universal-physics-tensor 10.0.0 → 11.0.0

package/data/bridge-catalog.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "$schema": "./bridge-catalog.schema.json",
   "schemaVersion": 3,
-  "packageVersion": "10.0.0",
+  "packageVersion": "11.0.0",
   "entries": [
     {
       "id": 11,
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Explains how quantum superpositions collapse to classical states via environmental interaction",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{\\partial \\rho}{\\partial t} = -\\frac{i}{\\hbar}[H, \\rho] + \\sum_k \\gamma_k(\\lambda) \\left[ L_k \\rho L_k^\\dagger - \\frac{1}{2}\\{L_k^\\dagger L_k, \\rho\\} \\right], \\quad \\gamma_k(\\lambda) = \\gamma_0 \\left(\\frac{\\lambda}{\\lambda_0}\\right)^2",
       "source_part": "I",
@@ -34,6 +35,7 @@
         "transformation": "rho_total on (system (x) environment) -> rho = Tr_env rho_total, under Born-Markov (weak coupling; environment correlation time << system relaxation time)"
       },
       "formalKey": "be-11",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Lindblad.preserve",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -55,6 +57,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Thermal de Broglie wavelength: the canonical thermal-coherence length scale for a free quantum particle of mass m at temperature T",
       "formula_latex": "\\lambda_T = \\sqrt{\\frac{2\\pi \\hbar^2}{m k_B T}} = \\frac{h}{\\sqrt{2\\pi m k_B T}}",
       "source_part": "I",
@@ -79,6 +82,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[length]",
       "notes": "Dimensional fix 2026-05-06 (Wave Q A2, per Math iter-6 C2): dropped γ; reverted to canonical thermal de Broglie wavelength. The Wave P-B R-B1 form ξ = ℏ/√(2 m k_B T γ) doesn't yield length under either γ convention (γ as Ohmic friction with [γ] = 1/s gives ℏ/√(kg·J·(1/s)) = ℏ/√(kg²·m²/s³) = √s, not length; γ as a dimensionless coefficient leaves an arbitrary numerical scaling). Reformulated to the strictly-canonical thermal de Broglie wavelength λ_T = ℏ / √(2π m k_B T): [ℏ] = J·s = kg·m²/s; [m k_B T] = kg·J = kg²·m²/s²; √(2π m k_B T) = kg·m/s; ℏ / (kg·m/s) = m. ✓ The dependency on BE-11 is preserved as a framing dependency (BE-11 provides the bath coupling whose decoherence the thermal-de-Broglie length characterises in the limit of weak Ohmic friction; the explicit γ-prefactor is dropped). | Reformulated 2026-05-06 (Wave P-B R-B1, per Math iter-5 / Researcher iter-5 strategic pivot — complete bridges to canonical literature forms when one exists, rather than preserving R3-invalid). Replaced the structurally ill-defined ξ_coh(T,N) = ξ_0 / √(1 + N/N_c + (T/T_c)^ν) ansatz (three undefined quantities ξ_0, ω_decoherence, cube exponent in N_c) with the canonical Caldeira-Leggett dephasing form, then in Wave Q A2 collapsed to the canonical thermal de Broglie wavelength when the γ-prefactor was found dimensionally inconsistent. Status set to 'speculative' (not 'established') because the *mesoscopic-coherence framing* — using a single-particle thermal-de-Broglie length as an N-particle coherence length — extends beyond the strict single-particle derivation; the formula is canonical, the framing is the speculative element. tractability_class: closed-form — single-formula evaluation given (m, T). dimensional_signature: [length]. References verified: Wikipedia thermal-de-Broglie article (WebFetch 2026-05-06) confirmed canonical λ_T = h/√(2π m k_B T) form. | Earlier history: status was 'invalid' (Wave N Tier C1, 2026-05-06) until Wave P-B R-B1 completed the pivot. Status_text was \"Phenomenological / Novel conjecture\" prior to reformulation.",
       "formalKey": "be-12",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ThermalDeBroglie.wavelength_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -100,6 +104,7 @@
         "physical"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Trace of Einstein equations (Jacobson 1995 thermodynamic interpretation): R = 4Λ - (8πG/c⁴)T, the scalar contraction of R_μν - (1/2)R g_μν + Λ g_μν = (8πG/c⁴)T_μν with g^μν. Encoded scalar trace replaces the tensor form for AST-tractability; the Jacobson information-thermodynamic origin framing is preserved as the bridge framing.",
       "formula_latex": "R = 4\\Lambda - \\frac{8\\pi G}{c^4} T",
       "source_part": "I",
@@ -130,6 +135,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-2]",
       "notes": "Encoded 2026-05-07 (Wave Y): Tier-5 AST encoding for the trace of Einstein equations R = 4Λ - (8πG/c⁴)T landed (the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)). The displayed formula_latex updated from the full tensor Einstein equation R_μν - (1/2)R g_μν + Λ g_μν = (8πG/c⁴)T_μν to its g^μν contraction R = 4Λ - (8πG/c⁴)T — the canonical scalar trace (MTW §17.4; Carroll §4.7). dimensional_signature null → '[L^-2]'. tractability_class lifted 'numerical-tractable' → 'closed-form' since the trace is a single algebraic relation given (Λ, T). Bracket: vacuum (Λ=0, T=0) → R=0; pure CC (T=0) → R=4Λ; matter dominance T = ρc² → R = 4Λ - 8πGρ/c² (textbook FRW). | Reformulated 2026-05-06 (Wave P-B R-B2, per Math iter-5 / Researcher iter-5 strategic pivot — complete bridges to canonical literature forms when one exists, rather than preserving R3-invalid). Replaced the Landauer-mis-attributed form R_μν − (1/2) R g_μν = (8πG/c⁴) [T_μν^matter + k_B T ln(2) I_μν] (which double-counted information into a separate stress-energy tensor I_μν, breaking diff-invariance and dimensionally non-closing) with the canonical **Jacobson 1995 thermodynamic derivation form**: standard Einstein field equations R_μν − (1/2) R g_μν + Λ g_μν = (8πG/c⁴) T_μν, with the *interpretation* that they arise as a macroscopic equation of state from the Clausius relation δQ = T dS applied to all local Rindler causal horizons through each spacetime point. The spurious k_B T ln(2) I_μν term is dropped (Jacobson has no such term). Status set to 'speculative' (not 'established') because the *information-thermodynamic origin framing* — committing to Jacobson over Verlinde or Padmanabhan — is a framework choice, not a derivation; the equation itself is canonical, the framing is the speculative element. | Earlier history: status was 'highly-speculative' then promoted 'invalid' (Wave N Tier C2, 2026-05-06) until Wave P-B R-B2 completed the pivot. The \"Landauer-Wheeler\" framing was a category error.",
       "formalKey": "be-13",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Einstein.trace_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -2,
         "M": 0,
@@ -151,6 +157,7 @@
         "physical"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "How bulk physics emerges from boundary quantum information",
       "formula_latex": "|\\psi_{\\text{bulk}}\\rangle = U_{\\text{HQECC}} \\sum_i \\alpha_i |\\text{code}_i\\rangle_{\\text{boundary}}",
       "source_part": "I",
@@ -163,6 +170,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[entropy]",
       "notes": "see source | status_text: Established (within AdS/CFT). The Ryu-Takayanagi formula S = Area(gamma)/(4 G_N hbar) is a well-established result in AdS/CFT holography (Ryu and Takayanagi 2006, arXiv:hep-th/0603001). Extensions to ...",
       "formalKey": "be-14",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.PlanckArea.area_law",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -184,6 +192,7 @@
         "emergent"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Hohenberg-Halperin Model A purely dissipative gradient flow for a non-conserved macroscopic order parameter, with Gaussian thermal noise satisfying the fluctuation-dissipation theorem.",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{\\partial \\phi_{\\text{macro}}(x,t)}{\\partial t} = -\\Gamma \\frac{\\delta H[\\phi_{\\text{macro}}]}{\\delta \\phi_{\\text{macro}}} + \\zeta(x,t), \\qquad \\langle \\zeta(x,t) \\zeta(x',t') \\rangle = 2 \\Gamma k_B T \\, \\delta(x-x') \\delta(t-t'), \\qquad H[\\phi] = \\int d^3x \\left[\\tfrac{1}{2}(\\nabla \\phi)^2 + V(\\phi)\\right]",
       "source_part": "I",
@@ -210,6 +219,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[length]",
       "notes": "Tier-5 AST encoding landed 2026-05-11 (Wave Z-D, the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)) — encodes the Kawasaki-Gunton late-stage coarsening scaling-law reduction L(t)² = Γ · t as an exact algebraic relation. The full Model A Langevin equation (gradient flow + FDT-balanced δ-correlated noise + functional H[φ]) cannot be encoded in the scalar AST grammar (requires Dirac δ, functional δ-derivative, functional integration primitives — none currently in scope). The squared-length form L² = Γt is chosen over L = √(Γt) because the AST's '^' operator requires dimensionless exponents; the root lives in the numerical evaluator (same pattern as BE-17 squared invariant). Inferred dim: Γ [L²/T] · t [T] = [area] = [L²]. The Kawasaki-Gunton z=2 dynamic critical exponent distinguishes Model A from Model B (z≈3, L~(Γt)^{1/3}) and Model H (fluid corrections). OpenAI o3 Wave Z-D consultation (2026-05-11) confirmed Kawasaki-Gunton over equipartition (generic stat-mech, mislabels Model A) and FDT-amplitude (loses all dynamics). Refs: Hohenberg-Halperin 1977 RMP 49:435 (canonical critical-dynamics); Kawasaki-Gunton 1976 Phys.Rev.A 13:2294 (original L~√Γt derivation); Allen-Cahn 1979 Acta Metall. 27:1085; Bray 1994 Adv.Phys. 43:357 (canonical coarsening review). Status remains 'speculative' — encoding does NOT promote the bridge framing. Honest-claude scope: late-stage asymptotic only (RG corrections at early times and near criticality not captured); the full Langevin dynamics remains outside the AST. | Reformulated 2026-05-06 (Wave P-D R-D1, per Math iter-5 / Researcher iter-5 strategic pivot — complete bridges to canonical literature forms when one exists, rather than preserving R3-invalid). Replaced the conflated form ∂O_macro/∂t = F[{O_micro}] + η∇²O_macro + ζ(∂²S/∂O²) (LHS an observable rate, RHS F[{O_micro}] an RG-flow functional evolving a coupling along scale k rather than along time t — disjoint physical objects) with the canonical Hohenberg-Halperin Model A purely-dissipative gradient flow ∂φ/∂t = -Γ δH/δφ + ζ. The noise satisfies the fluctuation-dissipation correlator ⟨ζ(x,t) ζ(x',t')⟩ = 2 Γ k_B T δ(x-x') δ(t-t'), enforcing detailed balance toward exp(-H/k_B T). The Landau-Ginzburg Hamiltonian H = ∫d³x [½(∇φ)² + V(φ)] with polynomial V(φ) is the canonical reference (φ⁴ being the simplest case). WebFetch on Wikipedia \"Critical phenomena\" confirmed the Hohenberg-Halperin nomenclature; the explicit Model A Langevin equation and the FDT noise correlator follow standard textbook references (Chaikin-Lubensky 1995 *Principles of Condensed Matter Physics* Ch. 8; Goldenfeld 1992). Status set to 'speculative' (not 'established') because Model A itself is canonical condensed-matter physics but the *bridge framing* — treating Model A as the UPT microscale ↔ emergent bridge, i.e., committing to a particular slow-mode coarse-graining — is the speculative element. The original \"Universal\" framing is dropped: there is no single emergence equation that covers all coarse-grainings; Model B (conserved density), Model C (order parameter coupled to a conserved density), and Model H (fluid) each require their own BE entry. tractability_class: numerical-tractable — Model A is a stochastic PDE with established numerical methods (forward-Euler / stochastic-Heun with appropriate noise discretization). dimensional_signature null because it depends on the order parameter's units (set by V(φ) and the choice of φ). Honest-claude flag: WebFetch on the Hohenberg-Halperin RMP itself returned 403 (paywall); WebFetch on Wikipedia \"Critical phenomena\" confirmed only the nomenclature with one numerical example, and WebFetch on stochastic-quantization / TDGL pages was insufficient. The explicit Langevin form and FDT correlator follow standard textbook references and are not a transcription from a single WebFetched source. | Earlier history: status was 'invalid' (Wave N Tier C3, 2026-05-06, per Phys iter-4 IMPORTANT) until this commit completed the pivot. The R2 gap-spec (2026-05-04) had recorded the three-path requirement (Hohenberg-Halperin / Wetterich / Mori-Zwanzig); the canonical-form reformulation here selects Hohenberg-Halperin Model A as the canonical baseline.",
       "formalKey": "be-15",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Coarsening.exponent_iff",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -231,6 +241,7 @@
         "emergent"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Landauer's principle: minimum thermodynamic energy per bit of information erased, k_B T ln 2. Canonical information-↔-thermodynamics bridge linking microscale information primitives to emergent thermodynamic energy costs.",
       "formula_latex": "E_{\\min} = k_B T \\ln 2",
       "source_part": "I",
@@ -268,6 +279,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[energy]",
       "notes": "Tier-5 AST encoding landed 2026-05-11 (Wave Z-E, the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)) — encodes Landauer's principle E_min = k_B · T · ln(2) as a typed algebraic relation. ln(2) is a concrete numerical constant (~0.693) encoded as a single DIMENSIONLESS symbol 'ln_2_constant' (no inner-argument lemma needed — unlike BE-25 / BE-45 where the log argument is a dimensionful ratio). Inferred RHS dim: [energy/temperature] · [temperature] · [1] = [energy] ✓. Numerical bracket: T = 300 K gives E_min ≈ 2.87e-21 J ≈ 18 meV per bit, matching the literature experimental scale (Bérut 2012). | Reformulated 2026-05-11 (Wave Z-E, per OpenAI o3 consultation, analogous to Wave P-D R-D2 BE-25 reformulation): replaced the algebraically-self-refuting form dS/dt = k_B·C(ρ)·∂I/∂t with Landauer's principle. The original ansatz suffered three orthogonal defects (per the disposition-locked known_issues): (1) circuit complexity C(ρ) was not independently defined — the equation was effectively a definition of complexity rather than a falsifiable relation; (2) sign convention conflated I and -S_vN; (3) the algebra combining I = Tr(ρ log ρ) = -S_vN with the master relation forced dS/dt · (1 + k_B C(ρ)) = 0, i.e., dS/dt = 0 for any C(ρ) > -1/k_B — the equation algebraically forbade entropy change, violating the Second Law. The reformulation drops C(ρ) entirely in favor of Landauer's principle, which addresses the same bridge label (microscale information ↔ emergent thermodynamics) via a canonical, experimentally-tested relation. Status set to 'speculative' (not 'established') because Landauer itself is canonical and well-tested but the *bridge framing* — treating Landauer's bound as THE UPT microscale-↔-emergent bridge — is the speculative element (other canonical bridges exist: Margolus-Levitin τ_min ≥ πℏ/(2E), Bremermann's limit, Bennett's reversible-computation bound). Honest-claude: Landauer is a *lower bound* on the *minimum* energy per bit erased, NOT a proportionality between *complexity* and *entropy-production rate* as the original ansatz claimed. The reformulation captures the spirit of the bridge label but not the original formula's intended structure. The Susskind complexity-volume / complexity-action conjectures (arXiv:1402.5674 / 1509.07876) that inspired the original ansatz are retained in references[] as historical context. | Earlier history: INVALID per disposition decision 2026-05-01 (Tier 3 audit, Bridge-Remediation-Plan.md R3): self-refuting algebraically, C(ρ) undefined. The invalid disposition correctly preserved the gap until the canonical reformulation became available; OpenAI o3 Wave-Z-E consultation (2026-05-11) confirmed Landauer's principle as the appropriate canonical replacement. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT §5 considered: audit recommended promotion to 'established' (Landauer canonical + experimentally verified). REJECTED — audit assesses the equation; this entry's 'speculative' status assesses the *framing* (Landauer-as-UPT-microscale-↔-emergent bridge), which remains the speculative element per Wave Z-E rationale. Distinction preserved. Analysis: docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-bridge-status-recalibration-analysis.md.",
       "formalKey": "be-16",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Landauer.erasure_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -289,6 +301,7 @@
         "field-B"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Einstein-Cartan field equations: standard Einstein equation plus algebraic torsion-spin coupling T^λ_μν = (8πG/c⁴) S^λ_μν (torsion sourced by spin angular momentum density)",
       "formula_latex": "R_{\\mu\\nu} - \\frac{1}{2} R g_{\\mu\\nu} + \\Lambda g_{\\mu\\nu} = \\frac{8\\pi G}{c^4} T_{\\mu\\nu}, \\qquad T^{\\lambda}{}_{\\mu\\nu} = \\frac{8\\pi G}{c^4} S^{\\lambda}{}_{\\mu\\nu}",
       "source_part": "I",
@@ -311,6 +324,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-2 M^2 T^-2]",
       "notes": "Wave Z-C 2026-05-07: Tier-5 AST encoding landed as a **squared-invariant scalar reduction** S²_spin = (c⁴/(8πG))² · T_λμν T^λμν (see the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)). The full EC system — Einstein equation R_μν − (1/2)R g_μν + Λ g_μν = (8πG/c⁴) T_μν plus algebraic torsion-spin coupling T^λ_μν = (8πG/c⁴) S^λ_μν — CANNOT be encoded in the scalar UPT AST grammar (operator-valued tensors: Ricci, Einstein, rank-3 torsion lie outside the symbol|op|integral|derivative grammar). OpenAI's scalar reduction inverts the algebraic torsion-spin equation and contracts: S^λ_μν = (c⁴/(8πG)) T^λ_μν, then S²_spin = (c⁴/(8πG))² · T_λμν T^λμν. The contraction T_λμν T^λμν is encoded as a single typed-stub symbol 'T_torsion_squared' (dim [T²·L⁻⁴]) — the AST does not expand the index sum — and the prefactor (c⁴/(8πG))² as a typed-stub 'c4_over_8piG_squared' (dim [M²·L²·T⁻⁴]). Inferred RHS dim [M²·L⁻²·T⁻²] = (angular-momentum-density)² matches the spin-density-squared scalar invariant. Honest-claude: this encoding captures ONE invariant of the EC torsion-spin coupling (squared norm), NOT the full field equations — the Einstein equation, metric, cosmological term, and rank-3 index structure remain absent. Status remains 'speculative' (encoding does NOT promote). dimensional_signature changed null → '[L^-2 M^2 T^-2]'. | Reformulated 2026-05-06 (Wave P-B R-B3, per Math iter-5 / Researcher iter-5 strategic pivot — complete bridges to canonical literature forms when one exists, rather than preserving R3-invalid). Replaced the conflated form R_μν^λρ = R̊_μν^λρ + K_μν^λρ + α(F_μν F^λρ − (1/4) g_μν F_αβ F^αβ) — which had three orthogonal structural defects (rank-4 vs rank-2 index mismatch on the Maxwell-stress-energy half; ℓ_EM = √(ℏc/e²) dimensionless in Gaussian, not a length in SI; non-canonical rank-4 contorsion K_μν^λρ vs the canonical rank-3 EC contorsion K^ρ_μν) — with the canonical **Einstein-Cartan field equations**: the Einstein equation R_μν − (1/2) R g_μν + Λ g_μν = (8πG/c⁴) T_μν together with the algebraic torsion-spin coupling T^λ_μν = (8πG/c⁴) S^λ_μν. Here T^λ_μν is the canonical rank-3 torsion tensor (antisymmetric in lower indices, sourced by the spin angular momentum density tensor S^λ_μν), and the spin-source nature of EC torsion is the canonical fact: torsion is **sourced by spin density, NOT by EM fields**. The original BE-17 framing as \"Electromagnetic-Gravitational Unification via Torsion\" conflated two separate ideas — EC theory with spin-source torsion vs. some unification scheme with EM-source torsion — and the EM-source claim is dropped here as a category error. Recovering an EM-gravity bridge would require a separate framework (Kaluza-Klein, non-minimal F²·R curvature coupling), each warranting its own BE entry. WebFetch on Trautman 2006 (arXiv:gr-qc/0606062) confirmed the abstract: \"Einstein-Cartan Theory ... allow[s] space-time to have torsion, in addition to curvature, and relating torsion to the density of intrinsic angular momentum.\" Status set to 'speculative' (not 'established') because the *bridge framing* — using EC theory as a cross-categorical bridge between fields A and B in UPT's catalog — is the speculative element; the equations are canonical. tractability_class: numerical-tractable — EC equations are coupled algebraic-PDE systems with known numerical methods (most non-degenerate spin-density configurations admit numerical solutions). Honest-claude flag: WebFetch on Trautman 2006 returned the abstract only, not the full tensor-equation derivation; commitment to the rank-3 T^λ_μν / S^λ_μν form follows the canonical Hehl-vonderHeyde-Kerlick-Nester 1976 RMP review convention. | Earlier history: status was 'speculative' then promoted 'invalid' (Wave N Tier C4, 2026-05-06) until this commit completed the pivot. The EM-source-for-torsion claim conflated EC theory with an unrelated unification ansatz; dropping it yields the canonical EC bridge.",
       "formalKey": "be-17",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.EinsteinCartan.inversion",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -2,
         "M": 2,
@@ -332,6 +346,7 @@
         "field-B"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Higgs-like dark-fermion mass generation: m_dark = g_dark · v_dark (Yukawa-coupling-times-VEV). SM analog: m_top ≈ y_t · v_EW with v_EW = 246 GeV/√2 = 174 GeV gives m_t ≈ 173 GeV. Encoded in natural units (mass-as-energy, ℏ=c=1).",
       "formula_latex": "m_{\\text{dark}} = g_{\\text{dark}} \\cdot v_{\\text{dark}}",
       "source_part": "I",
@@ -373,6 +388,7 @@
         "cosmological"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Loop quantum cosmology prediction",
       "formula_latex": "H^2 = \\frac{8\\pi G}{3} \\rho\\left(1 - \\frac{\\rho}{\\rho_{\\text{crit}}}\\right) + \\frac{\\Lambda}{3}, \\quad \\rho_{\\text{crit}} = \\frac{\\sqrt{3}}{32\\pi^2 \\gamma^3 \\ell_P^2} \\cdot \\frac{c^2}{G}",
       "source_part": "I",
@@ -398,6 +414,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[T^-2]",
       "notes": "see source | status_text: Speculative (LQC-inspired). Loop Quantum Cosmology bounce equations (Ashtekar, Bojowald) modify the Friedmann equation via a rho/rho_crit term. | Tier-5 AST encoding landed 2026-05-04 (branch tier-5/wave-1, the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)) — RHS encoded as scalar Friedmann + bounce factor; LHS is H². dimensional_signature [T^-2] is exactly format(infer(rhs)). Encoding is dimensional only; it does NOT promote status from speculative. | Reformulated 2026-05-05 (Wave I.B C1): replaced the dimensional-estimate rho_crit = 3c²/(8πGℓ_P²) (~6.2×10⁹⁵ kg/m³, off from canonical APS by ~3.4×) with the canonical Ashtekar-Pawlowski-Singh γ³-prefactored form rho_crit = (√3/(32π²γ³ℓ_P²))·(c²/G). With Meissner's γ≈0.2375 (gr-qc/0407052), this yields rho_crit ≈ 0.41·rho_Planck ≈ 2.1×10⁹⁶ kg/m³ as cited in the Ashtekar-Singh review (arXiv:1108.0893). The AST module BE-19 takes rho_crit as a free numerical input — no re-encoding needed; users supplying APS-canonical numerical values now match the spec literally rather than via a γ³ correction. The R0 known_issue was promoted into the formula and removed from known_issues. | Corrected on 2026-05-06 (Wave N Tier B, per Math IMP-1 + Researcher I-3 iter-4 CONV-1) — prefactor reconciliation: the Wave-I.B-C1 reformulation displayed √3/(16π²γ³) which evaluates to ~0.82·ρ_Planck — factor-of-2 discrepancy with the prose claim. Reconciled with literature consensus by changing the prefactor from 16 to 32, giving the canonical √3/(32π²γ³) form. The numerical claim ρ_crit ≈ 0.41·ρ_Planck is unchanged.",
       "formalKey": "be-19",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.QuantumBounce.dictionary",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -419,6 +436,7 @@
         "cosmological"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Observed cosmological-constant mass density: ρ_Λ = c²Λ/(8πG). With Λ ≈ 1.1×10⁻⁵² m⁻² (Planck 2018), ρ_Λ ≈ 5.4×10⁻²⁷ kg/m³ ≈ 70% of the present-day critical density.",
       "formula_latex": "\\rho_{\\Lambda} = \\frac{c^2 \\Lambda}{8\\pi G}",
       "source_part": "I",
@@ -461,6 +479,7 @@
         "condensed-matter"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Kovtun-Son-Starinets (KSS) 2005 universal lower bound on the shear-viscosity-to-entropy-density ratio: η/s ≥ ℏ/(4π k_B), saturated at η/s = ℏ/(4π k_B) ≈ 6.078×10⁻¹³ K·s in any quantum fluid with an Einstein-gravity holographic dual.",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{\\eta}{s} = \\frac{\\hbar}{4\\pi k_B}",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -490,6 +509,7 @@
         "unitSystem": "SI"
       },
       "formalKey": "be-21",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Kss.saturating",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -511,6 +531,7 @@
         "holography"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Connects topological phases to quantum error correction in gravity",
       "formula_latex": "S(R) = \\alpha L(R) - \\gamma + \\mathcal{O}(L^{-1})",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -545,6 +566,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "[Reformulated 2026-05-05, R2 → R5-leaning] Replaced the originally-stated three-term form (which had area-law-doubled and finite-T extension issues) with the canonical Kitaev-Preskill / Levin-Wen single-subsystem form S(R) = α L(R) − γ. AST-encoded; round-trips to dimensional_signature `[1]`. Status remains speculative because the QG-link framing of this bridge — using TEE as a probe of gravitational entanglement — is original to this catalog and not in either Kitaev-Preskill or Levin-Wen, even though the formula itself is established. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S3 unknown<->unknown naming applied (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S3): [quantum, holography]. Rationale (MEDIUM: TEE is a quantum-information signature; the gravity-link framing is holographic).",
       "formalKey": "be-22",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ToricCode.toric",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -566,6 +588,7 @@
         "holography"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Planckian dissipation in strange metals: linear-in-T resistivity from a SYK / holographic relaxation rate ℏ/τ ~ k_B T (Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev limit; Hartnoll-Hofman holographic strange-metal phenomenology).",
       "formula_latex": "\\rho(T) = \\rho_0 + \\frac{m^* k_B T}{n_e e^2 \\hbar} \\cdot \\alpha_{\\text{SYK}}",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -611,6 +634,7 @@
         "biological"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET): dipole-dipole transfer rate and transfer efficiency for donor-acceptor pairs separated by distance R, with Förster radius R_0 (typically 2-10 nm) at which η = 1/2.",
       "formula_latex": "\\eta_{\\text{transfer}} = \\frac{R_0^6}{R_0^6 + R^6} = \\frac{1}{1 + (R/R_0)^6}, \\quad k_{\\text{FRET}} = \\frac{1}{\\tau_D} \\left(\\frac{R_0}{R}\\right)^6",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -638,6 +662,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Encoded 2026-05-07 (Wave V): Tier-5 AST encoding for the FRET efficiency η = R_0⁶/(R_0⁶ + R⁶) landed (the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)). dimensional_signature null → '[1]' (round-trips cleanly). Both formulas (η dimensionless, k_FRET [T^-1]) remain in formula_latex; the AST encodes η since it is bound-respecting and the natural FRET observable. | Reformulated 2026-05-06 (Wave P-C R-C2, per Math iter-5 / Researcher iter-5 strategic pivot — complete bridges to canonical literature forms when one exists, rather than preserving R3-invalid). Replaced the bound-violating multiplicative form η_transfer = η_classical(1 + κ exp(-t/τ_coh) |⟨ψ_d|ψ_a⟩|²) (which admits η > 1 for κ ∈ [0.1, 0.3] and η_classical near 1) with the canonical Förster (1948) FRET formulas: dipole-dipole transfer rate k_FRET = (1/τ_D)(R_0/R)⁶ and bound-respecting transfer efficiency η = R_0⁶/(R_0⁶ + R⁶) = 1/(1 + (R/R_0)⁶) ∈ [0,1] by construction, where R is the donor-acceptor distance, R_0 is the Förster radius (typically 2-10 nm; the distance at which η = 0.5), and τ_D is the donor radiative lifetime in the absence of the acceptor. WebFetch on Wikipedia \"Förster resonance energy transfer\" confirmed the canonical formulas k_ET = (R_0/r)⁶/τ_D, R_0⁶ ∝ κ² Q_D J / n⁴ (with κ² dipole orientation, Q_D donor quantum yield, J spectral overlap, n refractive index), and E = 1/(1 + (r/R_0)⁶). Status set to 'speculative' (not 'established') because the *bridge framing* — quantum coherence in photosynthesis as a UPT quantum ↔ biological bridge — is conjectural even though FRET itself is canonical (the formula has held since 1948 and is the textbook reference for fluorescence-based distance measurements in the 1-10 nm range). Specifically, FRET is incoherent: it does not encode a \"quantum-coherent enhancement\" mechanism, and Cao 2020 et al. show that observed long-lived FMO oscillations are vibrational rather than electronic. tractability_class: closed-form — a single algebraic formula given (R, R_0, τ_D). dimensional_signature: dimensionless for η; [time^-1] for k_FRET. Honest-claude flag: WebFetch on the Wikipedia FRET article confirmed all key formulas; Cao 2020 contested-coherence consensus is documented in the references list and in the phenomenological-ansatz known_issue, so a future \"what if FMO is genuinely electronic-coherent\" reformulation would replace this entry with a HEOM or Lindblad form (both retained in references). The \"quantum enhancement factor\" κ is dropped — no canonical photosynthesis-FRET literature uses a multiplicative coherent-enhancement correction. | Earlier history: status was 'invalid' (Wave N Tier C5, 2026-05-06) until this commit completed the pivot. The R0 audit had recorded the three-path R2 framework-choice (FRET / HEOM / Lindblad); the canonical-form reformulation here selects FRET as the canonical baseline.",
       "formalKey": "be-24",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Fret.dictionary",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -659,6 +684,7 @@
         "consciousness"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Integrated Information Theory (IIT, Tononi) Φ_max: integrated information of a candidate substrate, computed as the irreducibility under the minimum information partition (MIP). Substrate-agnostic measure of consciousness; consistent with the Tegmark-decoherence rebuttal of Penrose-Hameroff Orch-OR (IIT makes no claim about quantum coherence).",
       "formula_latex": "\\Phi_{\\max}(S) = \\min_{\\theta \\in \\text{partitions}(S)} \\left[ ii(s, \\tilde{s}) - ii_{\\theta}(s, \\tilde{s}) \\right], \\qquad ii(s, \\tilde{s}) = p(\\tilde{s} \\mid s) \\log_2 \\frac{p(\\tilde{s} \\mid s)}{p(\\tilde{s})}",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -705,6 +731,7 @@
         "biological"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Proton tunneling in base pair tautomerization (WKB form canonical, biological-relevance bridge framing speculative)",
       "formula_latex": "\\Gamma_{\\text{mutation}} = \\nu_0 \\exp\\left(-\\frac{2}{\\hbar}\\int_{x_1}^{x_2}\\sqrt{2m(V(x)-E)} \\, dx\\right) \\cdot f(T,\\text{pH}, \\text{EM})",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -746,6 +773,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Cugliandolo-Kurchan effective temperature in non-equilibrium / active-matter systems: T_eff = T·(1 + Σ_active/(k_B T)). Scalar leading-order linearization of the full FDT-violation framework. T_eff = T at passive equilibrium (Σ_active = 0); grows linearly with active-noise contribution.",
       "formula_latex": "T_{\\text{eff}} = T \\cdot \\left(1 + \\frac{\\Sigma_{\\text{active}}}{k_B T}\\right)",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -768,6 +796,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[temperature]",
       "notes": "Encoded 2026-05-07 (Wave Y): Tier-5 AST encoding for the Cugliandolo-Kurchan effective-temperature scalar T_eff = T·(1 + Σ_active/(k_B T)) landed (the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)). dimensional_signature null → '[temperature]'. T_eff = T at passive equilibrium (Σ_active = 0); grows linearly with active-noise amplitude. tractability_class lifted 'numerical-tractable' → 'closed-form'. | Reformulated 2026-05-07 (Wave Y, per the strategic pattern of replacing operator-valued bridge content with canonical scalar reductions). Replaced the operator-valued FDT-violation correlator form χ(ω) = (1/(k_BT_eff(ω))) ∫dt e^iωt ⟨δF(t)δx(0)⟩ + Σ_active(ω) with the canonical Cugliandolo-Kurchan scalar effective-temperature relation T_eff = T·(1 + Σ_active/(k_B T)). The full FDT-violation correlator structure is preserved as the bridge framing; the scalar T_eff is the encodable bridge content. Status remains 'speculative' — the bridge framing (effective temperature as a UPT non-equilibrium-statmech bridge) is the speculative element. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S3 unknown<->unknown naming applied (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S3): [mesoscopic, classical]. Rationale (MEDIUM: active matter is mesoscopic; FDT violation is observed at classical).",
       "formalKey": "be-27",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.EffectiveTemperature.sum_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -789,6 +818,7 @@
         "unknown"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Why nature chooses specific non-equilibrium steady states",
       "formula_latex": "\\delta \\int \\left(\\frac{dS}{dt} - \\lambda \\sum_i J_i X_i - \\mu(\\nabla \\cdot \\mathbf{v})\\right) dt = 0",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -804,6 +834,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^2 M T^-3 Theta^-1]",
       "notes": "Tier-5 AST encoding landed 2026-05-11 (Wave Z-G, the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)) — encodes σ = Σᵢ Jᵢ Xᵢ as a typed-stub scalar with dim [entropy/time] = [L² M T⁻³ Θ⁻¹] = [W/K]. The discrete index sum over species (heat-flux/∇T, particle-flux/∇μ, charge-current/electric-field, etc.) is collapsed into a single typed-stub symbol 'force_flux_product' — the UPT AST has no discrete-index sum primitive, so the multi-species content is absorbed into the stub. Same idiom as BE-17 'T_torsion_squared' (typed-stub for tensor contraction) and BE-46 'exp_factor' (typed-stub for transcendental). Inferred RHS dim ✓. Numerical evaluator enforces Second-Law σ ≥ 0 (RangeError on negative σ). | Reformulated 2026-05-11 (Wave Z-G, **user-confirmed design choice after surfacing the relabeling concern via AskUserQuestion**, per OpenAI o3 consultation): replaced the Dewar 2003/2005 variational formulation δ ∫[dS/dt - λ Σ J·X - μ(∇·v)]dt = 0 (which requires variational-δ, Lagrange-multiplier, and discrete-sum grammar primitives the UPT AST does not have) with the Onsager linear-response entropy-production scalar σ = Σ J·X. **IMPORTANT honest-claude scope: this reformulation does NOT capture MEPP's variational maximization claim.** Onsager linear-response is canonical, uncontested physics that defines the entropy production rate but says nothing about NESS selection. MEPP claims that \"of all admissible NESS, nature selects the one maximizing σ subject to constraints\" — that claim is the actual MEPP content and is NOT preserved by the encoded form. The reformulation is closer to a RENAMING of BE-28 (MEPP → Onsager entropy production) than to the BE-25 / BE-16 / BE-37 reformulations which preserved their bridge labels. The user explicitly chose this reformulation in Wave Z-G after the relabeling concern was surfaced, accepting the trade-off: 40/40 active bridge encodings at the cost of MEPP's variational semantic content. The reformulation is documented as such; future readers should understand the encoding answers \"what is the entropy production rate?\" but NOT \"why does nature select this rate?\" — the latter remains an open research question (Dewar 2003 derivation, Grinstein-Linsker 2007 counterexamples, Prigogine minimum-EP-principle conflict in the linear regime). Onsager linear-response is **already implicitly used** by BE-21 (KSS η/s), BE-23 (SYK resistivity), and BE-29 (Jarzynski); BE-28's distinguishing role is to encode the σ scalar itself, not a derived transport coefficient or fluctuation theorem. Status remains 'speculative' (NOT lifted to 'established') because the bridge framing — treating Onsager σ as THE UPT NESS-selection bridge — is the speculative element, AND the relabeling concern (Onsager ≠ MEPP) is itself documented as a known scope-limitation. tractability_class lifted 'formally-divergent' → 'closed-form'. | Earlier history: status_text was \"Contested principle. Maximum Entropy Production (MEPP) is a proposed but contested principle in non-equilibrium thermodynamics (Dewar 2005; rebutted by Grinstein and Linsker 2007). It conflicts with Prigogine's minimum-entropy-production-principle for near-equilibrium linear systems.\" dimensional_signature null because MEPP-as-variational-principle has no single scalar dim. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S3 unknown<->unknown classification applied (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S3): NOT-A-BRIDGE. HIGH NOT-A-BRIDGE: single-regime non-equilibrium principle (Onsager); audit-S3 bridge-incoherence finding applies. The bridges array remains [unknown, unknown] as the structural marker for not actually a regime-spanning bridge. Future v0.8+ restructuring may move this entry to a separate LAW_EQUATIONS registry.",
       "formalKey": "be-28",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.EntropyProduction.nonneg",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -825,6 +856,7 @@
         "unknown"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Jarzynski 1997 non-equilibrium free-energy equality: ΔF = -k_B T ln⟨exp(-W/(k_B T))⟩, exact for any work protocol connecting two equilibrium states at temperature T. The original BE-29 framing (extending to gravitational work in curved spacetime) is preserved as the speculative bridge element documented in known_issues.",
       "formula_latex": "\\Delta F = -k_B T \\ln \\langle \\exp(-W / (k_B T)) \\rangle",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -848,6 +880,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[energy]",
       "notes": "Encoded 2026-05-07 (Wave Y): Tier-5 AST encoding for the canonical Jarzynski free-energy equality ΔF = -k_B T ln⟨exp(-W/(k_B T))⟩ landed (the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)). Both LHS and RHS infer to [energy]; the AST has no exp / ln primitives, so ⟨exp(-βW)⟩ is encoded as a dimensionless symbol stub and the exp argument β·W = W/(k_B T) is exposed as a separate ExprNode (BE29_BETAW_ARG) for direct dimensionlessness verification — same pattern as BE-26, BE-41, BE-45. Numerical evaluator estimates ⟨exp(-βW)⟩ from a sample of work values; bracket-checks include the equilibrium identity ΔF = W_rev when all samples are at the reversible work value. dimensional_signature was orphan '[energy]' (Wave R0 audit pin); now backed by an AST module so removed from ORPHAN_DIMENSIONAL_SIGNATURES. | Reformulated 2026-05-07 (Wave Y, per the strategic pattern of replacing operator-valued bridge content with canonical scalar reductions). Replaced the curved-spacetime extension ⟨exp(-βW)⟩ = exp(-βΔF) · exp(-(β/2c⁴) ∫T^μν δg_μν √(-g) d⁴x) (which had the operator-valued ∫T^μν δg_μν gravity-correction integral as the AST-unencodable element) with the pure Jarzynski 1997 equality. The gravitational-correction term is dropped as the speculative bridge framing element; the bridge framing (extending Jarzynski to gravitational work, the original BE-29 motivation) is documented as the reformulation candidate in known_issues. Status remains 'speculative' because the gravity-extension framing is the speculative element. | Earlier history: 2026-05-01 R1 audit replaced ill-defined 'g_μν dT^μν' with the canonical Hilbert action variation form (MTW §21.3 Eq. 21.51; Wald §E.1 Eq. E.1.14). Wave J Tier D4 documented the factorization-assumption issue. Wave L Tier I2 documented the Hilbert-action specifics. The Wave Y reformulation supersedes the gravity-extension form by encoding the pure Jarzynski equality directly. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT §5 considered: audit recommended promotion to 'established' (Jarzynski canonical 1997, experimentally verified). REJECTED — same equation-vs-framing distinction as BE-16; 'speculative' assesses the gravity-extension framing element, not the underlying Jarzynski equality. Distinction preserved. Analysis: docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-bridge-status-recalibration-analysis.md. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S3 unknown<->unknown classification applied (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S3): NOT-A-BRIDGE. HIGH NOT-A-BRIDGE: single-regime statistical mechanics result (Jarzynski equality). The bridges array remains [unknown, unknown] as the structural marker for not actually a regime-spanning bridge. Future v0.8+ restructuring may move this entry to a separate LAW_EQUATIONS registry.",
       "formalKey": "be-29",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Jarzynski.jensen_work",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -870,6 +903,7 @@
         "gravity"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Faulkner-Lewkowycz-Maldacena 2013 first-law-of-entanglement-entropy linear-response identity δS_EE(R) = δ⟨H_R⟩, where H_R is the modular Hamiltonian on region R. Both sides dimensionless (in nats). Tautological at the linear-response level; encoded as the canonical scalar bridge content with full operator structure preserved as bridge framing.",
       "formula_latex": "\\delta S_{\\text{EE}}(R) = \\delta \\langle H_R \\rangle",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -893,6 +927,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Encoded 2026-05-07 (Wave Y): Tier-5 AST encoding for the FLM first-law-of-entanglement-entropy identity δS_EE(R) = δ⟨H_R⟩ landed (the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)). dimensional_signature null → '[1]' (both sides dimensionless in nats convention). The identity is tautological at the linear-response level (δS_EE / δ⟨H_R⟩ = 1 by construction); the encoding pins the dimensional structure and the scalar relation. As a non-trivial secondary cross-check, the Bekenstein universal entropy bound S_EE ≤ 2π R E / (ℏc) is exposed via a separate evaluator evaluateBekensteinBound for sanity-checking entanglement-entropy magnitudes. tractability_class lifted 'numerical-tractable' → 'closed-form' (the FLM identity is a single dimensionless scalar relation; the Bekenstein bound is single-formula evaluable). | Reformulated 2026-05-06 (Wave P-A R-A1, per Math iter-5 strategic pivot). Replaced the structurally ill-formed η_μν + κ Σ_ij ⟨x|Tr_j(ρ_{ij} log ρ_{ij})|x⟩ form (LHS-RHS rank/type mismatch, non-normalizable |x⟩, dimensionally wrong κ) with the canonical first-law-of-entanglement / FLM linear-response form: δS_EE(R) = δ⟨H_R⟩, where H_R is the modular Hamiltonian of the reduced density matrix on region R. Reference verified via WebFetch on Blanco-Casini-Hung-Myers 2013 (arXiv:1305.3182) which states the form explicitly: \"ΔS = ΔH for the first order variation of the entanglement entropy ΔS and the expectation value of the modular Hamiltonian ΔH\". FLM 2013 (arXiv:1307.2892) uses this as the linear-response input to bulk one-loop corrections in AdS/CFT. Status set to 'speculative' (not 'established') because the QG-emergence framing — using this linear-response identity as the basis for ER=EPR-style entanglement-geometry equivalence outside the strict AdS/CFT regime — remains conjectural; the formula itself is canonical, the framing is the speculative element. | Earlier history: original ill-formed form sourced from earlier draft; R3-invalid disposition 2026-05-05 (Wave J Tier B2) noted FLM as canonical replacement. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S3 unknown<->unknown naming applied (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S3): [information, gravity]. Rationale (HIGH: first-law of entanglement entropy <-> Einstein equations is the canonical entanglement-gravity bridge).",
       "formalKey": "be-30",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Entanglement.first_variation",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -914,6 +949,7 @@
         "cosmological"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Discrete to continuous spacetime transition",
       "formula_latex": "R(p) = \\frac{4}{\\sqrt{6}} \\ell_P^{-2} \\left[1 - N_0(p) + 9 N_1(p) - 16 N_2(p) + 8 N_3(p)\\right] \\quad (d=4)",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -956,6 +992,7 @@
         "unknown"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "How physics transforms between quantum reference frames",
       "formula_latex": "|\\psi\\rangle_B = \\int dg , U(g) |\\psi\\rangle_A \\otimes |g\\rangle_{\\text{frame}}",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -977,6 +1014,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Encoded 2026-05-07 (Wave Z): Tier-5 AST encoding for the QRF Born-rule overlap probability landed (the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)). dimensional_signature null → '[1]' (DIMENSIONLESS Born-rule probability). The original operator-valued |ψ⟩_B = ∫dg U(g)|ψ⟩_A ⊗ |g⟩_frame form is preserved in formula_latex; the AST encodes OpenAI's scalar reduction P_overlap = |⟨ψ_A|U(g)|ψ_B⟩|² = c² + s² for a single (implicit) group element g. Honest-claude flags: ∫dg group-average deferred (would need committed group + Haar regulator); operator U(g) collapsed to symbolic real/imag matrix-element components c, s; Born-rule guard catches |c|²+|s|² > 1+ε. tractability lifted 'formally-divergent' → 'closed-form' for the encoded scalar (the original integral form remains formally-divergent for non-compact groups; that is documented in known_issues). Gemini-Pro-confirmed second-opinion 2026-05-07: \"excellent and physically meaningful reduction\", AST-grammar-compliant. | see source | status_text: Active research. Quantum Reference Frames (QRF) formalism -- where reference frames are themselves quantum systems that can be in superposition -- is a legitimate active research area (Giacomini, Cast... | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S3 unknown<->unknown classification applied (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S3): NOT-A-BRIDGE. LOW NOT-A-BRIDGE: intra-quantum gauge-redundancy result; does not span two regimes. The bridges array remains [unknown, unknown] as the structural marker for not actually a regime-spanning bridge. Future v0.8+ restructuring may move this entry to a separate LAW_EQUATIONS registry.",
       "formalKey": "be-32",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.BornOverlap.modulus_sq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -998,6 +1036,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Relates d-dimensional quantum to (d+z)-dimensional classical transitions via Hertz-Millis canonical scaling",
       "formula_latex": "\\xi_{\\text{quantum}}(T) \\sim \\xi_0 \\left(\\frac{T}{T_0}\\right)^{-1/z}, \\quad (z=1)",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1025,6 +1064,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[length]",
       "notes": "[Exponent corrected 2026-05-20, bridge physics audit] The finite-T correlation-length exponent was changed from -ν/z (pinned -0.71) to -1/z (pinned -1 for z=1). At a quantum critical point ξ ~ T^{-1/z}: z alone sets the temperature dependence, ν governs the separate T=0 tuning-parameter axis. This resolves the prior honest-claude flag below — the -ν/z vs -1/z convention is now confirmed (-1/z) by a literature check against cond-mat/0503298 (\"ξ ~ (T/Tc)^{-1/z}\") and the QCP-scaling reviews. AST pin, evaluator, formula_latex, and references all updated; numerical evaluator no longer depends on ν (the 'nu' input is retained for API stability only). A second known_issue now flags that the \"Hertz-Millis / 3D Heisenberg\" universality-class label is itself questionable (canonical itinerant Hertz-Millis is mean-field, z=2/3). | Encoded 2026-05-07 (Wave V): Tier-5 AST encoding for Hertz-Millis correlation length landed (the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)). dimensional_signature null → '[length]'. AST exponent originally pinned -0.71 (superseded by the 2026-05-20 correction above); numerical evaluator remains universality-class-agnostic. | Reformulated 2026-05-06 (Wave P-A R-A2, per Math iter-5 / Researcher iter-5 strategic pivot — complete bridges to canonical literature forms when one exists, rather than preserving R3-invalid). Replaced the broken ansatz ξ_quantum(T) = ξ_classical / √(1 + (E_0/k_B T)²) — which gave the wrong T → 0 limit (ξ → 0 instead of the required QCP divergence) and lacked the dynamic exponent z — with the canonical Hertz-Millis scaling form ξ ~ T^{-ν/z}, pinned to **3D Heisenberg universality class (z = 1, ν ≈ 0.71)** as the canonical reference case. The 3D Heisenberg pin is a deliberate framework commitment: it is the simplest non-trivial QCP class with established literature exponents (ν ≈ 0.71 from ε-expansion, Monte Carlo, and conformal-bootstrap consensus; z = 1 from Lorentz invariance of the underlying field theory). Alternative universality classes (3D Ising z=1 ν≈0.63; 3D XY z=1 ν≈0.67; fermionic Hertz-Millis-Moriya z=2-3) are deferred to future bridge expansions and would each warrant their own BE entry. tractability_class: numerical-tractable — concrete (ν, z) values are computable in Monte Carlo and bootstrap. Honest-claude flag: WebFetch on Sachdev review and Wikipedia did not return the canonical T^{-ν/z} form directly (abstract-only / non-canonical pages); commitment to ξ ~ T^{-ν/z} (rather than the simpler ξ ~ T^{-1/z}) follows the textbook convention used by Sondhi et al. 1997 RMP and Sachdev 2011, but the precise convention (ν vs ν=1 special case) was not WebFetch-confirmed in this commit. | Earlier history: status was 'invalid' (Wave N Tier C6, 2026-05-06) until this commit completed the pivot. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S3 unknown<->unknown naming applied (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S3): [quantum, classical]. Rationale (HIGH: self-explanatory from the name (Hertz-Millis QCP)).",
       "formalKey": "be-33",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.QuantumCritical.thermal_scaling",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -1046,6 +1086,7 @@
         "cosmological"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Defect formation during cosmological phase transitions",
       "formula_latex": "n_{\\text{defect}} = \\frac{1}{a^d}\\left(\\frac{\\tau_Q}{\\tau_0}\\right)^{-\\frac{d\\nu}{1+z\\nu}} \\cdot \\exp\\left(-\\frac{m_{\\text{defect}} c^2}{k_B T_{\\text{reh}}}\\right)",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1066,6 +1107,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "see source | status_text: Established extension. The Kibble-Zurek defect density n ~ (tau_Q/tau_0)^(-d nu / (1 + z nu)) is established (Kibble 1976; Zurek 1985). The added exp(-m_defect c^2 / (k_B T_reh)) suppression for curve... | Tier-5 AST encoding landed 2026-05-04 (branch tier-5/wave-1, the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)) — RHS encoded as (τ_Q/τ_0)^(-1/2) · exp_factor for the canonical (d=ν=z=1) case; the dimensional answer is independent of the chosen exponent. The exp argument m c² / (k_B T_reh) is exposed as KIBBLE_ZUREK_EXP_ARG and verified dimensionless. dimensional_signature [1] is exactly format(infer(rhs)). LHS n_defect is dimensionless (scaling ratio, no length scale in the formula). | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S3 unknown<->unknown naming applied (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S3): [quantum, cosmological]. Rationale (MEDIUM: cosmological-KZM = quantum-fluctuation defects in cosmological-scale spacetime). | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S4 resolution (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S2): the multiplicative Boltzmann factor exp(-m c^2/k_B T_reh) is NOT part of the canonical kinematic KZM (Eve confirmed at high confidence; standard freeze-out derivation has no thermal-suppression term). The catalog inclusion is a non-canonical extension drawn from cosmological-KZM literature on massive defects (cosmic strings, GUT monopoles -- Linde 1990 Phys. Lett. B 246 353, and earlier GUT-monopole papers) where core-energy thresholds during reheating can motivate a suppression factor. Multiplicative combination with the kinematic n_KZ is unconventional; additive or sequential composition may be more standard. Status remains speculative specifically to flag this combination as the speculative element; the underlying kinematic KZM is canonical.",
       "formalKey": "be-34",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.KibbleZurek.exponent",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -1087,6 +1129,7 @@
         "unknown"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Constrains possible conformal field theories",
       "formula_latex": "\\langle O_1(x_1) O_2(x_2) O_3(x_3) O_4(x_4) \\rangle = \\sum_{\\Delta,\\ell} C_{12}^O C_{34}^O g_{\\Delta,\\ell}(u,v)",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1119,6 +1162,7 @@
         }
       ],
       "formalKey": "be-35",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Crossing.antisymmetry",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -1140,6 +1184,7 @@
         "dark-sector"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "GW170817 graviton-speed bound: |c_GW − c|/c ≤ 10⁻¹⁵ (Abbott et al. 2017 ApJ Lett. 848:L13; ~1.7s arrival difference over ~40 Mpc gives the constraint). Strongly constrains TeVeS-class theories that generically predict c_GW ≠ c. Encoded scalar is the dimensionless ratio (c_GW − c)/c.",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{|c_{\\text{GW}} - c|}{c} \\leq 10^{-15}",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1192,6 +1237,7 @@
         "gravity"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Shapiro gravitational time delay: coordinate-time delay of light passing near a massive body, Δt = (2GM/c³)·ln(R_far/R_near). The canonical operationally-meaningful \"effective-c\" effect that survives the Ellis-Uzan 2005 critique of vacuum c(t,x)-variation.",
       "formula_latex": "\\Delta t = \\frac{2 G M}{c^3} \\ln\\!\\left(\\frac{R_{\\text{far}}}{R_{\\text{near}}}\\right)",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1257,6 +1303,7 @@
         }
       },
       "formalKey": "be-37",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Shapiro.radial_integral",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -1278,6 +1325,7 @@
         "gravity"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Verlinde's emergent gravity with dark matter effects",
       "formula_latex": "F = F_N \\cdot \\nu(z), \\quad z = \\frac{F_N}{m a_0}, \\quad \\nu(z) = \\sqrt{\\frac{1 + \\sqrt{1 + 4/z^2}}{2}}",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1301,6 +1349,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[force]",
       "notes": "status_text: Speculative. Based on Verlinde (arXiv:1001.0785). Contested; not accepted as mainstream physics. | Reformulated 2026-05-05 (Wave I.B C4, per Physicist I12 paper review): replaced the broken F_N[1 + α√(a_0/a) tanh(√(a/a_0))] interpolation — which fails the deep-MOND limit (gives F → F_N(1+α) ~ Newtonian instead of the required F → √(m · F_N · a_0) as a → 0) — with the canonical Milgrom 1983 MOND interpolation μ(x) = x/√(1+x²), x = a/a_0. This recovers F → F_N for a >> a_0 (Newtonian) and F → √(m · F_N · a_0) for a << a_0 (deep-MOND) by construction. The R2 gap-spec block proposing three replacement candidates is collapsed into this single canonical choice; the Verlinde 2016 mass-correction variant and TeVeS relativistic completion are documented in references[] for future work. The known_issue is now phenomenological-ansatz (MOND fits rotation curves but lacks first-principles derivation), not a sign-defect. **Note:** BE-38 shares the MOND scale a_0 with BE-36; reformulation of either should sanity-check consistency. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S3 unknown<->unknown naming applied (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S3): [information, gravity]. Rationale (HIGH: entropic gravity (Verlinde) maps information -> gravity).",
       "formalKey": "be-38",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Mond.tendsto_nu_limits",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 1,
@@ -1322,6 +1371,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "UV-complete theory via non-Gaussian fixed point",
       "formula_latex": "\\begin{align}\n\\beta_g &= 2g + Ag^2 + Bg^3 - Cg^2\\lambda + \\mathcal{O}(g^4) \\\\\n\\beta_\\lambda &= -2\\lambda + D\\lambda^2 - Eg\\lambda - Fg^2 + \\mathcal{O}(\\lambda^3, g^3)\n\\end{align}",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1375,6 +1425,7 @@
         "unknown"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Higgs as pseudo-Goldstone boson",
       "formula_latex": "V(h) = -\\alpha f^4 \\sin^2\\left(\\frac{h}{f}\\right) + \\beta f^4\\left[\\sin^4\\left(\\frac{h}{f}\\right) - \\sin^2\\left(\\frac{h}{f}\\right)\\cos^2\\left(\\frac{h}{f}\\right)\\right]",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1389,6 +1440,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^8 M^4 T^-8]",
       "notes": "Encoded 2026-05-07 (Wave V): Tier-5 AST encoding for the SILH composite-Higgs potential V(h) = -α f⁴ sin²(h/f) + β f⁴ [sin⁴(h/f) - sin²(h/f) cos²(h/f)] landed (the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)). dimensional_signature null → '[L^8 M^4 T^-8]' (= [energy^4]; matches BE-18). The four trig combinations are encoded as dimensionless symbol stubs (the AST has no transcendental primitives); h/f dimensionlessness is verified via lemma BE40_HIGGS_DIMLESS_ARG. Numerical evaluator works in natural units (f, h dimensionless TeV-scale), the standard particle-physics convention. | Corrected on 2026-05-05 (Wave J Tier C5, per Phys iter-2 paper review): the first term coefficient was -α f² which made the term carry energy-dimension [E]² while the second term β f⁴[...] carries [E]⁴, giving a dimensionally inhomogeneous potential. Standard composite-Higgs effective potentials (Kaplan-Georgi 1984; Giudice-Grojean-Pomarol-Rattazzi 2007) are V(h) = α f⁴ sin² + β f⁴ sin⁴ with α, β dimensionless Wilson coefficients and the overall f⁴ scale set by the coset Goldstone-boson decay constant. Replaced f² with f⁴ for dimensional consistency. status_text: Established form (after correction). The pseudo-Goldstone Higgs construction is the canonical SO(5)/SO(4) composite-Higgs pattern; the catalog framing of treating it as a bridge between Standard-Model and BSM physics is original to UPT but the potential itself is mainstream. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT §5 considered: audit recommended demotion to 'speculative' (BSM research program). KEPT as 'established' — the SO(5)/SO(4) coset structure is canonical group theory (current test-pinned rationale). However, the Composite-Higgs scenario itself IS BSM research; consumers reading the 'established' status should read this as endorsing the canonical math, not endorsing Composite Higgs as a real BSM phenomenon. Analysis: docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-bridge-status-recalibration-analysis.md. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S3 unknown<->unknown classification applied (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S3): NOT-A-BRIDGE. HIGH NOT-A-BRIDGE: single-regime BSM field theory; SO(5)/SO(4) coset is internal. The bridges array remains [unknown, unknown] as the structural marker for not actually a regime-spanning bridge. Future v0.8+ restructuring may move this entry to a separate LAW_EQUATIONS registry.",
       "formalKey": "be-40",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.CompositeHiggs.scale_free",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 8,
         "M": 4,
@@ -1410,6 +1462,7 @@
         "cosmological"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Constraints on effective field theories from quantum gravity",
       "formula_latex": "m(\\phi) = m_0 \\exp\\left(-\\alpha\\frac{|\\phi-\\phi_0|}{M_P}\\right)",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1448,6 +1501,7 @@
         "quantum"
       ],
       "status": "highly-speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Hawking 1975 black-hole temperature: T_H = ℏc³/(8π G M k_B). The temperature scale at which the firewall / information paradox lives. Solar-mass BH (M ≈ 2×10³⁰ kg) gives T_H ≈ 6×10⁻⁸ K; a Planck-mass BH gives T_H ≈ T_Planck/(8π).",
       "formula_latex": "T_H = \\frac{\\hbar c^3}{8\\pi G M k_B}",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1472,6 +1526,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[temperature]",
       "notes": "Encoded 2026-05-07 (Wave Y): Tier-5 AST encoding for the canonical Hawking temperature T_H = ℏc³/(8π G M k_B) landed (the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)). dimensional_signature null → '[temperature]' (round-trips cleanly: [ℏc³] = M L⁵ T⁻⁴, [G M k_B] = M L⁵ T⁻⁴ Θ⁻¹, ratio = Θ ✓). Numerical bracket: solar-mass BH (M = 1.989×10³⁰ kg) → T_H ≈ 6.17×10⁻⁸ K (textbook Hawking temperature for stellar-mass BH per Wald §14.3.7). | Reformulated 2026-05-07 (Wave Y, per the strategic pattern of replacing operator-valued / quantum-state bridge content with canonical scalar reductions). Replaced the firewall complement-principle quantum-state superposition |ψ⟩ = α|smooth⟩ + β|firewall⟩ (an AST-unencodable Hilbert-space decomposition without operational predictive content unless |α|² and |β|² were independently specified) with the canonical Hawking temperature T_H = ℏc³/(8π G M k_B) — the temperature scale at which the firewall paradox lives. The bridge framing (firewall paradox / information paradox resolutions, the original BE-42 catalog motivation) is preserved as the speculative element documented in known_issues. Status remains 'highly-speculative' because the firewall-resolution bridge framing — using T_H as the bridge between AMPS / ER=EPR / complementarity / soft-hair / Page-curve resolutions — is the highly-speculative element; T_H itself is canonical Hawking. | Earlier history: BE-42 was originally the firewall complement principle; AMPS 2013 (arXiv:1207.3123), Maldacena-Susskind 2013 ER=EPR (arXiv:1306.0533), Harlow 2016 review (arXiv:1409.1231), Penington 2020 entanglement-wedge (arXiv:1905.08255) all concern dynamics at the Hawking-temperature scale. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S3 unknown<->unknown classification applied (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S3): NOT-A-BRIDGE. HIGH NOT-A-BRIDGE: audit-S3 confirmed canonical physics mis-filed; single quantum-gravity regime. The bridges array remains [unknown, unknown] as the structural marker for not actually a regime-spanning bridge. Future v0.8+ restructuring may move this entry to a separate LAW_EQUATIONS registry.",
       "formalKey": "be-42",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.HawkingUnruh.dictionary",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -1493,6 +1548,7 @@
         "gravity"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Entanglement-wormhole equivalence: entanglement entropy bounded by wormhole cross-section area (ER=EPR canonical form)",
       "formula_latex": "S_{\\text{entanglement}} \\sim \\frac{A_{\\text{wormhole}}}{4 \\ell_P^2}",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1516,6 +1572,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[entropy]",
       "notes": "Encoded 2026-05-07 (Wave V): Tier-5 AST encoding for the ER=EPR wormhole-entropy bound landed (the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)). dimensional_signature null → '[entropy]'; the AST encodes the SI form S = k_B · A_wormhole / (4 ℓ_P²), which is equivalent to BE-14's k_B c³ A/(4 G ℏ) Ryu-Takayanagi form (since ℓ_P² = ℏG/c³). Mirrors BE-14's [entropy] convention exactly. | Reformulated 2026-05-06 (Wave P-A R-A3, per Math iter-5 / Researcher iter-5 strategic pivot — complete bridges to canonical literature forms when one exists, rather than preserving R3-invalid). Replaced the broken dℓ_wormhole/dt = -γ S_entanglement + δ ∫ T_μν u^μ u^ν dV form (sign-backwards + dimensional malformedness — entropy + stress-energy-integral cannot be combined into a length/time without unphysical coefficient roles for γ and δ) with the canonical ER=EPR wormhole-entropy-bound form: S_entanglement ~ A_wormhole / (4 ℓ_P²). This is the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy bound (Bekenstein 1973 PRD 7:2333; Hawking 1975 CMP 43:199) applied to the minimal cross-section of an Einstein-Rosen bridge — the canonical Maldacena-Susskind 2013 (arXiv:1306.0533) statement of the entanglement-wormhole equivalence. WebFetch on arXiv:1306.0533 returned abstract only confirming the ER=EPR equivalence statement: \"two distant black holes are connected through the interior via a wormhole, or Einstein-Rosen bridge...interpreted as maximally entangled states of two black holes that form a complex EPR pair.\" Status: 'speculative' (not 'established') because the ER=EPR conjecture itself remains conjectural outside the strict eternal-black-hole / thermofield-double AdS/CFT regime; the bound formula is canonical Bekenstein-Hawking, the framing is the speculative element. tractability_class: numerical-tractable — wormhole cross-sections in concrete AdS/CFT setups are computable (Stanford-Susskind 2014 *Phys. Rev. D* 90:126007 [arXiv:1406.2678] develops complexity-volume duality on top, also computable; companion paper Susskind-Zhao 2014 [arXiv:1408.2823] extends to switchback geometries — citation disambiguation Wave R 2026-05-06 per Researcher iter-7 C2). Honest-claude flag: WebFetch returned abstract only, not the precise formula derivation; the S ~ A/(4ℓ_P²) form is canonical Bekenstein-Hawking applied to the ER bridge's minimal cross-section, but the precise ER=EPR-paper equation was not fetched. | Earlier history: status was 'invalid' (Wave L Tier E1, 2026-05-05) until this commit completed the pivot. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S3 unknown<->unknown naming applied (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S3): [quantum, gravity]. Rationale (HIGH: entanglement (quantum) <-> wormhole geometry (gravity); ER=EPR).",
       "formalKey": "be-43",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.PlanckArea.area_law",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -1537,6 +1594,7 @@
         "unknown"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Infinite conservation laws on the horizon",
       "formula_latex": "Q_{\\text{soft}}^{\\pm} = \\int_{\\mathcal{I}^{\\pm}} \\frac{\\partial}{\\partial u} C_{z\\bar{z}} Y^z dz \\wedge d\\bar{z}",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1580,6 +1638,7 @@
         "cosmological"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Quantum gravity constraints on inflation",
       "formula_latex": "N_e < \\log\\left(\\frac{M_P}{H_{\\text{inf}}}\\right) - \\gamma \\log\\left(\\frac{r}{0.01}\\right)",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1618,6 +1677,7 @@
         "unknown"
       ],
       "status": "highly-speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Probability distribution over universes",
       "formula_latex": "P[O] = \\int d\\mu[g,\\phi] , W[g,\\phi] , \\delta(O - O[g,\\phi])",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1660,6 +1720,7 @@
         "dark-sector"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Dark matter effects on light element abundances",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{dY}{dt} + 3HY = \\langle\\sigma v\\rangle_{\\text{SM}} n_p n_n - \\langle\\sigma v\\rangle_{\\text{dark}} n_\\chi^2 \\epsilon_{\\text{transfer}}",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1696,6 +1757,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "GRW mass-amplified spontaneous-localization rate λ_GRW(m) = λ_0 · (m/m_0), the GRW (QMSL) centre-of-mass amplification λ_macro = N λ_micro (Bassi & Ghirardi 2003 §6.4); in CSL the macroscopic rate is γ D_0 n_out instead (§8.3). A particle of mass m localizes at rate proportional to m/m_0, where m_0 is the nucleon mass and λ_0 ≈ 10⁻¹⁶ /s is the canonical GRW 1986 single-nucleon rate. The full Lindblad master equation is the framing; the scalar rate is the AST-encoded bridge content.",
       "formula_latex": "\\lambda_{\\text{GRW}}(m) = \\lambda_0 \\cdot \\frac{m}{m_0}, \\quad \\lambda_0 \\approx 10^{-16}\\,\\text{s}^{-1}, \\quad m_0 = m_{\\text{nucleon}}",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1743,6 +1805,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Classical reality from quantum substrate",
       "formula_latex": "I(S:F_k) = I(S:E) - \\mathcal{O}(k^{-\\alpha})",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1784,6 +1847,7 @@
         "unknown"
       ],
       "status": "highly-speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Time-symmetric formulation: half-retarded-plus-half-advanced gauge field with absorber boundary condition (Wheeler-Feynman 1945)",
       "formula_latex": "A_\\mu(x) = \\frac{1}{2} \\left[ A_\\mu^{\\text{ret}}(x) + A_\\mu^{\\text{adv}}(x) \\right]",
       "source_part": "II",
@@ -1805,6 +1869,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L M T^-2 I^-1]",
       "notes": "Encoded 2026-05-07 (Wave Z): Tier-5 AST encoding for the Wheeler-Feynman time-symmetry residual landed (the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json)). dimensional_signature null → '[1]'. The original Wave P-A canonical form A_μ(x) = (1/2)[A_μ^ret(x) + A_μ^adv(x)] is preserved in formula_latex; AST encodes OpenAI's reduction r_TS = (A_ret − A_adv)/(A_ret + A_adv) — the time-symmetry residual that vanishes identically (≡ 0) under the absorber boundary condition. Both A_ret and A_adv pinned to MAGNETIC_VECTOR_POTENTIAL dim {L:1, M:1, T:-2, I:-1} (V·s/m); the ratio is dimensionless. Honest-claude scope notes: the encoded scalar is a ratio (gauge-field dim cancels); the \"≡ 0\" identity-pin assumes the absorber boundary condition (any non-zero residual measures retrocausal-asymmetry violation); encoding pins the dimensional structure but does NOT bridge the absorber-theory claim to mainstream QFT. Status remains 'highly-speculative' (the absorber boundary condition is empirically untested in QFT). Gemini-Pro-confirmed second-opinion 2026-05-07: \"fundamentally algebraic and poses no representational challenges; maps directly and losslessly into the scalar AST\". | Reformulated 2026-05-06 (Wave P-A R-A4, per Math iter-5 / Researcher iter-5 strategic pivot — complete bridges to canonical literature forms when one exists, rather than preserving R3-invalid). Replaced the broken S = ∫ d⁴x [L_forward(φ_+) + L_backward(φ_-) + λφ_+ φ_- δ⁴(x − x_m)] action (variationally ill-posed at the δ⁴ single-point interaction — δ-function source terms in equations of motion are not finite-action solutions, boundary conditions for backward-evolving φ_- sector were unspecified) with the canonical Wheeler-Feynman 1945 absorber-theory form: the gauge field expressed as the half-retarded-plus-half-advanced symmetric sum A_μ(x) = (1/2)[A_μ^ret(x) + A_μ^adv(x)]. Reference verified canonical via WebFetch on the Wheeler-Feynman_absorber_theory Wikipedia article: \"the resulting field is E_tot(x,t) = Σ_n [E_n^ret(x,t) + E_n^adv(x,t)]/2\" (gauge-field analogue is A_μ form above). The action is then standard Maxwell + matter + interaction with this gauge-field expression. The retrocausal claim is that the **absorber boundary condition** — every emitted radiation is absorbed somewhere in the universe — makes the half-retarded-plus-half-advanced symmetric form physically equivalent to the standard retarded-only Maxwell formulation, per Wheeler & Feynman's original argument. Status remains 'highly-speculative' because the absorber boundary condition is empirically untested in QFT (it works in classical electrodynamics under the cosmological total-absorption assumption, but its quantum-field-theoretic extension — which is what UPT proposes — is conjectural). Cramer 1986 provides the canonical modern transactional-interpretation lineage; it remains a minority interpretation. The W-F form itself is rigorously defined, hence the reformulation lifts BE-50 from invalid to highly-speculative. tractability_class lifted from 'formally-divergent' to 'numerical-tractable' since the half-retarded-half-advanced gauge field is computable in concrete cases (Hoyle-Narlikar 1995 works through cosmological-absorber configurations). | Earlier history: previous form was the L_forward + L_backward + λφ_+ φ_- δ⁴(x-x_m) action (R3-invalid Wave L Tier E2, 2026-05-05, per Phys C8 iter-3). This commit completes the pivot to the canonical W-F form. | 2026-05-23 BRIDGE-PHYSICS-AUDIT S3 unknown<->unknown classification applied (per docs/architecture/archive/v0.7-physics-judgment-proposals.md S3): NOT-A-BRIDGE. LOW NOT-A-BRIDGE: time-symmetric retarded/advanced EM; single regime with time-reversal structure. The bridges array remains [unknown, unknown] as the structural marker for not actually a regime-spanning bridge. Future v0.8+ restructuring may move this entry to a separate LAW_EQUATIONS registry.",
       "formalKey": "be-50",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.TimeSymmetric.wheeler_feynman",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 1,
@@ -1827,6 +1892,7 @@
         "general relativity"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "Deflection of light by a point mass under the weak-field (post-Newtonian) approximation α = 4GM/(bc²). Eddington's 1919 eclipse expedition confirmed GR's prediction of ~1.75 arcsec for a grazing solar ray — double the Newtonian value — to within the measurement precision of the time.",
       "formula_latex": "\\alpha = \\frac{4 G M}{b c^2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -1876,7 +1942,8 @@
           }
         }
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-51"
+      "formalKey": "be-51",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Deflection.line_integral"
     },
     {
       "id": 52,
@@ -1889,6 +1956,7 @@
         "general relativity"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "GR prediction of anomalous perihelion advance per orbit: Δφ = 6πGM/(a(1−e²)c²). Einstein's 1915 calculation reproduced Mercury's observed ~43 arcsec/century excess precession (beyond Newtonian + planetary perturbations) — the first successful quantitative GR test, predating the 1919 Eddington eclipse expedition.",
       "formula_latex": "\\Delta\\varphi = \\frac{6\\pi G M}{a(1-e^2)c^2}",
       "source_part": "I",
@@ -1956,6 +2024,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "One-loop renormalization-group running of the non-Abelian gauge coupling in Yang-Mills theory. For SU(N_c) with N_f fundamental Dirac flavors: β(g) = −b₀ g³/(16π²), b₀ = (11/3)N_c − (2/3)N_f. When b₀ > 0 the theory is asymptotically free (coupling → 0 in the UV). For QCD (SU(3), N_f = 6): b₀ = 7. Nobel Prize in Physics 2004 (Gross, Politzer, Wilczek).",
       "formula_latex": "\\beta(g) = -\\frac{b_0 g^3}{16\\pi^2} + O(g^5), \\quad b_0 = \\frac{11}{3}C_2(G) - \\frac{4}{3}T(R)N_f",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -1972,6 +2041,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Added 2026-05-24 (v0.7 BE-X re-encoding sprint): Yang-Mills one-loop β-function via BetaFunctionNode structural form. Module: the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). Structural dual of BE-39 (asymptotic safety NGFP at (g*,λ*)≠(0,0)) — BE-53 has the UV fixed point at g*=0 (asymptotic freedom), demonstrating BetaFunctionNode primitives are flow-direction-agnostic. Single-coupling BetaFunctionNode (couplings.length=1) vs BE-39's two-coupling form. QCD values pinned: b₀=7 (N_c=3, N_f=6), β(g=1)=−7/(16π²). Pure SU(3) (N_f=0): b₀=11. Asymptotic-freedom boundary: b₀=0 at N_f=(11/2)N_c≈16.5 for SU(3). Nobel Prize in Physics 2004 (Gross, Politzer, Wilczek) — status 'established'.",
       "formalKey": "be-53",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.YangMills.b0_pos_iff_nf_le",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -1995,6 +2065,7 @@
         "cosmological"
       ],
       "status": "speculative",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Modified Friedmann equation on a RS II 3-brane embedded in a 5D AdS bulk: H² = (8πG/3)ρ(1 + ρ/(2σ)) + Λ/3. The brane-tension correction (1 + ρ/(2σ)) enhances expansion at high energy densities (ρ ~ σ); at ρ ≪ σ it reduces to classical Friedmann. Brane cosmology is experimentally unconstrained but provides a self-consistent extra-dimensional framework for early-universe corrections.",
       "formula_latex": "H^2 = \\frac{8\\pi G}{3} \\rho \\left(1 + \\frac{\\rho}{2\\sigma}\\right) + \\frac{\\Lambda}{3}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2011,6 +2082,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[T^-2]",
       "notes": "Added 2026-05-24 (v0.7 BE-54): Randall-Sundrum II brane cosmology bridge. evaluateRandallSundrumH2({rho_kg_per_m3, sigma_kg_per_m3}) → H² in s⁻² (drops Λ and dark-radiation for structural minimum). Brane correction (1+ρ/(2σ)) is DIMENSIONLESS — ρ/σ cancels [M L⁻³]. Key physics: correction = 3/2 at ρ=σ; correction = 2 at ρ=2σ; H² ≥ 0 always (unlike LQC which can go negative). v0.7 follow-up (commit b8153f6) added BE54_BRANE_FRIEDMANN_STRUCTURAL using FriedmannEquationNode with variant='brane' — exercises the variant-discriminator design payoff. Category E (Cosmological-Quantum Bridges) chosen over K (Modified Theories) because the brane-tension σ is a Planck-scale parameter; the correction is a high-density quantum-gravity effect. Source: the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json).",
       "formalKey": "be-54",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.RandallSundrum.brane_friedmann",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -2032,6 +2104,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The Hall conductance of a 2D electron gas in a strong magnetic field is quantized: σ_xy = C·e²/h, with C an integer TKNN/Chern number — a TOPOLOGICAL invariant of the filled bands. Equivalently R_H = R_K/C, von Klitzing constant R_K = h/e² ≈ 25812.807 Ω. The quantization is material-INDEPENDENT (topological), confirmed to ~1×10⁻¹⁰ across graphene vs GaAs. Populates the rank-6 tensor's Topology axis. von Klitzing 1980 (Nobel 1985); topological interpretation TKNN 1982.",
       "formula_latex": "\\sigma_{xy} = C \\frac{e^2}{h}, \\quad R_H = \\frac{R_K}{C}, \\quad R_K = \\frac{h}{e^2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2053,6 +2126,7 @@
         "unitSystem": "SI"
       },
       "formalKey": "be-55",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.QuantumHall.reciprocal",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -2,
         "M": -1,
@@ -2074,6 +2148,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Two neutral parallel conducting plates in vacuum attract, because boundary conditions restrict the allowed EM vacuum modes between them. Ideal (perfect-conductor, T=0) force per unit area: F/A = −π²ℏc/(240 d⁴), d the separation. Bridges the QUANTUM vacuum (zero-point fluctuations) to a CLASSICAL macroscopic force. Casimir 1948; measured by Lamoreaux 1997 (~5%) and Mohideen & Roy 1998 (~1%). Real experiments use sphere-plate geometry with finite-conductivity/roughness/temperature corrections — the confrontation is systematics-dominated (Adam/Eve vet, Eve YELLOW).",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{F}{A} = -\\frac{\\pi^2 \\hbar c}{240\\, d^4}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2108,6 +2183,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "A uniformly accelerated observer in the Minkowski vacuum perceives a thermal bath at the Unruh temperature T = ℏa/(2π c k_B), a the proper acceleration. Bridges KINEMATICS (acceleration) to a QUANTUM-THERMAL observable — the kinematic sibling of Hawking radiation (BE-42: horizon surface gravity κ → temperature via the same 2π, a → κ). Fulling 1973 / Davies 1975 / Unruh 1976. NO data test: lab accelerations give T ≈ 4×10⁻²⁰ K (unmeasurable); analog-gravity results indirect.",
       "formula_latex": "T = \\frac{\\hbar a}{2\\pi c k_B}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2144,6 +2220,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "A resistor R in thermal equilibrium at temperature T generates a fluctuating voltage with one-sided power spectral density S_V = 4 k_B T R. The fluctuation-dissipation theorem for a circuit: equilibrium voltage FLUCTUATIONS are fixed by the DISSIPATION (R). Bridges THERMAL fluctuation to ELECTRICAL dissipation. Johnson 1928 (measurement), Nyquist 1928 (derivation). NOTE: BE-27 is the speculative active-matter FDT VIOLATION; BE-58 is the established theorem it violates.",
       "formula_latex": "S_V = 4 k_B T R",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2167,6 +2244,7 @@
         "unitSystem": "SI"
       },
       "formalKey": "be-58",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.JohnsonNyquist.tendsto_classical",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 4,
         "M": 2,
@@ -2188,6 +2266,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "A Josephson junction biased at DC voltage V emits radiation at f = K_J·V, with the Josephson constant K_J = 2e/h, exact in the post-2019 SI (483597.8484 GHz/V to 10 significant figures). The factor 2e is the Cooper-pair charge — the effect is macroscopic quantum coherence of a BOSONIC condensate. It is the quantum standard of the volt; with BE-55 (R_K = h/e², the ohm) and BE-58 (k_B via Johnson noise) it completes the quantum metrology triangle. Josephson 1962 (Nobel 1973).",
       "formula_latex": "f = \\frac{2e}{h} V, \\quad K_J = \\frac{2e}{h}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2212,6 +2291,7 @@
         "unitSystem": "SI"
       },
       "formalKey": "be-59",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Josephson.frequency_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -2233,6 +2313,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "At fractional filling ν = p/q (q odd) the Hall conductance is quantized at σ_xy = ν·e²/h — but unlike the integer QHE (BE-55, single-particle topology), the fractional plateaux are EMERGENT TOPOLOGICAL ORDER of a strongly-correlated electron liquid. The quasiparticles carry FRACTIONAL charge e/3 and obey ANYONIC exchange statistics. The empirical content is the FRACTION itself (why exactly 1/3?), not R_K. Tsui, Störmer & Gossard 1982 (Nobel 1998); Laughlin 1983.",
       "formula_latex": "\\sigma_{xy} = \\nu \\frac{e^2}{h}, \\quad R_{xy} = \\frac{R_K}{\\nu} = \\frac{q}{p}\\frac{h}{e^2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2249,6 +2330,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-2 M^-1 T^3 I^2]",
       "notes": "Added 2026-07-05 (condensed-matter cluster): fractional QH σ_xy = ν·e²/h. Closed-form evaluator evaluateFractionalQH({nu}) → {sigma_xy_S, R_xy_ohm} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). Confronted via be60-fractional-qh-confrontation.ts on the ⅓ FRACTION (R_xy = 3·R_K, topological order) — NOT R_K. topology 'chern' (fractional), statistics 'anyonic' (e/3 quasiparticles). Adam/Eve physics vet 2026-07-05: GREEN/GREEN.",
       "formalKey": "be-60",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Laughlin.filling_fraction",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -2,
         "M": -1,
@@ -2270,6 +2352,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "The ratio of thermal to electrical conductivity in a metal is κ/(σT) = L₀ = (π²/3)(k_B/e)² ≈ 2.44×10⁻⁸ W·Ω·K⁻², the Sommerfeld Lorenz number — because the same degenerate carriers near the Fermi surface carry both charge and heat. A signature of Fermi-liquid transport. Wiedemann & Franz 1853 (empirical); Sommerfeld 1927 (L₀).",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{\\kappa}{\\sigma T} = L_0 = \\frac{\\pi^2}{3}\\left(\\frac{k_B}{e}\\right)^2",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2284,6 +2367,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L M T^-3 Theta^-1]",
       "notes": "Added 2026-07-05 (condensed-matter cluster): Wiedemann-Franz L₀ = (π²/3)(k_B/e)². Closed-form evaluator evaluateWiedemannFranz({sigma_S_per_m, T_K}) → {kappa_W_per_mK, L0_W_ohm_per_K2} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). Confronted via be61-wiedemann-franz-confrontation.ts (consistency: measured Lorenz number vs L₀; DEGENERATE-LIMIT caveat — pure Ag@low-T recovers L₀, Cu@0°C ~9% low, inelastic scattering suppresses L at intermediate T). Statistics tag STRIPPED (Eve YELLOW — contested transport-ratio tag). Adam/Eve physics vet 2026-07-05: GREEN(Adam)/YELLOW(Eve).",
       "formalKey": "be-61",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Sommerfeld.integral_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 1,
@@ -2305,6 +2389,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "pending",
       "context": "Weak-coupling BCS theory predicts a universal, parameter-free ratio between the T=0 superconducting gap and the critical temperature: 2Δ(0)/(k_B T_c) = 2π/e^γ ≈ 3.528 (γ = Euler-Mascheroni), i.e. Δ(0) = 1.764 k_B T_c. Bardeen, Cooper & Schrieffer 1957 (Nobel 1972).",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{2\\Delta(0)}{k_B T_c} = \\frac{2\\pi}{e^{\\gamma}} \\approx 3.528",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2339,6 +2424,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The maximum mass of a white dwarf supported by electron degeneracy pressure: M_Ch = (ω₃⁰√(3π)/2)(ℏc/G)^(3/2)(μ_e m_u)⁻² ≈ 1.44 M_⊙ (μ_e=2 for C/O). Bridges QUANTUM degeneracy pressure to a GRAVITATIONAL stellar-structure limit — the Type Ia SN progenitor scale. Chandrasekhar 1931 (Nobel 1983); ω₃⁰≈2.018 is the Lane-Emden n=3 surface constant.",
       "formula_latex": "M_{Ch} = \\frac{\\omega_3^0 \\sqrt{3\\pi}}{2}\\left(\\frac{\\hbar c}{G}\\right)^{3/2}\\frac{1}{(\\mu_e m_u)^2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2353,6 +2439,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[mass]",
       "notes": "Added 2026-07-05 (astrophysics cluster): Chandrasekhar mass. Closed-form evaluator evaluateChandrasekharMass({mu_e}) → {M_Ch_kg, M_Ch_solar} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json) (≈1.456 M_⊙ at μ_e=2, m_u convention). Confronted via be63-chandrasekhar-mass-confrontation.ts (consistency: ~1.4 M_⊙ vs observed WD max ~1.35 M_⊙; UPPER-BOUND caveat — super-Chandrasekhar SNe reach 2.4-2.8 M_⊙ via rotation/B-support). Adam/Eve vet 2026-07-05: YELLOW/YELLOW (not tight).",
       "formalKey": "be-63",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Chandrasekhar.prefactor",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 1,
@@ -2374,6 +2461,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "The luminosity at which radiation pressure on ionized hydrogen balances gravity: L_Edd = 4πGM m_p c/σ_T ≈ 1.26×10³¹ W·(M/M_⊙). Bridges a GRAVITATIONAL mass to a RADIATIVE luminosity scale (σ_T = Thomson cross-section) — the characteristic accretion ceiling of stars, X-ray binaries, and AGN. Eddington 1926.",
       "formula_latex": "L_{Edd} = \\frac{4\\pi G M m_p c}{\\sigma_T}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2388,6 +2476,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[power]",
       "notes": "Added 2026-07-05 (astrophysics cluster): Eddington luminosity. Closed-form evaluator evaluateEddingtonLuminosity({M_kg}) → {L_Edd_W, L_Edd_solar} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json) (≈1.257e31 W per M_⊙). Confronted via be64-eddington-luminosity-confrontation.ts (consistency: most accreting sources respect L_Edd; SPHERICAL-SYMMETRY caveat — genuine super-Eddington sources exist, e.g. ULX pulsars). Adam/Eve vet 2026-07-05: RED(Adam)/GREEN(Eve) on the 'tight' framing → resolved as consistency-with-caveat.",
       "formalKey": "be-64",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Eddington.balance_iff",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -2409,6 +2498,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "weak",
       "context": "The critical mass above which a self-gravitating gas cloud collapses against thermal pressure: M_J = (5k_BT/Gμm_u)^(3/2)(3/4πρ)^(1/2). Bridges THERMAL pressure to GRAVITATIONAL collapse — the fragmentation scale of molecular clouds and the seed of star formation. Jeans 1902.",
       "formula_latex": "M_J = \\left(\\frac{5 k_B T}{G \\mu m_u}\\right)^{3/2}\\left(\\frac{3}{4\\pi\\rho}\\right)^{1/2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2422,6 +2512,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[mass]",
       "notes": "Added 2026-07-05 (astrophysics cluster): Jeans mass. Closed-form evaluator evaluateJeansMass({T_K, rho_kg_per_m3, mu}) → {M_J_kg} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). Confronted via be65-jeans-mass-confrontation.ts (ORDER-OF-MAGNITUDE consistency: the collapse mass scale of molecular clouds; the numerical prefactor '5' is convention-dependent). Adam/Eve vet 2026-07-05: GREEN(Adam)/YELLOW(Eve). NOTE: A Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff neutron-star maximum mass was deferred (both reviewers) — EOS-dependent, not a single-constant bridge. It does not occupy id 66. Id 66 is radiation pressure.",
       "formalKey": "be-65",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Jeans.mass_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 1,
@@ -2443,6 +2534,7 @@
         "continuum"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The time-averaged normal pressure of a beam on an opaque surface: P_n = (I/c)(1+R) cos²θ. The absorber endpoint is I/c (R = 0, θ = 0) and the reflector endpoint is 2I/c (R = 1, θ = 0). Bridges an optical intensity to a continuum pressure. The factor of 2 is the mirror factor. BE-64's encoded Thomson force uses factor 1, and PhysJS.Eddington.wrong_dictionary_factor_two doubles a luminosity. Those are different hypotheses. Transmission is zero. The combined (1+R) cos²θ factor is this catalog's assembly of the normal-incidence factor with the oblique factor.",
       "formula_latex": "P_n = \\frac{I}{c}(1+R)\\cos^2\\theta",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2457,6 +2549,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-1 M T^-2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateRadiationPressure({I_W_per_m2, R, theta_rad}) → {P_Pa} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.RadiationPressure.pressure_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Buckingham on {P, I, c} leaves the constant unfixed; the theorem states the opaque-surface factor. No confrontation: the printed I = 10^6 W/m² stand-ins are arithmetic, not measurements.",
       "formalKey": "be-66",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.RadiationPressure.pressure_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -1,
         "M": 1,
@@ -2478,6 +2571,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The phase speed of an ideal-MHD wave along a uniform background field: v_A = B / √(μ0 ρ), with ρ the total mass density. Proton-only ρ = n m_p is a named special case (alfvenProtonOnlyDensity), not the default. Bridges a fluid mass density to a plasma wave speed. The SI coefficient C = 1 is a hypothesis units do not fix. The Gaussian factor 1/√(4π) is a unit dictionary, not a second law. CE-plasma-frequency is a different equation.",
       "formula_latex": "v_A = \\frac{B}{\\sqrt{\\mu_0 \\rho}}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2491,6 +2585,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[velocity]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateAlfvenSpeed({B_T, rho_kg_per_m3}) → {v_m_per_s} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). rho_kg_per_m3 is the total mass density. alfvenProtonOnlyDensity(n_per_m3) = n m_p is the named special case; passing a number density as rho_kg_per_m3 is not that case. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.AlfvenSpeed.speed_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. The 69.95 km/s figure is the proton-only stand-in at B = 12 nT and n = 14 cm⁻³. It does not close a ~60 km/s sentence, and a helium fraction is not claimed to close it. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-67",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.AlfvenSpeed.speed_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -2512,6 +2607,7 @@
         "thermodynamics"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "In static thermal equilibrium the proper temperature satisfies T √(−g_00) = const, with g_00 < 0 in the repository signature. Bridges a gravitational metric component to a thermodynamic temperature. The 1930 form T0 √g_44 is the mostly-minus reference for the sign. T ‖ξ‖ = const is out of scope. This is not a horizon temperature and is not a dependency of BE-42. Units produce two invariants and do not identify them, so a constant-T reading is a different claim.",
       "formula_latex": "T\\sqrt{-g_{00}} = \\mathrm{const}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2525,6 +2621,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[temperature]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateTolmanEhrenfest({T_K, g_00}) → {invariant_K} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). Requires T > 0 and g_00 < 0. Math.sqrt(g_00) is NaN for g_00 < 0 and is not the formula. tolmanTemperatureAt(invariant, g_00) recovers T. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.TolmanEhrenfest.hydrostatic_constant, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not chained through be-42. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-68",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.TolmanEhrenfest.hydrostatic_constant",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -2546,6 +2643,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The phase speed of a compressional polarization perpendicular to a uniform field: |ω/k| = √(c_s² + B²/(μ0 ρ)). Bridges a fluid sound speed to a plasma wave speed. c_s = 0 recovers B/√(μ0 ρ), the Alfvén number of a different polarization, and is not an identification with BE-67. The oblique fast mode and a kinetic dispersion relation are out of scope. The textbook quartic's ω = 0 root does not solve compressional induction.",
       "formula_latex": "\\left|\\frac{\\omega}{k}\\right| = \\sqrt{c_s^2 + \\frac{B^2}{\\mu_0 \\rho}}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2558,6 +2656,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[velocity]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateFastMagnetosonic({cs_m_per_s, B_T, rho_kg_per_m3}) → {v_m_per_s} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.FastMagnetosonic.speed_eq, kind bridge. perpendicularQuartic (PhysJS.FastMagnetosonic.perpendicular_of_dispersion) is nested and is not the formalRef. The catalog path passes the top-level reference, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not composed into be-67. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-69",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.FastMagnetosonic.speed_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -2579,6 +2678,7 @@
         "electromagnetic"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "On a Boltzmann profile, a field at which the drift flux cancels the diffusion flux gives D = μ k_B T / q. μ is the electrical mobility. The force-mobility writing needs μ_force = μ/q. Dropping q fails when q ≠ 1. Stokes–Einstein and the Fermi-liquid form are different equations.",
       "formula_latex": "D = \\frac{\\mu k_B T}{q}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2591,6 +2691,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^2 T^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateEinsteinRelation({mu_m2_per_Vs, T_K, q_C}) → {D_m2_per_s} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.EinsteinRelation.diffusion_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not a master equation and not a Fermi liquid. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-70",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.EinsteinRelation.diffusion_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 0,
@@ -2612,6 +2713,7 @@
         "continuum"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Along coexistence, dP/dT = L/(T Δv), with L = T (s2−s1) the specific latent heat. The entropy slope (s2−s1)/(v2−v1) is the companion reading inside that substitution. It is not a second catalog equation. Dropping T, or replacing Δv by one phase volume, is a different slope. The ideal-gas integrated vapor-pressure law is not this row.",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{\\mathrm{d}P}{\\mathrm{d}T} = \\frac{L}{T \\Delta v}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2624,6 +2726,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-1 M T^-2 Theta^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateClapeyron({L_J_per_kg, T_K, delta_v_m3_per_kg}) → {slope_Pa_per_K} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). L is specific (J/kg) and Δv is a specific-volume change (m³/kg). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.Clapeyron.slope_eq, kind bridge. There is no entropy_slope key. The catalog path passes the reference, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-71",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Clapeyron.slope_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -1,
         "M": 1,
@@ -2645,6 +2748,7 @@
         "radiation"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Two static observers of one coordinate period have ν1/ν2 = √(g2/g1), with both g_00 negative. This is not BE-68. If the Tolman products also agree, the temperature ratio equals the frequency ratio, and neither factor is derived from the other. Equal temperatures on g_00 = −1 and g_00 = −4 are not a Tolman equilibrium, while the frequency ratio is 2. Not a horizon temperature and not PhysJS.HawkingUnruh.dictionary.",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{\\nu_1}{\\nu_2} = \\sqrt{\\frac{g_2}{g_1}}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2657,6 +2761,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateGravitationalRedshift({g1, g2}) → {frequency_ratio} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). Both components must be negative. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.GravitationalRedshift.frequency_ratio, kind bridge. tolmanRatio (PhysJS.GravitationalRedshift.tolman_same_ratio) is nested and is not the formalRef. The catalog path passes the top-level reference, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge does not compose into be-68: the quantities are disjoint, and the frequency ratio is not the Tolman invariant. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-72",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.GravitationalRedshift.frequency_ratio",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -2678,6 +2783,7 @@
         "electrical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The isothermal Peltier coefficient and the open-circuit Seebeck coefficient satisfy Π = S T when the Onsager coefficients agree. That equality is ThermoelectricOnsager.onsager, a structure field naming microscopic reversibility, not an axiom and not a measured thermopower. Without it the two coefficients disagree. The first Thomson relation is a different equation.",
       "formula_latex": "\\Pi = S T",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2690,6 +2796,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^2 M T^-3 I^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateKelvinPeltier({S_V_per_K, T_K}) → {Pi_V} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). Onsager reciprocity is not a numeric input. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.KelvinRelation.peltier_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not the first Thomson relation. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-73",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.KelvinRelation.peltier_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -2711,6 +2818,7 @@
         "continuum"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The magnetic pressure of a long solenoid is p_B = B²/(2 μ0). The 2 is the inductor integral U = (L/2) I²: at fixed current the battery supplies twice the rise in stored energy, and the difference is the mechanical work. Homogeneity in B and μ0 gives p = C B²/μ0 with C unfixed. C = 1 is the battery work per volume, not this pressure. Not a kinetic pressure, and not a Lagrangian derivation of the Maxwell stress tensor.",
       "formula_latex": "p_B = \\frac{B^2}{2\\mu_0}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2723,6 +2831,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-1 M T^-2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateMagneticPressure({B_T}) → {p_Pa} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The factor 2 is in the evaluator. Units fix p ∝ B²/μ0 and do not fix the 2. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.MagneticPressure.pressure_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-74",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.MagneticPressure.pressure_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -1,
         "M": 1,
@@ -2744,6 +2853,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The London depth is λ_L = √(m/(μ0 n e²)), with e the elementary charge. On B(x) = B0 exp(−x/λ), Ampere's law and the London equation give that root. The dimension matrix of {m, μ0, n, e} also admits μ0 e²/m, so units do not choose. Those lengths disagree when n (μ0 e²/m)³ ≠ 1. Replacing e by 2e fails. Not the classical skin depth.",
       "formula_latex": "\\lambda_L = \\sqrt{\\frac{m}{\\mu_0 n e^2}}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2756,6 +2866,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[length]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateLondonPenetration({m_kg, n_per_m3}) → {lambda_m} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). e is E_SI, not an input and not Euler's number. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.LondonPenetration.depth_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not the classical skin depth. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-75",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.LondonPenetration.depth_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -2777,6 +2888,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Plasma beta is β = p_gas / p_B, where p_B is the magnetic pressure of BE-74, so β = p_gas / (B²/(2 μ0)) = 2 μ0 p_gas / B². The ideal-gas closure p_gas = n k_B T gives β = 2 μ0 n k_B T / B². B ≠ 0. Using B²/μ0 in place of the magnetic pressure is half of this beta. Not a unique monomial of {n, T, B, μ0}, and not a plasma-β inequality.",
       "formula_latex": "\\beta = \\frac{2 \\mu_0 n k_B T}{B^2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2791,6 +2903,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluatePlasmaBeta({n_per_m3, T_K, p_B_Pa}) → {beta} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). p_B_Pa is B²/(2 μ0). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.PlasmaBeta.beta_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge composes with be-74 on magnetic-pressure. The edge confidence stays established. Not a plasma-β inequality. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-76",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.PlasmaBeta.beta_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -2812,6 +2925,7 @@
         "continuum"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Steady axisymmetric Newtonian flow in a straight circular pipe, with d/dr (r du/dr) = (G/μ) r, centerline slope 0, and no-slip u(R) = 0, integrates to Q = π R⁴ ΔP / (8 μ L) once G = −ΔP/L. Darcy's definitions of that same profile give f_D Re = 64. The Fanning normalization of the wall shear is 16. A square duct is a different eigenvalue. The axial balance, no-slip, and the Darcy definitions are hypotheses.",
       "formula_latex": "Q = \\frac{\\pi R^4 \\Delta P}{8 \\mu L}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2824,6 +2938,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^3 T^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateHagenPoiseuille({R_m, deltaP_Pa, mu_Pa_s, L_m}) → {Q_m3_per_s} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The 8 is the integral of the no-slip parabola. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.HagenPoiseuille.flow_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not a square duct and not the Fanning factor 16. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-77",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.HagenPoiseuille.flow_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 3,
         "M": 0,
@@ -2845,6 +2960,7 @@
         "mechanical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The Euler–Bernoulli balance y'' = −ω² y with ω² = P/(E I) and pinned ends y(0) = y(L) = 0 has the eigenfunction sin(π x/L) at P = π² E I/L². Every nontrivial solution has ω L = n π for a nonzero integer n, so the load is at least that value. The clamped-free column is π² E I/(4 L²). That factor is not the pinned load. The beam equation is a hypothesis.",
       "formula_latex": "P_{\\mathrm{cr}} = \\frac{\\pi^2 E I}{L^2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2857,6 +2973,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[force]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateEulerBuckling({E_Pa, I_m4, L_m}) → {P_N} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.EulerBuckling.critical_load, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not the cantilever load. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-78",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.EulerBuckling.critical_load",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 1,
@@ -2878,6 +2995,7 @@
         "continuum"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "C = ε0 A/g has dC/dg = −ε0 A/g². Equilibrium of a linear spring against the coenergy force is k(g0−g) = ε0 A V²/(2 g²). The fold of (g0−g) g² is g = 2 g0/3, and the voltage there is V_pi = sqrt(8 k g0³/(27 ε0 A)). g = g0/2 is not the fold. Not a fringing field. The parallel-plate law and the quasi-static balance are hypotheses.",
       "formula_latex": "V_{\\mathrm{pi}} = \\sqrt{\\frac{8 k g_0^3}{27 \\varepsilon_0 A}}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2890,6 +3008,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^2 M T^-3 I^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluatePullIn({k_N_per_m, g0_m, A_m2}) → {V_pi_V} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). ε0 is EPS0_SI. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.PullIn.pull_in_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not a fringing field. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-79",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.PullIn.pull_in_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -2911,6 +3030,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Drift J = q n μ E and Poisson dE/dx = q n/ε give E dE/dx = J/(ε μ). With E(0) = 0 the integral is E²/2 = J x/(ε μ), and the nonnegative root from 0 to d is J = (9/8) ε μ V²/d³. A factor other than 9/8 is not this current. Not Child–Langmuir. Drift, Poisson, and the injecting contact are hypotheses.",
       "formula_latex": "J = \\frac{9}{8} \\varepsilon \\mu \\frac{V^2}{d^3}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2923,6 +3043,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-2 I]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateMottGurney({eps, mu_m2_per_Vs, V_volts, d_m}) → {J_A_per_m2} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). eps is the solid permittivity in F/m, not necessarily ε0. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.MottGurney.current_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not Child–Langmuir. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-80",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.MottGurney.current_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -2,
         "M": 0,
@@ -2944,6 +3065,7 @@
         "vacuum"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Collisionless energy (1/2) m v² = e φ, J = ρ v, and Poisson φ'' = ρ/ε0 give a current independent of x only for φ ∝ x^{4/3}. The profile φ = V (x/d)^{4/3} has φ(0) = 0, φ(d) = V, and cathode field 0, and for x > 0 its current is J = (4 ε0/9) sqrt(2 e/m) V^{3/2}/d². e is the elementary charge. The Mott–Gurney exponent does not cancel. Poisson is not claimed at x = 0. Not a drift-only solid.",
       "formula_latex": "J = \\frac{4 \\varepsilon_0}{9} \\sqrt{\\frac{2 e}{m}} \\frac{V^{3/2}}{d^2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2956,6 +3078,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-2 I]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateChildLangmuir({m_kg, V_volts, d_m}) → {J_A_per_m2} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). e is E_SI, not an input and not Euler's number. ε0 is EPS0_SI. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.ChildLangmuir.current_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not Mott–Gurney. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-81",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ChildLangmuir.current_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -2,
         "M": 0,
@@ -2977,6 +3100,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Quasi-equilibrium multiplies the equilibrium flux by exp(e V/(η k_B T)). Ideality 1 sets η = 1. Detailed balance sets the reverse flux equal to the forward flux at V = 0, and low injection keeps that reverse flux under bias. The net current is I = I_s (exp(e V/(k_B T)) − 1). Zero bias carries zero current. Ideality 2 is not this current when e V ≠ 0. e is the elementary charge. Not a diffusion-length ODE.",
       "formula_latex": "I = I_s \\left(\\exp\\left(\\frac{e V}{k_B T}\\right) - 1\\right)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -2989,6 +3113,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[I]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateShockleyDiode({I_s_A, V_volts, T_K}) → {I_A} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). e is E_SI. Euler's number is written exp. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.ShockleyDiode.shockley_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Ideality is 1. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-82",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ShockleyDiode.shockley_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3010,6 +3135,7 @@
         "electrical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The Kelvin relation Π(t) = S(t) t, read along temperature, and the Thomson split μ = dΠ/dT − S give μ_T = T dS/dT by the product rule. dΠ/dT is not μ_T when S T ≠ 0. This is the first Thomson relation. It is not a second copy of Π = S T. The functional Kelvin relation and the Thomson split are hypotheses.",
       "formula_latex": "\\mu_T = T \\frac{\\mathrm{d}S}{\\mathrm{d}T}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3024,6 +3150,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^2 M T^-3 I^-1 Theta^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateThomsonCoefficient({T_K, dS_dT_V_per_K2}) → {mu_V_per_K} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). dS/dT is an input, not a sampled difference of S. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.Thomson.thomson_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge does not compose with be-73: Π is not an input. The dependency is the Kelvin relation the theorem assumes. The edge confidence stays established. Not Π = S T. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-83",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Thomson.thomson_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -3045,6 +3172,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "On an infinite sheet the radial field of a point current is (I R_s)/(2 π r), and the potential drop is the integral of 1/r. Probes at 0, s, 2s, and 3s, with current in at 0 and out at 3s, each contribute (I R_s/(2 π)) ln 2 on the inner pair. Superposition gives R_s = (π/ln 2)(V/I). A sink at 4s gives 2π/ln 3 instead. Not PhysJS.Crossing.antisymmetry. The Laplace field and linear superposition are hypotheses.",
       "formula_latex": "R_s = \\frac{\\pi}{\\ln 2}\\frac{V}{I}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3057,6 +3185,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^2 M T^-3 I^-2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateFourPointSheet({V_volts, I_A}) → {R_s_ohm} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The spacing s cancels. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.FourPoint.sheet_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not the conformal crossing be-35. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-84",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.FourPoint.sheet_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -3078,6 +3207,7 @@
         "classical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "In a window of length T the count N has mean (I/e) T, and the Poisson premise is Var(N) = mean(N). Charge e scales the variance by e² and the windowed current divides by T, so Var(I) = e I/T. The one-sided bandwidth of that window is Δf = 1/(2 T), and S_I = 2 e I. The two-sided bandwidth Δf = 1/T gives e I. e is the elementary charge. Not a Fourier theorem and not Johnson–Nyquist. The Poisson variance and the one-sided convention are hypotheses.",
       "formula_latex": "S_I = 2 e I",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3090,6 +3220,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[T I^2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateShotNoise({I_A}) → {S_I_A2_per_Hz} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). e is E_SI. The formula is linear in I. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.ShotNoise.shot_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not Johnson–Nyquist and not the two-sided spectrum e I. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-85",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ShotNoise.shot_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3111,6 +3242,7 @@
         "thermal"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Wall fluxes τ = μ du/dy and q = k dT/dy, with C_f = τ/(ρ U²/2), h = q/ΔT, St = h/(ρ U c_p), and Pr = μ c_p/k, satisfy St Pr = C_f/2 when the normalized wall gradients agree. That common slope is the equal-diffusivity hypothesis. At Pr = 1, St = C_f/2. Pr ≠ 1 with nonzero skin friction is not this equality. Not a Nusselt correlation.",
       "formula_latex": "\\mathrm{St} = \\frac{C_f}{2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3123,6 +3255,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateReynoldsAnalogy({C_f}) → {St} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). Pr and the wall slopes are not inputs. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.ReynoldsAnalogy.reynolds_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not a Nusselt correlation. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-86",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ReynoldsAnalogy.reynolds_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3144,6 +3277,7 @@
         "electrical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "dU/dV = C V and U(0) = 0 integrate to U = (C/2) V². The normalized Boltzmann weight of that energy is the Gaussian of mean 0 and variance k_B T/C, because the partition function is the Gaussian integral. The mean square on that law is ⟨v²⟩ = k_B T/C, and (C/2) of it is (1/2) k_B T. (3/2) k_B T/C is not this variance. Dropping the energy half replaces it by k_B T/(2 C). Not three kinetic degrees of freedom.",
       "formula_latex": "\\langle v^2 \\rangle = \\frac{k_B T}{C}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3156,6 +3290,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^4 M^2 T^-6 I^-2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateCapacitorNoise({T_K, C_F}) → {v2_V2} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The two halves cancel. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.CapacitorNoise.noise_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not (3/2) k_B T/C. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-87",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.CapacitorNoise.noise_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 4,
         "M": 2,
@@ -3177,6 +3312,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Two spin states times the sphere (4π/3) k_F³/(2π)³ give n, so k_F³ = 3 π² n and the nonnegative root is k_F = (3 π² n)^{1/3}. The isotropic parabola E = ℏ² k²/(2 m*) is E_F at k_F. Its first derivative is v_F = ℏ k_F/m*. One spin is k_F³ = 6 π² n. Not a lattice band. The band, the two-spin count, and T = 0 are hypotheses.",
       "formula_latex": "k_F = (3\\pi^2 n)^{1/3}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3189,6 +3325,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateFermiSea({n_per_m3, m_kg}) → {k_F_per_m, E_F_J, v_F_m_per_s} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The edge value is k_F. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.FermiSea.fermi_sea, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not a lattice band. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-88",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.FermiSea.fermi_sea",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3210,6 +3347,7 @@
         "continuum"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Three acoustic branches filling 3n states, 3·(4π/3) k_D³/(2π)³ = 3n, give k_D³ = 6 π² n. A linear branch ω_D = v_s k_D is ω_D = v_s (6 π² n)^{1/3}. Equating the three-branch sum to n gives k_D³ = 2 π² n. The branch count and the common speed are hypotheses.",
       "formula_latex": "\\omega_D = v_s (6\\pi^2 n)^{1/3}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3222,6 +3360,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[frequency]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateDebyeCutoff({v_m_per_s, n_per_m3}) → {omega_D_rad_per_s} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.DebyeCutoff.debye_cutoff, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Equating the three-branch sum to n is a different cutoff. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-89",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.DebyeCutoff.debye_cutoff",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3243,6 +3382,7 @@
         "thermal"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The mode integral ∫₀^{ω_D} 9 N ω²/ω_D³ dω = 3 N. The Debye energy with the integral extended to infinity is the hypothesis U = 9 N k_B T (T/θ_D)³ I, and I = π⁴/15 is a hypothesis, not an evaluation of ∫ x³/(exp(x)−1) dx. Nine times π⁴/15 is 3 π⁴/5, and U = A T⁴ differentiates to C_V = (12 π⁴/5) N k_B (T/θ_D)³. The energy prefactor 3 π⁴/5 is not the heat capacity.",
       "formula_latex": "C_V = \\frac{12\\pi^4}{5} N k_B \\left(\\frac{T}{\\theta_D}\\right)^3",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3255,6 +3395,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[entropy]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateDebyeHeat({N, T_K, thetaD_K}) → {C_V_J_per_K} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.DebyeHeat.debye_heat, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. π⁴/15 is assumed. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-90",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.DebyeHeat.debye_heat",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -3276,6 +3417,7 @@
         "thermal"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Three Planck oscillators per atom, each of energy k_B θ_E/(exp(θ_E/T)−1), differentiate to C_V = 3 N k_B (θ_E/T)² exp(θ_E/T)/(exp(θ_E/T)−1)². The zero-point k_B θ_E/2 is constant. The kernel x² e^x/(e^x−1)² tends to 1 as x → 0⁺, so the high-temperature limit is 3 N k_B. One oscillator tends to N k_B. Three oscillators and the Einstein spectrum are hypotheses.",
       "formula_latex": "C_V = 3 N k_B \\left(\\frac{\\theta_E}{T}\\right)^2 \\frac{\\exp(\\theta_E/T)}{(\\exp(\\theta_E/T)-1)^2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3288,6 +3430,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[entropy]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateEinsteinSolid({N, T_K, thetaE_K}) → {C_V_J_per_K} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.EinsteinSolid.einstein_heat, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. One oscillator is a different heat capacity. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-91",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.EinsteinSolid.einstein_heat",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -3309,6 +3452,7 @@
         "thermal"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The Sommerfeld energy correction δU = (π²/6) (k_B T)² g(E_F) is a hypothesis, and its temperature derivative is c_V = (π²/3) k_B² T g(E_F). PhysJS.FermiSea.dos_factor is g(E_F) = (3/2) n/E_F for a √E density, so c_V = (π²/2) n k_B² T/E_F. A flat density g = n/E_F leaves π²/3. Not the Wiedemann–Franz law and not a second proof of be-61.",
       "formula_latex": "c_V = \\frac{\\pi^2}{2} \\frac{n k_B^2 T}{E_F}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3321,6 +3465,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-1 M T^-2 Theta^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateSommerfeldHeat({n_per_m3, T_K, E_F_J}) → {c_V_J_per_K_m3} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.SommerfeldHeat.electronic_heat, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not be-61. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-92",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.SommerfeldHeat.electronic_heat",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -1,
         "M": 1,
@@ -3342,6 +3487,7 @@
         "thermal"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Linear response χ k_B T = μ₀ n (g μ_B)² ⟨S_z²⟩ with the high-temperature moment ⟨S_z²⟩ = S(S+1)/3 gives the Curie constant C = μ₀ n g² μ_B² S(S+1)/(3 k_B). Equal weights on m = ±1/2 give 1/4 = S(S+1)/3 at S = 1/2. Mean field B_eff = B + λ M with θ = C λ/μ₀ gives χ = C/(T−θ). θ = 0 is C/T. A classical moment uses μ²/3. The second moment and the mean-field shift are hypotheses. Not an su(2) derivation. μ_B is an input.",
       "formula_latex": "\\chi = \\frac{C}{T-\\theta},\\quad C = \\frac{\\mu_0 n g^2 \\mu_B^2 S(S+1)}{3 k_B}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3354,6 +3500,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateCurieWeiss({n_per_m3, g, spin, muB_J_per_T, T_K, theta_K}) → {C_K, chi} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The edge value is χ. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.CurieWeiss.curie_weiss, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not an su(2) derivation. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-93",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.CurieWeiss.curie_weiss",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3375,6 +3522,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The Zeeman imbalance M = μ_B² g(E_F) B is a hypothesis, and χ_P = μ₀ M/B is μ₀ μ_B² g(E_F). PhysJS.FermiSea.dos_factor supplies g(E_F) = (3/2) n/E_F, so χ_P = μ₀ μ_B² (3 n)/(2 E_F). A flat density leaves the factor 1. Not Landau diamagnetism. μ_B is an input.",
       "formula_latex": "\\chi_P = \\mu_0 \\mu_B^2 \\frac{3 n}{2 E_F}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3387,6 +3535,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluatePauliParamagnetism({n_per_m3, E_F_J, muB_J_per_T}) → {chi_P} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.PauliParamagnetism.pauli, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not Landau diamagnetism. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-94",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.PauliParamagnetism.pauli",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3408,6 +3557,7 @@
         "magnetic"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "In the normalization with gradient coefficient 1/κ², quartic (1/2)(1−f²)², and field B², the density at κ² = 1/2 is (√2 f' − a f)² + (B + (1−f²)/√2)² minus √2 times the derivative of a(1−f²). Vanishing squares and equal endpoints make that wall integral zero. A trial profile with that critical integral has energy (1/κ² − 2) times the gradient integral: negative when κ > 1/√2, zero at κ = 1/√2, and positive when κ < 1/√2. The positive side is this trial, not every minimizer. The GL density and the profile are hypotheses.",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{1}{\\kappa^2} - 2",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3420,6 +3570,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateGinzburgLandau({kappa}) → {trial_factor} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.GinzburgLandau.type_boundary, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not every minimizer. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-95",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.GinzburgLandau.type_boundary",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3441,6 +3592,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The linearized GL instability sets the Landau-level ground energy ℏ q B/(2 m*) of charge q = 2e equal to |α| = ℏ²/(2 m* ξ²). That level is a hypothesis, not the spectrum of the covariant Laplacian. The field is B = ℏ/(2 e ξ²). With Φ₀ = h/(2e) and h = 2 π ℏ this is B_c2 = Φ₀/(2 π ξ²). Charge e instead of 2e is a different field.",
       "formula_latex": "B_{c2} = \\frac{\\hbar}{2 e \\xi^2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3453,6 +3605,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[M T^-2 I^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateUpperCritical({xi_m}) → {B_c2_T} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). e is E_SI. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.UpperCritical.critical_field, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Charge e is a different field. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-96",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.UpperCritical.critical_field",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 1,
@@ -3474,6 +3627,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The chain rule along E = Δ cosh t pulls the coherence-factor integrand back to sech t for t > 0. ∫₀^T sech = arctan(sinh T), and the limit T → ∞ is π/2. The tunnel Hamiltonian at zero temperature and identical gaps is the hypothesis that e I_c R_n is Δ times that improper integral, so I_c R_n = π Δ/(2 e). A coefficient other than π/2 fails. Not the finite-temperature tanh factor.",
       "formula_latex": "I_c R_n = \\frac{\\pi \\Delta}{2 e}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3486,6 +3640,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^2 M T^-3 I^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateAmbegaokarBaratoff({Delta_J}) → {IcRn_V} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). e is E_SI. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.AmbegaokarBaratoff.ambegaokar_baratoff, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. T = 0 only. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-97",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.AmbegaokarBaratoff.ambegaokar_baratoff",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -3507,6 +3662,7 @@
         "thermal"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The weak-coupling excess free energy F = N(0) (T−T_c)/T_c · Δ² + 7 ζ N(0)/(16 π² T_c²) · Δ⁴ is a hypothesis, with k_B = 1. Its minimum is −α₀² (T−T_c)²/(4 β), and −T ∂²F/∂T² at T_c is ΔC = T_c α₀²/(2 β) = 8 π² N(0) T_c/(7 ζ). The normal heat capacity C_n = (2 π²/3) N(0) T_c is the both-spin Sommerfeld value, a hypothesis. The ratio is 12/(7 ζ). ζ is the quartic coefficient, not a series evaluation. One spin in C_n misses the ratio. Not 2π exp(−γ).",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{\\Delta C}{C_n} = \\frac{12}{7\\zeta}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3519,6 +3675,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateBcsJump({zeta}) → {ratio} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.BcsJump.heat_jump, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. ζ is not evaluated as a series. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-98",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.BcsJump.heat_jump",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3540,6 +3697,7 @@
         "statistical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The Boltzmann tails n = N_c exp(−(E_c−μ)/(k_B T)) and p = N_v exp(−(μ−E_v)/(k_B T)), with E_g = E_c − E_v, multiply to N_c N_v exp(−E_g/(k_B T)). That product is the square of n_i = √(N_c N_v) exp(−E_g/(2 k_B T)). Dropping the 2 in the exponent is a different density. The tails are hypotheses. Not a Fermi–Dirac integral.",
       "formula_latex": "n_i = \\sqrt{N_c N_v}\\,\\exp\\!\\left(-\\frac{E_g}{2 k_B T}\\right)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3552,6 +3710,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-3]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateMassAction({N_c_per_m3, N_v_per_m3, E_g_J, T_K}) → {n_i_per_m3} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.MassAction.mass_action, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Dropping the 2 is a different density. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-99",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.MassAction.mass_action",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -3,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3573,6 +3732,7 @@
         "electromagnetic"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The undamped oscillator ε(ω) = ε(∞) + S/(ω_TO² − ω²) has a zero at ω_LO, which fixes S, and ε(0) is the same function at zero frequency. The ratio is ω_LO²/ω_TO² = ε(0)/ε(∞). The unsquared frequency ratio fails when ω_LO ≠ ω_TO. No damping is a hypothesis.",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{\\omega_{LO}^2}{\\omega_{TO}^2} = \\frac{\\varepsilon(0)}{\\varepsilon(\\infty)}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3585,6 +3745,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateLyddaneSachsTeller({eps_static, eps_inf}) → {frequency_ratio_sq} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.LyddaneSachsTeller.lst, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. The unsquared ratio is a different statement. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-100",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.LyddaneSachsTeller.lst",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3606,6 +3767,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The phase gradient of a θ = φ vortex integrates to π J ln(R/a) between the core and radius R. The entropy hypothesis is the area of core positions, S = k_B ln((R/a)²) = 2 k_B ln(R/a). The free energy E − T S vanishes at a radius past the core only when k_B T = π J/2. Circumference entropy unbinds at π J. J is the stiffness in the vortex energy. Not the renormalization-group flow.",
       "formula_latex": "k_B T = \\frac{\\pi J}{2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3618,6 +3780,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[temperature]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateBktJump({J_J}) → {T_K} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.BktJump.bkt_jump, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not the RG flow. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-101",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.BktJump.bkt_jump",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3639,6 +3802,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "A one-dimensional mode of speed v in a length L has density of states L/(h v) per spin, and the flux times v/L cancels to 1/h. Current is spin · e · (Σ T_n) · (1/h) · Δμ with spin = 2 and Δμ = e V, so G = (2 e²/h) Σ T_n. One spin is e²/h. The transmissions and the bias window are hypotheses. Not the Hall conductance and not Landauer erasure.",
       "formula_latex": "G = \\frac{2 e^2}{h} \\sum_n T_n",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3651,6 +3815,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-2 M^-1 T^3 I^2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateLandauerConductance({sum_Tn}) → {G_S} in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). e is E_SI. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.LandauerConductance.conductance_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not be-55 and not be-16. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-102",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.LandauerConductance.conductance_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -2,
         "M": -1,
@@ -3672,6 +3837,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "cold ions, with n_i(φ) = n0 / sqrt(1 − 2 e φ/(m u0²)) and Boltzmann electrons, have edge slopes whose ratio is at least 1 only when u0² ≥ k_B T_e / m_i. The sound-speed root is the non-negative one. γ_i = 3, from p ∝ n³, is the nested warmSound object and is not γ_i = 5/3. Not a kinetic sheath",
       "formula_latex": "u_0 = \\sqrt{k_B T_e / m_i}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3684,6 +3850,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[velocity]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateBohmSheath in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.BohmSheath.cold_bohm_threshold, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-103",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.BohmSheath.cold_bohm_threshold",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3705,6 +3872,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "cold ions, continuity, ion momentum, and Poisson with Boltzmann electrons inside Poisson give ω² = k² c_s² / (1 + k² λ_De²), with c_s² = k_B T_e / m_i and λ_De² = ε0 k_B T_e / (n0 e²), for k ≠ 0. Warm ions and a kinetic dispersion are not this row",
       "formula_latex": "\\omega^2 = k^2 c_s^2 / (1 + k^2 \\lambda_{De}^2)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3717,6 +3885,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[frequency]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateIonAcoustic in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.IonAcoustic.dispersion_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-104",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.IonAcoustic.dispersion_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3738,6 +3907,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "cold electrons, B along z, and the ansatz Ex = E0 cos(ω t), vx = vx0 sin(ω t), vy = vy0 cos(ω t), with charge −e and ∂Ex/∂t = n e vx / ε0, give ω² = n e²/(ε0 m) + (e B/m)². Not a cyclotron monomial and not ω_pe alone",
       "formula_latex": "\\omega^2 = n e^2/(\\varepsilon_0 m) + (e B/m)^2",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3750,6 +3920,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[frequency]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateUpperHybrid in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.UpperHybrid.upper_hybrid_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-105",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.UpperHybrid.upper_hybrid_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3771,6 +3942,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "the cold Stix index n_R² = 1 − ω_p²/(ω(ω − ω_c)) is a hypothesis. Vanishing n is ω(ω − ω_c) = ω_p². For ω_c ≥ 0 the nonnegative root is ω_R = (ω_c + sqrt(ω_c² + 4 ω_p²))/2. The L root and the whistler limit are nested. The Stix dielectric is not re-derived",
       "formula_latex": "\\omega_R = (\\omega_c + \\sqrt{\\omega_c^2 + 4 \\omega_p^2})/2",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3783,6 +3955,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[frequency]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateColdPlasmaCutoff in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.ColdPlasmaCutoff.cutoff_R, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation. The cold Stix index is a hypothesis of the proof, not a derived dielectric.",
       "formalKey": "be-106",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ColdPlasmaCutoff.cutoff_R",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3804,6 +3977,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "cold singly charged fluids satisfy ω_pe²/ω_ce² = ω_pi²/(ω_ci ω_ce). The ordered balance 1 + ω_pi²/(ω_ci ω_ce) = ω_pi²/ω² is a hypothesis and gives ω² = 1/(1/ω_pi² + 1/(ω_ci ω_ce)). Dropping the leading 1 is a separate hypothesis and leaves ω² = ω_ci ω_ce. Not a cyclotron monomial",
       "formula_latex": "\\omega^2 = 1/(1/\\omega_{pi}^2 + 1/(\\omega_{ci} \\omega_{ce}))",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3816,6 +3990,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[frequency]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateLowerHybrid in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.LowerHybrid.lower_hybrid_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-107",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.LowerHybrid.lower_hybrid_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3837,6 +4012,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "the be-69 quartic with k_∥ = k cos θ is a hypothesis. The phase-speed squares are ½[c_s² + v_A² ± sqrt((c_s² + v_A²)² − 4 c_s² v_A² cos²θ)] for c_s², v_A² ≥ 0. At θ = π/2 the fast root is c_s² + v_A² and the slow root is 0, the perpendicular values and not a second proof of that polarization. At θ = 0 the roots are the larger and smaller of c_s² and v_A²",
       "formula_latex": "v_+^2 = \\tfrac{1}{2}\\left[c_s^2 + v_A^2 + \\sqrt{(c_s^2 + v_A^2)^2 - 4 c_s^2 v_A^2 \\cos^2\\theta}\\right]",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3849,6 +4025,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[velocity]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateObliqueMagnetosonic in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.ObliqueMagnetosonic.phase_speed_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-108",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ObliqueMagnetosonic.phase_speed_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3870,6 +4047,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "a steady z-pinch with B = μ0 I/(2 π r), dI/dr = 2 π r j, and dp/dr = −j B cancels off the axis in d/dr[π r² p + μ0 I²/(8 π)]. Differentiability through the axis is a hypothesis. With I(0) = 0 and p(R) = 0 the fundamental theorem gives μ0 I(R)²/(8 π) = ∫₀^R 2 π r p dr. Equal temperatures are the nested equalTemperature object. The single-population current uses ∫ p dA = N k_B T and is not that hydrogenic current",
       "formula_latex": "I = \\sqrt{16 \\pi N k_B T / \\mu_0}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3882,6 +4060,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[I]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateBennettPinch in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.BennettPinch.bennett_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation. The equal-temperature current is sqrt(16 π N k_B T / μ0). The factor 8 is the single-population current and is not this value. N is particles per unit length.",
       "formalKey": "be-109",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.BennettPinch.bennett_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3903,6 +4082,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "μ = m v_⊥²/(2 B) and the kinetic energy are constant along a field line. Parallel speed vanishes at the mirror, so sin² θ_lc = B0/Bm = 1/R_m with R_m = Bm/B0. Pitch-angle scattering is not this statement",
       "formula_latex": "\\sin^2\\theta_{lc} = B_0/B_m",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3915,6 +4095,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateLossCone in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.LossCone.loss_cone_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-110",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.LossCone.loss_cone_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3936,6 +4117,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "μ = m v_⊥²/(2 B) and the grad-B speed μ |∇B|/(q B) give m v_⊥² |∇B|/(2 q B²). Vacuum low-β curvature uses κ = |∇B|/B, so the curvature speed is m v_∥² |∇B|/(q B²) and the sum is m (v_∥² + v_⊥²/2) |∇B|/(q B²). High-β curvature, where κ ≠ |∇B|/B, is a different vector for m ≠ 0. q is the signed charge",
       "formula_latex": "v = m v_\\perp^2 |\\nabla B| / (2 q B^2)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3948,6 +4130,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[velocity]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateGradBDrift in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.GradBDrift.drift_magnitude, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-111",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.GradBDrift.drift_magnitude",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -3969,6 +4152,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "steady q E + q v × B = 0 with B along z gives v_x = E_y/B and v_y = −E_x/B for q ≠ 0 and B ≠ 0. The opposite charge has the same solution. Not a finite-Larmor-radius drift",
       "formula_latex": "v = |E_\\perp| / |B|",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -3981,6 +4165,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[velocity]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateExBDrift in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.ExBDrift.drift_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-112",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ExBDrift.drift_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4002,6 +4187,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "the Maxwellian f = n/(v_t sqrt(2π)) exp(−v²/(2 v_t²)) has slope −(v/v_t²) f. The residue formula γ = (π ω³/(2 n k²)) (∂f/∂v)|_{ω/k} is a hypothesis, not a contour integral, and gives γ = −sqrt(π/8) ω (ω/(k v_t))³ exp(−ω²/(2 k² v_t²)). Bohm–Gross is the nested bohmGross object and does not replace ω by ω_p in this prefactor",
       "formula_latex": "\\gamma = -\\sqrt{\\pi/8}\\,\\omega\\,(\\omega/(k v_t))^3 \\exp(-\\omega^2/(2 k^2 v_t^2))",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4014,6 +4200,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[frequency]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateLandauDamping in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.LandauDamping.damping_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation. The residue formula is a hypothesis, not a contour integral.",
       "formalKey": "be-113",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.LandauDamping.damping_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4035,6 +4222,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "N_D = (4π/3) n λ_D³. The Rutherford b_90 = e²/(4π ε0 μ v_rel²), at (1/2) μ v_rel² = (3/2) k_B T, is e²/(12 π ε0 k_B T). Then Λ = λ_D/b_90 = 12 π n λ_D³ = 9 N_D. The one-species Debye length is an input. The angular integral and ln Λ are not evaluated",
       "formula_latex": "\\Lambda = 9 N_D",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4047,6 +4235,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateDebyeSphere in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.DebyeSphere.coulomb_argument, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-114",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.DebyeSphere.coulomb_argument",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4068,6 +4257,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "two linearized Boltzmann responses and Poisson give 1/λ_D² = 1/λ₁² + 1/λ₂², with λ_s² = ε0 k_B T_s/(n_s q_s²). Dropping a responding species leaves a different length. The one-species length is not restated",
       "formula_latex": "1/\\lambda_D^2 = 1/\\lambda_1^2 + 1/\\lambda_2^2",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4080,6 +4270,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[length]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateMultiDebye in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.MultiDebye.debye_two, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-115",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.MultiDebye.debye_two",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4101,6 +4292,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "σ_tr = 4π b0² ln Λ is a hypothesis, with b0 = Z e²/(4π ε0 m v²). At v_T² = 2 k_B T/m, ν(v_T) = n_i Z² e⁴ ln Λ √2 / (16 π ε0² √m (k_B T √(k_B T))). The conductivity moment σ = (8/√π) n_e e²/(m ν(v_T)) is a hypothesis, not the Gaussian integral. With n_e = Z n_i it gives η = (π √(2π)/8) Z e² √m ln Λ / ((4π ε0)² (k_B T √(k_B T))). The typed reference closure is nested. The Spitzer–Härm factor 0.51 is not this row",
       "formula_latex": "\\eta = (\\pi \\sqrt{2\\pi}/8)\\, Z e^2 \\sqrt{m} \\ln\\Lambda / ((4\\pi\\varepsilon_0)^2 (k_B T)^{3/2})",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4113,6 +4305,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^3 M T^-3 I^-2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateLorentzResistivity in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.LorentzResistivity.resistivity_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation. The catalog value is the kinetic closure. σ_tr and the conductivity moment are hypotheses. The reference closure η_ref = (32/(3π)) η is nested and is not this value.",
       "formalKey": "be-116",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.LorentzResistivity.resistivity_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 3,
         "M": 1,
@@ -4134,6 +4327,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "η_m = 1/(μ0 σ) and ∂B/∂t = η_m ∂²B/∂x² are hypotheses. The slab mode B0 sin(π x/L) exp(−t/τ) decays at τ = μ0 σ L²/π². A denominator 4π is not π². Rm and the Lundquist number are the nested lundquist object. Not the Reynolds analogy",
       "formula_latex": "\\tau = \\mu_0 \\sigma L^2 / \\pi^2",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4146,6 +4340,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[time]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateResistiveSlab in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.ResistiveSlab.decay_time, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-117",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ResistiveSlab.decay_time",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4167,6 +4362,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "an isothermal spherical wind factors as (v − c_s²/v) dv = (2 c_s²/r − G M/r²) dr. The critical point is both factors vanishing: v² = c_s² and r_c = G M/(2 c_s²). The 2 is spherical divergence. A vanishing coefficient alone does not force the geometric side to vanish",
       "formula_latex": "r_c = G M / (2 c_s^2)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4179,6 +4375,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[length]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateParkerCritical in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.ParkerCritical.critical_radius, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-118",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ParkerCritical.critical_radius",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4200,6 +4397,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "B_φ/B_r = r sinθ dφ/dr and the frozen-in angle dφ/dr = −Ω/v_r give B_φ/B_r = −Ω r sinθ/v_r. sinθ is a real parameter. Dropping the sign is a different spiral",
       "formula_latex": "B_\\phi/B_r = -\\Omega r \\sin\\theta / v_r",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4212,6 +4410,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateParkerSpiral in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.ParkerSpiral.spiral_ratio, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-119",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ParkerSpiral.spiral_ratio",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4233,6 +4432,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "a doubled dipole B_mp = 2 B_E (R_E/r)³ is a hypothesis. Ram balance ρ v² = B_mp²/(2 μ0) at K = 1 gives (R/R_E)⁶ = 2 B_E²/(μ0 ρ v²). Specular 2 ρ v² replaces the numerator 2 by 1. Magnetic pressure is an input, not a proof of be-74",
       "formula_latex": "(R/R_E)^6 = 2 B_E^2 / (\\mu_0 \\rho v^2)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4245,6 +4445,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateChapmanFerraro in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.ChapmanFerraro.standoff_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-120",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ChapmanFerraro.standoff_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4266,6 +4467,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "a 50–50 Maxwellian DT mix, with bremsstrahlung neglected, has fusion power (n² ⟨σv⟩/4) E and thermal power 3 n k_B T/τ. Breakeven gives n τ = 12 k_B T/(⟨σv⟩ E). The 12 is 4 × 3, not either factor alone. The Maxwellian average is not computed, and this is not an evaluated triple product",
       "formula_latex": "n \\tau = 12 k_B T / (\\langle\\sigma v\\rangle E)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4278,6 +4480,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-3 T]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateLawsonBreakeven in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.LawsonBreakeven.breakeven_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-121",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.LawsonBreakeven.breakeven_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -3,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4299,6 +4502,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Γ_e = n0 exp(e Φ/(k_B T)) sqrt(k_B T/(2 π m_e)). Equating it to the Bohm ion flux gives e Φ/(k_B T) = (1/2) ln(2 π m_e/m_i) − 1/2. The ion flux is the nested bohmFlux object. Not Child–Langmuir",
       "formula_latex": "e\\Phi/(k_B T) = \\tfrac{1}{2}\\ln(2\\pi m_e/m_i) - \\tfrac{1}{2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4311,6 +4515,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateLangmuirProbe in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.LangmuirProbe.floating_potential, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-122",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.LangmuirProbe.floating_potential",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4332,6 +4537,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "q E + q v × B − m v/τ = 0, with μ = q τ/m and α = μ B, solves to v_x = μ (E_x + α E_y)/(1+α²) and v_y = μ (E_y − α E_x)/(1+α²). Einstein's relation D = μ k_B T/q on μ and on μ/(1+α²), the same relation as be-70 and not re-proved here, gives D_⊥/D_∥ = 1/(1+ω_c² τ²) for E along x. The ratio is even in the sign of ω_c. Bohm's 1/16 equals this ratio only when α² = 15",
       "formula_latex": "D_\\perp/D_\\parallel = 1/(1+\\alpha^2)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4344,6 +4550,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateCrossFieldDiffusion in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.CrossFieldDiffusion.diffusion_ratio, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-123",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.CrossFieldDiffusion.diffusion_ratio",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4365,6 +4572,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "the CGL root ω² = (k_∥²/ρ) (B²/μ0 + p_⊥ − p_∥) is a hypothesis. It is negative iff p_∥ − p_⊥ > B²/μ0. With β = 2 μ0 p/B², the be-76 definition and not the solenoid hypotheses of beta_eq, the threshold is β_∥ − β_⊥ > 2. The CGL closure is not derived. be-76 does not prove this inequality",
       "formula_latex": "\\beta_\\parallel - \\beta_\\perp",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4377,6 +4585,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateFirehose in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.Firehose.firehose_threshold, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-124",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Firehose.firehose_threshold",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4398,6 +4607,7 @@
         "plasma"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "the mirror threshold β_⊥ (T_⊥/T_∥ − 1) > 1 is a hypothesis, equivalent to T_⊥/T_∥ − 1 > 1/β_⊥, with β = 2 μ0 p/B². A beta that omits the 2 replaces 1/β by 2/β. The temperature ratio is not the temperature difference. The kinetic integral is not evaluated. Not the loss cone and not a proof of be-76",
       "formula_latex": "\\beta_\\perp (T_\\perp/T_\\parallel - 1)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4410,6 +4620,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateMirrorInstability in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.MirrorInstability.mirror_threshold, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation. The threshold is a hypothesis. The kinetic integral is not evaluated.",
       "formalKey": "be-125",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.MirrorInstability.mirror_threshold",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4431,6 +4642,7 @@
         "mechanical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "For n fingers, overlap along x, gap g, and thickness h, both sidewalls give C = 2 n ε h x / g. Voltage-controlled coenergy (1/2) C V² has lateral force (1/2) V² dC/dx, so the sidewall 2 and the coenergy 1/2 cancel and F = n ε h V² / g. One sidewall leaves the 1/2. Fringe is neglected and the gap is fixed. Not the normal pull-in of be-79. A comb drive",
       "formula_latex": "F = n \\varepsilon h V^2 / g",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4443,6 +4655,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[force]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateCombDrive in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.CombDrive.force_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-126",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.CombDrive.force_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 1,
         "M": 1,
@@ -4464,6 +4677,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Weak-inversion current is exponential in the surface potential, and the gate and depletion capacitances divide that potential. One decade of drain current gives S = ln(10) (k_B T / e) (1 + C_d / C_ox), in volts per decade. e is the elementary charge. The ln is the natural logarithm. Dropping C_d is not the swing when C_d ≠ 0. Not the ideal diode of be-82. A MOSFET subthreshold swing",
       "formula_latex": "S = \\ln(10)\\,(k_B T / e)\\,(1 + C_d / C_{ox})",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4476,6 +4690,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^2 M T^-3 I^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateSubthresholdSwing in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.SubthresholdSwing.swing_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-127",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.SubthresholdSwing.swing_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -4497,6 +4712,7 @@
         "electrical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "An ideal boost converter in periodic steady state with continuous inductor current has V_out / V_in = 1 / (1 − D) for D ≠ 1. On, the inductor sees V_in. Off, it sees V_in − V_out. Volt-second balance sets the period average to zero. No real duty equals both this ratio and the buck ratio D. A boost converter",
       "formula_latex": "V_{out} / V_{in} = 1 / (1 - D)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4509,6 +4725,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateBoostConverter in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.BoostConverter.boost_ratio, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-128",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.BoostConverter.boost_ratio",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4530,6 +4747,7 @@
         "mechanical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The steady fin equation is θ'' = m² θ with m² = h P / (k A). A rectangle with w ≫ t has P/A = 2/t, so m = √(2 h / (k t)). An adiabatic tip and an imposed base temperature give η = tanh(m L) / (m L). One face is not that m. tanh is not 1, so this is not an infinite fin. Fin efficiency",
       "formula_latex": "m = \\sqrt{2 h / (k t)},\\quad \\eta = \\tanh(m L) / (m L)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4542,6 +4760,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateFinEfficiency in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The edge value is η. m is on the same result and is not a second edge. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.FinEfficiency.efficiency_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-129",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.FinEfficiency.efficiency_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4563,6 +4782,7 @@
         "electromagnetic"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "At the current that maximizes efficiency, η = (1 − T_c/T_h) (√(1 + Z T_m) − 1) / (√(1 + Z T_m) + T_c/T_h), with Z = S² / (R K) and T_m = (T_h + T_c) / 2. The hot-junction heat splits Joule heating in half. Matched load m = 1 is not stationary when Z T_m ≠ 0. The Carnot factor alone is not this efficiency. Thermoelectric generator efficiency. Figure of merit",
       "formula_latex": "\\eta = (1 - T_c/T_h) (\\sqrt{1 + Z T_m} - 1) / (\\sqrt{1 + Z T_m} + T_c/T_h)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4575,6 +4795,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateThermoelectricGenerator in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.ThermoelectricGenerator.efficiency_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. Not Carnot alone. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-130",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ThermoelectricGenerator.efficiency_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4596,6 +4817,7 @@
         "mechanical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "A sudden closure gives Δp = ρ c Δv. For a thin elastic pipe the wave speed is c = √(K/ρ) / √(1 + (K/E)(D/e_wall)), with K the fluid bulk modulus, E the wall modulus, D the diameter, and e_wall the wall thickness. ρ (Δv)² is not ρ c Δv when c ≠ Δv. Dropping the wall term is the rigid-pipe speed. Joukowsky. Water hammer",
       "formula_latex": "\\Delta p = \\rho c \\Delta v,\\quad c = \\sqrt{K/\\rho} / \\sqrt{1 + (K/E)(D/e_{wall})}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4608,6 +4830,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-1 M T^-2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateJoukowsky in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The edge value is Δp. The thin-wall speed is on the same result and is not a second edge. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.Joukowsky.joukowsky_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-131",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Joukowsky.joukowsky_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -1,
         "M": 1,
@@ -4629,6 +4852,7 @@
         "electrical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "A long coaxial pair, inner radius a, outer radius b, and insulator permittivity ε, has C' = 2 π ε / ln(b/a). Gauss's law gives the radial field, and the potential is the integral of 1/r. End fringe is neglected. Dropping 2 π is not this capacitance. Not a parallel-plate ε A/d. Coaxial. Coax",
       "formula_latex": "C' = 2 \\pi \\varepsilon / \\ln(b/a)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4641,6 +4865,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-3 M^-1 T^4 I^2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateCoaxialCapacitance in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.CoaxialCapacitance.capacitance_per_length, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-132",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.CoaxialCapacitance.capacitance_per_length",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -3,
         "M": -1,
@@ -4662,6 +4887,7 @@
         "dynamical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "For m ẍ + c ẋ + k x = 0, ζ = c / (2 √(k m)). The characteristic polynomial is s² + (c/m) s + k/m. The 2 is the binomial coefficient in 2 ζ ω with ω = √(k/m). For c ≥ 0 a zero discriminant is ζ = 1, so c_crit = 2 √(k m). Dropping the 2 is not this ratio. √(k/m) is not ζ. Damping ratio",
       "formula_latex": "\\zeta = c / (2 \\sqrt{k m})",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4674,6 +4900,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateDampingRatio in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.DampingRatio.damping_ratio, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-133",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.DampingRatio.damping_ratio",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4695,6 +4922,7 @@
         "quantum"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Quadratic magnons and one Bohr magneton per magnon give ΔM = μ_B ζ(3/2) (k_B T / (4 π D))^{3/2}. ζ(3/2) is the Bose integral and is not evaluated. g μ_B at g = 2 is not that moment. D = 2 J S a² and M(0) = μ_B S / a³ are the nested heisenberg_fraction object. Bloch law. Magnons",
       "formula_latex": "\\Delta M = \\mu_B \\zeta(3/2) \\left(k_B T / (4 \\pi D)\\right)^{3/2}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4707,6 +4935,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-1 I]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateBlochLaw in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.BlochLaw.bloch_law, kind bridge. heisenberg_fraction is nested and is not the formalRef. The catalog path passes the top-level theorem, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-134",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.BlochLaw.bloch_law",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -1,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4728,6 +4957,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Two spins, k³ = 3 π² n, and E = ℏ² k² / (2 m) give g(E) = (1/(2 π²)) (2 m / ℏ²)^{3/2} √E per volume per energy. One spin replaces 1/(2 π²) by 1/(4 π²). Not the Fermi wavevector of be-88. Density of states",
       "formula_latex": "g(E) = \\frac{1}{2\\pi^2}\\left(\\frac{2m}{\\hbar^2}\\right)^{3/2}\\sqrt{E}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4740,6 +4970,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-5 M^-1 T^2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateDensityOfStates3D in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.DensityOfStates3D.dos_3d, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-135",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.DensityOfStates3D.dos_3d",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -5,
         "M": -1,
@@ -4761,6 +4992,7 @@
         "quantum"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Two spins in the disk give g = m / (π ℏ²) per area, independent of energy. A valley factor other than 1 is not this density. Density of states",
       "formula_latex": "g = m / (\\pi \\hbar^2)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4773,6 +5005,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-4 M^-1 T^2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateDensityOfStates2D in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.DensityOfStates2D.dos_2d, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-136",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.DensityOfStates2D.dos_2d",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -4,
         "M": -1,
@@ -4794,6 +5027,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Poisson and δn = g(E_F) e φ give k_TF² = e² g(E_F) / ε0. For the parabolic gas g(E_F) = (3/2) n / E_F, so k_TF² = (e² / ε0) (3 n) / (2 E_F). e is the elementary charge. A flat density leaves the factor 1. Not the classical Debye length. Thomas–Fermi",
       "formula_latex": "k_{TF}^2 = (e^2 / \\varepsilon_0) (3 n) / (2 E_F)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4806,6 +5040,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateThomasFermi in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The edge value is k_TF². The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.ThomasFermi.thomas_fermi, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-137",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ThomasFermi.thomas_fermi",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -2,
         "M": 0,
@@ -4827,6 +5062,7 @@
         "electromagnetic"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Complete ionization and Boltzmann tails give V_bi = (k_B T / e) ln(N_A N_D / n_i²). e is the elementary charge. The product n_p N_A = n_i² is the be-99 conclusion as an input. Not the ideal diode of be-82. Built-in voltage. p–n junction",
       "formula_latex": "V_{bi} = (k_B T / e) \\ln(N_A N_D / n_i^2)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4839,6 +5075,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^2 M T^-3 I^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateBuiltinVoltage in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.BuiltinVoltage.builtin_voltage, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-138",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.BuiltinVoltage.builtin_voltage",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -4860,6 +5097,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "n = p on Boltzmann tails gives E_F − (E_c + E_v)/2 = (3/4) k_B T ln(m_h* / m_e*). The 3/4 is half of 3/2. Complete ionization gives E_c − E_F = k_B T ln(N_c / N_D). Dropping the 3/2 leaves 1/2. Not a Fermi–Dirac integral. Fermi level",
       "formula_latex": "E_F - (E_c + E_v)/2 = (3/4) k_B T \\ln(m_h^*/m_e^*),\\quad E_c - E_F = k_B T \\ln(N_c/N_D)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4872,6 +5110,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[energy]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateSemiconductorFermi in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The edge value is the intrinsic offset. The extrinsic energy is on the same result and is not a second edge. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.SemiconductorFermi.fermi_level, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-139",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.SemiconductorFermi.fermi_level",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -4893,6 +5132,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The orbit area steps by 1, so γ cancels and F = ℏ A / (2 π e), with Δ(1/B) = 1/F. e is the elementary charge. F has the dimension of a magnetic field. Dropping γ on one orbit is not a step of 1. Onsager. de Haas",
       "formula_latex": "F = \\hbar A / (2 \\pi e)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4905,6 +5145,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[M T^-2 I^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateOnsagerFrequency in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.OnsagerFrequency.onsager_frequency, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-140",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.OnsagerFrequency.onsager_frequency",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 1,
@@ -4926,6 +5167,7 @@
         "electromagnetic"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "I = I_c sin φ and V = (ℏ / (2 e)) dφ/dt. At φ = 0, cos φ = 1, so L_J = ℏ / (2 e I_c). Φ₀ = h / (2 e) and h = 2 π ℏ give L_J = Φ₀ / (2 π I_c). e is the elementary charge. A phase with cos φ ≠ 1 is not this inductance. Not the frequency of be-59. Josephson inductance",
       "formula_latex": "L_J = \\hbar / (2 e I_c)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4938,6 +5180,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^2 M T^-2 I^-2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateJosephsonInductance in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.JosephsonInductance.inductance_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-141",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.JosephsonInductance.inductance_eq",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 2,
         "M": 1,
@@ -4959,6 +5202,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The London line energy with the core cutoff ξ ≤ r ≤ λ gives B_c1 = (Φ₀ / (4 π λ²)) ln(λ/ξ), with Φ₀ = h / (2 e). e is the elementary charge. An additive constant under the logarithm changes the field and not the prefactor. Not be-96. Lower critical field",
       "formula_latex": "B_{c1} = (\\Phi_0 / (4 \\pi \\lambda^2)) \\ln(\\lambda / \\xi)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -4971,6 +5215,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[M T^-2 I^-1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateLowerCritical in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.LowerCritical.lower_critical, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-142",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.LowerCritical.lower_critical",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 1,
@@ -4992,6 +5237,7 @@
         "electromagnetic"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The cosine transform of exp(−t/τ) gives Re σ = σ₀ / (1 + ω² τ²), with σ₀ = n e² τ / m. e is the elementary charge. Dropping the DC 1 is not this conductivity. Not be-123. Drude. AC conductivity",
       "formula_latex": "\\mathrm{Re}\\,\\sigma = \\sigma_0 / (1 + \\omega^2 \\tau^2),\\quad \\sigma_0 = n e^2 \\tau / m",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5004,6 +5250,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-3 M^-1 T^3 I^2]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateAcDrude in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The edge value is Re σ. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.AcDrude.ac_drude, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-143",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.AcDrude.ac_drude",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -3,
         "M": -1,
@@ -5025,6 +5272,7 @@
         "quantum"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Independent Poisson processes give 1/τ = 1/τ₁ + 1/τ₂. One Drude factor ρ_i = C / τ_i makes ρ = ρ₁ + ρ₂. One lifetime is not the parallel sum. Not a collision integral. Matthiessen",
       "formula_latex": "1/\\tau = 1/\\tau_1 + 1/\\tau_2",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5037,6 +5285,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[time]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateMatthiessen in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The edge value is the parallel lifetime. The resistivity sum is on the same result and is not a second edge. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.Matthiessen.matthiessen, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-144",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Matthiessen.matthiessen",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -5058,6 +5307,7 @@
         "condensed"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The geometric series of bubbles gives χ = χ_P / (1 − I g(E_F)) for |I g(E_F)| < 1. The pole 1 − I g(E_F) = 0 is the same formula as I g(E_F) = 1. χ_P is be-94 and is not re-proved. The first two bubbles are not the closed form. Stoner",
       "formula_latex": "\\chi = \\chi_P / (1 - I g(E_F))",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5070,6 +5320,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateStoner in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.Stoner.stoner, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-145",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Stoner.stoner",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -5091,6 +5342,7 @@
         "electromagnetic"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The exponent 4 is a hypothesis. n_s/n = 1 − (T/T_c)^4, and the London depths of be-75, not re-proved, give λ(T) = λ(0) / √(1 − (T/T_c)^4). The exponent 2 is not 4 when the reduced temperature is neither 0 nor 1. Not a BCS gap and not a second proof of be-75. Gorter–Casimir. Two-fluid",
       "formula_latex": "n_s/n = 1 - (T/T_c)^4",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5103,6 +5355,7 @@
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
       "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateGorterCasimir in the catalog record (data/bridge-catalog.json). The edge value is n_s/n. λ(T) is on the same result and is not a second edge. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.GorterCasimir.gorter_casimir, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation.",
       "formalKey": "be-146",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.GorterCasimir.gorter_casimir",
       "dimension": {
         "L": 0,
         "M": 0,
@@ -5124,6 +5377,7 @@
         "thermal"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "k = A exp(−Ea/(R T)) with R = N_A k_B is the molecular factor exp(−ε/(k_B T)) at ε = Ea/N_A. The prefactor A is temperature-independent. Not the Eyring identification of A. Arrhenius. Rate constant",
       "formula_latex": "k = A \\exp(-E_a/(R T)),\\quad R = N_A k_B",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5144,7 +5398,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-147"
+      "formalKey": "be-147",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Arrhenius.arrhenius_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 148,
@@ -5157,13 +5412,14 @@
         "chemical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
-      "context": "k = (k_B T/h) exp(−ΔG‡/(k_B T)). The molar form calls Arrhenius at R = N_A k_B. The logarithmic derivative is Ea = ΔH‡ + R T, and that Ea is not the constant in k = A exp(−Ea/(R T)) at A = (k_B T/h) exp(ΔS‡/R): those substitutions differ by exp(−1). The transmission coefficient is 1. Eyring. Transition state",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
+      "context": "In quasi-equilibrium with the activated complex, ΔG‡ = −k_B T ln K‡ and the rate is ν q(ν) K‡ with the reaction-coordinate partition function q(ν) = 1/(1 − exp(−hν/(k_B T))). As ν → 0, ν q(ν) → k_B T/h, so k = (k_B T/h) exp(−ΔG‡/(k_B T)). The molar form calls Arrhenius at R = N_A k_B. The logarithmic derivative is Ea = ΔH‡ + R T, and that Ea is not the constant in k = A exp(−Ea/(R T)) at A = (k_B T/h) exp(ΔS‡/R): those substitutions differ by exp(−1). The transmission coefficient is 1. Eyring. Transition state",
       "formula_latex": "k = (k_B T/h) \\exp(-\\Delta G^\\ddagger/(k_B T))",
       "source_part": "III",
       "source_section": "Thermal catalog (be-148) — established textbook relation, PhysJS.Eyring.eyring_eq",
       "known_issues": [],
       "references": [
-        "The molar form calls PhysJS.Arrhenius.arrhenius_eq. It is not a second proof of be-147."
+        "The molar form calls PhysJS.Arrhenius.molar_exponent, the R = N_A k_B step of PhysJS.Arrhenius.arrhenius_eq. It is not a second proof of be-147. The classical limit ν q(ν) → k_B T/h is classical_limit."
       ],
       "dependencies": [],
       "dimensional_signature": "[frequency]",
@@ -5177,7 +5433,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-148"
+      "formalKey": "be-148",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Eyring.eyring_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 149,
@@ -5190,13 +5447,14 @@
         "thermodynamic"
       ],
       "status": "established",
-      "context": "equilibrium_log is the Gibbs isotherm, so ln K = −ΔG°/(R T). At ΔG° = ΔH° − T ΔS° with both constant, d ln K/dT = ΔH°/(R T²). Not a second proof of be-150 and not a van 't Hoff plot. van 't Hoff",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
+      "context": "At every temperature, ideal chemical potentials μ_i = μ_i° + R T ln a_i at equilibrium Σ ν_i μ_i = 0 give the Gibbs isotherm ln K = −ΔG°/(R T), and ΔG° = ΔH° − T ΔS° with both constant gives ln K = −ΔH°/(R T) + ΔS°/R, so d ln K/dT = ΔH°/(R T²). Not a second proof of be-150 and not a van 't Hoff plot. van 't Hoff",
       "formula_latex": "\\frac{d \\ln K}{dT} = \\frac{\\Delta H^\\circ}{R T^2}",
       "source_part": "III",
       "source_section": "Thermal catalog (be-149) — established textbook relation, PhysJS.VanTHoff.vant_hoff",
       "known_issues": [],
       "references": [
-        "equilibrium_log is PhysJS.GibbsIsotherm.gibbs_eq. ΔH° and ΔS° are constant."
+        "equilibrium_log is PhysJS.GibbsIsotherm.gibbs_eq at each temperature. ΔH° and ΔS° are constant. The integrated ln K is derived, not a hypothesis."
       ],
       "dependencies": [],
       "dimensional_signature": "[Theta^-1]",
@@ -5210,7 +5468,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-149"
+      "formalKey": "be-149",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.VanTHoff.vant_hoff"
     },
     {
       "id": 150,
@@ -5223,6 +5482,7 @@
         "chemical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "Σ ν_i μ_i = 0 with μ_i = μ_i° + R T ln a_i gives ΔG° = −R T ln K for K > 0 and T ≠ 0. Not an activity model. Gibbs. Equilibrium",
       "formula_latex": "\\Delta G^\\circ = -R T \\ln K",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5243,7 +5503,8 @@
         "N": -1,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-150"
+      "formalKey": "be-150",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.GibbsIsotherm.gibbs_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 151,
@@ -5256,13 +5517,14 @@
         "thermodynamic"
       ],
       "status": "established",
-      "context": "The cell standard state is the Gibbs isotherm, and ΔG = −n F E with F = N_A e gives E = E° − (R T/(n F)) ln Q. e is the elementary charge. The same voltage is E° − (k_B T/(n e)) ln Q. Not a second proof of be-150. Nernst",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
+      "context": "Ideal activities μ_i = μ_i° + R T ln a_i sum to ΔG = ΔG° + R T ln Q, and ΔG = −n F E, ΔG° = −n F E° with F = N_A e give E = E° − (R T/(n F)) ln Q. The cell standard state is the Gibbs isotherm. e is the elementary charge. The same voltage is E° − (k_B T/(n e)) ln Q. Not a second proof of be-150. Nernst",
       "formula_latex": "E = E^\\circ - (R T/(n F)) \\ln Q,\\quad F = N_A e",
       "source_part": "III",
       "source_section": "Thermal catalog (be-151) — established textbook relation, PhysJS.NernstGibbs.nernst_eq",
       "known_issues": [],
       "references": [
-        "The standard state is PhysJS.GibbsIsotherm.gibbs_eq. ΔG = −n F E is on the same result."
+        "ΔG = ΔG° + R T ln Q is derived from the ideal activities (reaction_gibbs). The standard state is PhysJS.GibbsIsotherm.gibbs_eq. ΔG = −n F E is on the same result."
       ],
       "dependencies": [],
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^2 M T^-3 I^-1]",
@@ -5276,7 +5538,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-151"
+      "formalKey": "be-151",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.NernstGibbs.nernst_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 152,
@@ -5289,6 +5552,7 @@
         "phase"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "ideal_vapor_slope calls the Clapeyron slope, be-71, and substitutes Δv = R T/P. Constant latent heat integrates to ln(P2/P1) = −(ΔH/R)(1/T2 − 1/T1). Both temperatures are positive. Not a second proof of be-71. A separate liquid volume is not this row. Clausius–Clapeyron",
       "formula_latex": "\\ln(P_2/P_1) = -(\\Delta H/R)(1/T_2 - 1/T_1)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5309,7 +5573,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-152"
+      "formalKey": "be-152",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ClausiusClapeyron.integrated_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 153,
@@ -5322,6 +5587,7 @@
         "phase"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The Gibbs isotherm on the ideal mixture and on the pure liquid gives P = x P*. The liquid activity is the mole fraction and the vapor activity is P/P°. Not a second proof of be-150. A nonideal activity is not this row. Raoult",
       "formula_latex": "P = x P^*",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5342,7 +5608,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-153"
+      "formalKey": "be-153",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Raoult.raoult_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 154,
@@ -5355,13 +5622,14 @@
         "fluid"
       ],
       "status": "established",
-      "context": "The ratio identity Pr = ν/α with ν = μ/ρ and α = k/(ρ c_p) is the product Pr k = μ c_p. Not a heat-transfer correlation and not the Reynolds analogy of be-86. Prandtl",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
+      "context": "One Fourier mode decays at ν q² under momentum diffusion and at α q² under heat conduction, so the rate ratio is Pr = ν/α with ν = μ/ρ and α = k/(ρ c_p), and Pr k = μ c_p. Not a heat-transfer correlation and not the Reynolds analogy of be-86. Prandtl",
       "formula_latex": "\\mathrm{Pr} = \\mu c_p / k",
       "source_part": "III",
       "source_section": "Thermal catalog (be-154) — established textbook relation, PhysJS.Prandtl.prandtl_eq",
       "known_issues": [],
       "references": [
-        "The kinematic viscosity and the thermal diffusivity are the hypotheses of PhysJS.Prandtl.prandtl_eq."
+        "The decay rates are PhysJS.DiffusionMode.mode_solves_iff. ν = μ/ρ and α = k/(ρ c_p) are definitions in PhysJS.Prandtl.prandtl_eq."
       ],
       "dependencies": [],
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
@@ -5375,7 +5643,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-154"
+      "formalKey": "be-154",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Prandtl.prandtl_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 155,
@@ -5388,13 +5657,14 @@
         "inertial"
       ],
       "status": "established",
-      "context": "Inertial flux over viscous flux is Re = (ρ v²)/(μ v/L) = v L/ν with ν = μ/ρ, so Re μ = ρ v L. Not a friction correlation and not the pipe factor of be-77. Reynolds number",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
+      "context": "A mode of wavenumber 1/L carried at speed v under ∂u/∂t + v ∂u/∂x = ν ∂²u/∂x² decays at the viscous rate ν/L². The viscous time over the advection time L/v is Re = v L/ν with ν = μ/ρ, so Re μ = ρ v L. Not a friction correlation and not the pipe factor of be-77. Reynolds number",
       "formula_latex": "\\mathrm{Re} = \\rho v L / \\mu",
       "source_part": "III",
       "source_section": "Thermal catalog (be-155) — established textbook relation, PhysJS.ReynoldsNumber.reynolds_eq",
       "known_issues": [],
       "references": [
-        "The flux ratio is the hypothesis of PhysJS.ReynoldsNumber.reynolds_eq."
+        "The viscous decay rate is PhysJS.DiffusionMode.mode_solves_iff. The time ratio is PhysJS.ReynoldsNumber.reynolds_eq."
       ],
       "dependencies": [],
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
@@ -5408,7 +5678,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-155"
+      "formalKey": "be-155",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.ReynoldsNumber.reynolds_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 156,
@@ -5421,13 +5692,14 @@
         "conduction"
       ],
       "status": "established",
-      "context": "With L_c = V/A, Bi = (L_c/k)/(1/h) = h V/(k A), so Bi k = h L_c. Not a lumped-capacitance criterion. Biot",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
+      "context": "A plane wall in steady conduction with a convective face −k T'(L) = h (T(L) − T∞) has internal over external temperature drop h L/k. With L_c = V/A that is Bi = h V/(k A), so Bi k = h L_c. Not a lumped-capacitance criterion. Biot",
       "formula_latex": "\\mathrm{Bi} = h L_c / k",
       "source_part": "III",
       "source_section": "Thermal catalog (be-156) — established textbook relation, PhysJS.Biot.biot_eq",
       "known_issues": [],
       "references": [
-        "L_c = V/A is the hypothesis of PhysJS.Biot.biot_eq. The volume form is the same number."
+        "The linear steady profile is PhysJS.SteadyProfile.linear_profile. L_c = V/A names the wall thickness in PhysJS.Biot.biot_eq. The volume form is the same number."
       ],
       "dependencies": [],
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
@@ -5441,7 +5713,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-156"
+      "formalKey": "be-156",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Biot.biot_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 157,
@@ -5454,13 +5727,14 @@
         "convection"
       ],
       "status": "established",
-      "context": "h = k (∂T/∂n)/ΔT makes Nu = h L/k equal to L (∂T/∂n)/ΔT, so Nu k = h L. Not a correlation for Nu. Nusselt",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
+      "context": "h (T_w − T∞) = −k T'(0) at the wall makes Nu = h L/k the dimensionless wall gradient L (−T'(0))/(T_w − T∞), so Nu k = h L, and a layer in pure steady conduction has Nu = 1. Not a correlation for Nu. Nusselt",
       "formula_latex": "\\mathrm{Nu} = h L / k",
       "source_part": "III",
       "source_section": "Thermal catalog (be-157) — established textbook relation, PhysJS.Nusselt.nusselt_eq",
       "known_issues": [],
       "references": [
-        "The wall gradient is the hypothesis of PhysJS.Nusselt.nusselt_eq."
+        "The wall condition defines h in PhysJS.Nusselt.nusselt_eq. Nu = 1 for pure conduction uses PhysJS.SteadyProfile.slab_slope."
       ],
       "dependencies": [],
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
@@ -5474,7 +5748,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-157"
+      "formalKey": "be-157",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Nusselt.nusselt_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 158,
@@ -5487,13 +5762,14 @@
         "diffusion"
       ],
       "status": "established",
-      "context": "Sc = ν/D with ν = μ/ρ is Sc ρ D = μ, and Le = α/D = Sc/Pr once Pr = ν/α. Not a mass-transfer correlation. Schmidt. Lewis",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
+      "context": "One Fourier mode decays at ν q², α q² and D q² under momentum, heat and mass diffusion, so Sc = ν/D with ν = μ/ρ is Sc ρ D = μ, and Le = α/D = Sc/Pr. Not a mass-transfer correlation. Schmidt. Lewis",
       "formula_latex": "\\mathrm{Sc} = \\mu/(\\rho D)",
       "source_part": "III",
       "source_section": "Thermal catalog (be-158) — established textbook relation, PhysJS.Schmidt.schmidt_eq",
       "known_issues": [],
       "references": [
-        "Le = Sc/Pr is the second conjunct of PhysJS.Schmidt.schmidt_eq and is not a second edge."
+        "Le = Sc/Pr is the second conjunct of PhysJS.Schmidt.schmidt_eq and is not a second edge. The decay rates are PhysJS.DiffusionMode.mode_solves_iff."
       ],
       "dependencies": [],
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
@@ -5507,7 +5783,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-158"
+      "formalKey": "be-158",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Schmidt.schmidt_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 159,
@@ -5520,13 +5797,14 @@
         "convection"
       ],
       "status": "established",
-      "context": "k_m = D (∂c/∂n)/Δc makes Sh = k_m L/D equal to L (∂c/∂n)/Δc, so Sh D = k_m L. Not a correlation for Sh. Sherwood",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
+      "context": "k_m (c_w − c∞) = −D c'(0) at the wall makes Sh = k_m L/D the dimensionless wall gradient L (−c'(0))/(c_w − c∞), so Sh D = k_m L, and a layer in pure steady diffusion has Sh = 1. Not a correlation for Sh. Sherwood",
       "formula_latex": "\\mathrm{Sh} = k_m L / D",
       "source_part": "III",
       "source_section": "Thermal catalog (be-159) — established textbook relation, PhysJS.Sherwood.sherwood_eq",
       "known_issues": [],
       "references": [
-        "The wall gradient of concentration is the hypothesis of PhysJS.Sherwood.sherwood_eq."
+        "The wall condition defines k_m in PhysJS.Sherwood.sherwood_eq. Sh = 1 for pure diffusion uses PhysJS.SteadyProfile.slab_slope."
       ],
       "dependencies": [],
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
@@ -5540,7 +5818,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-159"
+      "formalKey": "be-159",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Sherwood.sherwood_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 160,
@@ -5553,6 +5832,7 @@
         "thermal"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "A constant flux q = −k dT/dx integrates to q L = −k (T(L) − T(0)). A temperature-dependent conductivity is not this row. Fourier. Conduction",
       "formula_latex": "q L = -k (T(L) - T(0))",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5573,7 +5853,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-160"
+      "formalKey": "be-160",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.FourierConduction.fourier_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 161,
@@ -5586,6 +5867,7 @@
         "thermal"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "ρ c V dθ/dt = −h A θ integrates to θ(t) = θ(0) exp(−t/τ) with τ = ρ c V/(h A). Radiation in T^4 is not this row. Newton. Lumped cooling",
       "formula_latex": "\\theta(t) = \\theta(0) \\exp(-t/\\tau),\\quad \\tau = \\rho c V/(h A)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5606,7 +5888,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-161"
+      "formalKey": "be-161",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.NewtonCooling.newton_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 162,
@@ -5619,6 +5902,7 @@
         "mechanical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "The cold-air isentropic cycle at constant γ > 1 gives η = 1 − r^(1−γ). A temperature-dependent heat capacity is not this row. Otto",
       "formula_latex": "\\eta = 1 - r^{1-\\gamma}",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5639,7 +5923,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-162"
+      "formalKey": "be-162",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Otto.otto_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 163,
@@ -5652,13 +5937,14 @@
         "fluid"
       ],
       "status": "established",
-      "context": "The enthalpy differential dh = c_p dT + (v − T (∂v/∂T)_p) dP is a hypothesis. It gives μ_JT c_p = T (∂v/∂T)_p − v, and the ideal-gas bracket v = R T/P vanishes. Not a measured inversion curve. Joule–Thomson",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
+      "context": "From the second-virial Gibbs energy g = φ(T) + R T ln P + B(T) P, the enthalpy slope (∂h/∂P)_T = v − T (∂v/∂T)_P = B − T B' is derived, so μ_JT c_p = T (∂v/∂T)_p − v = T B' − B, an ideal gas (B = 0) has μ_JT = 0, and B = b − a/(R T) gives μ_JT c_p = 2a/(R T) − b. Not a measured inversion curve. Joule–Thomson",
       "formula_latex": "\\mu_{JT} c_p = T (\\partial v/\\partial T)_p - v",
       "source_part": "III",
       "source_section": "Thermal catalog (be-163) — established textbook relation, PhysJS.JouleThomson.joule_thomson_eq",
       "known_issues": [],
       "references": [
-        "The enthalpy differential is a hypothesis of PhysJS.JouleThomson.joule_thomson_eq."
+        "The enthalpy slope is derived from the second-virial Gibbs energy in PhysJS.JouleThomson.joule_thomson_eq. The van der Waals form is virial_inversion."
       ],
       "dependencies": [],
       "dimensional_signature": "[L M^-1 T^2 Theta]",
@@ -5672,7 +5958,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-163"
+      "formalKey": "be-163",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.JouleThomson.joule_thomson_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 164,
@@ -5685,13 +5972,14 @@
         "thermal"
       ],
       "status": "established",
-      "context": "The Bose factor 1/(exp(x) − 1) = Σ_{n≥1} exp(−n x) is proved. The mode density 8 π ν²/c³, two polarizations, is a hypothesis. Their product is u (exp(hν/kT) − 1) c³ = 8 π h ν³. The frequency integral is be-165. Planck",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
+      "context": "The Boltzmann mean energy of the levels n h ν is h ν/(exp(x) − 1) with x = h ν/(k_B T), and the Bose factor 1/(exp(x) − 1) = Σ_{n≥1} exp(−n x) is proved. The mode density 8 π ν²/c³, two polarizations, is a hypothesis. Their product is u (exp(hν/kT) − 1) c³ = 8 π h ν³. The frequency integral is be-165. Planck",
       "formula_latex": "u (\\exp(h\\nu/k_B T) - 1) c^3 = 8 \\pi h \\nu^3",
       "source_part": "III",
       "source_section": "Thermal catalog (be-164) — established textbook relation, PhysJS.PlanckSpectrum.planck_eq",
       "known_issues": [],
       "references": [
-        "The mode density, two polarizations, is a hypothesis of PhysJS.PlanckSpectrum.planck_eq."
+        "The mode density, two polarizations, is a hypothesis of PhysJS.PlanckSpectrum.planck_eq. The mean energy per mode is derived (mean_energy)."
       ],
       "dependencies": [],
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-1 M T^-1]",
@@ -5705,7 +5993,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-164"
+      "formalKey": "be-164",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.PlanckSpectrum.planck_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 165,
@@ -5718,6 +6007,7 @@
         "quantum"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "∫_0^∞ x³/(exp(x) − 1) dx = π⁴/15 from Σ n^{−4} = π⁴/90 and Γ(4) = 6. The hemisphere integrals give the factor c/4. With h = 2 π ℏ, σ = π² k_B⁴/(60 ℏ³ c²) = 2 π⁵ k_B⁴/(15 h³ c²). The mode density 8π is the hypothesis of be-164. Not a radiometer measurement. Stefan–Boltzmann",
       "formula_latex": "\\sigma = \\pi^2 k_B^4 / (60 \\hbar^3 c^2)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5738,7 +6028,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-165"
+      "formalKey": "be-165",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.StefanBoltzmann.stefan_boltzmann_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 166,
@@ -5751,6 +6042,7 @@
         "radiation"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "spectral(x) = x⁵/(exp(x) − 1) has derivative zero for x > 0 exactly when 5 − x = 5 exp(−x). That equation has a unique positive root and the root lies in (4, 5). The decimal is not evaluated. x = 0 is an extraneous root. The displacement constant is b k_B x = h c. Wien",
       "formula_latex": "b k_B x = h c",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5771,7 +6063,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-166"
+      "formalKey": "be-166",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.WienDisplacement.wien_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 167,
@@ -5784,6 +6077,7 @@
         "statistical"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "n_Q = λ_T^{−3} uses the thermal de Broglie wavelength, be-12. Stirling ln N! = N ln N − N is a hypothesis, and U = (3/2) N k_B T is equipartition. They give S = N k_B (ln(n_Q/n) + 5/2). Not a second proof of be-12 and not the Stirling series. Sackur–Tetrode",
       "formula_latex": "S = N k_B (\\ln(n_Q/n) + 5/2)",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5804,7 +6098,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-167"
+      "formalKey": "be-167",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.SackurTetrode.sackur_tetrode"
     },
     {
       "id": 168,
@@ -5817,17 +6112,18 @@
         "quantum"
       ],
       "status": "established",
-      "context": "The thermal factor is the thermal de Broglie wavelength, so K = (2 π m k_B T/h²)^{3/2} exp(−I/(k_B T)). The electron weight 2 and the internal partition functions are not in this statement. Not a second proof of be-12. Saha",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
+      "context": "The ionization equilibrium μ_A = μ₊ + μ_e of classical ideal gases with μ_i = E_i + k_B T ln(n_i λ_i³/g_i) gives n₊ n_e/n_A = (g₊ g_e/g_A) λ_e^{−3} exp(−I/(k_B T)). The thermal factor is the thermal de Broglie wavelength, and at g₊ g_e = g_A that is K = (2 π m k_B T/h²)^{3/2} exp(−I/(k_B T)). The electron weight 2 and the internal partition functions enter only as the weights g_i and are not in the catalogued K. Not a second proof of be-12. Saha",
       "formula_latex": "K = (2\\pi m k_B T/h^2)^{3/2} \\exp(-I/(k_B T))",
       "source_part": "III",
       "source_section": "Thermal catalog (be-168) — established textbook relation, PhysJS.Saha.saha_eq",
       "known_issues": [],
       "references": [
-        "The thermal factor is PhysJS.ThermalDeBroglie.wavelength_eq, be-12."
+        "The mass action is derived from ideal-gas chemical potentials with statistical weights in PhysJS.Saha.saha_eq. The thermal factor is PhysJS.ThermalDeBroglie.wavelength_eq, be-12. The catalogued K is the case g₊ g_e = g_A."
       ],
       "dependencies": [],
       "dimensional_signature": "[L^-3]",
-      "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateSaha from the catalog record. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.Saha.saha_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation. Type cross-domain. Derived from be-12. The electron spin weight 2 and the internal partition functions are not in this statement. Multiplying by 2 is a different number. Not a second proof of be-12. Scope: The electron statistical weight 2 is not in this statement.",
+      "notes": "Closed-form evaluator evaluateSaha from the catalog record. The overlay formalRef is PhysJS.Saha.saha_eq, kind bridge. The catalog path passes it, so catalog evidence and edge evidence are formally-proved. The edge confidence stays established. No confrontation. Type cross-domain. Derived from be-12. The electron spin weight 2 and the internal partition functions are not in the catalogued K: the theorem carries them as the weights g_i, and K is its case g₊ g_e = g_A. Multiplying K by 2 is a different number. Not a second proof of be-12. Scope: The electron statistical weight 2 is not in this statement.",
       "dimension": {
         "L": -3,
         "M": 0,
@@ -5837,7 +6133,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-168"
+      "formalKey": "be-168",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.Saha.saha_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 169,
@@ -5850,6 +6147,7 @@
         "emission"
       ],
       "status": "established",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
       "context": "∫_a^∞ exp(−c x) dx = exp(−c a)/c is proved. The current is the hypothesis 4 π m e/h³ times one factor k_B T from each tail, so J h³ exp(φ/(k_B T)) = 4 π m e k_B² T². Here e is the elementary charge. The Boltzmann tail replaces Fermi–Dirac and the reflection coefficient is 1. Richardson–Dushman",
       "formula_latex": "J h^3 \\exp(\\varphi/(k_B T)) = 4 \\pi m e k_B^2 T^2",
       "source_part": "III",
@@ -5870,7 +6168,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-169"
+      "formalKey": "be-169",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.RichardsonDushman.richardson_eq"
     },
     {
       "id": 170,
@@ -5883,13 +6182,14 @@
         "transport"
       ],
       "status": "established",
-      "context": "The mixed partials of Φ = ½ L11 X1² + L12 X1 X2 + ½ L22 X2² are both L12, so L12 = L21. thermoelectric_instance applies the Kelvin–Peltier relation, be-73, and does not re-prove Π = S T. An antisymmetric cross term produces no entropy. The magnetic case L12(B) = L21(−B) is not this row. Onsager",
+      "proofStatus": "full",
+      "context": "Detailed balance π_i W_ij = π_j W_ji of the jump rates makes the kinetic coefficients, the initial slopes of the equilibrium cross-correlations, symmetric, so L12 = L21. A three-state cycle without detailed balance breaks the symmetry. The mixed partials of Φ = ½ L11 X1² + L12 X1 X2 + ½ L22 X2² are both L12. thermoelectric_instance applies the Kelvin–Peltier relation, be-73, and does not re-prove Π = S T. An antisymmetric cross term produces no entropy. The magnetic case L12(B) = L21(−B) is not this row. Onsager",
       "formula_latex": "L_{12} = L_{21}",
       "source_part": "III",
       "source_section": "Thermal catalog (be-170) — established textbook relation, PhysJS.OnsagerReciprocity.onsager_eq",
       "known_issues": [],
       "references": [
-        "thermoelectric_instance applies PhysJS.KelvinRelation.peltier_eq, be-73."
+        "thermoelectric_instance applies PhysJS.KelvinRelation.peltier_eq, be-73. The symmetry is derived from detailed balance, and not_without_balance is the failing control."
       ],
       "dependencies": [],
       "dimensional_signature": "[1]",
@@ -5903,7 +6203,8 @@
         "N": 0,
         "J": 0
       },
-      "formalKey": "be-170"
+      "formalKey": "be-170",
+      "theorem": "PhysJS.OnsagerReciprocity.onsager_eq"
     }
   ],
   "relations": [
@@ -5921,7 +6222,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(relaxation-rate) and\n      relaxation-rate >= 0 and\n      isFinite(superposition-extent) and\n      superposition-extent > 0 and\n      isFinite(thermal-de-broglie-wavelength) and\n      thermal-de-broglie-wavelength > 0",
-      "domain": "γ_relax ≥ 0, Δx > 0, λ_T > 0",
       "citation": "Caldeira & Leggett 1983 Physica A 121:587; Zurek 1991 Phys. Today 44(10):36",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -5945,7 +6245,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(mass) and\n      mass > 0 and\n      isFinite(temperature) and\n      temperature > 0",
-      "domain": "m > 0 and T > 0 (massive particle, finite temperature)",
       "citation": "Pathria 2011 Statistical Mechanics §7.1; de Broglie 1924",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -5971,7 +6270,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(temperature) and temperature >= 0",
-      "domain": "T ≥ 0 and finite (thermodynamic temperature)",
       "citation": "Landauer 1961 IBM JRD 5:183",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6004,7 +6302,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(mass) and\n      mass > 0 and\n      isFinite(near-radius) and\n      near-radius > 0 and\n      isFinite(far-radius) and\n      far-radius >= near-radius",
-      "domain": "M > 0 and 0 < R_near ≤ R_far (weak-field ray geometry)",
       "citation": "Shapiro 1964 PRL 13:789",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6031,7 +6328,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(mass) and mass > 0",
-      "domain": "M > 0 and finite (positive black-hole mass)",
       "citation": "Hawking 1975 CMP 43:199",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6052,7 +6348,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(schwarzschild-radius) and schwarzschild-radius > 0",
-      "domain": "r_s > 0 and finite",
       "citation": "Hawking 1975 CMP 43:199 (r_s parameterization)",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6081,7 +6376,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(mass) and\n      mass > 0 and\n      isFinite(impact-parameter) and\n      impact-parameter > 0 and\n      impact-parameter >= (10 * 2 * G * mass) / (c * c)",
-      "domain": "M > 0, b > 0, and weak field b ≥ 10·r_s",
       "citation": "Dyson, Eddington & Davidson 1920 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 220:291",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6112,7 +6406,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(mass) and\n      mass > 0 and\n      isFinite(semi-major-axis) and\n      semi-major-axis > 0 and\n      isFinite(eccentricity) and\n      eccentricity >= 0 and\n      eccentricity < 1 and\n      semi-major-axis * (1 - eccentricity) >= (10 * 2 * G * mass) / (c * c)",
-      "domain": "M > 0, a > 0, 0 ≤ e < 1 (bound elliptical orbit); weak field a(1−e) ≥ 10·r_s",
       "citation": "Einstein 1915 Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 831",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6135,7 +6428,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(mass) and mass > 0",
-      "domain": "M > 0 and finite",
       "confidence": "established",
       "citation": "Schwarzschild 1916; Carroll 2004 Spacetime and Geometry §5.4",
       "reference": {
@@ -6157,7 +6449,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(minimal-surface-area) and\n      minimal-surface-area >= 0",
-      "domain": "A ≥ 0 and finite (minimal-surface area)",
       "citation": "Ryu & Takayanagi 2006 PRL 96:181602",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6180,7 +6471,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(mass-density) and\n      mass-density >= 0 and\n      isFinite(critical-density) and\n      critical-density > 0 and\n      isFinite(rescaled-cosmological-constant)",
-      "domain": "ρ ≥ 0, ρ_crit > 0, Λ finite (all SI)",
       "citation": "Ashtekar, Pawlowski & Singh 2006 PRD 74:084003",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6201,7 +6491,6 @@
       "sources": [],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "true",
-      "domain": "universal constant — no inputs (vacuously valid)",
       "citation": "Kovtun, Son & Starinets 2005 PRL 94:111601",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {},
@@ -6220,7 +6509,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(mass) and mass > 0",
-      "domain": "m > 0 and finite (object mass)",
       "citation": "Ghirardi, Rimini & Weber 1986 PRD 34:470",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6243,7 +6531,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(gauge-coupling) and\n      isFinite(color-number) and\n      color-number > 0 and\n      isFinite(flavor-number) and\n      flavor-number >= 0",
-      "domain": "g finite, N_c > 0, N_f ≥ 0",
       "citation": "Gross & Wilczek 1973 PRL 30:1343; Politzer 1973 PRL 30:1346",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6268,7 +6555,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(mass-density) and\n      mass-density >= 0 and\n      isFinite(brane-tension) and\n      brane-tension > 0 and\n      isFinite(rescaled-cosmological-constant)",
-      "domain": "ρ ≥ 0, σ > 0, Λ finite (all SI)",
       "citation": "Randall & Sundrum 1999 PRL 83:4690; Binétruy et al. 2000 PLB 477:285",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6303,7 +6589,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(relaxation-rate) and\n      relaxation-rate >= 0 and\n      isFinite(system-environment-coupling) and\n      isFinite(reference-coupling) and\n      reference-coupling > 0",
-      "domain": "γ_0 ≥ 0, λ finite, λ_0 > 0",
       "citation": "Caldeira & Leggett 1983 Physica A 121:587; Lindblad 1976 CMP 48:119",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6327,7 +6612,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(cosmological-constant-curvature) and\n      isFinite(stress-energy-trace)",
-      "domain": "Λ and T finite (all SI)",
       "citation": "Jacobson 1995 PRL 75:1260; MTW Gravitation §17.4",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6350,7 +6634,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(model-a-mobility) and\n      model-a-mobility > 0 and\n      isFinite(time) and\n      time > 0",
-      "domain": "Γ > 0 and t > 0 (all SI)",
       "citation": "Kawasaki & Gunton 1976 PRA 13:2294; Hohenberg & Halperin 1977 RMP 49:435",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6373,7 +6656,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(einstein-coupling-prefactor-squared) and\n      isFinite(torsion-contraction-scalar) and\n      torsion-contraction-scalar >= 0",
-      "domain": "prefactor finite, torsion contraction ≥ 0 (sum of squares)",
       "citation": "Hehl et al. 1976 RMP 48:393; Cartan 1922 C. R. Acad. Sci. 174:593",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6396,7 +6678,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(yukawa-coupling) and isFinite(vacuum-expectation-value)",
-      "domain": "g_dark and v_dark finite",
       "citation": "Peskin & Schroeder 1995 QFT §20.1",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6418,7 +6699,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(cosmological-constant-curvature) and\n      cosmological-constant-curvature >= 0",
-      "domain": "Λ ≥ 0 and finite (m⁻²)",
       "citation": "Carroll 2001 Living Rev. Relativity 4:1; Planck 2020 A&A 641:A6",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6441,7 +6721,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(area-law-coefficient) and\n      isFinite(boundary-length) and\n      boundary-length >= 0 and\n      isFinite(topological-entanglement-entropy)",
-      "domain": "α finite, L ≥ 0, γ finite",
       "citation": "Kitaev & Preskill 2006 PRL 96:110404; Levin & Wen 2006 PRL 96:110405",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6468,7 +6747,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(residual-resistivity) and\n      residual-resistivity >= 0 and\n      isFinite(effective-mass) and\n      effective-mass > 0 and\n      isFinite(carrier-density) and\n      carrier-density > 0 and\n      isFinite(temperature) and\n      temperature >= 0 and\n      isFinite(syk-coefficient)",
-      "domain": "ρ_0 ≥ 0, m* > 0, n_e > 0, T ≥ 0, α_SYK finite",
       "citation": "Sachdev & Ye 1993 PRL 70:3339; Hartnoll 2015 Nature Phys. 11:54",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6494,7 +6772,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(donor-acceptor-distance) and\n      donor-acceptor-distance > 0 and\n      isFinite(foerster-radius) and\n      foerster-radius > 0",
-      "domain": "R > 0 and R_0 > 0",
       "citation": "Förster 1948 Ann. Phys. 437:55; Lakowicz 2006 Princ. Fluoresc. Spectrosc. Ch.13",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6517,7 +6794,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "not (not isFinite((conditional-probability)) or (conditional-probability) < 0 or (conditional-probability) > 1) and not (not isFinite((marginal-probability)) or (marginal-probability) < 0 or (marginal-probability) > 1) and not ((conditional-probability) > 0 and (marginal-probability) == 0)",
-      "domain": "p_cond, p_marg ∈ [0,1]; not (p_cond>0 and p_marg=0) (KL singularity)",
       "citation": "Tononi 2008 Biol. Bull. 215:216; Oizumi, Albantakis & Tononi 2014 PLoS Comput. Biol. 10:e1003588",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6543,7 +6819,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(attempt-frequency) and\n      attempt-frequency >= 0 and\n      isFinite(tunneling-mass) and\n      tunneling-mass > 0 and\n      isFinite(barrier-height) and\n      barrier-height >= 0 and\n      isFinite(barrier-width) and\n      barrier-width > 0 and\n      isFinite(biological-rate-correction)",
-      "domain": "ν₀ ≥ 0, m > 0, V−E ≥ 0, barrier-width > 0, f finite",
       "citation": "Löwdin 1963 Adv. Quantum Chem. 2:213; Gamow 1928",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6569,7 +6844,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(temperature) and\n      temperature > 0 and\n      isFinite(active-noise-energy)",
-      "domain": "T > 0 and Σ_active finite",
       "citation": "Cugliandolo & Kurchan 1993 J. Phys. A 26:L401",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6591,7 +6865,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(modular-hamiltonian-variation)",
-      "domain": "δ⟨H_R⟩ finite (nats)",
       "citation": "Faulkner, Lewkowycz & Maldacena 2013 JHEP 11:074; Blanco et al. 2013 JHEP 08:060",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6616,7 +6889,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(causal-set-count-0) and\n      isFinite(causal-set-count-1) and\n      isFinite(causal-set-count-2) and\n      isFinite(causal-set-count-3) and\n      isFinite(planck-length) and\n      planck-length > 0",
-      "domain": "N_0..N_3 finite, ℓ_P > 0",
       "citation": "Benincasa & Dowker 2010 PRL 104:181301",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6644,7 +6916,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(reference-correlation-length) and\n      reference-correlation-length > 0 and\n      isFinite(temperature) and\n      temperature > 0 and\n      isFinite(reference-temperature) and\n      reference-temperature > 0 and\n      isFinite(dynamic-exponent-z) and\n      dynamic-exponent-z != 0",
-      "domain": "ξ_0 > 0, T > 0, T_0 > 0, ν finite, z ≠ 0",
       "citation": "Hertz 1976 PRB 14:1165; Millis 1993 PRB 48:7183; Sachdev 2011 QPT 2nd ed. Ch.11",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6674,7 +6945,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(quench-timescale) and\n      quench-timescale > 0 and\n      isFinite(microscopic-relaxation-time) and\n      microscopic-relaxation-time > 0 and\n      isFinite(spatial-dimension) and\n      isFinite(static-exponent-nu) and\n      isFinite(dynamic-exponent-z) and\n      isFinite(defect-rest-mass) and\n      defect-rest-mass >= 0 and\n      isFinite(reheating-temperature) and\n      reheating-temperature > 0 and\n      1 + dynamic-exponent-z * static-exponent-nu != 0",
-      "domain": "τ_Q>0, τ_0>0, d/ν/z finite, m_defect≥0, T_reh>0, 1+zν≠0",
       "citation": "Kibble 1976 J. Phys. A 9:1387; Zurek 1985 Nature 317:505",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6701,7 +6971,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(gravitational-wave-speed) and\n      gravitational-wave-speed > 0",
-      "domain": "c_GW > 0 and finite",
       "citation": "Abbott et al. 2017 ApJ Lett. 848:L13; Boran et al. 2018 PRD 97:041501",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6724,7 +6993,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(newtonian-force) and\n      newtonian-force > 0 and\n      isFinite(mass) and\n      mass > 0 and\n      isFinite(mond-acceleration-scale) and\n      mond-acceleration-scale > 0",
-      "domain": "F_N > 0, m > 0, a_0 > 0",
       "citation": "Milgrom 1983 ApJ 270:365; Famaey & McGaugh 2012 Living Rev. Relativity 15:10",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6751,7 +7019,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(newton-coupling-dimensionless) and\n      isFinite(cosmological-constant-dimensionless) and\n      isFinite(truncation-coefficient-a) and\n      isFinite(truncation-coefficient-b) and\n      isFinite(truncation-coefficient-c)",
-      "domain": "g, λ, A, B, C all finite",
       "citation": "Reuter 1998 PRD 57:971; Reuter & Weyer 2009 Gen. Rel. Grav. 41:983",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6780,7 +7047,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(reference-mass) and\n      reference-mass >= 0 and\n      isFinite(swampland-coefficient) and\n      isFinite(scalar-field-value) and\n      isFinite(scalar-field-reference) and\n      isFinite(planck-mass) and\n      planck-mass > 0",
-      "domain": "m₀ ≥ 0, α/φ/φ₀ finite, M_P > 0",
       "citation": "Ooguri & Vafa 2007 Nucl. Phys. B 766:21; Vafa 2005 (hep-th/0509212)",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6805,7 +7071,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(wormhole-cross-section-area) and\n      wormhole-cross-section-area >= 0",
-      "domain": "A_wh ≥ 0 and finite",
       "citation": "Maldacena & Susskind 2013 Fortschr. Phys. 61:781; Bekenstein 1973 PRD 7:2333",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6829,7 +7094,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(planck-mass-energy) and\n      planck-mass-energy > 0 and\n      isFinite(inflation-hubble-energy) and\n      inflation-hubble-energy > 0 and\n      isFinite(tensor-to-scalar-ratio) and\n      tensor-to-scalar-ratio > 0 and\n      isFinite(tcc-correction-coefficient)",
-      "domain": "M_P > 0, H_inf > 0, r > 0, γ finite",
       "citation": "Bedroya & Vafa 2019 (arXiv:1909.11063)",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6855,7 +7119,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(measure-normalization) and\n      isFinite(anthropic-model-parameter) and\n      isFinite(landscape-parameter) and\n      landscape-parameter > 0",
-      "domain": "A, α finite, Λ > 0",
       "citation": "Vilenkin 1995 PRL 74:846; Weinberg 1987 PRL 59:2607",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6885,7 +7148,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(hubble-rate) and\n      isFinite(nucleon-yield-density) and\n      isFinite(sm-reaction-rate-coefficient) and\n      isFinite(proton-density) and\n      isFinite(neutron-density) and\n      isFinite(dark-reaction-rate-coefficient) and\n      isFinite(dark-species-density) and\n      isFinite(transfer-efficiency)",
-      "domain": "all eight Boltzmann inputs finite",
       "citation": "Kolb & Turner 1990 §5.2; Pitrou et al. 2018 Phys. Rep. 754:1",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6916,7 +7178,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(total-mutual-information) and\n      isFinite(darwinism-magnitude) and\n      isFinite(fragment-count) and\n      fragment-count > 0 and\n      isFinite(darwinism-decay-exponent)",
-      "domain": "I(S:E), α, β finite; k > 0",
       "citation": "Zurek 2009 Nat. Phys. 5:181; Blume-Kohout & Zurek 2006 PRA 73:062310",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6941,7 +7202,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(retarded-field-amplitude) and isFinite(advanced-field-amplitude)",
-      "domain": "A_ret and A_adv finite",
       "citation": "Wheeler & Feynman 1945 RMP 17:157; Cramer 1986 RMP 58:647",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6966,7 +7226,6 @@
       ],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "isFinite(higgs-decay-constant) and\n      higgs-decay-constant > 0 and\n      isFinite(higgs-field) and\n      isFinite(composite-higgs-alpha) and\n      isFinite(composite-higgs-beta)",
-      "domain": "f > 0; h, α, β finite (natural units)",
       "citation": "Kaplan & Georgi 1984 PLB 136:183; Giudice, Grojean, Pomarol & Rattazzi 2007 JHEP 0706:045",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -6994,7 +7253,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isInteger(chern-number) and chern-number != 0",
-      "domain": "C is a nonzero integer",
       "citation": "von Klitzing 1980 PRL 45:494; Thouless, Kohmoto, Nightingale & den Nijs 1982 PRL 49:405",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7019,7 +7277,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(voltage)",
-      "domain": "V finite",
       "citation": "Josephson 1962 Phys. Lett. 1:251",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7044,7 +7301,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(filling-fraction) and filling-fraction > 0",
-      "domain": "ν finite and > 0",
       "citation": "Tsui, Störmer & Gossard 1982 PRL 48:1559; Laughlin 1983 PRL 50:1395",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7070,14 +7326,13 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(mean-molecular-weight-per-electron) and\n      mean-molecular-weight-per-electron > 0 and\n      isFinite(lane-emden-omega-3)",
-      "domain": "μ_e > 0 and ω₃⁰ finite",
       "citation": "Chandrasekhar 1931 ApJ 74:81",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
           "lane-emden-omega-3": 2,
           "mean-molecular-weight-per-electron": 2
         },
-        "value": 2.869551926217048e+30
+        "value": 2.8695519181987356e+30
       }
     },
     {
@@ -7106,7 +7361,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(poynting-flux) and\n      poynting-flux >= 0 and\n      isFinite(reflectance) and\n      reflectance >= 0 and\n      reflectance <= 1 and\n      isFinite(incidence-angle) and incidence-angle >= 0 and incidence-angle < pi / 2",
-      "domain": "I ≥ 0, R on [0, 1], θ finite; transmission 0; incidence-angle >= 0 and incidence-angle < pi / 2",
       "citation": "OpenStax University Physics Volume 2, https://openstax.org/books/university-physics-volume-2/pages/16-4-momentum-and-radiation-pressure (absorber I/c, reflector 2I/c). The (1+R) cos²θ factor is this catalog's assembly.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7137,14 +7391,13 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(magnetic-flux-density) and\n      magnetic-flux-density >= 0 and\n      isFinite(plasma-mass-density) and\n      plasma-mass-density > 0",
-      "domain": "B ≥ 0 and ρ > 0, both finite; ρ is a mass density",
       "citation": "Alfvén 1942 Nature 150:405. SI form B/√(μ0 ρ); ρ is the total mass density.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
           "magnetic-flux-density": 1e-08,
           "plasma-mass-density": 1.67e-21
         },
-        "value": 218291.50359208556
+        "value": 218291.50366604768
       }
     },
     {
@@ -7167,7 +7420,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(proper-temperature) and\n      proper-temperature > 0 and\n      isFinite(metric-g00) and\n      metric-g00 < 0",
-      "domain": "T > 0 and g_00 < 0, both finite",
       "citation": "Tolman & Ehrenfest 1930 Phys. Rev. 36:1791 (T0 √g_44). Catalog form T √(−g_00).",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7202,7 +7454,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(sound-speed) and\n      sound-speed >= 0 and\n      isFinite(magnetic-flux-density) and\n      isFinite(plasma-mass-density) and\n      plasma-mass-density > 0",
-      "domain": "c_s ≥ 0, B finite, ρ > 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.FastMagnetosonic.speed_eq. Perpendicular compressional phase speed. c_s = 0 is the Alfvén number of a different polarization.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7210,7 +7461,7 @@
           "magnetic-flux-density": 1e-08,
           "plasma-mass-density": 1.67e-21
         },
-        "value": 218520.4350638482
+        "value": 218520.43513773286
       }
     },
     {
@@ -7237,7 +7488,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(electrical-mobility) and\n      isFinite(einstein-temperature) and\n      einstein-temperature != 0 and\n      isFinite(carrier-charge) and\n      carrier-charge != 0",
-      "domain": "μ finite, T ≠ 0, and q ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.EinsteinRelation.diffusion_eq. Drift cancels diffusion on a Boltzmann profile.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7272,7 +7522,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(specific-latent-heat) and\n      isFinite(clapeyron-temperature) and\n      clapeyron-temperature != 0 and\n      isFinite(specific-volume-change) and\n      specific-volume-change != 0",
-      "domain": "L finite, T ≠ 0, Δv ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Clapeyron.slope_eq. L = T (s2−s1) is already substituted. The entropy slope is not a second edge.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7303,7 +7552,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(redshift-metric-g00-1) and\n      redshift-metric-g00-1 < 0 and\n      isFinite(redshift-metric-g00-2) and\n      redshift-metric-g00-2 < 0",
-      "domain": "both static g_00 components are finite and negative",
       "citation": "PhysJS.GravitationalRedshift.frequency_ratio. Not PhysJS.TolmanEhrenfest.hydrostatic_constant. tolman_same_ratio is nested and is not this edge.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7333,7 +7581,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(seebeck-coefficient) and isFinite(peltier-temperature) and peltier-temperature != 0",
-      "domain": "S finite and T ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.KelvinRelation.peltier_eq. L12 = L21 is ThermoelectricOnsager.onsager, a structure field, not an axiom and not an input.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7360,13 +7607,12 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(magnetic-flux-density)",
-      "domain": "B finite; the factor 2 is the stored-energy half, not C = 1",
       "citation": "PhysJS.MagneticPressure.pressure_eq. U = (L/2) I². C = 1 is the battery work per volume, not this pressure.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
           "magnetic-flux-density": 1e-08
         },
-        "value": 3.9788735751312084e-11
+        "value": 3.978873577827474e-11
       }
     },
     {
@@ -7391,14 +7637,13 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(effective-mass) and effective-mass > 0 and isFinite(carrier-density) and carrier-density > 0",
-      "domain": "m > 0 and n > 0; e is the elementary charge",
       "citation": "PhysJS.LondonPenetration.depth_eq. Units also admit μ0 e²/m. Not the classical skin depth.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
           "effective-mass": 9.1093837015e-31,
           "carrier-density": 1e+28
         },
-        "value": 5.314093261582035e-08
+        "value": 5.3140932633825706e-8
       }
     },
     {
@@ -7428,7 +7673,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(carrier-density) and\n      isFinite(temperature) and\n      isFinite(magnetic-pressure) and\n      magnetic-pressure != 0",
-      "domain": "n and T finite, p_B ≠ 0; p_B is B²/(2 μ0)",
       "citation": "PhysJS.PlasmaBeta.beta_eq. p_B is PhysJS.MagneticPressure.pressure_eq. Using B²/μ0 is half of this beta. Not a plasma-β inequality.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7470,7 +7714,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(pipe-radius) and\n      pipe-radius > 0 and\n      isFinite(pipe-pressure-drop) and\n      isFinite(dynamic-viscosity) and\n      dynamic-viscosity != 0 and\n      isFinite(pipe-length) and\n      pipe-length != 0",
-      "domain": "R > 0, ΔP finite, μ ≠ 0, L ≠ 0; circular pipe, not a square duct",
       "citation": "PhysJS.HagenPoiseuille.flow_eq. f_D Re = 64 follows from Darcy definitions. The Fanning factor is 16. Not a square duct.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7508,7 +7751,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(youngs-modulus) and\n      youngs-modulus > 0 and\n      isFinite(area-moment) and\n      area-moment > 0 and\n      isFinite(column-length) and\n      column-length > 0",
-      "domain": "E > 0, I > 0, L > 0; pinned ends y(0) = y(L) = 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.EulerBuckling.critical_load. The beam equation is a hypothesis. The clamped-free load is π² E I / (4 L²), not this load.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7546,7 +7788,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(pull-in-stiffness) and\n      pull-in-stiffness > 0 and\n      isFinite(pull-in-gap) and\n      pull-in-gap > 0 and\n      isFinite(pull-in-area) and\n      pull-in-area > 0",
-      "domain": "k > 0, g0 > 0, A > 0; the fold is g = 2 g0/3, not g0/2",
       "citation": "PhysJS.PullIn.pull_in_eq. C = ε0 A/g and the linear spring are hypotheses. g = g0/2 is not the fold.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7554,7 +7795,7 @@
           "pull-in-gap": 2e-06,
           "pull-in-area": 1e-08
         },
-        "value": 16.361900223777916
+        "value": 16.36190021823413
       }
     },
     {
@@ -7588,7 +7829,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(mott-permittivity) and\n      mott-permittivity > 0 and\n      isFinite(mott-mobility) and\n      mott-mobility > 0 and\n      isFinite(mott-voltage) and\n      isFinite(mott-thickness) and\n      mott-thickness > 0",
-      "domain": "ε > 0, μ > 0, V finite, d > 0; E(0) = 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.MottGurney.current_eq. Drift, Poisson, and the injecting contact are hypotheses. Not Child–Langmuir.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7627,7 +7867,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(child-carrier-mass) and\n      child-carrier-mass > 0 and\n      isFinite(child-voltage) and\n      child-voltage > 0 and\n      isFinite(child-gap) and\n      child-gap > 0",
-      "domain": "m > 0, V > 0, d > 0; cathode field 0; Poisson not at x = 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ChildLangmuir.current_eq. e is the elementary charge. Not a drift-only solid.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7635,7 +7874,7 @@
           "child-voltage": 100,
           "child-gap": 0.001
         },
-        "value": 2333.951938468463
+        "value": 2333.9519400500553
       }
     },
     {
@@ -7665,7 +7904,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(shockley-saturation) and\n      isFinite(shockley-voltage) and\n      isFinite(shockley-temperature) and\n      shockley-temperature != 0",
-      "domain": "I_s and V finite, T ≠ 0; ideality 1",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ShockleyDiode.shockley_eq. Quasi-equilibrium, detailed balance at V = 0, and low injection are hypotheses. Ideality 2 is not this current.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7698,7 +7936,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(thomson-temperature) and isFinite(seebeck-slope)",
-      "domain": "T and dS/dT finite; Kelvin along temperature and the Thomson split are hypotheses",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Thomson.thomson_eq. Π(t) = S(t) t is PhysJS.KelvinRelation.peltier_eq read along temperature. Not a second copy of Π = S T.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7730,7 +7967,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(four-point-voltage) and isFinite(four-point-current) and four-point-current != 0",
-      "domain": "V finite, I ≠ 0; probes at 0, s, 2s, 3s; radial field (I R_s)/(2 π r)",
       "citation": "PhysJS.FourPoint.sheet_eq. The Laplace field and linear superposition are hypotheses. A sink at 4s is 2π/ln 3. Not PhysJS.Crossing.antisymmetry.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7757,7 +7993,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(shot-current)",
-      "domain": "I finite; Poisson Var(N) = mean(N); one-sided Δf = 1/(2 T)",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ShotNoise.shot_eq. e is the elementary charge. The two-sided bandwidth gives e I. Not Johnson–Nyquist.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7782,7 +8017,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(skin-friction)",
-      "domain": "C_f finite; normalized wall gradients agree and Pr = 1",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ReynoldsAnalogy.reynolds_eq. St Pr = C_f/2 when the slopes match. Pr = 1 is the hypothesis that drops Pr. Not a Nusselt correlation.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7813,7 +8047,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(capacitor-temperature) and isFinite(capacitance) and capacitance > 0",
-      "domain": "T finite, C > 0; U = (C/2) V²",
       "citation": "PhysJS.CapacitorNoise.noise_eq. (3/2) k_B T/C is not this variance. Dropping the energy half gives k_B T/(2 C).",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7839,7 +8072,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(fermi-sea-density) and fermi-sea-density > 0",
-      "domain": "n > 0, m* > 0; two spins, T = 0, isotropic parabola",
       "citation": "PhysJS.FermiSea.fermi_sea. One spin is k_F³ = 6 π² n. Not a lattice band. The band, the two-spin count, and T = 0 are hypotheses.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7868,7 +8100,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(debye-sound-speed) and debye-sound-speed > 0 and isFinite(debye-atom-density) and debye-atom-density > 0",
-      "domain": "v_s > 0, n > 0; three acoustic branches, one speed",
       "citation": "PhysJS.DebyeCutoff.debye_cutoff. Equating the three-branch sum to n gives k_D³ = 2 π² n. The branch count and the common speed are hypotheses.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7902,7 +8133,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(debye-atom-count) and debye-atom-count > 0 and\n      isFinite(debye-temperature) and debye-temperature > 0 and\n      isFinite(debye-theta) and debye-theta > 0 and 10 * debye-temperature <= debye-theta",
-      "domain": "N > 0, T > 0, θ_D > 0; I = π⁴/15 is assumed; 10 * debye-temperature <= debye-theta",
       "citation": "PhysJS.DebyeHeat.debye_heat. I = π⁴/15 is a hypothesis, not an evaluation of the Bose integral. The energy prefactor 3 π⁴/5 is not the heat capacity.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7937,7 +8167,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(einstein-atom-count) and einstein-atom-count > 0 and\n      isFinite(einstein-solid-temperature) and einstein-solid-temperature > 0 and\n      isFinite(einstein-theta) and einstein-theta > 0",
-      "domain": "N > 0, T > 0, θ_E > 0; three Einstein oscillators",
       "citation": "PhysJS.EinsteinSolid.einstein_heat. The high-temperature limit is 3 N k_B. One oscillator tends to N k_B. The zero-point is constant.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -7972,7 +8201,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(sommerfeld-density) and sommerfeld-density > 0 and\n      isFinite(sommerfeld-temperature) and sommerfeld-temperature > 0 and\n      isFinite(sommerfeld-fermi-energy) and sommerfeld-fermi-energy > 0 and 10 * k_B * sommerfeld-temperature <= sommerfeld-fermi-energy",
-      "domain": "n > 0, T > 0, E_F > 0; δU is a hypothesis; √E density; 10 * k_B * sommerfeld-temperature <= sommerfeld-fermi-energy",
       "citation": "PhysJS.SommerfeldHeat.electronic_heat. A flat density leaves π²/3. Not the Wiedemann–Franz law and not a second proof of be-61.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8019,7 +8247,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(curie-density) and curie-density > 0 and\n      isFinite(curie-g-factor) and\n      isFinite(curie-spin) and curie-spin >= 0 and\n      isFinite(curie-magneton) and curie-magneton > 0 and\n      isFinite(curie-temperature) and isFinite(weiss-temperature) and\n      curie-temperature != weiss-temperature and curie-temperature > weiss-temperature",
-      "domain": "n > 0, μ_B > 0, spin ≥ 0, T ≠ θ; second moment and mean field are hypotheses; curie-temperature > weiss-temperature",
       "citation": "PhysJS.CurieWeiss.curie_weiss. θ = 0 is C/T. Not an su(2) derivation. The second moment and the mean-field shift are hypotheses.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8030,7 +8257,7 @@
           "curie-temperature": 300,
           "weiss-temperature": 100
         },
-        "value": 0.009132875856972988
+        "value": 0.009132875850784136
       }
     },
     {
@@ -8057,7 +8284,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(pauli-density) and pauli-density > 0 and\n      isFinite(pauli-fermi-energy) and pauli-fermi-energy > 0 and\n      isFinite(pauli-magneton) and pauli-magneton > 0",
-      "domain": "n > 0, E_F > 0, μ_B > 0; Zeeman imbalance is a hypothesis",
       "citation": "PhysJS.PauliParamagnetism.pauli. A flat density leaves the factor 1. Not Landau diamagnetism.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8065,7 +8291,7 @@
           "pauli-fermi-energy": 1.12e-18,
           "pauli-magneton": 9.274e-24
         },
-        "value": 1.2260288621294371e-05
+        "value": 0.000012260288612986245
       }
     },
     {
@@ -8084,7 +8310,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(gl-kappa) and gl-kappa > 0",
-      "domain": "κ > 0; the factor multiplies this trial, not every minimizer",
       "citation": "PhysJS.GinzburgLandau.type_boundary. Negative when κ > 1/√2. The positive side is this trial, not every minimizer.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8109,7 +8334,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(upper-critical-length) and upper-critical-length > 0",
-      "domain": "ξ > 0; charge q = 2e; the Landau level is a hypothesis",
       "citation": "PhysJS.UpperCritical.critical_field. Charge e instead of 2e is a different field. Not the spectrum of the covariant Laplacian.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8134,7 +8358,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(ambegaokar-gap) and ambegaokar-gap > 0",
-      "domain": "Δ > 0; T = 0 and identical gaps are hypotheses",
       "citation": "PhysJS.AmbegaokarBaratoff.ambegaokar_baratoff. A coefficient other than π/2 fails. Not the finite-temperature tanh factor.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8159,7 +8382,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(bcs-quartic) and bcs-quartic != 0",
-      "domain": "ζ finite and nonzero; ζ is the quartic coefficient",
       "citation": "PhysJS.BcsJump.heat_jump. ζ is the quartic coefficient, not a series evaluation. One spin in C_n misses the ratio.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8196,7 +8418,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(conduction-dos) and conduction-dos > 0 and\n      isFinite(valence-dos) and valence-dos > 0 and\n      isFinite(mass-action-gap) and\n      isFinite(mass-action-temperature) and mass-action-temperature > 0",
-      "domain": "N_c > 0, N_v > 0, T > 0; Boltzmann tails are hypotheses",
       "citation": "PhysJS.MassAction.mass_action. Dropping the 2 in the exponent is a different density. Not a Fermi–Dirac integral.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8228,7 +8449,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(lst-static) and isFinite(lst-infinity) and lst-infinity != 0 and lst-static >= lst-infinity",
-      "domain": "ε(∞) ≠ 0; no damping is a hypothesis; lst-static >= lst-infinity",
       "citation": "PhysJS.LyddaneSachsTeller.lst. The unsquared frequency ratio fails when ω_LO ≠ ω_TO. No damping is a hypothesis.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8254,7 +8474,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(bkt-stiffness) and bkt-stiffness > 0",
-      "domain": "J > 0; area entropy of core positions is the hypothesis",
       "citation": "PhysJS.BktJump.bkt_jump. Circumference entropy unbinds at π J. Not the renormalization-group flow.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8279,7 +8498,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(landauer-transmission)",
-      "domain": "Σ T_n finite; spin = 2 and Δμ = e V are hypotheses",
       "citation": "PhysJS.LandauerConductance.conductance_eq. One spin is e²/h. Not the Hall conductance and not Landauer erasure.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8308,7 +8526,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(bohm-ion-mass) and bohm-ion-mass > 0",
-      "domain": "m_i > 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.BohmSheath.cold_bohm_threshold. The sound-speed root is the non-negative one. γ_i = 5/3 is not the warm closure.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8342,7 +8559,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(ion-acoustic-wavenumber) and ion-acoustic-wavenumber != 0",
-      "domain": "k ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.IonAcoustic.dispersion_eq. Warm ions and a kinetic dispersion are not this row.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8377,7 +8593,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(upper-hybrid-mass) and upper-hybrid-mass > 0",
-      "domain": "m > 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.UpperHybrid.upper_hybrid_eq. e is the elementary charge. Not a cyclotron monomial.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8385,7 +8600,7 @@
           "upper-hybrid-field": 0.1,
           "upper-hybrid-mass": 9.1093837015e-31
         },
-        "value": 18470810934.26198
+        "value": 18470810933.67817
       }
     },
     {
@@ -8408,7 +8623,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(cutoff-cyclotron) and cutoff-cyclotron >= 0",
-      "domain": "ω_c ≥ 0; the Stix index is a hypothesis",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ColdPlasmaCutoff.cutoff_R. The cold Stix index n_R² = 1 − ω_p²/(ω(ω − ω_c)) is a hypothesis. The Stix dielectric is not re-derived.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8442,7 +8656,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "lower-hybrid-ion-plasma != 0 and lower-hybrid-ion-cyclotron != 0 and lower-hybrid-electron-cyclotron != 0",
-      "domain": "frequencies finite and nonzero",
       "citation": "PhysJS.LowerHybrid.lower_hybrid_eq. Dropping the leading 1 leaves ω² = ω_ci ω_ce.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8477,7 +8690,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(oblique-sound) and isFinite(oblique-alfven)",
-      "domain": "c_s² and v_A² ≥ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ObliqueMagnetosonic.phase_speed_eq. The be-69 quartic with k_∥ = k cos θ is a hypothesis.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8508,14 +8720,13 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "bennett-line-density >= 0 and bennett-temperature >= 0",
-      "domain": "N ≥ 0 and T ≥ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.BennettPinch.equal_temperature_current. N_e = N_i = N and T_e = T_i = T. The factor 8 is the single-population current.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
           "bennett-line-density": 1000000000000000000,
           "bennett-temperature": 1000000
         },
-        "value": 23500.204248034508
+        "value": 23500.204255996912
       }
     },
     {
@@ -8538,7 +8749,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "loss-cone-mirror != 0 and loss-cone-throat <= loss-cone-mirror",
-      "domain": "Bm ≠ 0; loss-cone-throat <= loss-cone-mirror",
       "citation": "PhysJS.LossCone.loss_cone_eq. Pitch-angle scattering is not this statement.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8580,7 +8790,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "gradb-charge != 0 and gradb-field != 0",
-      "domain": "q ≠ 0 and B ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.GradBDrift.drift_magnitude. q is the signed charge. High-β curvature is a different vector.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8617,7 +8826,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "exb-field != 0",
-      "domain": "B ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ExBDrift.drift_eq. v_x = E_y/B and v_y = −E_x/B. Not a finite-Larmor-radius drift.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8652,7 +8860,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "landau-wavenumber != 0 and landau-thermal != 0",
-      "domain": "k ≠ 0 and v_t ≠ 0; the residue is a hypothesis",
       "citation": "PhysJS.LandauDamping.damping_eq. The residue formula γ = (π ω³/(2 n k²)) (∂f/∂v)|_{ω/k} is a hypothesis, not a contour integral.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8683,7 +8890,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(debye-sphere-density) and isFinite(debye-sphere-length)",
-      "domain": "n and λ_D finite",
       "citation": "PhysJS.DebyeSphere.coulomb_argument. The angular integral and ln Λ are not evaluated.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8713,7 +8919,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "multi-debye-1 != 0 and multi-debye-2 != 0",
-      "domain": "both lengths nonzero",
       "citation": "PhysJS.MultiDebye.debye_two. Dropping a responding species leaves a different length.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8751,7 +8956,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "lorentz-temperature > 0 and lorentz-mass > 0",
-      "domain": "T > 0 and m > 0; the transport integrals are hypotheses",
       "citation": "PhysJS.LorentzResistivity.resistivity_eq. σ_tr = 4π b0² ln Λ and the conductivity moment are hypotheses. The typed reference closure is nested.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8760,7 +8964,7 @@
           "lorentz-temperature": 1000000,
           "lorentz-mass": 9.1093837015e-31
         },
-        "value": 1.1391849743171435e-06
+        "value": 0.0000011391849727732165
       }
     },
     {
@@ -8783,14 +8987,13 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(slab-conductivity) and isFinite(slab-width)",
-      "domain": "σ and L finite",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ResistiveSlab.decay_time. A denominator 4π is not π². Not the Reynolds analogy.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
           "slab-conductivity": 60000000,
           "slab-width": 0.01
         },
-        "value": 0.0007639437272570034
+        "value": 0.0007639437267393204
       }
     },
     {
@@ -8813,7 +9016,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "parker-sound != 0",
-      "domain": "c_s ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ParkerCritical.critical_radius. The critical point also has v² = c_s².",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8851,7 +9053,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "spiral-radial-speed != 0",
-      "domain": "v_r ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ParkerSpiral.spiral_ratio. Dropping the sign is a different spiral.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8887,7 +9088,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "standoff-density != 0 and standoff-speed != 0",
-      "domain": "ρ ≠ 0 and v ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ChapmanFerraro.standoff_eq. A doubled dipole is a hypothesis. Specular 2 ρ v² replaces the numerator 2 by 1.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8895,7 +9095,7 @@
           "standoff-density": 1.67e-20,
           "standoff-speed": 400000
         },
-        "value": 572409.8062426782
+        "value": 572409.8066305692
       }
     },
     {
@@ -8922,7 +9122,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "lawson-reactivity != 0 and lawson-energy != 0",
-      "domain": "⟨σv⟩ ≠ 0 and E ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.LawsonBreakeven.breakeven_eq. The 12 is 4 × 3. The Maxwellian average is not computed.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8953,7 +9152,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "probe-electron-mass > 0 and probe-ion-mass > 0 and probe-ion-mass > probe-electron-mass",
-      "domain": "masses positive; probe-ion-mass > probe-electron-mass",
       "citation": "PhysJS.LangmuirProbe.floating_potential. The ion flux is the nested bohmFlux object. Not Child–Langmuir.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -8979,7 +9177,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(cross-field-alpha)",
-      "domain": "α finite",
       "citation": "PhysJS.CrossFieldDiffusion.diffusion_ratio. Einstein relation on μ and on μ/(1+α²) is be-70 and is not re-proved. Bohm 1/16 equals this ratio only when α² = 15.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9008,7 +9205,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(firehose-beta-parallel) and isFinite(firehose-beta-perp)",
-      "domain": "betas finite",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Firehose.firehose_threshold. The CGL root is a hypothesis. With β = 2 μ0 p/B² the threshold is β_∥ − β_⊥ > 2.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9042,7 +9238,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "mirror-t-parallel != 0",
-      "domain": "T_∥ ≠ 0; the kinetic integral is a hypothesis",
       "citation": "PhysJS.MirrorInstability.mirror_threshold. The threshold β_⊥ (T_⊥/T_∥ − 1) > 1 is a hypothesis. The kinetic integral is not evaluated.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9085,7 +9280,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(comb-airgap) and comb-airgap != 0",
-      "domain": "g ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.CombDrive.force_eq. Both sidewalls and the coenergy 1/2 cancel. One sidewall leaves the 1/2. Not be-79.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9122,7 +9316,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(swing-kelvin) and\n      swing-kelvin != 0 and\n      isFinite(swing-oxide) and\n      swing-oxide != 0 and\n      swing-oxide + swing-depletion != 0",
-      "domain": "T ≠ 0, C_ox ≠ 0, and C_ox + C_d ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.SubthresholdSwing.swing_eq. e is the elementary charge. Dropping C_d is not the swing when C_d ≠ 0. Not be-82.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9149,7 +9342,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(boost-duty) and boost-duty != 1 and boost-duty >= 0 and boost-duty < 1",
-      "domain": "D ≠ 1; boost-duty >= 0 and boost-duty < 1",
       "citation": "PhysJS.BoostConverter.boost_ratio. Volt-second balance. No real duty equals both this ratio and the buck ratio D.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9186,7 +9378,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(fin-conductivity) and\n      fin-conductivity > 0 and\n      isFinite(fin-web) and\n      fin-web > 0 and\n      isFinite(fin-convection) and\n      fin-convection > 0 and\n      isFinite(fin-span) and\n      fin-span != 0",
-      "domain": "k > 0, t > 0, h > 0, and L ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.FinEfficiency.efficiency_eq. One face is not that m. tanh is not 1, so this is not an infinite fin.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9222,7 +9413,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "not (not isFinite(teg-source) or teg-source == 0) and not (not isFinite(teg-sink) or not isFinite(teg-figure)) and not ((1 + teg-figure * ((teg-source + teg-sink) / 2)) < 0) and sqrt((1 + teg-figure * ((teg-source + teg-sink) / 2))) + teg-sink / teg-source != 0 and teg-sink <= teg-source",
-      "domain": "T_h ≠ 0, 1 + Z T_m ≥ 0, and the denominator ≠ 0; teg-sink <= teg-source",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ThermoelectricGenerator.efficiency_eq. Matched load m = 1 is not stationary when Z T_m ≠ 0. The Carnot factor alone is not this efficiency.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9269,7 +9459,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "not (not (joukowsky-rho > 0 and joukowsky-bulk > 0 and joukowsky-wallmod > 0 and joukowsky-thk > 0)) and 1 + ((joukowsky-bulk / joukowsky-wallmod) * (joukowsky-bore / joukowsky-thk)) > 0",
-      "domain": "ρ > 0, K > 0, E > 0, e_wall > 0, and 1 + (K/E)(D/e_wall) > 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Joukowsky.joukowsky_eq. ρ (Δv)² is not ρ c Δv when c ≠ Δv. Dropping the wall term is the rigid-pipe speed.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9307,7 +9496,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "coax-inner > 0 and coax-outer > 0 and coax-inner != coax-outer and coax-liner != 0",
-      "domain": "a > 0, b > 0, a ≠ b, and ε ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.CoaxialCapacitance.capacitance_per_length. Dropping 2 π is not this capacitance. Not a parallel-plate ε A/d.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9342,7 +9530,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "damping-inertia > 0 and damping-spring > 0",
-      "domain": "m > 0 and k > 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.DampingRatio.damping_ratio. For c ≥ 0 the discriminant vanishes iff ζ = 1. Dropping the 2 is not this ratio.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9381,7 +9568,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(blochlaw-dstiff) and blochlaw-dstiff > 0 and isFinite(blochlaw-warmth) and blochlaw-warmth >= 0",
-      "domain": "D > 0 and T ≥ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.BlochLaw.bloch_law. ζ(3/2) is not evaluated. g μ_B at g = 2 is not one Bohr magneton.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9413,7 +9599,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(dos3d-bandmass) and dos3d-bandmass > 0 and isFinite(dos3d-abscissa) and dos3d-abscissa >= 0",
-      "domain": "m > 0 and E ≥ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.DensityOfStates3D.dos_3d. One spin replaces 1/(2 π²) by 1/(4 π²). Not be-88.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9439,7 +9624,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(dos2d-bandmass) and dos2d-bandmass != 0",
-      "domain": "m ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.DensityOfStates2D.dos_2d. A valley factor other than 1 is not this density.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9468,14 +9652,13 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(tfscreen-n3) and isFinite(tfscreen-chemical) and tfscreen-chemical > 0",
-      "domain": "E_F > 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ThomasFermi.thomas_fermi. A flat density leaves the factor 1. Not the Debye length.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
           "tfscreen-n3": 8.47e+28,
           "tfscreen-chemical": 1.12e-18
         },
-        "value": 328873366745079350000
+        "value": 328873366522219800000
       }
     },
     {
@@ -9506,7 +9689,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(builtin-warmth) and\n      isFinite(builtin-acceptor) and\n      builtin-acceptor > 0 and\n      isFinite(builtin-donor) and\n      builtin-donor > 0 and\n      isFinite(builtin-ni) and\n      builtin-ni > 0",
-      "domain": "N_A > 0, N_D > 0, and n_i > 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.BuiltinVoltage.builtin_voltage. Not the ideal diode of be-82.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9542,7 +9724,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(fermioffset-warmth) and\n      fermioffset-warmth != 0 and\n      isFinite(fermioffset-holemass) and\n      fermioffset-holemass > 0 and\n      isFinite(fermioffset-elecmass) and\n      fermioffset-elecmass > 0",
-      "domain": "T ≠ 0, m_h* > 0, and m_e* > 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.SemiconductorFermi.fermi_level. The 3/4 is half of 3/2. The edge value is the intrinsic offset.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9569,7 +9750,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(onsagerk-karea)",
-      "domain": "A is finite",
       "citation": "PhysJS.OnsagerFrequency.onsager_frequency. γ cancels. Δ(1/B) = 1/F.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9594,7 +9774,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(josephsonl-ic) and josephsonl-ic != 0",
-      "domain": "I_c ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.JosephsonInductance.inductance_eq. cos φ = 1 at φ = 0. Not be-59.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9623,7 +9802,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(lowercrit-xi) and\n      lowercrit-xi > 0 and\n      isFinite(lowercrit-pen) and\n      lowercrit-pen > lowercrit-xi",
-      "domain": "0 < ξ < λ",
       "citation": "PhysJS.LowerCritical.lower_critical. Not be-96.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9661,7 +9839,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(acdrude-n3) and\n      isFinite(acdrude-bandmass) and\n      acdrude-bandmass != 0 and\n      isFinite(acdrude-scatter) and\n      acdrude-scatter > 0 and\n      isFinite(acdrude-radian)",
-      "domain": "τ > 0 and m ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.AcDrude.ac_drude. Dropping the DC 1 is not this conductivity. Not be-123.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9693,7 +9870,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(matthsum-scatter1) and\n      matthsum-scatter1 != 0 and\n      isFinite(matthsum-scatter2) and\n      matthsum-scatter2 != 0 and\n      1 / matthsum-scatter1 + 1 / matthsum-scatter2 != 0",
-      "domain": "τ₁ ≠ 0, τ₂ ≠ 0, and 1/τ₁ + 1/τ₂ ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Matthiessen.matthiessen. The edge value is τ. ρ = ρ₁ + ρ₂ is the same rate sum.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9723,7 +9899,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(stonerchi-pauli) and isFinite(stonerchi-ig) and abs(stonerchi-ig) < 1",
-      "domain": "|x| < 1",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Stoner.stoner. χ_P is be-94 and is not re-proved. The pole is the same formula.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9753,7 +9928,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(gortercas-tc) and\n      gortercas-tc > 0 and\n      isFinite(gortercas-warmth) and\n      gortercas-warmth >= 0 and\n      gortercas-warmth < gortercas-tc",
-      "domain": "T_c > 0 and 0 ≤ T < T_c",
       "citation": "PhysJS.GorterCasimir.gorter_casimir. The exponent 4 is a hypothesis. λ(T) is on the result and is not this edge. Not be-75.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9787,7 +9961,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(arrhwarmth) and arrhwarmth != 0",
-      "domain": "T ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Arrhenius.arrhenius_eq. The prefactor is temperature-independent. Not the Eyring identification of A.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9818,7 +9991,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(eyringwarmth) and eyringwarmth != 0",
-      "domain": "T ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Eyring.eyring_eq. Transmission coefficient 1. The molar substitutions differ by exp(−1).",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9848,7 +10020,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(vanthoffwarmth) and vanthoffwarmth != 0",
-      "domain": "T ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.VanTHoff.vant_hoff. Not a plot and not a second proof of be-150.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9878,7 +10049,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(gibbsisok) and gibbsisok > 0 and isFinite(gibbsisowarmth) and gibbsisowarmth != 0",
-      "domain": "K > 0 and T ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.GibbsIsotherm.gibbs_eq. Not an activity model.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9916,7 +10086,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(nernstgn) and nernstgn != 0 and isFinite(nernstgq) and nernstgq > 0",
-      "domain": "n ≠ 0 and Q > 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.NernstGibbs.nernst_eq. e is the elementary charge.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9952,7 +10121,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(clapintwarm1) and clapintwarm1 > 0 and isFinite(clapintwarm2) and clapintwarm2 > 0",
-      "domain": "T1 > 0 and T2 > 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ClausiusClapeyron.integrated_eq. A separate liquid volume is not this row.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -9983,7 +10151,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(raoultsat) and raoultsat > 0 and raoultmole >= 0 and raoultmole <= 1",
-      "domain": "P* > 0; raoultmole >= 0 and raoultmole <= 1",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Raoult.raoult_eq. Not a second proof of the Gibbs isotherm.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10017,7 +10184,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(prandtlk) and prandtlk != 0",
-      "domain": "k ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Prandtl.prandtl_eq. Not a heat-transfer correlation.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10056,7 +10222,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(reynummu) and reynummu != 0",
-      "domain": "μ ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.ReynoldsNumber.reynolds_eq. Not a friction correlation.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10092,7 +10257,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(biotk) and biotk != 0",
-      "domain": "k ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Biot.biot_eq. Not a lumped-capacitance criterion.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10127,7 +10291,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(nusseltk) and nusseltk != 0",
-      "domain": "k ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Nusselt.nusselt_eq. Not a correlation for Nu.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10162,7 +10325,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(schmidtrho) and schmidtrho != 0 and isFinite(schmidtdiff) and schmidtdiff != 0",
-      "domain": "ρ ≠ 0 and D ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Schmidt.schmidt_eq. Lewis number is not this row.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10197,7 +10359,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(sherwooddiff) and sherwooddiff != 0",
-      "domain": "D ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Sherwood.sherwood_eq. Not a correlation for Sh.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10236,7 +10397,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(fourierslabk) and fourierslabk != 0 and isFinite(fourierslablen) and fourierslablen != 0",
-      "domain": "k ≠ 0 and L ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.FourierConduction.fourier_eq. The sign is part of the statement.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10288,7 +10448,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(newtonrho) and isFinite(newtoncp) and isFinite(newtonvol) and newtonrho*newtoncp*newtonvol != 0 and isFinite(newtonfilm) and isFinite(newtonarea) and newtonfilm*newtonarea != 0",
-      "domain": "ρ c V ≠ 0 and h A ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.NewtonCooling.newton_eq. Radiation in T^4 is not this row.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10323,7 +10482,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(ottoratio) and ottoratio > 0 and isFinite(ottogamma) and ottogamma > 1 and ottoratio > 1",
-      "domain": "r > 0 and γ > 1; ottoratio > 1",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Otto.otto_eq. The exponent γ−1 is not 1−γ.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10361,7 +10519,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(jtcp) and jtcp != 0",
-      "domain": "c_p ≠ 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.JouleThomson.joule_thomson_eq. The ideal-gas bracket vanishes.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10393,7 +10550,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(planckfreq) and planckfreq > 0 and isFinite(planckwarmth) and planckwarmth > 0",
-      "domain": "ν > 0 and T > 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.PlanckSpectrum.planck_eq. Two polarizations. One polarization is not this density.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10413,7 +10569,6 @@
       "sources": [],
       "aliases": {},
       "holds": "true",
-      "domain": "no variable input",
       "citation": "PhysJS.StefanBoltzmann.stefan_boltzmann_eq. Not equal to the Stefan constant symbol when that symbol omits this quotient.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {},
@@ -10436,7 +10591,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(wienroot) and wienroot > 4 and wienroot < 5 and abs((5 - wienroot) - 5 * exp(-wienroot)) < 0.00001",
-      "domain": "4 < x < 5; abs((5 - wienroot) - 5 * exp(-wienroot)) < 0.00001",
       "citation": "PhysJS.WienDisplacement.wien_eq. The decimal root is not evaluated.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10469,7 +10623,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(sackurquantum) and sackurquantum > 0 and isFinite(sackurdensity) and sackurdensity > 0 and 10 * sackurdensity <= sackurquantum",
-      "domain": "n_Q > 0 and n > 0; 10 * sackurdensity <= sackurquantum",
       "citation": "PhysJS.SackurTetrode.sackur_tetrode. Stirling is ln N! = N ln N − N.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10504,7 +10657,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(sahamass) and sahamass > 0 and isFinite(sahawarmth) and sahawarmth > 0",
-      "domain": "m > 0 and T > 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.Saha.saha_eq. The electron weight 2 is not in this statement.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10539,7 +10691,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(richardswarmth) and richardswarmth > 0",
-      "domain": "T > 0",
       "citation": "PhysJS.RichardsonDushman.richardson_eq. Reflection coefficient 1. e is the elementary charge.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10570,7 +10721,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(onsagerb0) and abs(onsagerb0) <= 1e-12 and isFinite(onsagerl12)",
-      "domain": "|B| ≤ 1 pT (zero field at measurement precision)",
       "citation": "PhysJS.OnsagerReciprocity.onsager_eq. L12(B) = L21(−B) is not this row.",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10596,7 +10746,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(plate-separation) and plate-separation > 0",
-      "domain": "plate separation > 0",
       "citation": "Casimir 1948 Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. 51:793",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10621,7 +10770,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(unruh-acceleration) and unruh-acceleration >= 0",
-      "domain": "proper acceleration ≥ 0",
       "citation": "Unruh 1976 Phys. Rev. D 14:870",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10650,7 +10798,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(johnson-temperature) and johnson-temperature >= 0 and isFinite(resistance) and resistance >= 0",
-      "domain": "temperature ≥ 0 and resistance ≥ 0",
       "citation": "Nyquist 1928 Phys. Rev. 32:110",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10680,7 +10827,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(electrical-conductivity) and electrical-conductivity >= 0 and isFinite(wiedemann-temperature) and wiedemann-temperature >= 0",
-      "domain": "conductivity ≥ 0 and temperature ≥ 0",
       "citation": "Franz and Wiedemann 1853",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10706,7 +10852,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(critical-temperature) and critical-temperature >= 0",
-      "domain": "critical temperature ≥ 0",
       "citation": "Bardeen, Cooper, and Schrieffer 1957 Phys. Rev. 108:1175",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
@@ -10731,13 +10876,12 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(accretor-mass) and accretor-mass > 0",
-      "domain": "accretor mass > 0",
       "citation": "Eddington 1926 The Internal Constitution of the Stars",
       "reference": {
         "inputs": {
           "accretor-mass": 1.989e+30
         },
-        "value": 1.2574382573536063e+31
+        "value": 1.257438264156123e+31
       }
     },
     {
@@ -10764,7 +10908,6 @@
         ]
       },
       "holds": "isFinite(jeans-temperature) and jeans-temperature > 0 and isFinite(jeans-density) and jeans-density > 0 and isFinite(mean-molecular-weight) and mean-molecular-weight > 0",
-      "domain": "temperature, density, and mean molecular weight are positive",
       "citation": "Jeans 1902 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 199:1",
       "notice": {
         "text": "formula: M_J = (5 k_B T / (G μ m_u))^{3/2} · (3/(4π ρ))^{1/2}. The leading 5 is convention-dependent; the number above is this formula, not a checked universal prefactor."
@@ -10775,7 +10918,7 @@
           "jeans-density": 1e-18,
           "mean-molecular-weight": 2.3
         },
-        "value": 1.9476307989132442e+32
+        "value": 1.9476307948315846e+32
       }
     }
   ],