tribunal-kit 8.0.0 → 9.0.1

package/.agent/skills/clean-code/SKILL.md

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: clean-code
-description: Clean code mastery. Naming conventions, function design, DRY vs WET, SOLID principles with code examples, refactoring patterns, code smells detection, error handling philosophy, comments that add value, and the art of simplicity. Use when reviewing code quality, refactoring, or establishing coding standards.
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-version: 3.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-07-30
+description: Use when Clean code mastery. Naming conventions, function design, DRY vs WET, SOLID principles with code examples, refactoring patterns, code smells detection, error handling philosophy, comments that add value, and the art of simplicity. Use when reviewing code quality, refactoring, or establishing coding standards.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - codebase-design
   - code-review-checklist
   - tdd-workflow
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
 scripts-binding:
   - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
   - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
@@ -15,25 +15,56 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Clean Code — The Art of Readable Software
 
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `clean-code` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+
+- **Activate when:** Use when Clean code mastery. Naming conventions, function design, DRY vs WET, SOLID principles with code examples, refactoring patterns, code smells detection, error handling philosophy, comments that add value, and the art of simplicity. Use when reviewing code quality, refactoring, or establishing coding standards.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `clean-code` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
 ---
 
-## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
 
-Before refactoring code or evaluating clean code standards, you MUST inspect:
+---
+
+
+## 2026 Code Performance & Logic Invariants
 
-1. Intent-Revealing Naming (Section 25) → Name variables/functions to reveal explicit intent; ban cryptic abbreviations (`d`, `proc`, `u`)
-2. Single-Purpose Functions (Section 95) → Ensure functions perform 1 single task; extract sub-operations if function exceeds ~30 lines
-3. Guard Clause Early Returns (Section 344) → Flatten nested logic (>3 levels) using guard clauses and fail-fast early returns
+1. **Fail-Fast Early Returns**: Flatten nested conditionals (`if ... else if ... else`). Return or throw immediately on validation failure.
+2. **O(1) Data Structures**: Replace repeated `array.find()` or `array.includes()` in loops with `Set.has()` or `Map.get()`.
+3. **Cyclomatic Complexity Cap**: No single function may exceed cyclomatic complexity > 10. Split multi-branch operations into dedicated strategy handlers.
+4. **Pure Core, Imperative Shell**: Keep business calculations pure and deterministic; push network I/O, file access, and mutation to the boundaries.
+5. **Typed Error Hierarchy**: Never throw raw strings or generic `Error`. Throw domain-specific error classes containing structured metadata (`code`, `retryable`, `context`).
 
 ## Hallucination Traps (Read First)
 
 - ❌ Over-abstracting code that is used in only one place -> ✅ Don't DRY single-use code; premature abstraction is worse than duplication
 - ❌ Adding comments that restate what the code does -> ✅ Comments explain WHY, not WHAT; the code explains what
 - ❌ Creating utility functions for trivial one-liners -> ✅ Inline is clearer when the operation is self-documenting
-
----
-
-# Clean Code — The Art of Readable Software
+- ❌ Using `array.find()` inside an `array.filter()` loop (O(N²)) -> ✅ Index into a `Map` first (O(N))
 
 ---
 
@@ -367,91 +398,45 @@ function processUser(user: User) {
 
 ---
 
----
-
-AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
 
-1. **Over-engineering:** Proposing complex abstractions or distributed systems when a simpler approach suffices.
-2. **Hallucinated Libraries/Methods:** Using non-existent methods or packages. Always `// VERIFY` or check `package.json` / `requirements.txt`.
-3. **Skipping Edge Cases:** Writing the "happy path" and ignoring error handling, timeouts, or data validation.
-4. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-5. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or re-raising.
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
 
 ---
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
-
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
 
-Review these questions before confirming output:
-
-```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
-```
-
-### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
-
-**CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-
-- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
-
-## Pre-Flight Checklist
-
-- [ ] Have I reviewed the user's specific constraints and requests?
-- [ ] Have I checked the environment for relevant existing implementations?
-
-## VBC Protocol (Verification-Before-Completion)
-
-You MUST verify existing code signatures and variables before attempting to modify or call them. No hallucination is permitted.
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Hardcoded Secret Pattern** | Committing API keys, tokens, or private salts into source code | Load credentials strictly via runtime environment variables and secret stores |
+| **Prompt Injection Surface** | Directly concatenating untrusted user input into LLM system prompts | Wrap user content in isolated delimiters and strip injection control sequences |
+| **Missing Authorization Check** | Relying only on authentication token presence without checking tenant/object RBAC | Verify user permissions against the specific target record ID before mutation |
 
 ---
 
-## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps
-
-AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
-
-1. **Over-engineering:** Proposing complex abstractions or distributed systems when a simpler approach suffices.
-2. **Hallucinated Libraries/Methods:** Using non-existent methods or packages. Always `// VERIFY` or check `package.json` / `requirements.txt`.
-3. **Skipping Edge Cases:** Writing the "happy path" and ignoring error handling, timeouts, or data validation.
-4. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-5. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or re-raising.
-
----
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Integration (Anti-Hallucination)
+**Active Reviewers:** `security-auditor` · `penetration-tester` · `backend-security-expert`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
-
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
-
-Review these questions before confirming output:
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Are user inputs sanitized and treated as untrusted at system boundaries?
+✅ Are secrets loaded strictly via environment variables with zero hardcoding?
+✅ Is least-privilege enforcement active on APIs, tokens, and storage buckets?
+✅ Are prompt-injection delimiters and sanitizers wrapped around LLM inputs?
+✅ Did I verify encryption in transit and at rest for sensitive customer data?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
 
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agent/skills/cloud-architect/SKILL.md

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: cloud-architect
-description: Production AWS cloud architecture mastery. Service selection (ECS Fargate vs Lambda vs EC2, RDS vs Aurora vs DynamoDB), Terraform IaC patterns with HCL examples, VPC networking design, IAM least privilege, Secrets Manager, CloudWatch observability, cost optimization, and multi-environment AWS Organizations strategy. Golden Path - AWS. Use when architecting cloud infrastructure, writing Terraform, or making AWS service selection decisions.
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-version: 3.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-07-30
+description: Use when Production AWS cloud architecture mastery. Service selection (ECS Fargate vs Lambda vs EC2, RDS vs Aurora vs DynamoDB), Terraform IaC patterns with HCL examples, VPC networking design, IAM least privilege, Secrets Manager, CloudWatch observability, cost optimization, and multi-environment AWS Organizations strategy. Golden Path - AWS. Use when architecting cloud infrastructure, writing Terraform, or making AWS service selection decisions.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - cicd-pro
   - devops-engineer
   - platform-engineer
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
 scripts-binding:
   - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
   - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
@@ -15,15 +15,41 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Cloud Architect — Production AWS Mastery
 
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `cloud-architect` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+
+- **Activate when:** Use when Production AWS cloud architecture mastery. Service selection (ECS Fargate vs Lambda vs EC2, RDS vs Aurora vs DynamoDB), Terraform IaC patterns with HCL examples, VPC networking design, IAM least privilege, Secrets Manager, CloudWatch observability, cost optimization, and multi-environment AWS Organizations strategy. Golden Path - AWS. Use when architecting cloud infrastructure, writing Terraform, or making AWS service selection decisions.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `cloud-architect` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
 ---
 
-## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
 
-Before architecting AWS cloud infrastructure or writing Terraform HCL, you MUST inspect:
+---
 
-1. Dynamic Account ID & Region Resolution (Section 20) → Use `data.aws_caller_identity.current.account_id` and `var.region`; ban hardcoded account IDs or ARNs
-2. Private Subnet Application Placement (Section 23) → Place application compute (ECS, Lambda) strictly in private subnets; only ALB and NAT Gateway live in public subnets
-3. Secrets Manager Secret Injection (Section 21) → Reference secret ARNs from AWS Secrets Manager in ECS task definitions; ban plaintext environment variables for passwords/tokens
 
 ## Hallucination Traps (Read First)
 
@@ -36,8 +62,6 @@ Before architecting AWS cloud infrastructure or writing Terraform HCL, you MUST
 
 ---
 
-# Cloud Architect — Production AWS Mastery
-
 ## 1. Service Selection Matrix
 
 ### Compute
@@ -416,36 +440,45 @@ terraform {
 
 ---
 
-## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
 
-1. **Omitting `data.aws_caller_identity.current.account_id`**: Never hardcode AWS account IDs in Terraform. Use the data source.
-2. **Lambda for database-heavy operations**: Lambda's ephemeral compute model means each invocation opens a new DB connection. Use RDS Proxy for Lambda → RDS patterns.
-3. **Ignoring NAT Gateway costs**: NAT Gateways cost ~$32/month + $0.045/GB. For staging, a single NAT Gateway is fine. For production, one per AZ for HA.
-4. **Security groups as firewalls**: Security groups are stateful. NACLs are stateless. Never use NACLs as your primary defense layer — security groups are the right tool.
-5. **Missing `lifecycle { ignore_changes }` on ECS services**: Without this, Terraform fights with your CI/CD pipeline over the running task definition revision.
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Integration (Anti-Hallucination)
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor` · `cloud-engineer`**
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Silent Pipeline Failure** | Executing shell steps without set -euo pipefail, ignoring errors | Always initialize shell scripts with set -euo pipefail and trap handlers |
+| **Unpinned Dependency Shift** | Installing packages with npm install or using :latest docker tags | Lock dependencies with npm ci / lockfiles and use immutable SHA256 image digests |
+| **Leaking Build Secrets** | Passing secrets as Docker build arguments baked into image layers | Use Docker BuildKit secret mounts (--mount=type=secret) or runtime injection |
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
+---
+
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
+
+**Active Reviewers:** `pipeline-reviewer` · `devops-engineer` · `resilience-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
+
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
 ```
-✅ Are all secrets stored in Secrets Manager (not plaintext env vars)?
-✅ Are application servers in private subnets?
-✅ Are IAM policies scoped to specific resources (no wildcard Resource: "*")?
-✅ Is Terraform state stored in S3 with DynamoDB locking?
-✅ Are CloudWatch alarms defined for error rates AND latency?
-✅ Is auto-rollback configured on the ECS service circuit breaker?
-✅ Are hardcoded account IDs / region strings replaced with data sources?
+✅ Are strict execution modes (set -euo pipefail) active on all scripts?
+✅ Are container images pinned to digest/immutable tags instead of "latest"?
+✅ Are deployment health checks and rollback baselines configured?
+✅ Are CI secrets masked and unexposed to untrusted pull requests?
+✅ Did I verify environment compatibility across target runtimes?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
 
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-
-- ❌ **Forbidden**: Declaring Terraform configuration correct because it "looks right."
-- ✅ **Required**: Run `terraform plan` with zero unexpected changes AND `terraform apply` successfully completes before marking infrastructure work as done.
+- ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agent/skills/cobejs/SKILL.md

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 ---
 name: cobejs
-description: Build lightweight, hardware-accelerated 3D interactive animated globes and web orbs using Cobe WebGL.
-version: 3.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-07-30
+description: Use when Build lightweight, hardware-accelerated 3D interactive animated globes and web orbs using Cobe WebGL.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - 60fps-animation
   - motion-engineering
@@ -15,17 +15,41 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Cobe JS — Lightweight 3D WebGL Globe Visuals
 
----
-
 ## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
 
-Before building WebGL 3D globe components with Cobe, you MUST inspect:
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `cobejs` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+
+- **Activate when:** Use when Build lightweight, hardware-accelerated 3D interactive animated globes and web orbs using Cobe WebGL.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `cobejs` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
 
-1. `package.json` → Verify `cobe` dependency exists
-2. WebGL Context Cleanup (Section 59) → Ensure `globe.destroy()` is called in the `useEffect` unmount cleanup to prevent memory leaks
-3. Canvas Sizing (Section 65) → Match `devicePixelRatio` to high-DPI screens and set `aspectRatio: 1` to prevent visual stretching
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
+---
 
-Integrate ultra-fast, 5KB WebGL interactive globes for landing page hero sections and interactive location maps.
 
 ---
 
@@ -77,27 +101,45 @@ export function InteractiveGlobe() {
 
 ---
 
-## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+---
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
 
-1. **Forgetting Canvas Destroy Cleanup**: Failing to call `globe.destroy()` on component unmount, causing WebGL context leaks.
-2. **Missing `aspectRatio: 1`**: Failing to constrain aspect ratio, causing globe canvas stretching.
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Hallucinated Tool Capabilities** | Assuming an external library or CLI command exists without verification | Run a verification check or verify package.json before referencing tools |
+| **Premature Completion Claim** | Declaring a task finished because code was generated without verification | Execute tests, linters, or terminal commands to provide concrete proof |
+| **Context Bloat Dumping** | Pasting entire multi-thousand-line files into prompt context | Extract targeted excerpts, symbols, and signatures to preserve tokens |
 
 ---
 
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Integration (Anti-Hallucination)
+## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Active reviewers: `frontend-reviewer` · `performance-optimizer`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` · `agent-organizer` · `logic-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
 ```
-✅ Is `globe.destroy()` invoked in the unmount cleanup function?
-✅ Is `devicePixelRatio` set to match high-DPI screens without GPU slowdown?
+✅ Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
+✅ Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
+✅ Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
+✅ Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
+✅ Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
 
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
-
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.