@oneuptime/common 12.0.34 → 13.0.1

package/build/dist/Server/Utils/CodeRepository/GitHub/GitHubWebhookHandler.js

@@ -0,0 +1,661 @@
+var __decorate = (this && this.__decorate) || function (decorators, target, key, desc) {
+    var c = arguments.length, r = c < 3 ? target : desc === null ? desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(target, key) : desc, d;
+    if (typeof Reflect === "object" && typeof Reflect.decorate === "function") r = Reflect.decorate(decorators, target, key, desc);
+    else for (var i = decorators.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) if (d = decorators[i]) r = (c < 3 ? d(r) : c > 3 ? d(target, key, r) : d(target, key)) || r;
+    return c > 3 && r && Object.defineProperty(target, key, r), r;
+};
+var __metadata = (this && this.__metadata) || function (k, v) {
+    if (typeof Reflect === "object" && typeof Reflect.metadata === "function") return Reflect.metadata(k, v);
+};
+import logger from "../../Logger";
+import GitHubCommandType, { GitHubCommandSurface, isConversationalCommand, } from "../../../../Types/CodeRepository/GitHubCommand";
+import GlobalCache from "../../../Infrastructure/GlobalCache";
+import GitHubAgentTaskTrigger from "./GitHubAgentTaskTrigger";
+import GitHubCommandAuthorizer, { GitHubAuthorizationOutcome, } from "./GitHubCommandAuthorizer";
+import GitHubCommandParser from "./GitHubCommandParser";
+import GitHubConversation, { GitHubReaction, } from "./GitHubConversation";
+import GitHubReplyComposer from "./GitHubReplyComposer";
+import GitHubRunReply from "./GitHubRunReply";
+import GitHubWebhookEvents, { DEFAULT_GITHUB_TRIGGER_LABEL, GitHubWebhookEvent, } from "./GitHubWebhookEvents";
+import CaptureSpan from "../../Telemetry/CaptureSpan";
+/*
+ * The interactive half of the GitHub App: everything between a verified
+ * webhook and a queued agent run.
+ *
+ * Kept out of the express route on purpose. The route's job is signature
+ * verification and a 200; this file's job is the decision tree, and a decision
+ * tree that can only be exercised through an HTTP request does not get tested
+ * properly.
+ *
+ * Two rules run through all of it:
+ *
+ *   - It NEVER throws at the caller. GitHub retries a delivery that did not
+ *     get a 2xx, so an exception escaping here becomes a redelivery storm of
+ *     the exact payload that just failed. Everything is caught and logged.
+ *
+ *   - A command that was understood always gets a visible response — a
+ *     reaction, a comment, or both. The one deliberate exception is a command
+ *     from someone without write access, which gets a reaction and no comment;
+ *     see GitHubCommandAuthorizer for why replying there would be a mistake.
+ */
+// How long a processed delivery id is remembered, to swallow redeliveries.
+const DELIVERY_DEDUPE_SECONDS = 60 * 60 * 6;
+const DELIVERY_DEDUPE_NAMESPACE = "github-webhook-delivery";
+const NOT_HANDLED = (outcome) => {
+    return { handled: false, outcome: outcome };
+};
+export default class GitHubWebhookHandler {
+    /*
+     * Has this exact delivery been processed before?
+     *
+     * GitHub redelivers on any non-2xx and on manual replay, and a duplicate
+     * delivery must not produce a duplicate comment. The per-conversation run
+     * dedupe already stops a duplicate RUN, but it does not stop a duplicate
+     * acknowledgement, and two "on it" comments on one request reads as a bug.
+     *
+     * A cache outage answers "not seen": the run dedupe still holds, so the
+     * worst case is a repeated comment, and refusing to work while Redis is
+     * down would be a much larger outage than the one being avoided.
+     */
+    static async isDuplicateDelivery(deliveryId) {
+        if (!deliveryId) {
+            return false;
+        }
+        try {
+            const claimed = await GlobalCache.setStringIfNotExists(DELIVERY_DEDUPE_NAMESPACE, deliveryId, "1", { expiresInSeconds: DELIVERY_DEDUPE_SECONDS });
+            return !claimed;
+        }
+        catch (error) {
+            logger.debug(`Could not check the GitHub webhook delivery fence, continuing: ${error}`);
+            return false;
+        }
+    }
+    static async handleEvent(data) {
+        try {
+            if (!GitHubWebhookHandler.isInteractiveEvent(data.event)) {
+                return NOT_HANDLED("event-not-interactive");
+            }
+            if (await GitHubWebhookHandler.isDuplicateDelivery(data.deliveryId)) {
+                logger.debug(`Ignoring a redelivered GitHub webhook (${data.deliveryId}).`);
+                return NOT_HANDLED("duplicate-delivery");
+            }
+            switch (data.event) {
+                case GitHubWebhookEvent.IssueComment:
+                case GitHubWebhookEvent.PullRequestReviewComment:
+                case GitHubWebhookEvent.PullRequestReview:
+                    return await GitHubWebhookHandler.handleMention(data);
+                case GitHubWebhookEvent.Issues:
+                    return await GitHubWebhookHandler.handleIssuesEvent(data);
+                case GitHubWebhookEvent.PullRequest:
+                    return await GitHubWebhookHandler.handlePullRequestEvent(data);
+                default:
+                    return NOT_HANDLED("event-not-interactive");
+            }
+        }
+        catch (error) {
+            /*
+             * Swallowed on purpose — see the note at the top. A failure here has
+             * already been logged with its context; propagating it would turn one
+             * bad payload into an endless redelivery loop.
+             */
+            logger.error(`Failed to handle GitHub webhook event "${data.event}" (${data.deliveryId}):`);
+            logger.error(error);
+            /*
+             * Give the fence back. It is claimed before any work is attempted, so a
+             * transient failure — a database blip, a 502 from GitHub — would
+             * otherwise be permanent: GitHub's redelivery of the SAME delivery id
+             * arrives inside the six-hour window and is swallowed as a duplicate,
+             * and the command is lost with the user still looking at their comment.
+             *
+             * Releasing it risks a duplicate ACKNOWLEDGEMENT if the failure happened
+             * after one was posted. That is the better failure: the per-conversation
+             * run guard still stops a duplicate run, so the cost is one extra
+             * comment rather than a command that silently never happened.
+             */
+            await GitHubWebhookHandler.releaseDelivery(data.deliveryId);
+            return NOT_HANDLED("error");
+        }
+    }
+    /*
+     * Release a delivery fence so GitHub's retry of that delivery is processed.
+     * Only used on the failure path — see the note in handleEvent.
+     */
+    static async releaseDelivery(deliveryId) {
+        if (!deliveryId) {
+            return;
+        }
+        try {
+            await GlobalCache.deleteKey(DELIVERY_DEDUPE_NAMESPACE, deliveryId);
+        }
+        catch (error) {
+            logger.debug(`Could not release the GitHub webhook delivery fence for ${deliveryId}: ${error}`);
+        }
+    }
+    static isInteractiveEvent(event) {
+        return (event === GitHubWebhookEvent.IssueComment ||
+            event === GitHubWebhookEvent.Issues ||
+            event === GitHubWebhookEvent.PullRequest ||
+            event === GitHubWebhookEvent.PullRequestReview ||
+            event === GitHubWebhookEvent.PullRequestReviewComment);
+    }
+    /*
+     * A comment somewhere in an issue or pull request conversation: the plain
+     * comment stream, an inline review comment on the diff, or the body of a
+     * submitted review. All three are the same interaction — a human wrote
+     * something that may mention the app — so they share a path.
+     */
+    static async handleMention(data) {
+        var _a;
+        const action = GitHubWebhookEvents.getAction(data.payload);
+        /*
+         * `created` covers a new comment; `submitted` a new review; `edited` a
+         * comment someone went back and added the mention to, which is a real way
+         * people ask. Every other action (deleted, dismissed) is not a request.
+         */
+        if (action !== "created" && action !== "edited" && action !== "submitted") {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("action-not-actionable");
+        }
+        const commentContainer = data.payload["comment"] ||
+            data.payload["review"];
+        const body = (_a = commentContainer === null || commentContainer === void 0 ? void 0 : commentContainer["body"]) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a.toString();
+        if (!body) {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("no-comment-body");
+        }
+        /*
+         * On issue_comment GitHub sends the same event for both surfaces; on the
+         * review events the surface is always a pull request.
+         */
+        const issue = data.payload["issue"];
+        const pullRequest = data.payload["pull_request"];
+        const isPullRequest = Boolean(pullRequest) || GitHubWebhookEvents.isPullRequestIssue(issue);
+        const conversationNumber = GitHubWebhookEvents.getNumber(issue || pullRequest);
+        if (conversationNumber === null) {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("no-conversation-number");
+        }
+        return GitHubWebhookHandler.runCommandFromText({
+            payload: data.payload,
+            deliveryId: data.deliveryId,
+            body: body,
+            surface: isPullRequest
+                ? GitHubCommandSurface.PullRequest
+                : GitHubCommandSurface.Issue,
+            conversationNumber: conversationNumber,
+            triggerCommentId: (commentContainer === null || commentContainer === void 0 ? void 0 : commentContainer["id"]) || undefined,
+        });
+    }
+    /*
+     * An issue assigned to the app's bot user, or labelled with the
+     * repository's trigger label.
+     *
+     * Both exist because GitHub does not offer one reliable way to hand work to
+     * an app. Assignment is the gesture people reach for first, but a GitHub
+     * App's bot user cannot be assigned from the web UI on most repositories, so
+     * a label is the mechanism that always works. Supporting both costs one
+     * branch and means the feature is never mysteriously unavailable.
+     */
+    static async handleIssuesEvent(data) {
+        var _a, _b, _c, _d, _e, _f;
+        const action = GitHubWebhookEvents.getAction(data.payload);
+        const issue = data.payload["issue"];
+        const issueNumber = GitHubWebhookEvents.getNumber(issue);
+        if (issueNumber === null) {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("no-issue-number");
+        }
+        if (GitHubWebhookEvents.isPullRequestIssue(issue)) {
+            // Pull requests arrive on the `pull_request` event; ignore the alias.
+            return NOT_HANDLED("issue-is-pull-request");
+        }
+        /*
+         * Everything cheap first. Most `issues` deliveries are opened / edited /
+         * closed, and resolveContext costs a database read plus a GitHub
+         * permission call — spending that on every issue anyone touches in every
+         * connected repository is how an integration eats its own rate limit.
+         */
+        if (action !== "assigned" && action !== "labeled") {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("action-not-actionable");
+        }
+        if (action === "assigned") {
+            const assigneeLogin = (_b = (_a = data.payload["assignee"]) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a["login"]) === null || _b === void 0 ? void 0 : _b.toString();
+            const appSlug = await GitHubConversation.getAppSlug();
+            if (!appSlug ||
+                !assigneeLogin ||
+                assigneeLogin.toLowerCase() !==
+                    GitHubConversation.toBotLogin(appSlug).toLowerCase()) {
+                return NOT_HANDLED("assignee-is-not-this-app");
+            }
+        }
+        const context = await GitHubWebhookHandler.resolveContext(data.payload);
+        if (!context) {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("unresolvable-context");
+        }
+        /*
+         * The label check needs the repository, so it is the one that has to wait
+         * until after resolveContext — the trigger label is per-repository
+         * configuration.
+         */
+        if (action === "labeled") {
+            const triggerLabel = ((_d = (_c = context.authorization.codeRepository) === null || _c === void 0 ? void 0 : _c.gitHubTriggerLabel) === null || _d === void 0 ? void 0 : _d.trim()) ||
+                DEFAULT_GITHUB_TRIGGER_LABEL;
+            const addedLabel = (_f = (_e = data.payload["label"]) === null || _e === void 0 ? void 0 : _e["name"]) === null || _f === void 0 ? void 0 : _f.toString();
+            if (!addedLabel ||
+                addedLabel.trim().toLowerCase() !== triggerLabel.toLowerCase()) {
+                return NOT_HANDLED("label-is-not-the-trigger-label");
+            }
+        }
+        /*
+         * Only now — with an assignment to this app or its own trigger label
+         * confirmed — is the app addressed, and only now is a comment about the
+         * switch being off something the person did anything to deserve.
+         */
+        if (GitHubWebhookHandler.areCommandsDisabled(context)) {
+            return GitHubWebhookHandler.replyCommandsDisabled({
+                context: context,
+                conversationNumber: issueNumber,
+            });
+        }
+        /*
+         * Assignment and labelling carry no words, so the issue speaks for
+         * itself. The empty instruction is honest: the agent is told to read the
+         * issue rather than handed a sentence nobody wrote.
+         */
+        return GitHubWebhookHandler.startRun({
+            context: context,
+            command: { commandType: GitHubCommandType.Implement, instruction: "" },
+            surface: GitHubCommandSurface.Issue,
+            conversationNumber: issueNumber,
+            triggerCommentId: undefined,
+            deliveryId: data.deliveryId,
+        });
+    }
+    // A review requested from the app's bot user on a pull request.
+    static async handlePullRequestEvent(data) {
+        var _a, _b;
+        if (GitHubWebhookEvents.getAction(data.payload) !== "review_requested") {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("action-not-actionable");
+        }
+        const pullRequestNumber = GitHubWebhookEvents.getNumber(data.payload["pull_request"]);
+        if (pullRequestNumber === null) {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("no-pull-request-number");
+        }
+        const requestedLogin = (_b = (_a = data.payload["requested_reviewer"]) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a["login"]) === null || _b === void 0 ? void 0 : _b.toString();
+        const appSlug = await GitHubConversation.getAppSlug();
+        if (!appSlug ||
+            !requestedLogin ||
+            requestedLogin.toLowerCase() !==
+                GitHubConversation.toBotLogin(appSlug).toLowerCase()) {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("reviewer-is-not-this-app");
+        }
+        const context = await GitHubWebhookHandler.resolveContext(data.payload);
+        if (!context) {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("unresolvable-context");
+        }
+        if (GitHubWebhookHandler.areCommandsDisabled(context)) {
+            return GitHubWebhookHandler.replyCommandsDisabled({
+                context: context,
+                conversationNumber: pullRequestNumber,
+            });
+        }
+        return GitHubWebhookHandler.startRun({
+            context: context,
+            command: { commandType: GitHubCommandType.Review, instruction: "" },
+            surface: GitHubCommandSurface.PullRequest,
+            conversationNumber: pullRequestNumber,
+            triggerCommentId: undefined,
+            deliveryId: data.deliveryId,
+        });
+    }
+    /*
+     * Parse a comment, authorize its author, and either answer it or start work.
+     */
+    static async runCommandFromText(data) {
+        const appSlug = await GitHubConversation.getAppSlug();
+        if (!appSlug) {
+            logger.warn("A GitHub comment arrived but this instance cannot resolve its own app slug — set GITHUB_APP_NAME or check the app credentials.");
+            return NOT_HANDLED("no-app-slug");
+        }
+        const command = GitHubCommandParser.parse({
+            body: data.body,
+            appSlug: appSlug,
+            surface: data.surface,
+        });
+        if (!command) {
+            // By far the common case: an ordinary comment that never mentions us.
+            return NOT_HANDLED("no-mention");
+        }
+        const context = await GitHubWebhookHandler.resolveContext(data.payload);
+        if (!context) {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("unresolvable-context");
+        }
+        if (GitHubWebhookHandler.areCommandsDisabled(context)) {
+            return GitHubWebhookHandler.replyCommandsDisabled({
+                context: context,
+                conversationNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+            });
+        }
+        if (!GitHubCommandParser.isSupportedOnSurface({
+            commandType: command.commandType,
+            surface: data.surface,
+        })) {
+            await GitHubWebhookHandler.reply({
+                context: context,
+                conversationNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+                body: GitHubReplyComposer.unsupportedOnSurface({
+                    commandType: command.commandType,
+                    appSlug: appSlug,
+                }),
+            });
+            return { handled: true, outcome: "unsupported-on-surface" };
+        }
+        if (isConversationalCommand(command.commandType)) {
+            return GitHubWebhookHandler.answerConversationalCommand({
+                context: context,
+                command: command,
+                appSlug: appSlug,
+                conversationNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+            });
+        }
+        return GitHubWebhookHandler.startRun({
+            context: context,
+            command: command,
+            surface: data.surface,
+            conversationNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+            triggerCommentId: data.triggerCommentId,
+            deliveryId: data.deliveryId,
+        });
+    }
+    /*
+     * help / status / cancel. None of them costs an agent run, so none of them
+     * is subject to the fix-run budget — and all of them are answered even when
+     * the repository has commands switched off, because "why is nothing
+     * happening?" is exactly the question those replies exist to answer.
+     */
+    static async answerConversationalCommand(data) {
+        const codeRepository = data.context.authorization.codeRepository;
+        if (data.command.commandType === GitHubCommandType.Help) {
+            await GitHubWebhookHandler.reply({
+                context: data.context,
+                conversationNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+                body: GitHubReplyComposer.help({ appSlug: data.appSlug }),
+            });
+            return { handled: true, outcome: "help" };
+        }
+        if (!(codeRepository === null || codeRepository === void 0 ? void 0 : codeRepository.id) || !codeRepository.projectId) {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("no-repository-for-conversational-command");
+        }
+        if (data.command.commandType === GitHubCommandType.Status) {
+            const runs = await GitHubAgentTaskTrigger.findNonTerminalRunsForConversation({
+                projectId: codeRepository.projectId,
+                codeRepositoryId: codeRepository.id,
+                conversationNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+            });
+            await GitHubWebhookHandler.reply({
+                context: data.context,
+                conversationNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+                body: GitHubReplyComposer.status({
+                    runDescriptions: runs.map((run) => {
+                        return GitHubRunReply.describeLiveRun(run);
+                    }),
+                    runUrlBase: GitHubRunReply.buildProjectRunsUrl(codeRepository.projectId),
+                }),
+            });
+            return { handled: true, outcome: "status" };
+        }
+        const cancelledCount = await GitHubAgentTaskTrigger.cancelRunsForConversation({
+            projectId: codeRepository.projectId,
+            codeRepositoryId: codeRepository.id,
+            conversationNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+        });
+        await GitHubWebhookHandler.reply({
+            context: data.context,
+            conversationNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+            body: GitHubReplyComposer.cancelled({ cancelledCount: cancelledCount }),
+        });
+        return { handled: true, outcome: "cancel" };
+    }
+    /*
+     * Queue the agent run and acknowledge it in the thread.
+     *
+     * A Revise or Review reads the pull request first, because the run needs the
+     * head branch it must push to — captured HERE, at trigger time, so that a
+     * force-push between the comment and the agent claiming the work cannot
+     * silently redirect it at a different branch.
+     */
+    static async startRun(data) {
+        var _a, _b;
+        const codeRepository = data.context.authorization.codeRepository;
+        if (!(codeRepository === null || codeRepository === void 0 ? void 0 : codeRepository.id) || !codeRepository.projectId) {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("no-repository");
+        }
+        const taskType = GitHubAgentTaskTrigger.getTaskTypeForCommand(data.command.commandType);
+        if (!taskType) {
+            return NOT_HANDLED("command-has-no-task-type");
+        }
+        const isPullRequestCommand = data.surface === GitHubCommandSurface.PullRequest;
+        let pullRequestHeadRefName = undefined;
+        let isPullRequestFromFork = false;
+        if (isPullRequestCommand) {
+            const pullRequest = await GitHubConversation.getPullRequestDetails({
+                installationId: data.context.installationId,
+                organizationName: data.context.repository.organizationName,
+                repositoryName: data.context.repository.repositoryName,
+                pullRequestNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+            });
+            /*
+             * A merged or closed pull request has nothing left to revise, and a
+             * review of it would land on a thread nobody is reading. Say so rather
+             * than spending a run to discover it.
+             */
+            if (pullRequest.state !== "open") {
+                await GitHubWebhookHandler.reply({
+                    context: data.context,
+                    conversationNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+                    body: GitHubReplyComposer.refusal({
+                        reason: "This pull request is already closed, so there is nothing for me to do here.",
+                    }),
+                });
+                return { handled: true, outcome: "pull-request-not-open" };
+            }
+            isPullRequestFromFork = GitHubConversation.isFromFork({
+                headRepositoryFullName: pullRequest.headRepositoryFullName,
+                organizationName: data.context.repository.organizationName,
+                repositoryName: data.context.repository.repositoryName,
+            });
+            /*
+             * A fork's branch is in a repository this installation cannot write to.
+             * Reviewing one is fine — reviews are written on the BASE repository's
+             * pull request — but revising one is not, and finding that out after a
+             * clone and a full agent run would waste the budget and end in a
+             * confusing push error. Refuse up front and say why.
+             */
+            if (data.command.commandType === GitHubCommandType.Revise &&
+                isPullRequestFromFork) {
+                await GitHubWebhookHandler.reply({
+                    context: data.context,
+                    conversationNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+                    body: GitHubReplyComposer.refusal({
+                        reason: "This pull request comes from a fork, so I cannot push to its branch. I can still review it — ask me to review instead, or push the branch to this repository if you want me to revise it.",
+                    }),
+                });
+                return { handled: true, outcome: "pull-request-from-fork" };
+            }
+            /*
+             * Pin the head branch only when it is actually reachable. For a fork it
+             * is not, and pinning it would send the review after a branch that does
+             * not exist here — which the clone would quietly answer with the default
+             * branch. Leaving it unset says "work from the base", which is the
+             * honest description of what a fork review can do.
+             */
+            if (!isPullRequestFromFork) {
+                pullRequestHeadRefName = pullRequest.headRefName;
+            }
+        }
+        const github = Object.assign(Object.assign(Object.assign(Object.assign(Object.assign(Object.assign({ codeRepositoryId: codeRepository.id.toString(), installationId: data.context.installationId, organizationName: data.context.repository.organizationName, repositoryName: data.context.repository.repositoryName, commandType: data.command.commandType, instruction: data.command.instruction }, (isPullRequestCommand
+            ? { pullRequestNumber: data.conversationNumber }
+            : { issueNumber: data.conversationNumber })), (pullRequestHeadRefName
+            ? { pullRequestHeadRefName: pullRequestHeadRefName }
+            : {})), (isPullRequestCommand
+            ? { isPullRequestFromFork: isPullRequestFromFork }
+            : {})), (data.triggerCommentId
+            ? { triggerCommentId: data.triggerCommentId }
+            : {})), (data.context.sender
+            ? { triggeredByLogin: data.context.sender.login }
+            : {})), (data.deliveryId ? { webhookDeliveryId: data.deliveryId } : {}));
+        let run;
+        try {
+            run = await GitHubAgentTaskTrigger.enqueueGitHubCodeFixRun({
+                projectId: codeRepository.projectId,
+                taskType: taskType,
+                github: github,
+            });
+        }
+        catch (error) {
+            /*
+             * "Already working on this" and "over the daily budget" are both normal
+             * answers, not failures — and both are useless unless the person who
+             * asked can read them, so they go into the thread verbatim.
+             */
+            await GitHubWebhookHandler.reply({
+                context: data.context,
+                conversationNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+                body: GitHubReplyComposer.refusal({
+                    reason: error instanceof Error
+                        ? error.message
+                        : "I could not start that just now.",
+                }),
+            });
+            return { handled: true, outcome: "refused" };
+        }
+        const acknowledgementCommentId = await GitHubRunReply.acknowledge({
+            aiRunId: run.id,
+            projectId: codeRepository.projectId,
+            projectName: data.context.authorization.projectName,
+            github: github,
+        });
+        if (acknowledgementCommentId) {
+            /*
+             * The run is already queued and the comment is already posted; this only
+             * records which comment to EDIT later. A failure here costs one extra
+             * comment when the run finishes — it must not turn a successful command
+             * into an "error" outcome that releases the delivery fence and invites
+             * GitHub to replay the whole thing.
+             */
+            try {
+                await GitHubAgentTaskTrigger.recordAcknowledgementComment({
+                    aiRunId: run.id,
+                    github: github,
+                    acknowledgementCommentId: acknowledgementCommentId,
+                });
+            }
+            catch (error) {
+                logger.warn(`Could not record the acknowledgement comment for run ${(_a = run.id) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a.toString()}: ${error}`);
+            }
+        }
+        logger.info(`Queued a ${taskType} run (${(_b = run.id) === null || _b === void 0 ? void 0 : _b.toString()}) from GitHub for ${data.context.repository.organizationName}/${data.context.repository.repositoryName}#${data.conversationNumber}.`);
+        return { handled: true, outcome: "queued", aiRunId: run.id || undefined };
+    }
+    /*
+     * Everything a command needs from the payload, once. Returns null — and
+     * says nothing in the thread — whenever the app has no business answering:
+     * a malformed payload, a bot author, an unconnected repository, or a
+     * commenter without write access.
+     */
+    static async resolveContext(payload) {
+        var _a;
+        const repository = GitHubWebhookEvents.getRepository(payload);
+        const installationId = GitHubWebhookEvents.getInstallationId(payload);
+        const sender = GitHubWebhookEvents.getSender(payload);
+        if (!repository || !installationId || !sender) {
+            return null;
+        }
+        const authorization = await GitHubCommandAuthorizer.authorize({
+            organizationName: repository.organizationName,
+            repositoryName: repository.repositoryName,
+            installationId: installationId,
+            senderLogin: sender.login,
+            senderType: sender.type,
+        });
+        if (authorization.outcome === GitHubAuthorizationOutcome.Ignore) {
+            return null;
+        }
+        if (authorization.outcome ===
+            GitHubAuthorizationOutcome.InsufficientPermission) {
+            /*
+             * A reaction, never a comment. See GitHubCommandAuthorizer: a comment
+             * here would let any GitHub account use this app to post in a
+             * repository it has no write access to.
+             */
+            const commentId = (_a = payload["comment"]) === null || _a === void 0 ? void 0 : _a["id"];
+            if (commentId) {
+                await GitHubConversation.addReactionToComment({
+                    installationId: installationId,
+                    organizationName: repository.organizationName,
+                    repositoryName: repository.repositoryName,
+                    commentId: commentId,
+                    reaction: GitHubReaction.Confused,
+                });
+            }
+            return null;
+        }
+        /*
+         * CommandsDisabled is returned rather than answered here. Whether it
+         * deserves a comment depends on whether the app was actually addressed,
+         * and only the caller knows that: a mention was, and a trigger label was —
+         * but this runs for EVERY label added to EVERY issue, and replying at this
+         * point turned a repository with the switch off into one where labelling
+         * anything produced a bot comment.
+         */
+        return {
+            repository: repository,
+            installationId: installationId,
+            sender: sender,
+            authorization: authorization,
+        };
+    }
+    /*
+     * Answer a command the repository has switched off. Called only once the
+     * caller has established that the app really was addressed.
+     */
+    static async replyCommandsDisabled(data) {
+        await GitHubWebhookHandler.reply({
+            context: data.context,
+            conversationNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+            body: GitHubReplyComposer.refusal({
+                reason: data.context.authorization.reason ||
+                    "GitHub commands are switched off for this repository.",
+            }),
+        });
+        return { handled: true, outcome: "commands-disabled" };
+    }
+    static areCommandsDisabled(context) {
+        return (context.authorization.outcome ===
+            GitHubAuthorizationOutcome.CommandsDisabled);
+    }
+    // Post one comment, and never let a failed comment fail the delivery.
+    static async reply(data) {
+        try {
+            await GitHubConversation.createIssueComment({
+                installationId: data.context.installationId,
+                organizationName: data.context.repository.organizationName,
+                repositoryName: data.context.repository.repositoryName,
+                issueNumber: data.conversationNumber,
+                body: data.body,
+            });
+        }
+        catch (error) {
+            logger.warn(`Could not reply in ${data.context.repository.organizationName}/${data.context.repository.repositoryName}#${data.conversationNumber}: ${error}`);
+        }
+    }
+}
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Object]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], GitHubWebhookHandler, "isDuplicateDelivery", null);
+__decorate([
+    CaptureSpan(),
+    __metadata("design:type", Function),
+    __metadata("design:paramtypes", [Object]),
+    __metadata("design:returntype", Promise)
+], GitHubWebhookHandler, "handleEvent", null);
+//# sourceMappingURL=GitHubWebhookHandler.js.map