maestro-flow 0.5.31 → 0.5.33

package/.agents/skills/scholar-anti-ai-writing/phases/01-detect-score.md

@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+# Phase 1: Detect & Score
+
+## Objective
+
+Scan the input text for AI writing patterns across four categories and generate an initial quality score on five dimensions. This phase produces a pattern report that drives Phase 2 rewrites.
+
+## Execution
+
+### Step 1.1: Load Input
+
+1. Accept input as file path (.tex, .md) or pasted text
+2. Read full content into working memory
+3. Detect primary language:
+   - **English**: ASCII-dominant, Latin script
+   - **Chinese**: CJK character majority
+   - **Mixed**: Both scripts present -- note ratio and mark bilingual sections
+4. If LaTeX (.tex): parse preamble separately, focus scanning on body content only (between `\begin{document}` and `\end{document}`)
+
+### Step 1.2: Pattern Scan
+
+Scan text against reference pattern files. For each match, record: passage text, line/paragraph location, pattern ID, category, and severity (high/medium/low).
+
+#### Category A: Content Patterns
+
+Reference: `references/patterns-english.md` sections 1-6, `references/patterns-chinese.md` sections 1-6
+
+| ID | Pattern | Severity |
+|----|---------|----------|
+| C1 | Undue emphasis on significance | High |
+| C2 | Undue emphasis on notability | Medium |
+| C3 | Superficial -ing analyses | High |
+| C4 | Promotional language | High |
+| C5 | Vague attributions | Medium |
+| C6 | Formulaic challenges sections | Medium |
+
+#### Category B: Language Patterns
+
+Reference: `references/patterns-english.md` sections 7-12, `references/patterns-chinese.md` sections 7-12
+
+| ID | Pattern | Severity |
+|----|---------|----------|
+| L1 | AI vocabulary (Additionally, crucial, delve, enhance, landscape, etc.) | High |
+| L2 | Copula avoidance (serves as, stands as) | Medium |
+| L3 | Negative parallelisms | Medium |
+| L4 | Rule of three | Low |
+| L5 | Elegant variation (synonym cycling) | Medium |
+| L6 | False ranges | Low |
+
+#### Category C: Style Patterns
+
+Reference: `references/patterns-english.md` sections 13-15, `references/patterns-chinese.md` sections 13-15
+
+| ID | Pattern | Severity |
+|----|---------|----------|
+| S1 | Em dash overuse | Medium |
+| S2 | Boldface overuse | Low |
+| S3 | Inline-header vertical lists | Medium |
+
+#### Category D: Communication & Filler Patterns
+
+Reference: `references/patterns-english.md` sections 16-20, `references/patterns-chinese.md` sections 16-20
+
+| ID | Pattern | Severity |
+|----|---------|----------|
+| F1 | Collaborative artifacts (I hope this helps, Let me know) | High |
+| F2 | Knowledge cutoff disclaimers | High |
+| F3 | Filler phrases | Medium |
+| F4 | Excessive hedging | Medium |
+| F5 | Generic positive conclusions | Medium |
+
+### Step 1.3: Score
+
+Rate the text on a 1-10 scale for each dimension (10 = best). Score per section if the text has clear sections, then compute overall scores.
+
+| Dimension | 1 (worst) | 10 (best) |
+|-----------|-----------|-----------|
+| **Directness** | Every point announced before stated; throat-clearing openers everywhere | Claims made directly without pre-announcement or softening |
+| **Rhythm** | Every sentence same length and structure; metronomic cadence | Varied sentence lengths; short punchy lines mixed with longer ones |
+| **Trust** | Reader hand-held through every inference; over-explained | Facts stated; reader trusted to draw conclusions |
+| **Authenticity** | Reads like template-generated content; no human voice | Sounds like a specific person wrote it; has opinions and texture |
+| **Density** | Significant cuttable filler; redundant phrases throughout | Every word earns its place; nothing cuttable without losing meaning |
+
+**Scoring rules**:
+- Score each section independently first
+- Weight section scores by word count for overall score
+- Total possible = 50 (5 dimensions x 10 max)
+- Record specific passages that caused low scores as evidence
+
+## Output
+
+```
+patternReport:
+  language: <detected language>
+  sections:
+    - name: <section identifier>
+      wordCount: <n>
+      flaggedPassages:
+        - text: "<flagged passage>"
+          location: <line or paragraph ref>
+          patternId: <C1-C6, L1-L6, S1-S3, F1-F5>
+          category: <content|language|style|filler>
+          severity: <high|medium|low>
+          suggestion: "<brief fix direction>"
+      scores:
+        directness: <1-10>
+        rhythm: <1-10>
+        trust: <1-10>
+        authenticity: <1-10>
+        density: <1-10>
+        total: <5-50>
+  overall:
+    totalPatterns: <count>
+    bySeverity: { high: <n>, medium: <n>, low: <n> }
+    byCategory: { content: <n>, language: <n>, style: <n>, filler: <n> }
+    scores:
+      directness: <weighted avg>
+      rhythm: <weighted avg>
+      trust: <weighted avg>
+      authenticity: <weighted avg>
+      density: <weighted avg>
+      total: <weighted avg>
+```
+
+## Next Phase
+
+Pass `patternReport` to **Phase 2: Rewrite & Polish** for targeted corrections.

package/.agents/skills/scholar-anti-ai-writing/phases/02-rewrite-polish.md

@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
+# Phase 2: Rewrite & Polish
+
+## Objective
+
+Apply targeted rewrites to all flagged passages from Phase 1. Remove AI patterns while preserving meaning, then inject human voice and personality. This is the critical transformation phase.
+
+<!-- COMPACT SENTINEL: Do not skip or abbreviate any step in this phase. Every flagged passage must be individually addressed. Bulk "apply all" shortcuts are not permitted. -->
+
+## Execution
+
+### Step 2.1: Apply Core Rules
+
+For each flagged passage in `patternReport.sections[].flaggedPassages[]`, apply these rules in order:
+
+**Rule 1: Cut filler phrases**
+- Remove throat-clearing openers ("It is important to note that", "It is worth mentioning that")
+- Remove emphasis crutches ("significantly", "notably", "remarkably")
+- Remove hedging stacks ("could potentially possibly")
+- If the sentence still makes sense without the phrase, cut it
+
+**Rule 2: Break formulaic structures**
+- Avoid binary contrasts ("not just X, but also Y" -> state Y directly)
+- Avoid dramatic fragmentation ("It's not merely a song. It's a statement." -> state the point once)
+- Collapse "despite X, Y continues to Z" into direct statements
+- Break rule-of-three lists into prose or keep only the most relevant items
+
+**Rule 3: Vary rhythm**
+- If three consecutive sentences have similar length (within 20%), restructure
+- Mix short declarative sentences (5-10 words) with longer compound ones
+- Vary paragraph endings -- not every paragraph should end with a broad statement
+- Avoid starting consecutive sentences with the same word or structure
+
+**Rule 4: Trust readers**
+- State facts directly without softening ("The policy failed" not "It could be argued that the policy may have fallen short")
+- Remove "signaling", "highlighting", "underscoring" -- these tell readers what to think
+- Cut "This is important because..." -- if it's important, the reader will see why
+- Remove post-hoc justifications that explain why you just told the reader something
+
+**Rule 5: Cut quotables**
+- If a sentence sounds like it belongs on a motivational poster, rewrite it
+- "The future looks bright" -> specific next steps
+- "This represents a paradigm shift" -> what actually changed
+- If you could imagine it in a press release, make it more specific
+
+### Step 2.2: Language-Specific Rewrites
+
+#### English Fixes
+
+| AI Pattern | Fix |
+|------------|-----|
+| "serves as" / "stands as" | Use "is" |
+| "boasts" / "features" / "offers" | Use "has" or "includes" |
+| "Additionally" | Use "Also" or restructure to eliminate |
+| "crucial" / "pivotal" / "vital" | Remove or use "important" if truly needed |
+| "delve into" | Use "examine" or "look at" |
+| "enhance" | Use "improve" or be specific about what changes |
+| "landscape" (abstract) | Name the actual domain or remove |
+| "tapestry" (abstract) | Describe the actual mixture |
+| "testament to" | State the evidence directly |
+| "vibrant" | Describe the actual quality |
+| "nestled in" | Use "in" or "located in" |
+| "garnered" | Use "received" or "got" |
+| Em dashes (--) | Replace with commas, parentheses, or restructure into separate sentences |
+| "It's not just X; it's Y" | State Y directly |
+| "From X to Y" (false range) | List the actual topics covered |
+
+#### Chinese Fixes
+
+| AI Pattern | Fix |
+|------------|-----|
+| "此外" (Additionally) | "也" / "还" or restructure |
+| "至关重要" (crucial) | "重要" or remove if context is clear |
+| "深入探讨" (delve into) | "讨论" / "分析" |
+| "充满活力" (vibrant) | Describe the actual quality |
+| "格局" / "landscape" (abstract) | Name the specific domain |
+| "作为……的证明/体现" | State the evidence directly |
+| "值得注意的是" | Remove, state the fact directly |
+| "不可磨灭的印记" | Be specific about the actual impact |
+| "为……奠定基础" | State what was built and when |
+| "坐落于" (nestled in) | "位于" or "在" |
+| "令人叹为观止" (breathtaking) | Describe what is actually notable |
+| "持久的" / "永恒的" | Remove or state the time span |
+| "凸显/彰显了" | State the fact; let the reader judge significance |
+
+### CHECKPOINT
+
+Before proceeding to Step 2.3, verify:
+- [ ] Every flagged passage from Phase 1 has been addressed
+- [ ] No new AI patterns were introduced during rewriting
+- [ ] LaTeX commands remain intact (run Step 2.4 check)
+- [ ] Core meaning is preserved in every rewrite
+
+If any check fails, return to the failing step before continuing.
+
+### Step 2.3: Add Voice & Soul
+
+This step is critical. Removing AI patterns is necessary but not sufficient. Text that has only had patterns removed often reads as flat and lifeless. The goal is to add humanity.
+
+**Have opinions**
+- React to facts, don't just report them
+- State what is surprising, unusual, or counter-intuitive
+
+| Before (flat) | After (with voice) |
+|---|---|
+| "The company grew 200% in two years." | "The company tripled in two years, an unusual pace even for the sector." |
+| "This approach achieves state-of-the-art results on three benchmarks." | "This approach tops three benchmarks — though the margins on GLUE are razor-thin." |
+| "该方法在三个数据集上优于基线。" | "该方法在三个数据集上均优于基线，其中在小样本场景下的提升尤为明显。" |
+
+**Vary rhythm deliberately**
+- After a long explanatory sentence, follow with something short
+- Let paragraph rhythm reflect content — tense moments get shorter sentences
+
+| Before (metronomic) | After (varied) |
+|---|---|
+| "The algorithm processes each node by traversing the adjacency list. It compares weights at each step. It then selects the minimum-cost edge." | "The algorithm processes each node by traversing the adjacency list, comparing weights, and selecting the minimum-cost edge at each step. This is slow." |
+| "我们首先进行数据预处理。然后我们训练模型。最后我们评估性能。" | "数据预处理后直接进入训练。评估结果出人意料。" |
+
+**Acknowledge complexity**
+- Real humans have mixed feelings — avoid clean narratives where everything is positive
+- It is fine to leave questions open
+
+| Before (clean narrative) | After (honest complexity) |
+|---|---|
+| "The reform improved healthcare access, demonstrating the effectiveness of the policy." | "The reform improved access but created new bottlenecks — rural clinics gained funding yet lost staff to urban hospitals." |
+| "该方法有效解决了这一长期存在的问题。" | "该方法缓解了主要瓶颈，但在极端分布偏移下仍存在退化现象。" |
+
+**Use appropriate voice**
+- In non-academic contexts: "I think", "I found", "In my experience"
+- In academic contexts: "We observe", "Our analysis suggests", "We note that"
+- Avoid passive voice when it hides the agent unnecessarily
+
+| Before (passive/hidden) | After (active/clear) |
+|---|---|
+| "It was observed that the model failed to converge." | "We found the model failed to converge when batch size exceeded 256." |
+| "实验结果表明了该方法的有效性。" | "实验结果表明该方法在低资源场景下尤为有效，但在数据充足时优势减弱。" |
+
+**For academic context specifically**
+- Maintain formal-but-natural tone
+- Precision matters more than personality
+- Voice comes through in word choice and analytical framing, not casual language
+- Signal uncertainty honestly ("This suggests..." rather than "This proves...")
+- Keep discipline-specific terminology
+
+### Step 2.4: Preserve LaTeX
+
+For .tex input, verify after all rewrites:
+
+1. All `\cite{...}` commands are intact with correct keys
+2. All `\ref{...}` and `\label{...}` pairs are preserved
+3. Math environments (`$...$`, `\[...\]`, `\begin{equation}...`) are unchanged
+4. Custom commands and macros are untouched
+5. Figure/table environments and their captions are structurally intact
+6. No LaTeX commands were accidentally modified during text rewrites
+
+**Method**: Extract all LaTeX commands from original text, compare with rewritten text, flag any differences.
+
+## Output
+
+```
+polishedText:
+  sections:
+    - name: <section identifier>
+      originalText: "<original>"
+      rewrittenText: "<rewritten>"
+      changesApplied:
+        - patternId: <id>
+          original: "<flagged passage>"
+          rewritten: "<new passage>"
+          ruleApplied: "<rule name>"
+      latexIntegrity: <pass|fail>
+  checkpointStatus: <pass|fail>
+  voiceAdded: <true|false>
+```
+
+## Next Phase
+
+Pass `polishedText` to **Phase 3: Validate & Score** for re-scoring and comparison.

package/.agents/skills/scholar-anti-ai-writing/phases/03-validate-score.md

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+# Phase 3: Validate & Score
+
+## Objective
+
+Re-score the polished text using the same five dimensions from Phase 1, compare before/after results, apply threshold checks, and generate a final report with all changes documented.
+
+## Execution
+
+### Step 3.1: Re-Score
+
+Apply the identical 5-dimension scoring rubric from Phase 1 to the polished text.
+
+| Dimension | Scoring Criteria (same as Phase 1) |
+|-----------|-----------------------------------|
+| **Directness** (1-10) | Are claims stated without pre-announcement or softening? |
+| **Rhythm** (1-10) | Are sentence lengths and structures varied? |
+| **Trust** (1-10) | Are facts stated without over-explanation? |
+| **Authenticity** (1-10) | Does the text sound like a specific person wrote it? |
+| **Density** (1-10) | Does every word earn its place? |
+
+**Scoring procedure**:
+1. Score each section independently (same sections as Phase 1)
+2. Weight section scores by word count for overall scores
+3. Record specific passages that demonstrate improvements as evidence
+4. Note any passages where scores did not improve or regressed
+
+### Step 3.2: Compare
+
+Generate a before/after comparison across all dimensions.
+
+**Score Delta Table**:
+
+```
+Dimension      | Before | After | Delta | Change
+---------------|--------|-------|-------|-------
+Directness     |   X    |   Y   |  +/-  |  +N%
+Rhythm         |   X    |   Y   |  +/-  |  +N%
+Trust          |   X    |   Y   |  +/-  |  +N%
+Authenticity   |   X    |   Y   |  +/-  |  +N%
+Density        |   X    |   Y   |  +/-  |  +N%
+---------------|--------|-------|-------|-------
+TOTAL          |  /50   |  /50  |  +/-  |  +N%
+```
+
+**Sample Passages**: Select the 3-5 passages showing the biggest improvements. For each, show:
+- Original text
+- Rewritten text
+- Which patterns were removed (pattern IDs)
+- Which dimension(s) improved most
+
+**Regression Check**: Flag any passages where a dimension score decreased. These need review -- the rewrite may have introduced new issues or lost important nuance.
+
+### Step 3.3: Threshold Check
+
+Apply threshold rules to the total score (out of 50):
+
+| Total Score | Rating | Action |
+|-------------|--------|--------|
+| >= 45 | Excellent | AI patterns effectively removed. Text reads as human-written. Proceed to final report. |
+| 35-44 | Good | Most patterns removed. Flag specific sections scoring below 7 on any dimension for optional touch-up. Proceed to final report with recommendations. |
+| < 35 | Needs Revision | Significant AI patterns remain. Identify the lowest-scoring sections and dimensions. Return to Phase 2 Step 2.1 for targeted re-polish of flagged sections only. |
+
+**Revision loop rules** (when score < 35):
+- Maximum 2 revision loops allowed
+- Each loop targets only sections scoring below 7 on any dimension
+- If score remains < 35 after 2 loops, proceed to final report with explicit warnings about remaining patterns
+- Track which sections improved across loops to avoid infinite cycling
+
+### Step 3.4: Generate Report
+
+Produce a structured final report containing all analysis results.
+
+**Report Structure**:
+
+```markdown
+# Anti-AI Writing Report
+
+## Summary
+- Input: <filename or "pasted text">, <word count>, <language>
+- Patterns found: <total> (high: <n>, medium: <n>, low: <n>)
+- Patterns fixed: <n>/<total>
+- Score improvement: <before>/50 -> <after>/50 (+<delta>)
+- Rating: <Excellent|Good|Needs Revision>
+
+## Score Comparison
+<Score delta table from Step 3.2>
+
+## Top Improvements
+<3-5 best before/after passage comparisons>
+
+## Changes Log
+For each change:
+- Location: <section, paragraph, line>
+- Pattern: <pattern ID and name>
+- Original: "<original text>"
+- Revised: "<revised text>"
+- Rule applied: <rule name from Phase 2>
+
+## Remaining Issues (if any)
+- Passages where patterns persist
+- Sections scoring below 7 on any dimension
+- Recommendations for manual review
+
+## Polished Text
+<Complete polished text, ready for use>
+```
+
+## Output
+
+```
+finalReport:
+  summary:
+    input: <filename or description>
+    wordCount: <n>
+    language: <detected language>
+    patternsFound: <total>
+    patternsFixed: <n>
+    scoreBefore: <n>/50
+    scoreAfter: <n>/50
+    rating: <Excellent|Good|Needs Revision>
+  scores:
+    before: { directness, rhythm, trust, authenticity, density, total }
+    after: { directness, rhythm, trust, authenticity, density, total }
+    delta: { directness, rhythm, trust, authenticity, density, total }
+  topImprovements: [{ original, revised, patternsRemoved, dimensionsImproved }]
+  changesLog: [{ location, patternId, original, revised, ruleApplied }]
+  remainingIssues: [{ location, description, recommendation }]
+  polishedText: "<complete final text>"
+  revisionLoops: <0|1|2>
+```
+
+## Next Phase
+
+None -- this is the final phase. Deliver `finalReport` and `polishedText` to the user.

package/.agents/skills/scholar-anti-ai-writing/references/patterns-chinese.md

@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+# 中文 AI 写作模式 - 完整参考
+
+Complete Chinese AI Writing Patterns Reference.
+
+## 内容模式 (CONTENT PATTERNS)
+
+### 1. 过度强调意义、遗产和更广泛的趋势
+
+**需要注意的词汇**：作为/充当、标志着/见证、是……的体现/证明/提醒、极其重要的/重要的/至关重要的/核心的/关键性的作用/时刻、凸显/强调/彰显了其重要性/意义、反映了更广泛的、象征着其持续的/永恒的/持久的、为……做出贡献、为……奠定基础、标志着/塑造着、代表/标志着一个转变、关键转折点、不断演变的格局、焦点、不可磨灭的印记、深深植根于
+
+**改写前**：
+> 加泰罗尼亚统计局于 1989 年正式成立，标志着西班牙区域统计演变史上的关键时刻。这一举措是西班牙全国范围内更广泛运动的一部分，旨在分散行政职能并加强区域治理。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 加泰罗尼亚统计局成立于 1989 年，负责独立于西班牙国家统计局收集和发布区域统计数据。
+
+---
+
+### 2. 过度强调知名度和媒体报道
+
+**需要注意的词汇**：独立报道、地方/区域/国家媒体、由知名专家撰写、活跃的社交媒体账号
+
+**改写前**：
+> 她的观点被《纽约时报》、BBC、《金融时报》和《印度教徒报》引用。她在社交媒体上拥有活跃的存在，拥有超过 50 万粉丝。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 在 2024 年《纽约时报》的采访中，她认为 AI 监管应该关注结果而不是方法。
+
+---
+
+### 3. 以 -ing 结尾的肤浅分析
+
+**需要注意的词汇**：突出/强调/彰显……、确保……、反映/象征……、为……做出贡献、培养/促进……、涵盖……、展示……
+
+**改写前**：
+> 寺庙的蓝色、绿色和金色色调与该地区的自然美景产生共鸣，象征着德克萨斯州的蓝帽花、墨西哥湾和多样化的德克萨斯州景观，反映了社区与土地的深厚联系。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 寺庙使用蓝色、绿色和金色。建筑师表示这些颜色是为了呼应当地的蓝帽花和墨西哥湾海岸。
+
+---
+
+### 4. 宣传和广告式语言
+
+**需要注意的词汇**：拥有（夸张用法）、充满活力的、丰富的（比喻）、深刻的、增强其、展示、体现、致力于、自然之美、坐落于、位于……的中心、开创性的（比喻）、著名的、令人叹为观止的、必游之地、迷人的
+
+**改写前**：
+> 坐落在埃塞俄比亚贡德尔地区令人叹为观止的区域内，Alamata Raya Kobo 是一座充满活力的城镇，拥有丰富的文化遗产和迷人的自然美景。
+
+**改写后**：
+> Alamata Raya Kobo 是埃塞俄比亚贡德尔地区的一座城镇，以其每周集市和 18 世纪教堂而闻名。
+
+---
+
+### 5. 模糊归因和含糊措辞
+
+**需要注意的词汇**：行业报告显示、观察者指出、专家认为、一些批评者认为、多个来源/出版物（实际引用却很少）
+
+**改写前**：
+> 由于其独特的特征，浩来河引起了研究人员和保护主义者的兴趣。专家认为它在区域生态系统中发挥着至关重要的作用。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 根据中国科学院 2019 年的调查，浩来河支持多种特有鱼类。
+
+---
+
+### 6. 提纲式的"挑战与未来展望"部分
+
+**需要注意的词汇**：尽管其……面临若干挑战……、尽管存在这些挑战、挑战与遗产、未来展望
+
+**改写前**：
+> 尽管工业繁荣，Korattur 面临着城市地区典型的挑战，包括交通拥堵和水资源短缺。尽管存在这些挑战，凭借其战略位置和正在进行的举措，Korattur 继续蓬勃发展，成为钦奈增长不可或缺的一部分。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 2015 年三个新 IT 园区开业后，交通拥堵加剧。市政公司于 2022 年启动了雨水排水项目，以解决反复发生的洪水。
+
+---
+
+## 语言和语法模式 (LANGUAGE PATTERNS)
+
+### 7. 过度使用的"AI 词汇"
+
+**高频 AI 词汇**：此外、与……保持一致、至关重要、深入探讨、强调、持久的、增强、培养、获得、突出（动词）、相互作用、复杂/复杂性、关键（形容词）、格局（抽象名词）、关键性的、展示、织锦（抽象名词）、证明、强调（动词）、宝贵的、充满活力的
+
+**改写前**：
+> 此外，索马里菜肴的一个显著特征是加入骆驼肉。意大利殖民影响的持久证明是当地烹饪格局中广泛采用意大利面，展示了这些菜肴如何融入传统饮食。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 索马里菜肴还包括骆驼肉，被认为是一种美味。在意大利殖民期间引入的意大利面菜肴仍然很常见，尤其是在南部。
+
+---
+
+### 8. 避免使用"是"（系动词回避）
+
+**需要注意的词汇**：作为/代表/标志着/充当 [一个]、拥有/设有/提供 [一个]
+
+**改写前**：
+> Gallery 825 作为 LAAA 的当代艺术展览空间。画廊设有四个独立空间，拥有超过 3000 平方英尺。
+
+**改写后**：
+> Gallery 825 是 LAAA 的当代艺术展览空间。画廊有四个房间，总面积 3000 平方英尺。
+
+---
+
+### 9. 否定式排比
+
+**改写前**：
+> 这不仅仅是节拍在人声下流动；它是攻击性和氛围的一部分。这不仅仅是一首歌，而是一种声明。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 沉重的节拍增加了攻击性的基调。
+
+---
+
+### 10. 三段式法则过度使用
+
+**改写前**：
+> 活动包括主题演讲、小组讨论和社交机会。与会者可以期待创新、灵感和行业洞察。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 活动包括演讲和小组讨论。会议之间还有非正式社交的时间。
+
+---
+
+### 11. 刻意换词（同义词循环）
+
+**改写前**：
+> 主人公面临许多挑战。主要角色必须克服障碍。中心人物最终获得胜利。英雄回到家中。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 主人公面临许多挑战，但最终获得胜利并回到家中。
+
+---
+
+### 12. 虚假范围
+
+**改写前**：
+> 我们穿越宇宙的旅程将我们从大爆炸的奇点带到宏伟的宇宙网，从恒星的诞生和死亡到暗物质的神秘舞蹈。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 这本书涵盖了大爆炸、恒星形成和当前关于暗物质的理论。
+
+---
+
+## 风格模式 (STYLE PATTERNS)
+
+### 13. 破折号过度使用
+
+**改写前**：
+> 这个术语主要由荷兰机构推广——而不是由人民自己。你不会说"荷兰，欧洲"作为地址——但这种错误标记仍在继续——即使在官方文件中。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 这个术语主要由荷兰机构推广，而不是由人民自己。你不会说"荷兰，欧洲"作为地址，但这种错误标记在官方文件中仍在继续。
+
+---
+
+### 14. 粗体过度使用
+
+**改写前**：
+> 它融合了 **OKR（目标和关键结果）**、**KPI（关键绩效指标）** 和视觉战略工具，如 **商业模式画布（BMC）** 和 **平衡计分卡（BSC）**。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 它融合了 OKR、KPI 和视觉战略工具，如商业模式画布和平衡计分卡。
+
+---
+
+### 15. 内联标题垂直列表
+
+**改写前**：
+> - **用户体验：** 用户体验通过新界面得到显著改善。
+> - **性能：** 性能通过优化算法得到增强。
+> - **安全性：** 安全性通过端到端加密得到加强。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 更新改进了界面，通过优化算法加快了加载时间，并添加了端到端加密。
+
+---
+
+## 交流模式 (COMMUNICATION PATTERNS)
+
+### 16. 协作交流痕迹
+
+**需要注意的词汇**：希望这对您有帮助、当然！、一定！、您说得完全正确！、您想要……、请告诉我、这是一个……
+
+**改写前**：
+> 这是法国大革命的概述。希望这对您有帮助！如果您想让我扩展任何部分，请告诉我。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 法国大革命始于 1789 年，当时财政危机和粮食短缺导致了广泛的动荡。
+
+---
+
+### 17. 知识截止日期免责声明
+
+**需要注意的词汇**：截至 [日期]、根据我最后的训练更新、虽然具体细节有限/稀缺……、基于可用信息……
+
+**改写前**：
+> 虽然关于公司成立的具体细节在现成资料中没有广泛记录，但它似乎是在 20 世纪 90 年代的某个时候成立的。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 根据注册文件，该公司成立于 1994 年。
+
+---
+
+## 填充模式 (FILLER PATTERNS)
+
+### 18. 填充短语
+
+| 改写前 | 改写后 |
+|--------|--------|
+| "为了实现这一目标" | "为了实现这一点" |
+| "由于下雨的事实" | "因为下雨" |
+| "在这个时间点" | "现在" |
+| "在您需要帮助的情况下" | "如果您需要帮助" |
+| "系统具有处理的能力" | "系统可以处理" |
+| "值得注意的是数据显示" | "数据显示" |
+
+---
+
+### 19. 过度限定
+
+**改写前**：
+> 可以潜在地可能被认为该政策可能会对结果产生一些影响。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 该政策可能会影响结果。
+
+---
+
+### 20. 通用积极结论
+
+**改写前**：
+> 公司的未来看起来光明。激动人心的时代即将到来，他们继续追求卓越的旅程。这代表了向正确方向迈出的重要一步。
+
+**改写后**：
+> 该公司计划明年再开设两个地点。
+
+---
+
+## 来源
+
+[基于维基百科：AI 写作特征](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia/Signs_of_AI_writing)