tribunal-kit 9.2.5 → 9.2.7

package/skills/ai-app-hardening/SKILL.md

@@ -1,22 +1,49 @@
----
-name: ai-app-hardening
-description: "Use when OWASP Top 10 for LLMs (2026), prompt injection defense, model output sanitization, indirect injection defense, and automated SBOM dependency security."
-version: 5.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-13
-skills:
-  - ai-prompt-injection-defense
-  - vulnerability-scanner
-  - backend-security-expert
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-scripts-binding:
-  - .agent/scripts/security_scan.js
-  - .agent/scripts/guardrail_engine.js
-  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
-  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
----
-
-# AI Application Hardening & Indirect Prompt Injection Defense
-
+---
+name: ai-app-hardening
+description: "Use when auditing, pen-testing, hardening, and verifying code against ai app hardening vulnerabilities, injection vectors, and auth flaws."
+version: 6.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-29
+skills:
+  - ai-prompt-injection-defense
+  - vulnerability-scanner
+  - backend-security-expert
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
+scripts-binding:
+  - .agent/scripts/security_scan.js
+  - .agent/scripts/guardrail_engine.js
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
+  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
+---
+
+# AI Application Hardening & Indirect Prompt Injection Defense
+
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `ai-app-hardening` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+- **Activate when:** Use when auditing, pen-testing, hardening, and verifying code against ai app hardening vulnerabilities, injection vectors, and auth flaws.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `ai-app-hardening` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
+
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
+|:---|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
+
+
 ---
 
 ## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
@@ -48,4 +75,49 @@ export function sanitizeRAGDocument(rawDocumentContent: string): string {
 | **LLM01** | Prompt Injection (Direct & Indirect) | Delimiter sandboxing + `sanitizeRAGDocument` filter |
 | **LLM02** | Insecure Output Handling             | Strict Zod output parsing + DOMPurify on frontend   |
 | **LLM04** | Model Denial of Service              | Hard `max_tokens` limit + IP bucket rate limiting   |
-| **LLM07** | System Prompt Leakage                | System prompt redaction guards in output stream     |
+| **LLM07** | System Prompt Leakage                | System prompt redaction guards in output stream     |
+
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Hardcoded Secret Pattern** | Committing API keys, tokens, or private salts into source code | Load credentials strictly via runtime environment variables and secret stores |
+| **Prompt Injection Surface** | Directly concatenating untrusted user input into LLM system prompts | Wrap user content in isolated delimiters and strip injection control sequences |
+| **Missing Authorization Check** | Relying only on authentication token presence without checking tenant/object RBAC | Verify user permissions against the specific target record ID before mutation |
+
+
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
+
+**Active Reviewers:** `security-auditor` · `penetration-tester` · `backend-security-expert`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
+
+### 🔬 Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
+Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
+- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
+- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
+- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
+
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
+```
+✅ Are user inputs sanitized and treated as untrusted data at system boundaries?
+✅ Are secrets loaded strictly via environment variables with zero hardcoding?
+✅ Is least-privilege enforcement active on APIs, tokens, and storage buckets?
+✅ Are prompt-injection delimiters and sanitizers wrapped around LLM inputs?
+✅ Did I verify encryption in transit and at rest for sensitive data?
+```
+
+### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
+- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/skills/ai-prompt-injection-defense/SKILL.md

@@ -1,26 +1,51 @@
----
-name: ai-prompt-injection-defense
-description: "Use when Prompt Injection and Jailbreak defense mastery. Mitigation strategies for direct injection, indirect injection via data poisoning, delimiter separation, XML framing, output validation, and LLM circuit breakers. Use when building AI systems that process untrusted user input or fetch external data."
-version: 5.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-13
-skills:
-  - backend-security-expert
-  - vulnerability-scanner
-  - llm-engineering
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-scripts-binding:
-  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
-  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
----
-
-# Prompt Injection Defense — AI Security Mastery
-
----
-
-## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
-
+---
+name: ai-prompt-injection-defense
+description: "Use when auditing, pen-testing, hardening, and verifying code against ai prompt injection defense vulnerabilities, injection vectors, and auth flaws."
+version: 6.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-29
+skills:
+  - backend-security-expert
+  - vulnerability-scanner
+  - llm-engineering
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
+scripts-binding:
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
+  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
+---
+
+# Prompt Injection Defense — AI Security Mastery
+
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `ai-prompt-injection-defense` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+- **Activate when:** Use when auditing, pen-testing, hardening, and verifying code against ai prompt injection defense vulnerabilities, injection vectors, and auth flaws.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `ai-prompt-injection-defense` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
+
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
+|:---|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
+
+
 ---
 
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
 ## 2026 AI Prompt Injection & Sandboxing Invariants
 
 1. **Dual-LLM Pattern (Privileged vs Untrusted)**:
@@ -159,4 +184,40 @@ const deleteUserTool = {
 Many injections occur because the LLM includes malicious data in its output, which the app then renders (creating XSS) or executes.
 
 - **Always sanitize LLM output.** Do not render Markdown or HTML from an LLM as unescaped raw HTML (`dangerouslySetInnerHTML`).
-- **Enforce JSON Schemas.** If the LLM goes off-script and starts blabbering, Zod validation should instantly fail the parsing and reject the output.
+- **Enforce JSON Schemas.** If the LLM goes off-script and starts blabbering, Zod validation should instantly fail the parsing and reject the output.
+
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
+
+**Active Reviewers:** `security-auditor` · `penetration-tester` · `backend-security-expert`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
+
+### 🔬 Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
+Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
+- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
+- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
+- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
+
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
+```
+✅ Are user inputs sanitized and treated as untrusted data at system boundaries?
+✅ Are secrets loaded strictly via environment variables with zero hardcoding?
+✅ Is least-privilege enforcement active on APIs, tokens, and storage buckets?
+✅ Are prompt-injection delimiters and sanitizers wrapped around LLM inputs?
+✅ Did I verify encryption in transit and at rest for sensitive data?
+```
+
+### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
+- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/skills/animation-on-scroll/SKILL.md

@@ -1,37 +1,54 @@
----
-name: animation-on-scroll
-description: "Use when building performant scroll-driven animations, CSS scroll-timeline, view-timeline reveals, GSAP ScrollTrigger scrollytelling, or Framer Motion scroll indicators without scroll jank or layout thrashing."
-version: 5.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-13
-skills:
-  - motion-engineering
-  - 60fps-animation
-  - accessible-animation
-  - review-animations
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-scripts-binding:
-  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
-  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
----
-
-# Animation On Scroll — Precision Scroll-Driven Architecture & Scrollytelling
-
----
-
-## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
-
-Scroll motion connects physical gesture with dynamic interface reveals. Poorly engineered scroll animations hijack the native scroll wheel, introduce frame drops by calculating `getBoundingClientRect()` inside unthrottled scroll listeners, or cause pin spacers to collapse layouts. Master-grade scroll architecture executes directly on the browser compositor layer using native CSS `animation-timeline` when possible, leverages GSAP `ScrollTrigger` with subpixel pinning offsets for complex timelines, and strictly obeys the Anti-Scrolljacking rule.
-
----
-
----
-
----
-
+---
+name: animation-on-scroll
+description: "Use when implementing, optimizing, and timing 60fps/120fps animation on scroll animations, transitions, gesture physics, and reduced-motion fallbacks."
+version: 6.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-29
+skills:
+  - motion-engineering
+  - 60fps-animation
+  - accessible-animation
+  - review-animations
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
+scripts-binding:
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
+  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
+---
+
+# Animation On Scroll — Precision Scroll-Driven Architecture & Scrollytelling
+
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `animation-on-scroll` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+- **Activate when:** Use when implementing, optimizing, and timing 60fps/120fps animation on scroll animations, transitions, gesture physics, and reduced-motion fallbacks.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `animation-on-scroll` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
+
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
+|:---|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
+
+
 ---
 
 ## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
 
+Scroll motion connects physical gesture with dynamic interface reveals. Poorly engineered scroll animations hijack the native scroll wheel, introduce frame drops by calculating `getBoundingClientRect()` inside unthrottled scroll listeners, or cause pin spacers to collapse layouts. Master-grade scroll architecture executes directly on the browser compositor layer using native CSS `animation-timeline` when possible, leverages GSAP `ScrollTrigger` with subpixel pinning offsets for complex timelines, and strictly obeys the Anti-Scrolljacking rule.
+
 ### 1. Engine Selection Matrix
 
 | Use Case                              | Recommended Engine                         | Rationale                                                       |
@@ -193,4 +210,49 @@ export function ParallaxHeroCard() {
     animation-timeline: scroll(root block);
   }
 }
-```
+```
+
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **The Instant Pop Trap** | Conditionally unmounting elements without animated interpolation | Use AnimatePresence or coordinate morphs with continuous geometry |
+| **Layout Thrashing** | Animating width, height, top, or left inside animation loops | Animate composite-only transform (translate3d, scale) and opacity |
+| **Sluggish Duration** | Setting micro-interaction transitions to 600ms+ causing interface lag | Cap interactive feedback at 160ms–240ms with snappy ease-out curves |
+
+
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
+
+**Active Reviewers:** `frontend-reviewer` · `motion-reviewer` · `ui-ux-auditor`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
+
+### 🔬 Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
+Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
+- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
+- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
+- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
+
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
+```
+✅ Does animation maintain 60fps/120fps using transform (translate3d, scale) and opacity?
+✅ Is optical mass conserved across state interpolations without volume collapse?
+✅ Is duration capped within micro-interaction budgets (150ms–280ms)?
+✅ Is prefers-reduced-motion respected with graceful instant fallbacks?
+✅ Did I prevent layout thrashing and continuous geometry mutations?
+```
+
+### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
+- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/skills/animation-systems/SKILL.md

@@ -1,37 +1,54 @@
----
-name: animation-systems
-description: "Use when creating and architecting design-system motion tokens, centralized duration tiers, CSS custom property easings, Tailwind motion configs, and unified cross-platform animation guidelines."
-version: 5.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-13
-skills:
-  - motion-engineering
-  - 60fps-animation
-  - baseline-ui
-  - better-ui
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-scripts-binding:
-  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
-  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
----
-
-# Animation Systems — Global Motion Tokens & Design System Architecture
-
----
-
-## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
-
-Without a centralized motion system, codebases descend into animation chaos: arbitrary durations (`350ms`, `420ms`, `175ms`), dissonant easing curves, and unmaintainable component overrides. A professional animation system treats motion as a primary design token—equivalent to color palettes, typography scales, and spatial grids. It standardizes duration tiers, codifies physics-grounded easing curves, and exposes single-source-of-truth tokens across CSS custom properties, Tailwind configs, and Framer Motion dictionaries.
-
----
-
----
-
----
-
+---
+name: animation-systems
+description: "Use when implementing, optimizing, and timing 60fps/120fps animation systems animations, transitions, gesture physics, and reduced-motion fallbacks."
+version: 6.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-29
+skills:
+  - motion-engineering
+  - 60fps-animation
+  - baseline-ui
+  - better-ui
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
+scripts-binding:
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
+  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
+---
+
+# Animation Systems — Global Motion Tokens & Design System Architecture
+
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `animation-systems` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+- **Activate when:** Use when implementing, optimizing, and timing 60fps/120fps animation systems animations, transitions, gesture physics, and reduced-motion fallbacks.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `animation-systems` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
+
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
+|:---|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
+
+
 ---
 
 ## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
 
+Without a centralized motion system, codebases descend into animation chaos: arbitrary durations (`350ms`, `420ms`, `175ms`), dissonant easing curves, and unmaintainable component overrides. A professional animation system treats motion as a primary design token—equivalent to color palettes, typography scales, and spatial grids. It standardizes duration tiers, codifies physics-grounded easing curves, and exposes single-source-of-truth tokens across CSS custom properties, Tailwind configs, and Framer Motion dictionaries.
+
 ### 1. The Global Motion Token Taxonomy
 
 | Token Variable          | Value                               | Intended Interaction Scope                         |
@@ -195,4 +212,49 @@ export function SystemModal({ isOpen, children }: { isOpen: boolean; children: R
     </div>
   );
 }
-```
+```
+
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **The Instant Pop Trap** | Conditionally unmounting elements without animated interpolation | Use AnimatePresence or coordinate morphs with continuous geometry |
+| **Layout Thrashing** | Animating width, height, top, or left inside animation loops | Animate composite-only transform (translate3d, scale) and opacity |
+| **Sluggish Duration** | Setting micro-interaction transitions to 600ms+ causing interface lag | Cap interactive feedback at 160ms–240ms with snappy ease-out curves |
+
+
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
+
+**Active Reviewers:** `frontend-reviewer` · `motion-reviewer` · `ui-ux-auditor`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
+
+### 🔬 Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
+Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
+- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
+- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
+- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
+
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
+```
+✅ Does animation maintain 60fps/120fps using transform (translate3d, scale) and opacity?
+✅ Is optical mass conserved across state interpolations without volume collapse?
+✅ Is duration capped within micro-interaction budgets (150ms–280ms)?
+✅ Is prefers-reduced-motion respected with graceful instant fallbacks?
+✅ Did I prevent layout thrashing and continuous geometry mutations?
+```
+
+### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
+- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/skills/antfu-conventions/SKILL.md

@@ -1,26 +1,51 @@
----
-name: antfu-conventions
-description: "Use when Anthony Fu's opinionated tooling and conventions for JavaScript/TypeScript projects: ESM-first, zero-config, type-safe, and clean tooling standards."
-version: 5.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-13
-skills:
-  - clean-code
-  - typescript-advanced
-  - monorepo-management
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-scripts-binding:
-  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
-  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
----
-
-# Antfu Conventions — ESM-First & Opinionated Modern Tooling
-
----
-
-## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
-
+---
+name: antfu-conventions
+description: "Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing antfu conventions agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards."
+version: 6.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-29
+skills:
+  - clean-code
+  - typescript-advanced
+  - monorepo-management
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
+scripts-binding:
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
+  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
+---
+
+# Antfu Conventions — ESM-First & Opinionated Modern Tooling
+
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `antfu-conventions` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+- **Activate when:** Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing antfu conventions agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `antfu-conventions` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
+
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
+|:---|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
+
+
 ---
 
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
 ---
 
 ## 4 Core Tooling Conventions
@@ -51,4 +76,49 @@ export default antfu({
 
 ### 4. Explicit Type Imports (`import type`)
 
-- Enforce `import type { User } from './types'` to allow tree-shaking compilers (esbuild/tsdown) to strip type imports cleanly without runtime side effects.
+- Enforce `import type { User } from './types'` to allow tree-shaking compilers (esbuild/tsdown) to strip type imports cleanly without runtime side effects.
+
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Hallucinated Tool Capabilities** | Assuming an external library or CLI command exists without verification | Run a verification check or verify package.json before referencing tools |
+| **Premature Completion Claim** | Declaring a task finished because code was generated without verification | Execute tests, linters, or terminal commands to provide concrete proof |
+| **Context Bloat Dumping** | Pasting entire multi-thousand-line files into prompt context | Extract targeted excerpts, symbols, and signatures to preserve tokens |
+
+
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
+
+**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` · `agent-organizer` · `logic-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
+
+### 🔬 Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
+Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
+- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
+- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
+- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
+
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
+```
+✅ Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
+✅ Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
+✅ Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
+✅ Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
+✅ Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
+```
+
+### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
+- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.