careamics 0.0.1__py3-none-any.whl → 0.0.3__py3-none-any.whl

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Potentially problematic release.


This version of careamics might be problematic. Click here for more details.

Files changed (155) hide show
  1. careamics/__init__.py +6 -1
  2. careamics/careamist.py +729 -0
  3. careamics/config/__init__.py +39 -0
  4. careamics/config/architectures/__init__.py +17 -0
  5. careamics/config/architectures/architecture_model.py +37 -0
  6. careamics/config/architectures/custom_model.py +162 -0
  7. careamics/config/architectures/lvae_model.py +174 -0
  8. careamics/config/architectures/register_model.py +103 -0
  9. careamics/config/architectures/unet_model.py +118 -0
  10. careamics/config/callback_model.py +123 -0
  11. careamics/config/configuration_factory.py +583 -0
  12. careamics/config/configuration_model.py +604 -0
  13. careamics/config/data_model.py +527 -0
  14. careamics/config/fcn_algorithm_model.py +147 -0
  15. careamics/config/inference_model.py +239 -0
  16. careamics/config/likelihood_model.py +43 -0
  17. careamics/config/nm_model.py +101 -0
  18. careamics/config/optimizer_models.py +187 -0
  19. careamics/config/references/__init__.py +45 -0
  20. careamics/config/references/algorithm_descriptions.py +132 -0
  21. careamics/config/references/references.py +39 -0
  22. careamics/config/support/__init__.py +31 -0
  23. careamics/config/support/supported_activations.py +27 -0
  24. careamics/config/support/supported_algorithms.py +33 -0
  25. careamics/config/support/supported_architectures.py +17 -0
  26. careamics/config/support/supported_data.py +109 -0
  27. careamics/config/support/supported_loggers.py +10 -0
  28. careamics/config/support/supported_losses.py +29 -0
  29. careamics/config/support/supported_optimizers.py +57 -0
  30. careamics/config/support/supported_pixel_manipulations.py +15 -0
  31. careamics/config/support/supported_struct_axis.py +21 -0
  32. careamics/config/support/supported_transforms.py +11 -0
  33. careamics/config/tile_information.py +65 -0
  34. careamics/config/training_model.py +72 -0
  35. careamics/config/transformations/__init__.py +15 -0
  36. careamics/config/transformations/n2v_manipulate_model.py +64 -0
  37. careamics/config/transformations/normalize_model.py +60 -0
  38. careamics/config/transformations/transform_model.py +45 -0
  39. careamics/config/transformations/xy_flip_model.py +43 -0
  40. careamics/config/transformations/xy_random_rotate90_model.py +35 -0
  41. careamics/config/vae_algorithm_model.py +171 -0
  42. careamics/config/validators/__init__.py +5 -0
  43. careamics/config/validators/validator_utils.py +101 -0
  44. careamics/conftest.py +39 -0
  45. careamics/dataset/__init__.py +17 -0
  46. careamics/dataset/dataset_utils/__init__.py +19 -0
  47. careamics/dataset/dataset_utils/dataset_utils.py +101 -0
  48. careamics/dataset/dataset_utils/file_utils.py +141 -0
  49. careamics/dataset/dataset_utils/iterate_over_files.py +83 -0
  50. careamics/dataset/dataset_utils/running_stats.py +186 -0
  51. careamics/dataset/in_memory_dataset.py +310 -0
  52. careamics/dataset/in_memory_pred_dataset.py +88 -0
  53. careamics/dataset/in_memory_tiled_pred_dataset.py +129 -0
  54. careamics/dataset/iterable_dataset.py +295 -0
  55. careamics/dataset/iterable_pred_dataset.py +122 -0
  56. careamics/dataset/iterable_tiled_pred_dataset.py +140 -0
  57. careamics/dataset/patching/__init__.py +1 -0
  58. careamics/dataset/patching/patching.py +299 -0
  59. careamics/dataset/patching/random_patching.py +201 -0
  60. careamics/dataset/patching/sequential_patching.py +212 -0
  61. careamics/dataset/patching/validate_patch_dimension.py +64 -0
  62. careamics/dataset/tiling/__init__.py +10 -0
  63. careamics/dataset/tiling/collate_tiles.py +33 -0
  64. careamics/dataset/tiling/lvae_tiled_patching.py +282 -0
  65. careamics/dataset/tiling/tiled_patching.py +164 -0
  66. careamics/dataset/zarr_dataset.py +151 -0
  67. careamics/file_io/__init__.py +15 -0
  68. careamics/file_io/read/__init__.py +12 -0
  69. careamics/file_io/read/get_func.py +56 -0
  70. careamics/file_io/read/tiff.py +58 -0
  71. careamics/file_io/read/zarr.py +60 -0
  72. careamics/file_io/write/__init__.py +15 -0
  73. careamics/file_io/write/get_func.py +63 -0
  74. careamics/file_io/write/tiff.py +40 -0
  75. careamics/lightning/__init__.py +18 -0
  76. careamics/lightning/callbacks/__init__.py +11 -0
  77. careamics/lightning/callbacks/hyperparameters_callback.py +49 -0
  78. careamics/lightning/callbacks/prediction_writer_callback/__init__.py +20 -0
  79. careamics/lightning/callbacks/prediction_writer_callback/file_path_utils.py +56 -0
  80. careamics/lightning/callbacks/prediction_writer_callback/prediction_writer_callback.py +233 -0
  81. careamics/lightning/callbacks/prediction_writer_callback/write_strategy.py +398 -0
  82. careamics/lightning/callbacks/prediction_writer_callback/write_strategy_factory.py +215 -0
  83. careamics/lightning/callbacks/progress_bar_callback.py +90 -0
  84. careamics/lightning/lightning_module.py +632 -0
  85. careamics/lightning/predict_data_module.py +333 -0
  86. careamics/lightning/train_data_module.py +680 -0
  87. careamics/losses/__init__.py +15 -0
  88. careamics/losses/fcn/__init__.py +1 -0
  89. careamics/losses/fcn/losses.py +98 -0
  90. careamics/losses/loss_factory.py +155 -0
  91. careamics/losses/lvae/__init__.py +1 -0
  92. careamics/losses/lvae/loss_utils.py +83 -0
  93. careamics/losses/lvae/losses.py +445 -0
  94. careamics/lvae_training/__init__.py +0 -0
  95. careamics/lvae_training/dataset/__init__.py +0 -0
  96. careamics/lvae_training/dataset/data_utils.py +701 -0
  97. careamics/lvae_training/dataset/lc_dataset.py +259 -0
  98. careamics/lvae_training/dataset/lc_dataset_config.py +13 -0
  99. careamics/lvae_training/dataset/vae_data_config.py +179 -0
  100. careamics/lvae_training/dataset/vae_dataset.py +1054 -0
  101. careamics/lvae_training/eval_utils.py +905 -0
  102. careamics/lvae_training/get_config.py +84 -0
  103. careamics/lvae_training/lightning_module.py +701 -0
  104. careamics/lvae_training/metrics.py +214 -0
  105. careamics/lvae_training/train_lvae.py +342 -0
  106. careamics/lvae_training/train_utils.py +121 -0
  107. careamics/model_io/__init__.py +7 -0
  108. careamics/model_io/bioimage/__init__.py +11 -0
  109. careamics/model_io/bioimage/_readme_factory.py +121 -0
  110. careamics/model_io/bioimage/bioimage_utils.py +52 -0
  111. careamics/model_io/bioimage/model_description.py +327 -0
  112. careamics/model_io/bmz_io.py +246 -0
  113. careamics/model_io/model_io_utils.py +95 -0
  114. careamics/models/__init__.py +5 -0
  115. careamics/models/activation.py +39 -0
  116. careamics/models/layers.py +493 -0
  117. careamics/models/lvae/__init__.py +3 -0
  118. careamics/models/lvae/layers.py +1998 -0
  119. careamics/models/lvae/likelihoods.py +364 -0
  120. careamics/models/lvae/lvae.py +901 -0
  121. careamics/models/lvae/noise_models.py +541 -0
  122. careamics/models/lvae/utils.py +395 -0
  123. careamics/models/model_factory.py +67 -0
  124. careamics/models/unet.py +443 -0
  125. careamics/prediction_utils/__init__.py +10 -0
  126. careamics/prediction_utils/lvae_prediction.py +158 -0
  127. careamics/prediction_utils/lvae_tiling_manager.py +362 -0
  128. careamics/prediction_utils/prediction_outputs.py +135 -0
  129. careamics/prediction_utils/stitch_prediction.py +112 -0
  130. careamics/transforms/__init__.py +20 -0
  131. careamics/transforms/compose.py +107 -0
  132. careamics/transforms/n2v_manipulate.py +146 -0
  133. careamics/transforms/normalize.py +243 -0
  134. careamics/transforms/pixel_manipulation.py +407 -0
  135. careamics/transforms/struct_mask_parameters.py +20 -0
  136. careamics/transforms/transform.py +24 -0
  137. careamics/transforms/tta.py +88 -0
  138. careamics/transforms/xy_flip.py +123 -0
  139. careamics/transforms/xy_random_rotate90.py +101 -0
  140. careamics/utils/__init__.py +19 -0
  141. careamics/utils/autocorrelation.py +40 -0
  142. careamics/utils/base_enum.py +60 -0
  143. careamics/utils/context.py +66 -0
  144. careamics/utils/logging.py +322 -0
  145. careamics/utils/metrics.py +188 -0
  146. careamics/utils/path_utils.py +26 -0
  147. careamics/utils/ram.py +15 -0
  148. careamics/utils/receptive_field.py +108 -0
  149. careamics/utils/torch_utils.py +127 -0
  150. careamics-0.0.3.dist-info/METADATA +78 -0
  151. careamics-0.0.3.dist-info/RECORD +154 -0
  152. {careamics-0.0.1.dist-info → careamics-0.0.3.dist-info}/WHEEL +1 -1
  153. {careamics-0.0.1.dist-info → careamics-0.0.3.dist-info}/licenses/LICENSE +1 -1
  154. careamics-0.0.1.dist-info/METADATA +0 -46
  155. careamics-0.0.1.dist-info/RECORD +0 -6
@@ -0,0 +1,445 @@
1
+ """Methods for Loss Computation."""
2
+
3
+ from __future__ import annotations
4
+
5
+ from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, Optional, Union
6
+
7
+ import numpy as np
8
+ import torch
9
+
10
+ from careamics.losses.lvae.loss_utils import free_bits_kl, get_kl_weight
11
+ from careamics.models.lvae.likelihoods import (
12
+ GaussianLikelihood,
13
+ LikelihoodModule,
14
+ NoiseModelLikelihood,
15
+ )
16
+ from careamics.models.lvae.utils import compute_batch_mean
17
+
18
+ if TYPE_CHECKING:
19
+ from careamics.losses.loss_factory import LVAELossParameters
20
+
21
+ Likelihood = Union[LikelihoodModule, GaussianLikelihood, NoiseModelLikelihood]
22
+
23
+
24
+ def get_reconstruction_loss(
25
+ reconstruction: torch.Tensor, # TODO: naming -> predictions?
26
+ target: torch.Tensor,
27
+ likelihood_obj: Likelihood,
28
+ ) -> dict[str, torch.Tensor]:
29
+ """Compute the reconstruction loss.
30
+
31
+ Parameters
32
+ ----------
33
+ reconstruction: torch.Tensor
34
+ The output of the LVAE decoder. Shape is (B, C, [Z], Y, X), where C is the
35
+ number of output channels (e.g., 1 in HDN, >1 in muSplit/denoiSplit).
36
+ target: torch.Tensor
37
+ The target image used to compute the reconstruction loss. Shape is
38
+ (B, C, [Z], Y, X), where C is the number of output channels
39
+ (e.g., 1 in HDN, >1 in muSplit/denoiSplit).
40
+ likelihood_obj: Likelihood
41
+ The likelihood object used to compute the reconstruction loss.
42
+
43
+ Returns
44
+ -------
45
+ dict[str, torch.Tensor]
46
+ A dictionary containing the overall loss `["loss"]` and the loss for
47
+ individual output channels `["ch{i}_loss"]`.
48
+ """
49
+ loss_dict = _get_reconstruction_loss_vector(
50
+ reconstruction=reconstruction,
51
+ target=target,
52
+ likelihood_obj=likelihood_obj,
53
+ )
54
+
55
+ loss_dict["loss"] = loss_dict["loss"].sum() / len(reconstruction)
56
+ for i in range(1, 1 + target.shape[1]):
57
+ key = f"ch{i}_loss"
58
+ loss_dict[key] = loss_dict[key].sum() / len(reconstruction)
59
+
60
+ return loss_dict
61
+
62
+
63
+ def _get_reconstruction_loss_vector(
64
+ reconstruction: torch.Tensor, # TODO: naming -> predictions?
65
+ target: torch.Tensor,
66
+ likelihood_obj: LikelihoodModule,
67
+ ) -> dict[str, torch.Tensor]:
68
+ """Compute the reconstruction loss.
69
+
70
+ Parameters
71
+ ----------
72
+ return_predicted_img: bool
73
+ If set to `True`, the besides the loss, the reconstructed image is returned.
74
+ Default is `False`.
75
+
76
+ Returns
77
+ -------
78
+ dict[str, torch.Tensor]
79
+ A dictionary containing the overall loss `["loss"]` and the loss for
80
+ individual output channels `["ch{i}_loss"]`. Shape of individual
81
+ tensors is (B, ).
82
+ """
83
+ output = {"loss": None}
84
+ for i in range(1, 1 + target.shape[1]):
85
+ output[f"ch{i}_loss"] = None
86
+
87
+ # Compute Log likelihood
88
+ ll, _ = likelihood_obj(reconstruction, target) # shape: (B, C, [Z], Y, X)
89
+
90
+ output = {"loss": compute_batch_mean(-1 * ll)} # shape: (B, )
91
+ if ll.shape[1] > 1: # target_ch > 1
92
+ for i in range(1, 1 + target.shape[1]):
93
+ output[f"ch{i}_loss"] = compute_batch_mean(-ll[:, i - 1]) # shape: (B, )
94
+ else: # target_ch == 1
95
+ # TODO: hacky!!! Refactor this
96
+ assert ll.shape[1] == 1
97
+ output["ch1_loss"] = output["loss"]
98
+ output["ch2_loss"] = output["loss"]
99
+
100
+ return output
101
+
102
+
103
+ def reconstruction_loss_musplit_denoisplit(
104
+ predictions: Union[torch.Tensor, tuple[torch.Tensor, torch.Tensor]],
105
+ targets: torch.Tensor,
106
+ nm_likelihood: NoiseModelLikelihood,
107
+ gaussian_likelihood: GaussianLikelihood,
108
+ nm_weight: float,
109
+ gaussian_weight: float,
110
+ ) -> torch.Tensor:
111
+ """Compute the reconstruction loss for muSplit-denoiSplit loss.
112
+
113
+ The resulting loss is a weighted mean of the noise model likelihood and the
114
+ Gaussian likelihood.
115
+
116
+ Parameters
117
+ ----------
118
+ predictions : torch.Tensor
119
+ The output of the LVAE decoder. Shape is (B, C, [Z], Y, X), or
120
+ (B, 2*C, [Z], Y, X), where C is the number of output channels,
121
+ and the factor of 2 is for the case of predicted log-variance.
122
+ targets : torch.Tensor
123
+ The target image used to compute the reconstruction loss. Shape is
124
+ (B, C, [Z], Y, X), where C is the number of output channels
125
+ (e.g., 1 in HDN, >1 in muSplit/denoiSplit).
126
+ nm_likelihood : NoiseModelLikelihood
127
+ A `NoiseModelLikelihood` object used to compute the noise model likelihood.
128
+ gaussian_likelihood : GaussianLikelihood
129
+ A `GaussianLikelihood` object used to compute the Gaussian likelihood.
130
+ nm_weight : float
131
+ The weight for the noise model likelihood.
132
+ gaussian_weight : float
133
+ The weight for the Gaussian likelihood.
134
+
135
+ Returns
136
+ -------
137
+ recons_loss : torch.Tensor
138
+ The reconstruction loss. Shape is (1, ).
139
+ """
140
+ # TODO: is this safe to check for predict_logvar value?
141
+ # otherwise use `gaussian_likelihood.predict_logvar` (or both)
142
+ if predictions.shape[1] == 2 * targets.shape[1]:
143
+ # predictions contain both mean and log-variance
144
+ out_mean, _ = predictions.chunk(2, dim=1)
145
+ else:
146
+ out_mean = predictions
147
+
148
+ recons_loss_nm = -1 * nm_likelihood(out_mean, targets)[0].mean()
149
+ recons_loss_gm = -1 * gaussian_likelihood(predictions, targets)[0].mean()
150
+ recons_loss = nm_weight * recons_loss_nm + gaussian_weight * recons_loss_gm
151
+ return recons_loss
152
+
153
+
154
+ def get_kl_divergence_loss_usplit(
155
+ topdown_data: dict[str, list[torch.Tensor]], kl_key: str = "kl"
156
+ ) -> torch.Tensor:
157
+ """Compute the KL divergence loss for muSplit.
158
+
159
+ Parameters
160
+ ----------
161
+ topdown_data : dict[str, list[torch.Tensor]]
162
+ A dictionary containing information computed for each layer during the top-down
163
+ pass. The dictionary must include the following keys:
164
+ - "kl": The KL-loss values for each layer. Shape of each tensor is (B,).
165
+ - "z": The sampled latents for each layer. Shape of each tensor is
166
+ (B, layers, `z_dims[i]`, H, W).
167
+ kl_key : str
168
+ The key for the KL-loss values in the top-down layer data dictionary.
169
+ To choose among ["kl", "kl_restricted", "kl_spatial", "kl_channelwise"]
170
+ Default is "kl".
171
+ """
172
+ kl = torch.cat(
173
+ [kl_layer.unsqueeze(1) for kl_layer in topdown_data[kl_key]], dim=1
174
+ ) # shape: (B, n_layers)
175
+ # NOTE: Values are sum() and so are of the order 30000
176
+
177
+ nlayers = kl.shape[1]
178
+ for i in range(nlayers):
179
+ # NOTE: we want to normalize the KL-loss w.r.t. the latent space dimensions,
180
+ # i.e., the number of entries in the latent space tensors (C, [Z], Y, X).
181
+ # We assume z has shape (B, C, [Z], Y, X), where `C = z_dims[i]`.
182
+ norm_factor = np.prod(topdown_data["z"][i].shape[1:])
183
+ kl[:, i] = kl[:, i] / norm_factor
184
+
185
+ kl_loss = free_bits_kl(kl, 0.0).mean() # shape: (1, )
186
+ # NOTE: free_bits disabled!
187
+ return kl_loss
188
+
189
+
190
+ def get_kl_divergence_loss_denoisplit(
191
+ topdown_data: dict[str, torch.Tensor],
192
+ img_shape: tuple[int],
193
+ kl_key: str = "kl",
194
+ ) -> torch.Tensor:
195
+ """Compute the KL divergence loss for denoiSplit.
196
+
197
+ Parameters
198
+ ----------
199
+ topdown_data : dict[str, torch.Tensor]
200
+ A dictionary containing information computed for each layer during the top-down
201
+ pass. The dictionary must include the following keys:
202
+ - "kl": The KL-loss values for each layer. Shape of each tensor is (B,).
203
+ - "z": The sampled latents for each layer. Shape of each tensor is
204
+ (B, layers, `z_dims[i]`, H, W).
205
+ img_shape : tuple[int]
206
+ The shape of the input image to the LVAE model. Shape is ([Z], Y, X).
207
+ kl_key : str
208
+ The key for the KL-loss values in the top-down layer data dictionary.
209
+ To choose among ["kl", "kl_restricted", "kl_spatial", "kl_channelwise"]
210
+ Default is "kl"
211
+
212
+ kl[i] for each i has length batch_size resulting kl shape: (bs, layers).
213
+ """
214
+ kl = torch.cat(
215
+ [kl_layer.unsqueeze(1) for kl_layer in topdown_data[kl_key]],
216
+ dim=1,
217
+ )
218
+
219
+ kl_loss = free_bits_kl(kl, 1.0).sum()
220
+ # NOTE: as compared to uSplit kl divergence, this KL loss is larger by a factor of
221
+ # `n_layers` since we sum KL contributions from different layers instead of taking
222
+ # the mean.
223
+
224
+ # NOTE: at each hierarchy, the KL loss is larger by a factor of (128/i**2).
225
+ # 128/(2*2) = 32 (bottommost layer)
226
+ # 128/(4*4) = 8
227
+ # 128/(8*8) = 2
228
+ # 128/(16*16) = 0.5 (topmost layer)
229
+
230
+ # Normalize the KL-loss w.r.t. the input image spatial dimensions (e.g., 64x64)
231
+ kl_loss = kl_loss / np.prod(img_shape)
232
+ return kl_loss
233
+
234
+
235
+ # TODO: @melisande-c suggested to refactor this as a class (see PR #208)
236
+ # - loss computation happens by calling the `__call__` method
237
+ # - `__init__` method initializes the loss parameters now contained in
238
+ # the `LVAELossParameters` class
239
+ # NOTE: same for the other loss functions
240
+ def musplit_loss(
241
+ model_outputs: tuple[torch.Tensor, dict[str, Any]],
242
+ targets: torch.Tensor,
243
+ loss_parameters: LVAELossParameters,
244
+ ) -> Optional[dict[str, torch.Tensor]]:
245
+ """Loss function for muSplit.
246
+
247
+ Parameters
248
+ ----------
249
+ model_outputs : tuple[torch.Tensor, dict[str, Any]]
250
+ Tuple containing the model predictions (shape is (B, `target_ch`, [Z], Y, X))
251
+ and the top-down layer data (e.g., sampled latents, KL-loss values, etc.).
252
+ targets : torch.Tensor
253
+ The target image used to compute the reconstruction loss. Shape is
254
+ (B, `target_ch`, [Z], Y, X).
255
+ loss_parameters : LVAELossParameters
256
+ The loss parameters for muSplit (e.g., KL hyperparameters, likelihood module,
257
+ noise model, etc.).
258
+
259
+ Returns
260
+ -------
261
+ output : Optional[dict[str, torch.Tensor]]
262
+ A dictionary containing the overall loss `["loss"]`, the reconstruction loss
263
+ `["reconstruction_loss"]`, and the KL divergence loss `["kl_loss"]`.
264
+ """
265
+ predictions, td_data = model_outputs
266
+
267
+ # Reconstruction loss computation
268
+ recons_loss_dict = get_reconstruction_loss(
269
+ reconstruction=predictions,
270
+ target=targets,
271
+ likelihood_obj=loss_parameters.gaussian_likelihood,
272
+ )
273
+ recons_loss = recons_loss_dict["loss"] * loss_parameters.reconstruction_weight
274
+ if torch.isnan(recons_loss).any():
275
+ recons_loss = 0.0
276
+
277
+ # KL loss computation
278
+ kl_weight = get_kl_weight(
279
+ loss_parameters.kl_annealing,
280
+ loss_parameters.kl_start,
281
+ loss_parameters.kl_annealtime,
282
+ loss_parameters.kl_weight,
283
+ loss_parameters.current_epoch,
284
+ )
285
+ kl_loss = kl_weight * get_kl_divergence_loss_usplit(td_data)
286
+
287
+ net_loss = recons_loss + kl_loss
288
+ output = {
289
+ "loss": net_loss,
290
+ "reconstruction_loss": (
291
+ recons_loss.detach()
292
+ if isinstance(recons_loss, torch.Tensor)
293
+ else recons_loss
294
+ ),
295
+ "kl_loss": kl_loss.detach(),
296
+ }
297
+ # https://github.com/openai/vdvae/blob/main/train.py#L26
298
+ if torch.isnan(net_loss).any():
299
+ return None
300
+
301
+ return output
302
+
303
+
304
+ def denoisplit_loss(
305
+ model_outputs: tuple[torch.Tensor, dict[str, Any]],
306
+ targets: torch.Tensor,
307
+ loss_parameters: LVAELossParameters,
308
+ ) -> Optional[dict[str, torch.Tensor]]:
309
+ """Loss function for DenoiSplit.
310
+
311
+ Parameters
312
+ ----------
313
+ model_outputs : tuple[torch.Tensor, dict[str, Any]]
314
+ Tuple containing the model predictions (shape is (B, `target_ch`, [Z], Y, X))
315
+ and the top-down layer data (e.g., sampled latents, KL-loss values, etc.).
316
+ targets : torch.Tensor
317
+ The target image used to compute the reconstruction loss. Shape is
318
+ (B, `target_ch`, [Z], Y, X).
319
+ loss_parameters : LVAELossParameters
320
+ The loss parameters for muSplit (e.g., KL hyperparameters, likelihood module,
321
+ noise model, etc.).
322
+
323
+ Returns
324
+ -------
325
+ output : Optional[dict[str, torch.Tensor]]
326
+ A dictionary containing the overall loss `["loss"]`, the reconstruction loss
327
+ `["reconstruction_loss"]`, and the KL divergence loss `["kl_loss"]`.
328
+ """
329
+ predictions, td_data = model_outputs
330
+
331
+ # Reconstruction loss computation
332
+ recons_loss_dict = get_reconstruction_loss(
333
+ reconstruction=predictions,
334
+ target=targets,
335
+ likelihood_obj=loss_parameters.noise_model_likelihood,
336
+ )
337
+ recons_loss = recons_loss_dict["loss"] * loss_parameters.reconstruction_weight
338
+ if torch.isnan(recons_loss).any():
339
+ recons_loss = 0.0
340
+
341
+ # KL loss computation
342
+ if loss_parameters.non_stochastic: # TODO always false ?
343
+ kl_loss = torch.Tensor([0.0]).cuda()
344
+ else:
345
+ kl_weight = get_kl_weight(
346
+ loss_parameters.kl_annealing,
347
+ loss_parameters.kl_start,
348
+ loss_parameters.kl_annealtime,
349
+ loss_parameters.kl_weight,
350
+ loss_parameters.current_epoch,
351
+ )
352
+ kl_loss = kl_weight * get_kl_divergence_loss_denoisplit(
353
+ topdown_data=td_data,
354
+ img_shape=targets.shape[2:], # input img spatial dims
355
+ )
356
+
357
+ net_loss = recons_loss + kl_loss
358
+ output = {
359
+ "loss": net_loss,
360
+ "reconstruction_loss": (
361
+ recons_loss.detach()
362
+ if isinstance(recons_loss, torch.Tensor)
363
+ else recons_loss
364
+ ),
365
+ "kl_loss": kl_loss.detach(),
366
+ }
367
+ # https://github.com/openai/vdvae/blob/main/train.py#L26
368
+ if torch.isnan(net_loss).any():
369
+ return None
370
+
371
+ return output
372
+
373
+
374
+ def denoisplit_musplit_loss(
375
+ model_outputs: tuple[torch.Tensor, dict[str, Any]],
376
+ targets: torch.Tensor,
377
+ loss_parameters: LVAELossParameters,
378
+ ) -> Optional[dict[str, torch.Tensor]]:
379
+ """Loss function for DenoiSplit.
380
+
381
+ Parameters
382
+ ----------
383
+ model_outputs : tuple[torch.Tensor, dict[str, Any]]
384
+ Tuple containing the model predictions (shape is (B, `target_ch`, [Z], Y, X))
385
+ and the top-down layer data (e.g., sampled latents, KL-loss values, etc.).
386
+ targets : torch.Tensor
387
+ The target image used to compute the reconstruction loss. Shape is
388
+ (B, `target_ch`, [Z], Y, X).
389
+ loss_parameters : LVAELossParameters
390
+ The loss parameters for muSplit (e.g., KL hyperparameters, likelihood module,
391
+ noise model, etc.).
392
+
393
+ Returns
394
+ -------
395
+ output : Optional[dict[str, torch.Tensor]]
396
+ A dictionary containing the overall loss `["loss"]`, the reconstruction loss
397
+ `["reconstruction_loss"]`, and the KL divergence loss `["kl_loss"]`.
398
+ """
399
+ predictions, td_data = model_outputs
400
+
401
+ # Reconstruction loss computation
402
+ recons_loss = reconstruction_loss_musplit_denoisplit(
403
+ predictions=predictions,
404
+ targets=targets,
405
+ nm_likelihood=loss_parameters.noise_model_likelihood,
406
+ gaussian_likelihood=loss_parameters.gaussian_likelihood,
407
+ nm_weight=loss_parameters.denoisplit_weight,
408
+ gaussian_weight=loss_parameters.musplit_weight,
409
+ )
410
+ if torch.isnan(recons_loss).any():
411
+ recons_loss = 0.0
412
+
413
+ # KL loss computation
414
+ if loss_parameters.non_stochastic: # TODO always false ?
415
+ kl_loss = torch.Tensor([0.0]).cuda()
416
+ else:
417
+ # NOTE: 'kl' key stands for the 'kl_samplewise' key in the TopDownLayer class.
418
+ # The different naming comes from `top_down_pass()` method in the LadderVAE.
419
+ denoisplit_kl = get_kl_divergence_loss_denoisplit(
420
+ topdown_data=td_data,
421
+ img_shape=targets.shape[2:], # input img spatial dims
422
+ )
423
+ musplit_kl = get_kl_divergence_loss_usplit(td_data)
424
+ kl_loss = (
425
+ loss_parameters.denoisplit_weight * denoisplit_kl
426
+ + loss_parameters.musplit_weight * musplit_kl
427
+ )
428
+ # TODO `kl_weight` is hardcoded (???)
429
+ kl_loss = loss_parameters.kl_weight * kl_loss
430
+
431
+ net_loss = recons_loss + kl_loss
432
+ output = {
433
+ "loss": net_loss,
434
+ "reconstruction_loss": (
435
+ recons_loss.detach()
436
+ if isinstance(recons_loss, torch.Tensor)
437
+ else recons_loss
438
+ ),
439
+ "kl_loss": kl_loss.detach(),
440
+ }
441
+ # https://github.com/openai/vdvae/blob/main/train.py#L26
442
+ if torch.isnan(net_loss).any():
443
+ return None
444
+
445
+ return output
File without changes
File without changes