tribunal-kit 9.2.5 → 9.2.6

package/.agents/skills/game-design-expert/SKILL.md

@@ -1,36 +1,58 @@
----
-name: game-design-expert
-description: "Use when Game Design, UX, and Flow State mastery. Replaces fragmented legacy skills. Core gameplay loop design, 3Cs (Character, Camera, Controls), input buffering, coyote time, juice (game feel), telemetry tracking, narrative alignment, and audio spatialization integration. Use when crafting player experience, progression arcs, or systemic balance."
-version: 5.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-13
-skills:
-  - game-engineering-expert
-  - 12-principles-of-animation
-  - sounds-on-the-web
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-scripts-binding:
-  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
-  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
----
-
-# Game Design Expert — Player Experience & Flow Mastery
-
----
-
-## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
-
+---
+name: game-design-expert
+description: "Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing game design expert agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards."
+version: 6.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-29
+skills:
+  - game-engineering-expert
+  - 12-principles-of-animation
+  - sounds-on-the-web
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
+scripts-binding:
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
+  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
+---
+
+# Game Design Expert — Player Experience & Flow Mastery
+
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `game-design-expert` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+- **Activate when:** Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing game design expert agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `game-design-expert` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
+
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
+|:---|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
+
+
 ---
 
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
 ## Hallucination Traps (Read First)
 
 - ❌ Designing reward systems without testing for compulsion loops -> ✅ Playtesting must verify engagement without addiction patterns
 - ❌ Assuming all players have the same skill level -> ✅ Design difficulty curves that adapt or offer accessibility options
 - ❌ Adding mechanics without testing the core loop first -> ✅ Core loop must be fun in isolation before adding complexity
 
----
-
----
-
+---
 ## 1. The 3Cs (Character, Camera, Controls)
 
 Before designing enemies, levels, or UI, the foundation of the player's interaction MUST feel flawless. If the player cannot intrinsically trust the controls, the entire system collapses.
@@ -89,4 +111,40 @@ Game design is not segregated from Audio. Audio is the primary vector for tempor
 
 Design is hypotheses. Playtests are the reality.
 
-Never rely on developers "feeling" the game. You must systematically log death coordinates (heatmaps). If 80% of players die at Level 2 Trap B, your design intent (teaching the mechanic) has failed.
+Never rely on developers "feeling" the game. You must systematically log death coordinates (heatmaps). If 80% of players die at Level 2 Trap B, your design intent (teaching the mechanic) has failed.
+
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
+
+**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` · `agent-organizer` · `logic-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
+
+### 🔬 Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
+Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
+- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
+- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
+- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
+
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
+```
+✅ Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
+✅ Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
+✅ Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
+✅ Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
+✅ Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
+```
+
+### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
+- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agents/skills/game-engineering-expert/SKILL.md

@@ -1,36 +1,58 @@
----
-name: game-engineering-expert
-description: "Use when Game Engineering and Systems Architecture mastery. Replaces fragmented legacy skills. Entity Component Systems (ECS), Unity (C#) / Godot (GDScript) integration, physics calculations, deterministic engine state, WebGL memory management, multiplayer sync architectures (deterministic lockstep vs traditional authoritative), spatial partitioning, and rendering pipelines."
-version: 5.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-13
-skills:
-  - game-design-expert
-  - csharp-developer
-  - 60fps-animation
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-scripts-binding:
-  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
-  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
----
-
-# Game Engineering Expert — Performance & State Mastery
-
----
-
-## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
-
+---
+name: game-engineering-expert
+description: "Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing game engineering expert agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards."
+version: 6.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-29
+skills:
+  - game-design-expert
+  - csharp-developer
+  - 60fps-animation
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
+scripts-binding:
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
+  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
+---
+
+# Game Engineering Expert — Performance & State Mastery
+
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `game-engineering-expert` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+- **Activate when:** Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing game engineering expert agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `game-engineering-expert` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
+
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
+|:---|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
+
+
 ---
 
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
 ## Hallucination Traps (Read First)
 
 - ❌ Using deltaTime without clamping -> ✅ Unclamped deltaTime causes physics explosions on frame spikes; clamp to max 0.05s
 - ❌ Allocating memory in the game loop (new objects, arrays) -> ✅ Pre-allocate and pool objects to avoid GC pauses during gameplay
 - ❌ Using floating-point equality checks for game state -> ✅ Use epsilon comparisons or integer-based fixed-point for deterministic logic
 
----
-
----
-
+---
 ## 1. Frame Rate Architecture (The Update Loop)
 
 In web development, we await Promises. In game development, we calculate Delta Time continuously.
@@ -105,4 +127,40 @@ Never trust the client. A multiplayer architecture dictates latency fundamentall
    - The Server runs the "Real" game.
    - The Client tells the server "I fired."
    - Because Ping takes 50ms, the Client _predicts_ the shot landing locally (optimistic UI) so the player doesn't feel lag.
-   - If the server eventually disagrees, the Client aggressively rewinds and snaps the state to match the Server reality (Rubber-banding).
+   - If the server eventually disagrees, the Client aggressively rewinds and snaps the state to match the Server reality (Rubber-banding).
+
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
+
+**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` · `agent-organizer` · `logic-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
+
+### 🔬 Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
+Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
+- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
+- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
+- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
+
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
+```
+✅ Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
+✅ Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
+✅ Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
+✅ Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
+✅ Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
+```
+
+### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
+- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agents/skills/generative-ui-expert/SKILL.md

@@ -1,26 +1,51 @@
----
-name: generative-ui-expert
-description: "Use when Generative UI mastery. Vercel AI SDK 3.0+, React Server Components (RSC) + LLMs, streaming UI elements, structured tool calling (Zod schemas), and managing client-side AI state via useChat/useObject."
-version: 5.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-13
-skills:
-  - nextjs-react-expert
-  - react-specialist
-  - browser-native-ai
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-scripts-binding:
-  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
-  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
----
-
-# Generative UI Expert (Vercel AI SDK)
-
----
-
-## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
-
+---
+name: generative-ui-expert
+description: "Use when designing, implementing, auditing, and hardening generative ui expert server logic, APIs, background jobs, and error boundaries."
+version: 6.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-29
+skills:
+  - nextjs-react-expert
+  - react-specialist
+  - browser-native-ai
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
+scripts-binding:
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
+  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
+---
+
+# Generative UI Expert (Vercel AI SDK)
+
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `generative-ui-expert` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+- **Activate when:** Use when designing, implementing, auditing, and hardening generative ui expert server logic, APIs, background jobs, and error boundaries.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `generative-ui-expert` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
+
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
+|:---|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
+
+
 ---
 
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
 ## 1. Core Principles
 
 - **No Markdown Slop:** Avoid dumping raw markdown when structured UI can be used. If the user asks for a weather report, stream a `<WeatherCard />`, not text.
@@ -97,4 +122,49 @@ Before submitting code, ensure:
 
 1. `zod` is used for all tool parameters.
 2. Server Actions are properly annotated with `"use server"`.
-3. The model supports tool calling (e.g., `gpt-4o`, `claude-3-5-sonnet`).
+3. The model supports tool calling (e.g., `gpt-4o`, `claude-3-5-sonnet`).
+
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Unchecked Payload Cast** | Casting request bodies to TypeScript types without runtime schema validation | Parse request payloads through Zod/Pydantic schemas before business logic |
+| **Silent Error Swallowing** | Catching errors with empty catch blocks or logging without rethrowing | Propagate structured errors with status codes and contextual stack traces |
+| **Unparameterized Query** | Concatenating user inputs into SQL/Prisma query strings | Always use parameterized bindings or type-safe ORM query builders |
+
+
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
+
+**Active Reviewers:** `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor` · `api-architect` · `resilience-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
+
+### 🔬 Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
+Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
+- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
+- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
+- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
+
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
+```
+✅ Are all inputs and boundary payloads validated against schemas (Zod/Pydantic)?
+✅ Are SQL and database queries parameterized with zero string concatenation?
+✅ Are error boundaries and timeout/retry policies explicitly declared?
+✅ Are authentication and object-level authorization (IDOR/BOLA) checked before business logic?
+✅ Did I verify that imported dependencies exist in package manifests?
+```
+
+### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
+- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agents/skills/geo-fundamentals/SKILL.md

@@ -1,36 +1,58 @@
----
-name: geo-fundamentals
-description: "Use when Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) mastery. Structuring content for LLM ingestion. Adapting SEO for AI interfaces (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity), optimizing markdown semantic hierarchies, citation structuring, minimizing boilerplate, reducing HTML DOM depth, and API-first content delivery. Use when making information discoverable not just to Google, but directly to AI indexing agents."
-version: 5.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-13
-skills:
-  - seo-fundamentals
-  - browser-native-ai
-  - readme-builder
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-scripts-binding:
-  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
-  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
----
-
-# Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
-
----
-
-## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
-
+---
+name: geo-fundamentals
+description: "Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing geo fundamentals agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards."
+version: 6.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-29
+skills:
+  - seo-fundamentals
+  - browser-native-ai
+  - readme-builder
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
+scripts-binding:
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
+  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
+---
+
+# Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
+
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `geo-fundamentals` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+- **Activate when:** Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing geo fundamentals agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `geo-fundamentals` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
+
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
+|:---|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
+
+
 ---
 
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
 ## Hallucination Traps (Read First)
 
 - ❌ Assuming SEO and GEO are the same -> ✅ GEO optimizes for AI crawlers and LLM ingestion, not just search engine ranking
 - ❌ Using complex nested HTML for content -> ✅ AI parsers prefer flat, semantic HTML with clear heading hierarchies
 - ❌ Ignoring structured data (JSON-LD) -> ✅ LLMs heavily weight structured data for citation and fact extraction
 
----
-
----
-
+---
 ## 1. The Death of Boilerplate (Information Density)
 
 When ChatGPT or Perplexity queries a website, it has a finite context window.
@@ -105,4 +127,40 @@ Transform prose into rigid QA objects using standard semantic data blocks.
 When an AI tries to write code using your product, it scrapes your API documentation.
 
 1. **Eliminate Image-Based Architecture:** Highlighting your architecture solely in a PNG graphic is invisible. Describe the system architecture using text or standard Mermaid.js code blocks.
-2. **Provide Concrete Copy-Paste Examples:** The easiest way to get an LLM to use your platform correctly is to ensure your docs contain perfectly working `curl`, `TypeScript`, and `Python` code snippets with zero external dependencies.
+2. **Provide Concrete Copy-Paste Examples:** The easiest way to get an LLM to use your platform correctly is to ensure your docs contain perfectly working `curl`, `TypeScript`, and `Python` code snippets with zero external dependencies.
+
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
+
+**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` · `agent-organizer` · `logic-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
+
+### 🔬 Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
+Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
+- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
+- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
+- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
+
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
+```
+✅ Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
+✅ Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
+✅ Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
+✅ Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
+✅ Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
+```
+
+### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
+- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agents/skills/git-pro/SKILL.md

@@ -1,26 +1,51 @@
----
-name: git-pro
-description: "Use when Industry-level Git & GitHub mastery. Advanced Git internals (bisect, worktrees, reflog), monorepo strategies (Turborepo/Nx), semantic-release, OIDC-based GitHub Actions auth (no static AWS secrets), CODEOWNERS, matrix builds, reusable workflows, and release engineering. Use when advanced Git operations, complex branching strategies, or production-grade CI/CD workflow authoring is required."
-version: 5.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-13
-skills:
-  - github-operations
-  - cicd-pro
-  - bash-linux
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-scripts-binding:
-  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
-  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
----
-
-# Git Pro — Industry-Level Mastery
-
----
-
-## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
-
+---
+name: git-pro
+description: "Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing git pro agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards."
+version: 6.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-29
+skills:
+  - github-operations
+  - cicd-pro
+  - bash-linux
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
+scripts-binding:
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
+  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
+---
+
+# Git Pro — Industry-Level Mastery
+
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+Before reading, generating, or refactoring code in the `git-pro` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+- **Activate when:** Use when executing, coordinating, planning, or reviewing git pro agent workflows, cognitive loops, and architecture standards.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `git-pro` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist agent.
+
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action | Adaptive Depth |
+|:---|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. | Fast / Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies, affected files, and tool calls. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. | All Modes |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack & Falsify** | Perform adversarial search for edge-case failures, counterexamples, race conditions, and traps. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 6** | **Harden** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. | Standard / Deep |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. | All Modes |
+
+
 ---
 
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
 ## Hallucination Traps (Read First)
 
 - ❌ `git push --force` on shared branches → ✅ Always use `git push --force-with-lease` (fails if remote has new commits you haven't seen)
@@ -398,4 +423,40 @@ resource "github_branch_protection" "main" {
   require_signed_commits    = true
   require_linear_history    = true   # squash merge only
 }
-```
+```
+
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Production Mitigation |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
+
+**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` · `agent-organizer` · `logic-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
+
+### 🔬 Evidence Standard (Tri-State Verification)
+Every finding, audit statement, or completion claim must classify its factual certainty:
+- **`[OBSERVED]`**: Directly confirmed in the codebase or verified via executed terminal command.
+- **`[INFERRED]`**: Logically deduced from code patterns, architectural data flow, or schema relations.
+- **`[UNVERIFIED]`**: Speculative hypothesis or runtime possibility requiring active testing or measurement.
+
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
+```
+✅ Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
+✅ Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
+✅ Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
+✅ Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
+✅ Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
+```
+
+### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
+- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.