tnfr 4.5.2__py3-none-any.whl → 8.5.0__py3-none-any.whl

tnfr/operators/__init__.pyi

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+from typing import Any
+
+Operator: Any
+Emission: Any
+Reception: Any
+Coherence: Any
+Dissonance: Any
+Coupling: Any
+Resonance: Any
+Silence: Any
+Expansion: Any
+Contraction: Any
+SelfOrganization: Any
+Mutation: Any
+Transition: Any
+Recursivity: Any
+GLYPH_OPERATIONS: Any
+JitterCache: Any
+JitterCacheManager: Any
+OPERATORS: Any
+apply_glyph: Any
+apply_glyph_obj: Any
+apply_network_remesh: Any
+apply_remesh_if_globally_stable: Any
+apply_topological_remesh: Any
+discover_operators: Any
+get_glyph_factors: Any
+get_jitter_manager: Any
+get_neighbor_epi: Any
+random_jitter: Any
+reset_jitter_manager: Any

tnfr/operators/algebra.py

@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
+"""Algebraic properties and validation for TNFR structural operators.
+
+Based on TNFR.pdf Section 3.2.4 - "Notación funcional de operadores glíficos".
+
+This module implements formal validation of algebraic properties for structural
+operators in the TNFR glyphic algebra, particularly focusing on SHA (Silence)
+as the identity element in structural composition.
+
+Theoretical Foundation
+----------------------
+From TNFR.pdf §3.2.4 (p. 227-230) and the nodal equation ∂EPI/∂t = νf · ΔNFR(t):
+
+1. **SHA as Structural Identity**:
+   SHA(g(ω)) ≈ g(ω) for structure (EPI)
+
+   Physical basis: SHA reduces νf → 0, making ∂EPI/∂t → 0. This freezes
+   structural evolution, preserving whatever structure g created.
+
+2. **Idempotence**:
+   SHA^n = SHA for all n ≥ 1
+
+   Physical basis: Once νf ≈ 0, further SHA applications cannot reduce it more.
+   The effect is saturated.
+
+3. **Commutativity with NUL**:
+   SHA ∘ NUL = NUL ∘ SHA
+
+   Physical basis: SHA and NUL reduce orthogonal dimensions (νf vs EPI complexity).
+   Order of reduction doesn't affect final state.
+
+Category Theory Context
+-----------------------
+In the categorical framework (p. 231), SHA acts as identity morphism for
+the structural component:
+- Objects: Nodal configurations ω_i
+- Morphisms: Structural operators g: ω_i → ω_j
+- Identity: SHA: ω → ω (preserves structure)
+- Property: SHA ∘ g ≈ g (for EPI component)
+
+Note: SHA is NOT full identity (it modifies νf). It's identity for the
+structural aspect (EPI), not the dynamic aspect (νf).
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
+
+if TYPE_CHECKING:
+    from ..types import TNFRGraph, NodeId
+    from .definitions import Operator
+
+__all__ = [
+    "validate_identity_property",
+    "validate_idempotence",
+    "validate_commutativity_nul",
+]
+
+
+def validate_identity_property(
+    G: TNFRGraph,
+    node: NodeId,
+    operator: Operator,
+    tolerance: float = 0.01,
+) -> bool:
+    """Validate that SHA acts as identity for structure after operator.
+
+    Tests the algebraic property: SHA(g(ω)) ≈ g(ω) for EPI
+
+    This validates that applying SHA preserves the structural state (EPI)
+    achieved by the operator. SHA acts as a "pause" that freezes νf but
+    does not alter the structural form EPI.
+
+    Physical basis: From ∂EPI/∂t = νf · ΔNFR, when SHA reduces νf → 0,
+    structural evolution stops but current structure is preserved.
+
+    Parameters
+    ----------
+    G : TNFRGraph
+        Graph containing the node to validate
+    node : NodeId
+        Target node identifier
+    operator : Operator
+        Operator to test with SHA (must be valid generator like Emission)
+    tolerance : float, optional
+        Numerical tolerance for EPI comparison (default: 0.01)
+        Relaxed due to grammar-required intermediate operators
+
+    Returns
+    -------
+    bool
+        True if identity property holds within tolerance
+
+    Notes
+    -----
+    Due to TNFR grammar constraints (C1: must end with terminator,
+    C2: must include stabilizer), we test identity by comparing:
+
+    - Path 1: operator → Coherence → Dissonance (OZ terminator)
+    - Path 2: operator → Coherence → Silence (SHA terminator)
+
+    Both preserve structure after Coherence. If SHA is identity,
+    EPI should be equivalent in both paths.
+
+    Examples
+    --------
+    >>> from tnfr.structural import create_nfr
+    >>> from tnfr.operators.definitions import Emission
+    >>> from tnfr.operators.algebra import validate_identity_property
+    >>> G, node = create_nfr("test", epi=0.5, vf=1.0)
+    >>> validate_identity_property(G, node, Emission())  # doctest: +SKIP
+    True
+    """
+    from ..alias import get_attr
+    from ..constants.aliases import ALIAS_EPI
+    from .definitions import Silence, Coherence, Dissonance
+    from ..structural import run_sequence
+
+    # Path 1: operator → Coherence → Dissonance (without SHA)
+    # Valid grammar: generator → stabilizer → terminator
+    G1 = G.copy()
+    run_sequence(G1, node, [operator, Coherence(), Dissonance()])
+    epi_without_sha = float(get_attr(G1.nodes[node], ALIAS_EPI, 0.0))
+
+    # Path 2: operator → Coherence → Silence (SHA as terminator)
+    # Valid grammar: generator → stabilizer → terminator
+    G2 = G.copy()
+    run_sequence(G2, node, [operator, Coherence(), Silence()])
+    epi_with_sha = float(get_attr(G2.nodes[node], ALIAS_EPI, 0.0))
+
+    # SHA should preserve the structural result (EPI) from operator → coherence
+    # Both terminators should leave structure intact after stabilization
+    return abs(epi_without_sha - epi_with_sha) < tolerance
+
+
+def validate_idempotence(
+    G: TNFRGraph,
+    node: NodeId,
+    tolerance: float = 0.05,
+) -> bool:
+    """Validate that SHA is idempotent: SHA^n = SHA.
+
+    Tests the algebraic property: SHA(SHA(ω)) ≈ SHA(ω)
+
+    Physical basis: Once νf ≈ 0 after first SHA, subsequent applications
+    cannot reduce it further. The effect is saturated.
+
+    Due to grammar constraints against consecutive SHA operators, we test
+    idempotence by comparing SHA behavior in different sequence contexts.
+    The key property: SHA always has the same characteristic effect
+    (reduce νf to minimum, preserve EPI).
+
+    Parameters
+    ----------
+    G : TNFRGraph
+        Graph containing the node to validate
+    node : NodeId
+        Target node identifier
+    tolerance : float, optional
+        Numerical tolerance for νf comparison (default: 0.05)
+
+    Returns
+    -------
+    bool
+        True if idempotence holds (consistent SHA behavior)
+
+    Notes
+    -----
+    Tests SHA in two different contexts:
+    - Context 1: Emission → Coherence → Silence
+    - Context 2: Emission → Coherence → Resonance → Silence
+
+    In both cases, SHA should reduce νf to near-zero and preserve EPI.
+    This validates idempotent behavior: SHA effect is consistent and saturated.
+
+    Examples
+    --------
+    >>> from tnfr.structural import create_nfr
+    >>> from tnfr.operators.algebra import validate_idempotence
+    >>> G, node = create_nfr("test", epi=0.65, vf=1.30)
+    >>> validate_idempotence(G, node)  # doctest: +SKIP
+    True
+    """
+    from ..alias import get_attr
+    from ..constants.aliases import ALIAS_VF
+    from .definitions import Silence, Emission, Coherence, Resonance
+    from ..structural import run_sequence
+
+    # Test 1: SHA after simple sequence
+    G1 = G.copy()
+    run_sequence(G1, node, [Emission(), Coherence(), Silence()])
+    vf_context1 = float(get_attr(G1.nodes[node], ALIAS_VF, 0.0))
+
+    # Test 2: SHA after longer sequence (with Resonance added)
+    G2 = G.copy()
+    run_sequence(G2, node, [Emission(), Coherence(), Resonance(), Silence()])
+    vf_context2 = float(get_attr(G2.nodes[node], ALIAS_VF, 0.0))
+
+    # Idempotence property: SHA behavior is consistent
+    # Both νf values should be near-zero (SHA's characteristic effect)
+    vf_threshold = 0.15  # SHA should reduce νf below this
+    both_minimal = (vf_context1 < vf_threshold) and (vf_context2 < vf_threshold)
+
+    # Both should be similar (consistent behavior)
+    consistent = abs(vf_context1 - vf_context2) < tolerance
+
+    return both_minimal and consistent
+
+
+def validate_commutativity_nul(
+    G: TNFRGraph,
+    node: NodeId,
+    tolerance: float = 0.02,
+) -> bool:
+    """Validate that SHA and NUL commute: SHA(NUL(ω)) ≈ NUL(SHA(ω)).
+
+    Tests the algebraic property that Silence and Contraction can be applied
+    in either order with equivalent results.
+
+    Physical basis: SHA and NUL reduce orthogonal dimensions of state space:
+    - SHA reduces νf (reorganization capacity)
+    - NUL reduces EPI complexity (structural dimensionality)
+
+    Since they act on independent dimensions, order doesn't matter for
+    final state.
+
+    Parameters
+    ----------
+    G : TNFRGraph
+        Graph containing the node to validate
+    node : NodeId
+        Target node identifier
+    tolerance : float, optional
+        Numerical tolerance for EPI and νf comparison (default: 0.02)
+
+    Returns
+    -------
+    bool
+        True if commutativity holds within tolerance
+
+    Notes
+    -----
+    Tests two paths (both grammar-valid, using Transition as generator):
+    1. Transition → Silence → Contraction
+    2. Transition → Contraction → Silence
+
+    The property holds if both paths result in equivalent EPI and νf values.
+
+    Examples
+    --------
+    >>> from tnfr.structural import create_nfr
+    >>> from tnfr.operators.algebra import validate_commutativity_nul
+    >>> G, node = create_nfr("test", epi=0.55, vf=1.10)
+    >>> validate_commutativity_nul(G, node)  # doctest: +SKIP
+    True
+    """
+    from ..alias import get_attr
+    from ..constants.aliases import ALIAS_EPI, ALIAS_VF
+    from .definitions import Silence, Contraction, Transition
+    from ..structural import run_sequence
+
+    # Path 1: NAV → SHA → NUL (Transition then Silence then Contraction)
+    G1 = G.copy()
+    run_sequence(G1, node, [Transition(), Silence(), Contraction()])
+    epi_sha_nul = float(get_attr(G1.nodes[node], ALIAS_EPI, 0.0))
+    vf_sha_nul = float(get_attr(G1.nodes[node], ALIAS_VF, 0.0))
+
+    # Path 2: NAV → NUL → SHA (Transition then Contraction then Silence)
+    G2 = G.copy()
+    run_sequence(G2, node, [Transition(), Contraction(), Silence()])
+    epi_nul_sha = float(get_attr(G2.nodes[node], ALIAS_EPI, 0.0))
+    vf_nul_sha = float(get_attr(G2.nodes[node], ALIAS_VF, 0.0))
+
+    # Validate commutativity: both paths should produce similar results
+    epi_commutes = abs(epi_sha_nul - epi_nul_sha) < tolerance
+    vf_commutes = abs(vf_sha_nul - vf_nul_sha) < tolerance
+
+    return epi_commutes and vf_commutes