foundational_lib 1.0

data/Articles_MD/2.html.md

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+---
+title: Computer Art and Computer Science
+---
+
+Computer Art and Computer Science
+=================================
+
+By G.C.
+-------
+
+There is a great deal of difference between "Computer Art" and "Computer
+Science." What most people who call themselves \"computer scientists\"
+do is "computer art" -- they don\'t operate in accordance with high
+mathematical principles in terms of human operation.
+
+True "computer science" would be something like -- finding the top 10 or
+15 categories of a string replace algorithm and making an optimally fast
+function for each one, in each different categories, platforms,
+constraints, circumstances. There is a minimal set of categories, and
+one can optimize for each one and have an ideal algorithm for each one.
+
+Some examples would be:
+
+The ideal, pure best one if you have memory constraints; the ideal, pure
+best one if you don\'t have memory constraints and care about
+performance; the ideal, pure best one if you know the length of the
+strings before; etc.
+
+This would be scientific because it would be in accordance with high
+level mathematics -- mathematics is a science.
+
+This is NOT what most programmers do. Most programmers do ad hoc
+for-the-situation solutions because they are operating "in a job" "to
+get paid" \"in accordance with the \[mainstream engineering
+establishment\] "system."
+
+This is dangerous and untenable for many, many reasons.
+
+Here are some issues with this.
+
+It\'s illogical art -- that could cause major crashes and issues, and
+kill people.
+
+It promotes illogic -- it promotes nonsense and chaos -- which most
+programmers are immersed in -- just have a look at reddit.
+
+Most programmers are a combination of the most vile human qualities that
+could possibly exist in every aspect.
+
+This does not have to be the case and should not be the case.
+
+Indeed, programmers ought to be the most able and most powerful people
+on the planet.
+
+It\'s slow. Instead of a C solution or an assembly solution, they might
+use a scripting language, which might make it be 100-1000x slower,
+depending on the circumstances.
+
+It\'s impure. There\'s an elegance to doing something "properly." This
+is not it.
+
+It violates don\'t-repeat-yourself and don\'t-reinvent-the-wheel
+principles.
+
+It wastes everyone\'s time -- unless you are a programmer just for the
+sake of a job, in which case, I unequivocally don\'t support you and
+support the entrepreneurs and dynamic individuals involved instead. I
+could never imagine thinking like this.
+
+It\'s slow and is morally poor to all parties involved because you are
+coming up with a solution that runs perhaps hundreds of times less
+efficiently and with hundreds of times more power than it should.
+
+It\'s not flexible. If you want to change one thing, your slow solution
+will take 200 times longer and you can\'t play around with it as much.
+This is not ideal.
+
+It doesn\'t help others. See Richard Stallman\'s material on this, etc.
+
+::: {.article_link}
+[Previous article](1.html) [Next article](3.html)
+:::

data/Articles_MD/3.html.md

@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+---
+title: 'How to Deprogram Others From the Mainstream Engineering
+  Establishment -- Or How to Deprogram Yourself (Part 1)'
+---
+
+How to Deprogram Others From the Mainstream Engineering Establishment -- Or How to Deprogram Yourself (Part 1)
+==============================================================================================================
+
+*And in so doing, gain love, empathy, compassion, gratitude, a sharing mindset, and live up to the true nature of your moral and ethical foundation.*
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+By G.C.
+-------
+
+I use the word "Deprogram," quite literally, for the Mainstream
+Engineering Establishment is more extreme, more influential, and more
+wide-pervasive than any other "Cult" or religious movement. Actually,
+it\'s more powerful than Christianity and Islam combined, and dominates
+in society over any religion or ideology. To be clear -- it is the
+mainstream ideology that is put in place by force and which people are
+compelled to submit to through economic and social duress.
+
+Actually, the vices that it creates, create many of the so-called
+"issues" with mainstream organized religion itself. Mostly, those vices
+are just its vices -- the people that create the ships, create the
+swords, the masons, the manufacturers, the engineers -- have a long
+secretive and proprietary tradition of hiding things, manipulating
+others, and abusing circumstances for their advantage. It\'s hard to
+consider that priests alone could harm others, it is only in the
+presence of the people that actually create the objects we use, the
+technologies we use, have the know-how to make them, and set up our
+modern world, that high powers go corrupt -- and, indeed, they give the
+means by which TO become corrupt. And so things have gone through
+history. But the same Greek and Latin traditions remain -- from two
+millennia ago, where slavery was rampant and when there were dictators.
+*The rights of all men* -- was a foreign concept.
+
+One of the recent things that has happened was that they pitted people
+against religion in the West, presumably to divide people and conquer
+people. Such certainly happened -- millions of people died in the 30
+Years War and all of the religious conquests.
+
+This has led to an ideological hatred of religion -- divorced from
+reason.
+
+Anything new that they have not yelled at, "debated" thoroughly -- they
+brand a cult or something. The have created a notion of "secularism"
+whereby they seek to divide the minds of man and separate the ideals of
+engineering with the norms of a religious context -- not on the basis of
+reason but on the basis of ideology. There is a fake notion of "science"
+-- that "everyone knows everything always" -- which is unequivocally not
+true, readily debunked, promulgated by the most secret and proprietary
+individuals -- hypocritically -- is more of an academic propaganda line
+or an opiate for the weak than something that would be sincerely taken
+seriously by any group of individuals. This plainly cannot be true --
+and this pseudo-skepticism is very harmful. "Science" is not a glittery
+thing that exists everywhere, catering to the brightest minds with a
+cute hugging face -- having your Safety and Security and best interests
+in mind. No, it is not that way.
+
+Going back to the ideas of "Cults" -- anything new since the chaos they
+had created is branded separate "from the collective" -- the notion of
+"universalism" is abused on multiple fronts. They act as if their angry,
+vitriolic assertions apply for all -- that some people are "always bad,"
+"always degraded," "cannot" do things, should "never" talk to someone,
+should "never" show compassion, empathy, or brotherhood with a given
+individual, should "never" be close to an individual, should "never"
+support someone with money, etc.
+
+They brand anything new a "Cult" -- the Mormon movement, the Scientology
+movement, MAGA-ism, woke-ism, anything (and the mainstream engineering
+establishment is responsible for BOTH anti-MAGA AND anti-woke hysteria).
+
+In the context of Scientology, the mainstream engineering establishment
+has perverted the foundation of that body of findings, has TURNED it
+into a religion from non-religion, both literally and metaphorically,
+and, indeed, maybe many criticisms are merited, but these criticisms are
+closet criticisms of the mainstream engineering establishment itself in
+addition. The "institutional" criticisms are categorically irrelevant --
+Scientology is a bunch of findings about the mind -- fucked up and
+bastardized by the mainstream engineering establishment -- relegated to
+a "religious context" (forced into it) -- because the mainstream
+engineering establishment wants to be "separate" -- wants separation of
+peoples and a lack of unity. They cannot justify this based on reason or
+any moral framework or even common sense, so it is done through
+propaganda, sensationalism, and outright dominance (as in, if you do a
+scientific study, we will reject you. If you support Engineering (the
+ideal), we will reject you, fire you, you will lose your livelihood,
+your wife will leave you, your kids will leave you, your friends will
+argue with you).
+
+Here are some Invalid criticisms:
+
+-   It\'s a cult! (Vitriol, sensationalism, superficial, no-science,
+    no-nuance, non-scholarly, unequivocally anti-empirical, not wanting
+    things to be tested in general)
+-   \"The organization\" does \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ (!!!!!) --
+    Irrelevant. This is worse than people whining about COVID vaccine (I
+    actually heard, THIS IS NOT SCIENCE!!!!!! THIS IS SCIENTOLOGY!!!!!!
+    IT\'S NOT SCIENCE. \[about COVID\]) -- (reasons for invalid
+    criticism -- lacking empathy, hating Enlightenment values and
+    science)
+-   \"It cant be done because it\'s (so) secret\[ive\]\" -- Now, this is
+    just disinformation -- an outright lie -- all the information is
+    readily available to be tested and can be torrented -- there is a
+    minority that cannot -- such is not important or foundational. I
+    should reiterate this likes 10 times -- however, right now, I\'m not
+    focusing on the advocacy of scientific integrity---a worthwhile
+    cause -- in the case of COVID, in the case of Scientology, in the
+    case of engineering---but, in this article, am mainly talking about
+    Deprogramming from the Mainstream Scientific Establishment Cult.
+
+Here are some Valid comments.
+
+-   \"Alright, we have here a body of findings about the mind, let\'s
+    see the efficacy of it -- force a group discourse on it -- stymie
+    stupidity and sensationalism, change bits if we have to, not give a
+    damn about any legal or copyright fake-worries. See how it applies
+    to Biotech. Get Vivek Ramaswamy to talk about it.\"
+-   \"Hmm, okay, so apparently there\'s a building where there is
+    technology based upon NASA tech to train astronauts -- this is
+    unequivocally true -- and yet the mainstream news media is mostly
+    not talking about this. Okay, let\'s redefine, in a non-partisan
+    way, our scholarly interrelationship between Religion and
+    Engineering -- the old interpretation is outmoded now --
+    unequivocally -- it is old. NASA and Religion. Hmm.\"
+-   \"Let\'s try to debunk it wholly and take the useful findings and
+    increase mental health care for all. Crack down on it wholly, outlaw
+    it, change psychiatry to include tech based on NASA tech (modern
+    Scientology tech as has existed since the 1970s).\"
+-   Secular humanists maybe want to outlaw it? Fine. You can do that.
+    But, secular humanists, as distinct from the mainstream engineering
+    establishment, probably wouldn\'t want to do this -- it would be too
+    "effective" and "definitive." Instead, such people would want
+    sensationalism to "win" and everyone to be divorced from reason. But
+    this is another argument -- and not my main argument here (my
+    criticism of the mainstream engineering establishment -- which is
+    not the same thing as secular humanism -- at all -- however, it
+    perverts secular humanists and makes them neither "secular" nor
+    "humanist" -- and ruins the philosophy, as pure as it might look at
+    first glance. The issues that have ruined secularism humanism or
+    "atheism" are the same issues that have ruined Scientology -- this
+    perverse coupling with the mainstream engineering establishment. And
+    both get tons of hate and are actually in the same camp, whether
+    they admit it or not, in many, many ways.
+-   Another alternative is to not have an issue with it and let it grow
+    and take over the world -- the church, specifically. This could
+    work. Or it could be outlawed and secular humanists could be given
+    dictate over the affairs of the West -- this could also work -- but
+    ONLY if it\'s findings are tested and used -- and not divorced by
+    the severely mentally challenged or full-autistic. Enough retards
+    squirm or get introverted on this subject, they cannot be supported.
+    Science should be science.
+
+So that\'s an essay about "Cults." In the following article we will talk
+about deprogramming from this cult -- the mainstream engineering
+establishment -- which is far worse than Scientology or Atheism or Islam
+or Christianity or Wokeism or MAGA-ism or Jim Jones or actual
+death-cults -- *far worse*.
+
+::: {.article_link}
+[Previous article](2.html) [Next article](4.html)
+:::

data/Articles_MD/4.html.md

@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+---
+title: 'How to Deprogram Others From the Mainstream Engineering
+  Establishment -- Or How to Deprogram Yourself (Part 2)'
+---
+
+How to Deprogram Others From the Mainstream Engineering Establishment -- Or How to Deprogram Yourself (Part 2)
+==============================================================================================================
+
+*And in so doing, gain love, empathy, compassion, gratitude, a sharing mindset, and live up to the true nature of your moral and ethical foundation.*
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+By G.C.
+-------
+
+::: {style="text-align: center"}
+Preface
+-------
+:::
+
+\
+\
+
+::: {style="text-align: center"}
+**YOU DON\'T HAVE TO FOLLOW SPECIFICATIONS OR "REQUIREMENTS" -- EVER.**
+:::
+
+\
+\
+
+And I mean this an unequivocally and thoroughgoingly as possible -- you
+can let bridges collapse even. I\'m serious.
+
+This is all in line with having the best reasoning ability. If it is
+more reasonable to not follow "rules," then do not follow "rules" -- as
+the case may be -- in line with Reason.
+
+This is one of the biggest traps that exist.
+
+And all some people think with is "Requirements" "Projects"
+\[Circumstance A\], \[Circumstance B\], \[Circumstance C\], "I\'m in a
+scripting environment," "I\'m in a Cents environment," "I\'m in terrain
+with an unstable foundation," "I \...."
+
+\
+\
+
+::: {style="text-align: center"}
+**People get MIRED down into significances, into details, into the
+unimportant.**
+:::
+
+\
+\
+\
+
+And then they die without having paid attention to anything important.
+
+Many think they can\'t.
+
+YOU CAN.
+
+OKAY?
+
+YOU CAN.
+
+YOU CAN BASE YOUR LIFE AROUND IMPORTANT THINGS. YOU DON\'T HAVE TO ONLY
+FOCUS ON YOUR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING OR SOFTWARE ENGINEERING JOB.
+
+Or whatever it is.
+
+Snap out of it.
+
+You can face the big picture. And it\'s Okay if you\'re poor.
+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+::: {style="text-align: center"}
+### How to Deprogram Others From the Mainstream Engineering Establishment -- Or How to Deprogram Yourself
+:::
+
+**\
+\
+**
+
+Here is the technique or methodology.
+
+Also, Best-advice from cult-deprogrammers probably is quite valid here.
+
+Be gentle. If there\'s one thing to do -- be gentle. No coercion should
+be used on oneself or others. Be gentle.
+
+Be gradual. One can even be iterative -- doing certain portions slowly,
+and doing things again and again.
+
+It is very imperative that people understand that.
+
+\
+\
+\
+**Here is the list.**\
+\
+
+1.  Recognize that you Exist. (Personal epistemological, almost
+    Descartian thing here. Recognize that you ARE.)
+2.  Have individual agency irrespective of and separate from others
+3.  Recognize they have choice To Be or Not Be an Engineer at will, and
+    reject all qualities and accept all qualities of being an Engineer
+    at will.
+4.  Be completely willing to make a humongous mess or not make a
+    humongous mess at will in their creations (people have issues on
+    this point, actually neurotic obsessions on this point -- they are
+    only somewhat justified, usually it\'s just immaturity and acting
+    like a grade-schooler -- a lack of personal maturity)
+5.  Be completely willing to create in groups creations that would be
+    dynamic, but potentially very dangerous. For example -- the creation
+    of a laser beam that could be used for mass change (hypothetical
+    example).
+6.  Be completely willing to have personal financial ruin -- and to have
+    ones wife, husband, family and kids be impoverished along with one
+    -- This point might be hard for some people -- but it\'s a high
+    state. Independence of financial obsession leads to integrity.
+7.  Be willing to fight -- metaphorically and literally -- physically --
+    to fight for good, to fight against what is not right.
+8.  To increase your analytical abilities and creations above the status
+    quo, for all, collectively. The mainstream engineering establishment
+    doesn\'t understand GNU principles -- it doesn\'t understand
+    Judeo-Christian principles -- it doesn\'t understand "secular
+    humanist principles" -- it doesn\'t understand any moral principles.
+9.  Find what you truly believe -- philosophically. It doesn\'t matter
+    where you\'re from, think of the Beatles or Steve Jobs -- they went
+    to India and had a spiritual experience. Find your true self -- but
+    only on the basis of Reason and analytical abilities, if you base
+    this on just emotion, your life will be wasted.
+
+::: {.article_link}
+[Previous article](3.html) [Next article](5.html)
+:::

data/Articles_MD/5.html.md

@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+---
+title: 'Analysis of the Broken "Engineering Establishment Mindset"'
+---
+
+Analysis of the Broken "Engineering Establishment Mindset"
+==========================================================
+
+By G.C.
+-------
+
+The mainstream engineer is unequivocally in a very, very broken culture.
+
+This culture is leading to many significant problems in the world (see
+also: [**The Problem with the Mainstream Engineering
+Establishment**](1.html) on this blog/site.)
+
+But what is their mindset and why is it so dangerous and why must it be
+opposed to absolutely forcefully and vehemently?
+
+To start with, in no way is it democratic and in no way is it inspired
+by reason and French- and American-inspired Enlightenment Values.
+
+It is based on authoritarian conformity. And as such, it is based on
+upholding nonsense traditions -- I am not using such as an insult, but
+by "nonsense," I mean, a lack of high level reason in accordance with
+mathematics or trying to solve a high-level problem (see: [**The Problem
+with the Mainstream Engineering Establishment**](1.html)).
+
+It upholds nonsense, people build new skyscrapers while everyone at half
+the height of the skyscraper and lower is burning -- burning with
+thousands of problems, problems the mainstream engineering establishment
+is knowingly creating and supporting and is cognizant of.
+
+The people in charge in the mainstream engineering establishment know of
+and actively WANT these problems, because these problems lead to
+submission and conformity to them. Engineers are people who plan and
+create our world -- it is created flawed on purpose be the complacent
+and the deeply antidemocratic and corrupt.
+
+The only solution, because speaking is unlikely to work -- is to fight
+back, with literal force and violence, ideally in a macro-organized way,
+by means of communication channels such as the internet, in order to
+fight back at this. Occupy Wall Street is a disgrace, and perhaps, a
+conspiracy theorist might even think was staged. This movement didn\'t
+do much to fight back.
+
+Now, this is a big thing:
+-------------------------
+
+**When people assume conformity, when a man assumes his mistress must
+have sex with him, and she is socially pressured by him and feels
+near-powerless to disagree or express dissent -- when there is group
+agreement about "the way of the world" or the \"way something works\",
+one should know this:**
+
+**When violence is exerted, it acts as an effective substitute for that
+which one is socially told they cannot express.**
+
+This goes for liberals or conservatives.
+
+If the woman slapped her would-be rapist, if the slave attacks his
+slavemaster, if the common folk attacks the engineer or the engineering
+establishment with force or a show of force, it effectively opens the
+door to an increased range of discourse and a more democratic set of
+circumstances. This, then, opens the door to an equitable, fair,
+democratic process.
+
+This is why things like January 6 or liberal protests can be valuable
+and effective. Because liberals and conservatives try to shut each other
+up, and sometimes people\'s eyes need to be opened.
+
+It is a conformity-culture, and this is all they know, it really is and
+if you speak out they yell at you. It is important to ALWAYS step over
+them and get the last word -- like whack-a-mole.
+
+Indeed, these individuals are vermin and deserve to be gassed or killed
+unequivocally. Not from a partisan standpoint, but on the basis of
+mathematics and reason.
+
+Let\'s be quite candid here: There is just no point to
+working-your-way-up and becoming a billionaire in Biotech or some field
+or whatever, and acting like a gleaming ray of light, when the same
+vileness would continue. They are not listening to you. They don\'t want
+to listen to you. And you will be complicit in not fighting back, this
+will be YOUR sin, not necessarily theirs, and your complacency will be
+your biggest fault. Then, if or when a nuclear bomb gets dropped, your
+family might die, your business might crash and go into pieces, all
+because you were being \"Mr. Clean\" or "Ms. Clean" and trying to not
+get a criminal record or trying to not get legal charges. This will have
+been your fault. *Be willing to get messy.* Be willing to be defiant. Be
+willing to go into poverty, have your wife leave you, be hungry. I have
+certain been hungry on many occasions. A \"gleaming beacon of smiles\"
+isn\'t saving anyone, it\'s lying to people. **It\'s lying to people.**
+And these smiley types deserve, quite possibly, terrible treatment, the
+law in many cases is backwards. It rewards people who don\'t fight for
+good causes, and penalizes people who act in a heroic fashion. Whatever
+you think of them, think of Martin Luther King Jr. or Nelson Mandela.
+These people got punished by the law for trying to make the world a
+better place. I also got punished by the law for trying to make the
+world a better place. And so should you. The legal system is rigged and
+unfair. It rewards criminals and complacency. It punishes free speech
+and fighting back. It punishes doing the right thing.
+
+The victims of this culture act in the following ways
+
+They take on a "dorks" disposition, the culture degrades people, and
+makes people feel like, both individually, socially, societally, and
+epistemologically:
+
+-   failures
+-   retards
+-   3rd graders
+-   autistic people
+-   outcasts
+-   people who lack volition
+-   a member of a hivemind
+-   an anonymous agency-lacking entity
+-   a dark secret \[something\]
+-   a member of the modern day agenda, apolitical, submitting to what is
+    new unthinkingly
+-   second place
+-   a loser
+-   a pariah
+-   a nerd
+-   a geek
+-   one who must unthinkingly accept a submissive second place role
+-   a victim
+-   one who supports nonsense (e.g., video games, etc.)
+-   one who makes a large number of versions of a given thing, divorced
+    from a mathematical or logical sense of idealism or perfectionism
+-   non-perfectionists
+-   non-perfect people
+-   collectively ruined
+-   collectively suicidal
+-   non-ideological
+-   non-choosing
+-   mainstream-guidance-accepting
+-   tribal
+-   cliquish
+-   childish
+-   arrogant
+-   non-individual
+-   rude
+-   vile
+-   asshole-like
+-   nonconstructively combative
+-   irresponsible
+-   supportive of "over democratization" (i.e., immediate hive mind
+    rule)
+-   a listener
+-   a member of a culture that always listens (and if others don\'t
+    listen to a given data point or statement, they degrade them or
+    fight them)
+-   a member of a culture that values a working sample over any
+    semblance of pragmatism or idealism -- someone who degrades someone
+    or acts like an asshole \[or acts superior in some deluded way\] to
+    someone if they don\'t have a working sample
+-   a member of a culture that assumes that all other people act like
+    them, and if they don\'t, they try to fight them or degrade them
+    \[or act superior in some deluded way\]
+-   a member of a culture that assumes individual mind and character
+    degradation and "emplacement" \[putting the individual into their
+    place\] of all individuals, and tries to demand such if the
+    situation is different \[or closet-demands it, they get confused if
+    they can\'t socially demand it, fortunately the current society\'s
+    average is better than this\]
+-   doesn\'t understand, sympathize with, empathize with, or love,
+    concepts like dynamism, vitality, fighting against the odds
+    successfully, success itself, or any concept that could be conflated
+    with good circumstances or liberation from this culture
+-   And others qualities.
+
+::: {.article_link}
+[Previous article](4.html) [Next article](6.html)
+:::

data/Articles_MD/6.html.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+---
+title: The Myth of the Perfect Child
+---
+
+The Myth of the Perfect Child
+=============================
+
+By G.C.
+-------
+
+Parents think that they want to have a perfect child who will be raised
+"perfectly" and follow all the norms and be squeaky clean and follow all
+the rules and become a doctor, lawyer, or engineer.
+
+This is highly deluded.
+
+Indeed, it might be worth it, potentially, to just not have the child in
+the first place.
+
+This world is horribly corrupt. Raising a kid in this broken world is
+very dangerous. Moreover, you\'re raising a sociopath or
+quasi-sociopath. Anyone who follows the status quo of the school system
+is likely half-broken if not fully broken.
+
+It is NOT a good thing to raise a child who is not a fighter. It is NOT
+a good thing to raise a child who "agrees" constantly, and conforms to
+what his teachers say constantly. It is NOT a good thing to raise a
+child who doesn\'t care about high mathematics and reason and high
+philosophy.
+
+One should raise an idealist, but that would certainly make supporting
+themselves and raising a family more difficult if they are genuinely
+candid.
+
+It is certainly a shame -- the degree of mania in the society right now.
+
+It makes the world almost unlivable if one wants to retain ones
+integrity.
+
+It is possible but it will be a struggle.
+
+I think Stallman is a great example for many people of someone who
+retains their integrity through anything. I have as well.
+
+::: {.article_link}
+[Previous article](5.html) [Next article](7.html)
+:::

data/Articles_MD/7.html.md

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+---
+title: Narcissism and Arrogance
+---
+
+Narcissism and Arrogance
+========================
+
+By G.C.
+-------
+
+The world is filled with a great deal of narcissism and arrogance. A lot
+of the time people *HORRIBLY* misuse the word "narcissism," as if it had
+any weight for anyone and was something other than a symbol of
+degradation, domination and human labelling.
+
+Such is certainly present in the mainstream engineering establishment,
+even though they don\'t admit it.
+
+It is filled with a bunch of people who act like their the only ones in
+the world, and who are asocial.
+
+::: {.article_link}
+[Previous article](6.html) [Next article](8.html)
+:::