sumulige-claude 1.1.2 → 1.2.0

package/development/projects/proj_mkh4xwhj_gch8j/phase1/feasibility-report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+# Feasibility Analysis Report
+
+**Project**: proj_mkh4xwhj_gch8j
+**Date**: 1/17/2026 1:11:22 AM
+**Phase**: 1 - Research
+**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+> Brief overview of the project and feasibility assessment
+
+---
+
+## Requirements Summary
+
+### Problem Statement
+[What problem are we solving?]
+
+### Target Users
+[Who will use this? What are their pain points?]
+
+### Key Features
+1. [Feature 1]
+2. [Feature 2]
+3. [Feature 3]
+
+### Constraints
+- [Constraint 1]
+- [Constraint 2]
+
+### Assumptions
+- [Assumption 1]
+- [Assumption 2]
+
+---
+
+## Original Idea
+
+测试
+
+
+
+---
+
+## Correlation Analysis (Connect The Dots)
+
+### Related Projects
+| Project | Similarity | Reusable Components |
+|---------|------------|---------------------|
+| [Project A] | 85% | [Component list] |
+| [Project B] | 60% | [Component list] |
+
+### Overlapping Technology
+- [Tech stack overlap]
+- [Shared libraries]
+- [Common patterns]
+
+### Lessons from History
+- [Lesson 1]: [Context and outcome]
+- [Lesson 2]: [Context and outcome]
+
+---
+
+## Industry Best Practices
+
+### Architecture
+**Practice**: [Specific practice]
+**Rationale**: [Why this is recommended]
+**Sources**: [Citations]
+
+### Security
+**Practice**: [Security best practice]
+**Rationale**: [Why this matters]
+
+---
+
+## Feasibility Assessment
+
+### Technical Feasibility: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
+
+**Strengths**:
+- [Strength 1]
+- [Strength 2]
+
+**Challenges**:
+- [Challenge 1]: [Mitigation strategy]
+
+### Time Estimate: X hours
+
+**Breakdown**:
+- Research & Planning: Xh
+- Design: Xh
+- Implementation: Xh
+- Testing: Xh
+
+**Total**: X hours
+
+### Complexity: Medium
+
+**Reasoning**: [Explain complexity assessment]
+
+### Risk Assessment
+
+| Risk | Severity | Probability | Mitigation |
+|------|----------|-------------|------------|
+| [Risk 1] | High | Medium | [Mitigation strategy] |
+| [Risk 2] | Medium | Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
+
+---
+
+## Recommendations
+
+### Recommended Tech Stack
+
+**Frontend**:
+- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
+
+**Backend**:
+- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
+
+### Suggested Architecture
+
+[High-level architecture description]
+
+### Potential Issues to Watch
+
+1. **[Issue 1]**: [Monitoring approach]
+2. **[Issue 2]**: [Monitoring approach]
+
+### Next Steps (Phase 2: Approval)
+
+1. [ ] Review this report and ensure all sections are complete
+2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh4xwhj_gch8j/phase1/feasibility-report.md`
+3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
+4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 2 for Claude review and consensus
+
+---
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+- [x] Requirement summary is clear and complete
+- [ ] Correlation analysis found related work/patterns
+- [ ] Best practices are cited with sources
+- [ ] Feasibility has concrete ratings (not vague)
+- [ ] Time estimate is justified
+- [ ] Risks have mitigation strategies
+- [ ] Recommendations are actionable
+
+---
+
+## Metadata
+
+- **Generated**: 1/17/2026 1:11:22 AM
+- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
+
+---
+
+*This report was generated by the Phase 1 Research Executor.*

package/development/projects/proj_mkh4y2qk_9lm8z/phase1/feasibility-report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+# Feasibility Analysis Report
+
+**Project**: proj_mkh4y2qk_9lm8z
+**Date**: 1/17/2026 1:11:30 AM
+**Phase**: 1 - Research
+**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+> Brief overview of the project and feasibility assessment
+
+---
+
+## Requirements Summary
+
+### Problem Statement
+[What problem are we solving?]
+
+### Target Users
+[Who will use this? What are their pain points?]
+
+### Key Features
+1. [Feature 1]
+2. [Feature 2]
+3. [Feature 3]
+
+### Constraints
+- [Constraint 1]
+- [Constraint 2]
+
+### Assumptions
+- [Assumption 1]
+- [Assumption 2]
+
+---
+
+## Original Idea
+
+构建一个简单的个人博客系统，支持Markdown文章发布
+
+
+
+---
+
+## Correlation Analysis (Connect The Dots)
+
+### Related Projects
+| Project | Similarity | Reusable Components |
+|---------|------------|---------------------|
+| [Project A] | 85% | [Component list] |
+| [Project B] | 60% | [Component list] |
+
+### Overlapping Technology
+- [Tech stack overlap]
+- [Shared libraries]
+- [Common patterns]
+
+### Lessons from History
+- [Lesson 1]: [Context and outcome]
+- [Lesson 2]: [Context and outcome]
+
+---
+
+## Industry Best Practices
+
+### Architecture
+**Practice**: [Specific practice]
+**Rationale**: [Why this is recommended]
+**Sources**: [Citations]
+
+### Security
+**Practice**: [Security best practice]
+**Rationale**: [Why this matters]
+
+---
+
+## Feasibility Assessment
+
+### Technical Feasibility: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
+
+**Strengths**:
+- [Strength 1]
+- [Strength 2]
+
+**Challenges**:
+- [Challenge 1]: [Mitigation strategy]
+
+### Time Estimate: X hours
+
+**Breakdown**:
+- Research & Planning: Xh
+- Design: Xh
+- Implementation: Xh
+- Testing: Xh
+
+**Total**: X hours
+
+### Complexity: Medium
+
+**Reasoning**: [Explain complexity assessment]
+
+### Risk Assessment
+
+| Risk | Severity | Probability | Mitigation |
+|------|----------|-------------|------------|
+| [Risk 1] | High | Medium | [Mitigation strategy] |
+| [Risk 2] | Medium | Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
+
+---
+
+## Recommendations
+
+### Recommended Tech Stack
+
+**Frontend**:
+- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
+
+**Backend**:
+- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
+
+### Suggested Architecture
+
+[High-level architecture description]
+
+### Potential Issues to Watch
+
+1. **[Issue 1]**: [Monitoring approach]
+2. **[Issue 2]**: [Monitoring approach]
+
+### Next Steps (Phase 2: Approval)
+
+1. [ ] Review this report and ensure all sections are complete
+2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh4y2qk_9lm8z/phase1/feasibility-report.md`
+3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
+4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 2 for Claude review and consensus
+
+---
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+- [x] Requirement summary is clear and complete
+- [ ] Correlation analysis found related work/patterns
+- [ ] Best practices are cited with sources
+- [ ] Feasibility has concrete ratings (not vague)
+- [ ] Time estimate is justified
+- [ ] Risks have mitigation strategies
+- [ ] Recommendations are actionable
+
+---
+
+## Metadata
+
+- **Generated**: 1/17/2026 1:11:30 AM
+- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
+
+---
+
+*This report was generated by the Phase 1 Research Executor.*

package/development/projects/proj_mkh4y2qk_9lm8z/phase2/requirements.md

@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+# Requirements Document
+
+**Project**: proj_mkh4y2qk_9lm8z
+**Date**: 1/17/2026 1:34:30 AM
+**Phase**: 2 - Approval
+**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+> Brief overview of the approved requirements
+
+**Based on**: Phase 1 Feasibility Report (`../phase1/feasibility-report.md`)
+
+---
+
+## Phase 1 Summary
+
+### Original Idea
+构建一个简单的个人博客系统，支持Markdown文章发布
+
+
+
+---
+
+### Feasibility Assessment
+[From Phase 1 Report]
+
+---
+
+## Clarification Questions & Responses
+
+## Clarification Questions
+
+> Based on the feasibility analysis, the following questions need clarification:
+
+### Scope & Priorities
+1. **MVP Scope**: What is the minimum viable scope for the first iteration?
+   - [ ] Define core features that must be in v1.0
+   - [ ] Identify features that can be deferred to later versions
+
+2. **Priority Order**: Which features are highest priority?
+   - [ ] Rank features by business value
+   - [ ] Identify any dependencies between features
+
+### Technical Decisions
+3. **Tech Stack Confirmation**: Confirm the recommended technology choices
+   - [ ] Frontend: See Phase 1
+   - [ ] Backend: See Phase 1
+   - [ ] Any constraints or preferences?
+
+4. **Integration Points**: Are there existing systems to integrate with?
+   - [ ] APIs to connect to
+   - [ ] Data migration needs
+   - [ ] Third-party service dependencies
+
+### Success Definition
+5. **Success Criteria**: How will we know this project is successful?
+   - [ ] Define measurable outcomes
+   - [ ] Set success metrics for post-launch
+
+### Constraints
+6. **Timeline Constraints**: Any deadline requirements?
+   - [ ] Hard deadlines (e.g., launch date)
+   - [ ] Time constraints for specific phases
+
+7. **Resource Constraints**: Any limitations on resources?
+   - [ ] Budget constraints
+   - [ ] Team size/skills availability
+   - [ ] Infrastructure limitations
+
+---
+*Add user responses below each question. Once consensus is reached, proceed to requirements definition.*
+
+
+---
+
+## Functional Requirements
+
+### FR-001: [Requirement Title]
+
+**Description**: [Clear, unambiguous description of what the system should do]
+
+**Priority**: Must Have / Should Have / Could Have / Won't Have
+
+**Acceptance Criteria**:
+- [ ] Given [context], when [action], then [outcome]
+- [ ] Given [context], when [action], then [outcome]
+- [ ] Given [context], when [action], then [outcome]
+
+**Dependencies**: [Other requirements or systems this depends on]
+
+---
+
+### FR-002: [Requirement Title]
+
+**Description**: [Clear, unambiguous description]
+
+**Priority**: Must Have / Should Have / Could Have / Won't Have
+
+**Acceptance Criteria**:
+- [ ] Given [context], when [action], then [outcome]
+- [ ] Given [context], when [action], then [outcome]
+
+**Dependencies**: [List dependencies]
+
+---
+
+## Non-Functional Requirements
+
+### Performance
+- **Response Time**: [e.g., API requests < 200ms p95]
+- **Throughput**: [e.g., 1000 concurrent users]
+- **Resource Limits**: [e.g., Memory < 512MB]
+
+### Security
+- **Authentication**: [e.g., JWT tokens, OAuth 2.0]
+- **Authorization**: [e.g., Role-based access control]
+- **Data Protection**: [e.g., Encryption at rest and in transit]
+
+### Reliability
+- **Uptime Target**: [e.g., 99.9% availability]
+- **Failure Handling**: [Graceful degradation strategy]
+
+### Maintainability
+- **Code Quality**: [e.g., Test coverage > 80%]
+- **Documentation**: [API documentation, code comments]
+
+### Compatibility
+- **Browsers**: [Supported browser versions]
+- **Platforms**: [Supported operating systems]
+- **API Versions**: [Versioning strategy]
+
+---
+
+## Success Metrics
+
+### User Engagement
+| Metric | Target | Measurement Method |
+|--------|--------|-------------------|
+| [e.g., Daily Active Users] | [value] | [analytics tool] |
+| [e.g., Session Duration] | [value] | [analytics tool] |
+
+### Technical Performance
+| Metric | Target | Measurement Method |
+|--------|--------|-------------------|
+| [e.g., Page Load Time] | [value] | [monitoring tool] |
+| [e.g., Error Rate] | [value] | [monitoring tool] |
+
+### Business Outcomes
+| Metric | Target | Measurement Method |
+|--------|--------|-------------------|
+| [e.g., Conversion Rate] | [value] | [analytics tool] |
+| [e.g., Customer Satisfaction] | [value] | [survey] |
+
+---
+
+## Edge Cases & Constraints
+
+### Edge Cases
+- [Edge Case 1]: [Handling strategy]
+- [Edge Case 2]: [Handling strategy]
+- [Edge Case 3]: [Handling strategy]
+
+### Constraints
+- **Technical**: [Technical limitations]
+- **Business**: [Business rules or constraints]
+- **Legal**: [Compliance requirements]
+- **Timeline**: [Deadline constraints]
+
+---
+
+## Assumptions & Dependencies
+
+### Assumptions
+- [Assumption 1]: [Impact if false]
+- [Assumption 2]: [Impact if false]
+
+### Dependencies
+- **Internal**: [Internal system dependencies]
+- **External**: [Third-party services or APIs]
+- **Team**: [Required team roles or skills]
+
+---
+
+## Out of Scope
+
+Explicitly list what is NOT included in this phase:
+
+- [Out of Scope Item 1]: [Reason for exclusion]
+- [Out of Scope Item 2]: [Reason for exclusion]
+- [Out of Scope Item 3]: [Reason for exclusion]
+
+---
+
+## Approval Checklist
+
+- [x] Requirements are clear and unambiguous
+- [ ] Acceptance criteria are testable
+- [ ] Technical rationale is documented
+- [ ] Success metrics are quantifiable
+- [ ] Edge cases are identified
+- [ ] Constraints are documented
+- [ ] Stakeholder consensus achieved
+
+---
+
+## Next Steps (Phase 3: Planning)
+
+1. [ ] Review requirements with all stakeholders
+2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh4y2qk_9lm8z/phase2/requirements.md`
+3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
+4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 3 for detailed design and planning
+
+---
+
+## Metadata
+
+- **Generated**: 1/17/2026 1:34:30 AM
+- **Phase 1 Report**: `../phase1/feasibility-report.md`
+- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
+
+---
+
+*This document was generated by the Phase 2 Approval Executor.*