Change the product decision there before changing this.
+   */
+  test("a member whose role may not create incidents (a read-only Viewer) still creates one from the form: the real membership check runs, the permission check does not", async () => {
+    const opened: OpenedIncidentForm = await openIncidentForm();
+    stubIncidentCreate();
+    useRealMembershipCheck([Permission.Viewer]);
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildCardSubmitActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("submit-viewer"),
+        replyToId: opened.formId,
+        value: filledInIncidentForm(opened),
+      }),
+    );
+
+    expect(
+      deliveries.map((delivery: DeliveryRecord) => {
+        return delivery.httpStatus;
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(
+      deliveries[0]!.calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.method, call.label, call.connectorStatus];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      ["POST", incidentCreatedConfirmation(), 200],
+      ["DELETE", opened.formId, 200],
+    ]);
+    expect(IncidentService.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    // Membership was read from the database, for this user in this project.
+    expect(TeamMemberService.findBy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    expect(TeamMemberService.findBy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      expect.objectContaining({
+        query: {
+          userId: ONEUPTIME_USER_ID,
+          projectId: projectId,
+          hasAcceptedInvitation: true,
+        },
+      }),
+    );
+    expect(WorkspaceActionAuthorization.assertCanCreate).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+
+    // Not for want of a check that would refuse this member: it would.
+    const viewerProps: DatabaseCommonInteractionProps =
+      await WorkspaceActionAuthorization.getProjectMemberProps({
+        userId: ONEUPTIME_USER_ID,
+        projectId: projectId,
+      });
+    await expect(
+      WorkspaceActionAuthorization.assertCanCreate({
+        props: viewerProps,
+        modelType: Incident,
+        action: "create an incident",
+      }),
+    ).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(NotAuthorizedException);
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("a Teams user who is no longer a member of the project is refused: one reply that says so, nothing created, the form stays, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    const opened: OpenedIncidentForm = await openIncidentForm();
+    stubIncidentCreate();
+    useRealMembershipCheck(null);
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildCardSubmitActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("submit-not-member"),
+          replyToId: opened.formId,
+          value: filledInIncidentForm(opened),
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+      "Your OneUptime account is not a member of this project. Ask a project admin to invite you, then try again.",
+    ]);
+    expect(IncidentService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(view.deletes).toEqual([]);
+    // A refusal, not a server error.
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("a form submitted in a group chat (Teams sends the submit without an @mention): created, confirmed and removed there, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    const opened: OpenedIncidentForm = await openIncidentForm("groupChat");
+    stubIncidentCreate();
+    const submitId: string = nextActivityId("submit-group-chat");
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildCardSubmitActivity({
+        id: submitId,
+        replyToId: opened.formId,
+        value: filledInIncidentForm(opened),
+        conversation: "groupChat",
+      }),
+    );
+
+    expect(
+      deliveries.map((delivery: DeliveryRecord) => {
+        return delivery.httpStatus;
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(
+      deliveries[0]!.calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [
+          call.method,
+          call.conversationId,
+          call.activityIdInPath,
+          call.connectorStatus,
+        ];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      ["POST", GROUP_CONVERSATION_ID, submitId, 200],
+      ["DELETE", GROUP_CONVERSATION_ID, opened.formId, 200],
+    ]);
+    expect(labelsOf(deliveries[0]!.calls)[0]).toBe(
+      incidentCreatedConfirmation(),
+    );
+    expect(IncidentService.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+  });
+});
+
+describe("submitting the maintenance form: start and end are read in the zone the form named, else the submitter's, through the real adapter", () => {
+  const CREATED_MAINTENANCE_ID: ObjectID = ObjectID.generate();
+
+  function stubMaintenanceCreate(): void {
+    jest.spyOn(ScheduledMaintenanceService, "create").mockImplementation(() => {
+      const created: ScheduledMaintenance = new ScheduledMaintenance();
+      created.id = CREATED_MAINTENANCE_ID;
+      return Promise.resolve(created);
+    });
+    jest
+      .spyOn(
+        WorkspaceProjectReferenceValidator,
+        "validateReferencesBelongToProject",
+      )
+      .mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+  }
+
+  function createdMaintenanceData(): ScheduledMaintenance {
+    const createSpy: ReturnType<typeof jest.spyOn> = jest.spyOn(
+      ScheduledMaintenanceService,
+      "create",
+    );
+    const firstCall: Array<unknown> | undefined = createSpy.mock.calls[0];
+    return (firstCall?.[0] as { data: ScheduledMaintenance }).data;
+  }
+
+  function maintenanceFormValue(data: {
+    day: string;
+    timezone?: string | undefined;
+    // What the user picked from the form's optional lists, by input id.
+    picked?: JSONObject | undefined;
+  }): JSONObject {
+    return {
+      action:
+        MicrosoftTeamsScheduledMaintenanceActionType.SubmitNewScheduledMaintenance,
+      ...(data.timezone ? { timezone: data.timezone } : {}),
+      scheduledMaintenanceTitle: "Database Upgrade Window",
+      scheduledMaintenanceDescription: "Upgrading the primary database.",
+      startDate: data.day,
+      startTime: "14:00",
+      endDate: data.day,
+      endTime: "16:00",
+      ...(data.picked || {}),
+    };
+  }
+
+  test("a client that sends no zone on the submit (as iOS does): read in the zone the form was sent for, echoed back, and only then is the form removed", async () => {
+    stubMaintenanceCreate();
+    const day: string = moment
+      .tz(SENDER_TIMEZONE)
+      .add(7, "days")
+      .format("YYYY-MM-DD");
+    const monitorIds: Array<string> = [
+      ObjectID.generate().toString(),
+      ObjectID.generate().toString(),
+    ];
+    const monitorStatusId: string = ObjectID.generate().toString();
+    const labelId: string = ObjectID.generate().toString();
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildCardSubmitActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("submit-maintenance-card-zone"),
+        replyToId: "msg-maintenance-form",
+        value: maintenanceFormValue({
+          day: day,
+          timezone: SENDER_TIMEZONE,
+          picked: {
+            scheduledMaintenanceMonitors: monitorIds.join(","),
+            monitorStatus: monitorStatusId,
+            labels: labelId,
+          },
+        }),
+      }),
+    );
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(deliveries);
+
+    const startsAt: Date = moment
+      .tz(`${day} 14:00`, "YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm", SENDER_TIMEZONE)
+      .toDate();
+    const endsAt: Date = moment
+      .tz(`${day} 16:00`, "YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm", SENDER_TIMEZONE)
+      .toDate();
+    const dayAsRead: string = moment
+      .tz(day, "YYYY-MM-DD", SENDER_TIMEZONE)
+      .format("MMM D, YYYY");
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    // master removed the form first, and a failed removal hid the confirmation.
+    expect(
+      deliveries[0]!.calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.method, call.label, call.connectorStatus];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      [
+        "POST",
+        `✅ Scheduled maintenance created successfully!\n\n**Starts:** ${dayAsRead}, 14:00 (${SENDER_TIMEZONE})\n\n**Ends:** ${dayAsRead}, 16:00 (${SENDER_TIMEZONE})\n\nView scheduled maintenance: ${dashboardLink(`/scheduled-maintenance-events/${CREATED_MAINTENANCE_ID.toString()}`)}`,
+        200,
+      ],
+      ["DELETE", "msg-maintenance-form", 200],
+    ]);
+
+    expect(ScheduledMaintenanceService.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    const maintenance: ScheduledMaintenance = createdMaintenanceData();
+    expect(maintenance.startsAt?.toISOString()).toBe(startsAt.toISOString());
+    expect(maintenance.endsAt?.toISOString()).toBe(endsAt.toISOString());
+    expect(maintenance.title).toBe("Database Upgrade Window");
+    expect(maintenance.projectId?.toString()).toBe(projectId.toString());
+    expect(maintenance.createdByUserId?.toString()).toBe(
+      ONEUPTIME_USER_ID.toString(),
+    );
+    expect(
+      (maintenance.monitors || []).map((monitor: Monitor) => {
+        return monitor.id?.toString();
+      }),
+    ).toEqual(monitorIds);
+    expect(
+      (maintenance.labels || []).map((label: Label) => {
+        return label.id?.toString();
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([labelId]);
+    // The status change goes through the event, not onto the monitors.
+    expect(maintenance.changeMonitorStatusToId?.toString()).toBe(
+      monitorStatusId,
+    );
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("no zone anywhere: read at the UTC offset of the activity's local timestamp, which botbuilder hands over as rawLocalTimestamp, and the reply says it was read at that offset", async () => {
+    stubMaintenanceCreate();
+    const day: string = moment.utc().add(7, "days").format("YYYY-MM-DD");
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildCardSubmitActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("submit-maintenance-offset"),
+          replyToId: "msg-maintenance-form-2",
+          localTimestamp: "2026-09-29T15:35:00.000+05:30",
+          value: maintenanceFormValue({ day: day }),
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    const dayAsRead: string = moment
+      .utc(day, "YYYY-MM-DD")
+      .format("MMM D, YYYY");
+
+    /*
+     * Today's offset, which a daylight saving change before the event would
+     * make an hour out: the reply says so, and where to check.
+     */
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+      `✅ Scheduled maintenance created successfully!\n\n**Starts:** ${dayAsRead}, 14:00 (UTC+05:30)\n\n**Ends:** ${dayAsRead}, 16:00 (UTC+05:30)\n\nMicrosoft Teams did not say which time zone you are in, so these times were read at your current offset, UTC+05:30. If daylight saving time changes before then, check them in OneUptime.\n\nView scheduled maintenance: ${dashboardLink(`/scheduled-maintenance-events/${CREATED_MAINTENANCE_ID.toString()}`)}`,
+    ]);
+
+    // 14:00 at UTC+05:30 is 08:30 UTC.
+    const maintenance: ScheduledMaintenance = createdMaintenanceData();
+    expect(maintenance.startsAt?.toISOString()).toBe(`${day}T08:30:00.000Z`);
+    expect(maintenance.endsAt?.toISOString()).toBe(`${day}T10:30:00.000Z`);
+  });
+
+  test("a form sent to a group chat for New York, filled in by someone whose Teams says Berlin: read in New York, the zone the form named, and named back", async () => {
+    stubMaintenanceCreate();
+    const day: string = moment
+      .tz(SENDER_TIMEZONE)
+      .add(7, "days")
+      .format("YYYY-MM-DD");
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildCardSubmitActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("submit-maintenance-other-zone"),
+        replyToId: "msg-maintenance-form-group",
+        conversation: "groupChat",
+        from: OTHER_MEMBER,
+        localTimezone: "Europe/Berlin",
+        localTimestamp: "2026-09-29T12:05:00.000+02:00",
+        value: maintenanceFormValue({ day: day, timezone: SENDER_TIMEZONE }),
+      }),
+    );
+
+    const dayAsRead: string = moment
+      .tz(day, "YYYY-MM-DD", SENDER_TIMEZONE)
+      .format("MMM D, YYYY");
+
+    /*
+     * The form told whoever filled it in that its times are in New York, so
+     * 14:00 is 14:00 there: read in Berlin, the event would start six hours
+     * early.
+     */
+    expect(
+      deliveries.map((delivery: DeliveryRecord) => {
+        return delivery.httpStatus;
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(
+      deliveries[0]!.calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.method, call.conversationId, call.label];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      [
+        "POST",
+        GROUP_CONVERSATION_ID,
+        `✅ Scheduled maintenance created successfully!\n\n**Starts:** ${dayAsRead}, 14:00 (${SENDER_TIMEZONE})\n\n**Ends:** ${dayAsRead}, 16:00 (${SENDER_TIMEZONE})\n\nView scheduled maintenance: ${dashboardLink(`/scheduled-maintenance-events/${CREATED_MAINTENANCE_ID.toString()}`)}`,
+      ],
+      ["DELETE", GROUP_CONVERSATION_ID, "msg-maintenance-form-group"],
+    ]);
+    const maintenance: ScheduledMaintenance = createdMaintenanceData();
+    expect(maintenance.startsAt?.toISOString()).toBe(
+      moment
+        .tz(`${day} 14:00`, "YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm", SENDER_TIMEZONE)
+        .toDate()
+        .toISOString(),
+    );
+    // Created by whoever submitted it, as their own linked account.
+    expect(
+      MicrosoftTeamsAuthAction.getOneUptimeUserIdFromTeamsUserId,
+    ).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+      teamsUserId: OTHER_MEMBER["aadObjectId"],
+      projectId: projectId,
+    });
+  });
+
+  // A type, not an interface: test.each wants a Record<string, unknown> row.
+  type JustGoneByCase = {
+    description: string;
+    // When the submit arrives: October 6, 2026, on the clock in New York.
+    arrivesAt: string;
+    endTime: string;
+    // The one reply.
+    reply: string;
+    // When the event starts, if it was created.
+    startsAt: string | null;
+  };
+
+  /*
+   * Input.Time has minute precision, so a start picked as "now" is a minute
+   * or two in the past by the time the form is filled in. A start up to five
+   * minutes gone by begins now; an older one is refused, as before.
+   */
+  test.each<JustGoneByCase>([
+    {
+      description: "4:59 ago: the event is created, starting now",
+      arrivesAt: "14:04:59",
+      endTime: "16:00",
+      reply: `✅ Scheduled maintenance created successfully!\n\n**Starts:** Oct 6, 2026, 14:04 (${SENDER_TIMEZONE})\n\n**Ends:** Oct 6, 2026, 16:00 (${SENDER_TIMEZONE})\n\nView scheduled maintenance: `,
+      startsAt: "2026-10-06T18:04:59.000Z",
+    },
+    {
+      description: "exactly 5:00 ago: still created, starting now",
+      arrivesAt: "14:05:00",
+      endTime: "16:00",
+      reply: `✅ Scheduled maintenance created successfully!\n\n**Starts:** Oct 6, 2026, 14:05 (${SENDER_TIMEZONE})\n\n**Ends:** Oct 6, 2026, 16:00 (${SENDER_TIMEZONE})\n\nView scheduled maintenance: `,
+      startsAt: "2026-10-06T18:05:00.000Z",
+    },
+    {
+      description: "5:01 ago: refused as in the past",
+      arrivesAt: "14:05:01",
+      endTime: "16:00",
+      reply: `Unable to create scheduled maintenance: the start time (Oct 6, 2026, 14:00 (${SENDER_TIMEZONE})) is in the past.`,
+      startsAt: null,
+    },
+    {
+      description:
+        "4:59 ago, but ending before now: refused, the end must come after the start it was moved to",
+      arrivesAt: "14:04:59",
+      endTime: "14:03",
+      reply: `Unable to create scheduled maintenance: the end time (Oct 6, 2026, 14:03 (${SENDER_TIMEZONE})) must be after the start time (Oct 6, 2026, 14:04 (${SENDER_TIMEZONE})).`,
+      startsAt: null,
+    },
+  ])(
+    "a start of 14:00 that has just gone by, $description",
+    async (goneBy: JustGoneByCase) => {
+      stubMaintenanceCreate();
+      stopTheClockAt(
+        moment
+          .tz(
+            `2026-10-06 ${goneBy.arrivesAt}`,
+            "YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss",
+            SENDER_TIMEZONE,
+          )
+          .toDate(),
+      );
+
+      const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildCardSubmitActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("submit-maintenance-just-gone-by"),
+          replyToId: "msg-maintenance-form-now",
+          value: {
+            ...maintenanceFormValue({
+              day: "2026-10-06",
+              timezone: SENDER_TIMEZONE,
+            }),
+            endTime: goneBy.endTime,
+          },
+        }),
+      );
+      const view: TeamsView = viewOf(deliveries);
+
+      expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+      expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+        goneBy.startsAt
+          ? `${goneBy.reply}${dashboardLink(`/scheduled-maintenance-events/${CREATED_MAINTENANCE_ID.toString()}`)}`
+          : goneBy.reply,
+      ]);
+
+      if (goneBy.startsAt) {
+        expect(ScheduledMaintenanceService.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+        const maintenance: ScheduledMaintenance = createdMaintenanceData();
+        expect(maintenance.startsAt?.toISOString()).toBe(goneBy.startsAt);
+        expect(maintenance.endsAt?.toISOString()).toBe(
+          "2026-10-06T20:00:00.000Z",
+        );
+        expect(labelsOf(view.deletes)).toEqual(["msg-maintenance-form-now"]);
+      } else {
+        // Refused: nothing created, and the form stays to pick again.
+        expect(ScheduledMaintenanceService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(view.deletes).toEqual([]);
+      }
+      expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+    },
+  );
+
+  test("a submit that picks a label deleted since the form was sent: the real reference check refuses it, and the one '❌' reply says so in fixed words; nothing is created, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    stubMaintenanceCreate();
+    // The reference check itself runs; only the records it reads are stubbed.
+    jest
+      .spyOn(
+        WorkspaceProjectReferenceValidator,
+        "validateReferencesBelongToProject",
+      )
+      .mockRestore();
+    // The label is gone: the check finds no record for it.
+    jest.spyOn(LabelService, "findBy").mockResolvedValue([]);
+    const deletedLabelId: string = ObjectID.generate().toString();
+    const day: string = moment
+      .tz(SENDER_TIMEZONE)
+      .add(7, "days")
+      .format("YYYY-MM-DD");
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildCardSubmitActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("submit-maintenance-deleted-label"),
+        replyToId: "msg-maintenance-form-deleted-label",
+        value: maintenanceFormValue({
+          day: day,
+          timezone: SENDER_TIMEZONE,
+          picked: { labels: deletedLabelId },
+        }),
+      }),
+    );
+
+    expect(
+      deliveries.map((delivery: DeliveryRecord) => {
+        return delivery.httpStatus;
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(
+      deliveries[0]!.calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.method, call.label, call.connectorStatus];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      [
+        "POST",
+        `❌ Could not create the scheduled maintenance event: ${MICROSOFT_TEAMS_UNAVAILABLE_REFERENCE_MESSAGE}`,
+        200,
+      ],
+    ]);
+    expect(ScheduledMaintenanceService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    const reason: string = `This scheduled maintenance event references records that do not exist: Label "${deletedLabelId}". Please pick values that exist in this project and try again.`;
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      `Could not create a scheduled maintenance event from Microsoft Teams: ProjectScopedReferenceException: ${reason}`,
+      `Error: ${reason}`,
+    ]);
+    expect(loggedErrorCalls[1]?.message).toBeInstanceOf(
+      ProjectScopedReferenceException,
+    );
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  test("OneUptime refuses the create for a reason written for the user (the project has no scheduled state): the one '❌' reply gives that reason, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    stubMaintenanceCreate();
+    // What ScheduledMaintenanceService.onBeforeCreate throws in that case.
+    const refusal: BadDataException = new BadDataException(
+      "Scheduled state not found for this project. Please add an scheduled event state from settings.",
+    );
+    jest
+      .spyOn(ScheduledMaintenanceService, "create")
+      .mockRejectedValue(refusal);
+    const day: string = moment
+      .tz(SENDER_TIMEZONE)
+      .add(7, "days")
+      .format("YYYY-MM-DD");
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildCardSubmitActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("submit-maintenance-refused"),
+          replyToId: "msg-maintenance-form-refused",
+          value: maintenanceFormValue({ day: day, timezone: SENDER_TIMEZONE }),
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+      `❌ Could not create the scheduled maintenance event: ${refusal.message}`,
+    ]);
+    expect(view.deletes).toEqual([]);
+    // The class it was refused as, from the constructor: its name is Error's.
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      `Could not create a scheduled maintenance event from Microsoft Teams: BadDataException: ${refusal.message}`,
+      `Error: ${refusal.message}`,
+    ]);
+    expectFailureLogged({
+      at: 0,
+      line: loggedErrors[0]!,
+      error: refusal,
+      attributes: { projectId: projectId.toString() },
+    });
+  });
+
+  test("the create fails unexpectedly: the one '❌' reply says to try again or create it in OneUptime, with the link, HTTP 200", async () => {
+    stubMaintenanceCreate();
+    const databaseFailure: Error = new Error("simulated database failure");
+    jest
+      .spyOn(ScheduledMaintenanceService, "create")
+      .mockRejectedValue(databaseFailure);
+    const day: string = moment
+      .tz(SENDER_TIMEZONE)
+      .add(7, "days")
+      .format("YYYY-MM-DD");
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildCardSubmitActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("submit-maintenance-create-fails"),
+          replyToId: "msg-maintenance-form-fails",
+          value: maintenanceFormValue({ day: day, timezone: SENDER_TIMEZONE }),
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+      `❌ Could not create the scheduled maintenance event because of an unexpected error. Please try again, or create it in OneUptime: ${dashboardLink("/scheduled-maintenance-events/create")}`,
+    ]);
+    expect(view.deletes).toEqual([]);
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      "Could not create a scheduled maintenance event from Microsoft Teams: Error: simulated database failure",
+      "Error: simulated database failure",
+    ]);
+    expectFailureLogged({
+      at: 0,
+      line: loggedErrors[0]!,
+      error: databaseFailure,
+      attributes: { projectId: projectId.toString() },
+    });
+  });
+
+  test("a member whose role may not create scheduled maintenance (a read-only Viewer) is refused by the real permission check: one reply that says why, nothing created (unlike an incident, see the incident submit tests)", async () => {
+    stubMaintenanceCreate();
+    useRealMembershipCheck([Permission.Viewer]);
+    const day: string = moment
+      .tz(SENDER_TIMEZONE)
+      .add(7, "days")
+      .format("YYYY-MM-DD");
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildCardSubmitActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("submit-maintenance-viewer"),
+          replyToId: "msg-maintenance-form-viewer",
+          value: maintenanceFormValue({ day: day, timezone: SENDER_TIMEZONE }),
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect(view.httpStatuses).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(labelsOf(view.bubbles)).toEqual([
+      "You do not have permission to create a scheduled maintenance event. You do not have permissions to create Scheduled Maintenance Event. You need one of these permissions: Project Owner, Project Admin, Project Member, Scheduled Maintenance Admin, Scheduled Maintenance Member, Create Scheduled Maintenance",
+    ]);
+    expect(WorkspaceActionAuthorization.assertCanCreate).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(
+      1,
+    );
+    expect(ScheduledMaintenanceService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(view.deletes).toEqual([]);
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([]);
+  });
+});
+
+describe("a form action that happened is never reported as failed (#4111 review): when Teams refuses its confirmation, that refused reply is the only one, the form is removed, HTTP 200", () => {
+  const RECORD_ID: string = ObjectID.generate().toString();
+  const ON_CALL_POLICY_ID: string = ObjectID.generate().toString();
+  const STATE_ID: string = ObjectID.generate().toString();
+  const NOTE: string =
+    "Rolled back the 14:02 deploy; the error rate is normal.";
+
+  // A stubbed write, as the test checks it: done once.
+  type StubbedWrite = { mock: { calls: Array<Array<unknown>> } };
+
+  // A type, not an interface: test.each wants a Record<string, unknown> row.
+  type DoneActionCase = {
+    name: string;
+    action: string;
+    // The record the form acts on; a maintenance form carries it in `fields`.
+    actionValue: string;
+    fields: JSONObject;
+    confirmation: string;
+    stubWrite: () => StubbedWrite;
+  };
+
+  function stubExecutePolicy(): StubbedWrite {
+    return jest
+      .spyOn(OnCallDutyPolicyService, "executePolicy")
+      .mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+  }
+
+  // The event a maintenance form acts on, read before the action.
+  function stubExistingMaintenance(): void {
+    const maintenance: ScheduledMaintenance = new ScheduledMaintenance();
+    maintenance.id = new ObjectID(RECORD_ID);
+    maintenance.projectId = projectId;
+    maintenance.title = "Database upgrade";
+    jest
+      .spyOn(ScheduledMaintenanceService, "findOneBy")
+      .mockResolvedValue(maintenance);
+  }
+
+  /*
+   * Every form submit that confirms with a reply and then removes its form,
+   * but the two create forms (whose confirmation the submit tests above
+   * refuse): one row per handler in Actions/.
+   */
+  test.each<DoneActionCase>([
+    {
+      name: "incident: Add Note",
+      action: MicrosoftTeamsIncidentActionType.SubmitIncidentNote,
+      actionValue: RECORD_ID,
+      fields: { noteType: "public", note: NOTE },
+      confirmation: "✅ Note added successfully.",
+      stubWrite: (): StubbedWrite => {
+        return jest
+          .spyOn(IncidentPublicNoteService, "addNote")
+          .mockResolvedValue(new IncidentPublicNote());
+      },
+    },
+    {
+      name: "incident: Execute On-Call Policy",
+      action:
+        MicrosoftTeamsIncidentActionType.SubmitExecuteIncidentOnCallPolicy,
+      actionValue: RECORD_ID,
+      fields: { onCallPolicy: ON_CALL_POLICY_ID },
+      confirmation: "✅ On-call policy executed successfully.",
+      stubWrite: stubExecutePolicy,
+    },
+    {
+      name: "incident: Change Incident State",
+      action: MicrosoftTeamsIncidentActionType.SubmitChangeIncidentState,
+      actionValue: RECORD_ID,
+      fields: { incidentState: STATE_ID },
+      confirmation: "✅ Incident state changed successfully.",
+      stubWrite: (): StubbedWrite => {
+        return jest
+          .spyOn(IncidentService, "updateOneById")
+          .mockResolvedValue(1);
+      },
+    },
+    {
+      name: "alert: Add Note",
+      action: MicrosoftTeamsAlertActionType.SubmitAlertNote,
+      actionValue: RECORD_ID,
+      fields: { note: NOTE },
+      confirmation: "✅ Note added successfully.",
+      stubWrite: (): StubbedWrite => {
+        return jest
+          .spyOn(AlertInternalNoteService, "addNote")
+          .mockResolvedValue(new AlertInternalNote());
+      },
+    },
+    {
+      name: "alert: Execute On-Call Policy",
+      action: MicrosoftTeamsAlertActionType.SubmitExecuteAlertOnCallPolicy,
+      actionValue: RECORD_ID,
+      fields: { onCallPolicy: ON_CALL_POLICY_ID },
+      confirmation: "✅ On-call policy executed successfully.",
+      stubWrite: stubExecutePolicy,
+    },
+    {
+      name: "alert: Change Alert State",
+      action: MicrosoftTeamsAlertActionType.SubmitChangeAlertState,
+      actionValue: RECORD_ID,
+      fields: { alertState: STATE_ID },
+      confirmation: "✅ Alert state changed successfully.",
+      stubWrite: (): StubbedWrite => {
+        return jest.spyOn(AlertService, "updateOneById").mockResolvedValue(1);
+      },
+    },
+    {
+      name: "alert episode: Add Note",
+      action: MicrosoftTeamsAlertEpisodeActionType.SubmitAlertEpisodeNote,
+      actionValue: RECORD_ID,
+      fields: { note: NOTE },
+      confirmation: "✅ Note added successfully.",
+      stubWrite: (): StubbedWrite => {
+        return jest
+          .spyOn(AlertEpisodeInternalNoteService, "addNote")
+          .mockResolvedValue(new AlertEpisodeInternalNote());
+      },
+    },
+    {
+      name: "alert episode: Execute On-Call Policy",
+      action:
+        MicrosoftTeamsAlertEpisodeActionType.SubmitExecuteAlertEpisodeOnCallPolicy,
+      actionValue: RECORD_ID,
+      fields: { onCallPolicy: ON_CALL_POLICY_ID },
+      confirmation: "✅ On-call policy executed successfully.",
+      stubWrite: stubExecutePolicy,
+    },
+    {
+      name: "alert episode: Change Episode State",
+      action:
+        MicrosoftTeamsAlertEpisodeActionType.SubmitChangeAlertEpisodeState,
+      actionValue: RECORD_ID,
+      fields: { alertState: STATE_ID },
+      confirmation: "✅ Alert episode state changed successfully.",
+      stubWrite: (): StubbedWrite => {
+        return jest
+          .spyOn(AlertEpisodeService, "changeEpisodeState")
+          .mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+      },
+    },
+    {
+      name: "incident episode: Add Note",
+      action: MicrosoftTeamsIncidentEpisodeActionType.SubmitIncidentEpisodeNote,
+      actionValue: RECORD_ID,
+      fields: { note: NOTE },
+      confirmation: "Note added successfully.",
+      stubWrite: (): StubbedWrite => {
+        return jest
+          .spyOn(IncidentEpisodeInternalNoteService, "addNote")
+          .mockResolvedValue(new IncidentEpisodeInternalNote());
+      },
+    },
+    {
+      name: "incident episode: Execute On-Call Policy",
+      action:
+        MicrosoftTeamsIncidentEpisodeActionType.SubmitExecuteIncidentEpisodeOnCallPolicy,
+      actionValue: RECORD_ID,
+      fields: { onCallPolicy: ON_CALL_POLICY_ID },
+      confirmation: "On-call policy executed successfully.",
+      stubWrite: stubExecutePolicy,
+    },
+    {
+      name: "incident episode: Change Episode State",
+      action:
+        MicrosoftTeamsIncidentEpisodeActionType.SubmitChangeIncidentEpisodeState,
+      actionValue: RECORD_ID,
+      fields: { incidentState: STATE_ID },
+      confirmation: "Incident episode state changed successfully.",
+      stubWrite: (): StubbedWrite => {
+        return jest
+          .spyOn(IncidentEpisodeService, "changeEpisodeState")
+          .mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+      },
+    },
+    {
+      name: "scheduled maintenance: Add Note",
+      action:
+        MicrosoftTeamsScheduledMaintenanceActionType.SubmitScheduledMaintenanceNote,
+      actionValue: "",
+      fields: { scheduledMaintenanceId: RECORD_ID, note: NOTE, isPublic: true },
+      confirmation: "Note added successfully",
+      stubWrite: (): StubbedWrite => {
+        stubExistingMaintenance();
+        return jest
+          .spyOn(ScheduledMaintenancePublicNoteService, "addNote")
+          .mockResolvedValue(new ScheduledMaintenancePublicNote());
+      },
+    },
+    {
+      name: "scheduled maintenance: Change State",
+      action:
+        MicrosoftTeamsScheduledMaintenanceActionType.SubmitChangeScheduledMaintenanceState,
+      actionValue: "",
+      fields: { scheduledMaintenanceId: RECORD_ID, stateId: STATE_ID },
+      confirmation: "ScheduledMaintenance state changed successfully",
+      stubWrite: (): StubbedWrite => {
+        stubExistingMaintenance();
+        return jest
+          .spyOn(ScheduledMaintenanceService, "updateOneById")
+          .mockResolvedValue(1);
+      },
+    },
+  ])("$name", async (done: DoneActionCase) => {
+    const write: StubbedWrite = done.stubWrite();
+    // Teams refuses the confirmation, and nothing else.
+    connector.refuse = (request: ConnectorRequest): ConnectorAnswer | null => {
+      return request.method === "POST" &&
+        request.activity?.["text"] === done.confirmation
+        ? MESSAGE_REFUSED_ANSWER
+        : null;
+    };
+    const formId: string = `msg-form-${nextActivityId("done-action")}`;
+
+    const deliveries: Array<DeliveryRecord> = await deliverLikeTeams(
+      buildCardSubmitActivity({
+        id: nextActivityId("done-action-submit"),
+        replyToId: formId,
+        value: {
+          action: done.action,
+          actionValue: done.actionValue,
+          ...done.fields,
+        },
+      }),
+    );
+
+    /*
+     * Before: the refusal escaped into "Sorry, that action failed. Please try
+     * again later." (for maintenance, "An error occurred while processing the
+     * action") under an action that had happened, and the form stayed to be
+     * submitted again: a second note, a second page of the on-call policy.
+     */
+    expect(
+      deliveries.map((delivery: DeliveryRecord) => {
+        return delivery.httpStatus;
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([200]);
+    expect(
+      deliveries[0]!.calls.map((call: ConnectorCall) => {
+        return [call.method, call.label, call.connectorStatus];
+      }),
+    ).toEqual([
+      ["POST", done.confirmation, 403],
+      ["DELETE", formId, 200],
+    ]);
+    expect(write.mock.calls).toHaveLength(1);
+    // The operator can see why the user got no confirmation.
+    expect(loggedErrors).toEqual([
+      "Could not send a Microsoft Teams reply: RestError 403 Forbidden: The message was refused.",
+    ]);
+    expect(outerConsoleErrorCalls).toEqual([]);
+  });
+});
+
+describe("card size sweep: whatever the project, the form Teams gets fits the 40 KiB card budget", () => {
+  const MONITOR_COUNTS: Array<number> = [
+    0, 1, 50, 150, 200, 249, 250, 251, 400, 800, 1000, 2000, 5000,
+  ];
+
+  interface SweepShape {
+    description: string;
+    shape: Omit<ProjectShape, "monitors">;
+  }
+
+  const SHAPES: Array<SweepShape> = [
+    {
+      description: "30-character names, 20 labels, 10 on-call policies",
+      shape: {},
+    },
+    {
+      description:
+        "100-character names, 150 labels, 120 on-call policies (both over what is read)",
+      shape: { longNames: true, labels: 150, onCallPolicies: 120 },
+    },
+    {
+      description:
+        "100-character names and every list at the most that is read, 50 severities and 50 monitor statuses included",
+      shape: {
+        longNames: true,
+        labels: 100,
+        onCallPolicies: 100,
+        severities: 50,
+        monitorStatuses: 50,
+      },
+    },
+  ];
+
+  interface SweepCommand {
+    text: string;
+    heading: string;
+    monitorsChoiceSetId: string;
+    addLaterHint: string;
+    createRoute: string;
+    hasOnCallPolicies: boolean;
+  }
+
+  const COMMANDS: Array<SweepCommand> = [
+    {
+      text: "create incident",
+      heading: "Create New Incident",
+      monitorsChoiceSetId: "incidentMonitors",
+      addLaterHint: INCIDENT_ADD_LATER_HINT,
+      createRoute: "/incidents/create",
+      hasOnCallPolicies: true,
+    },
+    {
+      text: "create maintenance",
+      heading: "Create New Scheduled Maintenance",
+      monitorsChoiceSetId: "scheduledMaintenanceMonitors",
+      addLaterHint: MAINTENANCE_ADD_LATER_HINT,
+      createRoute: "/scheduled-maintenance-events/create",
+      hasOnCallPolicies: false,
+    },
+  ];
+
+  // One delivery of the sweep: the form is accepted at once and fits.
+  async function expectFormFits(data: {
+    command: SweepCommand;
+    shape: ProjectShape;
+  }): Promise<void> {
+    const project: ProjectData = stubProjectData(data.shape);
+    const description: string = `${data.command.text} with ${data.shape.monitors} monitors`;
+
+    const view: TeamsView = viewOf(
+      await deliverLikeTeams(
+        buildMessageActivity({
+          id: nextActivityId("sweep"),
+          text: data.command.text,
+        }),
+      ),
+    );
+
+    expect({ description, httpStatuses: view.httpStatuses }).toEqual({
+      description,
+      httpStatuses: [200],
+    });
+    // Accepted the first time at the documented limit: no 413 at all.
+    expect({ description, refused: view.refused.length }).toEqual({
+      description,
+      refused: 0,
+    });
+    expect({ description, bubbles: labelsOf(view.bubbles) }).toEqual({
+      description,
+      bubbles: [data.command.heading],
+    });
+
+    const form: ConnectorCall = view.bubbles[0]!;
+    expect(form.cardUtf16Bytes).toBeLessThanOrEqual(CARD_BUDGET_IN_UTF16_BYTES);
+
+    const card: JSONObject = cardOf(form);
+    const shownCounts: Array<{ shown: number; total: number }> = [];
+    const lists: Array<CardListExpectation> = [
+      {
+        choiceSetId: data.command.monitorsChoiceSetId,
+        pluralNoun: "monitors",
+        addLaterHint: data.command.addLaterHint,
+        rows: project.monitors,
+      },
+      {
+        choiceSetId: "labels",
+        pluralNoun: "labels",
+        addLaterHint: data.command.addLaterHint,
+        rows: project.labels,
+      },
+    ];
+    if (data.command.hasOnCallPolicies) {
+      lists.push({
+        choiceSetId: "onCallDutyPolicies",
+        pluralNoun: "on-call policies",
+        addLaterHint: data.command.addLaterHint,
+        rows: project.onCallPolicies,
+      });
+    }
+
+    for (const list of lists) {
+      shownCounts.push({
+        shown: expectListAccountedFor(card, list),
+        total: list.rows.length,
+      });
+    }
+
+    const shownMonitors: number = shownCounts[0]!.shown;
+    expect(shownMonitors).toBeLessThanOrEqual(
+      MICROSOFT_TEAMS_MAX_MONITOR_CHOICES,
+    );
+    // Monitor statuses are offered only alongside monitors.
+    expect(getElement(card, "monitorStatus") !== undefined).toBe(
+      shownMonitors > 0,
+    );
+
+    // "Create in OneUptime" exactly when something was left off.
+    const isAnythingLeftOff: boolean = shownCounts.some(
+      (count: { shown: number; total: number }) => {
+        return count.shown < count.total;
+      },
+    );
+    expect(getCreateInOneUptimeActions(card)).toEqual(
+      isAnythingLeftOff
+        ? [
+            {
+              type: "Action.OpenUrl",
+              title: "Create in OneUptime",
+              url: dashboardLink(data.command.createRoute),
+            },
+          ]
+        : [],
+    );
+  }
+
+  for (const command of COMMANDS) {
+    for (const sweepShape of SHAPES) {
+      test(`'${command.text}', ${sweepShape.description}: 0 to 5000 monitors`, async () => {
+        for (const monitorCount of MONITOR_COUNTS) {
+          await expectFormFits({
+            command: command,
+            shape: { ...sweepShape.shape, monitors: monitorCount },
+          });
+        }
+      });
+    }
+  }
+});