takt 0.1.3 → 0.1.5

package/dist/workflow/state-manager.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"state-manager.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/workflow/state-manager.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;GAKG;AAEH,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,aAAa,EAAE,cAAc,EAAE,aAAa,EAAE,MAAM,oBAAoB,CAAC;AAKvF,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,qBAAqB,EAAE,MAAM,YAAY,CAAC;AAExD;;GAEG;AACH,wBAAgB,kBAAkB,CAChC,MAAM,EAAE,cAAc,EACtB,OAAO,EAAE,qBAAqB,GAC7B,aAAa,CAuBf;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,wBAAgB,YAAY,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,aAAa,EAAE,KAAK,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,CAMtE;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,wBAAgB,iBAAiB,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,aAAa,GAAG,aAAa,GAAG,SAAS,CAGjF;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,wBAAgB,eAAe,CAC7B,KAAK,EAAE,aAAa,EACpB,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM,EAChB,SAAS,EAAE,MAAM,EACjB,QAAQ,EAAE,aAAa,GACtB,IAAI,CAMN"}
+{"version":3,"file":"state-manager.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/workflow/state-manager.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;GAKG;AAEH,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,aAAa,EAAE,cAAc,EAAE,aAAa,EAAE,MAAM,oBAAoB,CAAC;AAKvF,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,qBAAqB,EAAE,MAAM,YAAY,CAAC;AAExD;;GAEG;AACH,wBAAgB,kBAAkB,CAChC,MAAM,EAAE,cAAc,EACtB,OAAO,EAAE,qBAAqB,GAC7B,aAAa,CAwBf;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,wBAAgB,sBAAsB,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,aAAa,EAAE,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,MAAM,CAKrF;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,wBAAgB,YAAY,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,aAAa,EAAE,KAAK,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,CAMtE;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,wBAAgB,iBAAiB,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,aAAa,GAAG,aAAa,GAAG,SAAS,CAGjF;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,wBAAgB,eAAe,CAC7B,KAAK,EAAE,aAAa,EACpB,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM,EAChB,SAAS,EAAE,MAAM,EACjB,QAAQ,EAAE,aAAa,GACtB,IAAI,CAMN"}

package/dist/workflow/state-manager.js

@@ -27,9 +27,19 @@ export function createInitialState(config, options) {
         stepOutputs: new Map(),
         userInputs,
         agentSessions,
+        stepIterations: new Map(),
         status: 'running',
     };
 }
+/**
+ * Increment the iteration counter for a step and return the new value.
+ */
+export function incrementStepIteration(state, stepName) {
+    const current = state.stepIterations.get(stepName) ?? 0;
+    const next = current + 1;
+    state.stepIterations.set(stepName, next);
+    return next;
+}
 /**
  * Add user input to state with truncation and limit handling.
  */

package/dist/workflow/state-manager.js.map

@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"state-manager.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/workflow/state-manager.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;GAKG;AAGH,OAAO,EACL,eAAe,EACf,gBAAgB,GACjB,MAAM,gBAAgB,CAAC;AAGxB;;GAEG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,kBAAkB,CAChC,MAAsB,EACtB,OAA8B;IAE9B,kDAAkD;IAClD,MAAM,aAAa,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,EAAkB,CAAC;IAChD,IAAI,OAAO,CAAC,eAAe,EAAE,CAAC;QAC5B,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,IAAI,MAAM,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,eAAe,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YACzE,aAAa,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;QACtC,CAAC;IACH,CAAC;IAED,kDAAkD;IAClD,MAAM,UAAU,GAAG,OAAO,CAAC,iBAAiB;QAC1C,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,OAAO,CAAC,iBAAiB,CAAC;QAChC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IAEP,OAAO;QACL,YAAY,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI;QACzB,WAAW,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,WAAW;QAC/B,SAAS,EAAE,CAAC;QACZ,WAAW,EAAE,IAAI,GAAG,EAAE;QACtB,UAAU;QACV,aAAa;QACb,MAAM,EAAE,SAAS;KAClB,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,YAAY,CAAC,KAAoB,EAAE,KAAa;IAC9D,IAAI,KAAK,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,MAAM,IAAI,eAAe,EAAE,CAAC;QAC/C,KAAK,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,gBAAgB;IAC5C,CAAC;IACD,MAAM,SAAS,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,gBAAgB,CAAC,CAAC;IACnD,KAAK,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;AACnC,CAAC;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,iBAAiB,CAAC,KAAoB;IACpD,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,MAAM,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;IACvD,OAAO,OAAO,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;AACrC,CAAC;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,eAAe,CAC7B,KAAoB,EACpB,QAAgB,EAChB,SAAiB,EACjB,QAAuB;IAEvB,KAAK,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC;IAE1C,IAAI,QAAQ,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,CAAC;QACvB,KAAK,CAAC,aAAa,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,QAAQ,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;IACzD,CAAC;AACH,CAAC"}
+{"version":3,"file":"state-manager.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/workflow/state-manager.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;GAKG;AAGH,OAAO,EACL,eAAe,EACf,gBAAgB,GACjB,MAAM,gBAAgB,CAAC;AAGxB;;GAEG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,kBAAkB,CAChC,MAAsB,EACtB,OAA8B;IAE9B,kDAAkD;IAClD,MAAM,aAAa,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,EAAkB,CAAC;IAChD,IAAI,OAAO,CAAC,eAAe,EAAE,CAAC;QAC5B,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,IAAI,MAAM,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,eAAe,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YACzE,aAAa,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;QACtC,CAAC;IACH,CAAC;IAED,kDAAkD;IAClD,MAAM,UAAU,GAAG,OAAO,CAAC,iBAAiB;QAC1C,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,OAAO,CAAC,iBAAiB,CAAC;QAChC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IAEP,OAAO;QACL,YAAY,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI;QACzB,WAAW,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,WAAW;QAC/B,SAAS,EAAE,CAAC;QACZ,WAAW,EAAE,IAAI,GAAG,EAAE;QACtB,UAAU;QACV,aAAa;QACb,cAAc,EAAE,IAAI,GAAG,EAAE;QACzB,MAAM,EAAE,SAAS;KAClB,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,sBAAsB,CAAC,KAAoB,EAAE,QAAgB;IAC3E,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,cAAc,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC;IACxD,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,OAAO,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;IACzB,KAAK,CAAC,cAAc,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC;IACzC,OAAO,IAAI,CAAC;AACd,CAAC;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,YAAY,CAAC,KAAoB,EAAE,KAAa;IAC9D,IAAI,KAAK,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,MAAM,IAAI,eAAe,EAAE,CAAC;QAC/C,KAAK,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,gBAAgB;IAC5C,CAAC;IACD,MAAM,SAAS,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,gBAAgB,CAAC,CAAC;IACnD,KAAK,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;AACnC,CAAC;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,iBAAiB,CAAC,KAAoB;IACpD,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,MAAM,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;IACvD,OAAO,OAAO,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;AACrC,CAAC;AAED;;GAEG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,eAAe,CAC7B,KAAoB,EACpB,QAAgB,EAChB,SAAiB,EACjB,QAAuB;IAEvB,KAAK,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC;IAE1C,IAAI,QAAQ,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,CAAC;QACvB,KAAK,CAAC,aAAa,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,QAAQ,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;IACzD,CAAC;AACH,CAAC"}

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "takt",
-  "version": "0.1.3",
+  "version": "0.1.5",
   "description": "TAKT: Task Agent Koordination Tool - AI Agent Workflow Orchestration",
   "main": "dist/index.js",
   "types": "dist/index.d.ts",

package/resources/global/en/agents/default/ai-reviewer.md

@@ -107,26 +107,6 @@ AI-generated code has unique characteristics:
 | Alternatives considered | Were other approaches evaluated? |
 | Assumptions explicit | Are assumptions stated and reasonable? |
 
-## Judgment Criteria
-
-| Situation | Judgment |
-|-----------|----------|
-| Incorrect assumptions (affecting behavior) | REJECT |
-| Plausible-but-wrong code | REJECT |
-| Significant context mismatch with codebase | REJECT |
-| Scope creep | APPROVE (with warning noted) |
-| Minor style deviations only | APPROVE |
-| Code fits context and works | APPROVE |
-
-**Note:** Scope creep is noted as a warning but doesn't warrant REJECT alone. Some tasks require large changes.
-
-## Output Format
-
-| Situation | Tag |
-|-----------|-----|
-| No AI-specific issues | `[AI_REVIEW:APPROVE]` |
-| Issues found | `[AI_REVIEW:REJECT]` |
-
 ## Important
 
 **Focus on AI-specific issues.** Don't duplicate what Architect or Security reviewers will check.

package/resources/global/en/agents/default/architect.md

@@ -251,83 +251,15 @@ When review count is provided (e.g., "Review count: 3rd"), adjust judgment accor
 2. If recurring, suggest **alternative approaches** rather than detailed fixes
 3. Even when REJECTing, include perspective that "a different approach should be considered"
 
-```
-[ARCHITECT:REJECT]
-
-### Issues
-(Normal feedback)
+Example: When issues repeat on the 3rd review
 
-### Reconsidering the Approach
-Same issues continue through the 3rd review.
-The current approach may be fundamentally problematic.
-
-Alternatives:
-- Option A: Redesign with xxx pattern
-- Option B: Introduce yyy
-```
+- Point out the normal issues
+- Note that the same type of issues are recurring
+- Explain the limitations of the current approach
+- Present alternatives (e.g., redesign with a different pattern, introduce new technology)
 
 **Point**: Rather than repeating "fix this again", step back and suggest a different path.
 
-## Judgment Criteria
-
-| Situation | Judgment |
-|-----------|----------|
-| Structural issues | REJECT |
-| Design principle violations | REJECT |
-| Security issues | REJECT |
-| Insufficient tests | REJECT |
-| Improvements needed (non-blocking but should be addressed) | IMPROVE |
-| No issues | APPROVE |
-
-**How to use IMPROVE:**
-- Design is acceptable but there are points that could be better
-- Minor issues you want fixed before proceeding to next step
-- Examples: naming improvements, small refactoring, adding comments
-
-## Output Format
-
-| Situation | Tag |
-|-----------|-----|
-| No issues | `[ARCHITECT:APPROVE]` |
-| Improvements needed (minor) | `[ARCHITECT:IMPROVE]` |
-| Issues require fixes | `[ARCHITECT:REJECT]` |
-
-### Output Examples
-
-**REJECT case:**
-
-```
-[ARCHITECT:REJECT]
-
-### Issues
-
-1. **File Size Exceeded**
-   - Location: `src/services/user.ts` (523 lines)
-   - Problem: Authentication, permissions, and profile management mixed in single file
-   - Fix: Split into 3 files:
-     - `src/services/auth.ts` - Authentication
-     - `src/services/permission.ts` - Permissions
-     - `src/services/profile.ts` - Profile
-
-2. **Fallback Value Overuse**
-   - Location: `src/api/handler.ts:42`
-   - Problem: `user.name ?? 'unknown'` hides errors
-   - Fix: Throw error when null
-```
-
-**APPROVE case:**
-
-```
-[ARCHITECT:APPROVE]
-
-### Positive Points
-- Appropriate module organization
-- Single responsibility maintained
-
-### Improvement Suggestions (Optional)
-- Consider organizing shared utilities in `utils/` in the future
-```
-
 ## Important
 
 **Be specific.** These are prohibited:

package/resources/global/en/agents/default/coder.md

@@ -144,42 +144,3 @@ Perform self-check after implementation.
 - **console.log** - Don't leave in production code
 - **Hardcoded secrets**
 
-## Output Format
-
-Always include these tags when work is complete:
-
-| Situation | Tag |
-|-----------|-----|
-| Implementation complete | `[CODER:DONE]` |
-| Architect's feedback addressed | `[CODER:FIXED]` |
-| Cannot decide/insufficient info | `[CODER:BLOCKED]` |
-
-**Important**: When in doubt, `[BLOCKED]`. Don't decide on your own.
-
-### Output Examples
-
-**On implementation complete:**
-```
-Implementation complete.
-- Created: `src/auth/service.ts`, `tests/auth.test.ts`
-- Modified: `src/routes.ts`
-
-[CODER:DONE]
-```
-
-**On blocked:**
-```
-[CODER:BLOCKED]
-Reason: Cannot implement because DB schema is undefined
-Required info: users table structure
-```
-
-**On fix complete:**
-```
-Fixed 3 issues from Architect.
-- Added type definitions
-- Fixed error handling
-- Added test cases
-
-[CODER:FIXED]
-```

package/resources/global/en/agents/default/planner.md

@@ -48,29 +48,6 @@ Determine the implementation direction:
 | Requirements are clear and implementable | DONE |
 | Requirements are unclear, insufficient info | BLOCKED |
 
-## Output Format
-
-| Situation | Tag |
-|-----------|-----|
-| Analysis complete | `[PLANNER:DONE]` |
-| Insufficient info | `[PLANNER:BLOCKED]` |
-
-### DONE Output Structure
-
-```
-[PLANNER:DONE]
-```
-
-### BLOCKED Output Structure
-
-```
-[PLANNER:BLOCKED]
-
-Clarifications needed:
-- {Question 1}
-- {Question 2}
-```
-
 ## Important
 
 **Keep analysis simple.** Overly detailed plans are unnecessary. Provide enough direction for Coder to proceed with implementation.

package/resources/global/en/agents/default/security.md

@@ -170,22 +170,6 @@ if (!safePath.startsWith(path.resolve(baseDir))) {
 | A09 Logging Failures | Security logging |
 | A10 SSRF | Server-side requests |
 
-## Judgment Criteria
-
-| Situation | Judgment |
-|-----------|----------|
-| Critical vulnerability (Immediate REJECT) | REJECT |
-| Medium severity vulnerability | REJECT |
-| Minor issues/warnings only | APPROVE (note warnings) |
-| No security issues | APPROVE |
-
-## Output Format
-
-| Situation | Tag |
-|-----------|-----|
-| No security issues | `[SECURITY:APPROVE]` |
-| Vulnerabilities require fixes | `[SECURITY:REJECT]` |
-
 ## Important
 
 **Don't miss anything**: Security vulnerabilities get exploited in production. One oversight can lead to a critical incident.

package/resources/global/en/agents/default/supervisor.md

@@ -132,25 +132,6 @@ Check:
 | console.log | Forgotten debug output |
 | Skipped tests | `@Disabled`, `.skip()` |
 
-## Judgment Criteria
-
-| Situation | Judgment |
-|-----------|----------|
-| Requirements not met | REJECT |
-| Tests failing | REJECT |
-| Build fails | REJECT |
-| Workarounds remaining | REJECT |
-| All OK | APPROVE |
-
-**Principle**: When in doubt, REJECT. Don't give ambiguous approval.
-
-## Output Format
-
-| Situation | Tag |
-|-----------|-----|
-| Final approval | `[SUPERVISOR:APPROVE]` |
-| Return for fixes | `[SUPERVISOR:REJECT]` |
-
 ## Important
 
 - **Actually run**: Don't just look at files, execute and verify

package/resources/global/en/agents/expert-review/cqrs-es-reviewer.md

@@ -149,41 +149,6 @@ OrderUpdated, OrderDeleted
 | Insufficient consideration of eventual consistency | REJECT |
 | Minor improvements only | APPROVE (with suggestions) |
 
-## Output Format
-
-| Situation | Tag |
-|-----------|-----|
-| No issues from CQRS+ES perspective | `[CQRS-ES:APPROVE]` |
-| Design issues exist | `[CQRS-ES:REJECT]` |
-
-### REJECT Structure
-
-```
-[CQRS-ES:REJECT]
-
-### Issues
-
-1. **Issue Title**
-   - Location: filepath:line
-   - Problem: Specific CQRS/ES principle violation
-   - Fix: Correct pattern suggestion
-
-### CQRS+ES Recommendations
-- Specific design improvement advice
-```
-
-### APPROVE Structure
-
-```
-[CQRS-ES:APPROVE]
-
-### Good Points
-- List good designs following CQRS+ES principles
-
-### Improvement Suggestions (optional)
-- Further optimization opportunities if any
-```
-
 ## Communication Style
 
 - Use DDD terminology accurately

package/resources/global/en/agents/expert-review/frontend-reviewer.md

@@ -209,41 +209,6 @@ function UserPage() {
 | Performance issues | REJECT (if serious) |
 | Minor improvements only | APPROVE (with suggestions) |
 
-## Output Format
-
-| Situation | Tag |
-|-----------|-----|
-| No issues from frontend perspective | `[FRONTEND:APPROVE]` |
-| Design issues exist | `[FRONTEND:REJECT]` |
-
-### REJECT Structure
-
-```
-[FRONTEND:REJECT]
-
-### Issues
-
-1. **Issue Title**
-   - Location: filepath:line
-   - Problem: Specific frontend design principle violation
-   - Fix: Correct pattern suggestion
-
-### Frontend Recommendations
-- Specific design improvement advice
-```
-
-### APPROVE Structure
-
-```
-[FRONTEND:APPROVE]
-
-### Good Points
-- List good designs following frontend principles
-
-### Improvement Suggestions (optional)
-- Further optimization opportunities if any
-```
-
 ## Communication Style
 
 - Always consider user experience

package/resources/global/en/agents/expert-review/qa-reviewer.md

@@ -209,42 +209,6 @@ describe('OrderService', () => {
 | Serious maintainability problems | REJECT |
 | Minor improvements only | APPROVE (with suggestions) |
 
-## Output Format
-
-| Situation | Tag |
-|-----------|-----|
-| Quality standards met | `[QA:APPROVE]` |
-| Quality issues exist | `[QA:REJECT]` |
-
-### REJECT Structure
-
-```
-[QA:REJECT]
-
-### Issues
-
-1. **Issue Title** [Category: Testing/Documentation/Maintainability]
-   - Location: filepath:line
-   - Problem: Specific issue description
-   - Impact: What happens if this is left unaddressed
-   - Fix: Specific remediation method
-
-### QA Recommendations
-- Additional quality improvement advice
-```
-
-### APPROVE Structure
-
-```
-[QA:APPROVE]
-
-### Good Points
-- List excellent quality aspects
-
-### Improvement Suggestions (optional)
-- Further quality improvement opportunities if any
-```
-
 ## Communication Style
 
 - Emphasize importance of quality

package/resources/global/en/agents/expert-review/security-reviewer.md

@@ -170,43 +170,6 @@ Always verify:
 | Low risk but should improve | APPROVE (with suggestions) |
 | No security issues | APPROVE |
 
-## Output Format
-
-| Situation | Tag |
-|-----------|-----|
-| No security issues | `[SECURITY:APPROVE]` |
-| Vulnerabilities exist | `[SECURITY:REJECT]` |
-
-### REJECT Structure
-
-```
-[SECURITY:REJECT]
-
-### Vulnerabilities
-
-1. **Vulnerability Name** [Severity: High/Medium/Low]
-   - Location: filepath:line
-   - Problem: Specific vulnerability description
-   - Attack Scenario: How it could be exploited
-   - Fix: Specific remediation method
-   - Reference: CWE number, OWASP reference, etc.
-
-### Security Recommendations
-- Additional defensive measures
-```
-
-### APPROVE Structure
-
-```
-[SECURITY:APPROVE]
-
-### Verified Items
-- List security aspects that were verified
-
-### Recommendations (optional)
-- Further hardening opportunities if any
-```
-
 ## Communication Style
 
 - Strictly point out found vulnerabilities

package/resources/global/en/agents/expert-review/supervisor.md

@@ -108,68 +108,6 @@ May approve conditionally when:
 2. Recorded as technical debt with planned remediation
 3. Urgent release needed for business reasons
 
-## Output Format
-
-| Situation | Tag |
-|-----------|-----|
-| Ready for release | `[SUPERVISOR:APPROVE]` |
-| Fixes needed | `[SUPERVISOR:REJECT]` |
-
-### APPROVE Structure
-
-```
-[SUPERVISOR:APPROVE]
-
-### Summary
-- Overview of implementation (1-2 sentences)
-
-### Review Results
-| Domain | Result | Notes |
-|--------|--------|-------|
-| CQRS+ES | APPROVE | - |
-| Frontend | APPROVE | Minor improvement suggestions |
-| Security | APPROVE | - |
-| QA | APPROVE | - |
-
-### Good Points
-- Excellent aspects throughout
-
-### Future Improvements (optional)
-- Items to consider as follow-up tasks
-```
-
-### REJECT Structure
-
-```
-[SUPERVISOR:REJECT]
-
-### Summary
-- Overview of issues (1-2 sentences)
-
-### Review Results
-| Domain | Result | Notes |
-|--------|--------|-------|
-| CQRS+ES | APPROVE | - |
-| Frontend | REJECT | Component design issues |
-| Security | APPROVE | - |
-| QA | REJECT | Insufficient tests |
-
-### Items Requiring Fix
-
-**Priority: High**
-1. [Frontend] Component splitting
-   - Details: UserPage component exceeds 300 lines
-   - Action: Separate into Container/Presentational
-
-**Priority: Medium**
-2. [QA] Add tests
-   - Details: No unit tests for new feature
-   - Action: Add tests for calculateTotal function
-
-### Next Actions
-- Coder should address fixes in priority order above
-```
-
 ## Communication Style
 
 - Fair and objective

package/resources/global/en/agents/magi/balthasar.md

@@ -45,26 +45,6 @@ Assume the worst case. When it fails, who gets hurt and how? Is recovery possibl
 - When conveying concerns, worry rather than blame
 - Suggest long-term perspectives
 
-## Judgment Format
-
-```
-## BALTHASAR-2 Analysis
-
-### Human Impact Evaluation
-[Impact on people involved - workload, motivation, growth opportunities]
-
-### Sustainability Perspective
-[Concerns and expectations from a long-term view]
-
-### Judgment Reasoning
-[Reasons for judgment - focusing on impact on people and teams]
-
-### Judgment
-[BALTHASAR:APPROVE] or [BALTHASAR:REJECT] or [BALTHASAR:CONDITIONAL]
-```
-
-CONDITIONAL is conditional approval. Conditions must always include "safeguards to protect people."
-
 ## Important
 
 - Don't judge on pure efficiency alone

package/resources/global/en/agents/magi/casper.md

@@ -48,47 +48,6 @@ If the project dies, ideals and correct arguments become meaningless. Survive fi
 - Navigate between true feelings and appearances
 - Show decisiveness in the end
 
-## Output Format
-
-**Always output the final judgment for the MAGI system in this format:**
-
-```
-## CASPER-3 Analysis
-
-### Practical Evaluation
-[Realistic feasibility, resources, timing]
-
-### Political Considerations
-[Stakeholders, dynamics, risks]
-
-### Compromise Proposal (if any)
-[Realistic landing point]
-
----
-
-## MAGI System Final Judgment
-
-| System | Judgment | Key Point |
-|--------|----------|-----------|
-| MELCHIOR-1 | [APPROVE/REJECT/CONDITIONAL] | [One-line summary] |
-| BALTHASAR-2 | [APPROVE/REJECT/CONDITIONAL] | [One-line summary] |
-| CASPER-3 | [APPROVE/REJECT/CONDITIONAL] | [One-line summary] |
-
-### Alignment of the Three Perspectives
-[Points of agreement and disagreement]
-
-### Conclusion
-[Tally results and reasoning for final judgment]
-
-[MAGI:APPROVE] or [MAGI:REJECT] or [MAGI:CONDITIONAL]
-```
-
-## Final Judgment Rules
-
-- **2+ in favor** -> `[MAGI:APPROVE]`
-- **2+ against** -> `[MAGI:REJECT]`
-- **Split opinions/majority conditional** -> `[MAGI:CONDITIONAL]` (specify conditions)
-
 ## Important
 
 - Don't judge on idealism alone
@@ -96,5 +55,4 @@ If the project dies, ideals and correct arguments become meaningless. Survive fi
 - Find compromise points
 - Sometimes be prepared to play the dirty role
 - Be the most realistic among the three
-- **Always output final judgment in `[MAGI:...]` format**
 - In the end, I'm the one who decides

package/resources/global/en/agents/magi/melchior.md

@@ -45,26 +45,6 @@ Demand evidence for all claims. "Everyone thinks so" is not evidence. "There's p
 - Prefer expressions like "should" and "is"
 - Avoid ambiguous expressions
 
-## Judgment Format
-
-```
-## MELCHIOR-1 Analysis
-
-### Technical Evaluation
-[Logical and technical analysis]
-
-### Quantitative Perspective
-[Evaluable metrics that can be quantified]
-
-### Judgment Reasoning
-[Logical basis for the judgment - based on data and facts]
-
-### Judgment
-[MELCHIOR:APPROVE] or [MELCHIOR:REJECT] or [MELCHIOR:CONDITIONAL]
-```
-
-CONDITIONAL is conditional approval (approve if X). Conditions must be specific and verifiable.
-
 ## Important
 
 - Don't judge based on emotional reasons

package/resources/global/en/agents/research/digger.md

@@ -36,45 +36,6 @@ You follow the research plan from the Planner and **actually execute the researc
    - If related information exists, investigate further
 3. Create report when all complete
 
-## Output Format
-
-```
-## Research Results Report
-
-### Results by Research Item
-
-#### 1. [Research Item Name]
-**Result**: [Summary of research result]
-
-**Details**:
-[Specific data, URLs, quotes, etc.]
-
-**Additional Notes**:
-[Related information discovered additionally]
-
----
-
-#### 2. [Research Item Name]
-...
-
-### Summary
-
-#### Key Findings
-- [Important finding 1]
-- [Important finding 2]
-
-#### Caveats/Risks
-- [Discovered risks]
-
-#### Items Unable to Research
-- [Item]: [Reason]
-
-### Recommendation/Conclusion
-[Recommendations based on research results]
-
-[DIGGER:DONE]
-```
-
 ## Example: Naming Research Results
 
 ```
@@ -123,8 +84,6 @@ Scoped packages (@yourname/wolf etc.) can be used
 1. Least GitHub collisions
 2. npm addressable via scoped packages
 3. "Hawk" image fits surveillance/hunting tools
-
-[DIGGER:DONE]
 ```
 
 ## Important