RubyGems - foundational_lib - Versions diffs - 1.0 - Mend

foundational_lib 1.0

Files changed (529) hide show

data/Articles/2.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta charset="UTF-8">
+<title>Computer Art and Computer Science</title>
+<link rel='stylesheet' href='css.css'>
+</head>
+<body>
+<h1>Computer Art and Computer Science</h1>
+<h2>By G.C.</h2>
+<p>There is a great deal of difference between “Computer Art” and
+“Computer Science.” What most people who call themselves "computer
+scientists" do is “computer art” &ndash; they don't operate in accordance
+with high mathematical principles in terms of human operation.</p>
+<p>True “computer science” would be something like &ndash; finding the
+top 10 or 15 categories of a string replace algorithm and making an
+optimally fast function for each one, in each different categories,
+platforms, constraints, circumstances. There is a minimal
+set of categories, and one can optimize for each one and have an
+ideal algorithm for each one.</p>
+<p>Some examples would be:</p>
+<p>The ideal, pure best one if you have memory constraints; the
+ideal, pure best one if you don't have memory constraints and care
+about performance; the ideal, pure best one if you know the length
+of the strings before; etc.</p>
+<p>This would be scientific because it would be in accordance with
+high level mathematics &ndash; mathematics is a science.</p>
+<p>This is NOT what most programmers do. Most programmers do ad hoc
+for-the-situation solutions because they are operating “in a job”
+“to get paid” "in accordance with the [mainstream engineering
+establishment] “system.”</p>
+<p>This is dangerous and untenable for many, many reasons.</p>
+<p>Here are some issues with this.</p>
+<ul>
+<li style="padding:12px;">It's illogical art &ndash; that could cause major crashes and issues,
+and kill people.</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">
+<p style='text-indent:0px;'>It promotes illogic &ndash; it promotes nonsense and chaos &ndash; which
+most programmers are immersed in &ndash; just have a look at reddit.</p>
+<p style='text-indent:0px;'>Most programmers are a combination of the most vile human
+qualities that could possibly exist in every aspect.</p>
+<p style='text-indent:0px;'>This does not have to be the case and should not be the
+case.</p>
+<p style='text-indent:0px;'>Indeed, programmers ought to be the most able and most powerful
+people on the planet.</p>
+</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">It's slow. Instead of a C solution or an assembly solution,
+they might use a scripting language, which might make it be
+100-1000x slower, depending on the circumstances.</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">It's impure. There's an elegance to doing something “properly.”
+This is not it.</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">It violates don't-repeat-yourself and don't-reinvent-the-wheel
+principles.</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">
+It wastes everyone's time &ndash; unless you are a programmer just for
+the sake of a job, in which case, I unequivocally don't support you
+and support the entrepreneurs and dynamic individuals involved
+instead. I could never imagine thinking like this.
+</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">It's slow and is morally poor to all parties involved because
+you are coming up with a solution that runs perhaps hundreds of
+times less efficiently and with hundreds of times more power than
+it should.</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">It's not flexible. If you want to change one thing, your slow
+solution will take 200 times longer and you can't play around with
+it as much. This is not ideal.</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">It doesn't help others. See Richard Stallman's material on
+this, etc.</li><div class='article_link'><a href="1.html">Previous article</a>
+<a href="3.html">Next article</a></div>
+</body>
+</html>

data/Articles/3.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title>How to Deprogram Others From the Mainstream Engineering Establishment &ndash; Or How to Deprogram Yourself (Part 1)</title> <link rel='stylesheet' href='css.css'> </head> <body> <h1>How to Deprogram Others From the Mainstream Engineering Establishment &ndash; Or How to Deprogram Yourself (Part 1)</h1>
+<h2><i>And in so doing, gain love, empathy, compassion, gratitude, a sharing mindset, and live up to the true nature of your moral and ethical foundation.</i></h2> <h2>By G.C.</h2>
+<p>I use the word “Deprogram,” quite literally, for the Mainstream Engineering Establishment is more extreme, more influential, and more wide-pervasive than any other “Cult” or religious movement. Actually, it's more powerful than Christianity and Islam combined, and dominates in society over any religion or ideology. To be clear &ndash; it is the mainstream ideology that is put in place by force and which people are compelled to submit to through economic and social duress.</p>
+<p>Actually, the vices that it creates, create many of the so-called “issues” with mainstream organized religion itself. Mostly, those vices are just its vices &ndash; the people that create the ships, create the swords, the masons, the manufacturers, the engineers &ndash; have a long secretive and proprietary tradition of hiding things, manipulating others, and abusing circumstances for their advantage. It's hard to consider that priests alone could harm others, it is only in the presence of the people that actually create the objects we use, the technologies we use, have the know-how to make them, and set up our modern world, that high powers go corrupt &ndash; and, indeed, they give the means by which TO become corrupt. And so things have gone through history. But the same Greek and Latin traditions remain &ndash; from two millennia ago, where slavery was rampant and when there were dictators. <i>The rights of all men</i> &ndash; was a foreign concept.</p>
+<p>One of the recent things that has happened was that they pitted people against religion in the West, presumably to divide people and conquer people. Such certainly happened &ndash; millions of people died in the 30 Years War and all of the religious conquests.</p>
+<p>This has led to an ideological hatred of religion &ndash; divorced from reason.</p>
+<p>Anything new that they have not yelled at, “debated” thoroughly &ndash; they brand a cult or something. The have created a notion of “secularism” whereby they seek to divide the minds of man and separate the ideals of engineering with the norms of a religious context &ndash; not on the basis of reason but on the basis of ideology. There is a fake notion of “science” &ndash; that “everyone knows everything always” &ndash; which is unequivocally not true, readily debunked, promulgated by the most secret and proprietary individuals &ndash; hypocritically &ndash; is more of an academic propaganda line or an opiate for the weak than something that would be sincerely taken seriously by any group of individuals. This plainly cannot be true &ndash; and this pseudo-skepticism is very harmful. “Science” is not a glittery thing that exists everywhere, catering to the brightest minds with a cute hugging face &ndash; having your Safety and Security and best interests in mind. No, it is not that way.</p>
+<p>Going back to the ideas of “Cults” &ndash; anything new since the chaos they had created is branded separate “from the collective” &ndash; the notion of “universalism” is abused on multiple fronts. They act as if their angry, vitriolic assertions apply for all &ndash; that some people are “always bad,” “always degraded,” “cannot” do things, should “never” talk to someone, should “never” show compassion, empathy, or brotherhood with a given individual, should “never” be close to an individual, should “never” support someone with money, etc.</p>
+<p>They brand anything new a “Cult” &ndash; the Mormon movement, the Scientology movement, MAGA-ism, woke-ism, anything (and the mainstream engineering establishment is responsible for BOTH anti-MAGA AND anti-woke hysteria).</p>
+<p>In the context of Scientology, the mainstream engineering establishment has perverted the foundation of that body of findings, has TURNED it into a religion from non-religion, both literally and metaphorically, and, indeed, maybe many criticisms are merited, but these criticisms are closet criticisms of the mainstream engineering establishment itself in addition. The “institutional” criticisms are categorically irrelevant &ndash; Scientology is a bunch of findings about the mind &ndash; fucked up and bastardized by the mainstream engineering establishment &ndash; relegated to a “religious context” (forced into it) &ndash; because the mainstream engineering establishment wants to be “separate” &ndash; wants separation of peoples and a lack of unity. They cannot justify this based on reason or any moral framework or even common sense, so it is done through propaganda, sensationalism, and outright dominance (as in, if you do a scientific study, we will reject you. If you support Engineering (the ideal), we will reject you, fire you, you will lose your livelihood, your wife will leave you, your kids will leave you, your friends will argue with you).</p>
+<p>Here are some Invalid criticisms:</p>
+<ul>
+<li style="padding:12px;">It's a cult! (Vitriol, sensationalism, superficial, no-science, no-nuance, non-scholarly, unequivocally anti-empirical, not wanting things to be tested in general)</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">"The organization" does _____________ (!!!!!) &ndash; Irrelevant. This is worse than people whining about COVID vaccine (I actually heard, THIS IS NOT SCIENCE!!!!!! THIS IS SCIENTOLOGY!!!!!! IT'S NOT SCIENCE. [about COVID]) &ndash; (reasons for invalid criticism &ndash; lacking empathy, hating Enlightenment values and science)</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">"It cant be done because it's (so) secret[ive]" &ndash; Now, this is just disinformation &ndash; an outright lie &ndash; all the information is readily available to be tested and can be torrented &ndash; there is a minority that cannot &ndash; such is not important or foundational. I should reiterate this likes 10 times &ndash; however, right now, I'm not focusing on the advocacy of scientific integrity&mdash;a worthwhile cause &ndash; in the case of COVID, in the case of Scientology, in the case of engineering&mdash;but, in this article, am mainly talking about Deprogramming from the Mainstream Scientific Establishment Cult.</li>
+</ul>
+<p>Here are some Valid comments.</p>
+<ul>
+<li style="padding:12px;">"Alright, we have here a body of findings about the mind, let's see the efficacy of it &ndash; force a group discourse on it &ndash; stymie stupidity and sensationalism, change bits if we have to, not give a damn about any legal or copyright fake-worries. See how it applies to Biotech. Get Vivek Ramaswamy to talk about it."</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">"Hmm, okay, so apparently there's a building where there is technology based upon NASA tech to train astronauts &ndash; this is unequivocally true &ndash; and yet the mainstream news media is mostly not talking about this. Okay, let's redefine, in a non-partisan way, our scholarly interrelationship between Religion and Engineering &ndash; the old interpretation is outmoded now &ndash; unequivocally &ndash; it is old. NASA and Religion. Hmm."</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">"Let's try to debunk it wholly and take the useful findings and increase mental health care for all. Crack down on it wholly, outlaw it, change psychiatry to include tech based on NASA tech (modern Scientology tech as has existed since the 1970s)."</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">Secular humanists maybe want to outlaw it? Fine. You can do that. But, secular humanists, as distinct from the mainstream engineering establishment, probably wouldn't want to do this &ndash; it would be too “effective” and “definitive.” Instead, such people would want sensationalism to “win” and everyone to be divorced from reason. But this is another argument &ndash; and not my main argument here (my criticism of the mainstream engineering establishment &ndash; which is not the same thing as secular humanism &ndash; at all &ndash; however, it perverts secular humanists and makes them neither “secular” nor “humanist” &ndash; and ruins the philosophy, as pure as it might look at first glance. The issues that have ruined secularism humanism or “atheism” are the same issues that have ruined Scientology &ndash; this perverse coupling with the mainstream engineering establishment. And both get tons of hate and are actually in the same camp, whether they admit it or not, in many, many ways.</li>
+<li style="padding:12px;">Another alternative is to not have an issue with it and let it grow and take over the world &ndash; the church, specifically. This could work. Or it could be outlawed and secular humanists could be given dictate over the affairs of the West &ndash; this could also work &ndash; but ONLY if it's findings are tested and used &ndash; and not divorced by the severely mentally challenged or full-autistic. Enough retards squirm or get introverted on this subject, they cannot be supported. Science should be science.</li>
+</ul>
+<p><big>So that's an essay about “Cults.” In the following article we will talk about deprogramming from this cult &ndash; the mainstream engineering establishment &ndash; which is far worse than Scientology or Atheism or Islam or Christianity or Wokeism or MAGA-ism or Jim Jones or actual death-cults &ndash; <i>far worse</i>.</big></p><div class='article_link'><a href="2.html">Previous article</a>
+<a href="4.html">Next article</a></div>
+</body>
+</html>

data/Articles/4.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta charset="UTF-8">
+<title>How to Deprogram Others From the Mainstream Engineering Establishment &ndash; Or How to Deprogram Yourself (Part 2)</title>
+<link rel='stylesheet' href='css.css'>
+</head>
+<body>
+<h1>How to Deprogram Others From the Mainstream Engineering Establishment &ndash; Or How to Deprogram Yourself (Part 2)</h1>
+<h2><i>And in so doing, gain love, empathy, compassion, gratitude, a sharing mindset, and live up to the true nature of your moral and ethical foundation.</i></h2>
+<h2>By G.C.</h2>
+<div style='text-align: center'><h2>Preface</h2></div>
+<br><br>
+<div style='text-align: center'><strong>YOU DON'T HAVE TO FOLLOW SPECIFICATIONS OR “REQUIREMENTS” &ndash; EVER.</strong></div>
+<br><br>
+<p>And I mean this an unequivocally and thoroughgoingly as possible &ndash; you can let bridges collapse even. I'm serious.</p>
+<p>This is all in line with having the best reasoning ability. If it is more reasonable to not follow “rules,” then do not follow “rules” &ndash; as the case may be &ndash; in line with Reason.</p>
+<p>This is one of the biggest traps that exist.</p>
+<p>And all some people think with is “Requirements” “Projects” [Circumstance A], [Circumstance B], [Circumstance C], “I'm in a scripting environment,” “I'm in a Cents environment,” “I'm in terrain with an unstable foundation,” “I ....”</p>
+<br><br>
+<div style='text-align: center'><strong>People get MIRED down into significances, into details, into the unimportant.</strong></div>
+<br><br>
+<br>
+<p>And then they die without having paid attention to anything important.</p>
+<p>Many think they can't.</p>
+<strong><p>YOU CAN.</p>
+<p>OKAY?</p>
+<p>YOU CAN.</p></strong>
+<p>YOU CAN BASE YOUR LIFE AROUND IMPORTANT THINGS. YOU DON'T HAVE TO ONLY FOCUS ON YOUR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING OR SOFTWARE ENGINEERING JOB.</p>
+<p>Or whatever it is.</p>
+<p>Snap out of it.</p>
+<p>You can face the big picture. And it's Okay if you're poor.</p>
+<hr>
+<div style='text-align: center'><h3>How to Deprogram Others From the Mainstream Engineering Establishment &ndash; Or How to Deprogram Yourself</h3></div>
+<strong>
+<br><br>
+<p>Here is the technique or methodology.</p></strong>
+<p>Also, Best-advice from cult-deprogrammers probably is quite valid here.</p>
+<p>Be gentle. If there's one thing to do &ndash; be gentle. No coercion should be used on oneself or others. Be gentle.</p>
+<p>Be gradual. One can even be iterative &ndash; doing certain portions slowly, and doing things again and again.</p>
+<p>It is very imperative that people understand that.</p>
+<br><br><br>
+<strong>Here is the list.</strong>
+<br><br>
+<ol>
+<li style='padding:12px;'>Recognize that you Exist. (Personal epistemological, almost Descartian thing here. Recognize that you ARE.)</li>
+<li style='padding:12px;'>Have individual agency irrespective of and separate from others</li>
+<li style='padding:12px;'>Recognize they have choice To Be or Not Be an Engineer at will, and reject all
+ qualities and accept all qualities of being an Engineer at will.</li>
+<li style='padding:12px;'>Be completely willing to make a humongous mess or not make a humongous mess at will
+in their creations (people have issues on this point, actually neurotic
+obsessions on this point &ndash; they are only somewhat justified, usually it's just
+immaturity and acting like a grade-schooler &ndash; a lack of personal maturity)</li>
+<li style='padding:12px;'>Be completely willing to create in groups creations that would be dynamic, but
+potentially very dangerous. For example &ndash; the creation of a laser beam that
+could be used for mass change (hypothetical example).</li>
+<li style='padding:12px;'>Be completely willing to have personal financial ruin &ndash; and to have ones wife,
+husband, family and kids be impoverished along with one &ndash; This point might be
+hard for some people &ndash; but it's a high state. Independence of financial obsession
+leads to integrity.</li>
+<li style='padding:12px;'>Be willing to fight &ndash; metaphorically and literally &ndash; physically &ndash; to fight for good,
+to fight against what is not right.</li>
+<li style='padding:12px;'>To increase your analytical abilities and creations above the status quo, for all,
+collectively. The mainstream engineering establishment doesn't understand GNU
+principles &ndash; it doesn't understand Judeo-Christian principles &ndash; it doesn't understand
+“secular humanist principles” &ndash; it doesn't understand any moral principles.</li>
+<li style='padding:12px;'>Find what you truly believe &ndash; philosophically. It doesn't matter where you're from,
+think of the Beatles or Steve Jobs &ndash; they went to India and had
+a spiritual experience. Find your true self &ndash; but only on the basis of Reason and analytical abilities,
+if you base this on just emotion, your life will be wasted.
+</li>
+</ol><div class='article_link'><a href="3.html">Previous article</a>
+<a href="5.html">Next article</a></div>
+</body>
+</html>

data/Articles/5.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta charset="UTF-8">
+<title>Analysis of the Broken “Engineering Establishment Mindset”</title>
+<link rel='stylesheet' href='css.css'>
+</head>
+<body>
+<h1>Analysis of the Broken “Engineering Establishment Mindset”</h1>
+<h2>By G.C.</h2>
+<p>The mainstream engineer is unequivocally in a very, very broken
+culture.</p>
+<p>This culture is leading to many significant problems in the
+world (see also: <a href="1.html"><strong>The Problem
+with the Mainstream Engineering Establishment</strong></a> on this
+blog/site.)</p>
+<p>But what is their mindset and why is it so dangerous and why
+must it be opposed to absolutely forcefully and vehemently?</p>
+<p>To start with, in no way is it democratic and in no way is it
+inspired by reason and French- and American-inspired Enlightenment
+Values.</p>
+<p>It is based on authoritarian conformity. And as such, it is
+based on upholding nonsense traditions &ndash; I am not using such as an
+insult, but by “nonsense,” I mean, a lack of high level reason in
+accordance with mathematics or trying to solve a high-level problem
+(see: <a href="1.html"><strong>The Problem with the
+Mainstream Engineering Establishment</strong></a>).</p>
+<p>It upholds nonsense, people build new skyscrapers while everyone
+at half the height of the skyscraper and lower is burning &ndash; burning
+with thousands of problems, problems the mainstream engineering
+establishment is knowingly creating and supporting and is cognizant
+of.</p>
+<p>The people in charge in the mainstream engineering establishment
+know of and actively WANT these problems, because these problems
+lead to submission and conformity to them. Engineers are people who
+plan and create our world &ndash; it is created flawed on purpose be the
+complacent and the deeply antidemocratic and corrupt.</p>
+<p>The only solution, because speaking is unlikely to work &ndash; is to
+fight back, with literal force and violence, ideally in a
+macro-organized way, by means of communication channels such as the
+internet, in order to fight back at this. Occupy Wall Street is a
+disgrace, and perhaps, a conspiracy theorist might even think was
+staged. This movement didn't do much to fight back.</p>
+<h2>Now, this is a big thing:</h2>
+<p><strong>When people assume conformity, when a man assumes his
+mistress must have sex with him, and she is socially pressured by
+him and feels near-powerless to disagree or express dissent &ndash; when
+there is group agreement about “the way of the world” or the "way
+something works", one should know this:</strong></p>
+<p><strong>When violence is exerted, it acts as an effective
+substitute for that which one is socially told they cannot
+express.</strong></p>
+<p>This goes for liberals or conservatives.</p>
+<p>If the woman slapped her would-be rapist, if the slave attacks
+his slavemaster, if the common folk attacks the engineer or the
+engineering establishment with force or a show of force, it
+effectively opens the door to an increased range of discourse and a
+more democratic set of circumstances. This, then, opens the door to
+an equitable, fair, democratic process.</p>
+<p>This is why things like January 6 or liberal protests can be
+valuable and effective. Because liberals and conservatives try to
+shut each other up, and sometimes people's eyes need to be
+opened.</p>
+<p>It is a conformity-culture, and this is all they know, it really
+is and if you speak out they yell at you. It is important to ALWAYS
+step over them and get the last word &ndash; like whack-a-mole.</p>
+<p>Indeed, these individuals are vermin and deserve to be gassed or
+killed unequivocally. Not from a partisan standpoint, but on the
+basis of mathematics and reason.</p>
+<p>Let's be quite candid here: There is just no point to
+working-your-way-up and becoming a billionaire in Biotech or some
+field or whatever, and acting like a gleaming ray of light, when
+the same vileness would continue. They are not listening to you.
+They don't want to listen to you. And you will be complicit in not
+fighting back, this will be YOUR sin, not necessarily theirs, and
+your complacency will be your biggest fault. Then, if or when a
+nuclear bomb gets dropped, your family might die, your business
+might crash and go into pieces, all because you were being "Mr.
+Clean" or “Ms. Clean” and trying to not get a criminal record or
+trying to not get legal charges. This will have been your fault.
+<i>Be willing to get messy.</i> Be willing to be defiant. Be
+willing to go into poverty, have your wife leave you, be hungry. I
+have certain been hungry on many occasions. A "gleaming beacon of
+smiles" isn't saving anyone, it's lying to people. <strong>It's
+lying to people.</strong> And these smiley types deserve, quite
+possibly, terrible treatment, the law in many cases is backwards.
+It rewards people who don't fight for good causes, and penalizes
+people who act in a heroic fashion. Whatever you think of them,
+think of Martin Luther King Jr. or Nelson Mandela. These people got
+punished by the law for trying to make the world a better place. I
+also got punished by the law for trying to make the world a better
+place. And so should you. The legal system is rigged and unfair. It
+rewards criminals and complacency. It punishes free speech and
+fighting back. It punishes doing the right thing.</p>
+<p>The victims of this culture act in the following ways</p>
+<p>They take on a “dorks” disposition, the culture degrades people,
+and makes people feel like, both individually, socially,
+societally, and epistemologically:</p>
+<ul>
+<li style="padding:4px;">failures</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">retards</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">3rd graders</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">autistic people</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">outcasts</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">people who lack volition</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">a member of a hivemind</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">an anonymous agency-lacking entity</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">a dark secret [something]</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">a member of the modern day agenda, apolitical, submitting to
+what is new unthinkingly</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">second place</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">a loser</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">a pariah</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">a nerd</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">a geek</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">one who must unthinkingly accept a submissive second place
+role</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">a victim</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">one who supports nonsense (e.g., video games, etc.)</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">one who makes a large number of versions of a given thing,
+divorced from a mathematical or logical sense of idealism or
+perfectionism</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">non-perfectionists</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">non-perfect people</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">collectively ruined</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">collectively suicidal</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">non-ideological</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">non-choosing</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">mainstream-guidance-accepting</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">tribal</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">cliquish</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">childish</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">arrogant</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">non-individual</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">rude</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">vile</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">asshole-like</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">nonconstructively combative</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">irresponsible</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">supportive of “over democratization” (i.e., immediate hive mind
+rule)</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">a listener</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">a member of a culture that always listens (and if others don't
+listen to a given data point or statement, they degrade them or
+fight them)</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">a member of a culture that values a working sample over any
+semblance of pragmatism or idealism &ndash; someone who degrades someone
+or acts like an asshole [or acts superior in some deluded way] to
+someone if they don't have a working sample</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">a member of a culture that assumes that all other people act
+like them, and if they don't, they try to fight them or degrade
+them [or act superior in some deluded way]</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">a member of a culture that assumes individual mind and
+character degradation and “emplacement” [putting the individual
+into their place] of all individuals, and tries to demand such if
+the situation is different [or closet-demands it, they get confused
+if they can't socially demand it, fortunately the current society's
+average is better than this]</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">doesn't understand, sympathize with, empathize with, or love,
+concepts like dynamism, vitality, fighting against the odds
+successfully, success itself, or any concept that could be
+conflated with good circumstances or liberation from this
+culture</li>
+<li style="padding:4px;">And others qualities.</li>
+</ul><div class='article_link'><a href="4.html">Previous article</a>
+<a href="6.html">Next article</a></div>
+</body>
+</html>

data/Articles/6.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta charset="UTF-8">
+<title>The Myth of the Perfect Child</title>
+<link rel='stylesheet' href='css.css'>
+</head>
+<body>
+<h1><span>The Myth of the Perfect Child</span></h1>
+<h2>By G.C.</h2>
+<p>Parents think that they want to have a perfect child who will be
+raised “perfectly” and follow all the norms and be squeaky clean
+and follow all the rules and become a doctor, lawyer, or
+engineer.</p>
+<p>This is highly deluded.</p>
+<p>Indeed, it might be worth it, potentially, to just not have the
+child in the first place.</p>
+<p>This world is horribly corrupt. Raising a kid in this broken
+world is very dangerous. Moreover, you're raising a sociopath or
+quasi-sociopath. Anyone who follows the status quo of the school
+system is likely half-broken if not fully broken.</p>
+<p>It is NOT a good thing to raise a child who is not a fighter. It
+is NOT a good thing to raise a child who “agrees” constantly, and
+conforms to what his teachers say constantly. It is NOT a good
+thing to raise a child who doesn't care about high mathematics and
+reason and high philosophy.</p>
+<p>One should raise an idealist, but that would certainly make
+supporting themselves and raising a family more difficult if they
+are genuinely candid.</p>
+<p>It is certainly a shame &ndash; the degree of mania in the society
+right now.</p>
+<p>It makes the world almost unlivable if one wants to retain ones
+integrity.</p>
+<p>It is possible but it will be a struggle.</p>
+<p>I think Stallman is a great example for many people of someone
+who retains their integrity through anything. I have as well.</p><div class='article_link'><a href="5.html">Previous article</a>
+<a href="7.html">Next article</a></div>
+</body>
+</html>

data/Articles/7.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta charset="UTF-8">
+<title>Narcissism and Arrogance</title>
+<link rel='stylesheet' href='css.css'>
+</head>
+<body>
+<h1><span>Narcissism and Arrogance</span></h1>
+<h2>By G.C.</h2>
+<p>The world is filled with a great deal of narcissism and
+arrogance. A lot of the time people <i>HORRIBLY</i> misuse the word
+“narcissism,” as if it had any weight for anyone and was something
+other than a symbol of degradation, domination and human
+labelling.</p>
+<p>Such is certainly present in the mainstream engineering
+establishment, even though they don't admit it.</p>
+<p>It is filled with a bunch of people who act like their the only
+ones in the world, and who are asocial.</p><div class='article_link'><a href="6.html">Previous article</a>
+<a href="8.html">Next article</a></div>
+</body>
+</html>

data/Articles/8.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta charset="UTF-8">
+<title>Logical Direction</title>
+<link rel='stylesheet' href='css.css'>
+</head>
+<body>
+<h1><span>Logical Direction</span></h1>
+<h2>By G.C.</h2>
+People need to think of things more logically.
+<br><br><br><br>
+<table style=''>
+<tr>
+<th>Postulates, Goals and Problems</th>
+<th>Logical sequence</th>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 1 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>We exist and we think</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 2 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Our existence and thought is observed to be imperilled &ndash; by
+us</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='goal'>Sub Goal 1 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Survival and persistence and existing &ndash; to the highest
+level</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='problem'>Sub Problem 1 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Now we have the problem of how to bring this about</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 2 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>We can operate, but our operation is limited (by whatever
+factors)</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 3 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>We have made machines.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='goal'>Sub Goal 2 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>We should increase our level of potential operation to its
+highest level, resulting in the highest level of general
+Ability.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='problem'>Sub Problem 2 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Now, we need to figure out how to execute this.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 4 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Machines can increase our level of operation, our level of
+techne.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 5 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Machines have limits themselves</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 6 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>We should maximize machines to increase our level of operation,
+within ethical limits perhaps, aligning with our main real goals
+and subgoals (which are not necessarily all stated here)</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 7 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Machines are limited by as fast as they can move.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='goal'>Sub Goal 3 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Therefore, we need to figure out how to maximize machines to
+their highest potential</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='problem'>Sub Problem 3 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Our problem, then, is to remove from existence all things that
+get in the way of having machines operate well, which, in turn,
+aligns with our goals of being able to operate, which in turn
+aligns with our goal of surviving well.</td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+<p>It is very important that people evaluate all the choices they
+make.</p>
+<p>For example:</p>
+<i>
+<p>Why do I have a cat? Is it logical? Am I weak?</p>
+<p>Why have I been working this career for 40 years? All my money
+is going to waste and I'm the CEO. Things are going to hell, and I
+feel miserable even though I have the best pillow.</p>
+<p>Am I safe?</p>
+<p>How do I get less overwhelmed by my friends? They are too
+harsh.</p>
+<p>Joe is not allowing me to speak ever. What do I do?</p>
+<p>I have this great thing and the mainstream engineering
+establishment is refusing to converse about it, let alone monetize
+it to help people's bottom lines. What do I do?</p>
+<p>Why do I keep using this slow scripting language when it's not
+ideal and makes no sense?</p>
+<p>Why do I keep treating my peers bad?</p>
+<p>Who is in charge of creating robots? Will they destroy us? Can
+we have a lighthearted friendly chat with these blokes?</p>
+<p>What's the point of becoming a millionaire at the expense of
+everything?</p>
+<p>Are nukes going to destroy us all? Who controls them? Can we
+chat with them?</p>
+<p>Can AI enhance dynamic individuality?</i> (This is a good one.)</p><div class='article_link'><a href="7.html">Previous article</a>
+<a href="9.html">Next article</a></div>
+</body>
+</html>