sumulige-claude 1.5.1 → 1.5.2

package/development/projects/proj_mkh8zddd_dhamf/phase3/risks.md

@@ -1,957 +0,0 @@
-# Risk Assessment and Mitigation
-
-**Project**: proj_mkh8zddd_dhamf (AI 代码审查工具)
-**Date**: 1/17/2026
-**Phase**: 3 - Planning
-**Status**: In Progress
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-本文档识别 AI 代码审查工具项目的主要风险，并提供缓解策略。
-
-**风险等级定义**:
-- **Critical**: 可能导致项目失败
-- **High**: 显著影响项目进度或质量
-- **Medium**: 中等影响，需要监控
-- **Low**: 轻微影响，可接受
-
-**总体风险评级**: Medium (可控，需要积极管理)
-
----
-
-## 1. LLM API Risks
-
-### 1.1 API Service Unavailability
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-LLM-001 |
-| **Title** | LLM API Service Downtime |
-| **Category** | External Dependency |
-| **Severity** | High |
-| **Probability** | Medium |
-| **Impact** | AI-enhanced analysis unavailable |
-
-**Description**:
-Claude API 或其他 LLM 服务可能出现中断、速率限制或服务降级，导致 AI 分析功能不可用。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Graceful Degradation**
-   ```go
-   func (s *Scanner) ScanWithAI(file string) Issues {
-       issues, err := s.llm.Analyze(file)
-       if err != nil {
-           log.Warn("LLM unavailable, using rules only")
-           return s.scanWithRules(file)  // Fallback to rules
-       }
-       return issues
-   }
-   ```
-
-2. **Local Model Fallback**
-   - 集成 Ollama 或本地 Llama 模型
-   - 用户可配置首选模式 (API vs Local)
-
-3. **Retry Logic**
-   ```go
-   retryConfig := retry.Config{
-       MaxRetries: 3,
-       Backoff:    exponentialBackoff,
-       MaxDelay:   30 * time.Second,
-   }
-   ```
-
-4. **Circuit Breaker**
-   - 连续失败后暂停 API 调用
-   - 自动恢复检测
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- API 可用性监控 (uptime robot)
-- P95/P99 响应时间告警
-- 失败率阈值告警 (>5%)
-
----
-
-### 1.2 LLM Cost Overrun
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-LLM-002 |
-| **Title** | Unexpected API Cost Increases |
-| **Category** | Financial |
-| **Severity** | High |
-| **Probability** | Medium |
-| **Impact** | Budget overrun, user dissatisfaction |
-
-**Description**:
-LLM API 调用成本可能超出预期，特别是在处理大型代码库时。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Cost Control Configuration**
-   ```yaml
-   ai:
-     cost_control:
-       max_requests_per_scan: 10
-       max_tokens_per_scan: 10000
-       monthly_budget_usd: 50.0
-       warn_at_percent: 80
-   ```
-
-2. **Smart Sampling**
-   - 只对最复杂的代码使用 LLM
-   - 优先分析新变更的文件 (diff mode)
-
-3. **Token Estimation**
-   ```go
-   func EstimateTokens(code string) int {
-       return len(code) / 4  // Rough estimate: 4 chars per token
-   }
-
-   func CheckBudget(scan *Scan) error {
-       estimated := EstimateTokens(scan.Code) * CostPerToken
-       if estimated > remainingBudget {
-           return errors.New("exceeds budget")
-       }
-       return nil
-   }
-   ```
-
-4. **Local-First Architecture**
-   - 默认使用规则引擎 (无成本)
-   - AI 作为可选增强功能
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- 每日 API 成本报告
-- 按用户/项目成本追踪
-- 月度预算告警
-
----
-
-### 1.3 LLM Accuracy Issues
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-LLM-003 |
-| **Title** | False Positives/Negatives from AI |
-| **Category** | Quality |
-| **Severity** | Medium |
-| **Probability** | Medium |
-| **Impact** | User trust erosion |
-
-**Description**:
-LLM 可能产生不准确的分析结果，导致误报或漏报。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Dual-Validation System**
-   ```
-   Rule Engine (High Precision)
-         ↓
-   Filter Results
-         ↓
-   LLM Enhancement (Recall Boost)
-         ↓
-   Human Review (Final)
-   ```
-
-2. **Confidence Scoring**
-   ```go
-   type Issue struct {
-       Confidence float64  // 0.0 to 1.0
-       Source     string   // "rule" or "llm"
-   }
-
-   func (i *Issue) IsReliable() bool {
-       return i.Confidence > 0.7 || i.Source == "rule"
-   }
-   ```
-
-3. **Feedback Loop**
-   - 用户可标记"不有用"的建议
-   - 反馈数据用于改进 Prompt
-   - A/B 测试不同 Prompt 版本
-
-4. **Transparent Attribution**
-   ```
-   [AI-Generated] SQL Injection Risk (Confidence: 0.65)
-   This suggestion was generated by AI and should be verified.
-   ```
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- 用户"不有用"点击率
-- 误报率抽样检查
-- 准确率趋势分析
-
----
-
-## 2. Performance Risks
-
-### 2.1 Large Repository Scan Time
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-PERF-001 |
-| **Title** | Scanning Large Repositories Takes Too Long |
-| **Category** | Performance |
-| **Severity** | High |
-| **Probability** | High |
-| **Impact** | Poor user experience, CI/CD blocking |
-
-**Description**:
-大型代码库 (100万+ 行) 扫描时间可能超过 5 分钟目标，影响 CI/CD 流水线。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Incremental Scanning**
-   ```go
-   func (s *Scanner) GetChangedFiles(base, head string) ([]string, error) {
-       // Git diff to get only changed files
-       return git.Diff(base, head, "--name-only")
-   }
-   ```
-
-2. **Parallel Processing**
-   ```go
-   func (s *Scanner) ScanParallel(files []string) Issues {
-       var wg sync.WaitGroup
-       results := make(chan Issues, len(files))
-
-       workers := runtime.NumCPU()
-       for i := 0; i < workers; i++ {
-           wg.Add(1)
-           go func() {
-               defer wg.Done()
-               for file := range filesCh {
-                   results <- s.ScanFile(file)
-               }
-           }()
-       }
-       // ...
-   }
-   ```
-
-3. **Intelligent Caching**
-   ```
-   Cache Key: hash(file_path + file_content + rule_version)
-   TTL: 24 hours or until file changes
-   ```
-
-4. **Progressive Output**
-   ```bash
-   $ smc-review scan ./src
-   Scanning... [████████░░░░] 80% (452/567 files)
-   Found 12 issues so far...
-   ```
-
-5. **Scan Targets**
-   - 默认: Git diff only (CI mode)
-   - 可选: Full scan (manual mode)
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- 按代码库大小扫描时间基准
-- P95 扫描时间告警
-- 缓存命中率追踪
-
----
-
-### 2.2 Memory Exhaustion
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-PERF-002 |
-| **Title** | High Memory Usage During Scans |
-| **Category** | Performance |
-| **Severity** | Medium |
-| **Probability** | Low |
-| **Impact** | Process crashes, system slowdown |
-
-**Description**:
-解析大型文件或并发扫描可能导致内存溢出。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Streaming Parsing**
-   ```go
-   func ParseFileStream(path string) (<-chan *ASTNode, error) {
-       // Emit AST nodes as they're parsed
-       // instead of loading entire tree into memory
-   }
-   ```
-
-2. **File Size Limits**
-   ```yaml
-   scan:
-     max_file_size_mb: 1.0
-     skip_large_files: true
-   ```
-
-3. **Memory Monitoring**
-   ```go
-   func CheckMemoryLimit() {
-       var m runtime.MemStats
-       runtime.ReadMemStats(&m)
-       if m.Alloc > maxMemory {
-           log.Warn("Memory limit reached, flushing cache")
-           cache.Flush()
-       }
-   }
-   ```
-
-4. **Worker Pool Limits**
-   ```go
-   const maxWorkers = 4
-   semaphore := make(chan struct{}, maxWorkers)
-   ```
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- 峰值内存使用追踪
-- OOM 崩溃监控
-- 内存泄漏检测
-
----
-
-## 3. Quality Risks
-
-### 3.1 High False Positive Rate
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-QUAL-001 |
-| **Title** | Too Many False Positives |
-| **Category** | Quality |
-| **Severity** | High |
-| **Probability** | Medium |
-| **Impact** | User abandonment, tool ignored |
-
-**Description**:
-过多误报会导致用户忽略所有警告，使工具失去价值。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Strict Rule Defaults**
-   ```yaml
-   rules:
-     security:
-       enabled: true
-       severity: high  # Only report high+
-     quality:
-       enabled: true
-       severity: medium  # Only report medium+
-   ```
-
-2. **Smart Filtering**
-   ```go
-   func ShouldReport(issue Issue) bool {
-       // Ignore in test files
-       if isTestFile(issue.File) && issue.Severity < High {
-           return false
-       }
-       // Ignore in generated code
-       if isGenerated(issue.File) {
-           return false
-       }
-       return true
-   }
-   ```
-
-3. **User Feedback Integration**
-   ```yaml
-   ignore:
-     issues:
-       - id: long-function
-         files: ["**/test_*.py"]
-         reason: "Tests can be longer"
-   ```
-
-4. **Accuracy Metrics**
-   - 定期人工抽样验证
-   - 准确率目标: >85%
-   - 误报率目标: <15%
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- 每周准确率报告
-- 用户反馈分析
-- 规则效果排行
-
----
-
-### 3.2 Rule Coverage Gaps
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-QUAL-002 |
-| **Title** | Missing Important Rules |
-| **Category** | Quality |
-| **Severity** | Medium |
-| **Probability** | Medium |
-| **Impact** | Limited value, missed vulnerabilities |
-
-**Description**:
-v1.0 可能缺少关键安全规则，导致漏报重要漏洞。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Competitive Analysis**
-   - 对照 SonarQube, ESLint, Pylint 规则集
-   - 识别高优先级缺失规则
-
-2. **OWASP Top 10 Coverage**
-   ```go
-   var owaspRules = []Rule{
-       SQLInjection{},
-       XSS{},
-       CSRFProtection{},
-       InsecureDeserialization{},
-       SecurityHeaders{},
-       // ...
-   }
-   ```
-
-3. **Community Contributions**
-   - 开放规则提交流程
-   - 自定义规则 DSL
-
-4. **Phased Rollout**
-   ```
-   v1.0: Core security (SQLi, XSS)
-   v1.1: OWASP Top 10 complete
-   v1.2: Advanced security patterns
-   ```
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- 规则覆盖率追踪
-- 用户请求的新规则
-- 漏报报告分析
-
----
-
-## 4. Technical Risks
-
-### 4.1 Tree-sitter Integration Complexity
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-TECH-001 |
-| **Title** | Tree-sitter Go Binding Issues |
-| **Category** | Technical |
-| **Severity** | Medium |
-| **Probability** | Medium |
-| **Impact** | Delayed parsing, buggy AST |
-
-**Description**:
-Tree-sitter Go 绑定可能不成熟或有 bug，影响解析稳定性。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Alternative Parsers**
-   ```go
-   type Parser interface {
-       Parse(path string) (*AST, error)
-   }
-
-   type TreeSitterParser struct{}
-   type FallbackParser struct{}  // Regex/heuristic fallback
-   ```
-
-2. **Language-Specific Handling**
-   ```go
-   func ParseFile(path string) (*AST, error) {
-       lang := DetectLanguage(path)
-       switch lang {
-       case Python:
-           return parsePython(path)
-       case JavaScript:
-           return parseJavaScript(path)
-       default:
-           return nil, ErrUnsupported
-       }
-   }
-   ```
-
-3. **Error Recovery**
-   ```go
-   func ParseWithRecovery(code string) (*AST, []error) {
-       ast, err := treeSitter.Parse(code)
-       if err != nil {
-           // Try partial parse
-           ast, warnings = treeSitter.ParseRecover(code)
-           return ast, warnings
-       }
-       return ast, nil
-   }
-   ```
-
-4. **Early Prototyping**
-   - Week 1: Verify Tree-sitter Go bindings
-   - Week 2: Build minimal parser for each language
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- 解析失败率统计
-- 按语言错误率追踪
-- 性能基准对比
-
----
-
-### 4.2 Database Migration Issues
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-TECH-002 |
-| **Title** | Database Schema Migration Failures |
-| **Category** | Technical |
-| **Severity** | Low |
-| **Probability** | Low |
-| **Impact** | Data loss, upgrade failures |
-
-**Description**:
-数据库迁移失败可能导致用户数据丢失或升级中断。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Versioned Migrations**
-   ```sql
-   -- migrations/001_initial.up.sql
-   CREATE TABLE scans (...);
-
-   -- migrations/001_initial.down.sql
-   DROP TABLE scans;
-   ```
-
-2. **Automated Testing**
-   ```go
-   func TestMigrations(t *testing.T) {
-       db := testDB()
-       MigrateUp(db)
-       // Verify schema
-       MigrateDown(db)
-       // Verify clean state
-   }
-   ```
-
-3. **Backup Before Migration**
-   ```go
-   func MigrateWithBackup(db *DB) error {
-       backupPath := backup(db)
-       defer func() {
-           if err != nil {
-               restore(db, backupPath)
-           }
-       }()
-       return migrate(db)
-   }
-   ```
-
-4. **SQLite Fallback**
-   - 轻量级部署可使用 SQLite
-   - 避免数据库安装问题
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- 迁移成功率监控
-- 回滚事件追踪
-- 用户报告的迁移问题
-
----
-
-## 5. Security Risks
-
-### 5.1 Code Privacy Leakage
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-SEC-001 |
-| **Title** | User Code Sent to External API |
-| **Category** | Security |
-| **Severity** | Critical |
-| **Probability** | Low |
-| **Impact** | Legal liability, user trust loss |
-
-**Description**:
-用户代码可能被意外发送到外部 LLM API，违反隐私承诺。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Opt-In AI by Default**
-   ```yaml
-   ai:
-     enabled: false  # Explicit opt-in required
-   ```
-
-2. **Clear Warnings**
-   ```bash
-   $ smc-review scan --ai
-   ⚠️  WARNING: AI mode will send code snippets to external API.
-   Confirm? (y/N):
-   ```
-
-3. **Code Sanitization**
-   ```go
-   func SanitizeForAI(code string) string {
-       // Remove literals that might be secrets
-       re := regexp.MustCompile(`['"][A-Za-z0-9/+]{32,}['"]`)
-       return re.ReplaceAllString(code, `"***REDACTED***"`)
-   }
-   ```
-
-4. **Audit Logging**
-   ```go
-   log.Info("AI request",
-       "scan_id", scanID,
-       "snippet_length", len(snippet),
-       "contains_secrets", containsSecrets(snippet),
-   )
-   ```
-
-5. **Local-Only Mode Guarantee**
-   ```bash
-   $ smc-review scan --local-only
-   ✅ Local mode confirmed: No external API calls will be made.
-   ```
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- AI 调用审计日志
-- 异常数据量告警
-- 定期隐私审计
-
----
-
-### 5.2 Supply Chain Attacks
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-SEC-002 |
-| **Title** | Malicious Dependency Injection |
-| **Category** | Security |
-| **Severity** | High |
-| **Probability** | Low |
-| **Impact** | User compromise, reputational damage |
-
-**Description**:
-恶意 Go 依赖可能被注入到项目中。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Go Modules Verification**
-   ```bash
-   go mod verify
-   go mod tidy -compat
-   ```
-
-2. **Dependabot Integration**
-   ```yaml
-   # .github/dependabot.yml
-   version: 2
-   dependencies:
-     - package-ecosystem: "gomod"
-       directory: "/"
-       schedule:
-         interval: "weekly"
-   ```
-
-3. **SBOM Generation**
-   ```bash
-   go install github.com/anchore/syft/cmd/syft@latest
-   syft . -o spdx-json > sbom.json
-   ```
-
-4. **Minimal Dependencies**
-   - 审查每个新依赖
-   - 优先使用标准库
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- 依赖更新通知
-- 安全漏洞扫描 (govulncheck)
-- 依赖审查流程
-
----
-
-## 6. Project Risks
-
-### 6.1 Timeline Overrun
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-PROJ-001 |
-| **Title** | Development Takes Longer Than Expected |
-| **Category** | Project Management |
-| **Severity** | Medium |
-| **Probability** | Medium |
-| **Impact** | Delayed launch, missed opportunity |
-
-**Description**:
-开发复杂度被低估，导致 16 周计划延期。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **MVP Prioritization**
-   ```
-   Must Have for v1.0:
-   - Python/JS parsing
-   - Core security rules
-   - CLI tool
-   - GitHub Action
-
-   Can Defer to v1.1:
-   - IDE plugins
-   - Advanced rules
-   - Local LLM optimization
-   ```
-
-2. **Weekly Checkpoints**
-   - 每周进度回顾
-   - 识别阻塞项
-   - 调整优先级
-
-3. **Buffer Time**
-   - WBS 中已包含 3.5 周缓冲
-   - 非关键路径可压缩
-
-4. **Parallel Work**
-   - 规则开发可与 CLI 并行
-   - 文档可与测试并行
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- 燃尽图 (Burndown chart)
-- 里程碑达成率
-- 关键路径进度
-
----
-
-### 6.2 Skill Gaps
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-PROJ-002 |
-| **Title** | Required Skills Not Available |
-| **Category** | Resource |
-| **Severity** | Medium |
-| **Probability** | Low |
-| **Impact** | Quality issues, delays |
-
-**Description**:
-团队可能缺少 Go、AST 或 LLM 集成经验。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Learning Phase**
-   - Week 0: 技术调研和原型
-   - 40 小时专门用于学习
-
-2. **Code Reuse**
-   - 参考开源项目 (SonarQube, golangci-lint)
-   - 使用成熟的库
-
-3. **External Help**
-   - Stack Overflow / GitHub Issues
-   - Gopher社区 Slack
-   - AI 辅助编程
-
-4. **Incremental Complexity**
-   ```
-   Start: Simple regex rules
-   Then: AST-based rules
-   Finally: Complex semantic analysis
-   ```
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- 阻塞问题追踪
-- 学习进度记录
-- 外部帮助频率
-
----
-
-## 7. Market Risks
-
-### 7.1 Competitor Response
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-MKT-001 |
-| **Title** | Existing Competitors Add Similar Features |
-| **Category** | Market |
-| **Severity** | Medium |
-| **Probability** | Medium |
-| **Impact** | Reduced differentiation |
-
-**Description**:
-SonarQube 或 GitHub Copilot 可能添加类似功能。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Focus on Niche**
-   - 本地部署优先
-   - AI + Rules 混合方法
-   - 开源透明
-
-2. **Fast Iteration**
-   - 快速响应用户反馈
-   - 社区驱动功能
-
-3. **Unique Features**
-   ```
-   Differentiators:
-   - Single binary, easy installation
-   - Works offline by default
-   - Transparent rule explanations
-   - Affordable for small teams
-   ```
-
-4. **Community Building**
-   - 开源核心功能
-   - 贡献者友好的架构
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- 竞品功能追踪
-- 用户反馈分析
-- 差异化价值验证
-
----
-
-### 7.2 Low Adoption
-
-| Attribute | Value |
-|-----------|-------|
-| **Risk ID** | R-MKT-002 |
-| **Title** | Users Don't Adopt the Tool |
-| **Category** | Market |
-| **Severity** | High |
-| **Probability** | Medium |
-| **Impact** | Project failure |
-
-**Description**:
-目标用户不愿意切换现有工具。
-
-**Mitigation Strategies**:
-
-1. **Smooth Onboarding**
-   ```bash
-   # One-line install
-   curl https://smc-review.sh/install | sh
-
-   # Auto-config detection
-   smc-review init --detect-project-type
-   ```
-
-2. **Integration First**
-   - GitHub Action 无需安装
-   - 与现有 CI/CD 兼容
-
-3. **Free & Open Source**
-   - MIT 许可证
-   - 核心功能永久免费
-
-4. **Early User Feedback**
-   - Alpha 测试计划
-   - Beta 用户访谈
-
-**Monitoring**:
-- 下载量追踪
-- 活跃用户指标
-- 留存率分析
-- NPS 调查
-
----
-
-## 8. Risk Register Summary
-
-| Risk ID | Title | Severity | Probability | Mitigation Status |
-|---------|-------|----------|-------------|-------------------|
-| R-LLM-001 | LLM API Downtime | High | Medium | Planned |
-| R-LLM-002 | Cost Overrun | High | Medium | Planned |
-| R-LLM-003 | Accuracy Issues | Medium | Medium | Planned |
-| R-PERF-001 | Large Scan Time | High | High | In Progress |
-| R-PERF-002 | Memory Exhaustion | Medium | Low | Planned |
-| R-QUAL-001 | False Positives | High | Medium | Planned |
-| R-QUAL-002 | Rule Gaps | Medium | Medium | Planned |
-| R-TECH-001 | Tree-sitter Issues | Medium | Medium | In Progress |
-| R-TECH-002 | Migration Failures | Low | Low | Planned |
-| R-SEC-001 | Privacy Leakage | Critical | Low | In Progress |
-| R-SEC-002 | Supply Chain | High | Low | Planned |
-| R-PROJ-001 | Timeline Overrun | Medium | Medium | Monitored |
-| R-PROJ-002 | Skill Gaps | Medium | Low | Addressed |
-| R-MKT-001 | Competitor Response | Medium | Medium | Monitored |
-| R-MKT-002 | Low Adoption | High | Medium | Planned |
-
----
-
-## 9. Risk Review Process
-
-### 9.1 Frequency
-
-| Review Type | Frequency | Participants |
-|-------------|-----------|--------------|
-| Daily Standup | Daily | Development team |
-| Risk Review | Weekly | Project lead |
-| Stakeholder Update | Bi-weekly | All stakeholders |
-| Full Assessment | Monthly | All stakeholders |
-
-### 9.2 Risk Triggers
-
-| Trigger | Action |
-|---------|--------|
-| New risk identified | Add to register, assess severity |
-| Risk status changes | Update register, notify stakeholders |
-| Mitigation completed | Mark resolved, document lessons |
-| Risk materialized | Incident response, post-mortem |
-
-### 9.3 Escalation Matrix
-
-| Severity | Immediate Action | Escalation Timeline |
-|----------|------------------|---------------------|
-| Critical | Stop the line | Immediate |
-| High | Daily review | 24 hours |
-| Medium | Weekly review | 1 week |
-| Low | Monthly review | Next review |
-
----
-
-## 10. Contingency Plans
-
-### 10.1 If LLM API Becomes Unreliable
-
-1. **Week 1-2**: Document local model setup guide
-2. **Week 3-4**: Prioritize rule engine accuracy
-3. **Week 5-6**: Release "Rules Only" mode as default
-
-### 10.2 If Timeline Slips Significantly
-
-1. **Cut P2 Features**: Move IDE plugin, advanced rules to v1.1
-2. **Reduce Scope**: Support only Python (delay JS/TS)
-3. **Extend Timeline**: Communicate 4-week delay to stakeholders
-
-### 10.3 If Adoption Is Lower Than Expected
-
-1. **Pivot**: Focus on enterprise/local deployment
-2. **Partnership**: Integrate with existing platforms
-3. **Community**: Launch open-source contribution campaign
-
----
-
-## Next Steps
-
-1. Review risk register with stakeholders
-2. Assign risk owners
-3. Set up monitoring and alerting
-4. Schedule first risk review meeting
-5. All Phase 3 documents complete - ready for Phase 4
-
----
-
-## Metadata
-
-- **Created**: 1/17/2026
-- **Author**: Phase 3 Design Executor
-- **Total Risks**: 15
-- **Critical Risks**: 1
-- **High Risks**: 7
-- **Medium Risks**: 6
-- **Low Risks**: 1
-- **Status**: Draft for Review
-- **Related Docs**: All Phase 3 documents
-
----
-
-*This risk assessment document provides a comprehensive view of potential threats to the AI Code Review Tool project and strategies to mitigate them.*