sumulige-claude 1.1.2 → 1.2.0

package/development/projects/proj_mkh8zddd_dhamf/phase3/risks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,957 @@
+# Risk Assessment and Mitigation
+
+**Project**: proj_mkh8zddd_dhamf (AI 代码审查工具)
+**Date**: 1/17/2026
+**Phase**: 3 - Planning
+**Status**: In Progress
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+本文档识别 AI 代码审查工具项目的主要风险，并提供缓解策略。
+
+**风险等级定义**:
+- **Critical**: 可能导致项目失败
+- **High**: 显著影响项目进度或质量
+- **Medium**: 中等影响，需要监控
+- **Low**: 轻微影响，可接受
+
+**总体风险评级**: Medium (可控，需要积极管理)
+
+---
+
+## 1. LLM API Risks
+
+### 1.1 API Service Unavailability
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-LLM-001 |
+| **Title** | LLM API Service Downtime |
+| **Category** | External Dependency |
+| **Severity** | High |
+| **Probability** | Medium |
+| **Impact** | AI-enhanced analysis unavailable |
+
+**Description**:
+Claude API 或其他 LLM 服务可能出现中断、速率限制或服务降级，导致 AI 分析功能不可用。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Graceful Degradation**
+   ```go
+   func (s *Scanner) ScanWithAI(file string) Issues {
+       issues, err := s.llm.Analyze(file)
+       if err != nil {
+           log.Warn("LLM unavailable, using rules only")
+           return s.scanWithRules(file)  // Fallback to rules
+       }
+       return issues
+   }
+   ```
+
+2. **Local Model Fallback**
+   - 集成 Ollama 或本地 Llama 模型
+   - 用户可配置首选模式 (API vs Local)
+
+3. **Retry Logic**
+   ```go
+   retryConfig := retry.Config{
+       MaxRetries: 3,
+       Backoff:    exponentialBackoff,
+       MaxDelay:   30 * time.Second,
+   }
+   ```
+
+4. **Circuit Breaker**
+   - 连续失败后暂停 API 调用
+   - 自动恢复检测
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- API 可用性监控 (uptime robot)
+- P95/P99 响应时间告警
+- 失败率阈值告警 (>5%)
+
+---
+
+### 1.2 LLM Cost Overrun
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-LLM-002 |
+| **Title** | Unexpected API Cost Increases |
+| **Category** | Financial |
+| **Severity** | High |
+| **Probability** | Medium |
+| **Impact** | Budget overrun, user dissatisfaction |
+
+**Description**:
+LLM API 调用成本可能超出预期，特别是在处理大型代码库时。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Cost Control Configuration**
+   ```yaml
+   ai:
+     cost_control:
+       max_requests_per_scan: 10
+       max_tokens_per_scan: 10000
+       monthly_budget_usd: 50.0
+       warn_at_percent: 80
+   ```
+
+2. **Smart Sampling**
+   - 只对最复杂的代码使用 LLM
+   - 优先分析新变更的文件 (diff mode)
+
+3. **Token Estimation**
+   ```go
+   func EstimateTokens(code string) int {
+       return len(code) / 4  // Rough estimate: 4 chars per token
+   }
+
+   func CheckBudget(scan *Scan) error {
+       estimated := EstimateTokens(scan.Code) * CostPerToken
+       if estimated > remainingBudget {
+           return errors.New("exceeds budget")
+       }
+       return nil
+   }
+   ```
+
+4. **Local-First Architecture**
+   - 默认使用规则引擎 (无成本)
+   - AI 作为可选增强功能
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- 每日 API 成本报告
+- 按用户/项目成本追踪
+- 月度预算告警
+
+---
+
+### 1.3 LLM Accuracy Issues
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-LLM-003 |
+| **Title** | False Positives/Negatives from AI |
+| **Category** | Quality |
+| **Severity** | Medium |
+| **Probability** | Medium |
+| **Impact** | User trust erosion |
+
+**Description**:
+LLM 可能产生不准确的分析结果，导致误报或漏报。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Dual-Validation System**
+   ```
+   Rule Engine (High Precision)
+         ↓
+   Filter Results
+         ↓
+   LLM Enhancement (Recall Boost)
+         ↓
+   Human Review (Final)
+   ```
+
+2. **Confidence Scoring**
+   ```go
+   type Issue struct {
+       Confidence float64  // 0.0 to 1.0
+       Source     string   // "rule" or "llm"
+   }
+
+   func (i *Issue) IsReliable() bool {
+       return i.Confidence > 0.7 || i.Source == "rule"
+   }
+   ```
+
+3. **Feedback Loop**
+   - 用户可标记"不有用"的建议
+   - 反馈数据用于改进 Prompt
+   - A/B 测试不同 Prompt 版本
+
+4. **Transparent Attribution**
+   ```
+   [AI-Generated] SQL Injection Risk (Confidence: 0.65)
+   This suggestion was generated by AI and should be verified.
+   ```
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- 用户"不有用"点击率
+- 误报率抽样检查
+- 准确率趋势分析
+
+---
+
+## 2. Performance Risks
+
+### 2.1 Large Repository Scan Time
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-PERF-001 |
+| **Title** | Scanning Large Repositories Takes Too Long |
+| **Category** | Performance |
+| **Severity** | High |
+| **Probability** | High |
+| **Impact** | Poor user experience, CI/CD blocking |
+
+**Description**:
+大型代码库 (100万+ 行) 扫描时间可能超过 5 分钟目标，影响 CI/CD 流水线。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Incremental Scanning**
+   ```go
+   func (s *Scanner) GetChangedFiles(base, head string) ([]string, error) {
+       // Git diff to get only changed files
+       return git.Diff(base, head, "--name-only")
+   }
+   ```
+
+2. **Parallel Processing**
+   ```go
+   func (s *Scanner) ScanParallel(files []string) Issues {
+       var wg sync.WaitGroup
+       results := make(chan Issues, len(files))
+
+       workers := runtime.NumCPU()
+       for i := 0; i < workers; i++ {
+           wg.Add(1)
+           go func() {
+               defer wg.Done()
+               for file := range filesCh {
+                   results <- s.ScanFile(file)
+               }
+           }()
+       }
+       // ...
+   }
+   ```
+
+3. **Intelligent Caching**
+   ```
+   Cache Key: hash(file_path + file_content + rule_version)
+   TTL: 24 hours or until file changes
+   ```
+
+4. **Progressive Output**
+   ```bash
+   $ smc-review scan ./src
+   Scanning... [████████░░░░] 80% (452/567 files)
+   Found 12 issues so far...
+   ```
+
+5. **Scan Targets**
+   - 默认: Git diff only (CI mode)
+   - 可选: Full scan (manual mode)
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- 按代码库大小扫描时间基准
+- P95 扫描时间告警
+- 缓存命中率追踪
+
+---
+
+### 2.2 Memory Exhaustion
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-PERF-002 |
+| **Title** | High Memory Usage During Scans |
+| **Category** | Performance |
+| **Severity** | Medium |
+| **Probability** | Low |
+| **Impact** | Process crashes, system slowdown |
+
+**Description**:
+解析大型文件或并发扫描可能导致内存溢出。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Streaming Parsing**
+   ```go
+   func ParseFileStream(path string) (<-chan *ASTNode, error) {
+       // Emit AST nodes as they're parsed
+       // instead of loading entire tree into memory
+   }
+   ```
+
+2. **File Size Limits**
+   ```yaml
+   scan:
+     max_file_size_mb: 1.0
+     skip_large_files: true
+   ```
+
+3. **Memory Monitoring**
+   ```go
+   func CheckMemoryLimit() {
+       var m runtime.MemStats
+       runtime.ReadMemStats(&m)
+       if m.Alloc > maxMemory {
+           log.Warn("Memory limit reached, flushing cache")
+           cache.Flush()
+       }
+   }
+   ```
+
+4. **Worker Pool Limits**
+   ```go
+   const maxWorkers = 4
+   semaphore := make(chan struct{}, maxWorkers)
+   ```
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- 峰值内存使用追踪
+- OOM 崩溃监控
+- 内存泄漏检测
+
+---
+
+## 3. Quality Risks
+
+### 3.1 High False Positive Rate
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-QUAL-001 |
+| **Title** | Too Many False Positives |
+| **Category** | Quality |
+| **Severity** | High |
+| **Probability** | Medium |
+| **Impact** | User abandonment, tool ignored |
+
+**Description**:
+过多误报会导致用户忽略所有警告，使工具失去价值。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Strict Rule Defaults**
+   ```yaml
+   rules:
+     security:
+       enabled: true
+       severity: high  # Only report high+
+     quality:
+       enabled: true
+       severity: medium  # Only report medium+
+   ```
+
+2. **Smart Filtering**
+   ```go
+   func ShouldReport(issue Issue) bool {
+       // Ignore in test files
+       if isTestFile(issue.File) && issue.Severity < High {
+           return false
+       }
+       // Ignore in generated code
+       if isGenerated(issue.File) {
+           return false
+       }
+       return true
+   }
+   ```
+
+3. **User Feedback Integration**
+   ```yaml
+   ignore:
+     issues:
+       - id: long-function
+         files: ["**/test_*.py"]
+         reason: "Tests can be longer"
+   ```
+
+4. **Accuracy Metrics**
+   - 定期人工抽样验证
+   - 准确率目标: >85%
+   - 误报率目标: <15%
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- 每周准确率报告
+- 用户反馈分析
+- 规则效果排行
+
+---
+
+### 3.2 Rule Coverage Gaps
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-QUAL-002 |
+| **Title** | Missing Important Rules |
+| **Category** | Quality |
+| **Severity** | Medium |
+| **Probability** | Medium |
+| **Impact** | Limited value, missed vulnerabilities |
+
+**Description**:
+v1.0 可能缺少关键安全规则，导致漏报重要漏洞。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Competitive Analysis**
+   - 对照 SonarQube, ESLint, Pylint 规则集
+   - 识别高优先级缺失规则
+
+2. **OWASP Top 10 Coverage**
+   ```go
+   var owaspRules = []Rule{
+       SQLInjection{},
+       XSS{},
+       CSRFProtection{},
+       InsecureDeserialization{},
+       SecurityHeaders{},
+       // ...
+   }
+   ```
+
+3. **Community Contributions**
+   - 开放规则提交流程
+   - 自定义规则 DSL
+
+4. **Phased Rollout**
+   ```
+   v1.0: Core security (SQLi, XSS)
+   v1.1: OWASP Top 10 complete
+   v1.2: Advanced security patterns
+   ```
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- 规则覆盖率追踪
+- 用户请求的新规则
+- 漏报报告分析
+
+---
+
+## 4. Technical Risks
+
+### 4.1 Tree-sitter Integration Complexity
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-TECH-001 |
+| **Title** | Tree-sitter Go Binding Issues |
+| **Category** | Technical |
+| **Severity** | Medium |
+| **Probability** | Medium |
+| **Impact** | Delayed parsing, buggy AST |
+
+**Description**:
+Tree-sitter Go 绑定可能不成熟或有 bug，影响解析稳定性。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Alternative Parsers**
+   ```go
+   type Parser interface {
+       Parse(path string) (*AST, error)
+   }
+
+   type TreeSitterParser struct{}
+   type FallbackParser struct{}  // Regex/heuristic fallback
+   ```
+
+2. **Language-Specific Handling**
+   ```go
+   func ParseFile(path string) (*AST, error) {
+       lang := DetectLanguage(path)
+       switch lang {
+       case Python:
+           return parsePython(path)
+       case JavaScript:
+           return parseJavaScript(path)
+       default:
+           return nil, ErrUnsupported
+       }
+   }
+   ```
+
+3. **Error Recovery**
+   ```go
+   func ParseWithRecovery(code string) (*AST, []error) {
+       ast, err := treeSitter.Parse(code)
+       if err != nil {
+           // Try partial parse
+           ast, warnings = treeSitter.ParseRecover(code)
+           return ast, warnings
+       }
+       return ast, nil
+   }
+   ```
+
+4. **Early Prototyping**
+   - Week 1: Verify Tree-sitter Go bindings
+   - Week 2: Build minimal parser for each language
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- 解析失败率统计
+- 按语言错误率追踪
+- 性能基准对比
+
+---
+
+### 4.2 Database Migration Issues
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-TECH-002 |
+| **Title** | Database Schema Migration Failures |
+| **Category** | Technical |
+| **Severity** | Low |
+| **Probability** | Low |
+| **Impact** | Data loss, upgrade failures |
+
+**Description**:
+数据库迁移失败可能导致用户数据丢失或升级中断。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Versioned Migrations**
+   ```sql
+   -- migrations/001_initial.up.sql
+   CREATE TABLE scans (...);
+
+   -- migrations/001_initial.down.sql
+   DROP TABLE scans;
+   ```
+
+2. **Automated Testing**
+   ```go
+   func TestMigrations(t *testing.T) {
+       db := testDB()
+       MigrateUp(db)
+       // Verify schema
+       MigrateDown(db)
+       // Verify clean state
+   }
+   ```
+
+3. **Backup Before Migration**
+   ```go
+   func MigrateWithBackup(db *DB) error {
+       backupPath := backup(db)
+       defer func() {
+           if err != nil {
+               restore(db, backupPath)
+           }
+       }()
+       return migrate(db)
+   }
+   ```
+
+4. **SQLite Fallback**
+   - 轻量级部署可使用 SQLite
+   - 避免数据库安装问题
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- 迁移成功率监控
+- 回滚事件追踪
+- 用户报告的迁移问题
+
+---
+
+## 5. Security Risks
+
+### 5.1 Code Privacy Leakage
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-SEC-001 |
+| **Title** | User Code Sent to External API |
+| **Category** | Security |
+| **Severity** | Critical |
+| **Probability** | Low |
+| **Impact** | Legal liability, user trust loss |
+
+**Description**:
+用户代码可能被意外发送到外部 LLM API，违反隐私承诺。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Opt-In AI by Default**
+   ```yaml
+   ai:
+     enabled: false  # Explicit opt-in required
+   ```
+
+2. **Clear Warnings**
+   ```bash
+   $ smc-review scan --ai
+   ⚠️  WARNING: AI mode will send code snippets to external API.
+   Confirm? (y/N):
+   ```
+
+3. **Code Sanitization**
+   ```go
+   func SanitizeForAI(code string) string {
+       // Remove literals that might be secrets
+       re := regexp.MustCompile(`['"][A-Za-z0-9/+]{32,}['"]`)
+       return re.ReplaceAllString(code, `"***REDACTED***"`)
+   }
+   ```
+
+4. **Audit Logging**
+   ```go
+   log.Info("AI request",
+       "scan_id", scanID,
+       "snippet_length", len(snippet),
+       "contains_secrets", containsSecrets(snippet),
+   )
+   ```
+
+5. **Local-Only Mode Guarantee**
+   ```bash
+   $ smc-review scan --local-only
+   ✅ Local mode confirmed: No external API calls will be made.
+   ```
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- AI 调用审计日志
+- 异常数据量告警
+- 定期隐私审计
+
+---
+
+### 5.2 Supply Chain Attacks
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-SEC-002 |
+| **Title** | Malicious Dependency Injection |
+| **Category** | Security |
+| **Severity** | High |
+| **Probability** | Low |
+| **Impact** | User compromise, reputational damage |
+
+**Description**:
+恶意 Go 依赖可能被注入到项目中。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Go Modules Verification**
+   ```bash
+   go mod verify
+   go mod tidy -compat
+   ```
+
+2. **Dependabot Integration**
+   ```yaml
+   # .github/dependabot.yml
+   version: 2
+   dependencies:
+     - package-ecosystem: "gomod"
+       directory: "/"
+       schedule:
+         interval: "weekly"
+   ```
+
+3. **SBOM Generation**
+   ```bash
+   go install github.com/anchore/syft/cmd/syft@latest
+   syft . -o spdx-json > sbom.json
+   ```
+
+4. **Minimal Dependencies**
+   - 审查每个新依赖
+   - 优先使用标准库
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- 依赖更新通知
+- 安全漏洞扫描 (govulncheck)
+- 依赖审查流程
+
+---
+
+## 6. Project Risks
+
+### 6.1 Timeline Overrun
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-PROJ-001 |
+| **Title** | Development Takes Longer Than Expected |
+| **Category** | Project Management |
+| **Severity** | Medium |
+| **Probability** | Medium |
+| **Impact** | Delayed launch, missed opportunity |
+
+**Description**:
+开发复杂度被低估，导致 16 周计划延期。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **MVP Prioritization**
+   ```
+   Must Have for v1.0:
+   - Python/JS parsing
+   - Core security rules
+   - CLI tool
+   - GitHub Action
+
+   Can Defer to v1.1:
+   - IDE plugins
+   - Advanced rules
+   - Local LLM optimization
+   ```
+
+2. **Weekly Checkpoints**
+   - 每周进度回顾
+   - 识别阻塞项
+   - 调整优先级
+
+3. **Buffer Time**
+   - WBS 中已包含 3.5 周缓冲
+   - 非关键路径可压缩
+
+4. **Parallel Work**
+   - 规则开发可与 CLI 并行
+   - 文档可与测试并行
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- 燃尽图 (Burndown chart)
+- 里程碑达成率
+- 关键路径进度
+
+---
+
+### 6.2 Skill Gaps
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-PROJ-002 |
+| **Title** | Required Skills Not Available |
+| **Category** | Resource |
+| **Severity** | Medium |
+| **Probability** | Low |
+| **Impact** | Quality issues, delays |
+
+**Description**:
+团队可能缺少 Go、AST 或 LLM 集成经验。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Learning Phase**
+   - Week 0: 技术调研和原型
+   - 40 小时专门用于学习
+
+2. **Code Reuse**
+   - 参考开源项目 (SonarQube, golangci-lint)
+   - 使用成熟的库
+
+3. **External Help**
+   - Stack Overflow / GitHub Issues
+   - Gopher社区 Slack
+   - AI 辅助编程
+
+4. **Incremental Complexity**
+   ```
+   Start: Simple regex rules
+   Then: AST-based rules
+   Finally: Complex semantic analysis
+   ```
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- 阻塞问题追踪
+- 学习进度记录
+- 外部帮助频率
+
+---
+
+## 7. Market Risks
+
+### 7.1 Competitor Response
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-MKT-001 |
+| **Title** | Existing Competitors Add Similar Features |
+| **Category** | Market |
+| **Severity** | Medium |
+| **Probability** | Medium |
+| **Impact** | Reduced differentiation |
+
+**Description**:
+SonarQube 或 GitHub Copilot 可能添加类似功能。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Focus on Niche**
+   - 本地部署优先
+   - AI + Rules 混合方法
+   - 开源透明
+
+2. **Fast Iteration**
+   - 快速响应用户反馈
+   - 社区驱动功能
+
+3. **Unique Features**
+   ```
+   Differentiators:
+   - Single binary, easy installation
+   - Works offline by default
+   - Transparent rule explanations
+   - Affordable for small teams
+   ```
+
+4. **Community Building**
+   - 开源核心功能
+   - 贡献者友好的架构
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- 竞品功能追踪
+- 用户反馈分析
+- 差异化价值验证
+
+---
+
+### 7.2 Low Adoption
+
+| Attribute | Value |
+|-----------|-------|
+| **Risk ID** | R-MKT-002 |
+| **Title** | Users Don't Adopt the Tool |
+| **Category** | Market |
+| **Severity** | High |
+| **Probability** | Medium |
+| **Impact** | Project failure |
+
+**Description**:
+目标用户不愿意切换现有工具。
+
+**Mitigation Strategies**:
+
+1. **Smooth Onboarding**
+   ```bash
+   # One-line install
+   curl https://smc-review.sh/install | sh
+
+   # Auto-config detection
+   smc-review init --detect-project-type
+   ```
+
+2. **Integration First**
+   - GitHub Action 无需安装
+   - 与现有 CI/CD 兼容
+
+3. **Free & Open Source**
+   - MIT 许可证
+   - 核心功能永久免费
+
+4. **Early User Feedback**
+   - Alpha 测试计划
+   - Beta 用户访谈
+
+**Monitoring**:
+- 下载量追踪
+- 活跃用户指标
+- 留存率分析
+- NPS 调查
+
+---
+
+## 8. Risk Register Summary
+
+| Risk ID | Title | Severity | Probability | Mitigation Status |
+|---------|-------|----------|-------------|-------------------|
+| R-LLM-001 | LLM API Downtime | High | Medium | Planned |
+| R-LLM-002 | Cost Overrun | High | Medium | Planned |
+| R-LLM-003 | Accuracy Issues | Medium | Medium | Planned |
+| R-PERF-001 | Large Scan Time | High | High | In Progress |
+| R-PERF-002 | Memory Exhaustion | Medium | Low | Planned |
+| R-QUAL-001 | False Positives | High | Medium | Planned |
+| R-QUAL-002 | Rule Gaps | Medium | Medium | Planned |
+| R-TECH-001 | Tree-sitter Issues | Medium | Medium | In Progress |
+| R-TECH-002 | Migration Failures | Low | Low | Planned |
+| R-SEC-001 | Privacy Leakage | Critical | Low | In Progress |
+| R-SEC-002 | Supply Chain | High | Low | Planned |
+| R-PROJ-001 | Timeline Overrun | Medium | Medium | Monitored |
+| R-PROJ-002 | Skill Gaps | Medium | Low | Addressed |
+| R-MKT-001 | Competitor Response | Medium | Medium | Monitored |
+| R-MKT-002 | Low Adoption | High | Medium | Planned |
+
+---
+
+## 9. Risk Review Process
+
+### 9.1 Frequency
+
+| Review Type | Frequency | Participants |
+|-------------|-----------|--------------|
+| Daily Standup | Daily | Development team |
+| Risk Review | Weekly | Project lead |
+| Stakeholder Update | Bi-weekly | All stakeholders |
+| Full Assessment | Monthly | All stakeholders |
+
+### 9.2 Risk Triggers
+
+| Trigger | Action |
+|---------|--------|
+| New risk identified | Add to register, assess severity |
+| Risk status changes | Update register, notify stakeholders |
+| Mitigation completed | Mark resolved, document lessons |
+| Risk materialized | Incident response, post-mortem |
+
+### 9.3 Escalation Matrix
+
+| Severity | Immediate Action | Escalation Timeline |
+|----------|------------------|---------------------|
+| Critical | Stop the line | Immediate |
+| High | Daily review | 24 hours |
+| Medium | Weekly review | 1 week |
+| Low | Monthly review | Next review |
+
+---
+
+## 10. Contingency Plans
+
+### 10.1 If LLM API Becomes Unreliable
+
+1. **Week 1-2**: Document local model setup guide
+2. **Week 3-4**: Prioritize rule engine accuracy
+3. **Week 5-6**: Release "Rules Only" mode as default
+
+### 10.2 If Timeline Slips Significantly
+
+1. **Cut P2 Features**: Move IDE plugin, advanced rules to v1.1
+2. **Reduce Scope**: Support only Python (delay JS/TS)
+3. **Extend Timeline**: Communicate 4-week delay to stakeholders
+
+### 10.3 If Adoption Is Lower Than Expected
+
+1. **Pivot**: Focus on enterprise/local deployment
+2. **Partnership**: Integrate with existing platforms
+3. **Community**: Launch open-source contribution campaign
+
+---
+
+## Next Steps
+
+1. Review risk register with stakeholders
+2. Assign risk owners
+3. Set up monitoring and alerting
+4. Schedule first risk review meeting
+5. All Phase 3 documents complete - ready for Phase 4
+
+---
+
+## Metadata
+
+- **Created**: 1/17/2026
+- **Author**: Phase 3 Design Executor
+- **Total Risks**: 15
+- **Critical Risks**: 1
+- **High Risks**: 7
+- **Medium Risks**: 6
+- **Low Risks**: 1
+- **Status**: Draft for Review
+- **Related Docs**: All Phase 3 documents
+
+---
+
+*This risk assessment document provides a comprehensive view of potential threats to the AI Code Review Tool project and strategies to mitigate them.*