RubyGems - foundational_lib - Versions diffs - 1.0 - Mend

foundational_lib 1.0

Files changed (529) hide show

checksums.yaml ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+---
+SHA256:
+  metadata.gz: 2bec8fc664e1e8e7d004c0e72dc74fabe0f5b68c8939f6d518aed5eebc401bd0
+  data.tar.gz: 8f58449ea2534b4ba66671974728929b45974a9a635f9da46877c43b897886dd
+SHA512:
+  metadata.gz: a20f1197ff75d3b16aa52e7a21e68a6631b48541cfc1ba8a1c5ead8d99f7e95743ab33da286f4b74bc49d98403edb26dd97f101f3a28714ebe4bf3b6d20eb57f
+  data.tar.gz: 58d07c8c0e7efcae1c309e86858c6d285bdae92b986d253c0d634f5837ea7ca5ab79855eede6b71b4bbaf45b31f2bf87778ab22604ca046d702e71b932407ba6

data/Articles/1.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,524 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta charset="UTF-8">
+<title>The Problem with the Mainstream Engineering Establishment</title>
+<link rel='stylesheet' href='css.css'>
+</head>
+<body>
+<h1>The Problem with the Mainstream Engineering Establishment</h1>
+<h2>By G.C.</h2>
+<p>There is a major problem in the modern world &ndash; the mainstream
+engineering establishment.</p>
+<p>This is a very major problem. In the following sixteen articles, I
+shall enumerate some of the major issues with it, and I shall provide
+effective principles and remedies by which to dynamically address
+the current status quo. Additionally, I will present foundationallib,
+which is built with very good computer software code, and it is an
+effective tool, but not in line with current values of the current
+mainstream establishment.</p>
+<p>The largest problem with the mainstream engineering establishment is a profound and thorough lack of
+free speech and free discourse in the system. This is widely pervasive and is international.</p>
+<p>Without beating around the bush:</p>
+<p>The problem of lack of discourse in the engineering
+establishment and in its perverse affected subjects (all of
+mainstream academia) must be met by violence in order for them to
+listen &ndash; inasmuch as they are unequivocally extremely set in their ways, and
+they uniformly do not listen to other views&mdash;maybe with a gleam or
+a fake uniformly disingenuous smile, but never sincerely. The
+solution to this and the only solution to the resolution of this &ndash; is outright violence and murder. They need to be murdered. Along
+with speech. That will get them to listen to speech.</p>
+<p>Because left to their own devices, they will not. And then the current mess that we are all in,
+as enumerated in the following sixteen articles, would continue.</p>
+<p>People should adhere to what people smarter than them in a given
+domain know in terms of understandings and reasoning abilities, if
+such have been hitherto made. This means primarily mathematicians
+making a logical statement. It doesn't mean adhering to
+climatologists who don't have compelling arguments in terms of why
+one should act a certain way or not &ndash; this is political, and their
+arguments are ambiguous and not strong, and not basic to people's
+modus operandi and how they operate and think.</p>
+<p>All action must be based on heuristics of the proper solution to
+the Right Problem at hand. Knowing the Right Problem is more
+important that any solutions.</p>
+<p>The Right Problem is probably not what the individual is being
+told &ndash; family, race, gender, economic circumstances, lack of
+education or experience or being in the right place at the right
+time &ndash; these are all not the Right Problem.</p>
+<p>The Right Problem is categorical and isn't based on the
+individual.</p>
+<p>It depends on philosophical circumstances.</p>
+<p>We are talking about human action, human techne, in order to
+resolve problems.</p>
+<p>A sub-problem is likely to be a lack of power in operation, in
+techne.</p>
+<p>Therefore, people strive after connection, money, influence,
+high status, in order to resolve a given problem, or problems
+collectively.</p>
+<p>The Right Problem likely relates to survival and knowing as much
+as possible.</p>
+<p>But in order to not alienate the reader, I need not wax
+philosophical about the topmost “right problem.”</p>
+<p>In human techne, in operation, there are also "Right Sub
+Problems".</p>
+<p>A “Right Sub Problem” might be</p>
+<table style=''>
+<tr>
+<th>Postulates, Goals and Problems</th>
+<th>Logical sequence</th>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 1 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>We exist and we think</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 2 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Our existence and thought is observed to be imperilled &ndash; by
+us</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='goal'>Sub Goal 1 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Survival and persistence and existing &ndash; to the highest
+level</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='problem'>Sub Problem 1 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Now we have the problem of how to bring this about</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 2 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>We can operate, but our operation is limited (by whatever
+factors)</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 3 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>We have made machines.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='goal'>Sub Goal 2 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>We should increase our level of potential operation to its
+highest level, resulting in the highest level of general
+Ability.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='problem'>Sub Problem 2 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Now, we need to figure out how to execute this.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 4 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Machines can increase our level of operation, our level of
+techne.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 5 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Machines have limits themselves</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 6 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>We should maximize machines to increase our level of operation,
+within ethical limits perhaps, aligning with our main real goals
+and subgoals (which are not necessarily all stated here)</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='p'>Postulate 7 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Machines are limited by as fast as they can move.</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='goal'>Sub Goal 3 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Therefore, we need to figure out how to maximize machines to
+their highest potential</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+<td class='problem'>Sub Problem 3 &nbsp;&nbsp;—</td>
+<td>Our problem, then, is to remove from existence all things that
+get in the way of having machines operate well, which, in turn,
+aligns with our goals of being able to operate, which in turn
+aligns with our goal of surviving well.</td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+<p>Now, this Sub Problem 3 of Existence is interesting.</p>
+<p>Human operation as of 2023/2024 DOES NOT align with this at all,
+no one can argue it does. The machines we use are slow and clunky,
+needlessly. This is on the hardware side. On the software side -
+the situation is even worse. The world is not logical. It is not
+and it should be. Alternatives are: logical world, good world,
+illogical world; a semblance of Hell itself.</p>
+<p>Logic is good. Logic is easiness is goodness is rightness is
+properness.</p>
+<p>Illogic is all of the bad and hellish qualities of man.</p>
+<p>Illogic is when actions are executed that don't align with a
+proper goal.</p>
+<p>Making messes without satisfaction of anyone and without any
+purpose of the mess, is illogic. It is not good and must be
+purged.</p>
+<p>We world is full of illogic. Most things are wrong.</p>
+<p>We are on the brink of killing all of ourselves.</p>
+<p>We don't postulate high goals often.</p>
+<p>We don't align our actions with high goals often.</p>
+<p>We aren't COGNIZANT of high goals often &ndash; we don't even know of
+them.</p>
+<p>The engineering establishment is VERY set in its ways. If you
+try to denuclearize a country by telling them "be more logical man,
+act better", would they humbly introspect and consult the most
+educated mathematicians in an area, humbly delegating the high
+logic to them (not the physicists or politicians or partisans, to
+be quite unequivocal and clear, the mathematicians and perhaps
+logicians). Or would they turn to their cliquish nature, reddit,
+their social media friends, their hivemind, their hive-mind
+peers?</p>
+<p>They don't act logically. For the last 200 years there has been
+one debacle after another. This is not written as a high brow
+letter but as an encouragement of proactive change &ndash; NOW. Violence
+is the only solution here &ndash; and I hope people get mad at this. I am
+not a troll, don't care about angering others, but angering others
+is the only solution. Whether it be someone like Trump or someone
+on the other side, we need radicals &ndash; both in low levels and in
+leader levels, to change things. Even Trump, early on, wasn't
+radical or violent, in many ways he was the opposite. I want to be
+quite clear and unequivocal here.</p>
+<p>Violence IS the solution.</p>
+<p>The engineering establishment is too stuck in its ways &ndash; in
+religion, in culture, in non-criminality (a giant limiting trap),
+in social status, in wages, in future plans, in past engineering
+“accomplishments” (which is just arrogance and only contributes to
+the destruction that we're still in), and in current vices.</p>
+<p>Barring a bunch of people violating norms and laws, unabashedly,
+and fighting to the highest of their ability, is it almost
+impossible that there would be an actual solution.</p>
+<p>We have become a culture of losers &ndash; and to blame is the
+mainstream engineering establishment since the industrial
+revolution for not fighting back and revolting against
+themselves.</p>
+<p>We need MORE criminality, MORE arrests, MORE violence, MORE
+speaking out.</p>
+<p>There is, unequivocally and without a doubt, too many people who
+expect high salaries for the educated without moral checks, moral
+checks for what is important.</p>
+<p>Let's enumerate here how EVERYTHING in the current scene is
+failing.</p>
+<p><strong>Income Equality</strong> &ndash; Lack of it.</p>
+<p>In recent decades, under the influence of the so-called educated
+and mainstream engineering cult, which goes hand in hand with
+business and is the bread an butter of business, income inequality
+has gone to all hell since they killed the USSR. The finger of
+submission is stronger than ever in many ways, children are paying
+more and more for college degrees they can't use as a symbol of
+submission and degradation to the mainstream engineering
+establishment, and living is becoming harder and harder the more
+they control. Their products get massed produced on a larger scale,
+and there is more and more poverty in the populace, quite
+ironically. Since the death of the idealism of the communism
+project (which had never been shown to work but at least pretended
+to believe in something, they have projected their arrogant, ugly
+claws more and more on the average people). And, they are wholly
+undemocratic in their viewpoints, they don't tolerate choice,
+talking or conversation itself.</p>
+<p><strong>Climate</strong> &ndash; We are coming up with a million
+dangerous climate circumstances. There is garbage articulation of
+the dangers here because the engineers and people in charge of this
+act too insular and sanctimonious &ndash; actually, they want the climate
+to fail, it is in their vested interests and the vested interests
+of many people for it to fail. The general public doesn't listen
+because there is no one effectively communicating about this &ndash; and
+business doesn't want it and people and the engineering
+establishment are disingenuous about this.</p>
+<p><strong>Mental health</strong> &ndash; In their quest to control and
+subdue people, they have ruined mental health for people in the
+modern world. Statistics show that mental health is worse for the
+young than many times before. They produce damaging drugs, push
+them on kids and people, and create, overtly create, the conditions
+that ruin people, low income, a messed up culture, perverse
+capitalism, social dominance and subjugation, etc.</p>
+<p><strong>Nuclear weapons</strong> &ndash; Since the 1940s, the
+engineering establishment has put humanity in peril and under their
+thumb &ndash; they made humanity their bitch.</p>
+<p>The fake fear of the cold war and nuclear armageddon put
+humanity under the whim of high level engineers and so called
+scientists who seek to undemocratically dominate the world.</p>
+<p><strong>AI</strong> &ndash; In recent times, there is another new
+threat, a product of engineers, actually useful (as opposed to
+nuclear bombs), but much more dangerous and strange. That is AI,
+and it is both a blessing and a curse.</p>
+<p>But, if the engineers, who operate on the basis of the worst
+qualities that people have, continues unabated and unfought, then
+it is quite plausible that a Terminator-like situation would come
+about, quite knowingly and gleefully in the eyes of some cold
+creatures in an ivory tower and glasses.</p>
+<p>They have everything under their grasp, and it is quite possible
+that a clique of elites would tolerate this because it would enrich
+themselves and their rich and powerful friends.</p>
+<p>At the expense of humanity.</p>
+<p>Or perhaps it would be political, and the robots would be
+targeted at a specific county, race, or group of people.</p>
+<p>It would be interesting to see a Christian or a LGBT Holocaust.
+But does anyone want this??</p>
+<p>These people unequivocally hate democracy, unless they are in
+charge, then they pretend its presence in most cases.</p>
+<p>Democracy &ndash; which many consider a face, only can exist in the
+context of humility, of self-reflection, of down-to-earthness.</p>
+<p>These people are NOT down to earth. They degrade people all the
+time.</p>
+<p>They act on the level of 3-year-olds, smirking to themselves,
+only permitting or acknowledging as “existing” or “relevant” their
+thoughts.</p>
+<p>They are completely unqualified, have zero credentials ever,
+have zero credentials I wish to repeat, and are unequivocally
+nobodies. It's time people beat them into submission, literally and
+figuratively.</p>
+<p>They should adhere to high logic and to the highest
+mathematicians' premises. NOT vested interests. NOT the military
+industrial complex (which is their fault). Not to Big Pharma (which
+is their fault). Not to any other interests.</p>
+<p>The “spell” that people fall under, more so than wokeism,
+MAGA-ism or other supposed ills, is the dictate of the engineering
+establishment &ndash; they are wholly undemocratic.</p>
+<p>They don't tolerate speech other than that which they deem okay.
+This establishment is actually a combination of a number of
+different establishments, many of which people hate, some examples
+of which would be, the military industrial complex and Big
+Pharma.</p>
+<p>The fake news mainstream media, which is really fake, whether
+your a liberal or conservative, Marxist or libertarian, is dictated
+by the cultural whims of these creeps, the engineering
+establishment. They despise free discourse, and put in place
+draconian laws to curtail speech and stifle liberties. For
+instance, hate speech laws. So called “hate speech” might be the
+only way to overcome these people, to get them to at least somewhat
+listen. It doesn't matter if one is a far-left Democrat or a
+far-right Republican, this is all the same.</p>
+<p>If you want to say something out of line? That wouldn't be
+tolerated, and you would get fired or not get a degree or not get
+into a university at all. You might lose your non-university job.
+You might be in poverty. And this is okay.</p>
+<p>Is it expressly, EXPLICITLY OKAY to be in poverty to fight
+this.</p>
+<p>The mainstream engineering establishment perpetuates the lie
+that money matters, that money is all that matters, that conformity
+happens and is the way of things (they act like it's immutable),
+that one should get a higher paying job and submit wholly to norms,
+that their backwards, limited form of capitalism is all that
+matters, that love, empathy, the decency of the individual, don't
+matter.</p>
+<p>They don't listen. The proper solution to someone smirking and
+acting in an ivory tower is literal human violence.</p>
+<p>And this is the solution.</p>
+<p>Ones other alternative is the continuation of the last 300
+years.</p>
+<p>Could you imagine the American revolution happening without
+violence? Or any revolution you may favor?</p>
+<p>One of their recent fake creations was the idea of "human
+rights".</p>
+<p>This can about in the aftermath of WW2, which was their war,
+with the support of the UN, which is their group.</p>
+<p>The idea is that &ndash; people should be woke enough to not stand up
+for injustices, that people should be passive and tolerate THEIR
+fake “development” of the world and world affairs.</p>
+<p>Is the world safer since WW2? In any way? Or better?</p>
+<p>Are you richer?</p>
+<p>Their typical modus operandi is "shut up and listen &ndash; we control
+things". They abound in Greek and Latin terms, which, while many
+people have grown an affection for, are arbitrary artifacts of
+ancient and barbaric times.</p>
+<p>Their basis is PRE-ENLIGHTENMENT &ndash; PRE-ENLIGHTENMENT GREECE,
+PRE-ENLIGHTENMENT ROME.</p>
+<p>They don't have modern ideas or principles in their DNA. The old
+must be purged.</p>
+<p>Because these people hate democracy so much, they are actively
+selling out to China, which doesn't even have a fake pretense of
+“human rights,” it just demands submission, something they surely
+relate to very well.</p>
+<p>They have spent decades now giving jobs to the Chinese and
+turbo-charging their growth.</p>
+<p>The major different between the West and China is, in the West,
+we can speak out, at least in theory against this establishment. In
+China, you will get executed. If we sell out to China, opposing
+this becomes much harder.</p>
+<p>Which is why it is time to opposite this NOW and fight this
+NOW.</p>
+<p>We need a democratic engineering establishment and academic
+establishment that operates in adherence to high logic from
+mathematicians in regards to operation; tolerates dissenting views;
+supports proper moral values; supports democracy; acknowledges the
+revolutionary potential of people and supports it [to fight for
+good]; tolerates free speech and open debate on subjects like
+psychiatry and Scientology (and god you know they can't do it right
+now, have that conversation, they'll physically run away from you
+in person, then start yelling into the air without context or
+reason, completely immature) and the macroeconomic implications of
+that &ndash; how this would affect mental health, mass sales, etc.; is
+relatively more laid back than the current engineering
+establishment and open to alternate viewpoints and approaches in
+regards to the creation of things &ndash; bridges, electronics, drugs,
+anything.</p>
+<p>Every action besides raw violence is probably untenable with
+these people. Try a more peaceful approach first or alongside the
+violent approach. Don't be afraid to get arrested or in legal
+trouble. I reiterate that.</p>
+<p>I got in legal trouble in 2022 for the first time, I mingled
+with some bad people, that perhaps I shouldn't have. Do I regret
+it? No. Because all too often, people think that certain things are
+“scams” or “non scams” &ndash; blindly blocking out nuance or thought
+about certain things. This is one of the biggest mental blocks
+people have. They auto-brand things: “scam” or “non-scam.” I
+“can't” do _________ because..... But they CAN do _________. They
+CAN do that thing.</p>
+<p>But they think they can't.</p>
+<p>And you CAN take the plunge into new things, into defiance, into
+individuality, into supporting worthwhile causes, into rejecting
+friends and associates, into become the true you, into candid
+sincerity, into finding your true self, into knowledge, into
+research, into truth, into revolt.</p>
+<p>If cutting ties with these types makes a better you, then you
+can do that.</p>
+<p>No one should tell you that you “can't” do something, even
+getting arrested.</p>
+<p>As an important last note: and this is important. When people assume
+conformity, when a man assumes his mistress must have sex with him,
+and she is socially pressured, when there is group agreement about
+“the way of the world” or the “way something works,” one should
+know this:</p>
+<br>
+<p><strong>When violence is exerted, it acts as an effective
+substitute for that which one is socially told they cannot
+express.</strong></p>
+<br>
+<p>This goes for liberals or conservatives.</p>
+<p>It should be no surpise that the violent get nearly deified
+when their tactics work &ndash; look at communist revolutionaries or
+North Korea or George Washington. When people fight (to be able to
+live and do the most foundational thing besides eating and sleeping -
+speaking and expressing thoughts) and create a land that is somehow “free” -
+those people get practically deified.</p>
+<p>If the woman slapped her would-be rapist, if the slave attacks
+his slavemaster, if the common folk attacks the engineer or the
+engineering establishment with force or a show of force, it
+effectively opens the door to an increased range of discourse and a
+more democratic set of circumstances. This, then, opens the door to
+an equitable, fair, democratic process.</p>
+<p>This is why things like January 6 or liberal protests can be
+valuable and effective. Because liberals and conservatives try to
+shut each other up, and sometimes people's eyes need to be
+opened.</p>
+<hr>
+<p>It is imperative that people in their 30s, 40s and 50s, and later years,
+the “seasoned engineer” or the “professional” with “20 years experience”
+or someone who has “settled” to engage in a self-determined, open-minded
+and rationally-skeptical deprogramming in their lives &ndash; and be willing to be in a
+mental context that would be more conducive to disagreeing with the mainstream
+engineering establishment and bring about a true and honest range of discourse
+about all matters &ndash; not just a cherry-picked selection of topics “of interest”
+to be told to be curious about (most of which are nonsensical, just look at
+the front page of Hacker News, for example).</p>
+<p>As with any deprogramming of any Cult &ndash; non forcible means are ideal.</p>
+<p>Only this cult is the most thoroughgoing and widespread cult that has ever existed.
+And fighting against it might make you go almost sick.</p>
+<hr>
+<p>As for non-Western centric perspectives, this applies just as much in a Chinese and Indian context &ndash; more so in some cases.</p>
+<p>However, what is quite interesting about these examples
+is that, since Indians and Chinese live in developing countries, the powers-that-be would be less reflexive of squashing dissent &ndash; nothing
+is “wholly settled” with a fake “consensus,” and so there might be more of an open mind to challenging the established authority (the West)
+by trying different approaches. There is more potential of a macro-revolt in China, presumably,
+in this particular regard, unless the West demonstrates a macro-grassroots movement, which has not happened yet, but is possible. There are
+certainly a lot more rich people in the West than in the East, and the West has much more to lose. Moreover, when one is sanctimonious, one
+then divorces oneself from reality. One becomes obsessed with maintaining an image. The Chinese and Asian countries are used to the dirt,
+only the West has had its head held up high.</p><div class='article_link'><a href="index.html">Previous article</a>
+<a href="2.html">Next article</a></div>
+</body>
+</html>

data/Articles/10.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta charset="UTF-8">
+<title>The Fight</title>
+<link rel='stylesheet' href='css.css'>
+</head>
+<body>
+<h1>The Fight</h1>
+<h2>By G.C.</h2>
+<p>With Foundationallib, I am striving for perfection, but also
+Ubiquity.</p>
+<p>The previous articles, along with this, should unequivocally
+explain why this software library should indeed be UBIQUITOUS.</p>
+<p>Firstly, it is unimportant that I made it completely. It doesn't
+matter WHO made it. It is in the public domain for anyone to use
+and modify.</p>
+<p>It is not about status or prestige or thinking I'm great or any
+such thing. It is about REASON and LOGIC (see article 1 and 6).</p>
+<p>I intend to make this library perfect and applicable for all use
+cases, all while not introducing any bloat &ndash; meaning it should be
+perfect on embedded and high end desktops and servers -
+everywhere.</p>
+<p>The fight is not about THIS library or MY library, it's for what
+the previous article talked about &ndash; those ideals.</p>
+<p>IDEAL SPEED &ndash; INCLUDING NO EXCESSIVE OPERATIONS</p>
+<p>IDEAL OPERATION &ndash; ALL ERRORS CHECKED UNLESS YOU DON'T WANT
+SUCH</p>
+<p>PROPER CUSTOMIZATION</p>
+<p>MINIMAL MEMORY USAGE &ndash; WHEN IT MATTERS</p>
+<p>Moreover, on a more human basis, I want to:</p>
+<p>Enable people to use computers properly.</p>
+<p>Enable people to operate ably &ndash; to the maximum degree of
+ability. This, sometimes, when people use computers, would involve
+having there be code for a custom operation not handled by a
+certain set of programs.</p>
+<p>Conquer fundamental goals that people have and help others
+to.</p>
+<p>I welcome all quality communications, contributions and feedback
+from people &ndash; in tests, new code, donations, validation, security,
+good ideas, good advice, etc.</p>
+<p>My email is gregorycohennew@gmail.com and my PayPal is <a href=
+'https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/cfoundationallib'>https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/cfoundationallib</a>.
+At least it is until they maybe take it down, heh.</p><div class='article_link'><a href="9.html">Previous article</a>
+<a href="11.html">Next article</a></div>
+</body>
+</html>