sumulige-claude 1.5.1 → 1.5.2

package/development/projects/proj_mkh4xwhj_gch8j/phase1/feasibility-report.md

@@ -1,160 +0,0 @@
-# Feasibility Analysis Report
-
-**Project**: proj_mkh4xwhj_gch8j
-**Date**: 1/17/2026 1:11:22 AM
-**Phase**: 1 - Research
-**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-> Brief overview of the project and feasibility assessment
-
----
-
-## Requirements Summary
-
-### Problem Statement
-[What problem are we solving?]
-
-### Target Users
-[Who will use this? What are their pain points?]
-
-### Key Features
-1. [Feature 1]
-2. [Feature 2]
-3. [Feature 3]
-
-### Constraints
-- [Constraint 1]
-- [Constraint 2]
-
-### Assumptions
-- [Assumption 1]
-- [Assumption 2]
-
----
-
-## Original Idea
-
-测试
-
-
-
----
-
-## Correlation Analysis (Connect The Dots)
-
-### Related Projects
-| Project | Similarity | Reusable Components |
-|---------|------------|---------------------|
-| [Project A] | 85% | [Component list] |
-| [Project B] | 60% | [Component list] |
-
-### Overlapping Technology
-- [Tech stack overlap]
-- [Shared libraries]
-- [Common patterns]
-
-### Lessons from History
-- [Lesson 1]: [Context and outcome]
-- [Lesson 2]: [Context and outcome]
-
----
-
-## Industry Best Practices
-
-### Architecture
-**Practice**: [Specific practice]
-**Rationale**: [Why this is recommended]
-**Sources**: [Citations]
-
-### Security
-**Practice**: [Security best practice]
-**Rationale**: [Why this matters]
-
----
-
-## Feasibility Assessment
-
-### Technical Feasibility: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
-
-**Strengths**:
-- [Strength 1]
-- [Strength 2]
-
-**Challenges**:
-- [Challenge 1]: [Mitigation strategy]
-
-### Time Estimate: X hours
-
-**Breakdown**:
-- Research & Planning: Xh
-- Design: Xh
-- Implementation: Xh
-- Testing: Xh
-
-**Total**: X hours
-
-### Complexity: Medium
-
-**Reasoning**: [Explain complexity assessment]
-
-### Risk Assessment
-
-| Risk | Severity | Probability | Mitigation |
-|------|----------|-------------|------------|
-| [Risk 1] | High | Medium | [Mitigation strategy] |
-| [Risk 2] | Medium | Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
-
----
-
-## Recommendations
-
-### Recommended Tech Stack
-
-**Frontend**:
-- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
-
-**Backend**:
-- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
-
-### Suggested Architecture
-
-[High-level architecture description]
-
-### Potential Issues to Watch
-
-1. **[Issue 1]**: [Monitoring approach]
-2. **[Issue 2]**: [Monitoring approach]
-
-### Next Steps (Phase 2: Approval)
-
-1. [ ] Review this report and ensure all sections are complete
-2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh4xwhj_gch8j/phase1/feasibility-report.md`
-3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
-4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 2 for Claude review and consensus
-
----
-
-## Quality Checklist
-
-- [x] Requirement summary is clear and complete
-- [ ] Correlation analysis found related work/patterns
-- [ ] Best practices are cited with sources
-- [ ] Feasibility has concrete ratings (not vague)
-- [ ] Time estimate is justified
-- [ ] Risks have mitigation strategies
-- [ ] Recommendations are actionable
-
----
-
-## Metadata
-
-- **Generated**: 1/17/2026 1:11:22 AM
-- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
-
----
-
-*This report was generated by the Phase 1 Research Executor.*

package/development/projects/proj_mkh4y2qk_9lm8z/phase1/feasibility-report.md

@@ -1,160 +0,0 @@
-# Feasibility Analysis Report
-
-**Project**: proj_mkh4y2qk_9lm8z
-**Date**: 1/17/2026 1:11:30 AM
-**Phase**: 1 - Research
-**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-> Brief overview of the project and feasibility assessment
-
----
-
-## Requirements Summary
-
-### Problem Statement
-[What problem are we solving?]
-
-### Target Users
-[Who will use this? What are their pain points?]
-
-### Key Features
-1. [Feature 1]
-2. [Feature 2]
-3. [Feature 3]
-
-### Constraints
-- [Constraint 1]
-- [Constraint 2]
-
-### Assumptions
-- [Assumption 1]
-- [Assumption 2]
-
----
-
-## Original Idea
-
-构建一个简单的个人博客系统，支持Markdown文章发布
-
-
-
----
-
-## Correlation Analysis (Connect The Dots)
-
-### Related Projects
-| Project | Similarity | Reusable Components |
-|---------|------------|---------------------|
-| [Project A] | 85% | [Component list] |
-| [Project B] | 60% | [Component list] |
-
-### Overlapping Technology
-- [Tech stack overlap]
-- [Shared libraries]
-- [Common patterns]
-
-### Lessons from History
-- [Lesson 1]: [Context and outcome]
-- [Lesson 2]: [Context and outcome]
-
----
-
-## Industry Best Practices
-
-### Architecture
-**Practice**: [Specific practice]
-**Rationale**: [Why this is recommended]
-**Sources**: [Citations]
-
-### Security
-**Practice**: [Security best practice]
-**Rationale**: [Why this matters]
-
----
-
-## Feasibility Assessment
-
-### Technical Feasibility: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
-
-**Strengths**:
-- [Strength 1]
-- [Strength 2]
-
-**Challenges**:
-- [Challenge 1]: [Mitigation strategy]
-
-### Time Estimate: X hours
-
-**Breakdown**:
-- Research & Planning: Xh
-- Design: Xh
-- Implementation: Xh
-- Testing: Xh
-
-**Total**: X hours
-
-### Complexity: Medium
-
-**Reasoning**: [Explain complexity assessment]
-
-### Risk Assessment
-
-| Risk | Severity | Probability | Mitigation |
-|------|----------|-------------|------------|
-| [Risk 1] | High | Medium | [Mitigation strategy] |
-| [Risk 2] | Medium | Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
-
----
-
-## Recommendations
-
-### Recommended Tech Stack
-
-**Frontend**:
-- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
-
-**Backend**:
-- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
-
-### Suggested Architecture
-
-[High-level architecture description]
-
-### Potential Issues to Watch
-
-1. **[Issue 1]**: [Monitoring approach]
-2. **[Issue 2]**: [Monitoring approach]
-
-### Next Steps (Phase 2: Approval)
-
-1. [ ] Review this report and ensure all sections are complete
-2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh4y2qk_9lm8z/phase1/feasibility-report.md`
-3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
-4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 2 for Claude review and consensus
-
----
-
-## Quality Checklist
-
-- [x] Requirement summary is clear and complete
-- [ ] Correlation analysis found related work/patterns
-- [ ] Best practices are cited with sources
-- [ ] Feasibility has concrete ratings (not vague)
-- [ ] Time estimate is justified
-- [ ] Risks have mitigation strategies
-- [ ] Recommendations are actionable
-
----
-
-## Metadata
-
-- **Generated**: 1/17/2026 1:11:30 AM
-- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
-
----
-
-*This report was generated by the Phase 1 Research Executor.*

package/development/projects/proj_mkh4y2qk_9lm8z/phase2/requirements.md

@@ -1,226 +0,0 @@
-# Requirements Document
-
-**Project**: proj_mkh4y2qk_9lm8z
-**Date**: 1/17/2026 1:34:30 AM
-**Phase**: 2 - Approval
-**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-> Brief overview of the approved requirements
-
-**Based on**: Phase 1 Feasibility Report (`../phase1/feasibility-report.md`)
-
----
-
-## Phase 1 Summary
-
-### Original Idea
-构建一个简单的个人博客系统，支持Markdown文章发布
-
-
-
----
-
-### Feasibility Assessment
-[From Phase 1 Report]
-
----
-
-## Clarification Questions & Responses
-
-## Clarification Questions
-
-> Based on the feasibility analysis, the following questions need clarification:
-
-### Scope & Priorities
-1. **MVP Scope**: What is the minimum viable scope for the first iteration?
-   - [ ] Define core features that must be in v1.0
-   - [ ] Identify features that can be deferred to later versions
-
-2. **Priority Order**: Which features are highest priority?
-   - [ ] Rank features by business value
-   - [ ] Identify any dependencies between features
-
-### Technical Decisions
-3. **Tech Stack Confirmation**: Confirm the recommended technology choices
-   - [ ] Frontend: See Phase 1
-   - [ ] Backend: See Phase 1
-   - [ ] Any constraints or preferences?
-
-4. **Integration Points**: Are there existing systems to integrate with?
-   - [ ] APIs to connect to
-   - [ ] Data migration needs
-   - [ ] Third-party service dependencies
-
-### Success Definition
-5. **Success Criteria**: How will we know this project is successful?
-   - [ ] Define measurable outcomes
-   - [ ] Set success metrics for post-launch
-
-### Constraints
-6. **Timeline Constraints**: Any deadline requirements?
-   - [ ] Hard deadlines (e.g., launch date)
-   - [ ] Time constraints for specific phases
-
-7. **Resource Constraints**: Any limitations on resources?
-   - [ ] Budget constraints
-   - [ ] Team size/skills availability
-   - [ ] Infrastructure limitations
-
----
-*Add user responses below each question. Once consensus is reached, proceed to requirements definition.*
-
-
----
-
-## Functional Requirements
-
-### FR-001: [Requirement Title]
-
-**Description**: [Clear, unambiguous description of what the system should do]
-
-**Priority**: Must Have / Should Have / Could Have / Won't Have
-
-**Acceptance Criteria**:
-- [ ] Given [context], when [action], then [outcome]
-- [ ] Given [context], when [action], then [outcome]
-- [ ] Given [context], when [action], then [outcome]
-
-**Dependencies**: [Other requirements or systems this depends on]
-
----
-
-### FR-002: [Requirement Title]
-
-**Description**: [Clear, unambiguous description]
-
-**Priority**: Must Have / Should Have / Could Have / Won't Have
-
-**Acceptance Criteria**:
-- [ ] Given [context], when [action], then [outcome]
-- [ ] Given [context], when [action], then [outcome]
-
-**Dependencies**: [List dependencies]
-
----
-
-## Non-Functional Requirements
-
-### Performance
-- **Response Time**: [e.g., API requests < 200ms p95]
-- **Throughput**: [e.g., 1000 concurrent users]
-- **Resource Limits**: [e.g., Memory < 512MB]
-
-### Security
-- **Authentication**: [e.g., JWT tokens, OAuth 2.0]
-- **Authorization**: [e.g., Role-based access control]
-- **Data Protection**: [e.g., Encryption at rest and in transit]
-
-### Reliability
-- **Uptime Target**: [e.g., 99.9% availability]
-- **Failure Handling**: [Graceful degradation strategy]
-
-### Maintainability
-- **Code Quality**: [e.g., Test coverage > 80%]
-- **Documentation**: [API documentation, code comments]
-
-### Compatibility
-- **Browsers**: [Supported browser versions]
-- **Platforms**: [Supported operating systems]
-- **API Versions**: [Versioning strategy]
-
----
-
-## Success Metrics
-
-### User Engagement
-| Metric | Target | Measurement Method |
-|--------|--------|-------------------|
-| [e.g., Daily Active Users] | [value] | [analytics tool] |
-| [e.g., Session Duration] | [value] | [analytics tool] |
-
-### Technical Performance
-| Metric | Target | Measurement Method |
-|--------|--------|-------------------|
-| [e.g., Page Load Time] | [value] | [monitoring tool] |
-| [e.g., Error Rate] | [value] | [monitoring tool] |
-
-### Business Outcomes
-| Metric | Target | Measurement Method |
-|--------|--------|-------------------|
-| [e.g., Conversion Rate] | [value] | [analytics tool] |
-| [e.g., Customer Satisfaction] | [value] | [survey] |
-
----
-
-## Edge Cases & Constraints
-
-### Edge Cases
-- [Edge Case 1]: [Handling strategy]
-- [Edge Case 2]: [Handling strategy]
-- [Edge Case 3]: [Handling strategy]
-
-### Constraints
-- **Technical**: [Technical limitations]
-- **Business**: [Business rules or constraints]
-- **Legal**: [Compliance requirements]
-- **Timeline**: [Deadline constraints]
-
----
-
-## Assumptions & Dependencies
-
-### Assumptions
-- [Assumption 1]: [Impact if false]
-- [Assumption 2]: [Impact if false]
-
-### Dependencies
-- **Internal**: [Internal system dependencies]
-- **External**: [Third-party services or APIs]
-- **Team**: [Required team roles or skills]
-
----
-
-## Out of Scope
-
-Explicitly list what is NOT included in this phase:
-
-- [Out of Scope Item 1]: [Reason for exclusion]
-- [Out of Scope Item 2]: [Reason for exclusion]
-- [Out of Scope Item 3]: [Reason for exclusion]
-
----
-
-## Approval Checklist
-
-- [x] Requirements are clear and unambiguous
-- [ ] Acceptance criteria are testable
-- [ ] Technical rationale is documented
-- [ ] Success metrics are quantifiable
-- [ ] Edge cases are identified
-- [ ] Constraints are documented
-- [ ] Stakeholder consensus achieved
-
----
-
-## Next Steps (Phase 3: Planning)
-
-1. [ ] Review requirements with all stakeholders
-2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh4y2qk_9lm8z/phase2/requirements.md`
-3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
-4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 3 for detailed design and planning
-
----
-
-## Metadata
-
-- **Generated**: 1/17/2026 1:34:30 AM
-- **Phase 1 Report**: `../phase1/feasibility-report.md`
-- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
-
----
-
-*This document was generated by the Phase 2 Approval Executor.*