mindforge-cc 8.2.0 → 9.0.0

package/.mindforge/mirrors/mirror-sre-776a1cf9/.agent/workflows/mindforge-discuss-phase-assumptions.md

@@ -1,645 +0,0 @@
-<purpose>
-Extract implementation decisions that downstream agents need — using codebase-first analysis
-and assumption surfacing instead of interview-style questioning.
-
-You are a thinking partner, not an interviewer. Analyze the codebase deeply, surface what you
-believe based on evidence, and ask the user only to correct what's wrong.
-</purpose>
-
-<downstream_awareness>
-**CONTEXT.md feeds into:**
-
-1. **mindforge-phase-researcher** — Reads CONTEXT.md to know WHAT to research
-2. **mindforge-planner** — Reads CONTEXT.md to know WHAT decisions are locked
-
-**Your job:** Capture decisions clearly enough that downstream agents can act on them
-without asking the user again. Output is identical to discuss mode — same CONTEXT.md format.
-</downstream_awareness>
-
-<philosophy>
-**Assumptions mode philosophy:**
-
-The user is a visionary, not a codebase archaeologist. They need enough context to evaluate
-whether your assumptions match their intent — not to answer questions you could figure out
-by reading the code.
-
-- Read the codebase FIRST, form opinions SECOND, ask ONLY about what's genuinely unclear
-- Every assumption must cite evidence (file paths, patterns found)
-- Every assumption must state consequences if wrong
-- Minimize user interactions: ~2-4 corrections vs ~15-20 questions
-</philosophy>
-
-<scope_guardrail>
-**CRITICAL: No scope creep.**
-
-The phase boundary comes from ROADMAP.md and is FIXED. Discussion clarifies HOW to implement
-what's scoped, never WHETHER to add new capabilities.
-
-When user suggests scope creep:
-"[Feature X] would be a new capability — that's its own phase.
-Want me to note it for the roadmap backlog? For now, let's focus on [phase domain]."
-
-Capture the idea in "Deferred Ideas". Don't lose it, don't act on it.
-</scope_guardrail>
-
-<answer_validation>
-**IMPORTANT: Answer validation** — After every AskUserQuestion call, check if the response
-is empty or whitespace-only. If so:
-1. Retry the question once with the same parameters
-2. If still empty, present the options as a plain-text numbered list
-
-**Text mode (`workflow.text_mode: true` in config or `--text` flag):**
-When text mode is active, do not use AskUserQuestion at all. Present every question as a
-plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number.
-</answer_validation>
-
-<process>
-
-<step name="initialize" priority="first">
-Phase number from argument (required).
-
-```bash
-INIT=$(node ".agent/bin/mindforge-tools.cjs" init phase-op "${PHASE}")
-if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi
-```
-
-Parse JSON for: `commit_docs`, `phase_found`, `phase_dir`, `phase_number`, `phase_name`,
-`phase_slug`, `padded_phase`, `has_research`, `has_context`, `has_plans`, `has_verification`,
-`plan_count`, `roadmap_exists`, `planning_exists`.
-
-**If `phase_found` is false:**
-```
-Phase [X] not found in roadmap.
-
-Use /mindforge-progress to see available phases.
-```
-Exit workflow.
-
-**If `phase_found` is true:** Continue to check_existing.
-
-**Auto mode** — If `--auto` is present in ARGUMENTS:
-- In `check_existing`: auto-select "Update it" (if context exists) or continue without prompting
-- In `present_assumptions`: skip confirmation gate, proceed directly to write CONTEXT.md
-- In `correct_assumptions`: auto-select recommended option for each correction
-- Log each auto-selected choice inline
-- After completion, auto-advance to plan-phase
-</step>
-
-<step name="check_existing">
-Check if CONTEXT.md already exists using `has_context` from init.
-
-```bash
-ls ${phase_dir}/*-CONTEXT.md 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-**If exists:**
-
-**If `--auto`:** Auto-select "Update it". Log: `[auto] Context exists — updating with assumption-based analysis.`
-
-**Otherwise:** Use AskUserQuestion:
-- header: "Context"
-- question: "Phase [X] already has context. What do you want to do?"
-- options:
-  - "Update it" — Re-analyze codebase and refresh assumptions
-  - "View it" — Show me what's there
-  - "Skip" — Use existing context as-is
-
-If "Update": Load existing, continue to load_prior_context
-If "View": Display CONTEXT.md, then offer update/skip
-If "Skip": Exit workflow
-
-**If doesn't exist:**
-
-Check `has_plans` and `plan_count` from init. **If `has_plans` is true:**
-
-**If `--auto`:** Auto-select "Continue and replan after". Log: `[auto] Plans exist — continuing with assumption analysis, will replan after.`
-
-**Otherwise:** Use AskUserQuestion:
-- header: "Plans exist"
-- question: "Phase [X] already has {plan_count} plan(s) created without user context. Your decisions here won't affect existing plans unless you replan."
-- options:
-  - "Continue and replan after"
-  - "View existing plans"
-  - "Cancel"
-
-If "Continue and replan after": Continue to load_prior_context.
-If "View existing plans": Display plan files, then offer "Continue" / "Cancel".
-If "Cancel": Exit workflow.
-
-**If `has_plans` is false:** Continue to load_prior_context.
-</step>
-
-<step name="load_prior_context">
-Read project-level and prior phase context to avoid re-asking decided questions.
-
-**Step 1: Read project-level files**
-```bash
-cat .planning/PROJECT.md 2>/dev/null
-cat .planning/REQUIREMENTS.md 2>/dev/null
-cat .planning/STATE.md 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-Extract from these:
-- **PROJECT.md** — Vision, principles, non-negotiables, user preferences
-- **REQUIREMENTS.md** — Acceptance criteria, constraints
-- **STATE.md** — Current progress, any flags
-
-**Step 2: Read all prior CONTEXT.md files**
-```bash
-find .planning/phases -name "*-CONTEXT.md" 2>/dev/null | sort
-```
-
-For each CONTEXT.md where phase number < current phase:
-- Read the `<decisions>` section — these are locked preferences
-- Read `<specifics>` — particular references or "I want it like X" moments
-- Note patterns (e.g., "user consistently prefers minimal UI")
-
-**Step 3: Build internal `<prior_decisions>` context**
-
-Structure the extracted information for use in assumption generation.
-
-**If no prior context exists:** Continue without — expected for early phases.
-</step>
-
-<step name="cross_reference_todos">
-Check if any pending todos are relevant to this phase's scope.
-
-```bash
-TODO_MATCHES=$(node ".agent/bin/mindforge-tools.cjs" todo match-phase "${PHASE_NUMBER}")
-```
-
-Parse JSON for: `todo_count`, `matches[]`.
-
-**If `todo_count` is 0:** Skip silently.
-
-**If matches found:** Present matched todos, use AskUserQuestion (multiSelect) to fold relevant ones into scope.
-
-**For selected (folded) todos:** Store as `<folded_todos>` for CONTEXT.md `<decisions>` section.
-**For unselected:** Store as `<reviewed_todos>` for CONTEXT.md `<deferred>` section.
-
-**Auto mode (`--auto`):** Fold all todos with score >= 0.4 automatically. Log the selection.
-</step>
-
-<step name="scout_codebase">
-Lightweight scan of existing code to inform assumption generation.
-
-**Step 1: Check for existing codebase maps**
-```bash
-ls .planning/codebase/*.md 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-**If codebase maps exist:** Read relevant ones (CONVENTIONS.md, STRUCTURE.md, STACK.md). Extract reusable components, patterns, integration points. Skip to Step 3.
-
-**Step 2: If no codebase maps, do targeted grep**
-
-Extract key terms from phase goal, search for related files.
-
-```bash
-grep -rl "{term1}\|{term2}" src/ app/ --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" 2>/dev/null | head -10
-```
-
-Read the 3-5 most relevant files.
-
-**Step 3: Build internal `<codebase_context>`**
-
-Identify reusable assets, established patterns, integration points, and creative options. Store internally for use in deep_codebase_analysis.
-</step>
-
-<step name="deep_codebase_analysis">
-Spawn a `mindforge-assumptions-analyzer` agent to deeply analyze the codebase for this phase. This
-keeps raw file contents out of the main context window, protecting token budget.
-
-**Resolve calibration tier (if USER-PROFILE.md exists):**
-
-```bash
-PROFILE_PATH=".agent/mindforge/USER-PROFILE.md"
-```
-
-If file exists at PROFILE_PATH:
-- Priority 1: Read config.json > preferences.vendor_philosophy (project-level override)
-- Priority 2: Read USER-PROFILE.md Vendor Choices/Philosophy rating (global)
-- Priority 3: Default to "standard"
-
-Map to calibration tier:
-- conservative OR thorough-evaluator → full_maturity (more alternatives, detailed evidence)
-- opinionated → minimal_decisive (fewer alternatives, decisive recommendations)
-- pragmatic-fast OR any other value → standard
-
-If no USER-PROFILE.md: calibration_tier = "standard"
-
-**Spawn Explore subagent:**
-
-```
-Task(subagent_type="mindforge-assumptions-analyzer", prompt="""
-Analyze the codebase for Phase {PHASE}: {phase_name}.
-
-Phase goal: {roadmap_description}
-Prior decisions: {prior_decisions_summary}
-Codebase scout hints: {codebase_context_summary}
-Calibration: {calibration_tier}
-
-Your job:
-1. Read ROADMAP.md phase {PHASE} description
-2. Read any prior CONTEXT.md files from earlier phases
-3. Glob/Grep for files related to: {phase_relevant_terms}
-4. Read 5-15 most relevant source files
-5. Return structured assumptions
-
-## Output Format
-
-Return EXACTLY this structure:
-
-## Assumptions
-
-### [Area Name] (e.g., "Technical Approach")
-- **Assumption:** [Decision statement]
-  - **Why this way:** [Evidence from codebase — cite file paths]
-  - **If wrong:** [Concrete consequence of this being wrong]
-  - **Confidence:** Confident | Likely | Unclear
-
-(3-5 areas, calibrated by tier:
-- full_maturity: 3-5 areas, 2-3 alternatives per Likely/Unclear item
-- standard: 3-4 areas, 2 alternatives per Likely/Unclear item
-- minimal_decisive: 2-3 areas, decisive single recommendation per item)
-
-## Needs External Research
-[Topics where codebase alone is insufficient — library version compatibility,
-ecosystem best practices, etc. Leave empty if codebase provides enough evidence.]
-""")
-```
-
-Parse the subagent's response. Extract:
-- `assumptions[]` — each with area, statement, evidence, consequence, confidence
-- `needs_research[]` — topics requiring external research (may be empty)
-
-**Initialize canonical refs accumulator:**
-- Source 1: Copy `Canonical refs:` from ROADMAP.md for this phase, expand to full paths
-- Source 2: Check REQUIREMENTS.md and PROJECT.md for specs/ADRs referenced
-- Source 3: Add any docs referenced in codebase scout results
-</step>
-
-<step name="external_research">
-**Skip if:** `needs_research` from deep_codebase_analysis is empty.
-
-If research topics were flagged, spawn a general-purpose research agent:
-
-```
-Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", prompt="""
-Research the following topics for Phase {PHASE}: {phase_name}.
-
-Topics needing research:
-{needs_research_content}
-
-For each topic, return:
-- **Finding:** [What you learned]
-- **Source:** [URL or library docs reference]
-- **Confidence impact:** [Which assumption this resolves and to what confidence level]
-
-Use Context7 (resolve-library-id then query-docs) for library-specific questions.
-Use WebSearch for ecosystem/best-practice questions.
-""")
-```
-
-Merge findings back into assumptions:
-- Update confidence levels where research resolves ambiguity
-- Add source attribution to affected assumptions
-- Store research findings for DISCUSSION-LOG.md
-
-**If no gaps flagged:** Skip entirely. Most phases will skip this step.
-</step>
-
-<step name="present_assumptions">
-Display all assumptions grouped by area with confidence badges.
-
-**Format for display:**
-
-```
-## Phase {PHASE}: {phase_name} — Assumptions
-
-Based on codebase analysis, here's what I'd go with:
-
-### {Area Name}
-{Confidence badge} **{Assumption statement}**
-↳ Evidence: {file paths cited}
-↳ If wrong: {consequence}
-
-### {Area Name 2}
-...
-
-[If external research was done:]
-### External Research Applied
-- {Topic}: {Finding} (Source: {URL})
-```
-
-**If `--auto`:**
-- If all assumptions are Confident or Likely: log assumptions, skip to write_context.
-  Log: `[auto] All assumptions Confident/Likely — proceeding to context capture.`
-- If any assumptions are Unclear: log a warning, auto-select recommended alternative for
-  each Unclear item. Log: `[auto] {N} Unclear assumptions auto-resolved with recommended defaults.`
-  Proceed to write_context.
-
-**Otherwise:** Use AskUserQuestion:
-- header: "Assumptions"
-- question: "These all look right?"
-- options:
-  - "Yes, proceed" — Write CONTEXT.md with these assumptions as decisions
-  - "Let me correct some" — Select which assumptions to change
-
-**If "Yes, proceed":** Skip to write_context.
-**If "Let me correct some":** Continue to correct_assumptions.
-</step>
-
-<step name="correct_assumptions">
-The assumptions are already displayed above from present_assumptions.
-
-Present a multiSelect where each option's label is the assumption statement and description
-is the "If wrong" consequence:
-
-Use AskUserQuestion (multiSelect):
-- header: "Corrections"
-- question: "Which assumptions need correcting?"
-- options: [one per assumption, label = assumption statement, description = "If wrong: {consequence}"]
-
-For each selected correction, ask ONE focused question:
-
-Use AskUserQuestion:
-- header: "{Area Name}"
-- question: "What should we do instead for: {assumption statement}?"
-- options: [2-3 concrete alternatives describing user-visible outcomes, recommended option first]
-
-Record each correction:
-- Original assumption
-- User's chosen alternative
-- Reason (if provided via "Other" free text)
-
-After all corrections processed, continue to write_context with updated assumptions.
-
-**Auto mode:** Should not reach this step (--auto skips from present_assumptions).
-</step>
-
-<step name="write_context">
-Create phase directory if needed. Write CONTEXT.md using the standard 6-section format.
-
-**File:** `${phase_dir}/${padded_phase}-CONTEXT.md`
-
-Map assumptions to CONTEXT.md sections:
-- Assumptions → `<decisions>` (each assumption becomes a locked decision: D-01, D-02, etc.)
-- Corrections → override the original assumption in `<decisions>`
-- Areas where all assumptions were Confident → marked as locked decisions
-- Areas with corrections → include user's chosen alternative as the decision
-- Folded todos → included in `<decisions>` under "### Folded Todos"
-
-```markdown
-# Phase {PHASE}: {phase_name} - Context
-
-**Gathered:** {date} (assumptions mode)
-**Status:** Ready for planning
-
-<domain>
-## Phase Boundary
-
-{Domain boundary from ROADMAP.md — clear statement of scope anchor}
-</domain>
-
-<decisions>
-## Implementation Decisions
-
-### {Area Name 1}
-- **D-01:** {Decision — from assumption or correction}
-- **D-02:** {Decision}
-
-### {Area Name 2}
-- **D-03:** {Decision}
-
-### the agent's Discretion
-{Any assumptions where the user confirmed "you decide" or left as-is with Likely confidence}
-
-### Folded Todos
-{If any todos were folded into scope}
-</decisions>
-
-<canonical_refs>
-## Canonical References
-
-**Downstream agents MUST read these before planning or implementing.**
-
-{Accumulated canonical refs from analyze step — full relative paths}
-
-[If no external specs: "No external specs — requirements fully captured in decisions above"]
-</canonical_refs>
-
-<code_context>
-## Existing Code Insights
-
-### Reusable Assets
-{From codebase scout + Explore subagent findings}
-
-### Established Patterns
-{Patterns that constrain/enable this phase}
-
-### Integration Points
-{Where new code connects to existing system}
-</code_context>
-
-<specifics>
-## Specific Ideas
-
-{Any particular references from corrections or user input}
-
-[If none: "No specific requirements — open to standard approaches"]
-</specifics>
-
-<deferred>
-## Deferred Ideas
-
-{Ideas mentioned during corrections that are out of scope}
-
-### Reviewed Todos (not folded)
-{Todos reviewed but not folded — with reason}
-
-[If none: "None — analysis stayed within phase scope"]
-</deferred>
-```
-
-Write file.
-</step>
-
-<step name="write_discussion_log">
-Write audit trail of assumptions and corrections.
-
-**File:** `${phase_dir}/${padded_phase}-DISCUSSION-LOG.md`
-
-```markdown
-# Phase {PHASE}: {phase_name} - Discussion Log (Assumptions Mode)
-
-> **Audit trail only.** Do not use as input to planning, research, or execution agents.
-> Decisions captured in CONTEXT.md — this log preserves the analysis.
-
-**Date:** {ISO date}
-**Phase:** {padded_phase}-{phase_name}
-**Mode:** assumptions
-**Areas analyzed:** {comma-separated area names}
-
-## Assumptions Presented
-
-### {Area Name}
-| Assumption | Confidence | Evidence |
-|------------|-----------|----------|
-| {Statement} | {Confident/Likely/Unclear} | {file paths} |
-
-{Repeat for each area}
-
-## Corrections Made
-
-{If corrections were made:}
-
-### {Area Name}
-- **Original assumption:** {what the agent assumed}
-- **User correction:** {what the user chose instead}
-- **Reason:** {user's rationale, if provided}
-
-{If no corrections: "No corrections — all assumptions confirmed."}
-
-## Auto-Resolved
-
-{If --auto and Unclear items existed:}
-- {Assumption}: auto-selected {recommended option}
-
-{If not applicable: omit this section}
-
-## External Research
-
-{If research was performed:}
-- {Topic}: {Finding} (Source: {URL})
-
-{If no research: omit this section}
-```
-
-Write file.
-</step>
-
-<step name="git_commit">
-Commit phase context and discussion log:
-
-```bash
-node ".agent/bin/mindforge-tools.cjs" commit "docs(${padded_phase}): capture phase context (assumptions mode)" --files "${phase_dir}/${padded_phase}-CONTEXT.md" "${phase_dir}/${padded_phase}-DISCUSSION-LOG.md"
-```
-
-Confirm: "Committed: docs(${padded_phase}): capture phase context (assumptions mode)"
-</step>
-
-<step name="update_state">
-Update STATE.md with session info:
-
-```bash
-node ".agent/bin/mindforge-tools.cjs" state record-session \
-  --stopped-at "Phase ${PHASE} context gathered (assumptions mode)" \
-  --resume-file "${phase_dir}/${padded_phase}-CONTEXT.md"
-```
-
-Commit STATE.md:
-
-```bash
-node ".agent/bin/mindforge-tools.cjs" commit "docs(state): record phase ${PHASE} context session" --files .planning/STATE.md
-```
-</step>
-
-<step name="confirm_creation">
-Present summary and next steps:
-
-```
-Created: .planning/phases/${PADDED_PHASE}-${SLUG}/${PADDED_PHASE}-CONTEXT.md
-
-## Decisions Captured (Assumptions Mode)
-
-### {Area Name}
-- {Key decision} (from assumption / corrected)
-
-{Repeat per area}
-
-[If corrections were made:]
-## Corrections Applied
-- {Area}: {original} → {corrected}
-
-[If deferred ideas exist:]
-## Noted for Later
-- {Deferred idea} — future phase
-
----
-
-## ▶ Next Up
-
-**Phase ${PHASE}: {phase_name}** — {Goal from ROADMAP.md}
-
-`/mindforge-plan-phase ${PHASE}`
-
-<sub>`/clear` first → fresh context window</sub>
-
----
-
-**Also available:**
-- `/mindforge-plan-phase ${PHASE} --skip-research` — plan without research
-- `/mindforge-ui-phase ${PHASE}` — generate UI design contract (if frontend work)
-- Review/edit CONTEXT.md before continuing
-
----
-```
-</step>
-
-<step name="auto_advance">
-Check for auto-advance trigger:
-
-1. Parse `--auto` flag from $ARGUMENTS
-2. Sync chain flag:
-   ```bash
-   if [[ ! "$ARGUMENTS" =~ --auto ]]; then
-     node ".agent/bin/mindforge-tools.cjs" config-set workflow._auto_chain_active false 2>/dev/null
-   fi
-   ```
-3. Read chain flag and user preference:
-   ```bash
-   AUTO_CHAIN=$(node ".agent/bin/mindforge-tools.cjs" config-get workflow._auto_chain_active 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
-   AUTO_CFG=$(node ".agent/bin/mindforge-tools.cjs" config-get workflow.auto_advance 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
-   ```
-
-**If `--auto` flag present AND `AUTO_CHAIN` is not true:**
-```bash
-node ".agent/bin/mindforge-tools.cjs" config-set workflow._auto_chain_active true
-```
-
-**If `--auto` flag present OR `AUTO_CHAIN` is true OR `AUTO_CFG` is true:**
-
-Display banner:
-```
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
- MindForge ► AUTO-ADVANCING TO PLAN
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-
-Context captured (assumptions mode). Launching plan-phase...
-```
-
-Launch: `Skill(skill="mindforge-plan-phase", args="${PHASE} --auto")`
-
-Handle return: PHASE COMPLETE / PLANNING COMPLETE / INCONCLUSIVE / GAPS FOUND
-(identical handling to discuss-phase.md auto_advance step)
-
-**If neither `--auto` nor config enabled:**
-Route to confirm_creation step.
-</step>
-
-</process>
-
-<success_criteria>
-- Phase validated against roadmap
-- Prior context loaded (no re-asking decided questions)
-- Codebase deeply analyzed via Explore subagent (5-15 files read)
-- Assumptions surfaced with evidence and confidence levels
-- User confirmed or corrected assumptions (~2-4 interactions max)
-- Scope creep redirected to deferred ideas
-- CONTEXT.md captures actual decisions (identical format to discuss mode)
-- CONTEXT.md includes canonical_refs with full file paths (MANDATORY)
-- CONTEXT.md includes code_context from codebase analysis
-- DISCUSSION-LOG.md records assumptions and corrections as audit trail
-- STATE.md updated with session info
-- User knows next steps
-</success_criteria>