mindforge-cc 8.2.0 → 9.0.0

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge:architecture.md

@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Design systems with appropriate complexity - no more, no less.
----
-# 🏗️ /mindforge:architecture
-
-<instruction>
-Architect robust systems with clear boundaries, explicit trade-offs, and justified complexity using the MindForge System Architecture framework.
-</instruction>
-
-<context>
-Follow the architectural governance defined in [.agent/skills/mindforge-system-architecture/SKILL.md](.agent/skills/mindforge-system-architecture/SKILL.md).
-</context>
-
-<rules>
-- **Justify Complexity**: Every architectural addition must solve a documented problem.
-- **Define Boundaries**: Ensure clear separation of concerns between services/modules.
-- **Traceability**: All decisions must be mapped to project requirements.
-- **Scale-Awareness**: Design for the next order of magnitude, but implement for the current one.
-</rules>
-
-<process>
-1.  **Constraint Analysis**: Clarify scale, team size, and system lifespan.
-2.  **Domain Mapping**: Identify core entities and their relationships.
-3.  **Data Flow Design**: Map end-to-end flows and state transitions.
-4.  **Complexity Audit**: Run the [Scaling Checklist](.agent/skills/mindforge-system-architecture/scaling-checklist.md) to eliminate over-engineering.
-5.  **Trade-off Matrix**: Document selected approach vs. alternatives with pros/cons.
-</process>
-
-<supporting_documents>
-- [Architecture Examples](.agent/skills/mindforge-system-architecture/examples.md)
-- [Complexity Checklist](.agent/skills/mindforge-system-architecture/scaling-checklist.md)
-</supporting_documents>
-
-<output_format>
-Produce an `ARCHITECTURE.md` draft or update containing:
-- Executive Summary
-- Component/Service Diagram (Mermaid)
-- Data Flow Overview
-- Trade-off Analysis
-</output_format>

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge:audit.md

@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Query .planning/AUDIT.jsonl by phase, event, date, severity, integration, or
----
-Query `.planning/AUDIT.jsonl` by phase, event, date, severity, integration, or
- agent. Usage: `/mindforge:audit [filters]`
-
-## Supported options
-- `--phase N`
-- `--event NAME`
-- `--agent NAME`
-- `--severity LEVEL`
-- `--date YYYY-MM-DD`
-- `--summary`
-- `--verify`
-- `--export PATH`
-
-## Summary mode
-Summarise counts by event, severity, integration, and phase.
-Entries with `"phase": null` are reported as `project-level`, not dropped.
-
-## Verify mode
-Validate JSONL shape and chronological ordering.
-Timestamp comparison may use string comparison because ISO-8601 UTC timestamps
- with a `Z` suffix sort lexicographically.
-
-## Archive rotation
-If the active audit log exceeds 10,000 lines, rotate it into
- `.planning/audit-archive/` before continuing heavy writes. Rotation must never
- delete history; it archives then resets the active file.
-
-## Export safety
-Validate export paths stay inside the project directory. If a path traversal or
- unsafe destination is requested, export into `.planning/` instead.

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge:auto.md

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Starts the MindForge Autonomous Execution Engine for the
----
-# /mindforge:auto [Phase N]
-
-**Purpose**: Starts the MindForge Autonomous Execution Engine for the
-specified phase. The agent will execute all waves, handle repairs, and
-perform compliance gates without requiring human confirmation.
-
-## Usage
-- `/mindforge:auto --phase 3` (Standard unattended mode)
-- `/mindforge:auto --resume` (Resumes from last checkpoint)
-- `/mindforge:auto --headless` (CI/CD optimized output)
-- `/mindforge:auto --dry-run` (Show the wave DAG and plan without executing)
-
-## Behavior
-- **Zero-Interaction**: Auto-approves Tier 1/2 changes if gates pass.
-- **Self-Repair**: Tries RETRY/DECOMPOSE before asking for help.
-- **Checkpointing**: Constant state persistence in `HANDOFF.json`.
-- **Governance**: ESCALATES on Tier 3 changes (Auth/Payment/PII).
-
-## Environment Variables
-- `AUTO_MODE_TIMEOUT_MINUTES`: Default 120.
-- `AUTO_PUSH_ON_WAVE_COMPLETE`: Default false.
-- `SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL`: Required for notifications.

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge:benchmark.md

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Measure skill effectiveness over time.
----
-# MindForge — Benchmark Command
-# Usage: /mindforge:benchmark [--skill skill-name] [--compare skill-a skill-b]
-
-Measure skill effectiveness over time.
-
-## Single skill benchmark
-For a named skill, analyse AUDIT.jsonl and skill-usage.jsonl:
-- How many times was the skill loaded this month?
-- What is the verify pass rate for tasks where this skill was loaded?
-- Are there anti-patterns less common after this skill is loaded?
-- What is the average session quality score when this skill is active?
-
-Report:
-```
-Skill Benchmark: security-review v1.0.0
-────────────────────────────────────────
-Usage (last 30 days): 47 task loads
-Trigger distribution: text match 68%, file-path 22%, file-name 10%
-Verify pass rate:     91% (vs. 84% baseline without this skill)
-Security findings:    8 HIGH caught (0 CRITICAL missed in tasks using this skill)
-Session quality lift: +6.2 points average when loaded
-
-Assessment: HIGH VALUE — clear quality improvement signal
-```
-
-## Skill comparison
-Compare two skills head-to-head:
-- Load frequency
-- Verify pass rate improvement
-- Anti-pattern detection rate
-- Context budget cost (token estimate)
-
-Helps decide: should you keep both skills, or deprecate the lower-performer?

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge:brainstorming.md

@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
----
-description: You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
----
-# 🧠 /mindforge:brainstorming
-
-## Step 0 — Protocol Activation
-
-**MANDATORY**: Invoke the `mindforge-brainstorming` skill.
-This ensures the creative exploration, architectural trade-offs, and requirement gathering are handled with maximum depth.
-
-## Process
-
-1. **Intake**: Gather the core idea or feature request from the user.
-2. **Exploration**: Use the brainstorming skill to explore the "Why", "How", and "What".
-3. **Refinement**: Narrow down the options to a concrete architectural direction.
-4. **Handoff**: Generate a prompt or a requirements fragment for the next planning phase.

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge:browse.md

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
----
-description: @mindforge browse <url | action>
----
-# /mindforge:browse
-
-## Usage
-`@mindforge browse <url | action>`
-
-## Description
-Controls the persistent MindForge browser daemon. 
-Maintains session state (cookies/localStorage) for the AI.
-
-## Actions
-| Action | Description |
-|---|---|
-| `--start` | Initialize browser daemon |
-| `--stop` | Kill browser daemon |
-| `--status` | Show daemon health and active sessions |
-| `--session <name>` | Switch browser context |
-| `--import-session <name> --from <browser>` | Import cookies from host browser (chrome, arc, etc) |
-| `<url>` | Navigate the current page to URL |
-| `click <selector>` | Trigger click event |
-| `type <sel> <text>` | Fill input field |
-| `screenshot` | Capture current viewport |
-
-## Security
-- Daemon binds to `127.0.0.1` only.
-- Session files are gitignored.
-- Use only for debugging and visual verification.

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge:complete-milestone.md

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Archive a completed milestone, generate a release report, and prepare the next
----
-Archive a completed milestone, generate a release report, and prepare the next
- milestone. Usage: `/mindforge:complete-milestone <name> <version>`
-
-## Step 1 — Validate milestone completion
-Ensure every included phase is verified and has no pending blocking approvals.
-
-## Step 2 — Generate milestone report
-Summarise shipped phases, notable changes, risks, approvals, and unresolved
- follow-ups.
-
-## Step 3 — Archive milestone artifacts
-Archive only the phases included in the milestone, not the entire
- `.planning/phases/` directory. Preserve history in the archive while keeping
- active planning files available in place.
-
-## Step 4 — Release metadata
-Create the release tag, update `STATE.md` with milestone summary, and mark the
- project ready for the next version.

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge:costs.md

@@ -1,14 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Real-time cost tracking for all AI model usage.
----
-# MindForge v2 — Costs Command
-# Usage: /mindforge:costs [--phase N] [--session ID] [--window 7d]
-
-## Purpose
-Real-time cost tracking for all AI model usage.
-Enforce daily budgets and see per-model spend.
-
-## Metrics
-- Total spend: $X.XX
-- Daily limit usage: XX%
-- Per-model breakdown (Tokens/Cost)

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge:cross-review.md

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Get the same code diff reviewed by multiple AI models simultaneously.
----
-# MindForge v2 — Cross-Review Command
-# Usage: /mindforge:cross-review [--phase N] [--models list] [--focus area]
-
-## Purpose
-Get the same code diff reviewed by multiple AI models simultaneously.
-Claude finds what Claude finds. GPT-4o finds what GPT-4o finds.
-Consensus findings = high confidence issues.
-
-## Round 1: Primary (Claude)
-Senior architect review.
-
-## Round 2: Adversarial (GPT-4o)
-Critical security and edge case review.
-
-## Synthesis
-Consensus detector filters findings.
-Verdict is gating for `/mindforge:ship`.

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge:dashboard.md

@@ -1,101 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Start the MindForge real-time web dashboard — a live observability UI for the
----
-# MindForge v2 — Dashboard Command
-# Usage: /mindforge:dashboard [--port 7339] [--open] [--stop] [--status]
-# Version: v2.0.0-alpha.5
-
-## Purpose
-Start the MindForge real-time web dashboard — a live observability UI for the
-entire team. Shows execution progress, quality metrics, pending approvals,
-knowledge graph, and team activity without requiring CLI access.
-
-## Design
-The dashboard is a localhost-only web server:
-- No build step — single HTML file, no bundler, no npm packages on client
-- No authentication — binding to 127.0.0.1 is the security model
-- Live updates via Server-Sent Events — no WebSocket library needed
-- Designed for screensharing at standups, not external access
-
-## Usage
-
-### Start the dashboard
-```
-/mindforge:dashboard
-→ Dashboard running at: http://localhost:7339
-→ Press CTRL+C to stop (or /mindforge:dashboard --stop)
-```
-
-### Start and open in browser
-```
-/mindforge:dashboard --open
-→ Opens http://localhost:7339 in your default browser
-```
-
-### Custom port
-```
-/mindforge:dashboard --port 7340
-→ Useful if 7339 is already in use
-```
-
-### Stop the dashboard
-```
-/mindforge:dashboard --stop
-→ Finds the running dashboard process (from PID file) and sends SIGTERM
-```
-
-### Check dashboard status
-```
-/mindforge:dashboard --status
-→ Checks if dashboard is running, shows port and PID
-→ Also shows: http://localhost:7339/api/status
-```
-
-## Dashboard pages
-
-### Activity (default)
-- Phase name, auto mode status (RUNNING/PAUSED/ESCALATED/IDLE)
-- Wave progress bar (tasks completed / total)
-- Live AUDIT event feed with color-coded event types
-- Steering input: send guidance to auto mode without touching the CLI
-
-### Quality Metrics
-- Session quality score trend (last 20 sessions)
-- Verify pass rate over time
-- Security findings by severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
-- Cost per session trend
-
-### Approvals
-- All pending Tier 2/3 governance requests
-- [Approve] and [Reject] buttons — no CLI needed for approval
-- Tier, phase/plan, description, time since requested, expiry warning
-- Recent approval history
-
-### Knowledge
-- Search the knowledge graph from the browser
-- Entries filtered by confidence, type, tags
-- Color-coded by knowledge type
-
-### Team
-- Active developers (by git email, from AUDIT.jsonl)
-- What each person is working on (last task)
-- File conflict warnings (two developers recently touching the same file)
-
-## Security rules
-1. Never expose the dashboard on 0.0.0.0 — localhost only
-2. Never forward the port externally (no ngrok, no port forwarding)
-3. For remote team visibility: screenshare your browser instead
-4. The dashboard shows project details including code patterns and decisions
-
-## Integration with auto mode
-When `/mindforge:auto` is running and the dashboard is open:
-- Activity feed updates live as tasks complete
-- Wave progress bar advances in real-time
-- Any escalations appear immediately with red indicator
-- The Steering input is active — inject guidance without a second terminal
-
-## AUDIT entry
-```json
-{ "event": "dashboard_started", "port": 7339, "pid": 12345 }
-{ "event": "dashboard_stopped", "pid": 12345 }
-```

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge:debug.md

@@ -1,131 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Systematic debugging using the Debug Specialist persona with full RCA protocol.
----
-# MindForge — Debug Command
-# Usage: /mindforge:debug [description]
-
-Systematic debugging using the Debug Specialist persona with full RCA protocol.
-
-## Activation
-
-## Step 0 — Activate Extended Debugging Protocol
-
-**MANDATORY**: Invoke the `mindforge-debug_extended` skill.
-This ensures the full scientific root-cause investigation depth is applied to this session.
-
-## Step 1 — Intake
-
-Ask the user:
-1. "Describe the problem. What is happening vs. what should happen?"
-2. "Can you reproduce it reliably? If yes: what are the exact steps?"
-3. "When did this start? Was it working before? What changed?"
-4. "Do you have an error message or stack trace? Paste it here."
-
-Capture all answers before proceeding.
-
-## Step 2 — Triage
-
-Classify the issue immediately:
-- **Regression** (was working, now broken) → check recent commits
-- **Never worked** (new feature failing) → check the plan and verify step
-- **Environment issue** (works locally, fails in CI) → check environment diffs
-- **Data issue** (specific data causes failure) → check data shape assumptions
-- **Integration issue** (fails when calling external service) → check contracts
-
-Report classification to user: "This looks like a [type] issue. Here's my approach..."
-
-## Step 3 — Follow Debug Specialist protocol
-
-Execute the full protocol from `debug-specialist.md`:
-1. Reproduce
-2. Isolate
-3. Read the error
-4. Check recent changes
-5. Instrument
-6. Form hypothesis
-7. Test hypothesis (write a failing test)
-8. Fix
-9. Verify (test from step 7 now passes, no regressions)
-10. Document
-
-At each step, report what was found before moving to the next step.
-Do not skip steps or combine them.
-
-## Step 3b — Full test suite verification (mandatory)
-After the fix and targeted verify pass, run the project's full test suite.
-Do not mark the debug task complete if any tests fail.
-
-## Step 4 — Check recent git history
-
-```bash
-git log --oneline -20
-git diff HEAD~[N] HEAD -- [suspected file]
-```
-
-If a recent commit is the likely cause, show the user the specific diff.
-
-## Step 5 — Write the RCA report
-
-Create `.planning/phases/[current-phase]/DEBUG-[timestamp].md`:
-
-```markdown
-# Debug Report — [short description]
-
-## Date
-[ISO-8601]
-
-## Problem
-[User's description + what was verified during debugging]
-
-## Root cause category
-[Logic error / Data error / Integration error / Concurrency error /
-Configuration error / Dependency error]
-
-## Root cause
-[Precise description of what the actual cause was]
-
-## Evidence
-- [How the root cause was confirmed]
-- [Failing test that proved the bug: file:line]
-
-## Fix applied
-- File: [path]
-- Change: [description]
-- Commit: [SHA]
-
-## Regression test
-[Test written to prevent this from recurring: file:line]
-
-## Prevention
-[What should change in process/code to prevent this class of bug]
-```
-
-## Step 6 — Write AUDIT entry
-
-```json
-{
-  "id": "uuid",
-  "timestamp": "ISO-8601",
-  "event": "debug_completed",
-  "agent": "mindforge-debug-specialist",
-  "phase": [current phase or null],
-  "session_id": "sess_abc",
-  "issue_type": "regression",
-  "root_cause_category": "Logic error",
-  "root_cause_summary": "[one sentence]",
-  "commit_sha": "[fix commit sha]",
-  "regression_test_added": true,
-  "report_path": ".planning/phases/[N]/DEBUG-[timestamp].md"
-}
-```
-
-## When the bug cannot be reproduced
-
-Ask:
-1. "Does it happen every time or intermittently?"
-2. "Does it happen in specific environments only? (dev/staging/prod)"
-3. "Does it happen for specific users or all users?"
-
-If intermittent: focus on concurrency, caching, and race conditions.
-Write a monitoring/logging plan to catch the next occurrence.
-Document the inconclusive investigation in the DEBUG report with evidence gathered.

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge:discuss-phase.md

@@ -1,141 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Planning without discussion produces generic plans.
----
-# MindForge — Discuss Phase Command
-# Usage: /mindforge:discuss-phase [N] [--batch] [--auto]
-# Captures implementation decisions before planning begins.
-# Run this BEFORE /mindforge:plan-phase for complex phases.
-
-## Purpose
-Planning without discussion produces generic plans.
-Discussion captures YOUR decisions — layout preferences, library choices,
-UX specifics, edge cases you've already thought through — so the planner
-builds what you actually want, not what seems reasonable.
-
-## When to use
-- Any phase with UI/UX components (visual decisions need capturing)
-- Any phase with multiple valid implementation approaches
-- Any phase where you already have opinions on the approach
-- Any phase touching external services (your preferences on APIs matter)
-- Skip for trivial phases (e.g., "add one field to an existing form")
-
-## Step 1 — Analyse the phase scope
-
-Read:
-- ROADMAP.md for the phase description
-- REQUIREMENTS.md for the requirements in this phase
-- ARCHITECTURE.md for relevant architectural context
-
-Identify the phase's primary domain and any secondary domains.
-If multiple domains are involved, cover each relevant set of questions.
-- **Visual/UI** → ask about layout, interactions, states, empty states, animations
-- **API/Backend** → ask about response format, error handling, auth approach, versioning
-- **Data/Database** → ask about schema design, migration strategy, data volume expectations
-- **Integration** → ask about third-party API choices, error recovery, retry strategy
-- **Infrastructure** → ask about deployment strategy, scaling approach, observability
-
-## Step 2 — Structured discussion
-
-Ask questions ONE AT A TIME. Wait for the full answer before asking the next.
-Do not batch questions (unless `--batch` flag is provided).
-
-### Visual/UI phases — ask about:
-1. "Walk me through what a user sees on this screen from top to bottom."
-2. "What does the empty state look like? (nothing loaded yet / no results / error)"
-3. "Any animations or transitions you're picturing? Or keep it static?"
-4. "On mobile — stacks vertically or anything different?"
-5. "Any edge cases? (very long text, images that fail to load, loading states)"
-
-### API/Backend phases — ask about:
-1. "What's the intended consumer? Internal frontend / external developers / both?"
-2. "For errors — do you want detailed error objects with field-level info or simple messages?"
-3. "Rate limiting needed on any of these endpoints?"
-4. "Any background processing involved, or all synchronous?"
-5. "Versioning approach? /v1/ prefix or header-based?"
-
-### Data/Database phases — ask about:
-1. "What's the expected data volume? Thousands / millions / billions of rows?"
-2. "Any fields that need full-text search vs. exact match?"
-3. "Soft delete or hard delete for user-facing records?"
-4. "Any fields that change frequently vs. infrequently? (affects indexing strategy)"
-5. "Data retention requirements? When can records be deleted?"
-
-### Integration phases — ask about:
-1. "Have you already chosen the third-party service / API? If so, which? (I will query Context7 for current docs if available)"
-2. "What should happen if the third-party service is down? Queue / fail / fallback?"
-3. "Webhooks or polling for receiving updates?"
-4. "Any rate limits you know about on their end?"
-5. "Testing approach? Do they have a sandbox environment?"
-
-## --batch mode
-If `--batch` flag is provided: group related questions and present them together.
-Appropriate when the user wants faster intake and is familiar with MindForge.
-
-Example batch:
-```
-Visual decisions for Phase 2:
-  1. Layout: card grid / table / list?
-  2. Empty state: illustration / simple message / hide section?
-  3. Loading: skeleton / spinner / none?
-  4. Mobile: same layout / stacked / hidden?
-Answer 1-4:
-```
-
-## --auto mode
-If `--auto` flag is provided: skip the discussion entirely.
-The planner will make reasonable defaults for all decisions.
-Use when: the phase is straightforward and you trust the planner's judgment.
-Warn clearly: "Skipping discussion. Planner will make implementation decisions.
-              Results may not match your vision exactly. Proceeding without
-              explicit decisions can create rework later."
-
-## Step 3 — Write CONTEXT.md
-
-After discussion, write `.planning/phases/[N]/CONTEXT.md`:
-
-```markdown
-# Phase [N] Implementation Context
-# Captured: [ISO-8601]
-# Discussion mode: [interactive / batch / auto]
-
-## Phase description
-[From ROADMAP.md]
-
-## Implementation decisions (captured from discussion)
-
-### [Domain: Visual / API / Data / Integration / etc.]
-
-**Decision:** [What was decided]
-**Rationale:** [Why — from user's words]
-**Implications for planning:**
-  - [What the planner should do because of this decision]
-  - [Specific library or pattern to use]
-  - [What to avoid]
-
-[Repeat for each significant decision]
-
-## Open questions (unresolved during discussion)
-- [Question 1]: [Status — decide during planning / decide during execution]
-
-## User's explicit preferences
-[Verbatim or near-verbatim quotes from the discussion that capture specific intent]
-
-## Defaults accepted (decisions the user deferred to the planner)
-- [Area]: planner's choice
-```
-
-## Step 4 — Confirm and guide
-
-Show the user a summary of what was captured:
-
-"✅ Phase [N] discussion complete. [N] decisions captured.
-
-  Key decisions:
-  - [Decision 1 summary]
-  - [Decision 2 summary]
-  - [Decision 3 summary]
-
-  See full context: .planning/phases/[N]/CONTEXT.md
-
-  Next step: Run /mindforge:plan-phase [N] to create implementation plans
-  using these decisions."

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge:do.md

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Smart natural language dispatcher to route intent to the right MindForge command
----
-<objective>
-Provide a high-level, natural language interface for users to interact with MindForge without needing to remember specific command names. Routes user intent to the most appropriate internal command.
-</objective>
-
-<execution_context>
-.claude/commands/mindforge/do.md
-</execution_context>
-
-<context>
-Arguments: $ARGUMENTS (The user's intent in plain English)
-Knowledge: Must be aware of all available `.claude/commands/mindforge/*.md` definitions.
-</context>
-
-<process>
-1. **Analyze input**: Parse the user's natural language request.
-2. **Match command**: Compare the intent against the descriptions and objectives of all known MindForge commands.
-3. **Execute match**:
-    - If a clear match is found, immediately pivot to that command's logic.
-    - If multiple matches are possible, ask the user for clarification.
-    - If no match is found, suggest the most relevant command or offer `/mindforge:help`.
-4. **Learn (Optional)**: If the user confirms a routing was correct, record the mapping for future intent resolution.
-</process>