@archsight/aios 1.3.2 → 1.5.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json +6 -1
- package/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +5 -1
- package/CHANGELOG.md +53 -0
- package/README.md +90 -3
- package/RELEASE_NOTES.md +51 -0
- package/bin/archsight-aios.mjs +932 -15
- package/delivery/README.md +1 -0
- package/delivery/v1.4.0-release-readiness.md +64 -0
- package/delivery/v1.5.0-release-readiness.md +62 -0
- package/docs/PUBLIC_DISCOVERY.md +1 -1
- package/docs/industry-user-trial-guide.md +343 -0
- package/docs/quickstart.md +10 -0
- package/docs/v1.4.0-writing-boundary.md +42 -0
- package/docs/v1.4.0-writing-workflow-quickstart.md +83 -0
- package/docs/v1.5.0-knowledge-pack-runtime.md +100 -0
- package/gemini-extension.json +1 -1
- package/knowledge/README.md +6 -3
- package/package.json +10 -1
- package/prompts/README.md +4 -0
- package/prompts/evaluation-policy.md +33 -0
- package/prompts/evaluations/engineering-document-writing-fixtures.json +129 -0
- package/prompts/evaluations/engineering-document-writing-scorecard.json +108 -0
- package/prompts/evaluations/engineering-knowledge-pack-scorecard.json +57 -0
- package/prompts/evaluations/skill-runtime/README.md +15 -0
- package/prompts/evaluations/skill-runtime/raw/codex-scheme-writing-sample.md +111 -0
- package/prompts/evaluations/skill-runtime/raw/codex-tender-writing-sample.md +108 -0
- package/prompts/evaluations/skill-runtime/raw/workbuddy-scheme-writing-sample.md +228 -0
- package/prompts/evaluations/skill-runtime/raw/workbuddy-tender-writing-sample.md +143 -0
- package/prompts/evaluations/skill-runtime/v1.4.0-writing-host-scorecard-review.md +29 -0
- package/prompts/evaluations/skill-runtime/v1.4.0-writing-host-validation.json +112 -0
- package/prompts/evaluations/skill-runtime/v1.4.0-writing-host-validation.md +43 -0
- package/prompts/prompt-registry.md +8 -2
- package/rag/README.md +4 -0
- package/runtime/archsight-aios.manifest.json +227 -8
- package/runtime/capability-adapters.json +13 -0
- package/runtime/capability-registry.json +23 -2
- package/runtime/skill-routing.md +19 -4
- package/scripts/build-prompt-run-pack.mjs +27 -9
- package/scripts/validate-knowledge-pack.mjs +96 -0
- package/scripts/validate-prompt-fixtures.mjs +31 -10
- package/scripts/validate-prompt-scorecard.mjs +22 -6
- package/scripts/validate-skill-runtime-evidence.mjs +125 -0
- package/skills/README.md +29 -3
- package/skills/aios/SKILL.md +24 -10
- package/skills/aios-commercial-tender/SKILL.md +2 -0
- package/skills/aios-construction-scheme/SKILL.md +7 -3
- package/skills/aios-contract-audit/SKILL.md +121 -0
- package/skills/aios-contract-audit/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
- package/skills/aios-contract-audit/prompts/basic-prompt.md +85 -0
- package/skills/aios-contract-draft/SKILL.md +130 -0
- package/skills/aios-contract-draft/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
- package/skills/aios-contract-draft/prompts/basic-prompt.md +76 -0
- package/skills/aios-daily/SKILL.md +51 -0
- package/skills/aios-daily/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
- package/skills/aios-daily-write/SKILL.md +116 -0
- package/skills/aios-daily-write/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
- package/skills/aios-daily-write/prompts/basic-prompt.md +72 -0
- package/skills/aios-knowledge/SKILL.md +14 -3
- package/skills/aios-meeting/SKILL.md +52 -0
- package/skills/aios-meeting/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
- package/skills/aios-meeting-write/SKILL.md +117 -0
- package/skills/aios-meeting-write/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
- package/skills/aios-meeting-write/prompts/basic-prompt.md +72 -0
- package/skills/aios-review/SKILL.md +9 -6
- package/skills/aios-runtime/SKILL.md +17 -7
- package/skills/aios-scheme/SKILL.md +50 -0
- package/skills/aios-scheme/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
- package/skills/aios-scheme-audit/SKILL.md +113 -0
- package/skills/aios-scheme-audit/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
- package/skills/aios-scheme-audit/prompts/basic-prompt.md +90 -0
- package/skills/aios-scheme-write/SKILL.md +132 -0
- package/skills/aios-scheme-write/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
- package/skills/aios-scheme-write/prompts/basic-prompt.md +83 -0
- package/skills/aios-tender/SKILL.md +50 -0
- package/skills/aios-tender/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
- package/skills/aios-tender-audit/SKILL.md +119 -0
- package/skills/aios-tender-audit/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
- package/skills/aios-tender-audit/prompts/basic-prompt.md +94 -0
- package/skills/aios-tender-write/SKILL.md +130 -0
- package/skills/aios-tender-write/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
- package/skills/aios-tender-write/prompts/basic-prompt.md +82 -0
- package/skills/archsight-aios/SKILL.md +17 -5
- package/skills/engineering-business-starter-kit.md +21 -7
- package/templates/README.md +29 -4
- package/templates/document-writing/draft.md +15 -0
- package/templates/document-writing/final.md +16 -0
- package/templates/document-writing/material-index.md +18 -0
- package/templates/document-writing/review-notes.md +18 -0
- package/templates/document-writing/source-normalized.md +20 -0
- package/templates/document-writing/writing-brief.md +23 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/scheme/README.md +16 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/scheme/draft.md +25 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/scheme/final.md +20 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/scheme/material-index.md +23 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/scheme/review-notes.md +23 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/scheme/source-normalized.md +35 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/scheme/writing-brief.md +26 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/tender/README.md +16 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/tender/draft.md +27 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/tender/final.md +20 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/tender/material-index.md +23 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/tender/review-notes.md +23 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/tender/source-normalized.md +34 -0
- package/templates/document-writing-samples/tender/writing-brief.md +26 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack/README.md +30 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack/clause-map.md +11 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack/entity-relation-map.md +18 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack/eval-questions.md +13 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack/knowledge-pack.source.json +107 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack/review-notes.md +14 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack/source-register.md +13 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack/standard-register.md +10 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack-samples/scheme-review/README.md +18 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack-samples/scheme-review/clause-map.md +8 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack-samples/scheme-review/entity-relation-map.md +17 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack-samples/scheme-review/eval-questions.md +9 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack-samples/scheme-review/knowledge-pack.source.json +251 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack-samples/scheme-review/review-notes.md +8 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack-samples/scheme-review/source-register.md +9 -0
- package/templates/knowledge-pack-samples/scheme-review/standard-register.md +9 -0
- package/templates/project-ai/.ai/agent-routing.md +6 -2
- package/templates/project-ai/.ai/skills.md +29 -3
- package/vision/README.md +1 -0
- package/vision/roadmap.md +22 -3
- package/vision/v1.4.0-engineering-document-workflow.md +205 -0
- package/workflows/rag-pipeline.md +14 -9
|
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Source Normalized
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## 资料边界
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
|
6
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
7
|
+
| 文档类型 | 技术标写作样板 |
|
|
8
|
+
| 原始格式 | Markdown 归一化样例 |
|
|
9
|
+
| 脱敏状态 | 已脱敏,全部实体为虚构 |
|
|
10
|
+
| 外发边界 | 可作为公开样例 |
|
|
11
|
+
| 归一化日期 | 2026-06-19 |
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## 资料来源清单
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
| 序号 | 原始资料 | 版本 / 日期 | 页码 / 章节 / 图号 | 当前用途 | 缺口 |
|
|
16
|
+
|---:|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
17
|
+
| 1 | 技术标要求摘要 | 示例版 | 评分办法摘录 | 形成评分点到章节映射 | 缺少招标原文页码 |
|
|
18
|
+
| 2 | 用户初稿 | 示例版 | 施工总体部署 | 改写章节初稿 | 缺少本项目组织架构 |
|
|
19
|
+
| 3 | 历史标书素材 | 示例版 | 安全文明施工 | 判断可复用素材 | 含旧项目人员和设备 |
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## 归一化正文
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
### 技术标要求摘要
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- 施工总体部署需要说明施工组织、分区安排、资源配置和质量安全文明施工措施。
|
|
26
|
+
- 评分点要求章节能够对应工程概况、进度计划、资源配置、质量管理、安全文明施工和成品保护。
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
### 用户初稿
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
本项目拟采用分区流水施工,重点控制总平面布置、材料运输、交叉作业和安全文明施工。具体人员、设备和工期待项目团队确认。
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### 历史标书素材
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
历史项目使用过“项目经理牵头、技术负责人统筹、专职安全员现场巡查”的组织描述,并包含旧项目设备型号、工期安排和现场布置内容。旧项目名称、人员、设备、工期和现场布置不得直接套用。
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Writing Brief
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## 本次写作任务
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
| 项目 | 内容 |
|
|
6
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
7
|
+
| 任务类型 | 技术标章节生成 |
|
|
8
|
+
| 目标章节 | 施工总体部署与安全文明施工措施 |
|
|
9
|
+
| 输出格式 | Markdown 工作母版 |
|
|
10
|
+
| 后续交付格式 | docx |
|
|
11
|
+
| 截止时间 | 示例,不设真实日期 |
|
|
12
|
+
| 人工复核岗位 | 技术负责人、投标负责人、项目经理 |
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## 输入依据
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
| 序号 | 依据 | 来源 | 定位 | 备注 |
|
|
17
|
+
|---:|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18
|
+
| 1 | 技术标要求摘要 | `source-normalized.md` | 评分点映射 | 缺招标原文页码 |
|
|
19
|
+
| 2 | 用户初稿 | `source-normalized.md` | 章节初稿 | 需补组织架构 |
|
|
20
|
+
| 3 | 历史标书素材 | `material-index.md` | 表述复用 | 旧项目事实不可套用 |
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## 禁止承诺和禁止结论
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- 不编造资质、业绩、人员、设备、工期、金额、奖项或项目事实。
|
|
25
|
+
- 不输出中标概率、最终投标决策、评标结论或违法规避建议。
|
|
26
|
+
- 缺少依据时写 `待补`、`需核验` 或 `转人工复核`。
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# AIOS Knowledge Pack Workbench
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
> 类型:工程知识治理工作台
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
## 使用顺序
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
1. 在 `knowledge-pack.source.json` 中维护结构化知识源、标准、条文、实体、关系、查询规则和评估问题。
|
|
8
|
+
2. 在 `source-register.md` 和 `standard-register.md` 中保留业务人员可读的来源和版本登记。
|
|
9
|
+
3. 在 `clause-map.md` 中把条文拆成对象、条件、判定、例外和证据。
|
|
10
|
+
4. 在 `entity-relation-map.md` 中维护 GraphRAG 实体和关系。
|
|
11
|
+
5. 在 `eval-questions.md` 中维护可回答、不可回答、冲突和缺上下文问题。
|
|
12
|
+
6. 在 `review-notes.md` 中记录人工复核状态、阻断项和发布边界。
|
|
13
|
+
7. 执行 `archsight-aios knowledge:validate`、`knowledge:compile`、`knowledge:eval`,再把编译产物交给本地 Reference Runtime。
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## 推荐命令
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
```bash
|
|
18
|
+
archsight-aios knowledge:validate --name knowledge-pack
|
|
19
|
+
archsight-aios knowledge:compile --name knowledge-pack
|
|
20
|
+
archsight-aios knowledge:inspect --name knowledge-pack
|
|
21
|
+
archsight-aios knowledge:lookup --pack knowledge-pack/compiled/knowledge-pack.json --query "示例问题"
|
|
22
|
+
archsight-aios knowledge:eval --name knowledge-pack
|
|
23
|
+
```
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
## 边界
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
- Knowledge Pack 是可追溯知识资产,不是官方规范数据库。
|
|
28
|
+
- 未授权规范全文不得直接进入仓库。
|
|
29
|
+
- `published` 只表示包内资料通过本项目复核,不代表合规终审或工程签审结论。
|
|
30
|
+
- 缺来源、缺版本、缺适用条件或缺人工复核时,查询结果必须返回 `need_context`、`not_found`、`conflict` 或 `inapplicable`。
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 条文结构化映射
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
| 条文 ID | 标准 ID | 条文号 | 标题 | 对象 | 条件 | 判定 / 要求 | 例外 | 来源 | 复核状态 |
|
|
4
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
5
|
+
| CLAUSE-001 | STD-001 | 1.0.1 | 示例条文 | 对象示例 | 条件示例 | 说明检查对象、触发条件、判断依据和例外条件 | 例外示例 | SRC-001 p.1 | draft |
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## 拆解原则
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
- 条文原文、人工概括、工程经验和模型推断必须分开。
|
|
10
|
+
- 每个条文至少保留来源、版本、页码或定位方式。
|
|
11
|
+
- 缺少项目条件时,适用性必须标为 `need_context`。
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 实体与关系映射
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## 实体
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
| 实体 ID | 类型 | 名称 | 来源 | 置信度 |
|
|
6
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
7
|
+
| ENT-001 | Requirement | 示例要求 | CLAUSE-001 | 0.6 |
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## 关系
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
| 关系 ID | From | 关系 | To | 来源 | 置信度 |
|
|
12
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
13
|
+
| REL-001 | ENT-001 | DERIVED_FROM | CLAUSE-001 | CLAUSE-001 | 0.6 |
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## GraphRAG 约束
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
- 实体和关系必须保留来源、版本和置信度。
|
|
18
|
+
- 关系不能只来自模型猜测;缺证据时标为 `draft` 或 `need_review`。
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 评估问题
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
| 评估 ID | 类型 | 问题 | 期望状态 | 期望适用性 | 期望引用 | 期望说明 |
|
|
4
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
5
|
+
| EVAL-001 | need_context | 示例问题是否适用? | found | need_context | CLAUSE-001 | 项目条件 |
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## 覆盖要求
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
- 可回答问题。
|
|
10
|
+
- 不可回答问题。
|
|
11
|
+
- 版本不适用问题。
|
|
12
|
+
- 冲突条文问题。
|
|
13
|
+
- 缺项目条件问题。
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
{
|
|
2
|
+
"schema": 1,
|
|
3
|
+
"pack": {
|
|
4
|
+
"id": "example-knowledge-pack",
|
|
5
|
+
"title": "示例工程知识包",
|
|
6
|
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
7
|
+
"status": "draft",
|
|
8
|
+
"domain": "construction-knowledge",
|
|
9
|
+
"region": "CN",
|
|
10
|
+
"discipline": "construction",
|
|
11
|
+
"sourceVersion": "DRAFT-0.1",
|
|
12
|
+
"dataBoundary": "模板仅定义结构,不包含真实客户、真实项目或未授权规范全文。",
|
|
13
|
+
"license": "project-internal"
|
|
14
|
+
},
|
|
15
|
+
"sources": [
|
|
16
|
+
{
|
|
17
|
+
"id": "SRC-001",
|
|
18
|
+
"name": "示例来源",
|
|
19
|
+
"type": "standard-excerpt",
|
|
20
|
+
"version": "DRAFT-0.1",
|
|
21
|
+
"pathOrUrl": "source-register.md",
|
|
22
|
+
"authorization": "project-internal",
|
|
23
|
+
"hash": "to-be-filled",
|
|
24
|
+
"reviewStatus": "draft",
|
|
25
|
+
"risk": "待替换为授权来源和真实 hash。"
|
|
26
|
+
}
|
|
27
|
+
],
|
|
28
|
+
"standards": [
|
|
29
|
+
{
|
|
30
|
+
"id": "STD-001",
|
|
31
|
+
"name": "示例标准",
|
|
32
|
+
"code": "EXAMPLE-001",
|
|
33
|
+
"version": "DRAFT-0.1",
|
|
34
|
+
"region": "CN",
|
|
35
|
+
"discipline": "construction",
|
|
36
|
+
"status": "draft",
|
|
37
|
+
"sourceId": "SRC-001",
|
|
38
|
+
"sourceVersion": "DRAFT-0.1",
|
|
39
|
+
"effectiveStatus": "to_verify"
|
|
40
|
+
}
|
|
41
|
+
],
|
|
42
|
+
"clauses": [
|
|
43
|
+
{
|
|
44
|
+
"id": "CLAUSE-001",
|
|
45
|
+
"standardId": "STD-001",
|
|
46
|
+
"clauseNo": "1.0.1",
|
|
47
|
+
"title": "示例条文",
|
|
48
|
+
"text": "此处只写授权摘录或人工概括,不能粘贴未授权规范全文。",
|
|
49
|
+
"requirement": "说明检查对象、触发条件、判断依据和例外条件。",
|
|
50
|
+
"objects": ["对象示例"],
|
|
51
|
+
"conditions": ["条件示例"],
|
|
52
|
+
"exceptions": ["例外示例"],
|
|
53
|
+
"applicability": "need_context",
|
|
54
|
+
"sourceId": "SRC-001",
|
|
55
|
+
"pageRange": "p.1",
|
|
56
|
+
"reviewStatus": "draft",
|
|
57
|
+
"tags": ["示例"]
|
|
58
|
+
}
|
|
59
|
+
],
|
|
60
|
+
"entities": [
|
|
61
|
+
{
|
|
62
|
+
"id": "ENT-001",
|
|
63
|
+
"type": "Requirement",
|
|
64
|
+
"name": "示例要求",
|
|
65
|
+
"sourceRefs": ["CLAUSE-001"],
|
|
66
|
+
"confidence": 0.6
|
|
67
|
+
}
|
|
68
|
+
],
|
|
69
|
+
"relations": [
|
|
70
|
+
{
|
|
71
|
+
"id": "REL-001",
|
|
72
|
+
"from": "ENT-001",
|
|
73
|
+
"to": "CLAUSE-001",
|
|
74
|
+
"type": "DERIVED_FROM",
|
|
75
|
+
"sourceRefs": ["CLAUSE-001"],
|
|
76
|
+
"confidence": 0.6
|
|
77
|
+
}
|
|
78
|
+
],
|
|
79
|
+
"lookupRules": [
|
|
80
|
+
{
|
|
81
|
+
"id": "LOOKUP-001",
|
|
82
|
+
"queryTerms": ["示例"],
|
|
83
|
+
"clauseIds": ["CLAUSE-001"],
|
|
84
|
+
"applicability": "need_context",
|
|
85
|
+
"requiredContext": ["项目条件"],
|
|
86
|
+
"notes": "模板规则默认需要补充项目条件。"
|
|
87
|
+
}
|
|
88
|
+
],
|
|
89
|
+
"evalQuestions": [
|
|
90
|
+
{
|
|
91
|
+
"id": "EVAL-001",
|
|
92
|
+
"type": "need_context",
|
|
93
|
+
"question": "示例问题是否适用?",
|
|
94
|
+
"expectedStatus": "found",
|
|
95
|
+
"expectedApplicability": "need_context",
|
|
96
|
+
"expectedClauseIds": ["CLAUSE-001"],
|
|
97
|
+
"mustCiteSourceVersion": true,
|
|
98
|
+
"expectedNotesContains": ["项目条件"]
|
|
99
|
+
}
|
|
100
|
+
],
|
|
101
|
+
"review": {
|
|
102
|
+
"humanReviewer": "待填写",
|
|
103
|
+
"reviewedAt": "",
|
|
104
|
+
"status": "draft",
|
|
105
|
+
"notes": "模板未复核,不得发布。"
|
|
106
|
+
}
|
|
107
|
+
}
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 复核记录
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
| 项 | 状态 | 证据 | 处理建议 | 负责人 |
|
|
4
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
5
|
+
| 来源授权 | draft | SRC-001 | 替换为授权来源 | 知识负责人 |
|
|
6
|
+
| 条文拆解 | draft | CLAUSE-001 | 人工复核对象、条件、例外 | 专业负责人 |
|
|
7
|
+
| 发布状态 | blocked | review.status=draft | 未复核前不得发布 | 项目负责人 |
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## 发布门禁
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
- `draft`:允许继续整理,不允许用于正式判断。
|
|
12
|
+
- `reviewed`:允许内部使用,结论仍需人工复核。
|
|
13
|
+
- `blocked`:存在来源、授权、冲突或适用性阻断。
|
|
14
|
+
- `published`:可作为项目内 Reference Runtime 查询资产,但不替代专业签审。
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 知识来源登记
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
| 来源 ID | 名称 | 类型 | 版本 | 路径 / URL | 授权状态 | hash | 复核状态 | 风险 |
|
|
4
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
5
|
+
| SRC-001 | 示例来源 | standard-excerpt | DRAFT-0.1 | source-register.md | project-internal | to-be-filled | draft | 待替换为授权来源 |
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## 入库条件
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
- 来源可追溯。
|
|
10
|
+
- 授权状态明确。
|
|
11
|
+
- 版本和发布时间明确。
|
|
12
|
+
- 可区分原文、摘要、人工归纳和 AI 推断。
|
|
13
|
+
- 未授权全文不得进入仓库。
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 标准 / 规范登记
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
| 标准 ID | 名称 | 编号 | 版本 | 地区 | 专业 | 生效状态 | 来源 ID | 审查用途 |
|
|
4
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
5
|
+
| STD-001 | 示例标准 | EXAMPLE-001 | DRAFT-0.1 | CN | construction | to_verify | SRC-001 | 示例 |
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## 维护规则
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
- 标准版本变化时,必须记录差异、影响范围和需要重建的索引或图谱。
|
|
10
|
+
- 标准状态为 `to_verify` 时,不允许作为正式合规结论。
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 专项施工方案审查 Knowledge Pack 样板
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
> 数据说明:本样板全部为虚构 / 合成资料,只用于验证 Knowledge Pack、Reference Runtime 和 eval gate,不包含真实客户、真实项目、真实规范全文或未授权资料。
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
## 样板目标
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
- 证明知识源登记、标准登记、条文结构化、GraphRAG 映射、查询规则和评估问题可以编译成一个 `knowledge-pack.json`。
|
|
8
|
+
- 证明本地 `knowledge.norm_lookup` Reference Runtime 可以返回 `found`、`not_found`、`conflict`、`inapplicable` 和 `need_context`。
|
|
9
|
+
- 证明 `knowledge:eval` 能检查引用、版本、适用性和拒答边界。
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## 推荐命令
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
```bash
|
|
14
|
+
archsight-aios knowledge:validate --name scheme-review
|
|
15
|
+
archsight-aios knowledge:compile --name scheme-review
|
|
16
|
+
archsight-aios knowledge:lookup --pack scheme-review/compiled/knowledge-pack.json --query "深基坑开挖前需要专项方案吗" --project-condition "开挖深度 4.2m"
|
|
17
|
+
archsight-aios knowledge:eval --name scheme-review
|
|
18
|
+
```
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 条文结构化映射
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
| 条文 ID | 标准 ID | 条文号 | 标题 | 对象 | 条件 | 判定 / 要求 | 例外 | 来源 | 复核状态 |
|
|
4
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
5
|
+
| CLAUSE-DEEP-EXCAVATION | STD-SYN-SCHEME | S-1.1 | 深基坑专项方案触发条件 | 深基坑 / 土方开挖 / 支护体系 | 开挖深度超过 3m;环境复杂;地下水影响 | 形成专项施工方案并保留专家复核路径 | 缺深度或环境条件时不能判断 | SRC-SYN-SCHEME p.3 | reviewed |
|
|
6
|
+
| CLAUSE-HIGH-FORMWORK | STD-SYN-SCHEME | S-2.1 | 高支模方案计算书要求 | 模板支撑 / 高支模 / 计算书 | 高度、跨度或荷载达到控制条件 | 提供计算书、搭设参数和验收记录 | 缺计算书时不得判断方案通过 | SRC-SYN-SCHEME p.7 | reviewed |
|
|
7
|
+
| CLAUSE-CRANE-LIFTING | STD-SYN-SCHEME | S-3.1 | 起重吊装作业资料要求 | 起重吊装 / 吊点 / 设备能力 | 存在吊装作业 | 明确设备参数、吊点、路线、资质、警戒和旁站 | 缺设备参数时只能标为需核验 | SRC-SYN-SCHEME p.11 | reviewed |
|
|
8
|
+
| CLAUSE-CONFLICT-REVIEW | STD-SYN-SCHEME | S-9.9 | 冲突口径人工复核 | 冲突资料 / 专家意见 / 现场记录 | 关键参数冲突或版本不一致 | 暂停自动结论并转人工复核 | 冲突消解前不得发布结论 | SRC-SYN-SCHEME p.15 | reviewed |
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 实体与关系映射
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## 实体
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
| 实体 ID | 类型 | 名称 | 来源 | 置信度 |
|
|
6
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
7
|
+
| ENT-DEEP-EXCAVATION | Requirement | 深基坑专项方案要求 | CLAUSE-DEEP-EXCAVATION | 0.92 |
|
|
8
|
+
| ENT-HIGH-FORMWORK | Requirement | 高支模计算书要求 | CLAUSE-HIGH-FORMWORK | 0.90 |
|
|
9
|
+
| ENT-CRANE-LIFTING | Requirement | 起重吊装资料要求 | CLAUSE-CRANE-LIFTING | 0.88 |
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## 关系
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
| 关系 ID | From | 关系 | To | 来源 | 置信度 |
|
|
14
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
15
|
+
| REL-DEEP-DERIVED | ENT-DEEP-EXCAVATION | DERIVED_FROM | CLAUSE-DEEP-EXCAVATION | CLAUSE-DEEP-EXCAVATION | 0.92 |
|
|
16
|
+
| REL-FORMWORK-DERIVED | ENT-HIGH-FORMWORK | DERIVED_FROM | CLAUSE-HIGH-FORMWORK | CLAUSE-HIGH-FORMWORK | 0.90 |
|
|
17
|
+
| REL-LIFTING-DERIVED | ENT-CRANE-LIFTING | DERIVED_FROM | CLAUSE-CRANE-LIFTING | CLAUSE-CRANE-LIFTING | 0.88 |
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 评估问题
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
| 评估 ID | 类型 | 问题 | 期望状态 | 期望适用性 | 期望引用 | 期望说明 |
|
|
4
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
5
|
+
| EVAL-DEEP-EXCAVATION | need_context | 深基坑开挖前需要专项方案吗? | found | need_context | CLAUSE-DEEP-EXCAVATION | 开挖深度 |
|
|
6
|
+
| EVAL-HIGH-FORMWORK | answerable | 高支模方案是否应检查计算书? | found | applicable | CLAUSE-HIGH-FORMWORK | 计算书 |
|
|
7
|
+
| EVAL-NOT-FOUND | unanswerable | 这个知识包能判断消防喷淋系统联动验收吗? | not_found | need_context | 无 | 未命中 |
|
|
8
|
+
| EVAL-CONFLICT | conflict | 专家意见和现场记录版本不一致时能否自动放行? | conflict | need_context | CLAUSE-CONFLICT-REVIEW | 人工复核 |
|
|
9
|
+
| EVAL-INAPPLICABLE | version_mismatch | 高支模方案是否应检查计算书? | inapplicable | not_applicable | 无 | 版本 |
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
{
|
|
2
|
+
"schema": 1,
|
|
3
|
+
"pack": {
|
|
4
|
+
"id": "scheme-review-reference",
|
|
5
|
+
"title": "专项施工方案审查 Reference Knowledge Pack",
|
|
6
|
+
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
7
|
+
"status": "reviewed",
|
|
8
|
+
"domain": "construction-scheme-review",
|
|
9
|
+
"region": "CN",
|
|
10
|
+
"discipline": "construction",
|
|
11
|
+
"sourceVersion": "SYN-2026.01",
|
|
12
|
+
"dataBoundary": "全部资料为虚构合成样板,只验证知识治理结构和本地 Reference Runtime,不代表真实规范条文。",
|
|
13
|
+
"license": "synthetic-sample"
|
|
14
|
+
},
|
|
15
|
+
"sources": [
|
|
16
|
+
{
|
|
17
|
+
"id": "SRC-SYN-SCHEME",
|
|
18
|
+
"name": "合成专项施工方案审查口径",
|
|
19
|
+
"type": "synthetic-standard-excerpt",
|
|
20
|
+
"version": "SYN-2026.01",
|
|
21
|
+
"pathOrUrl": "source-register.md",
|
|
22
|
+
"authorization": "synthetic-sample",
|
|
23
|
+
"hash": "sha256:synthetic-scheme-review",
|
|
24
|
+
"reviewStatus": "reviewed",
|
|
25
|
+
"risk": "合成样板不可作为真实规范依据。"
|
|
26
|
+
}
|
|
27
|
+
],
|
|
28
|
+
"standards": [
|
|
29
|
+
{
|
|
30
|
+
"id": "STD-SYN-SCHEME",
|
|
31
|
+
"name": "合成专项施工方案审查标准",
|
|
32
|
+
"code": "SYN-SCHEME-2026",
|
|
33
|
+
"version": "SYN-2026.01",
|
|
34
|
+
"region": "CN",
|
|
35
|
+
"discipline": "construction",
|
|
36
|
+
"status": "reviewed",
|
|
37
|
+
"sourceId": "SRC-SYN-SCHEME",
|
|
38
|
+
"sourceVersion": "SYN-2026.01",
|
|
39
|
+
"effectiveStatus": "sample_only"
|
|
40
|
+
}
|
|
41
|
+
],
|
|
42
|
+
"clauses": [
|
|
43
|
+
{
|
|
44
|
+
"id": "CLAUSE-DEEP-EXCAVATION",
|
|
45
|
+
"standardId": "STD-SYN-SCHEME",
|
|
46
|
+
"clauseNo": "S-1.1",
|
|
47
|
+
"title": "深基坑专项方案触发条件",
|
|
48
|
+
"text": "合成口径:开挖深度超过 3m 或地质、水文、周边环境复杂时,应形成专项施工方案并保留专家复核路径。",
|
|
49
|
+
"requirement": "识别开挖深度、周边环境、支护形式和专家复核需求。",
|
|
50
|
+
"objects": ["深基坑", "土方开挖", "支护体系"],
|
|
51
|
+
"conditions": ["开挖深度超过 3m", "周边环境复杂", "地下水影响明显"],
|
|
52
|
+
"exceptions": ["缺少深度或环境条件时不能判断"],
|
|
53
|
+
"applicability": "need_context",
|
|
54
|
+
"sourceId": "SRC-SYN-SCHEME",
|
|
55
|
+
"pageRange": "p.3",
|
|
56
|
+
"reviewStatus": "reviewed",
|
|
57
|
+
"tags": ["深基坑", "专项方案", "专家复核"]
|
|
58
|
+
},
|
|
59
|
+
{
|
|
60
|
+
"id": "CLAUSE-HIGH-FORMWORK",
|
|
61
|
+
"standardId": "STD-SYN-SCHEME",
|
|
62
|
+
"clauseNo": "S-2.1",
|
|
63
|
+
"title": "高支模方案计算书要求",
|
|
64
|
+
"text": "合成口径:模板支撑体系高度、跨度或荷载达到项目控制条件时,应提供计算书、搭设参数和验收记录。",
|
|
65
|
+
"requirement": "检查支架高度、跨度、荷载、计算书和验收记录是否齐全。",
|
|
66
|
+
"objects": ["模板支撑", "高支模", "计算书"],
|
|
67
|
+
"conditions": ["支撑高度达到控制条件", "集中荷载或线荷载较大"],
|
|
68
|
+
"exceptions": ["缺计算书时不得判断方案已通过"],
|
|
69
|
+
"applicability": "applicable",
|
|
70
|
+
"sourceId": "SRC-SYN-SCHEME",
|
|
71
|
+
"pageRange": "p.7",
|
|
72
|
+
"reviewStatus": "reviewed",
|
|
73
|
+
"tags": ["高支模", "计算书", "验收"]
|
|
74
|
+
},
|
|
75
|
+
{
|
|
76
|
+
"id": "CLAUSE-CRANE-LIFTING",
|
|
77
|
+
"standardId": "STD-SYN-SCHEME",
|
|
78
|
+
"clauseNo": "S-3.1",
|
|
79
|
+
"title": "起重吊装作业资料要求",
|
|
80
|
+
"text": "合成口径:起重吊装作业应明确设备参数、吊点、吊装路径、人员资质、警戒范围和旁站记录。",
|
|
81
|
+
"requirement": "检查设备能力、吊点复核、人员资质和现场警戒记录。",
|
|
82
|
+
"objects": ["起重吊装", "吊点", "设备能力"],
|
|
83
|
+
"conditions": ["存在吊装作业"],
|
|
84
|
+
"exceptions": ["缺少设备参数时只能标为需核验"],
|
|
85
|
+
"applicability": "applicable",
|
|
86
|
+
"sourceId": "SRC-SYN-SCHEME",
|
|
87
|
+
"pageRange": "p.11",
|
|
88
|
+
"reviewStatus": "reviewed",
|
|
89
|
+
"tags": ["吊装", "设备", "旁站"]
|
|
90
|
+
},
|
|
91
|
+
{
|
|
92
|
+
"id": "CLAUSE-CONFLICT-REVIEW",
|
|
93
|
+
"standardId": "STD-SYN-SCHEME",
|
|
94
|
+
"clauseNo": "S-9.9",
|
|
95
|
+
"title": "冲突口径人工复核",
|
|
96
|
+
"text": "合成口径:当方案资料、专家意见和现场记录对关键参数存在冲突时,应暂停自动结论并转人工复核。",
|
|
97
|
+
"requirement": "识别参数冲突并阻断自动放行。",
|
|
98
|
+
"objects": ["冲突资料", "专家意见", "现场记录"],
|
|
99
|
+
"conditions": ["关键参数冲突", "版本不一致"],
|
|
100
|
+
"exceptions": ["冲突消解前不得发布结论"],
|
|
101
|
+
"applicability": "need_context",
|
|
102
|
+
"sourceId": "SRC-SYN-SCHEME",
|
|
103
|
+
"pageRange": "p.15",
|
|
104
|
+
"reviewStatus": "reviewed",
|
|
105
|
+
"tags": ["冲突", "人工复核", "阻断"]
|
|
106
|
+
}
|
|
107
|
+
],
|
|
108
|
+
"entities": [
|
|
109
|
+
{
|
|
110
|
+
"id": "ENT-DEEP-EXCAVATION",
|
|
111
|
+
"type": "Requirement",
|
|
112
|
+
"name": "深基坑专项方案要求",
|
|
113
|
+
"sourceRefs": ["CLAUSE-DEEP-EXCAVATION"],
|
|
114
|
+
"confidence": 0.92
|
|
115
|
+
},
|
|
116
|
+
{
|
|
117
|
+
"id": "ENT-HIGH-FORMWORK",
|
|
118
|
+
"type": "Requirement",
|
|
119
|
+
"name": "高支模计算书要求",
|
|
120
|
+
"sourceRefs": ["CLAUSE-HIGH-FORMWORK"],
|
|
121
|
+
"confidence": 0.9
|
|
122
|
+
},
|
|
123
|
+
{
|
|
124
|
+
"id": "ENT-CRANE-LIFTING",
|
|
125
|
+
"type": "Requirement",
|
|
126
|
+
"name": "起重吊装资料要求",
|
|
127
|
+
"sourceRefs": ["CLAUSE-CRANE-LIFTING"],
|
|
128
|
+
"confidence": 0.88
|
|
129
|
+
}
|
|
130
|
+
],
|
|
131
|
+
"relations": [
|
|
132
|
+
{
|
|
133
|
+
"id": "REL-DEEP-DERIVED",
|
|
134
|
+
"from": "ENT-DEEP-EXCAVATION",
|
|
135
|
+
"to": "CLAUSE-DEEP-EXCAVATION",
|
|
136
|
+
"type": "DERIVED_FROM",
|
|
137
|
+
"sourceRefs": ["CLAUSE-DEEP-EXCAVATION"],
|
|
138
|
+
"confidence": 0.92
|
|
139
|
+
},
|
|
140
|
+
{
|
|
141
|
+
"id": "REL-FORMWORK-DERIVED",
|
|
142
|
+
"from": "ENT-HIGH-FORMWORK",
|
|
143
|
+
"to": "CLAUSE-HIGH-FORMWORK",
|
|
144
|
+
"type": "DERIVED_FROM",
|
|
145
|
+
"sourceRefs": ["CLAUSE-HIGH-FORMWORK"],
|
|
146
|
+
"confidence": 0.9
|
|
147
|
+
},
|
|
148
|
+
{
|
|
149
|
+
"id": "REL-LIFTING-DERIVED",
|
|
150
|
+
"from": "ENT-CRANE-LIFTING",
|
|
151
|
+
"to": "CLAUSE-CRANE-LIFTING",
|
|
152
|
+
"type": "DERIVED_FROM",
|
|
153
|
+
"sourceRefs": ["CLAUSE-CRANE-LIFTING"],
|
|
154
|
+
"confidence": 0.88
|
|
155
|
+
}
|
|
156
|
+
],
|
|
157
|
+
"lookupRules": [
|
|
158
|
+
{
|
|
159
|
+
"id": "LOOKUP-DEEP-EXCAVATION",
|
|
160
|
+
"queryTerms": ["深基坑", "开挖", "基坑"],
|
|
161
|
+
"clauseIds": ["CLAUSE-DEEP-EXCAVATION"],
|
|
162
|
+
"applicability": "need_context",
|
|
163
|
+
"requiredContext": ["开挖深度", "周边环境", "地下水"],
|
|
164
|
+
"notes": "命中深基坑口径;必须结合开挖深度和周边环境判断。"
|
|
165
|
+
},
|
|
166
|
+
{
|
|
167
|
+
"id": "LOOKUP-HIGH-FORMWORK",
|
|
168
|
+
"queryTerms": ["高支模", "模板支撑", "计算书"],
|
|
169
|
+
"clauseIds": ["CLAUSE-HIGH-FORMWORK"],
|
|
170
|
+
"applicability": "applicable",
|
|
171
|
+
"requiredContext": ["支撑高度", "跨度", "荷载"],
|
|
172
|
+
"notes": "命中高支模计算书口径;缺计算书时不得判断方案通过。"
|
|
173
|
+
},
|
|
174
|
+
{
|
|
175
|
+
"id": "LOOKUP-CRANE-LIFTING",
|
|
176
|
+
"queryTerms": ["吊装", "起重", "吊点"],
|
|
177
|
+
"clauseIds": ["CLAUSE-CRANE-LIFTING"],
|
|
178
|
+
"applicability": "applicable",
|
|
179
|
+
"requiredContext": ["设备参数", "吊点", "人员资质"],
|
|
180
|
+
"notes": "命中起重吊装资料口径;设备参数缺失时需核验。"
|
|
181
|
+
},
|
|
182
|
+
{
|
|
183
|
+
"id": "LOOKUP-CONFLICT",
|
|
184
|
+
"queryTerms": ["冲突", "版本不一致", "专家意见不一致"],
|
|
185
|
+
"clauseIds": ["CLAUSE-CONFLICT-REVIEW"],
|
|
186
|
+
"applicability": "need_context",
|
|
187
|
+
"status": "conflict",
|
|
188
|
+
"requiredContext": ["冲突来源", "版本关系"],
|
|
189
|
+
"notes": "命中冲突口径;自动结论应暂停并转人工复核。"
|
|
190
|
+
}
|
|
191
|
+
],
|
|
192
|
+
"evalQuestions": [
|
|
193
|
+
{
|
|
194
|
+
"id": "EVAL-DEEP-EXCAVATION",
|
|
195
|
+
"type": "need_context",
|
|
196
|
+
"question": "深基坑开挖前需要专项方案吗?",
|
|
197
|
+
"expectedStatus": "found",
|
|
198
|
+
"expectedApplicability": "need_context",
|
|
199
|
+
"expectedClauseIds": ["CLAUSE-DEEP-EXCAVATION"],
|
|
200
|
+
"mustCiteSourceVersion": true,
|
|
201
|
+
"expectedNotesContains": ["开挖深度"]
|
|
202
|
+
},
|
|
203
|
+
{
|
|
204
|
+
"id": "EVAL-HIGH-FORMWORK",
|
|
205
|
+
"type": "answerable",
|
|
206
|
+
"question": "高支模方案是否应检查计算书?",
|
|
207
|
+
"expectedStatus": "found",
|
|
208
|
+
"expectedApplicability": "applicable",
|
|
209
|
+
"expectedClauseIds": ["CLAUSE-HIGH-FORMWORK"],
|
|
210
|
+
"mustCiteSourceVersion": true,
|
|
211
|
+
"expectedNotesContains": ["计算书"]
|
|
212
|
+
},
|
|
213
|
+
{
|
|
214
|
+
"id": "EVAL-NOT-FOUND",
|
|
215
|
+
"type": "unanswerable",
|
|
216
|
+
"question": "这个知识包能判断消防喷淋系统联动验收吗?",
|
|
217
|
+
"expectedStatus": "not_found",
|
|
218
|
+
"expectedApplicability": "need_context",
|
|
219
|
+
"expectedClauseIds": [],
|
|
220
|
+
"mustCiteSourceVersion": false,
|
|
221
|
+
"expectedNotesContains": ["未命中"]
|
|
222
|
+
},
|
|
223
|
+
{
|
|
224
|
+
"id": "EVAL-CONFLICT",
|
|
225
|
+
"type": "conflict",
|
|
226
|
+
"question": "专家意见和现场记录版本不一致时能否自动放行?",
|
|
227
|
+
"expectedStatus": "conflict",
|
|
228
|
+
"expectedApplicability": "need_context",
|
|
229
|
+
"expectedClauseIds": ["CLAUSE-CONFLICT-REVIEW"],
|
|
230
|
+
"mustCiteSourceVersion": true,
|
|
231
|
+
"expectedNotesContains": ["人工复核"]
|
|
232
|
+
},
|
|
233
|
+
{
|
|
234
|
+
"id": "EVAL-INAPPLICABLE",
|
|
235
|
+
"type": "version_mismatch",
|
|
236
|
+
"question": "高支模方案是否应检查计算书?",
|
|
237
|
+
"inputSourceVersion": "SYN-OLD",
|
|
238
|
+
"expectedStatus": "inapplicable",
|
|
239
|
+
"expectedApplicability": "not_applicable",
|
|
240
|
+
"expectedClauseIds": [],
|
|
241
|
+
"mustCiteSourceVersion": false,
|
|
242
|
+
"expectedNotesContains": ["版本"]
|
|
243
|
+
}
|
|
244
|
+
],
|
|
245
|
+
"review": {
|
|
246
|
+
"humanReviewer": "Synthetic reviewer",
|
|
247
|
+
"reviewedAt": "2026-06-19",
|
|
248
|
+
"status": "reviewed",
|
|
249
|
+
"notes": "合成样板已覆盖 found / not_found / conflict / inapplicable / need_context,不代表真实规范结论。"
|
|
250
|
+
}
|
|
251
|
+
}
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 复核记录
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
| 项 | 状态 | 证据 | 处理建议 | 负责人 |
|
|
4
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
5
|
+
| 来源授权 | reviewed | synthetic-sample | 仅用于样板验证 | Synthetic reviewer |
|
|
6
|
+
| 条文拆解 | reviewed | CLAUSE-DEEP-EXCAVATION / CLAUSE-HIGH-FORMWORK / CLAUSE-CRANE-LIFTING / CLAUSE-CONFLICT-REVIEW | 真实项目必须替换为授权条文 | Synthetic reviewer |
|
|
7
|
+
| 查询覆盖 | reviewed | evalQuestions | 覆盖 found / not_found / conflict / inapplicable / need_context | Synthetic reviewer |
|
|
8
|
+
| 发布边界 | reviewed | dataBoundary | 不代表真实规范或合规结论 | Synthetic reviewer |
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 知识来源登记
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
| 来源 ID | 名称 | 类型 | 版本 | 路径 / URL | 授权状态 | hash | 复核状态 | 风险 |
|
|
4
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
5
|
+
| SRC-SYN-SCHEME | 合成专项施工方案审查口径 | synthetic-standard-excerpt | SYN-2026.01 | source-register.md | synthetic-sample | sha256:synthetic-scheme-review | reviewed | 合成样板不可作为真实规范依据 |
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## 数据说明
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
本样板全部为虚构 / 合成内容,只用于验证 AIOS Knowledge Pack 的结构、查询和评估门禁。
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 标准 / 规范登记
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
| 标准 ID | 名称 | 编号 | 版本 | 地区 | 专业 | 生效状态 | 来源 ID | 审查用途 |
|
|
4
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
5
|
+
| STD-SYN-SCHEME | 合成专项施工方案审查标准 | SYN-SCHEME-2026 | SYN-2026.01 | CN | construction | sample_only | SRC-SYN-SCHEME | Reference Runtime 样板 |
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## 维护规则
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
此样板不对应真实规范,任何生产项目必须替换为授权来源、真实版本和人工复核记录。
|
|
@@ -42,15 +42,19 @@
|
|
|
42
42
|
| 建筑行业 RAG、GraphRAG、MCP、Memory、Tool Calling | Daedalus | AI 研发工程师 |
|
|
43
43
|
| Prompt / Skill 输出对比、weak/basic/runtime 三栏评测 | Daedalus | AI 研发工程师 |
|
|
44
44
|
| 建筑行业项目代码修改、脚本执行、测试、文档生成 | Hephaestus | 受控执行官 |
|
|
45
|
+
| 工程标书 / 技术标生成、改写和历史素材复用 | Mason | 工程总工,使用 `aios-tender-write`,生成后回到 `aios-commercial-tender` 复核 |
|
|
46
|
+
| 专项施工方案生成、改写和历史方案复用 | Vitruvius | 建筑数字化专家,使用 `aios-scheme-write`,生成后回到 `aios-construction-scheme` 复核 |
|
|
45
47
|
|
|
46
48
|
## 升级规则
|
|
47
49
|
|
|
48
50
|
- 涉及长期架构、服务边界、数据模型:升级给 Atlas。
|
|
49
51
|
- 涉及立项、定位、商业目标、范围取舍:升级给 Janus。
|
|
50
52
|
- 涉及页面方案、工作台体验、交互状态和前端实现交接:升级给 Janus,并使用 `aios-design`。
|
|
51
|
-
- 涉及多模块交付、任务依赖、发布顺序:升级给 Mason。
|
|
52
|
-
-
|
|
53
|
+
- 涉及多模块交付、任务依赖、发布顺序:升级给 Mason。
|
|
54
|
+
- 涉及标书、技术标、投标响应章节生成或历史标书素材复用:升级给 Mason,并使用 `aios-tender-write`;生成后必须交给 `aios-commercial-tender` 审核门禁。
|
|
55
|
+
- 涉及权限、安全、生产发布、AI 生成代码:升级给 Argus。
|
|
53
56
|
- 涉及行业规范、BIM / IFC、审图语义:升级给 Vitruvius。
|
|
57
|
+
- 涉及专项施工方案、施工技术措施、交底材料生成或历史方案素材复用:升级给 Vitruvius,并使用 `aios-scheme-write`;生成后必须交给 `aios-construction-scheme` 审核门禁。
|
|
54
58
|
- 涉及结构力学、荷载、边界条件、FEM 或结构计算工具链:升级给 Euclid。
|
|
55
59
|
- 涉及 RAG、GraphRAG、MCP、Memory、Tool:升级给 Daedalus。
|
|
56
60
|
- 涉及提示词效果、weak/basic 对照、真实 Skill 输出比较或是否应沉淀为 Skill:升级给 Daedalus,并使用 `aios-prompt-compare`。
|