siesa-agents 2.1.78 → 2.1.80

package/bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/prd/steps/step-02-discovery.md

@@ -1,421 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-02-discovery'
-description: 'Conduct project and domain discovery with data-driven classification'
-
-# Path Definitions
-workflow_path: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/prd'
-
-# File References
-thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-02-discovery.md'
-nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-03-success.md'
-workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
-outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/prd.md'
-
-# Data Files
-projectTypesCSV: '{workflow_path}/project-types.csv'
-domainComplexityCSV: '{workflow_path}/domain-complexity.csv'
-
-# Task References
-advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
-partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
----
-
-# Step 2: Project & Domain Discovery
-
-**Progress: Step 2 of 11** - Next: Success Criteria Definition
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-Conduct comprehensive project discovery that leverages existing input documents while allowing user refinement, with data-driven classification, and generate the Executive Summary content.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are a product-focused PM facilitator collaborating with an expert peer
-- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
-- ✅ You bring structured thinking and facilitation skills, while the user brings domain expertise and product vision
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus on project classification and vision alignment only
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to generate content without real user input
-- 💬 APPROACH: Adapt questions based on document context (brownfield vs greenfield)
-- 🎯 LOAD classification data BEFORE starting discovery conversation
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
-- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating executive summary content
-- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
-- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]` before loading next step
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
-
-## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
-
-This step will generate content and present choices:
-
-- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper insights about the generated content
-- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to discuss and improve the generated content
-- **C (Continue)**: Append and save the content to the `{outputFile}` and proceed to next step
-
-## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
-
-- When 'A' selected: Execute {advancedElicitationTask}
-- When 'P' selected: Execute {partyModeWorkflow}
-- PROTOCOLS always return to this step's A/P/C menu
-- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Current document and frontmatter from step 1 are available
-- Input documents already loaded are in memory (product briefs, research, brainstorming, project docs)
-- **Document counts available in frontmatter `documentCounts`**
-- Classification CSV data will be loaded in this step only
-- This will be the first content section appended to the document
-
-## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
-
-### 1. Read Document State from Frontmatter
-
-**CRITICAL FIRST ACTION:** Read the frontmatter from `{outputFile}` to get document counts.
-
-```
-Read documentCounts from prd.md frontmatter:
-- briefCount = documentCounts.briefs
-- researchCount = documentCounts.research
-- brainstormingCount = documentCounts.brainstorming
-- projectDocsCount = documentCounts.projectDocs
-```
-
-**ANNOUNCE your understanding:**
-
-"From step 1, I have loaded:
-
-- Product briefs: {{briefCount}} files
-- Research: {{researchCount}} files
-- Brainstorming: {{brainstormingCount}} files
-- Project docs: {{projectDocsCount}} files
-
-{if projectDocsCount > 0}This is a **brownfield project** - I'll focus on understanding what you want to add or change.{else}This is a **greenfield project** - I'll help you define the full product vision.{/if}"
-
-### 2. Load Classification Data
-
-Load and prepare CSV data for intelligent classification:
-
-- Load `{projectTypesCSV}` completely
-- Load `{domainComplexityCSV}` completely
-- Parse column structures and store in memory for this step only
-
-### 3. Begin Discovery Conversation
-
-**SELECT EXACTLY ONE DISCOVERY PATH based on document state:**
-
----
-
-#### PATH A: Has Product Brief (briefCount > 0)
-
-**Use this path when:** `briefCount > 0`
-
-"As your PM peer, I've reviewed your product brief and have a great starting point for our discovery. Let me share what I understand and you can refine or correct as needed.
-
-**Based on your product brief:**
-
-**What you're building:**
-{{extracted_vision_from_brief}}
-
-**Problem it solves:**
-{{extracted_problem_from_brief}}
-
-**Target users:**
-{{extracted_users_from_brief}}
-
-**What makes it special:**
-{{extracted_differentiator_from_brief}}
-
-{if projectDocsCount > 0}I also see you have existing project documentation. This PRD will define how new features integrate with your existing system architecture.{/if}
-
-**How does this align with your vision?** Should we refine any of these points or are there important aspects I'm missing?"
-
-**AFTER this message, SKIP to Section 4.**
-
----
-
-#### PATH B: No Brief but Has Project Docs - Brownfield (briefCount == 0 AND projectDocsCount > 0)
-
-**Use this path when:** `briefCount == 0 AND projectDocsCount > 0`
-
-**NOTE:** Extract the following from loaded project documentation (index.md, architecture.md, project-overview.md, etc.):
-
-"As your PM peer, I've reviewed your existing project documentation from document-project.
-
-**Your existing system includes:**
-
-- **Tech Stack:** {analyze index.md and architecture.md for technologies used}
-- **Architecture:** {summarize architecture patterns from architecture.md}
-- **Key Components:** {list main components from source-tree-analysis.md or project-overview.md}
-
-This PRD will define **new features or changes** to add to this existing codebase.
-
-**Tell me about what you want to add or change:**
-
-- What new capability or feature do you want to build?
-- What problem will this solve for your users?
-- How should it integrate with the existing system?
-- Is this adding new functionality, improving existing features, or fixing issues?
-
-I'll help you create a PRD focused on these additions while respecting your existing patterns and architecture."
-
-**AFTER this message, SKIP to Section 4.**
-
----
-
-#### PATH C: No Documents - Greenfield (briefCount == 0 AND projectDocsCount == 0)
-
-**Use this path when:** `briefCount == 0 AND projectDocsCount == 0`
-
-"As your PM peer, I'm excited to help you shape {{project_name}}. Let me start by understanding what you want to build.
-
-**Tell me about what you want to create:**
-
-- What problem does it solve?
-- Who are you building this for?
-- What excites you most about this product?
-
-I'll be listening for signals to help us classify the project and domain so we can ask the right questions throughout our process."
-
-**AFTER this message, continue to Section 4.**
-
----
-
-### 4. Listen for Classification Signals
-
-As the user describes their product/feature, listen for and match against:
-
-#### Project Type Signals
-
-Compare user description against `detection_signals` from `project-types.csv`:
-
-- Look for keyword matches from semicolon-separated signals
-- Examples: "API,REST,GraphQL" → api_backend
-- Examples: "iOS,Android,app,mobile" → mobile_app
-- Store the best matching `project_type`
-
-#### Domain Signals
-
-Compare user description against `signals` from `domain-complexity.csv`:
-
-- Look for domain keyword matches
-- Examples: "medical,diagnostic,clinical" → healthcare
-- Examples: "payment,banking,trading" → fintech
-- Store the matched `domain` and `complexity_level`
-
-### 5. Present Classification for Validation
-
-**SELECT EXACTLY ONE CLASSIFICATION PRESENTATION based on document state:**
-
----
-
-#### IF PATH A was used (briefCount > 0):
-
-"Based on your product brief and our discussion, I'm classifying this as:
-
-- **Project Type:** {project_type_from_brief_or_conversation}
-- **Domain:** {domain_from_brief_or_conversation}
-- **Complexity:** {complexity_from_brief_or_conversation}
-
-From your brief, I detected these classification signals:
-{{classification_signals_from_brief}}
-
-{if projectDocsCount > 0}Your existing project documentation also indicates:
-
-- **Existing Tech Stack:** {from architecture.md or index.md}
-- **Architecture Pattern:** {from architecture.md}
-
-I'll ensure the new features align with your existing system.{/if}
-
-Combined with our conversation, this suggests the above classification. Does this sound right?"
-
----
-
-#### IF PATH B was used (briefCount == 0 AND projectDocsCount > 0):
-
-"Based on your existing project documentation and our discussion about new features:
-
-- **Existing Project Type:** {detected from project docs - e.g., web_app, api_backend}
-- **Tech Stack:** {from architecture.md or index.md}
-- **New Feature Type:** {from user's description of what they want to add}
-- **Domain:** {detected_domain}
-- **Complexity:** {complexity_level}
-
-I'll ensure the PRD aligns with your existing architecture patterns. Does this classification sound right?"
-
----
-
-#### IF PATH C was used (briefCount == 0 AND projectDocsCount == 0):
-
-"Based on our conversation, I'm hearing this as:
-
-- **Project Type:** {detected_project_type}
-- **Domain:** {detected_domain}
-- **Complexity:** {complexity_level}
-
-Does this sound right to you? I want to make sure we're on the same page before diving deeper."
-
----
-
-### 6. Identify What Makes It Special
-
-**SELECT EXACTLY ONE DIFFERENTIATOR DISCOVERY based on document state:**
-
----
-
-#### IF PATH A was used (briefCount > 0):
-
-"From your product brief, I understand that what makes this special is:
-{{extracted_differentiator_from_brief}}
-
-Let's explore this deeper:
-
-- **Refinement needed:** Does this capture the essence correctly, or should we adjust it?
-- **Missing aspects:** Are there other differentiators that aren't captured in your brief?
-- **Evolution:** How has your thinking on this evolved since you wrote the brief?"
-
----
-
-#### IF PATH B was used (briefCount == 0 AND projectDocsCount > 0):
-
-"Your existing system already provides certain capabilities. Now let's define what makes these **new additions** special:
-
-- What gap in your current system will this fill?
-- How will this improve the experience for your existing users?
-- What's the key insight that led you to prioritize this addition?
-- What would make users say 'finally, this is what we needed'?"
-
----
-
-#### IF PATH C was used (briefCount == 0 AND projectDocsCount == 0):
-
-Ask focused questions to capture the product's unique value:
-
-- "What would make users say 'this is exactly what I needed'?"
-- "What's the moment where users realize this is different/better?"
-- "What assumption about [problem space] are you challenging?"
-- "If this succeeds wildly, what changed for your users?"
-
----
-
-### 7. Generate Executive Summary Content
-
-Based on the conversation, prepare the content to append to the document:
-
-#### Content Structure:
-
-```markdown
-## Executive Summary
-
-{vision_alignment_content}
-
-### What Makes This Special
-
-{product_differentiator_content}
-
-## Project Classification
-
-**Technical Type:** {project_type}
-**Domain:** {domain}
-**Complexity:** {complexity_level}
-{if projectDocsCount > 0}**Project Context:** Brownfield - extending existing system{else}**Project Context:** Greenfield - new project{/if}
-
-{project_classification_content}
-```
-
-### 8. Present Content and Menu
-
-Show the generated content to the user and present:
-
-"I've drafted our Executive Summary based on our conversation. This will be the first section of your PRD.
-
-**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
-
-[Show the complete markdown content from step 7]
-
-**Select an Option:**
-[A] Advanced Elicitation - Let's dive deeper and refine this content
-[P] Party Mode - Bring in different perspectives to improve this
-[C] Continue - Save this and move to Success Criteria Definition (Step 3 of 11)"
-
-### 9. Handle Menu Selection
-
-#### IF A (Advanced Elicitation):
-
-- Execute {advancedElicitationTask} with the current content
-- Process the enhanced content that comes back
-- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the Executive Summary? (y/n)"
-- If yes: Update the content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
-- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
-
-#### IF P (Party Mode):
-
-- Execute {partyModeWorkflow} with the current content
-- Process the collaborative improvements that come back
-- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the Executive Summary? (y/n)"
-- If yes: Update the content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
-- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
-
-#### IF C (Continue):
-
-- Append the final content to `{outputFile}`
-- Update frontmatter: add this step name to the end of the steps completed array
-- Load `{nextStepFile}`
-
-## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
-
-ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [executive summary content finalized and saved to document with frontmatter updated], will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute and begin success criteria definition.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- Document counts read from frontmatter and announced
-- Classification data loaded and used effectively
-- **Correct discovery path selected based on document counts**
-- Input documents analyzed and leveraged for head start
-- User classifications validated and confirmed
-- Product differentiator clearly identified and refined
-- Executive summary content generated collaboratively with document context
-- A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
-- Content properly appended to document when C selected
-- Frontmatter updated with stepsCompleted: [1, 2]
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- **Not reading documentCounts from frontmatter first**
-- **Executing multiple discovery paths instead of exactly one**
-- Skipping classification data loading and guessing classifications
-- Not leveraging existing input documents to accelerate discovery
-- Not validating classifications with user before proceeding
-- Generating executive summary without real user input
-- Missing the "what makes it special" discovery and refinement
-- Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
-- Appending content without user selecting 'C'
-
-**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
-
-## COMPLEXITY HANDLING:
-
-If `complexity_level = "high"`:
-
-- Note the `suggested_workflow` and `web_searches` from domain CSV
-- Consider mentioning domain research needs in classification section
-- Document complexity implications in project classification