RubyGems - foundational_lib - Versions diffs - 1.0 - Mend

foundational_lib 1.0

Files changed (529) hide show

data/Articles/16.html ADDED Viewed

@@ -0,0 +1,908 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head>
+<meta charset="utf-8">
+<title>Epistemology</title>
+</head>
+<body>
+<link rel='stylesheet' href='css.css'>
+<h2>There's no fucking way in hell that the mainstream engineering
+establishment would converse about this epistemology &ndash; I have tried
+for 5 years.</h2>
+<h2>Eventually, this will get talked about.</h2>
+<div style='text-align: center'>
+<h1>In the beginning, there is</h1>
+</div>
+<p>* Existence (no self-ontology)</p>
+<p>* Concreteness (no self-ontology)</p>
+<p>* Anti-existence (anti-ontology [for others and self too, not
+relevant, no self-ontology])</p>
+<p>* Anti-concreteness (anti-ontology [for others and self too, not
+relevant, no self-ontology])</p>
+<p>All of these attributes have no ontology. They don’t exist.</p>
+<p>They are attributes, but they are not attributes of anything
+that exists.</p>
+<p>It is possible that other attributes are also present in the
+beginning, but they are not relevant and it wouldn’t matter if they
+were present or not.</p>
+<p>Anti-existence and anti-concreteness both work, but are super
+vague.</p>
+<p>They both fail at their goals, leading to both existence and
+concreteness.</p>
+<p>Therefore something that has ontological existence comes into
+existence for the first time, with extremely low (possibly
+infinitesimal concreteness).</p>
+<p>In trying to make things not exist in the most abstract and
+poorly defined way, and in trying to get things not to be concrete
+in the most abstract and poorly defined way, they make something
+exist.</p>
+<p>This is Numbers or “numberness” or “numbernessness,” etc. in
+probably the most abstract or one of the most abstract ways
+possible.</p>
+<p>Numberness combined with the super-abstract anti-existence and
+anti-concreteness again fail to interact and produce
+positionness.</p>
+<p>Positionness again fails to interact with those things and
+produces positions, multiple positions that have ontological
+significance. Probably a very large number of positions would be
+produced.</p>
+<p>Positionness interacting with those things produces
+groupness.</p>
+<p>Groupness interacts with those two things, which Try to remove
+the groupness from existence.</p>
+<p>Those things fail, and produce the content of groups, in
+probably a very abstract way.</p>
+<p>In the production of the content of groups, the following things
+happen.</p>
+<p>Elimination necessitation</p>
+<p>Firstly, to appease “The Eliminator” (a synonym for
+Simplification, Reductionism, Mathematics,</p>
+<p>Destructionism or Elimination, all of which are synonymous), the
+relationship between the two or more “things” needs to be defined
+clearly and explicitly. To do this, one requisite is that there
+needs to be a set, singular ordering of the two or more “things,”
+no going back, no changing. The “things” go in a specific
+order.</p>
+<p>Therefore | The ordering gets established, perhaps arbitrarily,
+in line with the way that “The Eliminator” does it.</p>
+<p>Elimination necessitation | But the ordering can't be justified
+to the Eliminator as making sense, without an observer. The
+observer would have the effect of validating and justifying the
+rather arbitrary ordering. To the observer, the ordering is the
+proper ordering, and no other ordering would be proper.</p>
+<p>Therefore | An observer comes about, first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness, of the validity of the ordering comes about, in order
+to justify the ordering to The Eliminator (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing) first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens
+(think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming)</p>
+<p>Awareness comes about as an attribute of the observer, in order
+to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>(Commentary: Spinoza, a man accused of as being an atheist,
+believed that everything was “mind.” This is called idealism in
+philosophy, an idea that is not necessarily a religious one, and
+not necessarily a superstitious one. This is where “mind” would
+first come about. Later in the process, “mental health” comes about
+as well. This would be necessary for “mind.”)</p>
+<p>Awareness of awareness comes about as an attribute of the
+observer, in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Commentary: The observer is also aware that they are aware.</p>
+<p>An incessant extension of the ordering comes about, as a
+“background process,” if you will, to make the ordering not be
+finite, and therefore make sense.</p>
+<p>Each next item is one greater than the previous item.</p>
+<p>First this happens partially, then completely after the
+following process happens (think of it like a recursive function
+call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>There is an alteration of the awareness of the observer; the
+amount of awareness has new ontological attributes of itself come
+about as attributes of the observer, in order to justify the
+ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens
+(think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).</p>
+<p>Commentary:</p>
+<p>Therefore | it could appear as if there were such things as
+“moments,” to the observer.</p>
+<p>Therefore | it could appear as if there were “time,” to the
+observer.</p>
+<p>Commentary: For the observer to validate the ordering, the
+observer would need to be able to “agree”</p>
+<p>with sequential things, and “disagree” with nonsequential
+things. For the observer to agree with a state with its awareness,
+it needs to experience sensation.</p>
+<p>9) Thus sensation comes about.</p>
+<p>Sensation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>“Mental health” comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of unitness of observer (Unitness means the condition
+of being “one thing”).</p>
+<p>(Commentary: being aware that other observers exist, does not
+make them exist, does not make numbers exist, does not make them
+concrete and does not make numbers concrete. [Nor does it make
+numerals concrete. None of these things exist yet. The other
+observers may or may not be aware yet. The other observers may or
+may not be aware that they are aware yet.)</p>
+<p>Awareness of other observers (non-concrete, non-ontological)
+comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god
+of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of separateness of other observers (non-ontological)
+comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god
+of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>——————————————————————————————</p>
+<p>After awareness of the validity of the ordering fully comes
+about, and all of the aforementioned steps happen as well, the
+following things happen</p>
+<p>Awareness of existence (the high-level attribute, no ontology)
+comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god
+of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of concreteness (high level attribute, no ontology)
+comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could
+call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god
+of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of ontological existence of ordering comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of concreteness of ordering comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness that concreteness of ordering is nonzero (greater than
+zero) (Concreteness != 0 or Concreteness &gt; 0, Concreteness could
+not be negative) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Once those previous 5 steps fully happen, the following starts
+to happen</p>
+<p>(Awareness then begins to come into existence in other ways that
+doesn’t only have to do with the ordering.</p>
+<p>This is very, very interesting.)</p>
+<p>Awareness of ontological existence of ordering comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>(Commentary: Now that there is 1) awareness, 2) self-awareness,
+3) awareness of others, their unitness and separateness and 4)
+awareness of the ordering, awareness of others starts to be defined
+more accurately, since awareness is early in this simplificational
+definition sequence, as listed above. This begins with the
+following)</p>
+<p>Awareness of Awareness of Awareness — the awareness of (another
+observer’s) awareness of awareness— comes about, in order to
+justify an observer’s Awareness of Awareness as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness — the awareness
+of (another observer’s) awareness of (an ordering’s own, to self)
+awareness of awareness — comes about, in order to justify an
+observer’s Awareness of Awareness (and therefore, mental health and
+sensation, since awareness depends on mental health and sensation,
+which in effect are synonymous) as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness of Awareness (5
+“awareness”es)– awareness of (ones own; to self) awareness of the
+awareness of (another’s) awareness of (one’s own; to self)
+awareness of awareness — comes about, in order to justify an
+observer’s own Awareness of Awareness (and therefore, mental health
+and sensation, since awareness depends on mental health and
+sensation, which in effect are synonymous) as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Commentary: 5 awarenesses are all that are necessary. Awareness
+of self-awareness is basically the same thing as self-awareness.
+This process doesn’t need to go on forever.</p>
+<p>Emotion, in order to experience the sensation of agreement comes
+about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call
+it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
+some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>An attempt to gain awareness of ontological existence of other
+observers comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>(Commentary, a little bit of a tangent, but bear with me: The
+attempt fails, which results in the following. It is not necessary
+that the “failure” be ontological. But the attempt doesn’t work.
+Also, the ontological existence of the other observers may not may
+not be concrete yet, depending on the other observer. This the
+first and only true Communication between observers [beings] and is
+the only reason things, such as Barack Obama or a chair or a
+universe seem to exist.</p>
+<p>Spinoza said that everything is “mind.” This “mind” would come
+about when “awareness” comes about. Spinoza believed that higher
+factors don’t influence lower-level factors. I don’t necessarily
+agree with this view, and Spinoza’s claim is unproven. On the basis
+of reason and logic and mathematics alone, this book might prove
+the opposite.</p>
+<p>Spinoza was considered an Atheist in his day (even though this
+is kind of not true).</p>
+<p>Sense channel awareness come about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Sensation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Emotional Levels come about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>An Emotional Spectrum comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of the attempt to improve mental health of observer
+(being), due to the fact that the space and the content in the
+universe, as well as the Simplification- or Mathematically- or
+Reductionistically- caused reaction to understand the ontology of
+other observers (which doesn't ever happen fully) with one or more
+other observers, have a negative effect on the observer’s mental
+health and sensation, and therefore the observer becomes inclined
+to improve their own mental health, and improve their own
+sensation. (these two things are basically the same thing.) comes
+about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call
+it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
+some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Universe (Space and Content) comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Awareness of How to Produce Space and Content comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Space And Content comes about as an attribute of the observer
+(or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as
+life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order
+to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Action comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Observer-Caused Action comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Causation comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>A consequence comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Causation consequence loops come about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>The foundational aspects of a universe that would appear to be
+time comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
+a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
+ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens
+(think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).</p>
+<p>Events come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Games come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one
+could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be
+a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the
+ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or
+Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first
+partially, then completely after the following process happens
+(think of it like a recursive function call in computer
+programming).</p>
+<p>Freedom comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Barriers come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Purposes come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Numbers (Between Numberness and Concrete Numbers in
+concreteness) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Concrete Details come about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Concrete Numbers come about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Concrete Sequence (Numbers need to have a sequence) comes about
+as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it,
+whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some
+sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
+to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Time (a real ontological thing, not just an idea, this exists on
+the basis of a sequence or sequences) comes about as an attribute
+of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this
+being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Time Streams (a real, ontological stream of time exists, but
+maybe not inside of the physical universe) comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Reset Time (Since events, games, ontological time, and
+ontological time streams have partly come into existence and are in
+the process of coming into existence, higher-level factors could
+reset concrete sequences back to previous states. This is called
+“Reset Time” because Time could be thought to reset. It would be an
+arbitrary statement to say that time cannot go back. Since games
+partly exist, the “dial” of the procession of time, the “variable”
+in a C struct, is simply given a lower value, if higher level
+factors dictate it. It would suck to have time be resetting all the
+time. All personal, “permanent” progress would be lost. For one to
+avoid this, one would need to try to control the higher level
+factor which would be leading to this. Simply by one exerting
+individual influence and by being POTENTIALLY influential or
+dangerous to existence and these various factors, one could exert
+control. Relation comes into existence before this factor (see
+above). Therefore, things are related, in as many ways as possible,
+and one can exert influence. If JoJo Siwa were a potential threat
+to the human race and wished Death Threats to Xi Jinping and Donald
+Trump, and was willing to turn her young fanbase into a cult with
+greater zeal and fervor than QAnon, those factors related to JoJo
+Siwa and those factors trying to paint JoJo Siwa as an innocent,
+innocuous, harmless, young girl, would start to compete with each
+other like crazy and would start to do what they could to control
+JoJo Siwa more, even though they couldn't. Their “alternatives”
+could be shooting her, but that would produce an even bigger
+problem. Those factors would get stimulated like hell and would
+begin to act differently. They would act in an “appropriate,” "not
+corrupt", “sensible,” “liberal,” and “politically correct” way. So,
+if she becomes more dangerous to an environment which is already
+dangerous, she could produce tremendous influence and increase
+discourse. Intelligence agencies could spend a lot of time trying
+to sway her action in a direction that “they like.” Any controlling
+factors would start altering significantly their course of action,
+including negative courses of action. Controlling factors might be
+parents, friends, bosses, police, AI, perhaps aliens, perhaps
+other-dimensional players. Many, many factors, right now,
+regardless of whether or not there are aliens or whether or not
+Jesus or Lucifer exist, do certainly care about YOUR future and the
+outcome of YOUR life. Police care, governments care. Assuming that
+a dystopian condition of “Reset Time” does exist, there are ways of
+overcoming it. It would depend upon being very dangerous and being
+very willing to communicate and to being very willing to
+communicate philosophical statements to people. Look at how
+dangerous Karl Marx was. Imagine if JoJo Siwa or Olivia Rodrigo or
+Sabrina Carpenter were that dangerous. Imagine of Chinese pop stars
+stated "Practice Falun Dafa everyone!!! Democracy for all!!! Death
+to the Chinese Communist Party!" An effective way by which one
+could exert influence, would be to befriend celebrities. That is
+much easier than one becoming a celebrity oneself. Then, one could
+get that celebrity to communicate about a certain ideology. The
+trick is, one should make that celebrity extremely, extremely
+dangerous. Get them to sing about a certain ideology, but do it in
+a way that makes them legitimately dangerous. John Lennon wasn't
+dangerous to anyone. Michael Jackson might have been, but he wasn't
+assassinated. Same with Donald Trump. Same with Barack Obama. The
+only people who get assassinated are weak people. Abraham Lincoln
+was chronically depressed, he was of weak character and was an
+obvious target. Obvious targets will get assassinated, but
+important people are never obvious targets. Just because something
+bad could happen, doesn't mean that it has to happen or will
+happen, otherwise, we would be living in a nuclear fallout right
+now. There is a 1,000 page document of incredible detail, which, I
+should be clear, I am not supporting and the name and author of
+which I am not stating that suggests that people might have been
+living in time loops. I don't believe that this dystopian condition
+is the case anymore, and I don't think that this something to worry
+about, but supposedly there was a time reset about 60 years ago,
+after a nuclear war in the height of the Cold War. This would make
+sense. If there were too much of an ontological shift, then some
+high level factor might reset the sequence that would comprise the
+state of the time stream; however, the author of that book was not
+in control, nor was he strong, clever, influential or effective,
+nor was he unique and he died, ostensibly a suicide, but quite
+possibly a murder. He was not strong in character, and he was
+needlessly criticizing his own personal faith, and he didn’t
+provide methods to Try to overcome Reset Time (which I believe has
+since been overcome after the death of this individual; ironically
+his initials were KO.) The most effective way to make a celebrity
+your friend, would be to make them fall in love with you, and,
+failing that, one could Try to make them fall in love with someone
+else you know. One could meet them at meet and greets, or other
+places. This might be extremely important for maintaining (or
+establishing) peace and freedom. ) comes about as an attribute of
+the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this
+being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Time Loops come about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Space (or space-time) comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Other content (high level content, e.g., a high level version of
+matter and energy, before the physical universe comes into
+existence) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Commentary: all possible relations happen between concrete
+details. Concrete details would include such things as the physical
+universe, and it would also include such things as wombs,
+many-dimensional games, and all sorts of interesting phenomena that
+would exist around the physical universe.)</p>
+<p>Relation of all “concrete” details (Before this point, there was
+no relation of concrete details, hence no gravity, quantum
+entanglement, or anything else that will come into existence, or
+come into apparent existence, later) comes about as an attribute of
+the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this
+being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Implications of relations of all “concrete” details (high level
+gravity, high level quantum entanglement) comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Consistency of behavior of physical universe in physical
+universe space surrounding physical universe (gravity, quantum
+mechanics, etc.) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or
+“being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life
+or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Concrete details surrounding physical universe comes about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>A separating mark that would demark the physical universe as
+being separate, at least in part, from other ontological units (big
+bang, etc.) comes about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Commentary: People put so much emphasis on, put so much money
+towards, put so much propaganda towards, caring about a big bang
+and creating a “grand degrading narrative,” that people lose touch
+of the big picture, and start arrogantly making claims like that
+there “is” or “is not” a God, deities, etc., etc.</p>
+<p>People should just employ reason and not degrade each other.</p>
+<p>Such fixation has been put on an idea of a big bang.</p>
+<p>Such denialism has been put on the possibility of other factors
+that might exist as well.</p>
+<p>Without all of the factors preceding this point, a big bang
+cannot exist.</p>
+<p>A Big Bang is more like Step 1,000,000 in the process.</p>
+<p>An ontological unit of some kind demarks the physical universe
+from other ontological units.</p>
+<p>Only now in the process, does the physical universe exist.</p>
+<p>Galaxies come about as an attribute of the observer (or “being”
+one could call it, whether or not this being counts as life or
+would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order to
+justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Celestial bodies (stars, planets, asteroids, etc.) come about as
+an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether
+or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>The Milky Way galaxy as we know it in the present time comes
+about as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call
+it, whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of
+some sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering
+(again) to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>The solar system as we know it comes about as an attribute of
+the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this
+being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>The planets of the solar system as we know them come about as an
+attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or
+not this being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is
+beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>The Earth as we know it comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Life as we know it comes about as an attribute of the observer
+(or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being counts as
+life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point), in order
+to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<p>Tribes and cliques as we know them come about as an attribute of
+the observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this
+being counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the
+point), in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The
+Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism—
+these are all the same thing), first partially, then completely
+after the following process happens (think of it like a recursive
+function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Individual subtribes and cliques (China, Britain, France, U.S.A.
+and many other groups of human beings) as we know them come about
+as an attribute of the observer (or “being” one could call it,
+whether or not this being counts as life or would be a god of some
+sort is beside the point), in order to justify the ordering (again)
+to “The Eliminator” (or Simplification, or Mathematics, or
+Reductionism— these are all the same thing), first partially, then
+completely after the following process happens (think of it like a
+recursive function call in computer programming).</p>
+<p>Homo Sapiens as we know it comes about as an attribute of the
+observer (or “being” one could call it, whether or not this being
+counts as life or would be a god of some sort is beside the point),
+in order to justify the ordering (again) to “The Eliminator” (or
+Simplification, or Mathematics, or Reductionism— these are all the
+same thing), first partially, then completely after the following
+process happens (think of it like a recursive function call in
+computer programming).</p>
+<div style="text-align: center">
+	<p>After that, things can appear to exist, like a chair or a tree.
+	All of the fundamental ontological steps have been covered.</p>
+</div><div class='article_link'><a href="15.html">Previous article</a>
+<a href="index.html">Next article</a></div>
+</body>
+</html>