sumulige-claude 1.1.2 → 1.2.0

package/development/knowledge-base/test-best-practices.md

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# Best Practices for API Design
+
+## Introduction
+This document covers API design best practices for building scalable web services.
+
+## Core Principles
+
+1. **Consistency**: Use consistent naming conventions
+2. **Versioning**: Always version your APIs
+3. **Error Handling**: Return meaningful error messages
+
+## RESTful Guidelines
+
+- Use HTTP verbs correctly (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE)
+- Design resource-oriented URLs
+- Implement proper status codes
+
+## Authentication
+
+Consider using JWT tokens for stateless authentication.
+
+
+
+## Security Best Practices
+
+- Always use HTTPS
+- Implement rate limiting
+- Validate input data
+

package/development/projects/proj_mkh1pazz_ixmt1/phase1/feasibility-report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+# Feasibility Analysis Report
+
+**Project**: proj_mkh1pazz_ixmt1
+**Date**: 1/16/2026 11:40:42 PM
+**Phase**: 1 - Research
+**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+> Brief overview of the project and feasibility assessment
+
+---
+
+## Requirements Summary
+
+### Problem Statement
+[What problem are we solving?]
+
+### Target Users
+[Who will use this? What are their pain points?]
+
+### Key Features
+1. [Feature 1]
+2. [Feature 2]
+3. [Feature 3]
+
+### Constraints
+- [Constraint 1]
+- [Constraint 2]
+
+### Assumptions
+- [Assumption 1]
+- [Assumption 2]
+
+---
+
+## Original Idea
+
+Build a simple REST API for task management with TypeScript
+
+
+
+---
+
+## Correlation Analysis (Connect The Dots)
+
+### Related Projects
+| Project | Similarity | Reusable Components |
+|---------|------------|---------------------|
+| [Project A] | 85% | [Component list] |
+| [Project B] | 60% | [Component list] |
+
+### Overlapping Technology
+- [Tech stack overlap]
+- [Shared libraries]
+- [Common patterns]
+
+### Lessons from History
+- [Lesson 1]: [Context and outcome]
+- [Lesson 2]: [Context and outcome]
+
+---
+
+## Industry Best Practices
+
+### Architecture
+**Practice**: [Specific practice]
+**Rationale**: [Why this is recommended]
+**Sources**: [Citations]
+
+### Security
+**Practice**: [Security best practice]
+**Rationale**: [Why this matters]
+
+---
+
+## Feasibility Assessment
+
+### Technical Feasibility: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
+
+**Strengths**:
+- [Strength 1]
+- [Strength 2]
+
+**Challenges**:
+- [Challenge 1]: [Mitigation strategy]
+
+### Time Estimate: X hours
+
+**Breakdown**:
+- Research & Planning: Xh
+- Design: Xh
+- Implementation: Xh
+- Testing: Xh
+
+**Total**: X hours
+
+### Complexity: Medium
+
+**Reasoning**: [Explain complexity assessment]
+
+### Risk Assessment
+
+| Risk | Severity | Probability | Mitigation |
+|------|----------|-------------|------------|
+| [Risk 1] | High | Medium | [Mitigation strategy] |
+| [Risk 2] | Medium | Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
+
+---
+
+## Recommendations
+
+### Recommended Tech Stack
+
+**Frontend**:
+- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
+
+**Backend**:
+- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
+
+### Suggested Architecture
+
+[High-level architecture description]
+
+### Potential Issues to Watch
+
+1. **[Issue 1]**: [Monitoring approach]
+2. **[Issue 2]**: [Monitoring approach]
+
+### Next Steps (Phase 2: Approval)
+
+1. [ ] Review this report and ensure all sections are complete
+2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh1pazz_ixmt1/phase1/feasibility-report.md`
+3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
+4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 2 for Claude review and consensus
+
+---
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+- [x] Requirement summary is clear and complete
+- [ ] Correlation analysis found related work/patterns
+- [ ] Best practices are cited with sources
+- [ ] Feasibility has concrete ratings (not vague)
+- [ ] Time estimate is justified
+- [ ] Risks have mitigation strategies
+- [ ] Recommendations are actionable
+
+---
+
+## Metadata
+
+- **Generated**: 1/16/2026 11:40:42 PM
+- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
+
+---
+
+*This report was generated by the Phase 1 Research Executor.*

package/development/projects/proj_mkh4jvnb_z7rwf/phase1/feasibility-report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+# Feasibility Analysis Report
+
+**Project**: proj_mkh4jvnb_z7rwf
+**Date**: 1/17/2026 1:00:27 AM
+**Phase**: 1 - Research
+**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+> Brief overview of the project and feasibility assessment
+
+---
+
+## Requirements Summary
+
+### Problem Statement
+[What problem are we solving?]
+
+### Target Users
+[Who will use this? What are their pain points?]
+
+### Key Features
+1. [Feature 1]
+2. [Feature 2]
+3. [Feature 3]
+
+### Constraints
+- [Constraint 1]
+- [Constraint 2]
+
+### Assumptions
+- [Assumption 1]
+- [Assumption 2]
+
+---
+
+## Original Idea
+
+构建一个简单的个人博客系统，支持Markdown文章发布 --id test-project-1768582827
+
+
+
+---
+
+## Correlation Analysis (Connect The Dots)
+
+### Related Projects
+| Project | Similarity | Reusable Components |
+|---------|------------|---------------------|
+| [Project A] | 85% | [Component list] |
+| [Project B] | 60% | [Component list] |
+
+### Overlapping Technology
+- [Tech stack overlap]
+- [Shared libraries]
+- [Common patterns]
+
+### Lessons from History
+- [Lesson 1]: [Context and outcome]
+- [Lesson 2]: [Context and outcome]
+
+---
+
+## Industry Best Practices
+
+### Architecture
+**Practice**: [Specific practice]
+**Rationale**: [Why this is recommended]
+**Sources**: [Citations]
+
+### Security
+**Practice**: [Security best practice]
+**Rationale**: [Why this matters]
+
+---
+
+## Feasibility Assessment
+
+### Technical Feasibility: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
+
+**Strengths**:
+- [Strength 1]
+- [Strength 2]
+
+**Challenges**:
+- [Challenge 1]: [Mitigation strategy]
+
+### Time Estimate: X hours
+
+**Breakdown**:
+- Research & Planning: Xh
+- Design: Xh
+- Implementation: Xh
+- Testing: Xh
+
+**Total**: X hours
+
+### Complexity: Medium
+
+**Reasoning**: [Explain complexity assessment]
+
+### Risk Assessment
+
+| Risk | Severity | Probability | Mitigation |
+|------|----------|-------------|------------|
+| [Risk 1] | High | Medium | [Mitigation strategy] |
+| [Risk 2] | Medium | Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
+
+---
+
+## Recommendations
+
+### Recommended Tech Stack
+
+**Frontend**:
+- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
+
+**Backend**:
+- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
+
+### Suggested Architecture
+
+[High-level architecture description]
+
+### Potential Issues to Watch
+
+1. **[Issue 1]**: [Monitoring approach]
+2. **[Issue 2]**: [Monitoring approach]
+
+### Next Steps (Phase 2: Approval)
+
+1. [ ] Review this report and ensure all sections are complete
+2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh4jvnb_z7rwf/phase1/feasibility-report.md`
+3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
+4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 2 for Claude review and consensus
+
+---
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+- [x] Requirement summary is clear and complete
+- [ ] Correlation analysis found related work/patterns
+- [ ] Best practices are cited with sources
+- [ ] Feasibility has concrete ratings (not vague)
+- [ ] Time estimate is justified
+- [ ] Risks have mitigation strategies
+- [ ] Recommendations are actionable
+
+---
+
+## Metadata
+
+- **Generated**: 1/17/2026 1:00:27 AM
+- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
+
+---
+
+*This report was generated by the Phase 1 Research Executor.*

package/development/projects/proj_mkh4jxkd_ewz5a/phase1/feasibility-report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+# Feasibility Analysis Report
+
+**Project**: proj_mkh4jxkd_ewz5a
+**Date**: 1/17/2026 1:00:30 AM
+**Phase**: 1 - Research
+**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+> Brief overview of the project and feasibility assessment
+
+---
+
+## Requirements Summary
+
+### Problem Statement
+[What problem are we solving?]
+
+### Target Users
+[Who will use this? What are their pain points?]
+
+### Key Features
+1. [Feature 1]
+2. [Feature 2]
+3. [Feature 3]
+
+### Constraints
+- [Constraint 1]
+- [Constraint 2]
+
+### Assumptions
+- [Assumption 1]
+- [Assumption 2]
+
+---
+
+## Original Idea
+
+构建一个简单的个人博客系统，支持Markdown文章发布 --id test-project-1768582830
+
+
+
+---
+
+## Correlation Analysis (Connect The Dots)
+
+### Related Projects
+| Project | Similarity | Reusable Components |
+|---------|------------|---------------------|
+| [Project A] | 85% | [Component list] |
+| [Project B] | 60% | [Component list] |
+
+### Overlapping Technology
+- [Tech stack overlap]
+- [Shared libraries]
+- [Common patterns]
+
+### Lessons from History
+- [Lesson 1]: [Context and outcome]
+- [Lesson 2]: [Context and outcome]
+
+---
+
+## Industry Best Practices
+
+### Architecture
+**Practice**: [Specific practice]
+**Rationale**: [Why this is recommended]
+**Sources**: [Citations]
+
+### Security
+**Practice**: [Security best practice]
+**Rationale**: [Why this matters]
+
+---
+
+## Feasibility Assessment
+
+### Technical Feasibility: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
+
+**Strengths**:
+- [Strength 1]
+- [Strength 2]
+
+**Challenges**:
+- [Challenge 1]: [Mitigation strategy]
+
+### Time Estimate: X hours
+
+**Breakdown**:
+- Research & Planning: Xh
+- Design: Xh
+- Implementation: Xh
+- Testing: Xh
+
+**Total**: X hours
+
+### Complexity: Medium
+
+**Reasoning**: [Explain complexity assessment]
+
+### Risk Assessment
+
+| Risk | Severity | Probability | Mitigation |
+|------|----------|-------------|------------|
+| [Risk 1] | High | Medium | [Mitigation strategy] |
+| [Risk 2] | Medium | Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
+
+---
+
+## Recommendations
+
+### Recommended Tech Stack
+
+**Frontend**:
+- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
+
+**Backend**:
+- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
+
+### Suggested Architecture
+
+[High-level architecture description]
+
+### Potential Issues to Watch
+
+1. **[Issue 1]**: [Monitoring approach]
+2. **[Issue 2]**: [Monitoring approach]
+
+### Next Steps (Phase 2: Approval)
+
+1. [ ] Review this report and ensure all sections are complete
+2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh4jxkd_ewz5a/phase1/feasibility-report.md`
+3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
+4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 2 for Claude review and consensus
+
+---
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+- [x] Requirement summary is clear and complete
+- [ ] Correlation analysis found related work/patterns
+- [ ] Best practices are cited with sources
+- [ ] Feasibility has concrete ratings (not vague)
+- [ ] Time estimate is justified
+- [ ] Risks have mitigation strategies
+- [ ] Recommendations are actionable
+
+---
+
+## Metadata
+
+- **Generated**: 1/17/2026 1:00:30 AM
+- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
+
+---
+
+*This report was generated by the Phase 1 Research Executor.*

package/development/projects/proj_mkh4k84n_ni73k/phase1/feasibility-report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+# Feasibility Analysis Report
+
+**Project**: proj_mkh4k84n_ni73k
+**Date**: 1/17/2026 1:00:43 AM
+**Phase**: 1 - Research
+**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+> Brief overview of the project and feasibility assessment
+
+---
+
+## Requirements Summary
+
+### Problem Statement
+[What problem are we solving?]
+
+### Target Users
+[Who will use this? What are their pain points?]
+
+### Key Features
+1. [Feature 1]
+2. [Feature 2]
+3. [Feature 3]
+
+### Constraints
+- [Constraint 1]
+- [Constraint 2]
+
+### Assumptions
+- [Assumption 1]
+- [Assumption 2]
+
+---
+
+## Original Idea
+
+构建一个简单的博客系统 --id test-e2e-1768582843
+
+
+
+---
+
+## Correlation Analysis (Connect The Dots)
+
+### Related Projects
+| Project | Similarity | Reusable Components |
+|---------|------------|---------------------|
+| [Project A] | 85% | [Component list] |
+| [Project B] | 60% | [Component list] |
+
+### Overlapping Technology
+- [Tech stack overlap]
+- [Shared libraries]
+- [Common patterns]
+
+### Lessons from History
+- [Lesson 1]: [Context and outcome]
+- [Lesson 2]: [Context and outcome]
+
+---
+
+## Industry Best Practices
+
+### Architecture
+**Practice**: [Specific practice]
+**Rationale**: [Why this is recommended]
+**Sources**: [Citations]
+
+### Security
+**Practice**: [Security best practice]
+**Rationale**: [Why this matters]
+
+---
+
+## Feasibility Assessment
+
+### Technical Feasibility: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
+
+**Strengths**:
+- [Strength 1]
+- [Strength 2]
+
+**Challenges**:
+- [Challenge 1]: [Mitigation strategy]
+
+### Time Estimate: X hours
+
+**Breakdown**:
+- Research & Planning: Xh
+- Design: Xh
+- Implementation: Xh
+- Testing: Xh
+
+**Total**: X hours
+
+### Complexity: Medium
+
+**Reasoning**: [Explain complexity assessment]
+
+### Risk Assessment
+
+| Risk | Severity | Probability | Mitigation |
+|------|----------|-------------|------------|
+| [Risk 1] | High | Medium | [Mitigation strategy] |
+| [Risk 2] | Medium | Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
+
+---
+
+## Recommendations
+
+### Recommended Tech Stack
+
+**Frontend**:
+- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
+
+**Backend**:
+- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
+
+### Suggested Architecture
+
+[High-level architecture description]
+
+### Potential Issues to Watch
+
+1. **[Issue 1]**: [Monitoring approach]
+2. **[Issue 2]**: [Monitoring approach]
+
+### Next Steps (Phase 2: Approval)
+
+1. [ ] Review this report and ensure all sections are complete
+2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh4k84n_ni73k/phase1/feasibility-report.md`
+3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
+4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 2 for Claude review and consensus
+
+---
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+- [x] Requirement summary is clear and complete
+- [ ] Correlation analysis found related work/patterns
+- [ ] Best practices are cited with sources
+- [ ] Feasibility has concrete ratings (not vague)
+- [ ] Time estimate is justified
+- [ ] Risks have mitigation strategies
+- [ ] Recommendations are actionable
+
+---
+
+## Metadata
+
+- **Generated**: 1/17/2026 1:00:43 AM
+- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
+
+---
+
+*This report was generated by the Phase 1 Research Executor.*