@oneuptime/common 12.0.7 → 12.0.9

package/build/dist/Server/Services/UserNotificationRuleService.js

@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ var __metadata = (this && this.__metadata) || function (k, v) {
     if (typeof Reflect === "object" && typeof Reflect.metadata === "function") return Reflect.metadata(k, v);
 };
 import DatabaseConfig from "../DatabaseConfig";
+import DatabaseRequestType from "../Types/BaseDatabase/DatabaseRequestType";
+import TenantPermission from "../Types/Database/Permissions/TenantPermission";
 import Markdown, { MarkdownContentType } from "../Types/Markdown";
 import CallService from "./CallService";
 import DatabaseService from "./DatabaseService";
@@ -21,12 +23,23 @@ import TelegramService from "./TelegramService";
 import WebhookService from "./WebhookService";
 import WhatsAppService from "./WhatsAppService";
 import UserEmailService from "./UserEmailService";
+import UserCallService from "./UserCallService";
+import UserPushService from "./UserPushService";
+import UserSmsService from "./UserSmsService";
+import UserTelegramService from "./UserTelegramService";
+import UserWebhookService from "./UserWebhookService";
+import UserWhatsAppService from "./UserWhatsAppService";
+import ProjectService from "./ProjectService";
+import UserNotificationRuleAdminService from "./UserNotificationRuleAdminService";
+import OnCallReadinessService, { ReadinessMethodType, ReadinessStatus, ResponderSource, } from "./OnCallReadinessService";
 import UserOnCallLogService from "./UserOnCallLogService";
 import UserOnCallLogTimelineService from "./UserOnCallLogTimelineService";
 import { AppApiRoute } from "../../ServiceRoute";
 import Route from "../../Types/API/Route";
 import URL from "../../Types/API/URL";
-import { LIMIT_PER_PROJECT } from "../../Types/Database/LimitMax";
+import AuditLogAction from "../../Types/AuditLog/AuditLogAction";
+import SortOrder from "../../Types/BaseDatabase/SortOrder";
+import LIMIT_MAX, { LIMIT_PER_PROJECT } from "../../Types/Database/LimitMax";
 import QueryHelper from "../Types/Database/QueryHelper";
 import Email from "../../Types/Email";
 import EmailTemplateType from "../../Types/Email/EmailTemplateType";
@@ -49,19 +62,268 @@ import AlertSeverityService from "./AlertSeverityService";
 import AlertEpisode from "../../Models/DatabaseModels/AlertEpisode";
 import AlertEpisodeService from "./AlertEpisodeService";
 import AlertEpisodeMemberService from "./AlertEpisodeMemberService";
+import IncidentEpisode from "../../Models/DatabaseModels/IncidentEpisode";
 import IncidentEpisodeService from "./IncidentEpisodeService";
+import IncidentEpisodeMemberService from "./IncidentEpisodeMemberService";
 import WorkspaceNotificationRuleService from "./WorkspaceNotificationRuleService";
 import PushNotificationService from "./PushNotificationService";
 import NotificationRuleEventType from "../../Types/Workspace/NotificationRules/EventType";
 import PushNotificationUtil from "../Utils/PushNotificationUtil";
 import logger from "../Utils/Logger";
 import CaptureSpan from "../Utils/Telemetry/CaptureSpan";
+/*
+ * Why the fallback returns an outcome and not just a boolean.
+ *
+ * Its caller (UserOnCallLogService.onCreateSuccess) has to pick a
+ * UserNotificationExecutionStatus out of the answer, and
+ * UserNotificationExecutionStatus.Error is TERMINAL — ExecutePendingExecutions
+ * selects Executing and TimeoutStuckExecutions selects Started, so nothing
+ * anywhere re-selects an Error log. That makes the two ways of not notifying
+ * somebody opposites rather than synonyms: "this responder has nothing we can
+ * page them on" is a real, permanent misconfiguration worth burning the log
+ * for, while "the send raised" is a bad minute that a terminal status would
+ * turn into a permanently dropped page. Both are `notified: false`, so the
+ * difference has to survive the return or the caller cannot act on it.
+ */
+export var FallbackNotificationOutcome;
+(function (FallbackNotificationOutcome) {
+    /*
+     * A page was handed to at least one sender. Nothing below observes what the
+     * sender then did with it — every send in deliverNotificationForRule is
+     * fire-and-forget — so this means dispatched, not received.
+     */
+    FallbackNotificationOutcome["Delivered"] = "Delivered";
+    /*
+     * There was nothing to try. The responder has no verified method the
+     * fallback may use and no webhook, or the only paid channels they have are
+     * switched off at the project level. Permanent: a retry finds the same
+     * nothing, and only a human adding a notification method changes it.
+     */
+    FallbackNotificationOutcome["NoUsableNotificationMethod"] = "NoUsableNotificationMethod";
+    /*
+     * There was something to try and none of it went out: a send raised, or a
+     * chosen channel had no template for this event type, or another run already
+     * holds the fallback claim on this log and owns the outcome. All three are
+     * transient from the caller's point of view — none of them is evidence that
+     * the responder is unreachable, so none of them justifies a terminal status.
+     */
+    FallbackNotificationOutcome["DeliveryFailed"] = "DeliveryFailed";
+})(FallbackNotificationOutcome || (FallbackNotificationOutcome = {}));
+/*
+ * The fallback is not tied to any UserNotificationRule row — there is no rule,
+ * which is the whole reason it runs — so it claims the on-call log under this
+ * reserved literal instead of a rule id. `executedNotificationRules` is a jsonb
+ * map keyed by arbitrary text, so the literal sits beside real rule uuids and
+ * can never collide with one.
+ */
+export const FALLBACK_NOTIFICATION_CLAIM_KEY = "__fallback__";
+/*
+ * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ * DELETION IMPACT — "what would I lose by deleting this?", asked BEFORE the
+ * delete.
+ *
+ * Two writes a responder makes about their own configuration can take away the
+ * only thing standing between a page and nobody hearing it, and neither one
+ * looks like that from the screen it is made on:
+ *
+ *   - Deleting a RULE can remove the LAST rule covering one
+ *     (ruleType x severity) cell. The rule table is a list of rows, not a
+ *     coverage grid, so "this is the only thing left for Sev1 incidents" is
+ *     visible nowhere at the moment somebody clicks delete.
+ *
+ *   - Deleting a METHOD CASCADES. Every method foreign key on
+ *     UserNotificationRule is onDelete: "CASCADE" — and each method service
+ *     deletes the rows in its own onBeforeDelete as well, so the cascade
+ *     happens whether or not the database does it — which means removing one
+ *     phone number destroys every rule that pointed at it. The delete dialog
+ *     for a phone number mentions notification rules nowhere at all. This is
+ *     the more dangerous of the two by a distance, because the loss is not even
+ *     the thing being deleted.
+ *
+ * Everything here is ADVISORY and is deliberately shaped as a QUESTION the
+ * caller asks first, not as a hook that throws. The deletion still goes through
+ * the ordinary CRUD path afterwards and nothing below can stop it, for two
+ * reasons. The first is that this is the user's own configuration and they are
+ * entitled to it — turning "I do not want to be woken by Sev4 alerts" into
+ * something a human needs permission for is a worse product than the accident
+ * it prevents. The second is that a throwing hook would break the LEGITIMATE
+ * deletes too: a user leaving a project, an admin retiring a decommissioned
+ * number, a team cleaning up after a migration. The goal is not that nobody
+ * does this. It is that nobody does it by accident.
+ *
+ * "Is this person on call anywhere" is answered by OnCallReadinessService and
+ * is never re-derived here. A second answer to that question that disagreed
+ * with the readiness page would be worse than no answer: an admin who is told
+ * "you are not on call" by a delete dialog and "NotReachable on 3 policies" by
+ * the readiness table has no way to know which one to believe, and will end up
+ * believing the reassuring one.
+ * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ */
+/*
+ * The channel vocabulary is ReadinessMethodType, re-exported under the name the
+ * deletion API uses. Sharing one enum with readiness (which in turn shares its
+ * literals with the fallback's `channelsUsed`) means an operator reading
+ * "Telegram" in a delete warning, "Telegram" in the readiness table and
+ * "notified via fallback (Telegram)" in an execution log is reading the same
+ * word about the same thing. It is also what lets a notification-method service
+ * name its own channel without importing the readiness module.
+ */
+export { ReadinessMethodType as NotificationMethodChannel };
+/**
+ * Whether anything will still be able to page this user once the deletion has
+ * happened.
+ *
+ * Four values rather than a boolean because two of the four are things this
+ * preview knows FOR CERTAIN and two are not, and collapsing them would mean
+ * either inventing a false green or crying wolf at everybody.
+ *
+ * The certainty comes from one structural fact: a method must be verified to be
+ * used at all, and of the seven channels, Push, Email and Webhook have no
+ * project switch that can turn them off (see OnCallReadinessService.
+ * isChannelEnabled — the first two are zero-cost and the third is somebody
+ * else's endpoint). So "no verified method survives" is definitely unreachable,
+ * and "a verified Push/Email/Webhook survives" is definitely reachable. What is
+ * left over — a user whose surviving methods are all on the four paid channels
+ * — depends on project settings this preview does not read, and says so.
+ */
+export var PostDeletionReachability;
+(function (PostDeletionReachability) {
+    /** A verified method on a channel no project setting can disable survives. */
+    PostDeletionReachability["Reachable"] = "Reachable";
+    /**
+     * Verified methods survive, but every one of them is on a paid channel
+     * (SMS, Call, WhatsApp, Telegram) that the project can switch off. Whether
+     * this user can still be paged is a project setting, and the readiness page
+     * is the surface that knows.
+     */
+    PostDeletionReachability["DependsOnProjectSettings"] = "DependsOnProjectSettings";
+    /**
+     * Nothing verified survives. This deletion is the one that takes away the
+     * last way of reaching this person — no rule, and no fallback either, since
+     * the fallback needs a verified method too.
+     */
+    PostDeletionReachability["NotReachable"] = "NotReachable";
+    /**
+     * They could not be paged before this deletion either. Worth its own value
+     * rather than being folded into NotReachable: the sentence an admin needs is
+     * "this was already broken", not "you are about to break it".
+     */
+    PostDeletionReachability["AlreadyNotReachable"] = "AlreadyNotReachable";
+    /**
+     * Readiness had no answer — the user is not a member of this project, or has
+     * no User row. Never guessed at, because a guess here is exactly the false
+     * green this whole feature exists to prevent.
+     */
+    PostDeletionReachability["Unknown"] = "Unknown";
+})(PostDeletionReachability || (PostDeletionReachability = {}));
+var SeverityKind;
+(function (SeverityKind) {
+    SeverityKind["Incident"] = "Incident";
+    SeverityKind["Alert"] = "Alert";
+})(SeverityKind || (SeverityKind = {}));
+/*
+ * Which severity column scopes which rule type. This is the same table
+ * OnCallReadinessService keeps as RULE_TYPE_SCOPES and it has to stay in
+ * agreement with it: an alert rule matched against an incident severity id
+ * matches nothing at runtime, so a preview that paired them would report a cell
+ * as covered by a rule that can never fire — the exact shape of Gap G, where
+ * episode rules were written with a NULL severity and were unreachable and
+ * invisible at the same time. The severity is always taken from the column the
+ * RULE TYPE dictates, never from whichever one happens to be populated.
+ */
+const PAGING_RULE_TYPE_SCOPES = [
+    {
+        ruleType: NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT,
+        severityKind: SeverityKind.Incident,
+        severityColumn: "incidentSeverityId",
+        subjectNoun: "incidents",
+    },
+    {
+        ruleType: NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT_EPISODE,
+        severityKind: SeverityKind.Incident,
+        severityColumn: "incidentSeverityId",
+        subjectNoun: "incident episodes",
+    },
+    {
+        ruleType: NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_ALERT,
+        severityKind: SeverityKind.Alert,
+        severityColumn: "alertSeverityId",
+        subjectNoun: "alerts",
+    },
+    {
+        ruleType: NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_ALERT_EPISODE,
+        severityKind: SeverityKind.Alert,
+        severityColumn: "alertSeverityId",
+        subjectNoun: "alert episodes",
+    },
+];
+/*
+ * The two rule types that are about the user's shift rather than about anything
+ * that fired. They carry no severity, so they are one cell each.
+ */
+const HANDOFF_RULE_TYPES = [
+    NotificationRuleType.WHEN_USER_GOES_ON_CALL,
+    NotificationRuleType.WHEN_USER_GOES_OFF_CALL,
+];
+/**
+ * The three channels no project setting can switch off. Push and Email are
+ * zero-cost and Webhook is somebody else's endpoint, so nothing gates them —
+ * which is what makes "a verified one of these survives" a CERTAIN answer to
+ * "can this person still be paged" rather than a hopeful one. Kept in step with
+ * OnCallReadinessService.isChannelEnabled, which returns true for exactly these
+ * three unconditionally.
+ *
+ * A FUNCTION rather than a module-level constant, and that is load-bearing
+ * rather than stylistic: this module and OnCallReadinessService import each
+ * other, so whichever one is loaded second sees the other's exports still
+ * empty. Reading ReadinessMethodType while this module is being evaluated
+ * therefore throws on ONE of the two load orders and not the other — a crash
+ * that depends on which file some unrelated caller happened to import first,
+ * which is about the worst possible failure to debug. Read on call, both orders
+ * are long since settled. The same rule applies to every enum below that comes
+ * from OnCallReadinessService.
+ */
+const channelsWithNoProjectSwitch = () => {
+    return [
+        ReadinessMethodType.Push,
+        ReadinessMethodType.Email,
+        ReadinessMethodType.Webhook,
+    ];
+};
+/**
+ * How each responder source reads in a sentence. The enum values are single
+ * words chosen for a chip; a warning has room to say what they mean, and
+ * "Override" on its own tells a user nothing about why they are on call.
+ *
+ * The map is built inside the call for the module-evaluation reason above —
+ * a computed key is read at definition time, so a module-level Record would
+ * carry exactly the same load-order crash. Typed as a full Record so that a new
+ * ResponderSource fails to compile here rather than rendering as a blank.
+ */
+const responderSourceProse = (source) => {
+    const prose = {
+        [ResponderSource.Direct]: "directly on an escalation rule",
+        [ResponderSource.Team]: "through a team",
+        [ResponderSource.Schedule]: "through a schedule",
+        [ResponderSource.Override]: "through an override",
+    };
+    return prose[source];
+};
+/*
+ * Rows per page for the rule read, and a ceiling on how many pages one preview
+ * may take. LIMIT_PER_PROJECT is the largest read the database layer will
+ * serve, so it is the biggest page that survives a round trip. One user's rules
+ * are bounded by (rule types x severities x methods) and land far below one
+ * page in any real project; the loop exists so that the one project where that
+ * is not true gets a truthful answer instead of a silently truncated one.
+ */
+const DELETION_IMPACT_PAGE_SIZE = LIMIT_PER_PROJECT;
+const MAX_DELETION_IMPACT_PAGES = 50;
 export class Service extends DatabaseService {
     constructor() {
         super(Model);
     }
     async executeNotificationRuleItem(userNotificationRuleId, options) {
-        var _a, _b, _c, _d, _e, _f, _g, _h, _j, _k, _l, _m, _o, _p, _q, _r, _s, _t, _u, _v, _w, _x, _y, _z, _0, _1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, _7, _8, _9, _10, _11, _12, _13, _14, _15, _16, _17, _18, _19, _20, _21, _22, _23, _24, _25, _26, _27, _28, _29, _30, _31, _32, _33, _34, _35, _36, _37, _38, _39, _40, _41, _42, _43, _44, _45, _46, _47, _48, _49;
         /*
          * Atomically claim this rule for this on-call log BEFORE sending, so two
          * overlapping cron runs cannot both mark the rule un-executed and both
@@ -83,36 +345,51 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             select: {
                 _id: true,
                 userId: true,
+                /*
+                 * Every method relation also selects its OWN userId, which none of the
+                 * channel blocks below read. It is here for the ownership check that
+                 * runs before delivery: the address a page is sent to comes from these
+                 * relations, while whose page it is comes from the rule's userId, and
+                 * nothing in the ORM ever compares the two. See
+                 * getNotificationMethodsNotOwnedByRuleOwner.
+                 */
                 userCall: {
                     phone: true,
                     isVerified: true,
+                    userId: true,
                 },
                 userSms: {
                     phone: true,
                     isVerified: true,
+                    userId: true,
                 },
                 userWhatsApp: {
                     phone: true,
                     isVerified: true,
+                    userId: true,
                 },
                 userTelegram: {
                     telegramChatId: true,
                     telegramUserHandle: true,
                     isVerified: true,
+                    userId: true,
                 },
                 userWebhook: {
                     webhookUrl: true,
                     name: true,
                     secret: true,
+                    userId: true,
                 },
                 userEmail: {
                     email: true,
                     isVerified: true,
+                    userId: true,
                 },
                 userPush: {
                     deviceToken: true,
                     deviceType: true,
                     isVerified: true,
+                    userId: true,
                 },
             },
             props: {
@@ -123,19 +400,121 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             throw new BadDataException("Notification rule item not found.");
         }
         /*
-         * If the project has a default Twilio config set, use it for all
-         * team-member SMS and Calls in this rule. Otherwise the global config
-         * is used by the notification service.
+         * The last line of defence, and the only one that survives every write path
+         * — including ones that do not exist yet.
+         *
+         * The write-side guards in UserNotificationRuleAdminService stop a rule
+         * whose ownership column and method relation name different people from
+         * being SAVED. This stops one that somehow exists from being ACTED ON: a
+         * row written before those guards landed, one written by internal code
+         * running as root, or one written through a path a future change forgets to
+         * route through them. Without it, a single bad row silently redirects a
+         * responder's pages for as long as nobody thinks to compare two columns
+         * that no screen shows side by side.
          */
-        const projectTwilioConfig = await ProjectCallSMSConfigService.getProjectDefaultTwilioConfig(options.projectId);
+        const mismatchedChannels = this.getNotificationMethodsNotOwnedByRuleOwner(notificationRuleItem);
+        if (mismatchedChannels.length > 0) {
+            await this.recordMismatchedNotificationMethod(notificationRuleItem, options, mismatchedChannels);
+            return;
+        }
+        await this.deliverNotificationForRule(notificationRuleItem, options);
+    }
+    /*
+     * Which of a rule's method relations are owned by somebody other than the
+     * rule itself.
+     *
+     * Only a method whose userId was actually LOADED and actually DISAGREES is
+     * reported. An unselected column arrives as `undefined`, and reading absence
+     * as disagreement would turn this guard into a page-dropping machine on every
+     * caller that does not select userId — precisely the failure this whole epic
+     * exists to eliminate. Silence here means "no evidence of a mismatch", which
+     * is the only safe default for a check that can suppress a page.
+     */
+    getNotificationMethodsNotOwnedByRuleOwner(notificationRuleItem) {
+        var _a, _b, _c, _d, _e, _f, _g;
+        const ruleOwnerUserId = notificationRuleItem.userId;
+        if (!ruleOwnerUserId) {
+            /*
+             * An unowned rule cannot be paged for anybody in the first place — the
+             * caller found it by id, not by owner — so there is no owner to compare
+             * against and nothing to report.
+             */
+            return [];
+        }
+        const methodOwners = [
+            { label: "Email", ownerUserId: (_a = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a.userId },
+            { label: "SMS", ownerUserId: (_b = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _b === void 0 ? void 0 : _b.userId },
+            { label: "Call", ownerUserId: (_c = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _c === void 0 ? void 0 : _c.userId },
+            {
+                label: "WhatsApp",
+                ownerUserId: (_d = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _d === void 0 ? void 0 : _d.userId,
+            },
+            {
+                label: "Telegram",
+                ownerUserId: (_e = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram) === null || _e === void 0 ? void 0 : _e.userId,
+            },
+            { label: "Push", ownerUserId: (_f = notificationRuleItem.userPush) === null || _f === void 0 ? void 0 : _f.userId },
+            {
+                label: "Webhook",
+                ownerUserId: (_g = notificationRuleItem.userWebhook) === null || _g === void 0 ? void 0 : _g.userId,
+            },
+        ];
+        const mismatched = [];
+        for (const methodOwner of methodOwners) {
+            if (methodOwner.ownerUserId &&
+                methodOwner.ownerUserId.toString() !== ruleOwnerUserId.toString()) {
+                mismatched.push(methodOwner.label);
+            }
+        }
+        return mismatched;
+    }
+    /*
+     * Refuse the whole rule, not merely the offending channel.
+     *
+     * A rule with a foreign method on it is not a rule with one bad field; it is
+     * a row somebody wrote to redirect a page, and delivering its other channels
+     * would let the row keep working well enough to escape notice. The timeline
+     * row is the point: it is the surface a responder and an operator both read,
+     * and it names the channel so the mismatch can be found and repaired rather
+     * than merely felt as a page that never arrived.
+     */
+    async recordMismatchedNotificationMethod(notificationRuleItem, options, mismatchedChannels) {
+        var _a, _b;
+        logger.error(`Notification rule ${(_a = notificationRuleItem.id) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a.toString()} was not executed: its ${mismatchedChannels.join(", ")} notification method does not belong to the user the rule belongs to (${(_b = notificationRuleItem.userId) === null || _b === void 0 ? void 0 : _b.toString()}).`);
+        const logTimelineItem = this.buildLogTimelineItem(notificationRuleItem, options);
+        logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Error;
+        logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Notification not sent because the ${mismatchedChannels.join(", ")} notification method on this rule belongs to a different user. Please review this notification rule.`;
+        await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
+            data: logTimelineItem,
+            props: {
+                isRoot: true,
+            },
+        });
+    }
+    /*
+     * Build the timeline row every channel block stamps its status onto.
+     *
+     * Callers keep ONE instance and mutate it, because after the first create()
+     * the instance carries an _id and a second create() with it UPDATEs the row
+     * it already wrote instead of inserting a new one. Anything that needs a row
+     * genuinely independent of the delivery attempts (the fell-through guard
+     * below) must therefore call this again for a fresh instance rather than
+     * reuse the one the channel blocks have been writing to.
+     */
+    buildLogTimelineItem(notificationRuleItem, options) {
         const logTimelineItem = new UserOnCallLogTimeline();
         logTimelineItem.projectId = options.projectId;
         logTimelineItem.userNotificationLogId = options.userNotificationLogId;
-        logTimelineItem.userNotificationRuleId = userNotificationRuleId;
-        logTimelineItem.userNotificationLogId = options.userNotificationLogId;
         logTimelineItem.userId = notificationRuleItem.userId;
         logTimelineItem.userNotificationEventType =
             options.userNotificationEventType;
+        /*
+         * The fallback delivers through rules it builds in memory and never saves,
+         * so there is not always a rule id to point the row at.
+         */
+        if (notificationRuleItem.id) {
+            logTimelineItem.userNotificationRuleId = notificationRuleItem.id;
+        }
         if (options.userBelongsToTeamId) {
             logTimelineItem.userBelongsToTeamId = options.userBelongsToTeamId;
         }
@@ -168,6 +547,43 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             logTimelineItem.onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineId =
                 options.onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineId;
         }
+        return logTimelineItem;
+    }
+    /*
+     * The delivery half of executeNotificationRuleItem: given a rule that is
+     * already loaded with its method relations, decide what to send on which
+     * channel and hand it to the senders.
+     *
+     * It is split out from the public method so executeFallbackNotification can
+     * reuse it with a rule it assembled in memory and never persisted. The claim
+     * and the rule lookup that the public method does first are meaningless for a
+     * rule that does not exist in the database; everything from here down is
+     * exactly what the fallback needs.
+     *
+     * Returns whether a page was actually handed to a sender, which the fallback
+     * needs and the normal path ignores. Resolving without throwing is NOT the
+     * same as having sent something: a rule whose channel has no block for this
+     * event type falls all the way through to the guard at the bottom, writes an
+     * Error row and sends nothing. A caller that read "did not throw" as "paged"
+     * would name a channel the responder never heard from.
+     */
+    async deliverNotificationForRule(notificationRuleItem, options) {
+        var _a, _b, _c, _d, _e, _f, _g, _h, _j, _k, _l, _m, _o, _p, _q, _r, _s, _t, _u, _v, _w, _x, _y, _z, _0, _1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, _7, _8, _9, _10, _11, _12, _13, _14, _15, _16, _17, _18, _19, _20, _21, _22, _23, _24, _25, _26, _27, _28, _29, _30, _31, _32, _33, _34, _35, _36, _37, _38, _39, _40, _41, _42, _43, _44, _45, _46, _47, _48, _49, _50, _51, _52, _53, _54, _55;
+        /*
+         * If the project has a default Twilio config set, use it for all
+         * team-member SMS and Calls in this rule. Otherwise the global config
+         * is used by the notification service.
+         */
+        const projectTwilioConfig = await ProjectCallSMSConfigService.getProjectDefaultTwilioConfig(options.projectId);
+        const logTimelineItem = this.buildLogTimelineItem(notificationRuleItem, options);
+        /*
+         * Which channels this rule could actually deliver on, and whether any block
+         * below matched the event type. If a channel is contactable but no branch
+         * claimed the event, the page vanishes without a trace — the guard at the
+         * end of this method turns that into a visible Error row.
+         */
+        const contactableChannels = this.getContactableChannelNames(notificationRuleItem);
+        let deliveryAttempted = false;
         // add status and status message and save.
         let incident = null;
         let alert = null;
@@ -294,6 +710,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                 UserNotificationEventType.AlertCreated &&
                 alert) {
                 // create an error log.
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
                 logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending email to ${(_c = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _c === void 0 ? void 0 : _c.email.toString()}`;
                 logTimelineItem.userEmailId = notificationRuleItem.userEmail.id;
@@ -333,6 +750,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                 UserNotificationEventType.IncidentCreated &&
                 incident) {
                 // create an error log.
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
                 logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending email to ${(_e = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _e === void 0 ? void 0 : _e.email.toString()}`;
                 logTimelineItem.userEmailId = notificationRuleItem.userEmail.id;
@@ -371,6 +789,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.AlertEpisodeCreated &&
                 alertEpisode) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
                 logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending email to ${(_g = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _g === void 0 ? void 0 : _g.email.toString()}`;
                 logTimelineItem.userEmailId = notificationRuleItem.userEmail.id;
@@ -404,13 +823,55 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                     });
                 });
             }
+            // send email for incident episode
+            if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
+                UserNotificationEventType.IncidentEpisodeCreated &&
+                incidentEpisode) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
+                logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending email to ${(_j = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _j === void 0 ? void 0 : _j.email.toString()}`;
+                logTimelineItem.userEmailId = notificationRuleItem.userEmail.id;
+                const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
+                    data: logTimelineItem,
+                    props: {
+                        isRoot: true,
+                    },
+                });
+                const emailMessage = await this.generateEmailTemplateForIncidentEpisodeCreated((_k = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _k === void 0 ? void 0 : _k.email, incidentEpisode, updatedLog.id);
+                /*
+                 * No incidentEpisodeId is passed: MailService.sendMail accepts the key
+                 * in its options type but never serialises it onto the request body, so
+                 * passing it would look like a link that does not exist.
+                 */
+                MailService.sendMail(emailMessage, {
+                    userOnCallLogTimelineId: updatedLog.id,
+                    projectId: options.projectId,
+                    userId: notificationRuleItem.userId,
+                    onCallPolicyId: options.onCallPolicyId,
+                    onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId: options.onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId,
+                    teamId: options.userBelongsToTeamId,
+                    onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineId: options.onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineId,
+                    onCallScheduleId: options.onCallScheduleId,
+                }).catch(async (err) => {
+                    await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.updateOneById({
+                        id: updatedLog.id,
+                        data: {
+                            status: UserNotificationStatus.Error,
+                            statusMessage: err.message || "Error sending email.",
+                        },
+                        props: {
+                            isRoot: true,
+                        },
+                    });
+                });
+            }
         }
         // if you have an email but is not verified, then create a log.
-        if (((_j = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _j === void 0 ? void 0 : _j.email) &&
-            !((_k = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _k === void 0 ? void 0 : _k.isVerified)) {
+        if (((_l = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _l === void 0 ? void 0 : _l.email) &&
+            !((_m = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _m === void 0 ? void 0 : _m.isVerified)) {
             // create an error log.
             logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Error;
-            logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Email notification not sent because email ${(_l = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _l === void 0 ? void 0 : _l.email.toString()} is not verified.`;
+            logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Email notification not sent because email ${(_o = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _o === void 0 ? void 0 : _o.email.toString()} is not verified.`;
             await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
                 data: logTimelineItem,
                 props: {
@@ -419,15 +880,16 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             });
         }
         // send sms.
-        if (((_m = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _m === void 0 ? void 0 : _m.phone) &&
-            ((_o = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _o === void 0 ? void 0 : _o.isVerified)) {
+        if (((_p = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _p === void 0 ? void 0 : _p.phone) &&
+            ((_q = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _q === void 0 ? void 0 : _q.isVerified)) {
             //send sms for alert
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.AlertCreated &&
                 alert) {
                 // create an error log.
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
-                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending SMS to ${(_p = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _p === void 0 ? void 0 : _p.phone.toString()}.`;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending SMS to ${(_r = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _r === void 0 ? void 0 : _r.phone.toString()}.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userSmsId = notificationRuleItem.userSms.id;
                 const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
                     data: logTimelineItem,
@@ -466,8 +928,9 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                 UserNotificationEventType.IncidentCreated &&
                 incident) {
                 // create an error log.
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
-                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending SMS to ${(_q = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _q === void 0 ? void 0 : _q.phone.toString()}.`;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending SMS to ${(_s = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _s === void 0 ? void 0 : _s.phone.toString()}.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userSmsId = notificationRuleItem.userSms.id;
                 const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
                     data: logTimelineItem,
@@ -505,8 +968,9 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.AlertEpisodeCreated &&
                 alertEpisode) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
-                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending SMS to ${(_r = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _r === void 0 ? void 0 : _r.phone.toString()}.`;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending SMS to ${(_t = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _t === void 0 ? void 0 : _t.phone.toString()}.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userSmsId = notificationRuleItem.userSms.id;
                 const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
                     data: logTimelineItem,
@@ -539,12 +1003,54 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                     });
                 });
             }
+            // send sms for incident episode
+            if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
+                UserNotificationEventType.IncidentEpisodeCreated &&
+                incidentEpisode) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
+                logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending SMS to ${(_u = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _u === void 0 ? void 0 : _u.phone.toString()}.`;
+                logTimelineItem.userSmsId = notificationRuleItem.userSms.id;
+                const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
+                    data: logTimelineItem,
+                    props: {
+                        isRoot: true,
+                    },
+                });
+                const smsMessage = await this.generateSmsTemplateForIncidentEpisodeCreated(notificationRuleItem.userSms.phone, incidentEpisode, updatedLog.id);
+                /*
+                 * SmsService accepts incidentEpisodeId but drops it on the floor when
+                 * building the request body, so it is deliberately not passed here.
+                 */
+                SmsService.sendSms(smsMessage, {
+                    projectId: incidentEpisode.projectId,
+                    customTwilioConfig: projectTwilioConfig,
+                    userOnCallLogTimelineId: updatedLog.id,
+                    userId: notificationRuleItem.userId,
+                    onCallPolicyId: options.onCallPolicyId,
+                    onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId: options.onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId,
+                    teamId: options.userBelongsToTeamId,
+                    onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineId: options.onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineId,
+                    onCallScheduleId: options.onCallScheduleId,
+                }).catch(async (err) => {
+                    await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.updateOneById({
+                        id: updatedLog.id,
+                        data: {
+                            status: UserNotificationStatus.Error,
+                            statusMessage: err.message || "Error sending SMS.",
+                        },
+                        props: {
+                            isRoot: true,
+                        },
+                    });
+                });
+            }
         }
-        if (((_s = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _s === void 0 ? void 0 : _s.phone) &&
-            !((_t = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _t === void 0 ? void 0 : _t.isVerified)) {
+        if (((_v = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _v === void 0 ? void 0 : _v.phone) &&
+            !((_w = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _w === void 0 ? void 0 : _w.isVerified)) {
             // create a log.
             logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Error;
-            logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `SMS not sent because phone ${(_u = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _u === void 0 ? void 0 : _u.phone.toString()} is not verified.`;
+            logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `SMS not sent because phone ${(_x = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _x === void 0 ? void 0 : _x.phone.toString()} is not verified.`;
             await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
                 data: logTimelineItem,
                 props: {
@@ -552,13 +1058,14 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                 },
             });
         }
-        if (((_v = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _v === void 0 ? void 0 : _v.phone) &&
-            ((_w = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _w === void 0 ? void 0 : _w.isVerified)) {
+        if (((_y = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _y === void 0 ? void 0 : _y.phone) &&
+            ((_z = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _z === void 0 ? void 0 : _z.isVerified)) {
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.AlertCreated &&
                 alert) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
-                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending WhatsApp message to ${(_x = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _x === void 0 ? void 0 : _x.phone.toString()}.`;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending WhatsApp message to ${(_0 = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _0 === void 0 ? void 0 : _0.phone.toString()}.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userWhatsAppId = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp.id;
                 const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
                     data: logTimelineItem,
@@ -593,8 +1100,9 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.IncidentCreated &&
                 incident) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
-                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending WhatsApp message to ${(_y = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _y === void 0 ? void 0 : _y.phone.toString()}.`;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending WhatsApp message to ${(_1 = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _1 === void 0 ? void 0 : _1.phone.toString()}.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userWhatsAppId = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp.id;
                 const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
                     data: logTimelineItem,
@@ -630,8 +1138,9 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.AlertEpisodeCreated &&
                 alertEpisode) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
-                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending WhatsApp message to ${(_z = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _z === void 0 ? void 0 : _z.phone.toString()}.`;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending WhatsApp message to ${(_2 = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _2 === void 0 ? void 0 : _2.phone.toString()}.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userWhatsAppId = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp.id;
                 const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
                     data: logTimelineItem,
@@ -663,11 +1172,52 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                     });
                 });
             }
+            // send WhatsApp for incident episode
+            if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
+                UserNotificationEventType.IncidentEpisodeCreated &&
+                incidentEpisode) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
+                logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending WhatsApp message to ${(_3 = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _3 === void 0 ? void 0 : _3.phone.toString()}.`;
+                logTimelineItem.userWhatsAppId = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp.id;
+                const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
+                    data: logTimelineItem,
+                    props: {
+                        isRoot: true,
+                    },
+                });
+                const whatsAppMessage = await this.generateWhatsAppTemplateForIncidentEpisodeCreated(notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp.phone, incidentEpisode, updatedLog.id);
+                /*
+                 * WhatsAppService accepts incidentEpisodeId but never writes it onto
+                 * the request body, so it is deliberately not passed here.
+                 */
+                WhatsAppService.sendWhatsAppMessage(whatsAppMessage, {
+                    projectId: incidentEpisode.projectId,
+                    userOnCallLogTimelineId: updatedLog.id,
+                    userId: notificationRuleItem.userId,
+                    onCallPolicyId: options.onCallPolicyId,
+                    onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId: options.onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId,
+                    teamId: options.userBelongsToTeamId,
+                    onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineId: options.onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineId,
+                    onCallScheduleId: options.onCallScheduleId,
+                }).catch(async (err) => {
+                    await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.updateOneById({
+                        id: updatedLog.id,
+                        data: {
+                            status: UserNotificationStatus.Error,
+                            statusMessage: err.message || "Error sending WhatsApp message.",
+                        },
+                        props: {
+                            isRoot: true,
+                        },
+                    });
+                });
+            }
         }
-        if (((_0 = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _0 === void 0 ? void 0 : _0.phone) &&
-            !((_1 = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _1 === void 0 ? void 0 : _1.isVerified)) {
+        if (((_4 = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _4 === void 0 ? void 0 : _4.phone) &&
+            !((_5 = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _5 === void 0 ? void 0 : _5.isVerified)) {
             logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Error;
-            logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `WhatsApp message not sent because phone ${(_2 = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _2 === void 0 ? void 0 : _2.phone.toString()} is not verified.`;
+            logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `WhatsApp message not sent because phone ${(_6 = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _6 === void 0 ? void 0 : _6.phone.toString()} is not verified.`;
             logTimelineItem.userWhatsAppId = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp.id;
             await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
                 data: logTimelineItem,
@@ -677,11 +1227,12 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             });
         }
         // send Telegram.
-        if (((_3 = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram) === null || _3 === void 0 ? void 0 : _3.telegramChatId) &&
-            ((_4 = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram) === null || _4 === void 0 ? void 0 : _4.isVerified)) {
+        if (((_7 = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram) === null || _7 === void 0 ? void 0 : _7.telegramChatId) &&
+            ((_8 = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram) === null || _8 === void 0 ? void 0 : _8.isVerified)) {
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.AlertCreated &&
                 alert) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
                 logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending Telegram message.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userTelegramId = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram.id;
@@ -723,6 +1274,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.IncidentCreated &&
                 incident) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
                 logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending Telegram message.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userTelegramId = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram.id;
@@ -764,6 +1316,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.AlertEpisodeCreated &&
                 alertEpisode) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
                 logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending Telegram message.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userTelegramId = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram.id;
@@ -802,9 +1355,54 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                     });
                 });
             }
+            if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
+                UserNotificationEventType.IncidentEpisodeCreated &&
+                incidentEpisode) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
+                logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending Telegram message.`;
+                logTimelineItem.userTelegramId = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram.id;
+                const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
+                    data: logTimelineItem,
+                    props: {
+                        isRoot: true,
+                    },
+                });
+                const telegramMessage = {
+                    to: notificationRuleItem.userTelegram.telegramChatId,
+                    body: await this.generateTelegramBodyForIncidentEpisodeCreated(incidentEpisode, updatedLog.id),
+                    parseMode: "HTML",
+                    disableWebPagePreview: true,
+                };
+                /*
+                 * TelegramService accepts incidentEpisodeId but never writes it onto
+                 * the request body, so it is deliberately not passed here.
+                 */
+                TelegramService.sendTelegramMessage(telegramMessage, {
+                    projectId: incidentEpisode.projectId,
+                    userOnCallLogTimelineId: updatedLog.id,
+                    userId: notificationRuleItem.userId,
+                    onCallPolicyId: options.onCallPolicyId,
+                    onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId: options.onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId,
+                    teamId: options.userBelongsToTeamId,
+                    onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineId: options.onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineId,
+                    onCallScheduleId: options.onCallScheduleId,
+                }).catch(async (err) => {
+                    await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.updateOneById({
+                        id: updatedLog.id,
+                        data: {
+                            status: UserNotificationStatus.Error,
+                            statusMessage: err.message || "Error sending Telegram message.",
+                        },
+                        props: {
+                            isRoot: true,
+                        },
+                    });
+                });
+            }
         }
         if (notificationRuleItem.userTelegram &&
-            !((_5 = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram) === null || _5 === void 0 ? void 0 : _5.isVerified)) {
+            !((_9 = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram) === null || _9 === void 0 ? void 0 : _9.isVerified)) {
             logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Error;
             logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Telegram message not sent because the Telegram account is not verified.`;
             logTimelineItem.userTelegramId = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram.id;
@@ -816,11 +1414,12 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             });
         }
         // send webhook.
-        if ((_6 = notificationRuleItem.userWebhook) === null || _6 === void 0 ? void 0 : _6.webhookUrl) {
+        if ((_10 = notificationRuleItem.userWebhook) === null || _10 === void 0 ? void 0 : _10.webhookUrl) {
             const webhookUrl = notificationRuleItem.userWebhook.webhookUrl;
             const webhookSecret = notificationRuleItem.userWebhook.secret;
             const userWebhookId = notificationRuleItem.userWebhook.id;
             const dispatchWebhook = async (params) => {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
                 logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending webhook to ${webhookUrl}.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userWebhookId = userWebhookId;
@@ -865,19 +1464,19 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                     payload: {
                         eventType: "on-call.alert.created",
                         timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
-                        projectId: ((_7 = alert.projectId) === null || _7 === void 0 ? void 0 : _7.toString()) || "",
+                        projectId: ((_11 = alert.projectId) === null || _11 === void 0 ? void 0 : _11.toString()) || "",
                         userId: notificationRuleItem.userId.toString(),
                         alert: {
-                            id: ((_8 = alert.id) === null || _8 === void 0 ? void 0 : _8.toString()) || "",
+                            id: ((_12 = alert.id) === null || _12 === void 0 ? void 0 : _12.toString()) || "",
                             title: alert.title || "",
                             description: alert.description || "",
                             alertNumber: alert.alertNumber || null,
                             alertNumberWithPrefix: alert.alertNumberWithPrefix || null,
-                            severity: ((_9 = alert.alertSeverity) === null || _9 === void 0 ? void 0 : _9.name) || null,
-                            state: ((_10 = alert.currentAlertState) === null || _10 === void 0 ? void 0 : _10.name) || null,
+                            severity: ((_13 = alert.alertSeverity) === null || _13 === void 0 ? void 0 : _13.name) || null,
+                            state: ((_14 = alert.currentAlertState) === null || _14 === void 0 ? void 0 : _14.name) || null,
                         },
-                        onCallPolicyId: ((_11 = options.onCallPolicyId) === null || _11 === void 0 ? void 0 : _11.toString()) || null,
-                        onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId: ((_12 = options.onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId) === null || _12 === void 0 ? void 0 : _12.toString()) || null,
+                        onCallPolicyId: ((_15 = options.onCallPolicyId) === null || _15 === void 0 ? void 0 : _15.toString()) || null,
+                        onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId: ((_16 = options.onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId) === null || _16 === void 0 ? void 0 : _16.toString()) || null,
                     },
                 });
             }
@@ -891,19 +1490,19 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                     payload: {
                         eventType: "on-call.incident.created",
                         timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
-                        projectId: ((_13 = incident.projectId) === null || _13 === void 0 ? void 0 : _13.toString()) || "",
+                        projectId: ((_17 = incident.projectId) === null || _17 === void 0 ? void 0 : _17.toString()) || "",
                         userId: notificationRuleItem.userId.toString(),
                         incident: {
-                            id: ((_14 = incident.id) === null || _14 === void 0 ? void 0 : _14.toString()) || "",
+                            id: ((_18 = incident.id) === null || _18 === void 0 ? void 0 : _18.toString()) || "",
                             title: incident.title || "",
                             description: incident.description || "",
                             incidentNumber: incident.incidentNumber || null,
                             incidentNumberWithPrefix: incident.incidentNumberWithPrefix || null,
-                            severity: ((_15 = incident.incidentSeverity) === null || _15 === void 0 ? void 0 : _15.name) || null,
-                            state: ((_16 = incident.currentIncidentState) === null || _16 === void 0 ? void 0 : _16.name) || null,
+                            severity: ((_19 = incident.incidentSeverity) === null || _19 === void 0 ? void 0 : _19.name) || null,
+                            state: ((_20 = incident.currentIncidentState) === null || _20 === void 0 ? void 0 : _20.name) || null,
                         },
-                        onCallPolicyId: ((_17 = options.onCallPolicyId) === null || _17 === void 0 ? void 0 : _17.toString()) || null,
-                        onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId: ((_18 = options.onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId) === null || _18 === void 0 ? void 0 : _18.toString()) || null,
+                        onCallPolicyId: ((_21 = options.onCallPolicyId) === null || _21 === void 0 ? void 0 : _21.toString()) || null,
+                        onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId: ((_22 = options.onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId) === null || _22 === void 0 ? void 0 : _22.toString()) || null,
                     },
                 });
             }
@@ -916,19 +1515,19 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                     payload: {
                         eventType: "on-call.alertEpisode.created",
                         timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
-                        projectId: ((_19 = alertEpisode.projectId) === null || _19 === void 0 ? void 0 : _19.toString()) || "",
+                        projectId: ((_23 = alertEpisode.projectId) === null || _23 === void 0 ? void 0 : _23.toString()) || "",
                         userId: notificationRuleItem.userId.toString(),
                         alertEpisode: {
-                            id: ((_20 = alertEpisode.id) === null || _20 === void 0 ? void 0 : _20.toString()) || "",
+                            id: ((_24 = alertEpisode.id) === null || _24 === void 0 ? void 0 : _24.toString()) || "",
                             title: alertEpisode.title || "",
                             description: alertEpisode.description || "",
                             episodeNumber: alertEpisode.episodeNumber || null,
                             episodeNumberWithPrefix: alertEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix || null,
-                            severity: ((_21 = alertEpisode.alertSeverity) === null || _21 === void 0 ? void 0 : _21.name) || null,
-                            state: ((_22 = alertEpisode.currentAlertState) === null || _22 === void 0 ? void 0 : _22.name) || null,
+                            severity: ((_25 = alertEpisode.alertSeverity) === null || _25 === void 0 ? void 0 : _25.name) || null,
+                            state: ((_26 = alertEpisode.currentAlertState) === null || _26 === void 0 ? void 0 : _26.name) || null,
                         },
-                        onCallPolicyId: ((_23 = options.onCallPolicyId) === null || _23 === void 0 ? void 0 : _23.toString()) || null,
-                        onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId: ((_24 = options.onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId) === null || _24 === void 0 ? void 0 : _24.toString()) || null,
+                        onCallPolicyId: ((_27 = options.onCallPolicyId) === null || _27 === void 0 ? void 0 : _27.toString()) || null,
+                        onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId: ((_28 = options.onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId) === null || _28 === void 0 ? void 0 : _28.toString()) || null,
                     },
                 });
             }
@@ -941,33 +1540,34 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                     payload: {
                         eventType: "on-call.incidentEpisode.created",
                         timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
-                        projectId: ((_25 = incidentEpisode.projectId) === null || _25 === void 0 ? void 0 : _25.toString()) || "",
+                        projectId: ((_29 = incidentEpisode.projectId) === null || _29 === void 0 ? void 0 : _29.toString()) || "",
                         userId: notificationRuleItem.userId.toString(),
                         incidentEpisode: {
-                            id: ((_26 = incidentEpisode.id) === null || _26 === void 0 ? void 0 : _26.toString()) || "",
+                            id: ((_30 = incidentEpisode.id) === null || _30 === void 0 ? void 0 : _30.toString()) || "",
                             title: incidentEpisode.title || "",
                             description: incidentEpisode.description || "",
                             episodeNumber: incidentEpisode.episodeNumber || null,
                             episodeNumberWithPrefix: incidentEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix || null,
-                            severity: ((_27 = incidentEpisode.incidentSeverity) === null || _27 === void 0 ? void 0 : _27.name) || null,
-                            state: ((_28 = incidentEpisode.currentIncidentState) === null || _28 === void 0 ? void 0 : _28.name) || null,
+                            severity: ((_31 = incidentEpisode.incidentSeverity) === null || _31 === void 0 ? void 0 : _31.name) || null,
+                            state: ((_32 = incidentEpisode.currentIncidentState) === null || _32 === void 0 ? void 0 : _32.name) || null,
                         },
-                        onCallPolicyId: ((_29 = options.onCallPolicyId) === null || _29 === void 0 ? void 0 : _29.toString()) || null,
-                        onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId: ((_30 = options.onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId) === null || _30 === void 0 ? void 0 : _30.toString()) || null,
+                        onCallPolicyId: ((_33 = options.onCallPolicyId) === null || _33 === void 0 ? void 0 : _33.toString()) || null,
+                        onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId: ((_34 = options.onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId) === null || _34 === void 0 ? void 0 : _34.toString()) || null,
                     },
                 });
             }
         }
         // send call.
-        if (((_31 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _31 === void 0 ? void 0 : _31.phone) &&
-            ((_32 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _32 === void 0 ? void 0 : _32.isVerified)) {
+        if (((_35 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _35 === void 0 ? void 0 : _35.phone) &&
+            ((_36 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _36 === void 0 ? void 0 : _36.isVerified)) {
             // send call for alert
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.AlertCreated &&
                 alert) {
                 // create an error log.
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
-                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Making a call to ${(_33 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _33 === void 0 ? void 0 : _33.phone.toString()}.`;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Making a call to ${(_37 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _37 === void 0 ? void 0 : _37.phone.toString()}.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userCallId = notificationRuleItem.userCall.id;
                 const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
                     data: logTimelineItem,
@@ -975,7 +1575,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                         isRoot: true,
                     },
                 });
-                const callRequest = await this.generateCallTemplateForAlertCreated((_34 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _34 === void 0 ? void 0 : _34.phone, alert, updatedLog.id);
+                const callRequest = await this.generateCallTemplateForAlertCreated((_38 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _38 === void 0 ? void 0 : _38.phone, alert, updatedLog.id);
                 // send call.
                 CallService.makeCall(callRequest, {
                     projectId: alert.projectId,
@@ -1005,8 +1605,9 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                 UserNotificationEventType.IncidentCreated &&
                 incident) {
                 // send call for incident
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
-                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Making a call to ${(_35 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _35 === void 0 ? void 0 : _35.phone.toString()}.`;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Making a call to ${(_39 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _39 === void 0 ? void 0 : _39.phone.toString()}.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userCallId = notificationRuleItem.userCall.id;
                 const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
                     data: logTimelineItem,
@@ -1014,7 +1615,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                         isRoot: true,
                     },
                 });
-                const callRequest = await this.generateCallTemplateForIncidentCreated((_36 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _36 === void 0 ? void 0 : _36.phone, incident, updatedLog.id);
+                const callRequest = await this.generateCallTemplateForIncidentCreated((_40 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _40 === void 0 ? void 0 : _40.phone, incident, updatedLog.id);
                 // send call.
                 CallService.makeCall(callRequest, {
                     projectId: incident.projectId,
@@ -1044,8 +1645,9 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.AlertEpisodeCreated &&
                 alertEpisode) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
-                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Making a call to ${(_37 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _37 === void 0 ? void 0 : _37.phone.toString()}.`;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Making a call to ${(_41 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _41 === void 0 ? void 0 : _41.phone.toString()}.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userCallId = notificationRuleItem.userCall.id;
                 const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
                     data: logTimelineItem,
@@ -1053,7 +1655,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                         isRoot: true,
                     },
                 });
-                const callRequest = await this.generateCallTemplateForAlertEpisodeCreated((_38 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _38 === void 0 ? void 0 : _38.phone, alertEpisode, updatedLog.id);
+                const callRequest = await this.generateCallTemplateForAlertEpisodeCreated((_42 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _42 === void 0 ? void 0 : _42.phone, alertEpisode, updatedLog.id);
                 CallService.makeCall(callRequest, {
                     projectId: alertEpisode.projectId,
                     customTwilioConfig: projectTwilioConfig,
@@ -1078,12 +1680,54 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                     });
                 });
             }
+            // send call for incident episode
+            if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
+                UserNotificationEventType.IncidentEpisodeCreated &&
+                incidentEpisode) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
+                logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
+                logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Making a call to ${(_43 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _43 === void 0 ? void 0 : _43.phone.toString()}.`;
+                logTimelineItem.userCallId = notificationRuleItem.userCall.id;
+                const updatedLog = await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
+                    data: logTimelineItem,
+                    props: {
+                        isRoot: true,
+                    },
+                });
+                const callRequest = await this.generateCallTemplateForIncidentEpisodeCreated((_44 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _44 === void 0 ? void 0 : _44.phone, incidentEpisode, updatedLog.id);
+                /*
+                 * CallService accepts incidentEpisodeId but never writes it onto the
+                 * request body, so it is deliberately not passed here.
+                 */
+                CallService.makeCall(callRequest, {
+                    projectId: incidentEpisode.projectId,
+                    customTwilioConfig: projectTwilioConfig,
+                    userOnCallLogTimelineId: updatedLog.id,
+                    userId: notificationRuleItem.userId,
+                    onCallPolicyId: options.onCallPolicyId,
+                    onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId: options.onCallPolicyEscalationRuleId,
+                    teamId: options.userBelongsToTeamId,
+                    onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineId: options.onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogTimelineId,
+                    onCallScheduleId: options.onCallScheduleId,
+                }).catch(async (err) => {
+                    await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.updateOneById({
+                        id: updatedLog.id,
+                        data: {
+                            status: UserNotificationStatus.Error,
+                            statusMessage: err.message || "Error making call.",
+                        },
+                        props: {
+                            isRoot: true,
+                        },
+                    });
+                });
+            }
         }
-        if (((_39 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _39 === void 0 ? void 0 : _39.phone) &&
-            !((_40 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _40 === void 0 ? void 0 : _40.isVerified)) {
+        if (((_45 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _45 === void 0 ? void 0 : _45.phone) &&
+            !((_46 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _46 === void 0 ? void 0 : _46.isVerified)) {
             // create a log.
             logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Error;
-            logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Call not sent because phone ${(_41 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _41 === void 0 ? void 0 : _41.phone.toString()} is not verified.`;
+            logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Call not sent because phone ${(_47 = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _47 === void 0 ? void 0 : _47.phone.toString()} is not verified.`;
             await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
                 data: logTimelineItem,
                 props: {
@@ -1092,13 +1736,14 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             });
         }
         // send push notification.
-        if (((_42 = notificationRuleItem.userPush) === null || _42 === void 0 ? void 0 : _42.deviceToken) &&
-            ((_43 = notificationRuleItem.userPush) === null || _43 === void 0 ? void 0 : _43.isVerified)) {
+        if (((_48 = notificationRuleItem.userPush) === null || _48 === void 0 ? void 0 : _48.deviceToken) &&
+            ((_49 = notificationRuleItem.userPush) === null || _49 === void 0 ? void 0 : _49.isVerified)) {
             // send push notification for alert
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.AlertCreated &&
                 alert) {
                 // create a log.
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
                 logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending push notification to device.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userPushId = notificationRuleItem.userPush.id;
@@ -1108,7 +1753,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                         isRoot: true,
                     },
                 });
-                const pushMessage = PushNotificationUtil.createAlertCreatedNotification(Object.assign(Object.assign(Object.assign({ alertTitle: alert.title, projectName: ((_44 = alert.project) === null || _44 === void 0 ? void 0 : _44.name) || "OneUptime", alertViewLink: (await AlertService.getAlertLinkInDashboard(alert.projectId, alert.id)).toString() }, (alert.alertNumber !== undefined && {
+                const pushMessage = PushNotificationUtil.createAlertCreatedNotification(Object.assign(Object.assign(Object.assign({ alertTitle: alert.title, projectName: ((_50 = alert.project) === null || _50 === void 0 ? void 0 : _50.name) || "OneUptime", alertViewLink: (await AlertService.getAlertLinkInDashboard(alert.projectId, alert.id)).toString() }, (alert.alertNumber !== undefined && {
                     alertNumber: alert.alertNumber,
                 })), (alert.alertNumberWithPrefix && {
                     alertNumberWithPrefix: alert.alertNumberWithPrefix,
@@ -1151,6 +1796,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                 UserNotificationEventType.IncidentCreated &&
                 incident) {
                 // create a log.
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
                 logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending push notification to device.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userPushId = notificationRuleItem.userPush.id;
@@ -1160,7 +1806,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                         isRoot: true,
                     },
                 });
-                const pushMessage = PushNotificationUtil.createIncidentCreatedNotification(Object.assign(Object.assign(Object.assign({ incidentTitle: incident.title, projectName: ((_45 = incident.project) === null || _45 === void 0 ? void 0 : _45.name) || "OneUptime", incidentViewLink: (await IncidentService.getIncidentLinkInDashboard(incident.projectId, incident.id)).toString() }, (incident.incidentNumber !== undefined && {
+                const pushMessage = PushNotificationUtil.createIncidentCreatedNotification(Object.assign(Object.assign(Object.assign({ incidentTitle: incident.title, projectName: ((_51 = incident.project) === null || _51 === void 0 ? void 0 : _51.name) || "OneUptime", incidentViewLink: (await IncidentService.getIncidentLinkInDashboard(incident.projectId, incident.id)).toString() }, (incident.incidentNumber !== undefined && {
                     incidentNumber: incident.incidentNumber,
                 })), (incident.incidentNumberWithPrefix && {
                     incidentNumberWithPrefix: incident.incidentNumberWithPrefix,
@@ -1202,6 +1848,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.AlertEpisodeCreated &&
                 alertEpisode) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
                 logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending push notification to device.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userPushId = notificationRuleItem.userPush.id;
@@ -1211,7 +1858,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                         isRoot: true,
                     },
                 });
-                const pushMessage = PushNotificationUtil.createAlertEpisodeCreatedNotification(Object.assign(Object.assign(Object.assign({ alertEpisodeTitle: alertEpisode.title, projectName: ((_46 = alertEpisode.project) === null || _46 === void 0 ? void 0 : _46.name) || "OneUptime", alertEpisodeViewLink: (await AlertEpisodeService.getEpisodeLinkInDashboard(alertEpisode.projectId, alertEpisode.id)).toString() }, (alertEpisode.episodeNumber !== undefined && {
+                const pushMessage = PushNotificationUtil.createAlertEpisodeCreatedNotification(Object.assign(Object.assign(Object.assign({ alertEpisodeTitle: alertEpisode.title, projectName: ((_52 = alertEpisode.project) === null || _52 === void 0 ? void 0 : _52.name) || "OneUptime", alertEpisodeViewLink: (await AlertEpisodeService.getEpisodeLinkInDashboard(alertEpisode.projectId, alertEpisode.id)).toString() }, (alertEpisode.episodeNumber !== undefined && {
                     episodeNumber: alertEpisode.episodeNumber,
                 })), (alertEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix && {
                     episodeNumberWithPrefix: alertEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix,
@@ -1252,6 +1899,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             if (options.userNotificationEventType ===
                 UserNotificationEventType.IncidentEpisodeCreated &&
                 incidentEpisode) {
+                deliveryAttempted = true;
                 logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Sending;
                 logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Sending push notification to device.`;
                 logTimelineItem.userPushId = notificationRuleItem.userPush.id;
@@ -1261,7 +1909,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                         isRoot: true,
                     },
                 });
-                const pushMessage = PushNotificationUtil.createIncidentEpisodeCreatedNotification(Object.assign(Object.assign(Object.assign({ incidentEpisodeTitle: incidentEpisode.title, projectName: ((_47 = incidentEpisode.project) === null || _47 === void 0 ? void 0 : _47.name) || "OneUptime", incidentEpisodeViewLink: (await IncidentEpisodeService.getEpisodeLinkInDashboard(incidentEpisode.projectId, incidentEpisode.id)).toString() }, (incidentEpisode.episodeNumber !== undefined && {
+                const pushMessage = PushNotificationUtil.createIncidentEpisodeCreatedNotification(Object.assign(Object.assign(Object.assign({ incidentEpisodeTitle: incidentEpisode.title, projectName: ((_53 = incidentEpisode.project) === null || _53 === void 0 ? void 0 : _53.name) || "OneUptime", incidentEpisodeViewLink: (await IncidentEpisodeService.getEpisodeLinkInDashboard(incidentEpisode.projectId, incidentEpisode.id)).toString() }, (incidentEpisode.episodeNumber !== undefined && {
                     episodeNumber: incidentEpisode.episodeNumber,
                 })), (incidentEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix && {
                     episodeNumberWithPrefix: incidentEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix,
@@ -1298,8 +1946,8 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                 });
             }
         }
-        if (((_48 = notificationRuleItem.userPush) === null || _48 === void 0 ? void 0 : _48.deviceToken) &&
-            !((_49 = notificationRuleItem.userPush) === null || _49 === void 0 ? void 0 : _49.isVerified)) {
+        if (((_54 = notificationRuleItem.userPush) === null || _54 === void 0 ? void 0 : _54.deviceToken) &&
+            !((_55 = notificationRuleItem.userPush) === null || _55 === void 0 ? void 0 : _55.isVerified)) {
             // create a log.
             logTimelineItem.status = UserNotificationStatus.Error;
             logTimelineItem.statusMessage = `Push notification not sent because device is not verified.`;
@@ -1310,29 +1958,420 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                 },
             });
         }
-    }
-    async generateCallTemplateForAlertCreated(to, alert, userOnCallLogTimelineId) {
-        const host = await DatabaseConfig.getHost();
-        const httpProtocol = await DatabaseConfig.getHttpProtocol();
-        const alertIdentifier = alert.alertNumber !== undefined
-            ? `Alert number ${alert.alertNumber}, ${alert.title || "Alert"}`
-            : alert.title || "Alert";
-        const callRequest = {
-            to: to,
-            data: [
-                {
-                    sayMessage: "This is a call from One Uptime",
-                },
-                {
-                    sayMessage: "A new alert has been created",
-                },
-                {
-                    sayMessage: alertIdentifier,
+        /*
+         * The fell-through guard.
+         *
+         * Gap F was a whole class of lost pages: a contactable channel, an event
+         * type that no block in that channel branched on, and therefore neither a
+         * send nor an error row — the responder was simply never told, and nothing
+         * anywhere recorded that. Rather than trust that every future event type
+         * gets wired into all seven blocks, make the omission loud.
+         *
+         * The row is built fresh instead of reusing logTimelineItem: that instance
+         * picks up an _id as soon as any block has created a row with it, and a
+         * second create() with it would UPDATE that row rather than insert this one.
+         */
+        if (contactableChannels.length > 0 && !deliveryAttempted) {
+            const statusMessage = `No notification template for ${options.userNotificationEventType} on ${contactableChannels.join(", ")}.`;
+            const fellThroughRow = this.buildLogTimelineItem(notificationRuleItem, options);
+            fellThroughRow.status = UserNotificationStatus.Error;
+            fellThroughRow.statusMessage = statusMessage;
+            await UserOnCallLogTimelineService.create({
+                data: fellThroughRow,
+                props: {
+                    isRoot: true,
                 },
-                {
-                    introMessage: "To acknowledge this alert press 1",
-                    numDigits: 1,
-                    timeoutInSeconds: 10,
+            });
+            logger.error(`${statusMessage} User on-call log: ${options.userNotificationLogId.toString()}`);
+        }
+        return deliveryAttempted;
+    }
+    /*
+     * The channels this rule could actually reach the user on, by display name.
+     *
+     * These are the same gates each channel block opens with, so an empty list
+     * means "this rule can contact nobody" — a rule whose method was
+     * cascade-deleted, say — and a non-empty one means a page was expected to go
+     * out. Webhooks have no verification concept at all (UserWebhook has no
+     * isVerified column), so presence of a URL is the whole gate there.
+     */
+    getContactableChannelNames(notificationRuleItem) {
+        var _a, _b, _c, _d, _e, _f, _g, _h, _j, _k, _l, _m, _o;
+        const channels = [];
+        if (((_a = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a.email) &&
+            ((_b = notificationRuleItem.userEmail) === null || _b === void 0 ? void 0 : _b.isVerified)) {
+            channels.push("Email");
+        }
+        if (((_c = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _c === void 0 ? void 0 : _c.phone) &&
+            ((_d = notificationRuleItem.userSms) === null || _d === void 0 ? void 0 : _d.isVerified)) {
+            channels.push("SMS");
+        }
+        if (((_e = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _e === void 0 ? void 0 : _e.phone) &&
+            ((_f = notificationRuleItem.userWhatsApp) === null || _f === void 0 ? void 0 : _f.isVerified)) {
+            channels.push("WhatsApp");
+        }
+        if (((_g = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram) === null || _g === void 0 ? void 0 : _g.telegramChatId) &&
+            ((_h = notificationRuleItem.userTelegram) === null || _h === void 0 ? void 0 : _h.isVerified)) {
+            channels.push("Telegram");
+        }
+        if ((_j = notificationRuleItem.userWebhook) === null || _j === void 0 ? void 0 : _j.webhookUrl) {
+            channels.push("Webhook");
+        }
+        if (((_k = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _k === void 0 ? void 0 : _k.phone) &&
+            ((_l = notificationRuleItem.userCall) === null || _l === void 0 ? void 0 : _l.isVerified)) {
+            channels.push("Call");
+        }
+        if (((_m = notificationRuleItem.userPush) === null || _m === void 0 ? void 0 : _m.deviceToken) &&
+            ((_o = notificationRuleItem.userPush) === null || _o === void 0 ? void 0 : _o.isVerified)) {
+            channels.push("Push");
+        }
+        return channels;
+    }
+    /*
+     * Page a responder who has NO notification rule matching what just fired.
+     *
+     * Zero matching rules is indistinguishable from "never configured" unless the
+     * user said otherwise, so the caller (UserOnCallLogService.onCreateSuccess)
+     * checks for an explicit opt-out row first and only reaches here when the
+     * silence looks accidental. Reaching a human on whatever they have verified
+     * beats honouring a configuration they never made.
+     *
+     * Nothing here observes delivery success: every send below is fire-and-forget
+     * (see deliverNotificationForRule), so `notified` means "a page was handed to
+     * the sender", not "a phone rang".
+     *
+     * The three ways this can end are spelled out in FallbackNotificationOutcome,
+     * and the caller must branch on them rather than on `notified` alone: only
+     * NoUsableNotificationMethod describes a responder who cannot be reached, and
+     * only that one is safe to record as a terminal status.
+     */
+    async executeFallbackNotification(options) {
+        /*
+         * Claim the log under the reserved fallback key before doing anything, so
+         * two overlapping cron ticks cannot both fall back and double-page the same
+         * responder for one escalation.
+         */
+        const claimed = await UserOnCallLogService.claimNotificationExecution({
+            userOnCallLogId: options.userOnCallLogId,
+            claimKey: FALLBACK_NOTIFICATION_CLAIM_KEY,
+        });
+        if (!claimed) {
+            /*
+             * A concurrent run already fell back for this log; it owns everything
+             * that happens next, including the log's final status. Reported as the
+             * transient outcome rather than as "no usable method", because the
+             * caller's response to the latter is a terminal Error — which would
+             * stamp "this responder is unreachable" over a page that is in flight.
+             */
+            return {
+                outcome: FallbackNotificationOutcome.DeliveryFailed,
+                notified: false,
+                channelsUsed: [],
+            };
+        }
+        const fallbackRules = await this.chooseFallbackChannels(options);
+        if (fallbackRules.length === 0) {
+            logger.warn(`On-call fallback found no usable notification method for user ${options.userId.toString()} in project ${options.projectId.toString()} (${options.severityName} ${options.ruleType}). The page cannot be delivered.`);
+            return {
+                outcome: FallbackNotificationOutcome.NoUsableNotificationMethod,
+                notified: false,
+                channelsUsed: [],
+            };
+        }
+        const channelsUsed = [];
+        let anAttemptFailed = false;
+        /*
+         * One delivery call per channel, never a loop inside one call: the timeline
+         * row is a single mutable object inside deliverNotificationForRule, and a
+         * second create() with it would UPDATE the row the first channel wrote
+         * instead of inserting a second one — the second page would vanish from the
+         * timeline and, worse, overwrite the first one's status.
+         */
+        for (const fallbackRule of fallbackRules) {
+            try {
+                const dispatched = await this.deliverNotificationForRule(fallbackRule.rule, options);
+                /*
+                 * Only a genuine dispatch earns a place in channelsUsed. The channel
+                 * names in here are read back to the operator as "notified via fallback
+                 * (Push, Email)", so a name added merely because the call resolved is a
+                 * lie in the one place somebody looks to find out whether the responder
+                 * was reached — and deliverNotificationForRule resolves perfectly
+                 * happily when no block claimed the event type.
+                 */
+                if (dispatched) {
+                    channelsUsed.push(fallbackRule.channelName);
+                }
+                else {
+                    anAttemptFailed = true;
+                    logger.error(`On-call fallback dispatched nothing on ${fallbackRule.channelName} for user ${options.userId.toString()}: no notification template matched ${options.userNotificationEventType}.`);
+                }
+            }
+            catch (err) {
+                anAttemptFailed = true;
+                logger.error(`On-call fallback failed to deliver on ${fallbackRule.channelName} for user ${options.userId.toString()}.`);
+                logger.error(err);
+            }
+        }
+        if (channelsUsed.length > 0) {
+            return {
+                outcome: FallbackNotificationOutcome.Delivered,
+                notified: true,
+                channelsUsed: channelsUsed,
+            };
+        }
+        /*
+         * There were channels to try and not one of them carried a page. That is
+         * emphatically not the "responder has no notification method" case —
+         * chooseFallbackChannels returns only verified, project-enabled methods, so
+         * the responder is reachable and today simply failed to be reached.
+         *
+         * anAttemptFailed is necessarily true on this line, since every path
+         * through the loop that does not push a channel sets it. It is read rather
+         * than assumed so that a future channel that can finish without either
+         * dispatching or failing degrades into the transient outcome instead of
+         * silently telling the operator the responder has nothing configured.
+         */
+        return {
+            outcome: anAttemptFailed
+                ? FallbackNotificationOutcome.DeliveryFailed
+                : FallbackNotificationOutcome.NoUsableNotificationMethod,
+            notified: false,
+            channelsUsed: [],
+        };
+    }
+    /*
+     * Pick what to page the user on, and build an unsaved rule for each choice.
+     *
+     * Zero-cost channels win: push and email reach the most people for no money
+     * and no billing surprise, and there is no reason to pick between them, so a
+     * user who has both gets both. Only a user with neither is worth spending on,
+     * and then just once, in escalating-intrusiveness order.
+     *
+     * Paid channels are additionally gated on the project's own enable flags.
+     * SmsService and CallService enforce those at send time, but WhatsApp and
+     * Telegram only check them when a method is created — so a project that
+     * switched WhatsApp off would still be billed by a fallback that did not look.
+     */
+    async chooseFallbackChannels(options) {
+        const chosen = [];
+        const userPush = await UserPushService.findOneBy({
+            query: {
+                projectId: options.projectId,
+                userId: options.userId,
+                isVerified: true,
+            },
+            select: {
+                _id: true,
+                deviceToken: true,
+                deviceType: true,
+                isVerified: true,
+            },
+            props: {
+                isRoot: true,
+            },
+        });
+        if (userPush) {
+            const rule = this.buildUnsavedFallbackRule(options);
+            rule.userPush = userPush;
+            rule.userPushId = userPush.id;
+            chosen.push({ channelName: "Push", rule: rule });
+        }
+        const userEmail = await UserEmailService.findOneBy({
+            query: {
+                projectId: options.projectId,
+                userId: options.userId,
+                isVerified: true,
+            },
+            select: {
+                _id: true,
+                email: true,
+                isVerified: true,
+            },
+            props: {
+                isRoot: true,
+            },
+        });
+        if (userEmail) {
+            const rule = this.buildUnsavedFallbackRule(options);
+            rule.userEmail = userEmail;
+            rule.userEmailId = userEmail.id;
+            chosen.push({ channelName: "Email", rule: rule });
+        }
+        if (chosen.length > 0) {
+            return chosen;
+        }
+        const project = await ProjectService.findOneById({
+            id: options.projectId,
+            select: {
+                enableSmsNotifications: true,
+                enableCallNotifications: true,
+                enableWhatsAppNotifications: true,
+                enableTelegramNotifications: true,
+            },
+            props: {
+                isRoot: true,
+            },
+        });
+        if (project === null || project === void 0 ? void 0 : project.enableSmsNotifications) {
+            const userSms = await UserSmsService.findOneBy({
+                query: {
+                    projectId: options.projectId,
+                    userId: options.userId,
+                    isVerified: true,
+                },
+                select: {
+                    _id: true,
+                    phone: true,
+                    isVerified: true,
+                },
+                props: {
+                    isRoot: true,
+                },
+            });
+            if (userSms) {
+                const rule = this.buildUnsavedFallbackRule(options);
+                rule.userSms = userSms;
+                rule.userSmsId = userSms.id;
+                return [{ channelName: "SMS", rule: rule }];
+            }
+        }
+        if (project === null || project === void 0 ? void 0 : project.enableCallNotifications) {
+            const userCall = await UserCallService.findOneBy({
+                query: {
+                    projectId: options.projectId,
+                    userId: options.userId,
+                    isVerified: true,
+                },
+                select: {
+                    _id: true,
+                    phone: true,
+                    isVerified: true,
+                },
+                props: {
+                    isRoot: true,
+                },
+            });
+            if (userCall) {
+                const rule = this.buildUnsavedFallbackRule(options);
+                rule.userCall = userCall;
+                rule.userCallId = userCall.id;
+                return [{ channelName: "Call", rule: rule }];
+            }
+        }
+        if (project === null || project === void 0 ? void 0 : project.enableWhatsAppNotifications) {
+            const userWhatsApp = await UserWhatsAppService.findOneBy({
+                query: {
+                    projectId: options.projectId,
+                    userId: options.userId,
+                    isVerified: true,
+                },
+                select: {
+                    _id: true,
+                    phone: true,
+                    isVerified: true,
+                },
+                props: {
+                    isRoot: true,
+                },
+            });
+            if (userWhatsApp) {
+                const rule = this.buildUnsavedFallbackRule(options);
+                rule.userWhatsApp = userWhatsApp;
+                rule.userWhatsAppId = userWhatsApp.id;
+                return [{ channelName: "WhatsApp", rule: rule }];
+            }
+        }
+        if (project === null || project === void 0 ? void 0 : project.enableTelegramNotifications) {
+            const userTelegram = await UserTelegramService.findOneBy({
+                query: {
+                    projectId: options.projectId,
+                    userId: options.userId,
+                    isVerified: true,
+                },
+                select: {
+                    _id: true,
+                    telegramChatId: true,
+                    telegramUserHandle: true,
+                    isVerified: true,
+                },
+                props: {
+                    isRoot: true,
+                },
+            });
+            if (userTelegram) {
+                const rule = this.buildUnsavedFallbackRule(options);
+                rule.userTelegram = userTelegram;
+                rule.userTelegramId = userTelegram.id;
+                return [{ channelName: "Telegram", rule: rule }];
+            }
+        }
+        /*
+         * A webhook costs the project nothing and has no verification concept at
+         * all (UserWebhook has no isVerified column), so its presence is the whole
+         * test, and there is no project flag to consult.
+         */
+        const userWebhook = await UserWebhookService.findOneBy({
+            query: {
+                projectId: options.projectId,
+                userId: options.userId,
+            },
+            select: {
+                _id: true,
+                webhookUrl: true,
+                name: true,
+                secret: true,
+            },
+            props: {
+                isRoot: true,
+            },
+        });
+        if (userWebhook) {
+            const rule = this.buildUnsavedFallbackRule(options);
+            rule.userWebhook = userWebhook;
+            rule.userWebhookId = userWebhook.id;
+            return [{ channelName: "Webhook", rule: rule }];
+        }
+        return chosen;
+    }
+    /*
+     * A UserNotificationRule that exists only for the length of one delivery.
+     *
+     * It is never saved: the user did not ask for this rule, and persisting it
+     * would silently rewrite their configuration behind their back. The method
+     * relation is populated as a loaded entity rather than just its FK because
+     * deliverNotificationForRule reads the relation (userEmail.email,
+     * userEmail.isVerified) and never dereferences the id.
+     */
+    buildUnsavedFallbackRule(options) {
+        const rule = new Model();
+        rule.projectId = options.projectId;
+        rule.userId = options.userId;
+        rule.ruleType = options.ruleType;
+        rule.notifyAfterMinutes = 0;
+        return rule;
+    }
+    async generateCallTemplateForAlertCreated(to, alert, userOnCallLogTimelineId) {
+        const host = await DatabaseConfig.getHost();
+        const httpProtocol = await DatabaseConfig.getHttpProtocol();
+        const alertIdentifier = alert.alertNumber !== undefined
+            ? `Alert number ${alert.alertNumber}, ${alert.title || "Alert"}`
+            : alert.title || "Alert";
+        const callRequest = {
+            to: to,
+            data: [
+                {
+                    sayMessage: "This is a call from One Uptime",
+                },
+                {
+                    sayMessage: "A new alert has been created",
+                },
+                {
+                    sayMessage: alertIdentifier,
+                },
+                {
+                    introMessage: "To acknowledge this alert press 1",
+                    numDigits: 1,
+                    timeoutInSeconds: 10,
                     noInputMessage: "You have not entered any input. Good bye",
                     onInputCallRequest: {
                         "1": {
@@ -1430,6 +2469,47 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
         };
         return callRequest;
     }
+    async generateCallTemplateForIncidentEpisodeCreated(to, incidentEpisode, userOnCallLogTimelineId) {
+        const host = await DatabaseConfig.getHost();
+        const httpProtocol = await DatabaseConfig.getHttpProtocol();
+        const episodeIdentifier = incidentEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix
+            ? `Incident episode ${incidentEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix}, ${incidentEpisode.title || "Incident Episode"}`
+            : incidentEpisode.episodeNumber !== undefined
+                ? `Incident episode number ${incidentEpisode.episodeNumber}, ${incidentEpisode.title || "Incident Episode"}`
+                : incidentEpisode.title || "Incident Episode";
+        const callRequest = {
+            to: to,
+            data: [
+                {
+                    sayMessage: "This is a call from One Uptime",
+                },
+                {
+                    sayMessage: "A new incident episode has been created",
+                },
+                {
+                    sayMessage: episodeIdentifier,
+                },
+                {
+                    introMessage: "To acknowledge this incident episode press 1",
+                    numDigits: 1,
+                    timeoutInSeconds: 10,
+                    noInputMessage: "You have not entered any input. Good bye",
+                    onInputCallRequest: {
+                        "1": {
+                            sayMessage: "You have acknowledged this incident episode. Good bye",
+                        },
+                        default: {
+                            sayMessage: "Invalid input. Good bye",
+                        },
+                    },
+                    responseUrl: new URL(httpProtocol, host, new Route(AppApiRoute.toString())
+                        .addRoute(new UserOnCallLogTimeline().crudApiPath)
+                        .addRoute("/call/gather-input/" + userOnCallLogTimelineId.toString())),
+                },
+            ],
+        };
+        return callRequest;
+    }
     async generateSmsTemplateForAlertCreated(to, alert, userOnCallLogTimelineId) {
         const host = await DatabaseConfig.getHost();
         const httpProtocol = await DatabaseConfig.getHttpProtocol();
@@ -1480,6 +2560,19 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
         };
         return sms;
     }
+    async generateSmsTemplateForIncidentEpisodeCreated(to, incidentEpisode, userOnCallLogTimelineId) {
+        const url = await this.buildOnCallAcknowledgeShortUrl(userOnCallLogTimelineId);
+        const episodeIdentifier = incidentEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix
+            ? `${incidentEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix} (${incidentEpisode.title || "Incident Episode"})`
+            : incidentEpisode.episodeNumber !== undefined
+                ? `#${incidentEpisode.episodeNumber} (${incidentEpisode.title || "Incident Episode"})`
+                : incidentEpisode.title || "Incident Episode";
+        const sms = {
+            to,
+            message: `This is a message from OneUptime. A new incident episode has been created: ${episodeIdentifier}. To acknowledge this incident episode, please click on the following link ${url.toString()}`,
+        };
+        return sms;
+    }
     async buildOnCallAcknowledgeShortUrl(userOnCallLogTimelineId) {
         const host = await DatabaseConfig.getHost();
         const httpProtocol = await DatabaseConfig.getHttpProtocol();
@@ -1557,6 +2650,27 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
         lines.push("", `✅ <a href="${this.escapeTelegramHtml(ackUrl.toString())}">Tap to acknowledge</a>`);
         return lines.join("\n");
     }
+    async generateTelegramBodyForIncidentEpisodeCreated(incidentEpisode, userOnCallLogTimelineId) {
+        const ackUrl = await this.buildOnCallAcknowledgeShortUrl(userOnCallLogTimelineId);
+        const episodeIdentifier = incidentEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix
+            ? `${incidentEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix} — ${incidentEpisode.title || "Incident Episode"}`
+            : incidentEpisode.episodeNumber !== undefined
+                ? `#${incidentEpisode.episodeNumber} — ${incidentEpisode.title || "Incident Episode"}`
+                : incidentEpisode.title || "Incident Episode";
+        const lines = [
+            "🔥 <b>New incident episode assigned to you</b>",
+            "",
+            `📋 <b>${this.escapeTelegramHtml(episodeIdentifier)}</b>`,
+            "",
+            "👤 You're getting this because you're on call.",
+        ];
+        if (incidentEpisode.projectId && incidentEpisode.id) {
+            const dashboardUrl = await IncidentEpisodeService.getEpisodeLinkInDashboard(incidentEpisode.projectId, incidentEpisode.id);
+            lines.push("", `🔎 <a href="${this.escapeTelegramHtml(dashboardUrl.toString())}">View incident episode in OneUptime</a>`);
+        }
+        lines.push("", `✅ <a href="${this.escapeTelegramHtml(ackUrl.toString())}">Tap to acknowledge</a>`);
+        return lines.join("\n");
+    }
     async generateWhatsAppTemplateForAlertCreated(to, alert, userOnCallLogTimelineId) {
         var _a;
         const host = await DatabaseConfig.getHost();
@@ -1646,6 +2760,32 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             templateLanguageCode: WhatsAppTemplateLanguage[templateKey],
         };
     }
+    async generateWhatsAppTemplateForIncidentEpisodeCreated(to, incidentEpisode, userOnCallLogTimelineId) {
+        var _a;
+        const acknowledgeUrl = await this.buildOnCallAcknowledgeShortUrl(userOnCallLogTimelineId);
+        const episodeLinkOnDashboard = incidentEpisode.projectId && incidentEpisode.id
+            ? (await IncidentEpisodeService.getEpisodeLinkInDashboard(incidentEpisode.projectId, incidentEpisode.id)).toString()
+            : acknowledgeUrl.toString();
+        const templateKey = WhatsAppTemplateIds.IncidentEpisodeCreated;
+        const templateVariables = {
+            project_name: ((_a = incidentEpisode.project) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a.name) || "OneUptime",
+            episode_title: incidentEpisode.title || "",
+            acknowledge_url: acknowledgeUrl.toString(),
+            episode_number: incidentEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix ||
+                (incidentEpisode.episodeNumber !== undefined
+                    ? incidentEpisode.episodeNumber.toString()
+                    : ""),
+            episode_link: episodeLinkOnDashboard,
+        };
+        const body = renderWhatsAppTemplate(templateKey, templateVariables);
+        return {
+            to,
+            body,
+            templateKey,
+            templateVariables,
+            templateLanguageCode: WhatsAppTemplateLanguage[templateKey],
+        };
+    }
     async generateEmailTemplateForAlertCreated(to, alert, userOnCallLogTimelineId) {
         const host = await DatabaseConfig.getHost();
         const httpProtocol = await DatabaseConfig.getHttpProtocol();
@@ -1822,30 +2962,169 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
         };
         return emailMessage;
     }
-    async startUserNotificationRulesExecution(userId, options) {
-        // add user notification log.
-        const userOnCallLog = new UserOnCallLog();
-        userOnCallLog.userId = userId;
-        userOnCallLog.projectId = options.projectId;
-        if (options.triggeredByIncidentId) {
-            userOnCallLog.triggeredByIncidentId = options.triggeredByIncidentId;
-        }
-        if (options.triggeredByAlertId) {
-            userOnCallLog.triggeredByAlertId = options.triggeredByAlertId;
-        }
-        if (options.triggeredByAlertEpisodeId) {
-            userOnCallLog.triggeredByAlertEpisodeId =
-                options.triggeredByAlertEpisodeId;
-        }
-        if (options.triggeredByIncidentEpisodeId) {
-            userOnCallLog.triggeredByIncidentEpisodeId =
-                options.triggeredByIncidentEpisodeId;
-        }
-        userOnCallLog.userNotificationEventType = options.userNotificationEventType;
-        if (options.onCallPolicyExecutionLogId) {
-            userOnCallLog.onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogId =
-                options.onCallPolicyExecutionLogId;
-        }
+    async generateEmailTemplateForIncidentEpisodeCreated(to, incidentEpisode, userOnCallLogTimelineId) {
+        const host = await DatabaseConfig.getHost();
+        const httpProtocol = await DatabaseConfig.getHttpProtocol();
+        // Fetch incidents that are members of this episode
+        const episodeMembers = await IncidentEpisodeMemberService.findBy({
+            query: {
+                incidentEpisodeId: incidentEpisode.id,
+            },
+            select: {
+                incidentId: true,
+            },
+            props: {
+                isRoot: true,
+            },
+            limit: LIMIT_PER_PROJECT,
+            skip: 0,
+        });
+        // Get the incident IDs
+        const incidentIds = episodeMembers
+            .map((member) => {
+            return member.incidentId;
+        })
+            .filter((id) => {
+            return id !== undefined;
+        });
+        // Fetch full incident data with monitors
+        const incidents = incidentIds.length > 0
+            ? await IncidentService.findBy({
+                query: {
+                    _id: QueryHelper.any(incidentIds),
+                },
+                select: {
+                    _id: true,
+                    title: true,
+                    incidentNumber: true,
+                    incidentNumberWithPrefix: true,
+                    monitors: {
+                        _id: true,
+                        name: true,
+                    },
+                },
+                props: {
+                    isRoot: true,
+                },
+                limit: LIMIT_PER_PROJECT,
+                skip: 0,
+            })
+            : [];
+        /*
+         * Unique monitors across every incident in the episode. An incident carries
+         * a list of monitors (unlike an alert, which has exactly one), so this
+         * flattens rather than reading a single relation.
+         */
+        const monitorNames = new Set();
+        for (const incident of incidents) {
+            for (const monitor of incident.monitors || []) {
+                if (monitor.name) {
+                    monitorNames.add(monitor.name);
+                }
+            }
+        }
+        const resourcesAffected = monitorNames.size > 0
+            ? Array.from(monitorNames).join(", ")
+            : "No resources identified";
+        // Build incidents list HTML with proper email styling
+        let incidentsListHtml = "";
+        if (incidents.length > 0) {
+            const incidentRows = [];
+            for (const incident of incidents) {
+                const incidentTitle = incident.title || "Untitled Incident";
+                const incidentNumber = incident.incidentNumberWithPrefix ||
+                    (incident.incidentNumber ? `#${incident.incidentNumber}` : "");
+                const incidentLink = (await IncidentService.getIncidentLinkInDashboard(incidentEpisode.projectId, incident.id)).toString();
+                const monitorName = (incident.monitors || [])
+                    .map((monitor) => {
+                    return monitor.name || "";
+                })
+                    .filter((name) => {
+                    return name.length > 0;
+                })
+                    .join(", ") || "";
+                incidentRows.push(`
+            <tr>
+              <td style="padding: 12px 16px; border-bottom: 1px solid #e2e8f0;">
+                <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
+                  <tr>
+                    <td style="vertical-align: middle;">
+                      <span style="display: inline-block; background-color: #fee2e2; color: #991b1b; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 600; padding: 2px 8px; border-radius: 4px; margin-right: 8px;">${incidentNumber}</span>
+                      <a href="${incidentLink}" style="color: #2563eb; font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500; text-decoration: none;">${incidentTitle}</a>
+                      ${monitorName ? `<span style="display: block; color: #64748b; font-size: 12px; margin-top: 4px;">Monitor: ${monitorName}</span>` : ""}
+                    </td>
+                    <td style="text-align: right; vertical-align: middle;">
+                      <a href="${incidentLink}" style="color: #2563eb; font-size: 12px; text-decoration: none;">View →</a>
+                    </td>
+                  </tr>
+                </table>
+              </td>
+            </tr>
+          `);
+            }
+            if (incidentRows.length > 0) {
+                incidentsListHtml = `
+          <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="background: linear-gradient(135deg, #f8fafc 0%, #f1f5f9 100%); border-radius: 8px; border: 1px solid #e2e8f0; margin: 8px 0 16px 0;">
+            <tbody>
+              ${incidentRows.join("")}
+            </tbody>
+          </table>
+        `;
+            }
+        }
+        const episodeNumber = incidentEpisode.episodeNumberWithPrefix ||
+            (incidentEpisode.episodeNumber
+                ? `#${incidentEpisode.episodeNumber}`
+                : "");
+        const vars = {
+            incidentEpisodeTitle: incidentEpisode.title,
+            episodeNumber: episodeNumber,
+            projectName: incidentEpisode.project.name,
+            currentState: incidentEpisode.currentIncidentState.name,
+            incidentEpisodeDescription: await Markdown.convertToHTML(incidentEpisode.description || "", MarkdownContentType.Email),
+            incidentEpisodeSeverity: incidentEpisode.incidentSeverity.name,
+            resourcesAffected: resourcesAffected,
+            rootCause: incidentEpisode.rootCause ||
+                "No root cause identified for this incident episode",
+            incidentsList: incidentsListHtml,
+            incidentsCount: incidents.length.toString(),
+            incidentEpisodeViewLink: (await IncidentEpisodeService.getEpisodeLinkInDashboard(incidentEpisode.projectId, incidentEpisode.id)).toString(),
+            acknowledgeIncidentEpisodeLink: new URL(httpProtocol, host, new Route(AppApiRoute.toString())
+                .addRoute(new UserOnCallLogTimeline().crudApiPath)
+                .addRoute("/acknowledge-page/" + userOnCallLogTimelineId.toString())).toString(),
+        };
+        const emailMessage = {
+            toEmail: to,
+            templateType: EmailTemplateType.AcknowledgeIncidentEpisode,
+            vars: vars,
+            subject: `ACTION REQUIRED: Incident Episode ${episodeNumber} created - ${incidentEpisode.title}`,
+        };
+        return emailMessage;
+    }
+    async startUserNotificationRulesExecution(userId, options) {
+        // add user notification log.
+        const userOnCallLog = new UserOnCallLog();
+        userOnCallLog.userId = userId;
+        userOnCallLog.projectId = options.projectId;
+        if (options.triggeredByIncidentId) {
+            userOnCallLog.triggeredByIncidentId = options.triggeredByIncidentId;
+        }
+        if (options.triggeredByAlertId) {
+            userOnCallLog.triggeredByAlertId = options.triggeredByAlertId;
+        }
+        if (options.triggeredByAlertEpisodeId) {
+            userOnCallLog.triggeredByAlertEpisodeId =
+                options.triggeredByAlertEpisodeId;
+        }
+        if (options.triggeredByIncidentEpisodeId) {
+            userOnCallLog.triggeredByIncidentEpisodeId =
+                options.triggeredByIncidentEpisodeId;
+        }
+        userOnCallLog.userNotificationEventType = options.userNotificationEventType;
+        if (options.onCallPolicyExecutionLogId) {
+            userOnCallLog.onCallDutyPolicyExecutionLogId =
+                options.onCallPolicyExecutionLogId;
+        }
         if (options.onCallPolicyId) {
             userOnCallLog.onCallDutyPolicyId = options.onCallPolicyId;
         }
@@ -1933,33 +3212,612 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
         });
     }
     async onBeforeCreate(createBy) {
-        if (!createBy.data.userCallId &&
-            !createBy.data.userCall &&
-            !createBy.data.userEmail &&
-            !createBy.data.userSms &&
-            !createBy.data.userSmsId &&
-            !createBy.data.userWhatsApp &&
-            !createBy.data.userWhatsAppId &&
-            !createBy.data.userTelegram &&
-            !createBy.data.userTelegramId &&
-            !createBy.data.userWebhook &&
-            !createBy.data.userWebhookId &&
-            !createBy.data.userEmailId &&
-            !createBy.data.userPushId &&
-            !createBy.data.userPush) {
-            throw new BadDataException("Call, SMS, WhatsApp, Telegram, Webhook, Email, or Push notification is required");
-        }
+        const carrier = createBy.data;
+        /*
+         * THE OWNERSHIP COLUMN IS REDUCED TO ONE SPELLING BEFORE ANYTHING READS IT,
+         * and it has to happen here, first, rather than inside the guard below.
+         *
+         * `userId` and `user` are two decorated members over one join column. Every
+         * check from this line down — the roster check, the method-ownership check,
+         * the create invariants, CreatePermission's own ownership gate, and the
+         * audit line after the write — asks "who does this row belong to", and each
+         * of them would otherwise have to answer it from two disagreeing sources.
+         * A payload carrying `user: { _id: <somebody else> }` and no `userId` is
+         * the concrete failure: the guard reads the scalar, finds nothing, falls
+         * back to the actor and validates a self-write, while TypeORM writes the
+         * relation's id and the row belongs to somebody else entirely.
+         *
+         * So: refuse a payload whose two spellings disagree, then fold the survivor
+         * into the scalar. After these two lines `createBy.data.userId` is the
+         * single, authoritative owner, and it is the value that will be persisted.
+         *
+         * Deliberately NOT behind the root short-circuit that guards the checks
+         * below. This is a reduction of the payload rather than a permission
+         * decision, and an internal caller writing an ambiguous row would be just
+         * as ambiguous a row.
+         */
+        UserNotificationRuleAdminService.assertOneRuleOwner(carrier);
+        UserNotificationRuleAdminService.collapseRuleOwnerRelationOnCreate(carrier);
+        await this.assertWriteIsPermittedForRuleOwner(createBy);
+        /*
+         * Ambiguity is refused, then removed — in that order, and only after the
+         * ownership guard above has had its say. A payload that names two different
+         * methods for one channel is a payload nobody legitimately sends, and one
+         * that names the same method twice is folded down to a single spelling so
+         * that the invariants below, and the ORM after them, are reading the one
+         * value that will actually be written.
+         */
+        UserNotificationRuleAdminService.assertOneMethodPerNotificationChannel(carrier);
+        UserNotificationRuleAdminService.collapseNotificationMethodRelationsOnCreate(carrier);
+        const hasNotificationMethod = UserNotificationRuleAdminService.carriesAnyNotificationMethod(carrier);
+        this.assertRuleIsCoherent({
+            isOptOut: Boolean(createBy.data.isOptOut),
+            hasNotificationMethod: hasNotificationMethod,
+        });
         return {
             createBy,
             carryForward: null,
         };
     }
+    /**
+     * The two invariants that decide whether a rule row means anything, enforced
+     * from one place because create and update can each break both of them.
+     *
+     * An opt-out row is how a user says "deliberately do not page me for this rule
+     * type at this severity". It carries the rule type and the severity and
+     * nothing else — a method on it would be self-contradictory (reach me here;
+     * also never reach me), and its whole purpose is to make silence explicit so
+     * that every OTHER zero-rule case can be treated as misconfiguration and
+     * rescued by the fallback. A rule that is NOT opt-out and names no method is
+     * the mirror failure: it looks like coverage on every screen and delivers
+     * nothing.
+     *
+     * The wording of both messages is load-bearing — the dashboard and the API
+     * docs quote them — so they are written once here rather than once per path.
+     */
+    assertRuleIsCoherent(data) {
+        if (data.isOptOut && data.hasNotificationMethod) {
+            throw new BadDataException("An opt-out notification rule cannot have a notification method. Remove the notification method, or turn off opt-out.");
+        }
+        if (!data.isOptOut && !data.hasNotificationMethod) {
+            throw new BadDataException("Call, SMS, WhatsApp, Telegram, Webhook, Email, or Push notification is required");
+        }
+    }
+    /**
+     * The create-path half of the on-behalf-of guards (audit R1 and R3).
+     *
+     * CreatePermission.checkCreateOwnership decides WHETHER a caller may name
+     * somebody else in the ownership column: CurrentUser-only callers may not, a
+     * caller holding a real role permission in the model's create list may. That
+     * check is deliberately permission-shaped and value-blind past that point —
+     * it has no notion of a project roster and no notion of what the rest of the
+     * row says. Both of those are checked here, because both of them are how the
+     * widened permission turns into somebody else's pages.
+     *
+     * Root and master-admin writes are exempt, matching the short-circuit at the
+     * top of CreatePermission. Every internal seeder (default rules on method
+     * verification, invitation acceptance, migrations) builds the ownership
+     * column and the method reference from one and the same userId, so the guard
+     * could only ever cost them a query per row; and the delivery-time check in
+     * executeNotificationRuleItem is the backstop that keeps even an internally
+     * written bad row from being acted on.
+     */
+    async assertWriteIsPermittedForRuleOwner(createBy) {
+        if (createBy.props.isRoot || createBy.props.isMasterAdmin) {
+            return;
+        }
+        /*
+         * `createBy.data.userId` alone is enough HERE, and only because
+         * onBeforeCreate has already folded the `user` relation into it. Read on
+         * its own — before that reduction existed — this line was a bypass: a
+         * payload spelling the owner as `user: { _id: <somebody else> }` left the
+         * scalar empty, fell through to props.userId, and every check below was
+         * answered about the actor while the row was written for the victim. If
+         * that fold is ever moved or removed, this line becomes wrong again.
+         *
+         * The fallback to props.userId is a different thing and stays: an omitted
+         * ownership column means "for myself". CreatePermission stamps props.userId
+         * onto it, but it does so AFTER this hook has run, so the value is not on
+         * the model yet and reading data.userId alone would treat every ordinary
+         * self-service create as an unowned row.
+         */
+        const ruleOwnerUserId = createBy.data.userId || createBy.props.userId;
+        if (!ruleOwnerUserId) {
+            throw new BadDataException("A notification rule must belong to a user. Sign in as the user this rule is for, or name the user the rule belongs to.");
+        }
+        const actorUserId = createBy.props.userId;
+        const isWritingForSomebodyElse = !actorUserId || actorUserId.toString() !== ruleOwnerUserId.toString();
+        if (isWritingForSomebodyElse) {
+            /*
+             * R1. Holding an administrative permission is a claim about a PROJECT, so
+             * it can only ever authorise writing for users of that project. Without
+             * this, one throwaway project where the caller is an admin would license
+             * writing notification rules for any user id in the installation.
+             */
+            await UserNotificationRuleAdminService.assertTargetUserIsProjectMember({
+                targetUserId: ruleOwnerUserId,
+                props: createBy.props,
+            });
+        }
+        /*
+         * R3, and note that it runs for a self-write too. "userId is me, but the
+         * email row I am pointing at is yours" is the mirror image of the hijack —
+         * it does not steal my pages, it copies them to your inbox — and it was
+         * writable long before this phase widened anything.
+         */
+        const references = UserNotificationRuleAdminService.collectNotificationMethodReferences(createBy.data);
+        await UserNotificationRuleAdminService.assertNotificationMethodsBelongToUser({
+            ownerUserId: ruleOwnerUserId,
+            references: references,
+        });
+    }
+    /*
+     * R6 for the create path.
+     *
+     * Keyed on the actor the SERVER resolved (props.userId) against the userId
+     * the row was actually PERSISTED with — read off createdItem, after
+     * CreatePermission has had its say and after the insert. Nothing in the
+     * request body reaches this comparison, because the body is the thing being
+     * audited.
+     */
+    async onCreateSuccess(onCreate, createdItem) {
+        const actorUserId = onCreate.createBy.props.userId;
+        const ruleOwnerUserId = createdItem.userId;
+        if (actorUserId &&
+            ruleOwnerUserId &&
+            actorUserId.toString() !== ruleOwnerUserId.toString()) {
+            await UserNotificationRuleAdminService.recordAdminRuleChange({
+                action: AuditLogAction.Create,
+                actorUserId: actorUserId,
+                ownerUserId: ruleOwnerUserId,
+                projectId: createdItem.projectId || onCreate.createBy.props.tenantId,
+                ruleId: createdItem.id,
+                after: createdItem,
+                notifyOwner: true,
+                props: onCreate.createBy.props,
+            });
+        }
+        return createdItem;
+    }
+    /**
+     * Narrow a caller-supplied query to the rows that caller is actually entitled
+     * to write, for use by the write hooks.
+     *
+     * WHY THIS EXISTS AT ALL. DatabaseService runs the hooks BEFORE the permission
+     * layer: _updateBy calls onBeforeUpdate and only then
+     * ModelPermission.checkUpdateQueryPermissions; _deleteBy calls onBeforeDelete
+     * and only then checkDeleteQueryPermission. So a hook that reads
+     * `updateBy.query` is reading the RAW request — no tenant predicate, no
+     * ownership predicate — and the hooks below read it with `isRoot` props on
+     * top, because the question they ask is a question about the database's state
+     * rather than about the caller's visibility. Left there, a caller could point
+     * the guard at rows in another project entirely: the guard would validate
+     * against them, the audit trail would name their owners, and the write itself
+     * would touch a completely different set.
+     *
+     * WHY NOT JUST CALL ModelPermission. That is the obvious fix and it is the
+     * wrong one. checkUpdateQueryPermissions does two jobs — it narrows the query
+     * AND it authorises the request — and running it here would run the second
+     * job twice, moving every table- and column-level rejection into the hook and
+     * duplicating the team lookups behind the tenant scope on every write. The
+     * hook does not need to authorise anything; _updateBy authorises it a few
+     * lines later and is the authority. What the hook needs is only that the row
+     * set it reasons about is no wider than the row set the write can reach.
+     *
+     * WHAT IS REPRODUCED, AND WHY THAT IS THE WHOLE OF IT. For this model the
+     * narrowing is exactly two predicates: the tenant column
+     * (TenantPermission.addTenantScopeToQuery for a member,
+     * PermissionUtil.addTenantScopeToQueryAsRoot on the delete path for root) and,
+     * when Permission.CurrentUser is the ONLY thing letting the caller through,
+     * the ownership column. Nothing else applies: UserNotificationRule declares no
+     * access-control column, is not an operational resource and has no
+     * @OwnedThrough, so addAccessControlIdsToQuery and addOwnedScopeToQuery are
+     * both no-ops on it. IF ANY OF THAT CHANGES ON THE MODEL, THIS MUST CHANGE
+     * WITH IT — a narrowing the permission layer applies and this does not is a
+     * guard validating rows the write never touches.
+     *
+     * Root and master-admin queries are returned untouched. They are entitled to
+     * every row, and narrowing them would make the guard read FEWER rows than the
+     * write reaches, which is the one direction it must never be wrong in.
+     */
+    narrowQueryToCallerEntitlement(query, props, requestType) {
+        if (props.isRoot || props.isMasterAdmin) {
+            return query;
+        }
+        const scopedQuery = Object.assign({}, query);
+        const tenantColumn = this.getModel().getTenantColumn();
+        if (tenantColumn && props.tenantId && !props.isMultiTenantRequest) {
+            scopedQuery[tenantColumn] = props.tenantId;
+        }
+        const userColumn = this.getModel().getUserColumn();
+        if (userColumn &&
+            props.userId &&
+            TenantPermission.isAccessGrantedOnlyByCurrentUser(this.modelType, props, requestType)) {
+            /*
+             * Set rather than merged. A CurrentUser-only caller whose query names
+             * somebody else is rejected outright by addCurrentUserScopeToQuery a
+             * moment from now, so the only thing that matters here is that the guard
+             * never reads rows that rejection would have protected.
+             */
+            scopedQuery[userColumn] = props.userId;
+        }
+        return scopedQuery;
+    }
+    /**
+     * The update-path half of R3, plus the read that R6 needs.
+     *
+     * The rule's owner is re-read FROM THE DATABASE here and never taken from
+     * updateBy.data. That is the whole point of the hook: on update the caller
+     * controls the body, so a userId in it is a claim ("this row is mine") made
+     * by exactly the party the guard exists to doubt. The persisted value is the
+     * only one that decides whose pages the row selects, so it is the only one
+     * worth comparing a method's owner against.
+     *
+     * The lookup runs with isRoot rather than the caller's own props on purpose.
+     * Scoping it to what the CALLER can READ would let a caller who cannot see a
+     * row edit it unchecked — the query would simply return nothing and the loop
+     * below would have nothing to reject. Read permission and write permission are
+     * different lists, and it is the write one that decides what this hook has to
+     * answer for.
+     *
+     * The QUERY, on the other hand, is narrowed first. Root props remove the
+     * caller's visibility from the answer; they must not also remove the caller's
+     * ENTITLEMENT from it, and this hook runs before ModelPermission has applied
+     * either. See narrowQueryToCallerEntitlement for why the narrowing is
+     * reproduced here rather than delegated.
+     *
+     * The rows are carried forward so onUpdateSuccess can audit against the
+     * owner as it stood BEFORE the write, without a second read and without
+     * trusting anything the request said.
+     */
+    async onBeforeUpdate(updateBy) {
+        var _a;
+        const patch = updateBy.data;
+        const references = UserNotificationRuleAdminService.collectNotificationMethodReferences(patch);
+        const isInternalWrite = Boolean(updateBy.props.isRoot || updateBy.props.isMasterAdmin);
+        /*
+         * Three reasons to read the affected rows, and only one of them is R3. An
+         * actor id means this write might be somebody editing somebody else's
+         * configuration, which R6 has to be able to report on even when no method FK
+         * is being touched; and a patch that touches `isOptOut` or any method column
+         * can break a row-level invariant that is only visible once the patch is
+         * laid over the row it is being applied to.
+         */
+        const touchesRuleCoherence = patch["isOptOut"] !== undefined ||
+            UserNotificationRuleAdminService.mentionsAnyNotificationMethodColumn(patch);
+        const needsAffectedRules = (references.length > 0 && !isInternalWrite) ||
+            touchesRuleCoherence ||
+            Boolean(updateBy.props.userId);
+        if (!needsAffectedRules) {
+            return {
+                updateBy,
+                carryForward: null,
+            };
+        }
+        const affectedRules = await this.findBy({
+            query: this.narrowQueryToCallerEntitlement(updateBy.query, updateBy.props, DatabaseRequestType.Update),
+            select: {
+                _id: true,
+                userId: true,
+                projectId: true,
+                ruleType: true,
+                notifyAfterMinutes: true,
+                isOptOut: true,
+                incidentSeverityId: true,
+                alertSeverityId: true,
+                userEmailId: true,
+                userSmsId: true,
+                userCallId: true,
+                userWhatsAppId: true,
+                userTelegramId: true,
+                userPushId: true,
+                userWebhookId: true,
+            },
+            limit: LIMIT_MAX,
+            skip: 0,
+            props: {
+                isRoot: true,
+                ignoreHooks: true,
+            },
+        });
+        if (references.length > 0 && !isInternalWrite) {
+            /*
+             * One validation per DISTINCT owner rather than per row. A bulk update
+             * across twenty of one user's rules asks the same question twenty times,
+             * and each question costs a lookup per referenced method.
+             */
+            const validatedOwnerIds = new Set();
+            for (const affectedRule of affectedRules) {
+                const ownerKey = ((_a = affectedRule.userId) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a.toString()) || "";
+                if (validatedOwnerIds.has(ownerKey)) {
+                    continue;
+                }
+                validatedOwnerIds.add(ownerKey);
+                await UserNotificationRuleAdminService.assertNotificationMethodsBelongToUser({
+                    ownerUserId: affectedRule.userId,
+                    references: references,
+                });
+            }
+        }
+        /*
+         * Ambiguity is refused here as it is on create, but NOT folded away. The
+         * relation members are `update: []` on this model while the `*Id` members
+         * are open to an administrator, so rewriting one spelling into the other
+         * would smuggle a column write past the very ColumnPermission check that
+         * runs immediately after this hook. Refusal leaves nothing for the ORM to
+         * choose between without moving a value across a permission boundary.
+         */
+        UserNotificationRuleAdminService.assertOneMethodPerNotificationChannel(patch);
+        if (touchesRuleCoherence) {
+            /*
+             * The create-time invariants, re-checked per affected row.
+             *
+             * They were enforced only on create, which left update as a way to reach
+             * the states create refuses: flip `isOptOut` on a rule that carries an
+             * email and you have a row that says both "reach me here" and "never
+             * reach me"; null the last method on a rule that is not opt-out and you
+             * have a row that looks like coverage on every screen and delivers
+             * nothing — indistinguishable, to the fallback, from a deliberate choice
+             * to stay silent. Neither is visible from the patch alone, which is why
+             * this waits until the affected rows have been read.
+             */
+            for (const affectedRule of affectedRules) {
+                const methodIdsAfterPatch = UserNotificationRuleAdminService.getNotificationMethodIdsAfterPatch({
+                    patch: patch,
+                    currentRow: affectedRule,
+                });
+                const isOptOutAfterPatch = patch["isOptOut"] !== undefined
+                    ? Boolean(patch["isOptOut"])
+                    : Boolean(affectedRule.isOptOut);
+                this.assertRuleIsCoherent({
+                    isOptOut: isOptOutAfterPatch,
+                    hasNotificationMethod: methodIdsAfterPatch.length > 0,
+                });
+            }
+        }
+        return {
+            updateBy,
+            carryForward: {
+                affectedRules: affectedRules,
+            },
+        };
+    }
+    /*
+     * R6 for the update path.
+     *
+     * Every row whose PERSISTED owner is somebody other than the actor gets an
+     * audit entry; the owner gets at most one mail no matter how many of their
+     * rules one request touched, because twenty copies of "an admin changed your
+     * rules" is a message people learn to delete rather than read.
+     *
+     * `updatedItemIds` is the set of rows the write ACTUALLY touched, and the
+     * carried-forward rows are filtered down to it. The two can differ: the hook
+     * read every row the (narrowed) query matched, while _updateBy applies the
+     * caller's own skip/limit and drops rows that were hard-deleted between the
+     * two. Reporting an unchanged row would put a change in the audit trail that
+     * never happened and mail somebody about it.
+     */
+    async onUpdateSuccess(onUpdate, updatedItemIds) {
+        var _a;
+        const actorUserId = onUpdate.updateBy.props.userId;
+        if (!actorUserId) {
+            return onUpdate;
+        }
+        const affectedRules = ((_a = onUpdate.carryForward) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a.affectedRules) || [];
+        const updatedIds = new Set(updatedItemIds.map((id) => {
+            return id.toString();
+        }));
+        await this.reportAdministrativeChange({
+            action: AuditLogAction.Update,
+            actorUserId: actorUserId,
+            rules: affectedRules.filter((rule) => {
+                return Boolean(rule.id && updatedIds.has(rule.id.toString()));
+            }),
+            updatedFields: onUpdate.updateBy.data,
+            props: onUpdate.updateBy.props,
+        });
+        return onUpdate;
+    }
+    /**
+     * R6, factored out because create, update and delete all owe the same debt.
+     *
+     * One audit entry per ROW, because that is what an investigator reconstructs
+     * a timeline from, and at most one mail per PERSON, because one request that
+     * touches twenty of somebody's rules is still one thing that happened to
+     * them.
+     *
+     * Rules the actor owns are skipped: configuring your own paging is not an
+     * administrative act and does not need announcing to yourself.
+     */
+    async reportAdministrativeChange(data) {
+        const notifiedOwnerIds = new Set();
+        for (const rule of data.rules) {
+            const ruleOwnerUserId = rule.userId;
+            if (!ruleOwnerUserId ||
+                ruleOwnerUserId.toString() === data.actorUserId.toString()) {
+                continue;
+            }
+            const ownerKey = ruleOwnerUserId.toString();
+            const isFirstRuleForThisOwner = !notifiedOwnerIds.has(ownerKey);
+            notifiedOwnerIds.add(ownerKey);
+            await UserNotificationRuleAdminService.recordAdminRuleChange({
+                action: data.action,
+                actorUserId: data.actorUserId,
+                ownerUserId: ruleOwnerUserId,
+                projectId: rule.projectId || data.props.tenantId,
+                ruleId: rule.id,
+                before: rule,
+                updatedFields: data.updatedFields,
+                notifyOwner: isFirstRuleForThisOwner,
+                props: data.props,
+            });
+        }
+    }
+    /**
+     * The delete-path guard, and the reason it is a guard at all.
+     *
+     * Deleting somebody's notification rules is the most destructive of the three
+     * write verbs and, until this hook existed, the only unguarded one: the model
+     * opened `delete` to the administrative permissions, and nothing here noticed.
+     * An admin — or anyone who had got hold of an admin session — could remove a
+     * responder's entire paging configuration and leave no record and no warning.
+     * The person it happened to would find out during an incident.
+     *
+     * What a delete guard can and cannot be. There is no R3 analogue: a deleted
+     * row routes nothing anywhere, so there is no method-versus-owner pair left to
+     * disagree. Nor is there an R1 analogue: refusing to delete the rules of
+     * somebody who is no longer on the roster would block exactly the cleanup an
+     * admin performs after a member leaves. What is left, and what actually
+     * matters, is EVIDENTIARY — establish from the database who owned these rows
+     * before they cease to exist, because after the write nothing can answer that
+     * question and the request body was never allowed to.
+     *
+     * The rows must be read here rather than in onDeleteSuccess for the same
+     * reason: _deleteBy hands the success hook only the ids it deleted, and by
+     * then the rows are gone.
+     *
+     * The query is narrowed first. onBeforeDelete runs BEFORE
+     * ModelPermission.checkDeleteQueryPermission, exactly as onBeforeUpdate runs
+     * before its update counterpart, so the raw query carries neither the tenant
+     * predicate nor the ownership predicate — see narrowQueryToCallerEntitlement.
+     * Without it, a member could point this read at another project's rules and
+     * have their owners written into the audit trail and mailed a warning about a
+     * deletion that never touched them.
+     */
+    async onBeforeDelete(deleteBy) {
+        if (!deleteBy.props.userId) {
+            /*
+             * No actor, nothing to attribute. Workers and migrations delete rules
+             * (project teardown, method removal cascades) and an "an administrator
+             * deleted your rules" mail for every one of those is how the message
+             * that matters gets filtered away.
+             */
+            return {
+                deleteBy,
+                carryForward: null,
+            };
+        }
+        const deletedRules = await this.findBy({
+            query: this.narrowQueryToCallerEntitlement(deleteBy.query, deleteBy.props, DatabaseRequestType.Delete),
+            select: {
+                _id: true,
+                userId: true,
+                projectId: true,
+                ruleType: true,
+                notifyAfterMinutes: true,
+                isOptOut: true,
+                incidentSeverityId: true,
+                alertSeverityId: true,
+                userEmailId: true,
+                userSmsId: true,
+                userCallId: true,
+                userWhatsAppId: true,
+                userTelegramId: true,
+                userPushId: true,
+                userWebhookId: true,
+            },
+            limit: LIMIT_MAX,
+            skip: 0,
+            props: {
+                isRoot: true,
+                ignoreHooks: true,
+            },
+        });
+        return {
+            deleteBy,
+            carryForward: {
+                deletedRules: deletedRules,
+            },
+        };
+    }
+    /*
+     * R6 for the delete path.
+     *
+     * Keyed the same way as the other two: the actor the SERVER resolved against
+     * the owner the DATABASE recorded, read before the rows were removed. The
+     * snapshot carried forward is now the only description of what those rules
+     * were, so it is what the audit entry is built from.
+     */
+    async onDeleteSuccess(onDelete, deletedItemIds) {
+        var _a;
+        const actorUserId = onDelete.deleteBy.props.userId;
+        if (!actorUserId) {
+            return onDelete;
+        }
+        const deletedRules = ((_a = onDelete.carryForward) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a.deletedRules) || [];
+        const deletedIds = new Set(deletedItemIds.map((id) => {
+            return id.toString();
+        }));
+        await this.reportAdministrativeChange({
+            action: AuditLogAction.Delete,
+            actorUserId: actorUserId,
+            /*
+             * Only rows the delete actually removed. The hook read every row the
+             * narrowed query matched; _deleteBy then applied the caller's own
+             * skip/limit on top, so the two sets are not always the same and a
+             * warning about a rule that still exists is a false alarm.
+             */
+            rules: deletedRules.filter((rule) => {
+                return Boolean(rule.id && deletedIds.has(rule.id.toString()));
+            }),
+            props: onDelete.deleteBy.props,
+        });
+        return onDelete;
+    }
     async addDefaultNotificationRulesForVerifiedMethod(data) {
         const { projectId, userId, notificationMethod } = data;
-        await this.createIncidentOnCallRules(projectId, userId, notificationMethod);
-        await this.createAlertOnCallRules(projectId, userId, notificationMethod);
-        await this.createSingleRule(projectId, userId, notificationMethod, NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_ALERT_EPISODE);
-        await this.createSingleRule(projectId, userId, notificationMethod, NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT_EPISODE);
+        /*
+         * Read each severity list once and reuse it for both rule types it drives.
+         * Incident severities scope both ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT and
+         * ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT_EPISODE; alert severities do the same for their
+         * two.
+         */
+        const incidentSeverityIds = await this.getIncidentSeverityIds(projectId);
+        const alertSeverityIds = await this.getAlertSeverityIds(projectId);
+        await this.createSeverityScopedRules({
+            projectId,
+            userId,
+            notificationMethod,
+            ruleType: NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT,
+            severityIds: incidentSeverityIds,
+            severityColumn: "incidentSeverityId",
+        });
+        await this.createSeverityScopedRules({
+            projectId,
+            userId,
+            notificationMethod,
+            ruleType: NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_ALERT,
+            severityIds: alertSeverityIds,
+            severityColumn: "alertSeverityId",
+        });
+        /*
+         * The two episode rule types are severity-scoped as well, and used not to
+         * be. UserOnCallLogService counts episode rules filtered by a concrete
+         * severity id, and the episode rule pages in User Settings scope their
+         * tables the same way — so a NULL-severity episode rule matched no page and
+         * appeared in no table. Users got "defaults" that were unreachable and
+         * invisible at the same time.
+         */
+        await this.createSeverityScopedRules({
+            projectId,
+            userId,
+            notificationMethod,
+            ruleType: NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_ALERT_EPISODE,
+            severityIds: alertSeverityIds,
+            severityColumn: "alertSeverityId",
+        });
+        await this.createSeverityScopedRules({
+            projectId,
+            userId,
+            notificationMethod,
+            ruleType: NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT_EPISODE,
+            severityIds: incidentSeverityIds,
+            severityColumn: "incidentSeverityId",
+        });
+        /*
+         * These two are about the user's shift, not about anything that fired, so
+         * they legitimately have no severity and stay single rules.
+         */
         await this.createSingleRule(projectId, userId, notificationMethod, NotificationRuleType.WHEN_USER_GOES_ON_CALL);
         await this.createSingleRule(projectId, userId, notificationMethod, NotificationRuleType.WHEN_USER_GOES_OFF_CALL);
     }
@@ -2011,7 +3869,7 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
         }
         return query;
     }
-    async createIncidentOnCallRules(projectId, userId, notificationMethod) {
+    async getIncidentSeverityIds(projectId) {
         const incidentSeverities = await IncidentSeverityService.findBy({
             query: {
                 projectId,
@@ -2025,33 +3883,11 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                 _id: true,
             },
         });
-        for (const incidentSeverity of incidentSeverities) {
-            const existingRule = await this.findOneBy({
-                query: Object.assign(Object.assign({ projectId,
-                    userId }, this.getNotificationMethodQuery(notificationMethod)), { incidentSeverityId: incidentSeverity.id, ruleType: NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT }),
-                props: {
-                    isRoot: true,
-                },
-            });
-            if (existingRule) {
-                continue;
-            }
-            const rule = new Model();
-            rule.projectId = projectId;
-            rule.userId = userId;
-            this.applyNotificationMethod(rule, notificationMethod);
-            rule.incidentSeverityId = incidentSeverity.id;
-            rule.notifyAfterMinutes = 0;
-            rule.ruleType = NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_INCIDENT;
-            await this.create({
-                data: rule,
-                props: {
-                    isRoot: true,
-                },
-            });
-        }
+        return incidentSeverities.map((severity) => {
+            return severity.id;
+        });
     }
-    async createAlertOnCallRules(projectId, userId, notificationMethod) {
+    async getAlertSeverityIds(projectId) {
         const alertSeverities = await AlertSeverityService.findBy({
             query: {
                 projectId,
@@ -2065,10 +3901,20 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                 _id: true,
             },
         });
-        for (const alertSeverity of alertSeverities) {
+        return alertSeverities.map((severity) => {
+            return severity.id;
+        });
+    }
+    /*
+     * Seed one rule per severity for a severity-scoped rule type, skipping any
+     * (method, severity, ruleType) triple the user already has. The duplicate
+     * check is keyed on the same columns the write sets, so re-verifying a method
+     * never doubles a user's rules — and therefore never doubles their pages.
+     */
+    async createSeverityScopedRules(data) {
+        for (const severityId of data.severityIds) {
             const existingRule = await this.findOneBy({
-                query: Object.assign(Object.assign({ projectId,
-                    userId }, this.getNotificationMethodQuery(notificationMethod)), { alertSeverityId: alertSeverity.id, ruleType: NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_ALERT }),
+                query: Object.assign(Object.assign({ projectId: data.projectId, userId: data.userId }, this.getNotificationMethodQuery(data.notificationMethod)), { [data.severityColumn]: severityId, ruleType: data.ruleType }),
                 props: {
                     isRoot: true,
                 },
@@ -2077,12 +3923,12 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
                 continue;
             }
             const rule = new Model();
-            rule.projectId = projectId;
-            rule.userId = userId;
-            this.applyNotificationMethod(rule, notificationMethod);
-            rule.alertSeverityId = alertSeverity.id;
+            rule.projectId = data.projectId;
+            rule.userId = data.userId;
+            this.applyNotificationMethod(rule, data.notificationMethod);
+            rule[data.severityColumn] = severityId;
             rule.notifyAfterMinutes = 0;
-            rule.ruleType = NotificationRuleType.ON_CALL_EXECUTED_ALERT;
+            rule.ruleType = data.ruleType;
             await this.create({
                 data: rule,
                 props: {
@@ -2147,6 +3993,728 @@ export class Service extends DatabaseService {
             },
         });
     }
+    /**
+     * What this user would lose by deleting these notification rules.
+     *
+     * Ask this BEFORE deleting. It reads and returns; it writes nothing and
+     * refuses nothing, and the caller is expected to go ahead and delete anyway
+     * if that is what the human wants after reading it.
+     *
+     * The rule ids are INTERSECTED with the rules this user actually has in this
+     * project rather than trusted — the read is scoped by (projectId, userId) in
+     * the query itself, so an id belonging to somebody else, or to another
+     * project, simply matches nothing and contributes nothing to the answer.
+     * That is the only place row scoping can come from: a column access list
+     * cannot restrict WHICH ROWS a caller sees, because Permission.CurrentUser is
+     * auto-granted to every authenticated caller and so never means "only my own
+     * row".
+     *
+     * An empty id list is legal and returns a zero-deletion impact, which is
+     * still worth something: it carries this user's responder status, their
+     * reachability and whether the project's fallback is on.
+     *
+     * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+     * NOT WIRED TODAY. READ THIS BEFORE ASSUMING IT GUARDS ANYTHING.
+     *
+     * This method and getNotificationMethodDeletionImpact below have NO production
+     * caller. The delete guard that actually ships is client-side, in
+     * App/FeatureSet/Dashboard/src/Components/NotificationMethods/NotificationMethod.tsx
+     * (useNotificationMethodDeleteGuard + DeletionImpactModal), and it computes the
+     * same answer in the browser from the deleting user's OWN rules.
+     *
+     * That is adequate for the case that ships: a person deleting their own
+     * notification method or their own rule can read all of their own rules, and
+     * one user's rule set is small and bounded. It is NOT adequate for an
+     * administrator computing the impact of deleting somebody ELSE's
+     * configuration, which is what this exists for - and that is Phase 3, which is
+     * not merged.
+     *
+     * So this is deliberately-retained, currently-unreachable code, kept because
+     * the admin path needs exactly it and because it holds one thing the browser
+     * copy cannot: it reads EVERY rule for the user rather than a page, and it
+     * derives a rule's severity from the column its RULE TYPE dictates rather than
+     * whichever column happens to be populated.
+     *
+     * Retaining unreachable code is a real cost and this comment is the price of
+     * it: nothing here enforces anything server-side today. A deletion is not
+     * validated, refused or even observed by this service. If you are reading this
+     * because you assumed the server checked, it does not.
+     * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+     */
+    async getRuleDeletionImpact(data) {
+        const targetRuleIds = new Set(data.notificationRuleIds.map((ruleId) => {
+            return ruleId.toString();
+        }));
+        return this.computeDeletionImpact({
+            projectId: data.projectId,
+            userId: data.userId,
+            isBeingDeleted: (rule) => {
+                var _a;
+                return targetRuleIds.has(((_a = rule.id) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a.toString()) || "");
+            },
+            deletedMethod: undefined,
+        });
+    }
+    /**
+     * What this user would lose by deleting one notification method.
+     *
+     * This is the dangerous one. Deleting a method is not a small write: every
+     * method foreign key on UserNotificationRule is onDelete: "CASCADE", and each
+     * method service deletes the same rows itself in onBeforeDelete, so removing
+     * one phone number takes every rule that pointed at it with it. Somebody
+     * tidying up an old number has no reason to expect that, and nothing on the
+     * screen tells them.
+     *
+     * The method row is looked up scoped by projectId, and the userId comes from
+     * the ROW rather than from the caller. Both matter: the projectId scope is
+     * what stops a caller probing method ids from other projects, and taking the
+     * userId from the row is what stops a caller asking for one user's method
+     * under another user's name and getting an answer that belongs to neither.
+     */
+    async getNotificationMethodDeletionImpact(data) {
+        const method = await this.resolveNotificationMethod(data);
+        return this.computeDeletionImpact({
+            projectId: data.projectId,
+            userId: method.userId,
+            isBeingDeleted: (rule) => {
+                var _a;
+                return (((_a = this.getRuleMethodId(rule, data.methodType)) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a.toString()) ===
+                    data.methodId.toString());
+            },
+            deletedMethod: method,
+        });
+    }
+    /**
+     * Read the method row being deleted, scoped to the project, and reduce it to
+     * the three things the preview needs: whose it is, which channel it is on,
+     * and whether it was ever verified.
+     *
+     * Webhooks report isVerified: true with no column behind it. UserWebhook has
+     * no verification concept at all — its presence IS the whole test, which is
+     * how the fallback treats it and how readiness reports it — so calling it
+     * unverified here would tell somebody that deleting the one channel
+     * guaranteed to work costs them nothing.
+     */
+    async resolveNotificationMethod(data) {
+        const query = {
+            _id: data.methodId,
+            projectId: data.projectId,
+        };
+        const props = {
+            isRoot: true,
+        };
+        let row = null;
+        let isVerified = false;
+        if (data.methodType === ReadinessMethodType.Email) {
+            row = await UserEmailService.findOneBy({
+                query: query,
+                select: { _id: true, userId: true, isVerified: true },
+                props: props,
+            });
+            isVerified = Boolean(row === null || row === void 0 ? void 0 : row.isVerified);
+        }
+        else if (data.methodType === ReadinessMethodType.SMS) {
+            row = await UserSmsService.findOneBy({
+                query: query,
+                select: { _id: true, userId: true, isVerified: true },
+                props: props,
+            });
+            isVerified = Boolean(row === null || row === void 0 ? void 0 : row.isVerified);
+        }
+        else if (data.methodType === ReadinessMethodType.Call) {
+            row = await UserCallService.findOneBy({
+                query: query,
+                select: { _id: true, userId: true, isVerified: true },
+                props: props,
+            });
+            isVerified = Boolean(row === null || row === void 0 ? void 0 : row.isVerified);
+        }
+        else if (data.methodType === ReadinessMethodType.Push) {
+            row = await UserPushService.findOneBy({
+                query: query,
+                select: { _id: true, userId: true, isVerified: true },
+                props: props,
+            });
+            isVerified = Boolean(row === null || row === void 0 ? void 0 : row.isVerified);
+        }
+        else if (data.methodType === ReadinessMethodType.WhatsApp) {
+            row = await UserWhatsAppService.findOneBy({
+                query: query,
+                select: { _id: true, userId: true, isVerified: true },
+                props: props,
+            });
+            isVerified = Boolean(row === null || row === void 0 ? void 0 : row.isVerified);
+        }
+        else if (data.methodType === ReadinessMethodType.Telegram) {
+            row = await UserTelegramService.findOneBy({
+                query: query,
+                select: { _id: true, userId: true, isVerified: true },
+                props: props,
+            });
+            isVerified = Boolean(row === null || row === void 0 ? void 0 : row.isVerified);
+        }
+        else if (data.methodType === ReadinessMethodType.Webhook) {
+            row = await UserWebhookService.findOneBy({
+                query: query,
+                select: { _id: true, userId: true },
+                props: props,
+            });
+            isVerified = Boolean(row);
+        }
+        else {
+            throw new BadDataException(`${data.methodType} is not a notification method`);
+        }
+        if (!row || !row.userId) {
+            throw new BadDataException("Notification method not found");
+        }
+        return {
+            methodType: data.methodType,
+            userId: row.userId,
+            isVerified: isVerified,
+        };
+    }
+    /**
+     * The foreign key a rule uses to point at a method of this channel. One
+     * lookup table rather than seven inline comparisons, so a rule can never be
+     * tested against the wrong column — which would report a WhatsApp rule as
+     * surviving the deletion of the SMS number it does not use, or worse, the
+     * reverse.
+     */
+    getRuleMethodId(rule, methodType) {
+        if (methodType === ReadinessMethodType.Email) {
+            return rule.userEmailId;
+        }
+        if (methodType === ReadinessMethodType.SMS) {
+            return rule.userSmsId;
+        }
+        if (methodType === ReadinessMethodType.Call) {
+            return rule.userCallId;
+        }
+        if (methodType === ReadinessMethodType.Push) {
+            return rule.userPushId;
+        }
+        if (methodType === ReadinessMethodType.WhatsApp) {
+            return rule.userWhatsAppId;
+        }
+        if (methodType === ReadinessMethodType.Telegram) {
+            return rule.userTelegramId;
+        }
+        if (methodType === ReadinessMethodType.Webhook) {
+            return rule.userWebhookId;
+        }
+        return undefined;
+    }
+    /**
+     * The before/after picture both entry points share.
+     *
+     * Deliberately shaped as "read every rule this user has, then ask a predicate
+     * which of them go" rather than "count the rules that go". Coverage is a
+     * property of what is LEFT, so the rules that survive are as load-bearing as
+     * the ones that do not: a cell with two rules on two methods loses nothing
+     * when one of them goes, and the only way to know that is to have read both.
+     */
+    async computeDeletionImpact(data) {
+        const cellStates = new Map();
+        const handoffStates = new Map();
+        let rulesDeletedCount = 0;
+        /*
+         * Folded as each page arrives rather than accumulated and folded after.
+         * Every rule collapses into one of a few dozen cells, so holding the rows
+         * would mean carrying the whole table in memory to produce a map orders of
+         * magnitude smaller — and the one project where that matters is exactly the
+         * project where this read takes more than one page.
+         */
+        const foldRule = (rule) => {
+            const isDeleted = data.isBeingDeleted(rule);
+            if (isDeleted) {
+                rulesDeletedCount++;
+            }
+            /*
+             * `isOptOut === true`, never `=== false`. The column is nullable and was
+             * added long after these rows started existing, so it is NULL on every
+             * rule in every existing install; testing for false would classify all of
+             * them as neither rules nor opt-outs and report a fully configured user
+             * as having nothing to lose. This is the exact dual of the predicate
+             * readiness folds with, and it has to stay that way.
+             */
+            const isOptOut = rule.isOptOut === true;
+            const scope = PAGING_RULE_TYPE_SCOPES.find((candidate) => {
+                return candidate.ruleType === rule.ruleType;
+            });
+            if (scope) {
+                const severityId = rule[scope.severityColumn];
+                /*
+                 * A severity-scoped rule with a NULL severity matches no page at
+                 * runtime, so it covers no cell and losing it costs nothing. Counting
+                 * it would promise coverage that never existed.
+                 */
+                if (!severityId) {
+                    return;
+                }
+                const key = `${scope.ruleType}|${severityId.toString()}`;
+                const state = cellStates.get(key) || {
+                    ruleType: scope.ruleType,
+                    severityKind: scope.severityKind,
+                    severityId: severityId.toString(),
+                    rulesBefore: 0,
+                    rulesRemoved: 0,
+                    hasOptOut: false,
+                };
+                if (isOptOut) {
+                    /*
+                     * Only a SURVIVING opt-out makes the silence deliberate. Deleting the
+                     * opt-out along with the last rule leaves neither, and that cell is a
+                     * real gap however it was created.
+                     */
+                    if (!isDeleted) {
+                        state.hasOptOut = true;
+                    }
+                }
+                else {
+                    state.rulesBefore++;
+                    if (isDeleted) {
+                        state.rulesRemoved++;
+                    }
+                }
+                cellStates.set(key, state);
+                return;
+            }
+            const handoffType = HANDOFF_RULE_TYPES.find((candidate) => {
+                return candidate === rule.ruleType;
+            });
+            if (!handoffType) {
+                // Not a rule type anything pages on. It covers nothing, so it loses nothing.
+                return;
+            }
+            const handoffState = handoffStates.get(handoffType) || {
+                rulesBefore: 0,
+                rulesRemoved: 0,
+                hasOptOut: false,
+            };
+            if (isOptOut) {
+                if (!isDeleted) {
+                    handoffState.hasOptOut = true;
+                }
+            }
+            else {
+                handoffState.rulesBefore++;
+                if (isDeleted) {
+                    handoffState.rulesRemoved++;
+                }
+            }
+            handoffStates.set(handoffType, handoffState);
+        };
+        const isTruncated = await this.readEveryNotificationRuleForUser({
+            projectId: data.projectId,
+            userId: data.userId,
+            consume: (rows) => {
+                for (const rule of rows) {
+                    foldRule(rule);
+                }
+            },
+        });
+        const lostCells = Array.from(cellStates.values()).filter((state) => {
+            return (state.rulesBefore > 0 &&
+                state.rulesRemoved === state.rulesBefore &&
+                !state.hasOptOut);
+        });
+        const handoffNotificationsLost = HANDOFF_RULE_TYPES.filter((ruleType) => {
+            const state = handoffStates.get(ruleType);
+            return Boolean(state &&
+                state.rulesBefore > 0 &&
+                state.rulesRemoved === state.rulesBefore &&
+                !state.hasOptOut);
+        });
+        /*
+         * Severity names are read only when something was actually lost. The common
+         * case for this call is "nothing you care about goes", and that case should
+         * not cost two extra round trips to name cells nobody will be shown.
+         */
+        const severityNames = await this.loadSeverityNamesForCells(data.projectId, lostCells);
+        const coverageLost = this.buildCoverageLossCells(lostCells, severityNames);
+        /*
+         * "Is this person on call anywhere" comes from OnCallReadinessService and
+         * from nowhere else. getReadinessForUsers rather than getReadinessForUser
+         * because the plural form OMITS a user who is not a member of the project
+         * instead of throwing for them: somebody being removed from a project is
+         * one of the perfectly legitimate reasons their methods are being deleted,
+         * and that must produce an honest "unknown" rather than an exception in
+         * front of an admin doing housekeeping.
+         */
+        const readinessList = await OnCallReadinessService.getReadinessForUsers([data.userId], data.projectId);
+        const readiness = readinessList[0];
+        const verifiedMethods = ((readiness === null || readiness === void 0 ? void 0 : readiness.methods) || []).filter((method) => {
+            return method.isVerified;
+        });
+        const remainingVerifiedMethods = [
+            ...verifiedMethods,
+        ];
+        if (data.deletedMethod && data.deletedMethod.isVerified) {
+            /*
+             * Readiness returns one entry per method ROW, and the row being deleted is
+             * identified by its CHANNEL rather than by its id. Removing exactly ONE
+             * entry of that channel is what makes the count right for a user with two
+             * verified SMS numbers who is deleting one of them: the other survives,
+             * and so does the entry.
+             *
+             * ReadinessMethod does now carry methodId, so an exact match is available;
+             * matching on the channel is kept because it is equivalent HERE and not
+             * because the id is missing. The only consumer of this list is
+             * resolveReachability, which reads its LENGTH and its methodTypes and
+             * nothing else, so which of two same-channel entries is dropped cannot
+             * change the answer. Anything added below that cares about a specific row
+             * must match on methodId instead — this equivalence is a property of the
+             * current consumer, not a licence.
+             */
+            const index = remainingVerifiedMethods.findIndex((method) => {
+                var _a;
+                return method.methodType === ((_a = data.deletedMethod) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a.methodType);
+            });
+            if (index >= 0) {
+                remainingVerifiedMethods.splice(index, 1);
+            }
+        }
+        const reachability = this.resolveReachability(readiness, remainingVerifiedMethods);
+        const project = await ProjectService.findOneById({
+            id: data.projectId,
+            select: {
+                _id: true,
+                disableOnCallNotificationFallback: true,
+            },
+            props: {
+                isRoot: true,
+            },
+        });
+        /*
+         * Read exactly as readiness reads it, including what a missing project row
+         * means. Agreeing with the readiness page matters more here than picking
+         * the louder default independently would: two surfaces that disagree about
+         * whether pages are dropped teach people to trust neither.
+         */
+        const isFallbackEnabled = !(project === null || project === void 0 ? void 0 : project.disableOnCallNotificationFallback);
+        return {
+            projectId: data.projectId,
+            userId: data.userId,
+            isOnCallResponder: Boolean(readiness && readiness.reachedVia.length > 0),
+            reachedVia: (readiness === null || readiness === void 0 ? void 0 : readiness.reachedVia) || [],
+            rulesDeletedCount: rulesDeletedCount,
+            coverageLost: coverageLost,
+            handoffNotificationsLost: handoffNotificationsLost,
+            reachability: reachability,
+            verifiedMethodCountAfterDeletion: remainingVerifiedMethods.length,
+            isFallbackEnabled: isFallbackEnabled,
+            isTruncated: isTruncated,
+            warnings: this.buildDeletionWarnings({
+                deletedMethod: data.deletedMethod,
+                rulesDeletedCount: rulesDeletedCount,
+                readiness: readiness,
+                reachability: reachability,
+                remainingVerifiedMethods: remainingVerifiedMethods,
+                coverageLost: coverageLost,
+                handoffNotificationsLost: handoffNotificationsLost,
+                isFallbackEnabled: isFallbackEnabled,
+                isTruncated: isTruncated,
+            }),
+        };
+    }
+    /**
+     * Every notification rule this user has in this project, one page at a time.
+     *
+     * Returns whether the read was TRUNCATED rather than throwing or silently
+     * stopping. A truncated read here is not symmetric in its consequences:
+     * unread rules that would have survived make this over-warn, which costs a
+     * moment of an admin's attention, while unread rules that would have been
+     * DELETED make it under-warn, which is the whole failure this feature exists
+     * to prevent. Either way the caller is told.
+     *
+     * The sort is `_id` ascending because OFFSET paging over a query with no
+     * total order can return one row twice and skip another — and the default
+     * sort would be `createdAt DESC`, which is emphatically not unique for a
+     * user whose default rules were all written in one transaction.
+     */
+    async readEveryNotificationRuleForUser(data) {
+        let skip = 0;
+        for (let page = 0; page < MAX_DELETION_IMPACT_PAGES; page++) {
+            const rows = await this.findBy({
+                query: {
+                    projectId: data.projectId,
+                    userId: data.userId,
+                },
+                select: {
+                    _id: true,
+                    ruleType: true,
+                    incidentSeverityId: true,
+                    alertSeverityId: true,
+                    isOptOut: true,
+                    userEmailId: true,
+                    userSmsId: true,
+                    userCallId: true,
+                    userPushId: true,
+                    userWhatsAppId: true,
+                    userTelegramId: true,
+                    userWebhookId: true,
+                },
+                sort: {
+                    _id: SortOrder.Ascending,
+                },
+                limit: DELETION_IMPACT_PAGE_SIZE,
+                skip: skip,
+                props: {
+                    isRoot: true,
+                },
+            });
+            data.consume(rows);
+            if (rows.length < DELETION_IMPACT_PAGE_SIZE) {
+                return false;
+            }
+            skip += rows.length;
+        }
+        logger.error(`UserNotificationRuleService stopped reading notification rules for user ${data.userId.toString()} in project ${data.projectId.toString()} after ${MAX_DELETION_IMPACT_PAGES} pages of ${DELETION_IMPACT_PAGE_SIZE} rows. The deletion impact for this user is INCOMPLETE and may understate what the deletion removes.`);
+        return true;
+    }
+    /**
+     * Display names for the severities of the cells that are actually lost, in
+     * the project's own severity order.
+     *
+     * Not paged, unlike the rule read: severity lists are a handful of rows per
+     * project by construction (they are a UI-managed enumeration, not user data),
+     * and LIMIT_PER_PROJECT is three orders of magnitude past any of them.
+     */
+    async loadSeverityNamesForCells(projectId, lostCells) {
+        const severityNames = new Map();
+        const needsIncident = lostCells.some((cell) => {
+            return cell.severityKind === SeverityKind.Incident;
+        });
+        const needsAlert = lostCells.some((cell) => {
+            return cell.severityKind === SeverityKind.Alert;
+        });
+        if (needsIncident) {
+            const incidentSeverities = await IncidentSeverityService.findBy({
+                query: {
+                    projectId: projectId,
+                },
+                select: {
+                    _id: true,
+                    name: true,
+                },
+                sort: {
+                    order: SortOrder.Ascending,
+                },
+                limit: LIMIT_PER_PROJECT,
+                skip: 0,
+                props: {
+                    isRoot: true,
+                },
+            });
+            incidentSeverities.forEach((severity, index) => {
+                if (!severity.id) {
+                    return;
+                }
+                severityNames.set(this.severityNameKey(SeverityKind.Incident, severity.id.toString()), {
+                    name: severity.name || "Unnamed Severity",
+                    rank: index,
+                });
+            });
+        }
+        if (needsAlert) {
+            const alertSeverities = await AlertSeverityService.findBy({
+                query: {
+                    projectId: projectId,
+                },
+                select: {
+                    _id: true,
+                    name: true,
+                },
+                sort: {
+                    order: SortOrder.Ascending,
+                },
+                limit: LIMIT_PER_PROJECT,
+                skip: 0,
+                props: {
+                    isRoot: true,
+                },
+            });
+            alertSeverities.forEach((severity, index) => {
+                if (!severity.id) {
+                    return;
+                }
+                severityNames.set(this.severityNameKey(SeverityKind.Alert, severity.id.toString()), {
+                    name: severity.name || "Unnamed Severity",
+                    rank: index,
+                });
+            });
+        }
+        return severityNames;
+    }
+    severityNameKey(kind, severityId) {
+        /*
+         * Keyed by KIND as well as by id. Incident and alert severities are
+         * different tables with independently generated ids, and a map keyed on the
+         * id alone would let one name a cell of the other kind if the two ever
+         * collided — a one-in-a-uuid event that would be indistinguishable from a
+         * mislabelled warning if it happened.
+         */
+        return `${kind}|${severityId}`;
+    }
+    buildCoverageLossCells(lostCells, severityNames) {
+        const ordered = [...lostCells].sort((a, b) => {
+            const ruleTypeDifference = this.pagingRuleTypeRank(a.ruleType) -
+                this.pagingRuleTypeRank(b.ruleType);
+            if (ruleTypeDifference !== 0) {
+                return ruleTypeDifference;
+            }
+            /*
+             * Severity order, not alphabetical. "Sev1, Sev2, Sev3" happens to sort
+             * both ways; "Critical, High, Low" does not, and a warning that lists
+             * severities in an order the user has never seen them in reads as a
+             * different set of severities.
+             */
+            return (this.severityRank(a, severityNames) -
+                this.severityRank(b, severityNames));
+        });
+        return ordered.map((cell) => {
+            const ref = severityNames.get(this.severityNameKey(cell.severityKind, cell.severityId));
+            return {
+                ruleType: cell.ruleType,
+                severityId: new ObjectID(cell.severityId),
+                severityName: ref === null || ref === void 0 ? void 0 : ref.name,
+                rulesRemoved: cell.rulesRemoved,
+            };
+        });
+    }
+    pagingRuleTypeRank(ruleType) {
+        const index = PAGING_RULE_TYPE_SCOPES.findIndex((scope) => {
+            return scope.ruleType === ruleType;
+        });
+        return index < 0 ? PAGING_RULE_TYPE_SCOPES.length : index;
+    }
+    severityRank(cell, severityNames) {
+        const ref = severityNames.get(this.severityNameKey(cell.severityKind, cell.severityId));
+        /*
+         * A severity we could not name sorts last rather than first. It is the one
+         * entry whose sentence will read "this severity", and burying it under the
+         * ones that read properly costs nothing; leading with it looks like a bug.
+         */
+        return ref ? ref.rank : Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER;
+    }
+    resolveReachability(readiness, remainingVerifiedMethods) {
+        if (!readiness) {
+            return PostDeletionReachability.Unknown;
+        }
+        /*
+         * Checked first, and it is not merely a nicety of wording. Readiness says
+         * NotReachable when the user has no USABLE method — which includes the case
+         * where every verified method they own is on a channel the project has
+         * switched off — so this branch is also what keeps the branches below from
+         * promising "still reachable" on the strength of a verified method that
+         * nothing can send on.
+         */
+        if (readiness.status === ReadinessStatus.NotReachable) {
+            return PostDeletionReachability.AlreadyNotReachable;
+        }
+        if (remainingVerifiedMethods.length === 0) {
+            return PostDeletionReachability.NotReachable;
+        }
+        const unswitchableChannels = channelsWithNoProjectSwitch();
+        const hasUnswitchableChannel = remainingVerifiedMethods.some((method) => {
+            return unswitchableChannels.includes(method.methodType);
+        });
+        if (hasUnswitchableChannel) {
+            return PostDeletionReachability.Reachable;
+        }
+        return PostDeletionReachability.DependsOnProjectSettings;
+    }
+    /**
+     * The sentences a human reads in the confirmation dialog, most consequential
+     * first.
+     *
+     * Every line names a specific thing that is lost AND what happens because of
+     * it, which is the same contract OnCallReadinessService.buildReasons keeps
+     * and for the same reason: "no rule for Sev4" is a shrug, "no rule for Sev4,
+     * and those pages are dropped" is a decision. Nothing here says "are you
+     * sure?" — the caller owns the question, and this owns the facts it is asked
+     * about.
+     */
+    buildDeletionWarnings(data) {
+        const warnings = [];
+        /*
+         * The cascade goes first because it is the part nobody clicked. Everything
+         * below is a consequence of it, and a list that started with the
+         * consequences would read as though the notification rules were being
+         * deleted for no reason at all.
+         */
+        if (data.deletedMethod && data.rulesDeletedCount > 0) {
+            warnings.push(`Deleting this ${data.deletedMethod.methodType} notification method also deletes ${data.rulesDeletedCount} notification ${data.rulesDeletedCount === 1 ? "rule" : "rules"} that use it - a notification rule cannot outlive the method it sends on.`);
+        }
+        if (data.reachability === PostDeletionReachability.NotReachable) {
+            warnings.push("This is the last verified notification method on this account - after it there is nothing left to page this user on, and the on-call fallback has nothing to fall back to either.");
+        }
+        if (!data.readiness) {
+            warnings.push("Whether this user is on call could not be determined - they may no longer be a member of this project.");
+        }
+        else if (data.readiness.reachedVia.length > 0) {
+            const sources = data.readiness.reachedVia.map((source) => {
+                return responderSourceProse(source);
+            });
+            warnings.push(`This user is on call in this project (${sources.join(", ")}), so anything lost here is a page that does not arrive.`);
+        }
+        else {
+            /*
+             * Said out loud rather than left as silence. "Not on call" is the one
+             * answer that makes this whole dialog safe to click through, and an admin
+             * who has to infer it from the absence of a warning will infer it wrongly
+             * at least once.
+             */
+            warnings.push("This user is not on any on-call policy right now, so nothing here can cost a page today - it will if they are ever added to one.");
+        }
+        for (const scope of PAGING_RULE_TYPE_SCOPES) {
+            const severityNames = data.coverageLost
+                .filter((cell) => {
+                return cell.ruleType === scope.ruleType;
+            })
+                .map((cell) => {
+                return cell.severityName || "this severity";
+            });
+            if (severityNames.length === 0) {
+                continue;
+            }
+            /*
+             * One sentence per rule type listing its severities, not one per cell. A
+             * user deleting a method that carried all their default rules would
+             * otherwise be handed one line per (rule type x severity) — sixteen
+             * near-identical sentences that nobody reads to the end of.
+             */
+            const subject = `After this, no rule covers ${severityNames.join(", ")} ${scope.subjectNoun}`;
+            if (data.isFallbackEnabled) {
+                warnings.push(`${subject} - those pages fall back to whatever this user has verified, which is not what they configured`);
+            }
+            else {
+                warnings.push(`${subject} - those pages are dropped, because on-call fallback is disabled for this project`);
+            }
+        }
+        if (data.handoffNotificationsLost.includes(NotificationRuleType.WHEN_USER_GOES_ON_CALL)) {
+            warnings.push("This user will no longer be told when they go on call.");
+        }
+        if (data.handoffNotificationsLost.includes(NotificationRuleType.WHEN_USER_GOES_OFF_CALL)) {
+            warnings.push("This user will no longer be told when they go off call.");
+        }
+        if (data.reachability === PostDeletionReachability.AlreadyNotReachable) {
+            warnings.push("This user already has no usable notification method, so nothing can page them today either - this deletion is not what breaks it.");
+        }
+        if (data.reachability === PostDeletionReachability.DependsOnProjectSettings) {
+            const channels = [];
+            for (const method of data.remainingVerifiedMethods) {
+                if (!channels.includes(method.methodType)) {
+                    channels.push(method.methodType);
+                }
+            }
+            warnings.push(`Every verified method left on this account is on a channel the project can switch off (${channels.join(", ")}) - check On-Call > Readiness to confirm this user can still be paged.`);
+        }
+        if (data.isTruncated) {
+            warnings.push("This preview is incomplete - there are more notification rules on this account than it could read, so the real loss may be larger than what is listed here.");
+        }
+        return warnings;
+    }
 }
 __decorate([
     CaptureSpan(),
@@ -2154,6 +4722,12 @@ __decorate([
     __metadata("design:paramtypes", [ObjectID, Object]),
     __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
 ], Service.prototype, "executeNotificationRuleItem", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Object]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], Service.prototype, "executeFallbackNotification", null);
 __decorate([
     CaptureSpan(),
     __metadata("design:type", Function),
@@ -2178,6 +4752,14 @@ __decorate([
         ObjectID]),
     __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
 ], Service.prototype, "generateCallTemplateForAlertEpisodeCreated", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Phone,
+        IncidentEpisode,
+        ObjectID]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], Service.prototype, "generateCallTemplateForIncidentEpisodeCreated", null);
 __decorate([
     CaptureSpan(),
     __metadata("design:type", Function),
@@ -2202,6 +4784,14 @@ __decorate([
         ObjectID]),
     __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
 ], Service.prototype, "generateSmsTemplateForAlertEpisodeCreated", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Phone,
+        IncidentEpisode,
+        ObjectID]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], Service.prototype, "generateSmsTemplateForIncidentEpisodeCreated", null);
 __decorate([
     CaptureSpan(),
     __metadata("design:type", Function),
@@ -2223,6 +4813,13 @@ __decorate([
         ObjectID]),
     __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
 ], Service.prototype, "generateTelegramBodyForAlertEpisodeCreated", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [IncidentEpisode,
+        ObjectID]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], Service.prototype, "generateTelegramBodyForIncidentEpisodeCreated", null);
 __decorate([
     CaptureSpan(),
     __metadata("design:type", Function),
@@ -2247,6 +4844,14 @@ __decorate([
         ObjectID]),
     __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
 ], Service.prototype, "generateWhatsAppTemplateForAlertEpisodeCreated", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Phone,
+        IncidentEpisode,
+        ObjectID]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], Service.prototype, "generateWhatsAppTemplateForIncidentEpisodeCreated", null);
 __decorate([
     CaptureSpan(),
     __metadata("design:type", Function),
@@ -2271,6 +4876,14 @@ __decorate([
         ObjectID]),
     __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
 ], Service.prototype, "generateEmailTemplateForAlertEpisodeCreated", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Email,
+        IncidentEpisode,
+        ObjectID]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], Service.prototype, "generateEmailTemplateForIncidentEpisodeCreated", null);
 __decorate([
     CaptureSpan(),
     __metadata("design:type", Function),
@@ -2289,6 +4902,36 @@ __decorate([
     __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Object]),
     __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
 ], Service.prototype, "onBeforeCreate", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Object, Model]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], Service.prototype, "onCreateSuccess", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Object]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], Service.prototype, "onBeforeUpdate", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Object, Array]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], Service.prototype, "onUpdateSuccess", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Object]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], Service.prototype, "onBeforeDelete", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Object, Array]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], Service.prototype, "onDeleteSuccess", null);
 __decorate([
     CaptureSpan(),
     __metadata("design:type", Function),
@@ -2303,5 +4946,17 @@ __decorate([
         Email]),
     __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
 ], Service.prototype, "addDefaultNotificationRuleForUser", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Object]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], Service.prototype, "getRuleDeletionImpact", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Object]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], Service.prototype, "getNotificationMethodDeletionImpact", null);
 export default new Service();
 //# sourceMappingURL=UserNotificationRuleService.js.map