tribunal-kit 8.0.0 → 9.0.1

package/.agent/skills/property-based-testing/SKILL.md

@@ -1,28 +1,54 @@
 ---
 name: property-based-testing
-description: Generative input invariant testing using fast-check (TS/JS) and hypothesis (Python) to uncover hidden edge cases and boundary failures.
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Edit, Write
-version: 3.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-08-05
-script: .agent/scripts/test_runner.js
-scripts-binding:
-  - .agent/scripts/test_runner.js
-  - .agent/scripts/inner_loop_validator.js
+description: Use when Generative input invariant testing using fast-check (TS/JS) and hypothesis (Python) to uncover hidden edge cases and boundary failures.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - testing-patterns
   - tdd-workflow
   - clean-code
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
+scripts-binding:
+  - .agent/scripts/test_runner.js
+  - .agent/scripts/inner_loop_validator.js
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
+  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
 ---
 
 # Property-Based Testing — Invariant Verification
 
 ## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
 
-Before writing property tests:
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `property-based-testing` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+## Activation Boundaries
 
-1. Invariant Identification → Define mathematical properties that must hold true for ALL inputs (e.g. `reverse(reverse(list)) == list`)
-2. Arbitrary Generator Scoping → Constrain generator bounds to domain validity (e.g. non-empty strings, positive integers)
-3. Shrinking & Reproducibility → Store seed values for failing test runs to reproduce minimal failing inputs
+- **Activate when:** Use when Generative input invariant testing using fast-check (TS/JS) and hypothesis (Python) to uncover hidden edge cases and boundary failures.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `property-based-testing` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
 
 ## Fast-Check Arbitrary Generator & Vitest Invariant Test
 
@@ -52,7 +78,47 @@ test('currency parser invariant: non-negative parsed numbers', () => {
 });
 ```
 
-## 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+---
+
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+---
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Testing Implementation Details** | Asserting on private component state or internal helper functions | Assert on observable user behaviors, DOM roles, and network outcomes |
+| **Flaky Async Assertion** | Using arbitrary setTimeout delays before asserting on asynchronous state | Use waitFor or findBy queries that poll with timeout bounds |
+| **Shared Mutable State** | Reusing database records across concurrent test runners | Isolate test databases per worker or execute in rolled-back transactions |
+
+---
+
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
+
+**Active Reviewers:** `test-engineer` · `qa-automation-engineer` · `logic-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
+
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
+
+```
+✅ Do tests follow behavioral GIVEN/WHEN/THEN specifications?
+✅ Are happy path, failure paths, and boundary conditions (0, null, max) covered?
+✅ Are test mocks isolated and reset between successive suites?
+✅ Do E2E locators rely on stable ARIA attributes instead of brittle CSS selectors?
+✅ Did I verify test suite passes without flaky race conditions?
+```
+
+### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
 
-- Run minimum 100 iterations per property test run.
-- Confirm shrinking mechanism isolates minimal failing counter-example on assertion failure.
+**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
+- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agent/skills/python-patterns/SKILL.md

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: python-patterns
-description: Python development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, type hints, project structure. Teaches thinking, not copying.
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-version: 3.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-07-30
+description: Use when Python development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, type hints, project structure. Teaches thinking, not copying.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - python-pro
   - clean-code
   - data-validation-schemas
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
 scripts-binding:
   - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
   - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
@@ -15,15 +15,41 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Python Development Principles
 
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `python-patterns` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+
+- **Activate when:** Use when Python development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, type hints, project structure. Teaches thinking, not copying.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `python-patterns` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
 ---
 
-## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
 
-Before architecting Python projects or selecting frameworks, you MUST inspect:
+---
 
-1. Typed Data Models over Dicts (Section 15) → Use Pydantic models or `@dataclass` for structured data; ban un-typed `dict` passing
-2. Specific Exception Handling (Section 16) → Catch explicit exceptions (`ValueError`, `AppError`); ban bare `except:` or generic `except Exception:` swallowing
-3. Pathlib Modern API (Section 17) → Use `pathlib.Path` for cross-platform filesystem operations; ban legacy `os.path`
 
 ## Hallucination Traps (Read First)
 
@@ -33,8 +59,6 @@ Before architecting Python projects or selecting frameworks, you MUST inspect:
 
 ---
 
-# Python Development Principles
-
 ---
 
 ## Framework Selection
@@ -227,91 +251,45 @@ Do not mark status as VERIFIED until concrete terminal evidence is provided.
 
 ---
 
----
-
-AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
 
-1. **Over-engineering:** Proposing complex abstractions or distributed systems when a simpler approach suffices.
-2. **Hallucinated Libraries/Methods:** Using non-existent methods or packages. Always `// VERIFY` or check `package.json` / `requirements.txt`.
-3. **Skipping Edge Cases:** Writing the "happy path" and ignoring error handling, timeouts, or data validation.
-4. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-5. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or re-raising.
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
 
 ---
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
-
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
 
-Review these questions before confirming output:
-
-```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
-```
-
-### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
-
-**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-
-- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
-
-## Pre-Flight Checklist
-
-- [ ] Have I reviewed the user's specific constraints and requests?
-- [ ] Have I checked the environment for relevant existing implementations?
-
-## VBC Protocol (Verification-Before-Completion)
-
-You MUST verify existing code signatures and variables before attempting to modify or call them. No hallucination is permitted.
-
----
-
-## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps
-
-AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
-
-1. **Over-engineering:** Proposing complex abstractions or distributed systems when a simpler approach suffices.
-2. **Hallucinated Libraries/Methods:** Using non-existent methods or packages. Always `// VERIFY` or check `package.json` / `requirements.txt`.
-3. **Skipping Edge Cases:** Writing the "happy path" and ignoring error handling, timeouts, or data validation.
-4. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-5. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or re-raising.
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Unchecked Payload Cast** | Casting request bodies to TypeScript types without runtime schema validation | Parse request payloads through Zod/Pydantic schemas before business logic |
+| **Silent Error Swallowing** | Catching errors with empty catch blocks or logging without rethrowing | Propagate structured errors with status codes and contextual stack traces |
+| **Unparameterized Query** | Concatenating user inputs into SQL/Prisma query strings | Always use parameterized bindings or type-safe ORM query builders |
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Integration (Anti-Hallucination)
-
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
-
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+**Active Reviewers:** `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor` · `api-architect` · `resilience-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
-
-Review these questions before confirming output:
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Are all inputs and boundary payloads validated against schemas (Zod/Pydantic)?
+✅ Are SQL and database queries parameterized with zero string concatenation?
+✅ Are error boundaries and timeout/retry policies explicitly declared?
+✅ Are authentication checks performed before business logic execution?
+✅ Did I verify that imported dependencies exist in package.json/requirements.txt?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
 
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agent/skills/python-pro/SKILL.md

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: python-pro
-description: Python 3.12+ specialist. FastAPI, Pydantic v2, asyncio, modern types, pytest. Use when building Python APIs, data pipelines, automation, or any Python code.
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-version: 3.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-07-30
+description: Use when Python 3.12+ specialist. FastAPI, Pydantic v2, asyncio, modern types, pytest. Use when building Python APIs, data pipelines, automation, or any Python code.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - python-patterns
   - data-validation-schemas
   - api-patterns
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
 scripts-binding:
   - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
   - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
@@ -15,28 +15,70 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Python 3.12+ — Dense Reference
 
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `python-pro` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+
+- **Activate when:** Use when Python 3.12+ specialist. FastAPI, Pydantic v2, asyncio, modern types, pytest. Use when building Python APIs, data pipelines, automation, or any Python code.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `python-pro` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
 ---
 
-## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
 
-Before writing Python code or FastAPI endpoints, you MUST inspect:
+---
 
-1. Pydantic v2 Migration Syntax (Section 17) → Use `model_dump()`, `model_dump_json()`, `model_validate()`, and `@field_validator`; ban v1 `.dict()` and `@validator`
-2. Modern Native Generics (Section 16) → Use native `list[str]`, `dict[k,v]`, and `X | None` (Python 3.10+); ban legacy `typing.List` / `typing.Optional`
-3. Non-Blocking Async Clients (Section 21) → Use `httpx.AsyncClient()` in async code; ban blocking `requests` library inside asyncio event loops
 
-# Python 3.12+ — Dense Reference
+## 2026 Python 3.12+ Performance & Logic Invariants
+
+1. **Structured Concurrency with `TaskGroup`**:
+   ```python
+   async with asyncio.TaskGroup() as tg:
+       task1 = tg.create_task(fetch_user(user_id))
+       task2 = tg.create_task(fetch_orders(user_id))
+   # If either fails, the other is cancelled immediately; exceptions grouped in ExceptionGroup
+   ```
+2. **PEP 695 Native Type Aliases & Generics**:
+   ```python
+   type Coordinates = tuple[float, float]
+   def get_first[T](items: list[T]) -> T | None:
+       return items[0] if items else None
+   ```
+3. **Pydantic v2 Zero-Copy Deserialization**: Use `TypeAdapter(list[Model]).validate_python(data)` for batch parsing.
+4. **Connection Pooling & Lifespan**: Always manage client lifecycles using `lifespan` context managers rather than re-instantiating HTTP/DB clients per request.
 
 ## Hallucination Traps (Read First)
 
-- ❌ `from typing import List, Dict, Optional, Union` → ✅ `list[str]`, `dict[k,v]`, `X | None`, `X | Y` (Python 3.10+)
+- ❌ `from typing import List, Dict, Optional, Union, TypeVar` → ✅ Native `list[str]`, `dict[k,v]`, `X | None`, `type Alias = ...`
 - ❌ `user.dict()` / `user.json()` / `UserCreate.parse_obj()` → ✅ Pydantic v2: `model_dump()`, `model_dump_json()`, `model_validate()`
 - ❌ Pydantic `class Config: orm_mode = True` → ✅ `model_config = {"from_attributes": True}`
 - ❌ `@validator` / `@root_validator` → ✅ `@field_validator` / `@model_validator`
-- ❌ `@app.on_event("startup")` → ✅ `lifespan` context manager (deprecated)
-- ❌ `import requests` in async code → ✅ `httpx.AsyncClient()` (requests BLOCKS the event loop)
-- ❌ `asyncio.run()` inside running loop → ✅ `await` directly or use `loop.create_task()`
-- ❌ `except Exception as e: pass` → ✅ always log or re-raise
+- ❌ `@app.on_event("startup")` → ✅ FastAPI `lifespan` context manager
+- ❌ `import requests` in async code → ✅ `httpx.AsyncClient()`
+- ❌ `asyncio.gather()` leaving orphaned tasks on error → ✅ `asyncio.TaskGroup()`
+- ❌ `except Exception as e: pass` → ✅ Always log or re-raise
 
 ---
 
@@ -294,89 +336,45 @@ my-api/
 
 ---
 
-AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
-
-1. **Over-engineering:** Proposing complex abstractions or distributed systems when a simpler approach suffices.
-2. **Hallucinated Libraries/Methods:** Using non-existent methods or packages. Always `// VERIFY` or check `package.json` / `requirements.txt`.
-3. **Skipping Edge Cases:** Writing the "happy path" and ignoring error handling, timeouts, or data validation.
-4. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-5. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or re-raising.
-
----
-
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
-
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
 
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-
-Review these questions before confirming output:
-
-```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
-```
-
-### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
-
-**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-
-- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
-
-## Pre-Flight Checklist
-
-- [ ] Have I reviewed the user's specific constraints and requests?
-- [ ] Have I checked the environment for relevant existing implementations?
-
-## VBC Protocol (Verification-Before-Completion)
-
-You MUST verify existing code signatures and variables before attempting to modify or call them. No hallucination is permitted.
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
 
 ---
 
-## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps
-
-AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
 
-1. **Over-engineering:** Proposing complex abstractions or distributed systems when a simpler approach suffices.
-2. **Hallucinated Libraries/Methods:** Using non-existent methods or packages. Always `// VERIFY` or check `package.json` / `requirements.txt`.
-3. **Skipping Edge Cases:** Writing the "happy path" and ignoring error handling, timeouts, or data validation.
-4. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-5. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or re-raising.
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Unchecked Payload Cast** | Casting request bodies to TypeScript types without runtime schema validation | Parse request payloads through Zod/Pydantic schemas before business logic |
+| **Silent Error Swallowing** | Catching errors with empty catch blocks or logging without rethrowing | Propagate structured errors with status codes and contextual stack traces |
+| **Unparameterized Query** | Concatenating user inputs into SQL/Prisma query strings | Always use parameterized bindings or type-safe ORM query builders |
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Integration (Anti-Hallucination)
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor` · `api-architect` · `resilience-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
-
-Review these questions before confirming output:
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Are all inputs and boundary payloads validated against schemas (Zod/Pydantic)?
+✅ Are SQL and database queries parameterized with zero string concatenation?
+✅ Are error boundaries and timeout/retry policies explicitly declared?
+✅ Are authentication checks performed before business logic execution?
+✅ Did I verify that imported dependencies exist in package.json/requirements.txt?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
 
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.