tribunal-kit 9.0.0 → 9.0.1

package/.agent/skills/cobejs/SKILL.md

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 ---
 name: cobejs
-description: Build lightweight, hardware-accelerated 3D interactive animated globes and web orbs using Cobe WebGL.
-version: 4.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-07
+description: Use when Build lightweight, hardware-accelerated 3D interactive animated globes and web orbs using Cobe WebGL.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - 60fps-animation
   - motion-engineering
@@ -15,23 +15,41 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Cobe JS — Lightweight 3D WebGL Globe Visuals
 
----
-
 ## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
 
-Before building WebGL 3D globe components with Cobe, you MUST inspect:
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `cobejs` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
 
-1. `package.json` → Verify `cobe` dependency exists
-2. WebGL Context Cleanup (Section 59) → Ensure `globe.destroy()` is called in the `useEffect` unmount cleanup to prevent memory leaks
-3. Canvas Sizing (Section 65) → Match `devicePixelRatio` to high-DPI screens and set `aspectRatio: 1` to prevent visual stretching
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
 
-Integrate ultra-fast, 5KB WebGL interactive globes for landing page hero sections and interactive location maps.
+## Activation Boundaries
 
+- **Activate when:** Use when Build lightweight, hardware-accelerated 3D interactive animated globes and web orbs using Cobe WebGL.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `cobejs` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
 
-## Activation Boundaries
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
+---
 
-- **Activate when:** Operating in tasks requiring Build lightweight, hardware-accelerated 3D interactive animated globes and web orbs using Cobe WebGL..
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls strictly outside cobejs domain or belongs to a different dedicated specialist.
 
 ---
 
@@ -83,25 +101,45 @@ export function InteractiveGlobe() {
 
 ---
 
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+---
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Hallucinated Tool Capabilities** | Assuming an external library or CLI command exists without verification | Run a verification check or verify package.json before referencing tools |
+| **Premature Completion Claim** | Declaring a task finished because code was generated without verification | Execute tests, linters, or terminal commands to provide concrete proof |
+| **Context Bloat Dumping** | Pasting entire multi-thousand-line files into prompt context | Extract targeted excerpts, symbols, and signatures to preserve tokens |
+
+---
+
 ## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` · `agent-organizer` · `logic-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
+✅ Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
+✅ Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
+✅ Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
+✅ Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agent/skills/code-review-checklist/SKILL.md

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: code-review-checklist
-description: Code review guidelines covering code quality, security, and best practices.
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-version: 4.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-07
+description: Use when Code review guidelines covering code quality, security, and best practices.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - clean-code
   - lint-and-validate
   - thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
 scripts-binding:
   - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
   - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
@@ -15,21 +15,41 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Code Review Standards
 
----
-
 ## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
 
-Before performing code reviews or writing PR comments, you MUST inspect:
-
-1. Label Convention Standardization (Section 27) → Categorize all feedback into `BLOCKER:`, `CONCERN:`, `SUGGESTION:`, or `NOTE:`
-2. Context Window Discipline (Section 120) → Quote concise 1-3 line snippets with line numbers; ban pasting massive blocks of unchanged code
-3. Anti-Nitpicking Rule (Section 130) → Delegate syntax/formatting formatting checks to linters (`eslint`/Prettier); focus reviews on logic and security
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `code-review-checklist` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
 
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
 
 ## Activation Boundaries
 
-- **Activate when:** Operating in tasks requiring Code review guidelines covering code quality, security, and best practices..
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls strictly outside code-review-checklist domain or belongs to a different dedicated specialist.
+- **Activate when:** Use when Code review guidelines covering code quality, security, and best practices.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `code-review-checklist` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
+---
+
 
 ---
 
@@ -174,37 +194,45 @@ Evidence:    [link to terminal output, test result, or file diff]
 
 ---
 
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
 ---
 
-AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
 
-1. **Over-engineering:** Proposing complex abstractions or distributed systems when a simpler approach suffices.
-2. **Hallucinated Libraries/Methods:** Using non-existent methods or packages. Always `// VERIFY` or check `package.json` / `requirements.txt`.
-3. **Skipping Edge Cases:** Writing the "happy path" and ignoring error handling, timeouts, or data validation.
-4. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-5. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or re-raising.
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Hardcoded Secret Pattern** | Committing API keys, tokens, or private salts into source code | Load credentials strictly via runtime environment variables and secret stores |
+| **Prompt Injection Surface** | Directly concatenating untrusted user input into LLM system prompts | Wrap user content in isolated delimiters and strip injection control sequences |
+| **Missing Authorization Check** | Relying only on authentication token presence without checking tenant/object RBAC | Verify user permissions against the specific target record ID before mutation |
 
 ---
 
 ## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `security-auditor` · `penetration-tester` · `backend-security-expert`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Are user inputs sanitized and treated as untrusted at system boundaries?
+✅ Are secrets loaded strictly via environment variables with zero hardcoding?
+✅ Is least-privilege enforcement active on APIs, tokens, and storage buckets?
+✅ Are prompt-injection delimiters and sanitizers wrapped around LLM inputs?
+✅ Did I verify encryption in transit and at rest for sensitive customer data?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agent/skills/codebase-design/SKILL.md

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: codebase-design
-description: Guidance for designing deep modules with small interfaces and clean seams. Use when structuring a new module, refactoring complex codebases, or designing internal library boundaries.
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-version: 4.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-07
+description: Use when Guidance for designing deep modules with small interfaces and clean seams. Use when structuring a new module, refactoring complex codebases, or designing internal library boundaries.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - architecture
   - clean-code
   - domain-modeling
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
 scripts-binding:
   - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
   - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
@@ -15,21 +15,41 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Codebase Design — Deep Modules & Clean Seams
 
----
-
 ## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
 
-Before designing module boundaries or internal libraries, you MUST inspect:
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `codebase-design` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
 
-1. Deep Module Ratio Rule → Create deep modules (small simple interface hiding heavy internal complexity); ban shallow 1-line wrapper functions
-2. Strict Information Hiding → Keep internal data structures and vendor clients strictly private (`#privateField`); ban leaking internal ORM/DB entities in public APIs
-3. Ports & Adapters Isolation → Define abstract interfaces for external services (storage, payments, email); keep core business domain logic decoupled from vendor SDKs
-4. Policy vs Mechanism Separation → Separate generic execution mechanisms (SQL queries, HTTP fetches) from domain business policies (retry rules, pricing models)
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
 
 ## Activation Boundaries
 
-- **Activate when:** Structuring new software packages, refactoring monolithic files into modular boundaries, designing internal SDKs, and decoupling domain logic from third-party dependencies.
-- **DO NOT activate when:** Writing localized one-off utility helper functions or pure CSS styles.
+- **Activate when:** Use when Guidance for designing deep modules with small interfaces and clean seams. Use when structuring a new module, refactoring complex codebases, or designing internal library boundaries.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `codebase-design` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
+---
+
 
 ## 2026 Architecture & Module Invariants
 
@@ -87,25 +107,45 @@ class DeepUserStorage {
 
 ---
 
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+---
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Hallucinated Tool Capabilities** | Assuming an external library or CLI command exists without verification | Run a verification check or verify package.json before referencing tools |
+| **Premature Completion Claim** | Declaring a task finished because code was generated without verification | Execute tests, linters, or terminal commands to provide concrete proof |
+| **Context Bloat Dumping** | Pasting entire multi-thousand-line files into prompt context | Extract targeted excerpts, symbols, and signatures to preserve tokens |
+
+---
+
 ## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` · `agent-organizer` · `logic-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
+✅ Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
+✅ Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
+✅ Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
+✅ Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agent/skills/colorize/SKILL.md

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 ---
 name: colorize
-description: Introduce strategic, harmonious, accessible color systems and OKLCH color palettes to visually flat or dull interfaces.
-version: 4.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-07
+description: Use when Introduce strategic, harmonious, accessible color systems and OKLCH color palettes to visually flat or dull interfaces.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - better-colors
   - baseline-ui
@@ -15,23 +15,41 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Colorize — Color System & OKLCH Palette Design
 
----
-
 ## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
 
-Before designing color systems or applying color palettes, you MUST inspect:
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `colorize` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
 
-1. OKLCH Color Space (Section 24) → Use `oklch(L C H)` custom properties for uniform perceptual lightness across light/dark themes
-2. 60-30-10 Budget Rule (Section 39) → 60% Dominant Neutral (surfaces), 30% Structural Secondary (text/borders), 10% Intentional Accent (actions)
-3. Status Token Uniformity (Section 45) → Keep status color lightness consistent ($L \approx 0.60$–$0.72$) across Success, Warning, Destructive, and Info scales
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
 
-Architect uniform, perceptually balanced color scales using the modern OKLCH color space for light and dark modes.
+## Activation Boundaries
 
+- **Activate when:** Use when Introduce strategic, harmonious, accessible color systems and OKLCH color palettes to visually flat or dull interfaces.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `colorize` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
 
-## Activation Boundaries
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
+---
 
-- **Activate when:** Operating in tasks requiring Introduce strategic, harmonious, accessible color systems and OKLCH color palettes to visually flat or dull interfaces..
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls strictly outside colorize domain or belongs to a different dedicated specialist.
 
 ---
 
@@ -70,25 +88,45 @@ Never use random red/green/yellow hex codes. Maintain matching chroma and lightn
 
 ---
 
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+---
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Uncontrolled Re-render Loop** | Mutating state inside render bodies or omitting hook dependencies | Wrap effects with explicit deps and isolate reactive derivations in useMemo |
+| **Accessibility Neglect** | Interactive <div> without role="button", tabIndex, or onKeyDown | Use semantic <button> or provide ARIA role, keyboard handlers, and focus ring |
+| **Layout Shift Flash** | Images/dynamic content without aspect-ratio or explicit dimensions | Enforce aspect-ratio or skeleton placeholders to guarantee zero CLS |
+
+---
+
 ## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `frontend-reviewer` · `type-safety` · `ui-ux-auditor` · `complexity-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Are all component props strictly typed with zero implicit "any"?
+✅ Are responsive breakpoints, fluid typography, and optical balance verified?
+✅ Is accessibility (ARIA labels, keyboard focus, contrast) validated?
+✅ Are re-renders minimized and state lifecycles cleanly separated?
+✅ Did I verify all imported UI components and icon sets actually exist?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.